Melphalan Resistance Research Articles

Inhibition of O6‐methylguanine‐DNA‐methyltransferase (MGMT) by lomeguatrib reduces multiple myeloma cell viability and impairs DNA repair in MGMT‐proficient cells

AbstractThe function of direct DNA damage repair protein, namely MGMT in MM, and the impact of MGMT on melphalan treatment remains unclear. We showed a significantly higher MGMT mRNA expression in CD138+ myeloma cells than in matched CD138‐nontumorigenic cells derived from newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM patients using qPCR. However, using gene expression databases, a similar expression of MGMT was observed during disease progression. MGMT depletion by its specific inhibitor lomeguatrib reduced myeloma cell viability, impaired S phase entry and DNA repair, and increased DNA damage and apoptosis. Apoptosis and DNA damage were further elevated by combined treatment with lomeguatrib and melphalan in RPMI 8226 cells. This is the first study demonstrating MGMT inhibition enhances DNA damage‐induced apoptosis and melphalan cytotoxicity in MGMT‐proficient MM cells and suggesting using lomeguatrib might have clinical importance in treating MM and overcoming melphalan resistance in MGMT‐proficient patients.

Identification of potential molecular players and therapeutic drug molecules in Melphalan resistant Multiple myeloma by integrated bioinformatics analysis

Multiple myeloma (MM), second most common haematological malignancy, still remains incurable with the acquiring of drug resistance. Melphalan therapy which has been used as one of the key therapies against MM, is impeded by the occurrence of Melphalan resistance. The precise underlying mechanism of this acquired Melphalan resistance in MM is not yet well deciphered. Therefore, this present study was aimed to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated micro RNAs (miRNAs) and transcription factors (TFs) from the microarray dataset of Melphalan resistant and Melphalan sensitive MM cell lines, obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. DEGs were analysed using GEO2R tool from the dataset. Then the gene ontology (GO) and pathway enrichment analysis were executed by using DAVID database. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network of DEGs was constructed and analysed by using STRING database and Cytoscape tool. Genetic alterations in DEGs were studied through COSMIC database. Network of interaction of DEGs and miRNAs as well as TFs was constructed and analysed by using mirDIP, TRRUST and miRNet tools. Drug gene interaction was examined to identify potential drug molecules by DGIdb tool. Various DEGs that might play pivotal role in Melphalan resistant MM, were detected and selected for further analysis. miRNA analysis detected hsa-mir- 21-3p, hsa-mir-27a-5p, hsa-mir-129-2-3p that could interact with maximum target DEGs. One TF, STAT1 was found to regulate the expression of selected DEGs. The whole study may give a better understanding about the Melphalan resistance in MM.

Metabolic Changes Are Associated with Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma.

Multiple myeloma is an incurable hematological malignancy that impacts tens of thousands of people every year in the United States. Treatment for eligible patients involves induction, consolidation with stem cell rescue, and maintenance. High-dose therapy with a DNA alkylating agent, melphalan, remains the primary drug for consolidation therapy in conjunction with autologous stem-cell transplantation; as such, melphalan resistance remains a relevant clinical challenge. Here, we describe a proteometabolomic approach to examine mechanisms of acquired melphalan resistance in two cell line models. Drug metabolism, steady-state metabolomics, activity-based protein profiling (ABPP, data available at PRIDE: PXD019725), acute-treatment metabolomics, and western blot analyses have allowed us to further elucidate metabolic processes associated with melphalan resistance. Proteometabolomic data indicate that drug-resistant cells have higher levels of pentose phosphate pathway metabolites. Purine, pyrimidine, and glutathione metabolisms were commonly altered, and cell-line-specific changes in metabolite levels were observed, which could be linked to the differences in steady-state metabolism of naïve cells. Inhibition of selected enzymes in purine synthesis and pentose phosphate pathways was evaluated to determine their potential to improve melphalan's efficacy. The clinical relevance of these proteometabolomic leads was confirmed by comparison of tumor cell transcriptomes from newly diagnosed MM patients and patients with relapsed disease after treatment with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem-cell transplantation. The observation of common and cell-line-specific changes in metabolite levels suggests that omic approaches will be needed to fully examine melphalan resistance in patient specimens and define personalized strategies to optimize the use of high-dose melphalan.

The O6-methyguanine-DNA methyltransferase inhibitor O6-benzylguanine enhanced activity of temozolomide + irinotecan against models of high-risk neuroblastoma.

DNA-damaging chemotherapy is a major component of therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma, and patients often relapse with treatment-refractory disease. We hypothesized that DNA repair genes with increased expression in alkylating agent resistant models would provide therapeutic targets for enhancing chemotherapy. In-vitro cytotoxicity of alkylating agents for 12 patient-derived neuroblastoma cell lines was assayed using DIMSCAN, and mRNA expression of 57 DNA repair, three transporter, and two glutathione synthesis genes was assessed by TaqMan low-density array (TLDA) with further validation by qRT-PCR in 26 cell lines. O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) mRNA was upregulated in cell lines with greater melphalan and temozolomide (TMZ) resistance. MGMT expression also correlated significantly with resistance to TMZ+irinotecan (IRN) (in-vitro as the SN38 active metabolite). Forced overexpression of MGMT (lentiviral transduction) in MGMT non-expressing cell lines significantly increased TMZ+SN38 resistance. The MGMT inhibitor O6-benzylguanine (O6BG) enhanced TMZ+SN38 in-vitro cytotoxicity, H2AX phosphorylation, caspase-3 cleavage, and apoptosis by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling. TMZ+IRN+O6BG delayed tumor growth and increased survival relative to TMZ+IRN in two of seven patient-derived xenografts established at time of death from progressive neuroblastoma. We demonstrated that high MGMT expression was associated with resistance to alkylating agents and TMZ+IRN in preclinical neuroblastoma models. The MGMT inhibitor O6BG enhanced the anticancer effect of TMZ+IRN in vitro and in vivo. These results support further preclinical studies exploring MGMT as a therapeutic target and biomarker of TMZ+IRN resistance in high-risk neuroblastoma.

