Medicine Educational Research Research Articles

Social Determinants of Health Education Within Family Medicine Clerkships: A CERA Study

Background and Objectives: Social determinants of health (SDoH) education has gained popularity in undergraduate medical education; however, emphasis varies, and the curricula or assessment methods are not uniform. This study sought to examine the current SDoH teaching and assessment methods within family medicine clerkships and to identify characteristics associated with SDoH curriculum with multicomponent (two or more) teaching strategies and higher Kirkpatrick levels of assessment (Level 3-behavior change and Level 4-results). Methods: An online survey was conducted through the 2023 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) Clerkship Directors Survey. Results: The survey response rate was 56.8% (96/169). The degree of SDoH emphasis in the medical school was positively associated with the number of teaching strategies (r=0.48; P<.001). We found a trend toward degree of SDoH emphasis being associated with higher Kirkpatrick levels of assessment (H[3]=7.83; P=.05). Having an SDoH faculty champion was associated with more teaching strategies (F[1,77]=8.73; P=.004), more types of assessments (F[1,78]=5.88; P=.018), and higher Kirkpatrick levels of assessment (H[1]=4.46; P=.035). Underrepresented in medicine clerkship director identity was not associated with the number of teaching strategies or higher Kirkpatrick levels of assessment. Conclusions: Greater degrees of SDoH emphasis and having a faculty champion were associated, or trended toward association, with multicomponent teaching strategies and higher Kirkpatrick levels of assessment, which prepare students to provide SDoH responsive care that could lead to reduction in health inequities.

Climate Change Curricula in Family Medicine Residency Programs: Program Directors' Perspectives From a CERA Survey.

Climate change is a major threat to the health of people worldwide. The health care system deals with the immediate health-related effects of climate change and, at the same time, is a major emitter of greenhouse gas. This study aimed to investigate (a) the awareness and perception of climate change among family medicine residency program directors, and (b) the state of climate change education in family medicine residency programs. The Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) conducted a cross-sectional survey of family medicine program directors in the United States in April 2023. We analyzed anonymous data using descriptive and bivariate statistics. We analyzed responses from 284 family medicine residency program directors (response rate 41.1%). Of these, 56.8% indicated not having any lectures/seminars dedicated to climate change and no plans to introduce such curricula, with considerably higher rates in East South Central United States (92.8%). A majority considered principles of climate change, carbon emissions emitted by the health care system, and discussion of climate change with patients of lesser importance for residency program education. While climate change is an emerging topic affecting health and the provision of health care worldwide, our study suggests that many family medicine residency programs do not teach about it. Family medicine trainees may not always receive sufficient education about the risks posed to their patients by climate change, which could lead to them having limited knowledge and skills when discussing this topic with their patients in the future.

Holistic Review in Family Medicine Residency Programs: A CERA Study.

Interest in using holistic review for residency recruitment as a strategy to improve the diversity of the physician workforce has increased. However, no data are published on the prevalence of holistic review in the selection process for family medicine residency programs. We designed this study to assess programs' knowledge, skills, and attitudes; prevalence; barriers to implementation; and program characteristics associated with the use of holistic review. Data for this study were elicited as part of a 2023 survey conducted by the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance. The nationwide, web-based survey was sent to 739 family medicine residency program directors. A total of 309 program directors completed the holistic review portion of the survey. Programs that understood and agreed with holistic review used it more in their selection process. Holistic review was more common in programs with higher rates of residents, faculty, and patients that are underrepresented in medicine. Barriers to holistic review utilization were increased number of applicants, increased resources associated with holistic review, and lack of consensus on the holistic review approach. The holistic review process is an area of growing interest to diversify the physician workforce, especially among residencies caring for underresourced communities. Further discussions on the specific scoring rubrics of family medicine residency programs that use holistic review are needed and could help programs that are facing barriers. Widespread use of holistic review to diversify the physician workforce has the potential to improve patient care access and health.

