Melanoma Histology Research Articles

Dosimetric and Clinical Prognostic Factors in Single-Isocenter Linac-Based Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases.

Background/Objectives: To report on predictive factors in Linac-based SRT for single and multiple BM. Methods: Consecutive patients receiving either one or three fractions of single-isocenter coplanar VMAT SRT were retrospectively included. The GTV-PTV margin was 1-2 mm. The delivered target dose was estimated by recalculating the original plans on roto-translated CT according to errors recorded by post-treatment CBCT. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated local progression-free survival (LPFS), intracranial progression-free survival (IPFS), and overall survival (OS). Log-rank and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney tests evaluated inter-group differences, whereas Cox regression analysis assessed prognostic factors. Results: Fifty females and fifty males, with a median age of 69 years, received 107 SRTs. A total of 213 BM (range, 1-10 per treatment) with a median volume of 0.22 cc were irradiated with a median minimum BED of 59.5 Gy. The median delivered GTV D95 reduction was -0.3%. The median follow-up was 11 months. Nineteen LP events and a 1-year LC rate of 90.1% were observed. The GTV coverage did not correlate with LC, while the GTV volume was a risk factor for LP, with the 1-year rate dropping to 73% for volumes ≥ 0.88 cc. The median LPFS, IPFS, and OS were 6, 5, and 7 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that patients with melanoma histology and those receiving a second or subsequent systemic therapy line had the worst outcomes, whereas patients with adenocarcinoma histology and mutations showed better results. Conclusions: The accuracy and efficacy of the Linac-based SRT approach for BM were confirmed, but the dose distribution alone failed to predict the treatment response, suggesting that other factors must be considered to maximize SRT outcomes.

Divergent effects of acute and chronic PPT1 inhibition in melanoma

ABSTRACT Macroautophagy/autophagy-lysosome function promotes growth and survival of cancer cells, making them attractive targets for cancer therapy. One intriguing lysosomal target is PPT1 (palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1). PPT1 inhibitors derived from chloroquine block autophagy, have significant antitumor activity in preclinical models and are being developed for clinical trials. However, the role of PPT1 in tumorigenesis remains poorly understood. Here we report that in melanoma cells, acute siRNA or pharmacological PPT1 inhibition led to increased ferroptosis sensitivity and significant loss of viability, whereas chronic PPT1 knockout using CRISPR-Cas9 produced blunted ferroptosis that led to sustained viability and growth. Each mode of PPT1 inhibition produced lysosome-autophagy inhibition but distinct proteomic changes, demonstrating the complexity of cellular adaptation mechanisms. To determine whether total genetic loss of Ppt1 would affect tumorigenesis in vivo, we developed a Ppt1 conditional knockout mouse model. We then crossed it into the BrafCA, PtenloxP, Tyr:CreERT2 melanoma mouse model to investigate the impact of Ppt1 loss on tumorigenesis. Loss of Ppt1 had no impact on melanoma histology, time to tumor initiation, or survival of tumor-bearing mice. These results suggest that chemical PPT1 inhibitors produce different adaptations than genetic PPT1 inhibition, and additional studies are warranted to fully understand the mechanism of chloroquine derivatives that target PPT1 in cancer.Abbreviations: 4-HT: 4-hydroxytamoxifen; BRAF: B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase; cKO: conditional knockout; CRISPR-Cas9: clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated protein 9; DC661: A specific PPT1 inhibitor; DMSO: dimethyl sulfoxide; Dox; doxycycline hyclate; Easi-CRISPR: efficient additions with ssDNA inserts-CRISPR; GNS561/ezurpimtrostat: A PPT1 inhibitor; Hug: human guide; iCas: inducible CRISPR-Cas9; KO: knockout; LC-MS/MS: Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; LDLR: low density lipoprotein receptor; NFE2L2/NRF2: NFE2 like bZIP transcription factor 2; NT: non-target; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homolog; PPT1: palmitoyl-protein thioesterase 1; RSL3: RAS-selective lethal small molecule 3; SCRIB/SCRB1: scribble planar cell polarity protein; Tyr:CreERT2: tyrosinase-driven Cre recombinase fused with the tamoxifen-inducible mutant ligand binding domain of the human estrogen receptor; UGCG: UDP-glucose ceramide glucosyltransferase; WT: wild-type.