Increased DNA Repair Gene Expression Correlates with MYC Expression and Inferior Progression-Free Survival in Multiple Myeloma Patients

High dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation is standard of care for the upfront treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Several studies have shown upregulation of single DNA repair genes and whole DNA repair pathways as associated with melphalan resistance and poor outcomes after ASCT. Here we set out to identify the most important DNA repair enzymes and pathways to predict outcomes after ASCT using the MMRF CoMMpass dataset but instead found DNA repair gene expression to be a poor prognostic feature regardless of treatment. Of the 561 MM patients who received ASCT as part of frontline therapy, 378 (67%) patients had whole transcriptome sequencing data available for analysis in this study. The majority of patients in this cohort received a 3-drug novel agent-based regimen for first line treatment. We selected 81 genes of known function related to DNA damage repair across multiple pathways. Using the median mRNA expression as cutoff for each gene, we first compared PFS for high vs. low expressers and found 38 genes in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER) and Fanconi anemia (FA) pathway which predicted for inferior survival with higher expression (p≤0.05). We subsequently analyzed each gene individually in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for known prognostic and treatment-related factors (age, gender, race, ISS stage, LDH, normal/abnormal cytogenetics, high risk FISH/cytogenetics, cycles to first response, frontline treatment, and time to transplant) and found that 9 genes retained significance including 3 genes in NHEJ (POLL, PRKDC, NHEJ1), 3 in FA pathway (BRIP1, RMI1, FANCE) and 3 in MMR (MLH3, MSH2 and PMS1). In addition, increased pathway level gene overexpression for NHEJ (p=0.02) and MMR (0.009) pathways conferred worse PFS. Genes involved in NER did not retain significance despite this pathway being involved with repair of melphalan-induced bulky adducts formation. Additionally, high MMR pathway expression was significant despite this pathway not having a known role in repair of melphalan-induced DNA damage. To validate the specific importance of these genes in predicting response to ASCT, we tested whether high expression predicted outcomes in patients who did not undergo ASCT. In 387 non-ASCT patients with whole transcriptome sequencing available, NHEJ and MMR gene expression were significant predictors of PFS confirming that this finding was not specific to patients undergoing ASCT. We next correlated the expression of NHEJ and MMR genes and found significant co-expression of these genes (r=0.55-0.8), suggesting a common mediator leading to global upregulation of DNA repair. As increased MYC activity is a common finding in MM and is a master regulator of transcription, we hypothesized the DNA damage repair genes were upregulated by increased MYC activity. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of hallmark gene sets confirmed that patients with increased DNA repair were also enriched for MYC targets (FDR=0.0063). Based on this, we hypothesized that oncogene-mediated constitutive DNA damage and replication stress (RS) are a hallmark of high risk and aggressive myeloma. Here we present novel findings to show that global DNA repair upregulation occurs in high risk disease as evidenced by the inferior PFS. We hypothesize that this could be attributed to MYC-related increased gene transcription resulting in DNA damage and RS which in turn recruits several DNA repair pathways. These specific DNA repair pathways and signal activation pathways involved with replication stress represent novel therapeutic targets in myeloma. Disclosures Calip: Flatiron Health: Current Employment. Hofmeister:Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Nektar: Honoraria, Research Funding; Imbrium: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Oncolytics Biotech: Research Funding. Patel:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy.

Abstract 1843: Melflufen efficacy in multiple myeloma with TP53 aberrations

Abstract Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell malignancy characterized by clonal evolution and heterogeneous genetic abnormalities. Deletion of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del17p) harboring TP53 is a high-risk abnormality associated with aggressive disease and therapy resistance. Here, we tested in vitro and ex vivo efficacy of a peptide-drug conjugate melflufen, currently in phase 3 clinical trials for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), in an isogenic myeloma p53-abrogated cell line model and patient samples. Methods Efficacy of melflufen versus melphalan was tested in the AMO-1 cell line, which displays biallelic wildtype TP53 and retains aspects of a functional p53 system, and AMO-1 clones with either complete loss of p53 or expressing point-mutated p53 protein (R282W hotspot mutation), created using the CRISPR/Cas9 system and modified via Sleeping Beauty vectors. We assessed toxicity and apoptosis using Annexin V and Alamar blue assays. Ex vivo sensitivity to the drugs was examined by flow cytometry in CD138+ plasma cells isolated from MM patients with confirmed del17p or TP53 mutations. We also analyzed response rates in a subpopulation of patients with confirmed del17p from OP-106 HORIZON, an ongoing phase 2 study evaluating the efficacy of melflufen plus dexamethasone in patients with RRMM (NCT02963493). Results Whereas loss of p53 functionality strongly impaired melphalan induced cytotoxicity in the AMO-1 MM cell line model system, treatment with melflufen showed superior efficacy in the parental cells, and was effective independent of the respective TP53 status. Although at low dosages wild-type cells were still more sensitive, in contrast to melphalan this effect was overcome by slight dose increases of melflufen, due to the much steeper dose-effect relationships in the p53 deficient sublines. In contrast to melphalan, the melflufen effect was only partially blocked by combined pre-treatment with inhibitors of apoptosis and necroptosis. Similar results were observed in patient-derived material with melflufen displaying superior activity towards TP53 mutated plasma cells. Analysis of OP-106 HORIZON trial data showed comparable ORR of 20% (CI 95% 4.3-48.1) in the del17p subpopulation (n=15) to 26.2% (CI 95% 18.8-34.6) in the total population (n=136). Conclusions Melflufen is able to trigger myeloma cell death regardless of p53 status, and thus overcome p53-deficiency-mediated melphalan resistance. It demonstrates better ex vivo efficacy in MM patient derived plasma cells harboring del17p or TP53 mutations. Melflufen response rates in the del17p Citation Format: Ana Slipicevic, Umair Munawar, Thorsten Stühmer, Johan Aschan, Fredrik Lehmann, Nina N. Nupponen, Juho Miettinen, Maiju-Emilia Huppunen, Caroline A. Heckman, María-Victoria Mateos, Paula Rodríguez Otero, Paul Richardson, Ralf Bargou. Melflufen efficacy in multiple myeloma with TP53 aberrations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1843.