Trends in the Study of Korean Medicine Education : Based on domestic and international research

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to review trends in Korean medical education research.Method: We searched Korean Medicine Education research in 4 domestic and 4 international datebases. The studies were analyzed with journal, year, keyword and detailed topic, word frequency in research context, divided into four categories: basic Korean medicine, clinical Korean medicine, medical humanities, education.Result: 128 Korean studies and 30 International studies, total 158 studies, published from 1993 to 2024 have been selected. Research on Korean medicine education has been consistently published every year since 2003, by 61 journals. The period when the most papers were published was 2020, with 16 papers. Journal of Physiology & Pathology in Korean Medicine published a relatively large number of studies, with 19. Among the keywords divided into 4 categories according to Institute of Korean Medicine Education & Evaluation, studies related to 'basic medicine' were the most with 45 cases. When classified into detailed topics, there were 40 papers related to 'subject', and 21 papers related to ‘awareness’.Discussion and Conclusion: The study suggests that Korean medicine education method and curriculum should be developed. As educational research and method progresses, the corresponding curriculum has to be improved and applied to the field. This study would contribute to the foundation of Korean medicine education.

Identification and Accommodation of ADHD in Family Medicine Residencies: A CERA Study.

An increasing number of medical students applying to residency programs request accommodations for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Early implementation of accommodations for individuals with ADHD during family medicine (FM) residency could help learners and programs, but the number of programs prepared to invite learners to disclose ADHD and to implement accommodations is unclear. The purpose of this study was to describe practices employed by FM residency programs to identify residents who need accommodations for ADHD. We also chose to examine the frequency with which basic categories of ADHD accommodations are used and whether review of technical standards (ie, resident job description) is associated with timing of accommodations. We analyzed responses from the 2022 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) national survey of FM residency program directors, which was distributed via email invitation to all US programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. A total of 298 program directors (44.3%) responded. Approximately one in six FM residency programs are proactive in their identification of learners with ADHD, typically recognizing the need for accommodations during the interview process or orientation. Once the need is identified, most programs implement accommodations within 1 month, and many employ multiple types of accommodations. While a small subset of programs has developed processes to identify and accommodate ADHD proactively, results suggested that the majority of programs approach accommodation processes on an ad hoc basis. In turn, ad hoc identification precludes a proactive approach, given use of poor performance to identify the need for supports.

Administrative Time Expectations for Residency Core Faculty: A CERA Study.

Academic family medicine (FM) physicians aim to balance competing needs of providing clinical care with nonclinical duties of program administration, formal education, and scholarly activity. FM residency is unique in its scope of practice, clinical settings, and training priorities, which may differ between university-based and community-based programs. In both types of programs, these competing needs are a source of faculty dissatisfaction and burnout. We performed this study to explore the allocation of nonclinical administrative full-time equivalents (FTE) for FM residency core faculty members. Reported nonclinical administrative FTE time allocation is equivalent between university/medical school-based and community-based programs. The ideal proportion of FTE distribution identified by DCs had greater amounts of direct clinical care compared to greater emphasis on precepting time identified by PDs. DCs and PDs agreed that administrative time should be used for advising residents, curriculum development and delivery, and evaluation of resident performance. Barriers to allocating additional administrative time for DCs included loss of revenue and pressure by hospital-level leadership. PDs responded that the need for clinical supervision of residents was most significant. We performed our research through a cross-sectional survey of FM department chairs (DC) and residency program directors (PD) conducted by the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance. We used descriptive statistics to characterize the data and Pearson's χ2 tests to evaluate bivariate relationships. DCs and PDs offer a similar ideal picture of core responsibilities, though subtle differences remain. These differences should be considered for the next revision of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education minimum program standards to best meet the needs of all FM programs.

Protocol for the 2023 CERA Department Chair Survey.