Response of treatment-naive brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery

With improvements in survival for patients with metastatic cancer, long-term local control of brain metastases has become an increasingly important clinical priority. While consensus guidelines recommend surgery followed by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for lesions >3 cm, smaller lesions (≤3 cm) treated with SRS alone elicit variable responses. To determine factors influencing this variable response to SRS, we analyzed outcomes of brain metastases ≤3 cm diameter in patients with no prior systemic therapy treated with frame-based single-fraction SRS. Following SRS, 259 out of 1733 (15%) treated lesions demonstrated MRI findings concerning for local treatment failure (LTF), of which 202 /1733 (12%) demonstrated LTF and 54/1733 (3%) had an adverse radiation effect. Multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size (>1.5 cm) and melanoma histology were associated with higher LTF rates. Our results demonstrate that brain metastases ≤3 cm are not uniformly responsive to SRS and suggest that prospective studies to evaluate the effect of SRS alone or in combination with surgery on brain metastases ≤3 cm matched by tumor size and histology are warranted. These studies will help establish multi-disciplinary treatment guidelines that improve local control while minimizing radiation necrosis during treatment of brain metastasis ≤3 cm.

Assessment of Social Vulnerabilities of Care and Prognosis in Adult Ocular Melanomas in the US.

Prior works have studied the impact of social determinants on various cancers but there is limited analysis on eye-orbit cancers. Current literature tends to focus on socioeconomic status and race, with sparse analysis of interdisciplinary contributions. We examined social determinants as measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), quantifying eye and orbit melanoma disparities across the United States. A retrospective review of 15,157 patients diagnosed with eye-orbit cancers in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1975 to 2017 was performed, extracting 6139 ocular melanomas. SVI scores were abstracted and matched to SEER patient data, with scores generated by weighted averages per population density of county's census tracts. Primary outcome was months survived, while secondary outcomes were advanced staging, high grading, and primary surgery receipt. With increased total SVI score, indicating more vulnerability, we observed significant decreases of 23.1% in months survival for melanoma histology (p<0.001) and 19.6-39.7% by primary site. Increasing total SVI showed increased odds of higher grading (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.43) and decreased odds of surgical intervention (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.96). Of the four themes, higher magnitude contributions were observed with socioeconomic status (26.0%) and housing transportation (14.4%), while lesser magnitude contributions were observed with minority language status (13.5%) and household composition (9.0%). Increasing social vulnerability, as measured by the CDC SVI and its subscores, displayed significant detrimental trends in prognostic and treatment factors for adult eye-orbit melanoma. Subscores quantified which social determinants contributed most to disparities. This lays groundwork for providers to target the highest-impact social determinant for non-clinical factors in patient care.

Determinants of Symptomatic Intracranial Progression After an Initial Stereotactic Radiosurgery Course

Purpose: Clinical and imaging surveillance of patients with brain metastases (BMs) is important after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), as many will experience intracranial progression (ITCP) requiring multidisciplinary management. The prognostic significance of neurologic symptoms at the time of ITCP is poorly understood. Materials/MethodsThis was a multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study from 2015-2020, including all patients with BMs completing an initial course of SRS. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) by presence of neurologic symptoms at ITCP. OS, freedom from ITCP (FF-ITCP), and freedom from symptomatic ITCP (FF-SITCP) were assessed via Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazard models tested parameters impacting FF-ITCP and FF-SITCP. Results: Among 1383 patients, median age was 63.4 years, 55% were female, and common primaries were non-small cell lung (49%), breast (15%), and melanoma (9%). At a median follow up of 8.72 months, asymptomatic and symptomatic ITCP were observed in 504 (36%) and 194 (14%) patients respectively. The majority of ITCP were distant ITCP (79.5%). OS was worse with SITCP (median 10.2 vs 17.9 months, p<0.001). SITCP was associated with clinical factors including total treatment volume (P = 0.012), melanoma histology (P = 0.001), prior WBRT (P = 0.003), number of brain metastases (P < 0.001), interval of 1-2 years from primary and brain metastasis diagnosis (P = 0.012), controlled extracranial disease (P = 0.042), and receipt of pre-SRS chemotherapy (P = 0.015). Patients who were younger and received post-SRS chemotherapy (P = 0.001), immunotherapy (P < 0.001), and targeted or small-molecule inhibitor therapy (P < 0.026) had better FF-SITCP. Conclusions: In this cohort study of BM patients completing SRS, neurologic symptoms at ITCP is prognostic for OS. This data informs post-SRS surveillance in clinical practice as well as future prospective studies needed in the modern management of BMs.

