List Of Members Research Articles

Docencia MIR y universitaria en pediatras de Atención Primaria en Euskadi en 2023: ¿están satisfechos con el reconocimiento de su labor docente?

Introduction and objectives: the Basque Association of Primary Care Pediatrics (AVPap), sought to determine the degree of recognition and satisfaction of primary care paediatricians engaged in teaching at both the undergraduate and postgraduate levels. Method: survey conducted through a Google Forms questionnaire distributed to the mailing list of AVPap members between May-June 2023. Results: the sample included 92 responses (30% of the membership). Eighty-seven percent of respondent were female; 33% were aged 51-60 years , 31.5% less than 40 years, 20.5% between 40-50 years and 15% more than 60 years. As regards teaching , 52.17% (48) reported teaching medical resident-intern (MIRs) trainees in paediatrics , 75% (69) MIR trainees in family medicine and 57.6% (53) medical students. Among those teaching in the paediatrics MIR programme, 1% were primary clinical supervisors, 55% supporting clinical instructors and 44% reported teaching but not knowing their specific role. Among those teaching medical students, there was only one associate professor. Twenty-nine percent were recognised as venia docendi (authorization by university administration for academic role in official educational progammes for staff other than teachers); 22% received certificates and 48% have no form of academic recognition or remuneration for their teaching activity. The proportion that expressed dissatisfaction with the recognition for their teaching activity was 66.5% of those involved in MIR training and 51% of those involved in medical undergraduate education. Conclusions: only 30% of respondents involved in undergraduate education were officially recognised (venia docendi). Among those involved in paediatrics MIR training, only 1% were primary clinical supervisors and half were support instructors. Sixty percent considered the recognition of their work insufficient.

1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

3. Prevention or Delay of Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

8. Obesity and Weight Management for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

15. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

6. Glycemic Goals and Hypoglycemia: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

17. Diabetes Advocacy: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

The Authority Analysis of Non-Legal Entity Organization and Opportunities for Dispute Resolution Through Litigation

Article 28 of the Indonesian Constitution is formulated to guarantee the freedom of associations and assembly, including the formation of community organizations (ormas). Ormas holding legal entity status are accommodated under associations, while non-legal entity ormas can still register but do not have the same status. The distinction between ormas and associations lies in their legal recognition. Associations possess legal entity status, while ormas are considered non-legal entities. According to Article 20 of Law No. 17 of 2013, ormas have the right to cooperate with other entities to develop and sustain their organizations. However, such cooperation may give rise to conflict, which cannot always be avoided. This raises important questions, such as "Do ormas administrators possess full authority to undertake all legal actions?" and "What avenues are available for ormas to resolve disputes through litigation?" To address these questions, doctrinal research is conducted using both legislative and conceptual methods. The results shows that the authority of ormas administrators is strictly limited by legal provisions. Since ormas lacks the legal standing required of legal entity, they are are unable to resolve conflicts through litigation. In light of such challenges, it is recommended that ormas registration system include a comprehensive list of members authorized to act on behalf of the organizations in civil actions with third parties. This measure would enable ormas to explore non-litigation channels for resolving civil disputes, offering a practical alternative to formal court proceedings.

Training for transformation: examining food systems courses at US land-grant universities

Higher education institutions can play an essential role in preparing students to participate in movements for just and sustainable food systems change. For the past two decades, many United States land-grant universities (LGUs) have developed food systems education (FSE) courses. This study examined the extent to which FSE courses employ four capacities deemed crucial by the FSE literature: multidimensional approaches, interdisciplinarity, centering equity, and training students to take action in food systems. The syllabi of 171 undergraduate courses at 20 LGUs were obtained by contacting instructors, and their course descriptions and learning outcomes were analyzed. This subset of LGUs were identified from the membership list of the Menus of Change University Research Collaborative (MCURC), a nationwide network of colleges using campus dining halls and classrooms as living laboratories for food systems change. Most course descriptions and learning outcomes exhibited multidimensional approaches and interdisciplinarity. However, many failed to incorporate teaching content and practices that help students critically examine equity and social justice issues in food systems, or engage in transformative change. LGUs have both the resources and urgent responsibility to empower students to be part of movements to transform unjust, unsustainable food systems. The findings of this study, and an accompanying open-access syllabus website, aim to accelerate the development of FSE curricula that prepare students to change food systems.