CERA, the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance, is a program sponsored by the academic family medicine organizations with the goal of supporting and improving educational research in family medicine. CERA produces surveys of different groups in academic family medicine, including an annual survey of department chairs, and members can apply to add their question sets to these surveys. This article describes the methods and demographics of the 2023 CERA Department Chair Survey. The call for proposals for the CERA Department Chair Survey was open from April 3, 2023 through May 9, 2023. Fifteen proposals were received, and five were accepted for the final survey based on scoring by peer reviewers. The Institutional Review Board of the American Academy of Family Physicians approved the survey. The final survey, including question sets from five research teams and standard demographic questions, was sent to 227 department chairs in the United States and Canada. Overall, 114 chairs responded to the survey, for a response rate of 50.2%. Demographic variables, including race/ethnicity, gender, age, and region of the country, did not differ between respondents and nonrespondents. The CERA Department Chair Survey provides a framework for members of academic family medicine organizations to conduct survey research on topics that are important to the specialty. Advantages of the CERA process include a national sample and robust response rate. Disadvantages are primarily the limitation in number of survey questions and the fact that not all proposals are accepted.

Family Medicine Resident Education About Health Disparities Associated With Incarceration: A CERA Research Study.

We submitted research questions to the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) to assess the format of family medicine resident education about health disparities associated with incarceration and the perceived efficacy of efforts to prepare graduates for competent care of formerly incarcerated patients in practice. We think this is a universal problem, and current efforts are insufficient. We evaluated data as part of the fall 2022 CERA survey of program directors (PDs). We reviewed descriptive statistics, generated comparative analysis, and reported relational analysis. We analyzed internal structure with principal component analysis and inter-item reliability. A total of 286 out of 678 (42%) eligible PDs completed the survey. Most respondents felt that educating residents about health disparities associated with incarceration was important and that residents would welcome that education. However, PDs lacked existing curricula. PDs did not think that medical school graduates were well-prepared in this area, and ambivalence existed about whether residency graduates were well-prepared to treat formerly incarcerated patients upon graduation. Comparative analysis revealed differences in responses based on the type of program, the program and community size, and the PD demographics. PDs acknowledged the importance of training residents about health disparities associated with incarceration and about care for formerly incarcerated patients in practice. However, they identified a gap between what was currently offered and what is needed to impact perception of resident readiness upon graduation. This training was felt to be most important in university-based programs with 31+ residents in US communities of greater than 150,000 people. We found no difference based on geographic location.

HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Education in Family Medicine Clerkships: A CERA Study.

Little is known about human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) education in family medicine clerkships during medical school. Our study aimed to describe coverage of PrEP education in family medicine clerkships and explore barriers if this education was absent. Data were collected through the 2023 Council of Academic Family Medicine (CAFM) Education Research Alliance (CERA) Family Medicine Clerkship Director Survey. We inquired about provision of PrEP to patients, faculty expertise with PrEP, PrEP curriculum in the clerkship, barriers to including PrEP in the clerkship curriculum, and willingness of directors to add PrEP online modules to the clerkship if available. The response rate was 56.8% (96/169). Nine participants did not complete the PrEP questions and were excluded from analyses. Nearly two-thirds of clerkship directors perceived PrEP as an important topic in the family medicine clerkship; however, only one-third of clerkships included PrEP curriculum through clinical experiences (58.5%), didactics (17.1%), or both (14.6%). Barriers to including PrEP were lack of time in the curriculum (63.5%) and having other more important topics to cover (25.7%), but 38.9% said they would include PrEP in the clerkship if free online modules were available. Clerkships were more likely to include PrEP curriculum in the family medicine clerkship if they had faculty with sufficient expertise or if clerkship directors believed it was important to teach PrEP in the curriculum. Offering accessible educational content can enhance educational opportunities on PrEP for medical students.

Family Medicine Clinician Screening and Barriers to Communication on Food Insecurity: A CERA General Membership Survey.

Food insecurity (FI) is a hidden epidemic associated with worsening health outcomes affecting 33.8 million people in the US in 2021. Although studies demonstrate the importance of health care clinician assessment of a patient's food insecurity, little is known about whether Family Medicine clinicians (FMC) discuss FI with patients and what barriers influence their ability to communicate about FI. This study evaluated FM clinicians' food insecurity screening practices to evaluate screening disparities and identify barriers that influence the decision to communicate about FI. Data were gathered and analyzed as part of the 2022 Council of Academic Family Medicine's Educational Research Alliance survey of Family Medicine general membership. The majority of respondents reported (66.9%) that their practice has a screening system for food insecurity, and most practices used a verbal screen with staff other than the clinician (41%) at specific visits (63.8%). Clinicians reported "rarely or never asking about FI" 40% of the time and only asking "always or frequently" 6.7% of the time. Inadequate time during appointments (44.5%) and other medical issues taking priority (29.4%) were identified as the most common barriers. The lack of resources available in the community was a significant barrier for clinicians who worked in rural areas. This survey provides insight into food insecurity screening disparities and identifies obstacles to FMC screening, such as time constraints, lack of resources, and knowledge of available resources. Understanding current communication practices could create opportunities for interventions to identify food insecurity and impact "Food as Medicine."