Multi-institutional experience of MR-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy for adrenal gland metastases

PurposeWhile dose escalation is associated with improved local control (LC) for adrenal gland metastases (AGMs), the proximity of gastrointestinal (GI) organs-at-risk (OARs) limits the dose that can be safely prescribed via CT-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The advantages of magnetic resonance-guided SBRT (MRgSBRT), including tumor tracking and online plan adaptation, facilitate safe dose escalation. MethodsThis is a multi-institutional review of 57 consecutive patients who received MRgSBRT on a 0.35-T MR linac to 61 AGMs from 2019 to 2021. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and LC, and the Cox proportional hazards model was utilized for univariate analysis (UVA). ResultsMedian follow up from MRgSBRT was 16.4 months (range [R]: 1.1–39 months). Median age was 67 years (R: 28–84 years). Primary histologies included non-small cell lung cancer (N = 38), renal cell carcinoma (N = 6), and melanoma (N = 5), amongst others. The median maximum diameter was 2.7 cm (R: 0.6–7.6 cm), and most AGMs were left-sided (N = 32). The median dose was 50 Gy (R: 30–60 Gy) in 5–10 fractions with a median BED10 of 100 Gy (R: 48–132 Gy). 45 cases (74 %) required adaptation for at least 1 fraction (median: 4 fractions, R: 0–10). Left-sided AGMs required adaptation in at least 1 fraction more frequently than right-sided AGMs (88 % vs 59 %, p = 0.018). There were 3 cases of reirradiation, including 60 Gy in 10 fractions (N = 1) and 40 Gy in 5 fractions (N = 2). One-year LC, PFS, and OS were 92 %, 52 %, and 78 %, respectively. On UVA, melanoma histology predicted for inferior 1-year LC (80 % vs 93 %, p = 0.012). There were no instances of grade 3+ toxicity. ConclusionsWe demonstrate that MRgSBRT achieves favorable early LC and no grade 3 + toxicity despite prescribing a median BED10 of 100 Gy to targets near GI OARs.

Relationship of Histopathologic Parameters and Gene Expression Profiling in Malignant Melanoma.

Histopathologic characteristics (HC) are a mainstay in melanoma prognosis; gene expression profiling (GEP) has emerged as a potential additional independent value. To elucidate HC predictive of groups obtained via GEP of malignant melanoma. A retrospective study analyzing HC of 265 melanomas submitted for GEP over the course of 8years. GEP was conducted as a part of regular clinicopathologic workup through Castle Biosciences Decision Dx®. Of the 265 cases, the major HC found to have an association with reported gene expression profiles were melanoma histology subtype, depth of invasion, and presence of ulcer. This study is limited by its cross-sectional nature. Causation and long-term related outcomes of the use of GEP versus American Joint Committee on Cancer histopathologic staging cannot be ascertained by this design. An association, but no definitive prediction, exists between histopathologic categories of depth of invasion, melanoma subtype, and presence or absence of ulcer and gene expression profiles. GEP adds valuable data to the evaluation of malignant melanomas that cannot be definitively predicted by conventional models. The findings add to needed groundwork for comparison of traditional markers and molecular genotyping and begins to build a robust predictive model for better outcomes in patients with malignant melanoma.

Low-Dose Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases in the Era of Modern Systemic Therapy.

Dose selection for brain metastases stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) classically has been based on tumor diameter with a reduction of dose in the settings of prior brain irradiation, larger tumor volumes, and critical brain location. However, retrospective series have shown local control rates to be suboptimal with reduced doses. We hypothesized that lower doses could be effective for specific tumor biologies with concomitant systemic therapies. This study aims to report the local control (LC) and toxicity when using low-dose SRS in the era of modern systemic therapy. We reviewed 102 patients with 688 tumors managed between 2014 and 2021 who had low-margin dose radiosurgery, defined as ≤14 Gy. Tumor control was correlated with demographic, clinical, and dosimetric data. The main primary cancer types were lung in 48 (47.1%), breast in 31 (30.4%), melanoma in 8 (7.8%), and others in 15 patients (11.7%). The median tumor volume was 0.037cc (0.002-26.31 cm 3 ), and the median margin dose was 14 Gy (range 10-14). The local failure (LF) cumulative incidence at 1 and 2 years was 6% and 12%, respectively. On competing risk regression analysis, larger volume, melanoma histology, and margin dose were predictors of LF. The 1-year and 2-year cumulative incidence of adverse radiation effects (ARE: an adverse imaging-defined response includes increased enhancement and peritumoral edema) was 0.8% and 2%. It is feasible to achieve acceptable LC in BMs with low-dose SRS. Volume, melanoma histology, and margin dose seem to be predictors for LF. The value of a low-dose approach may be in the management of patients with higher numbers of small or adjacent tumors with a history of whole brain radio therapy or multiple SRS sessions and in tumors in critical locations with the aim of LC and preservation of neurological function.