PARP Inhibition Synergizes with Melphalan but Does not Reverse Resistance Completely.

High-dose melphalan (MEL) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Resistance to MEL has been linked to increased DNA repair. Here we sought to identify whether inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) synergizes with MEL and can overcome resistance. We tested the synergistic cytotoxicity of 3 inhibitors of PARP (PARPi)-veliparib (VEL), olaparib (OLA), and niraparib (NIRA)-combined with MEL in RPMI8226 and U266 MM cell lines, as well as in their MEL resistance counterparts, RPMI8226-LR5 (LR5) and U266-LR6 (LR6). The addition of VEL, OLA, and NIRA to MEL reduced the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) in RPMI8226 cells from 27.8 µM to 23.1 µM, 22.5 µM, and 18.0 µM, respectively. Similarly, the IC50 of MEL in U266 cells was decreased from 6.2 µM to 3.2 µM, 3.3 µM, and 3.0 µM, respectively. In LR5 and LR6 cells, PARPi did not reverse MEL resistance. We confirmed this in a NOD/SCID/gamma null xenograft mouse model with either MEL-sensitive (RPMI8226) or MEL-resistant (LR5) MM. Treatment with a MEL-VEL combination prolonged survival compared with MEL alone in RPMI8226 mice (107 days versus 67.5 days; P=.0009), but not in LR5 mice (41 versus 39 days; P=.09). We next tested whether 2 double-stranded DNA repair mechanisms, homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), cause MEL resistance in LR5 and LR6 cells. In an HR assay, LR6 cells had a 4.5-fold greater HR capability than parent U226 cells (P=.05); however, LR5 cells had an equivalent HR ability as parent RPMI8226 cells. We hypothesized that NHEJ may be a mediator of MEL resistance in LR5 cells. Given that DNA-PK is integral to NHEJ and may be a therapeutic target, we treated LR5 cells with the DNA-PK inhibitor NU7026 in combination with MEL. Although NU7026 alone at 2.5 µM had no cytotoxicity, in combination it completely reversed resistance to MEL (MEL IC50, 46.4 µM versus 14.4 µM). We examined the clinical implications of our findings in a dataset of 414 patients treated with tandem ASCT. High PARP1 expressers had lower survival compared with patients with low expression (median 42.7 months versus median not reached; P=.003). We hypothesized that combined expression of the HR gene BRCA1, the NHEJ gene PRKDC (DNA-PK), and PARP1 may predict survival and found that overexpression of 0 (n=101), 1 or 2 (n=287), or all 3 (n=26) genes had a negative impact on median survival (undefined versus 57.8 months versus 14.8 months; P < .0001). Here we demonstrate that PARPi synergized with MEL, but that resistance (which may be due to HR and NHEJ pathways) is not completely reversed by PARPi. In addition, we observed that a 3-gene analysis may be tested to identify patients resistant or sensitive to high-dose MEL.

Overcoming Melphalan Resistance By Targeting Crucial DNA Repair Pathways in Multiple Myeloma

High dose melphalan (MEL) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard of care in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Resistance to MEL has been linked to increased DNA repair. Here we sought to identify which DNA repair pathways lead to MEL resistance. As inhibitors of the single strand DNA repair enzyme PARP1 are clinically available, we first examined whether PARP1 gene expression affected clinical outcomes. In a dataset of 414 patients treated with tandem ASCT, high PARP1 expression lead to reduced survival compared to patients with low expression (42.7 months vs. median not reached, p=0.003). We therefore tested in vitro the cytotoxicity of PARPi with veliparib (VEL), olaparib (OLA) or niraparib (NIRA) in RPMI8226 and U266 MM cell lines as well as their MEL resistance counterparts, RPMI8226-LR5 (LR5) and U266-LR6 (LR6). At physiologic doses PARPi alone was not cytotoxic. However, the MEL IC50 in RPMI8226 cells decreased from 27.8 to 23.1, 22.5 and 18.0 µM with the addition of VEL, OLA and NIRA respectively. Similarly, MEL IC50 decreased in U266 cells from 6.2 to 3.2, 3.3 and 3.0 µM. However, in LR5 and LR6 cells, PARPi did not completely reverse MEL resistance. We confirmed this in a NOD/SCID/gamma null xenograft mouse model with either MEL sensitive (RPMI8226) or resistant (LR5) MM. Treatment with a MEL-VEL combination prolonged survival in RPMI8226 mice compared to MEL alone (107 vs. 67.5 days, p=0.0009), but not in LR5 mice (41 vs. 39 days, p=0.09). Next we tested whether the double strand DNA repair mechanisms, homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), cause MEL resistance which is not overcome by PARPi. Using an HR assay, LR6 cells had 4.5 fold higher HR ability than parent U226 cells (p = 0.05) showing this to be a possible mechanism of resistance. However, LR5 cells had equivalent HR ability to parent RPMI8226 cells. We therefore hypothesized that NHEJ may be a mediator of MEL resistance in LR5 cells. As DNA-PK is integral to NHEJ and may be a therapeutic target, we treated LR5 cells with the DNA-PK inhibitor NU7026 in combination with MEL. Although NU7026 alone at 2.5 µM had no cytotoxicity, in combination it completely reversed resistance to MEL resulting in a lower IC50 than even parent RPMI8226 cells (46.4 vs. 14.4 µM). Based on our findings, we hypothesized that combined expression of the HR gene BRCA1, the NHEJ gene DNA-PK, and PARP1 may predict survival in patients undergoing ASCT. Using the same clinical dataset, we found that overexpression of 0 (n=101), 1-2 (n=287), or all 3 genes (n=26) strongly predicted median survival (undefined vs. 57.8 vs. 14.8 months, p Here we demonstrated that MEL resistance is not completely reversed by PARPi, while it may be overcome by targeting HR and NHEJ pathways. In addition, we observed that a 3 gene analysis pre-ASCT may help predict patients that are inherently resistant or sensitive to high dose MEL.