CERA: Advancing Family Medicine Education Research.

CERA: Advancing Family Medicine Education Research.

Family Medicine Residency Program Directors' Perception of Curricular Elements Related to Autism: A CERA Study.

The family medicine (FM) approach to health care across the life span is well-suited to providing care for persons living with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Little is known about ASD curricula in FM residency training and the characteristics of FM residency programs that prepare their residents to care for persons with this disorder. Our study questions were part of a larger omnibus survey by the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) with data collection from November 16 to December 18, 2022, from FM residency program directors (PDs). ASD curricula were investigated using 10 questions, with descriptive analyses and nonparametric comparisons between program variables and ASD curriculum. The response rate was 42.18%, with FM PDs reporting that their programs were preparing residents in the care of youth (71.53%) and adults (68.33%) with ASD, but to a lesser extent (58.89%) in facilitating transitions of care. Programs with faculty champions, access to published curricula, sufficient patients with ASD, and engagement of interprofessional faculty reported a higher proportion of resident preparedness. PDs of community-based programs were most confident in their ability to teach ASD care and transitions of care. Most FM PDs modestly agreed that they are preparing residents to provide care to patients with ASD and their families. PDs of programs with greater access to resources (ie, published curriculum, faculty champions, sufficient patients with ASD, interprofessional faculty experts) believed that their residents were more prepared. Community-based FM educators may help lead the way in providing models for care and education in this regard.

Protocol for the 2023 CERA General Membership Survey.

CERA, the Council of Academic Family Medicine (CAFM) Educational Research Alliance, represents a unique collaboration between family medicine organizations, conducting annual surveys of distinct groups within family medicine. CERA's mission is to support family medicine educational research. This paper presents the methods and demographic results of the 2023 General Membership Survey. CERA's call for proposals for the annual General Membership Survey opened from June 2023 to July 2023. We received 16 proposals, and after a peer review process, five topics were accepted. Each author was assigned a research mentor. Because all the accepted proposals targeted physicians, the survey was distributed to select members of the CAFM organizations via SurveyMonkey from November 20, 2023 through December 22, 2023. We used χ2 and Fisher's exact tests for analysis. The final pool size was 3,598. Eight-hundred thirty-three members completed the survey, for a response rate of 23.2% (833/3,598). Demographic data of potential survey respondents were compared with data of actual respondents. There were no significant differences in gender, location and underrepresented in medicine status. Actual survey respondents were slightly older, less likely Asian, and more likely to have a doctor of medicine (MD) or combined doctorate degree compared to potential survey respondents. This paper describes the methods of the 2023 CERA General Membership Survey. The 2023 survey focused on active physicians. The demographics of the survey respondents differed slightly from potential respondents. Authors of the five accepted survey topics are responsible for publishing their study findings.

Family physicians and menstrual care: An analysis of CERA 2023.

Menstrual health is an important indicator of overall health and has large impacts on quality of life. Despite number and impact, discussion of menstruation remains largely taboo within health care. Patients and physicians are not engaging in regular, meaningful discussions on menstruation. Family physicians, as primary care providers, can facilitate these important conversations. We sought to understand the profile of menstrual care providing family physicians and assessed physician comfort, knowledge, training, and perceived importance regarding menstrual care. This is a cross-sectional analysis of the 2022 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance survey. The survey included actively practicing US physicians who are members of the Council of Academic Family Medicine organizations. Descriptive demographic statistics were calculated; chi-square tests were generated for menstrual care-specific items; logistic regression models were fit to determine the association between receiving formal menstrual care training, importance of physician training in menstrual care, and demographic factors. Eighty-five percent of respondents report frequently providing menstrual care. Participants of younger age, or who had earned their degree more recently, were significantly more likely to provide frequent menstrual care. Respondents who earned their medical degree at an earlier year were significantly more likely to believe that physician training in menstrual care was of limited importance (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00, 1.03). Our findings show that family physicians are providing menstrual care, despite non-uniform training, and recognize its importance to patients. By understanding physician profile and the care they provide, we can work toward comprehensive physician education in menstrual care and providing appropriate menstrual care to patients.