Image analysis of cutaneous melanoma histology: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The current subjective histopathological assessment of cutaneous melanoma is challenging. The application of image analysis algorithms to histological images may facilitate improvements in workflow and prognostication. To date, several individual algorithms applied to melanoma histological images have been reported with variations in approach and reported accuracies. Histological digital images can be created using a camera mounted on a light microscope, or through whole slide image (WSI) generation using a whole slide scanner. Before any such tool could be integrated into clinical workflow, the accuracy of the technology should be carefully evaluated and summarised. Therefore, the objective of this review was to evaluate the accuracy of existing image analysis algorithms applied to digital histological images of cutaneous melanoma.Database searching of PubMed and Embase from inception to 11th March 2022 was conducted alongside citation checking and examining reports from organisations. All studies reporting accuracy of any image analysis applied to histological images of cutaneous melanoma, were included. The reference standard was any histological assessment of haematoxylin and eosin-stained slides and/or immunohistochemical staining. Citations were independently deduplicated and screened by two review authors and disagreements were resolved through discussion. The data was extracted concerning study demographics; type of image analysis; type of reference standard; conditions included and test statistics to construct 2 × 2 tables. Data was extracted in accordance with our protocol and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA) Statement. A bivariate random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Assessment of methodological quality was conducted using a tailored version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. The primary outcome was the pooled sensitivity and specificity of image analysis applied to cutaneous melanoma histological images. Sixteen studies were included in the systematic review, representing 4,888 specimens. Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The mean sensitivity and specificity of automated image analysis algorithms applied to melanoma histological images was 90% (CI 82%, 95%) and 92% (CI 79%, 97%), respectively. Based on limited and heterogeneous data, image analysis appears to offer high accuracy when applied to histological images of cutaneous melanoma. However, given the early exploratory nature of these studies, further development work is necessary to improve their performance.

Melanoma in Iranian Childhood and Adolescence: An Analysis of 14 Patients

Background: Skin cancer is the most common cancer in Iran. Given the importance of early diagnosis in treating early tumors, knowledge of the demographic and pathological findings of the disease is helpful. Objectives: The aim of present study was to investigate the incidence, trend and risk factors of melanoma in Iranian childhood and adolescents. Methods: The present retrospective study was performed between 2005 and 2013 on registered data in the National Cancer Registry System, Iran. The age group studied was patients 18 years or younger. Data included demographic status, risk factors, clinical and histopathological characteristics, and stage. Results: The results showed that 8 (57.1%) of 14 patients were males. The mean age of the study population was 8.71 ± 6.02 years (range, 1-15 years). Ten (71.4%) patients were of Fars ethnic groups. In terms of tumor invasiveness, 13 (92.9%) patients were invasive and one (7.1%) patient was in situ. The growth phase of melanoma was vertical in 13 (92.9%) patients and radial phase in one (7.1%) patient. In terms of lymph node metastasis, it was observed in only one patient. Surgical treatment was performed on all patients. Melanoma histology was nodular in 3 patients and unspecified or unregistered in the rest. The most area of the tumor was in the head/neck and lower limbs. Conclusions: According to the results, regardless of the differences in the specific coverage of the Iranian people, the distribution and statistical characteristics of malignant melanoma in Iran are almost similar to other countries in the world. Wider studies are recommended to confirm the findings of the present study.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Deep Learning Applications for Histological Assessment of Cutaneous Melanoma.

Melanoma is among the most devastating human malignancies. Accurate diagnosis and prognosis are essential to offer optimal treatment. Histopathology is the gold standard for establishing melanoma diagnosis and prognostic features. However, discrepancies often exist between pathologists, and analysis is costly and time-consuming. Deep-learning algorithms are deployed to improve melanoma diagnosis and prognostication from histological images of melanoma. In recent years, the development of these machine-learning tools has accelerated, and machine learning is poised to become a clinical tool to aid melanoma histology. Nevertheless, a review of the advances in machine learning in melanoma histology was lacking. We performed a comprehensive literature search to provide a complete overview of the recent advances in machine learning in the assessment of melanoma based on hematoxylin eosin digital pathology images. In our work, we review 37 recent publications, compare the methods and performance of the reviewed studies, and highlight the variety of promising machine-learning applications in melanoma histology.