Inhibition of HSP90 overcomes melphalan resistance through downregulation of Src in multiple myeloma cells.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy. In spite of the development of new therapeutic agents, MM remains incurable due to multidrug resistance (MDR) and the 5-year survival rate is approximately 50%. Thus, further study is needed to investigate the mechanism of MDR and improve MM prognosis. Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) is a molecular chaperone that is responsible for the stability of a number of client proteins, most of which are involved in tumor progression. Therefore, HSP90 inhibitors represent potential new therapeutic agents for cancer. Furthermore, inhibition of HSP90 leads to degradation of client proteins, overcoming acquired anti-cancer drug resistance. In this study, we assessed the role of HSP90 in MDR using established melphalan-resistant MM cells. We found that expression of HSP90 was higher in melphalan-resistant MM cells than in parent cells and that HSP90 inhibitors KW-2478 and NUV-AUY922 restored drug sensitivity to the level observed in parent cells. Activation of the unfolded protein response is a hallmark of MM, and expression of endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling molecules is reduced in melphalan-resistant cells; however, KW-2478 did not affect endoplasmic reticulum stress signaling. We demonstrated that treatment with KW-2478 decreased expression of Src, a client of HSP90, and suppressed the activity of ERK, Akt, and NF-κB. Our findings indicate that inhibition of HSP90 results in suppression of Src and its downstream effectors, including ERK, Akt, and NF-κB, and therefore that HSP90 inhibitors could be useful for treatment of MDR MM.

Overexpression of HIF-1α contributes to melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells by activation of ERK1/2, Akt, and NF-κB

Multiple myeloma (MM) commonly displays multidrug resistance and is associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, it is important to identify the mechanisms by which MM cells develop multidrug resistance. Our previous study showed that multidrug resistance is correlated with overexpression of multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1) and Survivin, and downregulation of Bim expression in melphalan-resistant RPMI8226/L-PAM cells; however, the underlying mechanism of multidrug resistance remains unclear. In the present study, we investigated the mechanism of multidrug resistance in melphalan-resistant cells. We found that RPMI8226/L-PAM and ARH-77/L-PAM cells showed increased phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and Akt, and nuclear localization of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB). The combination of ERK1/2, Akt, and NF-κB inhibitors with melphalan reversed melphalan resistance via suppression of Survivin expression and enhanced Bim expression in melphalan-resistant cells. In addition, RPMI8226/L-PAM and ARH-77/L-PAM cells overexpressed hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) via activation of ERK1/2, Akt, and NF-κB. Moreover, suppression of HIF-1α by echinomycin or HIF-1α siRNA resensitized RPMI8226/L-PAM cells to melphalan through downregulation of Survivin expression and upregulation of Bim expression. These results indicate that enhanced Survivin expression and decreased Bim expression by HIF-1α via activation of ERK1/2, Akt, and NF-κB play a critical role in melphalan resistance. Our findings suggest that HIF-1α, ERK1/2, Akt, and NF-κB inhibitors are potentially useful as anti-MDR agents for the treatment of melphalan-resistant MM.In this study, the authors show that overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor(HIF)-1α by ERK1/2, Akt and NF-κB activation contributes to melphalan-resistance in multiple myeloma (MM) cells. Additionally, inhibition of HIF-1α resensitizes melphalan-resistant MM cells to melphalan. Therefore, HIF-1α inhibitors may be therapeutically useful as anti-multidrug resistance protein agents in MM.