Using Zoom Annotate to Facilitate Online Focus Groups in Veterinary Medicine Education Research

Focus groups allow researchers to collect data from multiple participants on a set of questions while simultaneously observing participant interactions during sessions. Traditionally, researchers conduct focus groups in person, though online focus groups have been increasingly used as technologies have improved. The pandemic increased the need for researchers to innovate online focus group practices. This paper aims to present best practices for using annotation functions on digital video conference platforms to conduct focus group interviews in veterinary medicine education research. We explain how Zoom, specifically its Annotate functions, offers a useful tool to facilitate online focus groups and assist veterinary medicine education research and practice. This method addresses many of the challenges that in-person focus groups have—dominant participants, geographical barriers, and confidential (instead of anonymous) participation—while still being able to collect quality data during a group interview. The best practices described here allow for capturing both qualitative and quantitative data from online participants while preserving their anonymity and increasing the ease of participation. Based on data we have collected, participants report being comfortable providing honest and direct responses across a variety of questions. This practice also allows the collection of simultaneous or delayed answers, which means that participants have more flexibility in how and when they respond compared to many in-person focus groups. This practical approach to online focus group research can assist in conducting veterinary medicine education research not just during the pandemic but whenever geographical barriers or a need for increased confidentiality are researcher concerns.

Impact of COVID-19 on American Family Physicians' Intent to Retreat from Clinical Care.

This survey evaluated whether the COVID-19 pandemic was a traumatic stress event for family physicians associated with burnout, changes in life priorities, and intentions to retreat from clinical practice. We report on 683 clinically active family physicians surveyed through the Council of Academic Family Medicine's Educational Research Alliance (CERA) in the fall of 2021. Overall, 35.2% of family physicians experienced the pandemic as a traumatic stress like event. This was associated with changing life priorities (OR 2.6, CI 1.8-3.9), burnout (OR 1.6, CI 1.1 to 2.4), and withdrawal from clinical practice in various ways. Those who changed their priorities in life were more likely to restrict scope of practice (OR 3.9, CI 2.6-5.9), reduce clinical work effort (OR 3.4, 2.3 to 5.1), relocate (OR 3.1, CI 2.0 to 4.8), retire (OR 2.7, CI 1.4-4.9), reroute their career away from patient care (OR 2.1, CI 1.4-3.1) and less likely to avoid redesigning the practice to improve well-being (OR 0.3, CI 0.2-0.7). Those who experienced burnout were more likely to retire (OR 5.5, CI 2.8 to 10.5), reduce clinical work effort (OR 4.2, CI 2.9-6.1), reroute their career away from patient care (OR 3.9, CI 2.6-5.8), relocate (OR 3.8, CI 2.4 to 5.9), and restrict scope of practice (OR 3.3, CI 2.3 to 4.9). Overall, 48.5% of family physicians expressed some intention to retreat from clinical practice. The COVID-19 pandemic impacted family physician's career plans. Remedying burnout is a high-yield opportunity for retaining clinically active family physicians. Physicians retreating from clinical medicine related to changing life's priorities needs further exploration.

Motivational Interviewing Education in North American Family Medicine Clerkships: A CERA Study.