Interplay between Tumor Mutational Burden and Mutational Profile and Its Effect on Overall Survival: A Pilot Study of Metastatic Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Solid tumors harboring tumor mutational burden (TMB) ≥10 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb) received agnostic approval for pembrolizumab. This work aims to analyze the somatic mutational profile's influence on the outcomes of patients with TMB-high tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This post-hoc analysis evaluated clinical and molecular features of patients with solid tumors treated with ICIs that could be either monoclonal antibody directed against programmed cell death protein-1 or monoclonal antibody directed against programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1), monoclonal antibody directed against cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen (anti-CTLA-4) or a combined treatment regimen including one anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 and one anti-CTLA-4 (ICIs combination). We performed OS analysis for TMB thresholds of ≥10, ≥20, and &lt;10 mut/Mb. We assessed OS according to the mutational profile for a TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb cutoff. For genes correlated with OS at the univariate assessment, we conducted a Cox multivariate analysis adjusted by median TMB, sex, age, microsatellite instability (MSI), and histology. A total of 1661 patients were investigated; 488 with a TMB ≥10 mut/Mb (29.4%). The median OS was 42 months for TMB ≥10 or 20 mut/Mb, and 15 months for TMB &lt;10 mut/Mb (p &lt; 0.005). Among TMB ≥10 mut/Mb patients, mutations in E2F3 or STK11 correlated with worse OS, and mutations in NTRK3, PTPRD, RNF43, TENT5C, TET1, or ZFHX3 with better OS. These associations were confirmed with univariate and multivariate analyses (p &lt; 0.05). Melanoma histology and TMB above the median endowed patients with better OS (p &lt; 0.05), while MSI status, age, and gender did not have a statistically significant effect on OS. Combining TMB and mutation profiles in key cancer genes can better qualify patients for ICI treatment and predict their OS.

Risk Factors for Progression and Toxicity after Preoperative Radiosurgery for Resected Brain Metastases: A PROPS-BM Multicenter Cohort Study

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> Preoperative (preop) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a feasible alternative to postoperative (postop) SRS with potential benefits in adverse radiation effect (ARE) and meningeal disease (MD) compared to postop SRS. The goal of this study was to determine risk factors for progression and toxicity after preop SRS in an expanded multicenter cohort. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Patients with brain metastases (BM) from solid cancers, of which at least 1 lesion was treated with preop SRS and underwent planned resection were included from 6 institutions. SRS to synchronous intact BM was allowed. Exclusion criteria included classically radiosensitive or non-solid cancers and prior or planned whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT). SRS dose, fractionation, and interval between preop SRS and surgery was per individual institutional protocol. Intracranial outcomes were estimated using cumulative incidence with competing risk of death. Radiographic MD was categorized as nodular (nMD) or classical "sugarcoating" (cMD). <h3>Results</h3> The cohort consisted of 378 patients with 389 preop SRS treated index lesions. Most patients (61.1%) had a single BM, underwent gross total resection (GTR, 95.4%), and had non-small cell lung (NSCLC, 47.9%), breast (16.1%), or melanoma (11.4%) cancer. Median dose was 15 Gy in 1 fraction to a median gross tumor volume (GTV) of 10.1 cc. Median interval between preop SRS and surgery was 2 days. Median cranial imaging follow-up interval was 9.5 months overall and 17.5 months for alive patients. The 2-year cavity local recurrence (LR) rate was 14.5%. Multivariable analysis (MVA) for LR demonstrated subtotal resection (STR, vs. GTR), single fraction SRS (vs. fractionated), larger GTV, gastrointestinal (GI) primary (vs. NSCLC), active systemic disease, and piecemeal resection (vs. en bloc) to be associated with higher risk of LR. Of note, interval between preop SRS and surgery was not significant. The 2-year any grade ARE rate was 7.7%. MVA for ARE demonstrated only larger planning target volume (PTV) margin expansion as associated with higher risk of ARE. The 2-year rate of MD was 5.6%. Most MD (76%) was classical type, with the remainder being nodular type. MVA for MD demonstrated STR (vs. GTR) and breast or melanoma histology (vs. NSCLC) as associated with higher risk of MD. Of note, posterior fossa location and type of surgical resection were not significant. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Preop SRS demonstrates overall excellent rates of cavity LR, ARE, and MD in this expanded multicenter cohort study. We have identified several tumor and treatment factors that are significantly associated with risk of cavity LR, ARE, and MD after treatment with preop SRS. Minimizing likelihood of STR and treating with fractionated preop SRS for larger higher risk tumors may lead to improved outcomes. A randomized trial of preop versus postop SRS is currently being designed (NRG BN012).