Impact of collective knowledge on individual research competence: exploring the mediating influence of knowledge management processes

PurposeThe purpose of the current study is to investigate the impact of collective knowledge on individual research competence. Further, the study investigates the mediation effect of the knowledge management process (KMP).Design/methodology/approachThe cross-sectional study adopts a quantitative conclusive research design. The study collects data specifically from academicians of Uttarakhand higher education institutions (HEIs). The study uses random sampling because the list of faculty members is uploaded on the website of the university portal. The author directly sends the questionnaire to the email of the respondents and uses social media platforms. For the data analysis, the study used SMART-PLS 4.0.FindingsThe findings of the study reveal that KM infrastructure (KMI) and KM strategy directly impact KMP. The study also reveals that the KMP significantly impacts individual research competence. The current study also finds partial mediation support among KMI, KMP and individual research competence, and between KM strategy, KMP and individual research competence.Research limitations/implicationsThe current study uses a cross-sectional research design, future studies may include the longitudinal design to measure the effect of KM elements on individual research competence. The current study includes the data from the Uttarakhand region only, and it is difficult to generalize the results specifically to other states.Practical implicationsThe study emphasizes the importance of KM system development, a supportive KMI and a balanced KM strategy in HEIs.Originality/value Investigating collective knowledge’s impact on individual research competence, this study unveils mediation in KMP. Future research can broaden horizons by using the model.

Preface

The NEWRAD Conferences bring together participants from National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) and key user communities in advanced radiometry. The 15th International Conference on New Developments and Applications in Optical Radiometry (NEWRAD 2023) was held at the National Physical Laboratory (NPL) in Teddington, UK, from 11th to 15th September 2023. The confernce was organised by NPL’s Optical Radiometric Metrology (ORM) group, who also handled abstract submissions and website administration. The NEWRAD 2023 conference saw 143 registered participants, with a total of 129 papers presented. Among these, 41 were oral presentations, complemented by 7 invited talks. Additionally, 88 posters were showcased during breaks and dedicated sessions, sparking lively discussions and idea exchange. The NEWRAD 2023 conference proceedings comprise contributions from the conference presentations. The submitted papers underwent peer review following the procedures of the Journal of Physics: Conference Series. I wish to thank the diligent reviewers and the dedicated editorial staff at the Journal of Physics: Conference Series for their meticulous work in facilitating the publication of these proceedings. I also wish to thank Nicole George, Dan Moore, Roger Hughes, Paris Aitken-Smith, and the entire organizing teams at NPL for hosting an exceptional conference. Finally, I want to express sincere appreciation to the NEWRAD scientific committee, who diligently reviewed and selected all the abstracts submitted to the conference, and provided unwavering support in organizing this event. Undoubtedly, this issue will serve as a valuable reference for radiometry. The venue of the next NEWRAD Conference is being organised and will be announced very shortly. List of NEWRAD scientific committee member is available in this Pdf.

A Showcase Presentation Honoring the Editorial Board of Clinics in Dermatology

For over forty years, the Editorial Board of Clinics in Dermatology has been working behind the scenes to help our Editor-in Chief, Dr. Lawrence Parish, bring to readers the best contributions in dermatology. Herein, we tell the story of the beginnings of Clinics in Dermatology and provide a list of the inaugural board members of which we highlight four: Drs. Jean Civatte, John Thorne Crissey, Francisco Kerdal-Vegas, and Joseph A. Witkowski. In addition we showcase our present 44 Editorial Board members including our Managing Editor Dr. Hirak Behari Routh,our Senior Deputy Editors Dr. Larry E. Millikan, and Dr. Marcia Ramos-e-Silva, and our esteemed Chief Editor Dr. Lawrence Charles Parish and Chief Editor Designate, Dr. Vinod E. Nambudiri. We are proud that all our Editorial Board members come with stellaracademic achievements in dermatology and from all over the world. We are an active Editorial Board, who work together, issue after issue, to provide the best in peer review contributions and theme issues. We look forward to continuing in this role for many years to come and weare grateful to our current publisher, Elsevier, and to our many authors, and dear readers for their ongoing support and encouragement.