Proteometabolomics of Melphalan Resistance in Multiple Myeloma

Although advancements in therapeutic regimens for treating multiple myeloma (MM) have prolonged patient survival, the disease remains incurable. Several classes of drugs have contributed to these improvements, such as proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators, deacetylase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and alkylating agents including melphalan. An expanded arsenal of diverse chemotherapy targets has improved patient care significantly, yet we still lack sufficient knowledge of how cellular metabolism and drug processing can contribute to drug resistance. To address this issue, we utilize cell line models to simulate naïve and drug resistant states, which identify drug modifications, endogenous metabolites, proteins, and acute metabolic profile alterations associated with therapeutic escape.Here, we specifically focus on melphalan; an alkylating agent that forms DNA interstrand crosslinks, inhibits cell division, and leads to cell death through apoptosis (Povirk & Shuker. Mutat. Res. 1994, 318, 205). Melphalan remains a critical component of high dose therapy in the context of stem cell transplant and induction therapy in transplant ineligible patients outside the US. Ineffectiveness of alkylating agents remains a critical problem and serves as an excellent model for investigation of cellular metabolism and its contribution to drug resistance.Two parental MM cell lines (8226 & U266) were obtained from ATCC and resistant derivatives of each cell line (8226-LR5 & U266-LR6) were selected after chronic drug exposure. To assess mechanisms of melphalan resistance, we use liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomics and proteomics approaches, including studies of drug metabolism, untargeted metabolomics, and activity based protein profiling (ABPP). Drug metabolism monitors the intracellular and extracellular drug modifications over a 24-hour period after acute treatment. Untargeted metabolomics is used to compare the steady state endogenous intracellular metabolites of naïve and drug resistant cells. Differences in endogenous metabolites between naïve and drug resistant cell lines are also examined in the acute treatment dataset. ABPP utilizes desthiobiotinylating probes to enrich for ATP-utilizing enzymes, which are identified and quantified to enable comparison.We initially compared acute melphalan treatment in drug naive and resistant isogenic cell line pairs. Predictably, melphalan was converted into monohydroxylated and dihydroxylated metabolites more quickly in cells than in media controls. Differences in the formation of these metabolites between the naïve and resistant cell lines were not observed. The untargeted metabolomics data indicated in the 8226-LR5 model, glutathione and xanthine levels are elevated, while guanine is suppressed relative to naive cells. ABPP demonstrated changes in several enzymes related to purine and glutathione metabolism (Figure 1). Interestingly, the U266/U266-LR6 cell line models exhibit higher baseline levels of glutathione when compared with 8226/8226-LR5, indicating heterogeneous means of drug resistance. Alterations in arginine biosynthesis and nicotinate/nicotinamide metabolism are observed in the untargeted metabolomics and ABPP of U266/U266-LR6. Common pathways (e.g. purine biosynthesis) are altered in both models, although the changes involve different molecules.In examining two models of acquired melphalan resistance, we demonstrate frank differences in metabolic pathways associated with steady state and acute drug response. These data demonstrate the potential heterogeneity in drug resistance mechanisms and the need for more biomarkers to personalize treatment. Ongoing studies involve introduction of enzyme inhibitors in targeted pathways and supplementation of metabolites to validate their role in resistance. Furthermore, we will examine expression of these metabolic pathways associated with ex vivo melphalan resistance in a cohort of over 100 patient samples with paired RNA sequencing. The long term goals are to elucidate mechanisms of therapeutic response, identify biomarkers of metabolism in melphalan resistance, enhance drug efficacy, predict personalized patient treatment, and improve overall MM patient care. DisclosuresNo relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The MIP-1α autocrine loop contributes to decreased sensitivity to anticancer drugs.

Several autocrine soluble factors, including macrophage inflammatory protein-1α (MIP-1α), tumor necrosis factor-α, and hepatocyte growth factor, promote cell survival and growth in multiple myeloma (MM) cells. We hypothesized that inhibition of the MIP-1α autocrine loop may enhance the cytotoxic effect of anticancer drugs in MM cell lines. In the present study, an MIP-1α neutralizing antibody suppressed cell proliferation and enhanced the cytotoxic effect of melphalan or bortezomib on MM cells. In addition, melphalan resistance cells (RPMI8226/L-PAM and HS-sultan/L-PAM cells) secreted MIP-1α and neutralizing antibody of MIP-1α partially overcame melphalan resistance. Moreover, combination treatment with MIP-1α neutralizing antibody and melphalan or bortezomib inhibited extracellular signal regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), Akt, and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Survivin expression, and upregulated the expression of Bim and cleaved Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Treatment of IM9 cells with MIP-1α siRNA suppressed the activation of ERK1/2, Akt, and mTOR, and enhanced the cytotoxic effect of melphalan and bortezomib. These results indicate that MIP-1α neutralizing antibodies or MIP-1α siRNA enhance the cytotoxic effect of melphalan and bortezomib by suppressing the chemokine receptor/ERK and chemokine receptor/Akt/mTOR pathways. The inhibition of MIP-1α may thus provide a new therapeutic approach to control tumor progression and bone destruction in patients with MM.

Preclinical anti-myeloma activity of EDO-S101, a new bendamustine-derived molecule with added HDACi activity, through potent DNA damage induction and impairment of DNA repair

BackgroundDespite recent advances in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the prognosis of most patients remains poor, and resistance to traditional and new drugs frequently occurs. EDO-S101 is a novel therapeutic agent conceived as the fusion of a histone deacetylase inhibitor radical to bendamustine, with the aim of potentiating its alkylating activity.MethodsThe efficacy of EDO-S101 was evaluated in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo, alone, and in combination with standard anti-myeloma agents. The underlying mechanisms of action were also evaluated on MM cell lines, patient samples, and different murine models.ResultsEDO-S101 displayed potent activity in vitro in MM cell lines (IC50 1.6–4.8 μM) and ex vivo in cells isolated from MM patients, which was higher than that of bendamustine and independent of the p53 status and previous melphalan resistance. This activity was confirmed in vivo, in a CB17-SCID murine plasmacytoma model and in de novo Vk*MYC mice, leading to a significant survival improvement in both models. In addition, EDO-S101 was the only drug with single-agent activity in the multidrug resistant Vk12653 murine model. Attending to its mechanism of action, the molecule showed both, a HDACi effect (demonstrated by α-tubulin and histone hyperacetylation) and a DNA-damaging effect (shown by an increase in γH2AX); the latter being again clearly more potent than that of bendamustine. Using a reporter plasmid integrated into the genome of some MM cell lines, we demonstrate that, apart from inducing a potent DNA damage, EDO-S101 specifically inhibited the double strand break repair by the homologous recombination pathway. Moreover, EDO-S101 treatment reduced the recruitment of repair proteins such as RAD51 to DNA-damage sites identified as γH2AX foci. Finally, EDO-S101 preclinically synergized with bortezomib, both in vitro and in vivo.ConclusionThese findings provide rationale for the clinical investigation of EDO-S101 in MM, either as a single agent or in combination with other anti-MM drugs, particularly proteasome inhibitors.