Multi-Institutional Experience of MR-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Adrenal Gland Metastases

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> While dose-escalation is associated with improved local control (LC) for adrenal gland metastases (AGM), the proximity of gastrointestinal (GI) structures limits the dose that can be safely prescribed via CT-based stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The relative advantages of magnetic resonance guided SBRT (MRgSBRT), including tumor tracking, treatment under breath hold, and online plan adaptation, create the potential for safe dose escalation. The present study investigated the efficacy and safety of MRgSBRT for treatment of AGMs across multiple institutions. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> This is a multi-institutional retrospective review of 57 consecutive patients who underwent MRgSBRT on a 0.35-T MR Linac to 61 AGMs from April 2019 to September 2021. Univariate analysis (UVA) with the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method was used to estimate time-to-event outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and LC, with group differences compared by log-rank testing. Median follow up was calculated with the reverse KM method. <h3>Results</h3> Median follow up was 12.2 months (95% CI 8.1-17.2 months). Median age at the time of SBRT was 67 years (range: 28-84 years). Primary histologies included non-small cell lung cancer (N=38), renal cell carcinoma (N=6), and melanoma (N=5), amongst others. Most AGMs were left-sided (N=32) with a median maximum diameter of 2.7cm (range: 0.6-7.6cm) treated to a median total dose of 50 Gy (range: 30-60 Gy) in 5-10 fractions with a median BED₁₀ 100 Gy (range: 48-132 Gy). Forty-five cases (74%) required adaptation, more frequently in left-sided lesions due to the proximity of the stomach and small bowel (88% vs 59%). There were 3 cases of reirradiation, including 60 Gy in 10 fractions (N=1) and 40 Gy in 5 fractions (N=2). One-year LC, PFS, and OS were 90%, 40%, and 76%, respectively. On UVA, only melanoma histology predicted for inferior 1-year LC (53% vs 92%, <i>p</i>=0.022). There was a nonsignificant improvement in LC for BED₁₀ of 132 Gy (1-year LC 100% vs 87%, <i>p</i>=0.148). No patients who received BED₁₀ 132 Gy (N=13) experienced local failure. There were no instances of grade 3+ acute or late toxicity. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Our early outcomes demonstrate MRgSBRT achieves favorable LC and no grade 3+ toxicity despite prescribing a median BED₁₀ of 100 Gy to targets in proximity of GI organs at risk. The unique advantages of MR guidance and online adaptive replanning may be especially beneficial for achieving safe dose escalation of radioresistant histologies such as melanoma.

Molecular Mechanisms Driving the Formation of Brain Metastases.

Simple SummaryBrain metastases are the most common brain tumor in adults and are associated with poor prognosis. The propensity of different solid tumors to metastasize varies greatly, with lung, breast, and melanoma primary tumors commonly leading to brain metastases, while other primaries such as prostate rarely metastasize to the brain. The molecular mechanisms that predispose and facilitate brain metastasis development are poorly understood. In this review, we present the current data on the genomic landscape of brain metastases that arise from various primary cancers and also outline potential molecular mechanisms that drive the formation of distant metastases in the brain.Targeted therapies for cancers have improved primary tumor response rates, but concomitantly, brain metastases (BM) have become the most common brain tumors in adults and are associated with a dismal prognosis of generally less than 6 months, irrespective of the primary cancer type. They most commonly occur in patients with primary breast, lung, or melanoma histologies; however, they also appear in patients with other primary cancers including, but not limited to, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. Historically, molecular biomarkers have normally been identified from primary tumor resections. However, clinically informative genomic alterations can occur during BM development and these potentially actionable alterations are not always detected in the primary tumor leading to missed opportunities for effective targeted therapy. The molecular mechanisms that facilitate and drive metastasis to the brain are poorly understood. Identifying the differences between the brain and other extracranial sties of metastasis, and between primary tumors and BM, is essential to improving our understanding of BM development and ultimately patient management and survival. In this review, we present the current data on the genomic landscape of BM from various primary cancers which metastasize to the brain and outline potential mechanisms which may play a role in promoting the formation of the distant metastases in the brain.

Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision for eyelid melanoma: An analysis of a national database

Although eyelid melanomas represent less than 1% of eyelid neoplasms, they have the worst prognosis. Wide local excision (WLE) and Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) are mainstay treatment options. We conducted a retrospective analysis to assess all-cause and cause-specific mortality rates in patients undergoing WLE or MMS for eyelid melanoma. A retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry was performed for eyelid melanoma treated with WLE or MMS. Cases were limited to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage T1 primary malignancies. A total of 45 cases of WLE were identified along with 48 cases of MMS for eyelid melanoma. There was no significant difference between subgroups in age group, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status at diagnosis, AJCC N stage, AJCC M stage, melanoma histology, chemotherapy use, and radiotherapy use. Among the cohort, all tumors were unilateral. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank demonstrated no significant difference between MMS and WLE subgroups with regard to overall survival (P=0.662) and cancer-specific survival (P=0.494). Cox regression adjusting for variables with α<0.10 and found no significant difference in all-cause mortality (HR, 0.923; 95% CI 0.310-2.747; P=0.885) or cancer-specific mortality (HR, 0.518; 95% CI 0.047-5.711; P=0.591) when patients who underwent MMS were compared to those who underwent WLE. While our study is limited by a small number of patients, our analysis demonstrated no significant difference in all-cause or cause-specific survival for patients with eyelid melanoma treated with MMS compared with WLE. In areas requiring preservation of tissue due to cosmetic or functional purposes, MMS is a reasonable surgical approach.