Many health conditions are preventable or modifiable through behavioral changes. Motivational interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based communication technique that explores a patient's reasons for behavioral changes. This study assesses the current landscape of MI training in North American Family Medicine (FM) clerkships. We analyzed data gathered as part of the 2022 Council of Academic Family Medicine's Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey of FM clerkship directors (CDs). The survey was distributed via email invitation to 159 US and Canadian FM CDs in June 2022. Of the 94 responses received, 61% indicated that MI training is provided in their FM clerkship. Medical school type, class size, and location were associated with MI training priority, offerings, and duration in the clerkship, respectively. CD experience correlated with MI training duration; student MI skill training level was associated with MI training duration and priority; the rigor of student MI skills evaluation was correlated with MI teaching methods and training duration; self-reported student MI competency was associated with the length of time students spent with FM community preceptors as well as MI training priority and teaching methods; and several items emerged as predictors of student, CD, and FM faculty MI training expansion. Opportunities exist to enhance the volume, content, and rigor of MI training in North American FM clerkships as well as to improve self-reported student MI competency within those clerkships.

Eye on the Prize: Patient Outcomes Research in Medical Education.

The overarching goal of medical education is to train clinicians who achieve and maintain competence in patient care. Although the field of medical education research has acknowledged the importance of education on clinical practices and outcomes, most research endeavors continue to focus on learner-centered outcomes, such as knowledge and attitudes. The absence of clinical and patient-centered outcomes in pulmonary and critical care medicine medical education research has been attributed to barriers at multiple levels, including financial, methodological, and practical considerations. This Perspective explores clinical outcomes relevant to pulmonary and critical care medicine educational research and offers strategies and solutions that educators can use to accomplish what many consider the "prize" of medical education research: an understanding of how our educational initiatives impact the health of patients.

Comparing Resident and Program Director Perspectives on Wellness Curricula: A CERA Study.

Mitigating the stress of graduate medical education has been the focus of residency leadership in the United States. This study examined family medicine (FM) resident and program director (PD) satisfaction with current wellness curricula, including perceptions of availability of resources and emphasis on well-being. The Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance administered online surveys to PDs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, US-based FM residencies, and resident American Academy of Family Physicians members from April to May 2021. The present study included an assessment of wellness curriculum implementation using the Wellness Element Count (WEC), a satisfaction rating with wellness programming, and a single question assessing perceived changes in emphasis on wellness during COVID-19. A total of 242 residents (5% response rate) and 263 PDs (42% response rate) completed the survey. Residents reported lower WEC indicators compared to PDs (P<.001). Overall, 67.8% of resident respondents were satisfied with their program's wellness efforts, compared to 89.3% of PDs ( P<.001). Perceived emphasis on wellness curricula in the program was associated with greater resident satisfaction (OR=2.75, P<.05); less emphasis on wellness was associated with less resident satisfaction (OR=0.15, P<.001). Residents reported overall lower perceived availability and satisfaction with program wellness efforts compared to PDs, suggesting a disparity between perspectives. Ongoing efforts should be directed at encouraging use of available wellness resources and supporting a culture of well-being.

Protocol for the 2023 CERA Clerkship Director Survey.

CERA, the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance, is a unique collaboration between multiple family medicine organizations to conduct omnibus surveys of distinct groups within family medicine. CERA's vision is to support excellence in family medicine educational research and improve research skills in family medicine. This paper describes the methods of the 2023 Clerkship Directory Survey and presents the demographic results of survey respondents. CERA's call for proposals for the annual Clerkship Directory Survey opened from January 2023 to February 2023. Five topics were selected, and authors of the selected proposals had a mentor assigned to their project. The survey was sent to Clerkship Directors via SurveyMonkey (Momentive, Inc) on May 30, 2023 and responses were collected through June 30, 2023. χ2 tests were used for descriptive analysis. The survey was initially sent to 179 potential respondents but after receiving updated clerkship information, the final pool size was 169 (163 United States, 16 Canada). Ninety-six clerkship directors completed the survey, with a response rate of 56.80% (96/169). The demographic data of potential clerkship director respondents were compared with the demographic data of actual respondents. There were no significant difference in demographic data including location, gender, race/ethnicity and underrepresented in medicine status. This paper describes the methods of the 2023 CERA Clerkship Directory Survey and shows that survey respondents are representative of clerkship directors. Authors of the five accepted survey topics are responsible for publishing their study findings.