The Synergistic Effect of Melphalan and XPO1 Inhibition in Pre-Clinical Models of Multiple Myeloma

Introduction:Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer of plasma cells. It accounts for approximately 10% of all hematologic malignancies. In the US, it is estimated that there will be approximately 30,330 new cases and 12,650 deaths in 2016. In the past decade, responses/survivals have been significantly increased by newer therapies. However, almost all of the patients will eventually die from multi-drug resistant disease.Materials and Methods:Weused XPO1 inhibitors (XPO1i) selinexor (300nM) or KPT-8602 (300nM) +/- melphalan (15 μM) to treat human MM parental RPMI8226 and U266 cells, and melphalan resistant LR5 and LR6 cell lines for 20 hours and then assayed for apoptosis and viability by flow cytometry. DNA damage was assayed by the comet assay and phospho-H2AX protein expression in H929 human myeloma cells. p53, NFkB, IKKα, FANCF, and FANCL were assayed by Western blot in H929 MM cells. We also treated cells from patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM with the XPO1i (300nM)/ melphalan (10μM) combination and assayed for apoptosis. In addition, selinexor/melphalan treated NOD/SCID-gamma mice with U226 MM tumors were assayed for tumor growth, survival, and toxicity.Results:Cell viability of all tested MM cell lines was decreased synergistically and apoptosis increased by XPO1i/melphalan treatment (selinexor/melphalan, P = 2.2x10E-6 to 0.0032, KPT-8602/ melphalan, P = 1.2X10E-7 to 0.0031). Comet assays showed that the XPO1i/ melphalan drug combination increased DNA damage more than single agent melphalan or XPO1i alone. Phospho-H2AX expression also was increased (selinexor/ melphalan, P = 0.005 and KPT-8602/melphalan, P = 0.001). Western blot analysis showed that XPO1i treatment can increase p53 and decrease NFkB, IKKα, FANCF, and FANCL in MM cells. Apoptosis assays showed that both melphalan-resistant and parental MM cell lines were sensitized to melphalan by XPO1i. In addition, CD138+/light chain+ MM cells from newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM patients were sensitized (20-fold and 5 to10-fold respectively) by XPO1i to melphalan. XPO1i/melphalan combination treatment demonstrated a strong synergistic anti-tumor effect when compared to single-agent melphalan (selinexor, P = 0.0024 and KPT-8602, P = 0.0030) in NOD/SCID-gamma mice challenged with U266 MM tumors. XPO1i/ melphalan treated mice had increased survival and no significant toxicity.Conclusions:XPO1i’s can improve the response of human MM cell lines and patient MM cells to melphalan both in vitro and ex vivo. The mechanism of this synergy reversing melphalan resistance may be due to increased nuclear p53, in combination with decreased NFkB and IKKα, and decreased DNA repair proteins FANCL and FANCF of the Fanconi Anemia/BRCA pathway. Our preliminary data suggest that the synergistic cell kill may be because XPO1i’s increase melphalan-induced DNA damage and block the repair of the DNA damage. Thus using combination therapies of XPO1i, especially the clinical compounds selinexor and KPT-8602 +/- melphalan may have potential to improve the treatment outcomes of MM. Based on these promising pre-clinical data, we designed a phase 1/2 clinical trial evaluating the combination of selinexor and high-dose melphalan as a conditioning regimen for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (NCT02780609). DisclosuresShain:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Takeda/Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen/Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Baloglu:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Other: stockholder. Nishihori:Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract 289: Melphalan and XPO1 inhibition are synergistic in pre-clinical models of multiple myeloma

Abstract Introduction: Multiple myeloma (MM) accounts for about 10% of all hematologic malignancies, with estimated numbers of new cases and deaths for 2015 in the US at 26,850 and 11,240, respectively. Significant increases in response/survival have been seen over the past several years; however, MM remains incurable and patients ultimately die from progressive disease refractory to anti-myeloma therapy. There is clearly a need for additional effective therapies. Materials and Methods: Human MM parental and melphalan (MEL) resistant cell lines were treated with XPO1 inhibitors (XPO1i) KPT330 or KPT8602 +/- MEL and assayed for apoptosis and viability by flow cytometry. Treated cells were assayed for DNA damage by comet assay and phospho-H2AX protein expression. XPO1/MEL treated cells were assayed for p53, NFkB, IKKα, FANCF, and FANCL by Western blot. Cells from patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM treated with XPO1i/MEL were assayed for apoptosis. NOD/SCID-gamma mice with MM tumors were treated with XPO1i/MEL and assayed for tumor growth, survival, and toxicity. Results: MM cell viability was decreased synergistically and apoptosis increased by XPO1I/MEL treatment in all MM cell lines tested. XPO1/MEL drug combination significantly increased DNA damage when compared to either MEL or XPO1 alone, as shown by comet assay and increased phospho-H2AX expression. Western blot showed that XPO1i treatment of MM cells increased p53 and decreased NFkB, IKKα, FANCF, and FANCL. MEL-resistant MM cell lines were found to be sensitized by XPO1i to MEL as shown by apoptosis assay (20-fold). CD138+/light chain+ MM cells from newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory MM patients were also sensitized (5-10 fold) by XPO1i to MEL (apoptosis assay). NOD/SCID-gamma mice challenged with MM tumors demonstrated a strong synergistic antitumor effect in XPO1i/MEL-treated mice, with increased survival and no significant toxicity. Conclusions: XPO1i's improved the response of human MM cell lines and patient MM cells to MEL in vitro and ex vivo. It is possible that this synergy may be due to increased nuclear p53 in combination with decreased NFkB and IKKα and decreased DNA repair proteins FANCL and FANCF reversing MEL resistance by the Fanconi Anemia/BRCA pathway. These preliminary data suggest that XPO1i's augment MEL-induced DNA damage and may also block the repair of the DNA damage—both of which could result in synergistic cell kill. Combination therapies using XPO1i, especially the clinical compounds KPT330 (selinexor) and KPT8602 +/- MEL, may significantly improve the treatment outcomes of MM. Citation Format: Joel G. Turner, Jana L. Dawson, Daniel M. Sullivan. Melphalan and XPO1 inhibition are synergistic in pre-clinical models of multiple myeloma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 289.