Impact of radiotherapy schedule on survival of patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors for advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer

PurposePreclinical and clinical data suggest a potential benefit in the addition of radiotherapy (RT) to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) during the treatment of advanced cancers. Nevertheless, the ideal patients for this approach and the optimal RT regimen is still debated. Material and methodsThe aim of this study was to determine the effect RT schedule has on survival for advanced non-small cell lung cancer and melanoma patients (pts) treated with ICI (anti-PD1 or anti-CTLA4) and concomitant RT. ResultsA total of 58 pts were identified, of which 26 received RT concomitantly with ICI while the remaining 32 pts were treated with RT at the time of progression under ICI. The RT parameters associated with outcome include dose per fraction, biological effective dose, RT to all targets and lung irradiation. Independent predictors of improved progression-free survival were lung irradiation, melanoma histology, oligometastatic status (<6 metastasis), presence of liver metastasis, PNN<7000/mm3 and normal LDH. Independent predictors of improved overall survival were melanoma histology and normal LDH. Among pts who were irradiated at progression, 68.7% had an overall clinical benefit and had a median extension of ICI use by 2.3 months (range: 0-29.1), among which 2 presented with an abscopal effect. ConclusionsThe irradiation of lung metastases may increase survival in patients under ICI. RT at progression could prolong the use of ICI, and neutrophilia and LDH should be considered during patient selection of this combined RT/ICI approach.

Association between tumor mutational burden (TMB) and mutational profile and its effect on overall survival: A post hoc analysis of patients with TMB-high and TMB-low metastatic cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

2632 Background: High-TMB was recently approved as an agnostic biomarker for pembrolizumab in advanced cancers. Still, several patients with high-TMB do not respond to ICI, while some patients with low-TMB benefit from immunotherapy. Methods: We collected genomic (MSK-IMPACTassay) and survival data from 1,661 patients and assessed OS (Kaplan-Meier method) according to the mutational status. To better qualify patients with TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb (TMB-H) (N = 488, 29%) and TMB &lt; 10 mut/Mb (TMB-L) (N = 1,173, 71%) for ICI treatment, we analyzed single gene alterations impacting OS (P &lt; 0.05). For all genes exhibiting a correlation with OS, we conducted a Cox multivariate analysis stratified by median TMB, sex, median age, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and histology. Results: Survival to ICI increased with higher TMB. Median OS was 42 and 15 months for TMB-H and TMB-L (P &lt; 0.05), respectively. For TMB-H tumors, 5 genes ( STK11, KEAP1, CIC, E2F3, TP53) exhibited reduced OS on ICI, and 22 genes ( NTRK3, TERT, NOTCH3, RNF43, TET1, PTPRD, NCOA3, TENT5C, ZFHX3, RIT1, CCNE1, PPM1D, GATA2, ALK, DNMT1, PTPRT, MET, EPHA7, BCL6, SMO, CDK6, MED12) were associated with better OS, P &lt; 0.05. Cox multivariate analysis confirmed a correlation between mutations in STK11 and E2F3 with worse OS, while mutations in NTRK, PTPRD, RNF43, TENT5C, TET1, and ZFHX3 were associated with better OS (P &lt; 0.05). Histology did not play a relevant role in ICI response except for melanoma (better OS; P &lt; 0.05). MSI status did not significantly affect OS. For TMB-L tumors, 20 genes were related with reduced OS ( TP53, H3C2, DAXX, SMARC4, STK11, SOX17, RB1, PIK3CA, CTNNB1, KMT2D, HLA-A, FBXW7, CDH1, RBM10, KEAP1, IGF1R, H3C11, EGFR, RUNX1, B2M), while 8 genes were associated with better OS ( VHL, SETD2, PBRM1, BRAF, KDM5C, MAP2K1, CSF1R, RET), P &lt; 0.05. Cox multivariate analysis confirmed 15 genes associated with superior ( KDM5C, PBRM1, and VHL) and inferior ( CTNNB1, DAXX, FBXW7, H3C2, H3C1, IGF1R, KMT2D, PIK3CA , RB1, SMARC4, SOX17, TP53) OS (P &lt; 0.05). In the TMB-L context, melanoma histology and MSI status (except among VHL-mutated tumors) were independently associated with better OS. Conclusions: This pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that genomic alterations in single cancer genes can help define outcomes of TMB-H and TMB-L patients treated with ICI. [Table: see text]

Outcomes in surgical management of sinonasal malignancy-A single comprehensive cancer center experience.