A 13 mer LNA-i-miR-221 Inhibitor Restores Drug Sensitivity in Melphalan-Refractory Multiple Myeloma Cells.

The onset of drug resistance is a major cause of treatment failure in multiple myeloma. Although increasing evidence is defining the role of miRNAs in mediating drug resistance, their potential activity as drug-sensitizing agents has not yet been investigated in multiple myeloma. Here we studied the potential utility of miR-221/222 inhibition in sensitizing refractory multiple myeloma cells to melphalan. miR-221/222 expression inversely correlated with melphalan sensitivity of multiple myeloma cells. Inhibition of miR-221/222 overcame melphalan resistance and triggered apoptosis of multiple myeloma cells in vitro, in the presence or absence of human bone marrow (BM) stromal cells. Decreased multiple myeloma cell growth induced by inhibition of miR-221/222 plus melphalan was associated with a marked upregulation of pro-apoptotic BBC3/PUMA protein, a miR-221/222 target, as well as with modulation of drug influx-efflux transporters SLC7A5/LAT1 and the ABC transporter ABCC1/MRP1. Finally, in vivo treatment of SCID/NOD mice bearing human melphalan-refractory multiple myeloma xenografts with systemic locked nucleic acid (LNA) inhibitors of miR-221 (LNA-i-miR-221) plus melphalan overcame drug resistance, evidenced by growth inhibition with significant antitumor effects together with modulation of PUMA and ABCC1 in tumors retrieved from treated mice. Taken together, our findings provide the proof of concept that LNA-i-miR-221 can reverse melphalan resistance in preclinical models of multiple myeloma, providing the framework for clinical trials to overcome drug resistance, and improve patient outcome in multiple myeloma.

Proteolytic Targeting Chimeric Molecules (PROTACs) Specific for Bromodomain-Containing Protein (BRD) 4 Are Active Against Pre-Clinical Models of Multiple Myeloma

Background:BRD4, a bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) family member, has an important role in modulating the expression of essential oncogenes such as c-MYC, and is emerged as a promising therapeutic target in diverse cancer types. Pharmacologic BET inhibitors in development such as JQ1 and OTX015 display preclinical anti-myeloma activity, and induce preferential loss of BRD4 bound to super-enhancers leading to transcriptional repression of c-MYC. Another approach to target this pathway is through the use of bi-functional molecules, which incorporate a small molecule BRD4 binding moiety with an E3 ubiquitin ligase recognition motif, such as ARV-825 and dBET1 (Lu et al. Chem Biol. 22:755, 2015, Winter et al. Science 348:1376, 2015). These agents induce Cereblon (CRBN)-dependent BRD4 ubiquitination and then proteasome-mediated degradation, thereby also reducing downstream c-MYC protein levels.Methods:We performed pre-clinical studies in myeloma cell lines and primary samples using ARV-825 and ARV-763, which are PROTACs that target BRD4 to either the CRBN or the Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) E3 ligases, respectively. Downstream effects were studied using viability and apoptosis assays, cell cycle profiling, and Western blotting, among others.Results:Tetrazolium assays showed that both PROTACs were able to reduce the viability of a panel of myeloma cell lines, including MM1.S, U266, RPMI 8226, ANBL-6, KAS-6/1, and OPM-2 cells, and this occurred with greater potency than was the case for the BRD4 inhibitors JQ1 or OTX015. Median inhibitory concentrations were 5.66-91.98 nM for ARV-825, and 13.22-1522 nM for ARV-763, respectively. This reduction in viability was both time- and concentration-dependent, and was associated with a reduction of cells in the S phase, and an increase in G0/G1 cells, as well as cells with sub-G0/G1 DNA content, suggesting the onset of apoptosis. Programmed cell death was indeed found to be induced based on the appearance of an increase in Annexin V-positive cells by flow cytometry, and in cleaved caspase 8, caspase 9, caspase 3, and poly-ADP-ribose polymerase by Western blotting. The latter was associated with a specific reduction in the expression levels of both BRD4 and c-MYC that did not influence the abundance of other cellular proteins that were not BRD4 targets, and in a reduction in BRD4 and c-MYC mRNA. In contrast, JQ1 and OTX015 exposure resulted in a slight increase in BRD4 protein expression and a lesser decrease of c-MYC protein. Studies of drug combinations showed that, as expected, lenalidomide and pomalidomide were antagonistic to the effects of the CRBN-targeted ARV-825 PROTAC, but these immunomodulatory drugs showed additive or synergistic effects in combination with the VHL-targeted agent ARV-763. Also as expected, bortezomib and carfilzomib reduced the ability of both ARV-825 and ARV-763 to induce BRD4 degradation, but enhanced anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects were seen in a manner that was influenced by the sequence of drug addition. In studies of drug-resistant cell lines, both PROTACs were able to overcome dexamethasone, melphalan, lenalidomide, and bortezomib resistance, but cross-resistance was seen in RPMI 8226/Dox40 cells, suggesting that these compounds are substrates for P-glycoprotein, which is over-expressed in these cells. Finally, we tested BRD4 PROTACs in primary cells isolated from patients with multiple myeloma, and observed rapid loss of viability of these plasma cells.Conclusions:Taken together, our data demonstrate that BRD4 degraders have promising activity against pre-clinical models of multiple myeloma, and support their translation to the clinic for patients with relapsed/refractory disease. Additional combination and mechanistic studies, as well as data from ongoing in vivo studies, will be presented at the meeting. DisclosuresLu:Arvinas, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Qian:Arvinas, LLC: Employment, Equity Ownership. Orlowski:Acetylon: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Consultancy; BioTheryX, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Abstract 4434: Selinexor and melphalan combination therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma

Abstract Introduction High-dose melphalan (MEL) followed by autologous stem cell transplant remains the standard of care for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). However, patients eventually develop drug resistance and die from progressive disease despite newer therapies using proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. The incurable nature of MM demonstrates the need for novel treatments. Our aim was to investigate whether MEL therapy could be improved by the addition of the XPO1 inhibitor selinexor (SEL) in drug-resistant and parental MM cells both in vitro and ex vivo. Materials and Methods SEL/MEL-treated human MM cells were assayed for cell viability (CT-Blue) and apoptosis by flow cytometry (activated caspase 3). Proximity ligation assays (PLD) were used to assess if XPO1-p53 binding was inhibited by SEL. Western blots of SEL-treated MM cells were performed for nuclear and total p53. MEL-resistant U266 (LR6) and 8226 (LR5) MM cell lines were developed by incremental exposure to MEL. MEL resistant and parental MM cells were treated in vitro with SEL +/- MEL and assayed for apoptosis and cell viability. Cells isolated from patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed MM, were treated with SEL +/- MEL and assayed for apoptosis. Results MM cell viability was decreased synergistically by SEL when used in combination with MEL, as shown by combination index (CI) values. Drug sequencing assays showed that concurrent treatment with MEL (10 μM) and SEL (300 nM) for 48 hours produced synergistic results in human H929 MM cells (CI value 0.079, n = 3). Sequential treatment, SEL for 24 hours followed by MEL for an additional 24 hours or the reverse sequence, also demonstrated synergy with CI = 0.208 (n = 3) and 0.142 (n = 3), respectively. Normal PBMCs (control) were unaffected by SEL/MEL treatment as shown by viability and apoptotic assays. PLD demonstrated that SEL blocks XPO1/p53 binding. Western blot data showed that the SEL treatment of MM cells increased nuclear and total p53. Drug-resistant LR5 and LR6 MM cells were found to be resistant to MEL when compared to parental cell lines. Both resistant MM cell lines were sensitized by SEL to MEL as shown by apoptosis assay (20-fold). CD138+/light chain+ MM cells derived from newly diagnosed and relapsed MM patients were also sensitized (5 to 10-fold) by SEL to MEL as demonstrated by apoptosis assay. Conclusions SEL synergistically improved the response of drug-resistant and parental MM cells to MEL in vitro and ex vivo. It is possible that this synergy may be due to an increase of nuclear p53 by SEL and the reported activation of p53 by MEL. Ongoing studies include in vitro experiments to investigate whether this drug combination reverses MEL resistance by the Fanconi Anemia/BRCA pathway, in vivo treatment of MM in NSG mice with SEL/MEL and a clinical trial using high-dose MEL in combination with SEL. Combination therapies using SEL and MEL may significantly improve the treatment outcomes of MM. Citation Format: Joel G. Turner, Jana L. Dawson, Christopher Cubitt, Taiga Nishihori, Claudio Anasetti, Melissa Alsina, Rachid C. Baz, Michael Kauffman, Sharon Shacham, William S. Dalton, Daniel M. Sullivan. Selinexor and melphalan combination therapy for the treatment of multiple myeloma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4434. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4434

Modulation of cell metabolic pathways and oxidative stress signaling contribute to acquired melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells.

Alkylating agents are widely used chemotherapeutics in the treatment of many cancers, including leukemia, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, sarcoma, lung, breast and ovarian cancer. Melphalan is the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent against multiple myeloma. However, despite a 70–80% initial response rate, virtually all patients eventually relapse due to the emergence of drug-resistant tumour cells. By using global proteomic and transcriptomic profiling on melphalan sensitive and resistant RPMI8226 cell lines followed by functional assays, we discovered changes in cellular processes and pathways not previously associated with melphalan resistance in multiple myeloma cells, including a metabolic switch conforming to the Warburg effect (aerobic glycolysis), and an elevated oxidative stress response mediated by VEGF/IL8-signaling. In addition, up-regulated aldo-keto reductase levels of the AKR1C family involved in prostaglandin synthesis contribute to the resistant phenotype. Finally, selected metabolic and oxidative stress response enzymes were targeted by inhibitors, several of which displayed a selective cytotoxicity against the melphalan-resistant cells and should be further explored to elucidate their potential to overcome melphalan resistance.

Enhancement of melphalan activity by buthionine sulfoximine and electroporation in melanoma cells.

Melphalan represents the reference drug for locoregional chemotherapy of melanoma; nevertheless, treatment failure may occur because of resistance to chemotherapy. Refractory melanoma cells show either an increased capability of drug inactivation, which is known to be associated with elevated intracellular levels of glutathione (GSH), or a decreased melphalan uptake. The aim of this study was to explore a biochemical and a biophysical strategy, and their combination, to overcome melphalan resistance in melanoma cells. The biochemical strategy was based on the treatment of melanoma cells with DL-buthionine (S,R)-sulfoximine (BSO) to deplete the GSH levels, thus reducing melphalan inactivation. In the biophysical strategy, cell membrane electroporation was used to increase melphalan uptake. The SK-MEL 28-resistant human melanoma cell line was pretreated with 50 μmol/l BSO for 24 h and then treated with increasing melphalan doses, with or without electroporation. Spectrophotometric quantification of cell viability was used to determine melphalan cytotoxicity. Intracellular total GSH was measured using a kinetic enzymatic assay. BSO induced 3.50-fold GSH depletion in untreated cells and a similar reduction was also maintained in melphalan-treated cells. BSO pretreatment produced a 2.46-fold increase in melphalan cytotoxicity. Electroporation increased melphalan cytotoxicity 1.42-fold. The combination of both BSO pretreatment with melphalan plus electroporation led to a 4.40-fold increase in melphalan cytotoxicity compared with melphalan alone. Pretreatment with BSO and cell membrane permeabilization by electroporation enhanced the cytotoxic activity of melphalan in melanoma cells. Their rational combination deserves further investigation and may improve the efficacy of locoregional chemotherapy of melanoma.