Sinonasal malignancies are a complex and diverse group of tumors. Over the past five decades, treatment advances have changed the management paradigms for these tumors. Our aim was to analyze the outcomes of patients from a comprehensive cancer center. We retrospectively assessed 400 patients with sinonasal malignancies treated with surgery at our center between 1973 and 2015. Multiple variables were reviewed to assess the influence on 5-year outcomes. The median age was 56 years (IQR 46.8-68). Two hundred and fifty-nine (65%) were males and 141 (35%) were females. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) improved in the last analyzed decade. Orbital invasion, advanced pT-classification and pN-classification, and melanoma histology were associated with poorer outcomes. Treatment outcomes for patients with sinonasal malignancy have improved over time. This is likely multifactorial with advances in surgical technique, adjuvant treatment, and patient selection. pT-classification, pN-classification, orbital invasion, and histology are predictive of survival.

Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brainstem Metastases: A Systematic Review and Comparative Meta-Analysis

Unchecked growth of brainstem metastases (BSM) can lead to acute morbidity and death. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) remains the only local therapy for BSM, but the safety and efficacy of this approach are not fully understood, partly because BSM patients are excluded from many clinical trials. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of studies of SRS for BSM in the context of prospective trials of SRS or molecular/targeted therapy for non-brainstem brain metastases (BM).A comprehensive search of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed on 12/6/19 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify relevant studies of SRS for BSM, and prospective trials of SRS or molecular/targeted therapy for BM. Outcomes included 1-year local control (LC), objective response rate (ORR, defined as partial or complete response), 1-year overall survival (OS), neurologic death rate, and CTCAE 4.0 grade 3-5 adverse events. Pooled binomial proportions were estimated using a random effects model. Study heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and τ using the maximum likelihood method and the Wald test.A total of 32 retrospective studies with a study level median follow up of 8.5 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5.7-11.0) were identified comprising 1446 patients undergoing SRS for 1590 B.M.. Median BSM volume was 0.40cm3 (study level IQR 0.20-1.05cm3), and SRS treatments were delivered using fixed-frame radiosurgery (73.8%, median dose 16 Gy, range 6-30 Gy, median isodose 50%), linear accelerator (17.2%, median dose 13.7 Gy, range 11.1-39.0 Gy in 1-13 fractions, median isodose 85%), or robotic-arm radiosurgery (9%, median 17.5 Gy, range 16-24 in 1-5 fractions, median isodose 80%). Pooled 1-year LC was 86% (95% CI 83-88%, I2 = 38%), 1-year OS was 33% (30-37%, I2 = 35%), and the rate of grade 3-5 toxicity was 2.4% (1.5-3.7%, I2 = 33%). On univariate meta-regression, melanoma histology (coefficient 4.26, QM = 4.15, P = 0.042) and prior or concurrent WBRT (coefficient 1.62, QM = 3.98, P = 0.046) were associated with higher grade 3-5 toxicity from SRS for BSM. Deaths from BSM progression after SRS were rare (2.7%), and the neurologic death rate in BSM patients (24%, 19-31%, I2 = 62%) was not statistically different from the neurologic death rate in BM patients who were treated on prospective SRS trials (21%, 13-32%, I2 = 90%, N = 6 trials, Q = 0.36, P = 0.55). The pooled rate of ORR of 59% (47-71%, I2 = 88%) for SRS of BSM compared favorably to the wide range of intracranial ORR reported for molecular therapies (17-56%).SRS for BSM is safe and effective, and the potential for acute morbidity or death from growth of untreated BSM is significant. The data here suggest SRS for BSM should be considered upon or prior to clinical trial enrollment of molecular/targeted therapy for BM.W.C. Chen: None. U. Baal: None. J.D. Baal: None. J. Pai: None. H. Vasudevan: Research Grant; Children's Tumor Foundation. Patent/License Fees/Copyright; Genentech, Eli Lilly. L. Boreta: None. S.E. Braunstein: Advisory Board; Radiation Oncology Questions, LLC.D. Raleigh: None.