Medical Respite Research Articles

National Overview of Nonprofit Hospitals' Community Benefit Programs to Address Housing.

Housing is a critical social determinant of health that can be addressed through hospital-supported community benefit programming. To explore the prevalence of hospital-based programs that address housing-related needs, categorize the specific actions taken to address housing, and determine organizational and community-level factors associated with investing in housing. This retrospective, cross-sectional study examined a nationally representative dataset of administrative documents from nonprofit hospitals that addressed social determinants of health in their federally mandated community benefit implementation plans. We conducted descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to examine hospital and community characteristics associated with whether a hospital invested in housing programs. Using an inductive approach, we categorized housing investments into distinct categories. The main outcome measure was a dichotomous variable representing whether a hospital invested in one or more housing programs in their community. Twenty percent of hospitals invested in one or more housing programs. Hospitals that addressed housing in their implementation strategies were larger on average, less likely to be in rural communities, and more likely to be serving populations with greater housing needs. Housing programs fell into 1 of 7 categories: community partner collaboration (34%), social determinants of health screening (9%), medical respite centers (4%), community social determinants of health liaison (11%), addressing specific needs of homeless populations (16%), financial assistance (21%), and targeting high-risk populations (5%). Currently, a small subset of hospitals nationally are addressing housing. Hospitals may need additional policy support, external partnerships, and technical assistance to address housing in their communities.

Delivering the Right Care, at the Right Time, in the Right Place, From the Right Pocket: How the Wrong Pocket Problem Stymies Medical Respite Care for the Homeless and What Can Be Done About It.

Delivering the Right Care, at the Right Time, in the Right Place, From the Right Pocket: How the Wrong Pocket Problem Stymies Medical Respite Care for the Homeless and What Can Be Done About It.

Addressing healthcare disparities in homeless neurosurgical patients: A comprehensive literature review on strategies for equitable care and improved outcomes.

Homelessness is a growing concern in the US, with 3.5 million people experiencing it annually and 600,000 on any given night. Homeless individuals face increased vulnerability to 30-day hospital readmissions and higher mortality rates, straining the healthcare system and exacerbating existing disparities. This study aims to inform neurosurgeons on evidence-based strategies to reduce readmission and mortality rates among homeless patients by reviewing the literature on the impact of medical respite on 30-day readmission rates. The study aims to gauge the efficacy of medical respite in reducing hospital readmissions and improving health outcomes for homeless individuals. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase/Medline, and Cochrane databases, as well as consulting the National Institute for Medical Respite Care and the Department of Health Care Access and Information. Ten articles were chosen from an initial 296 to investigate the impact of respite programs on readmission rates among homeless patients. Homeless patients experience high readmission rates due to various factors. Interventions such as respite programs and a comprehensive approach to healthcare can lower these rates. Collaboration between hospitals and medical respites has proven particularly effective. Inadequate healthcare for homeless individuals leads to increased readmissions, longer hospital stays, and higher costs. Medical respites are a viable solution, but limited resources hamper their effectiveness. Therefore, it is crucial to facilitate cooperation between hospitals, respites, and other entities. Future research should focus on disparity in neurosurgical procedures and explore alternative services. An interdisciplinary approach is key to addressing healthcare inequalities.

Homelessness And Health: Factors, Evidence, Innovations That Work, And Policy Recommendations.

On a single night in 2023, more than 653,000 people experienced homelessness in the United States. In this overview, we highlight structural and individual risk factors that can lead to homelessness, explore evidence on the relationship between homelessness and health, discuss programmatic and policy innovations, and provide policy recommendations. Health system efforts to address homelessness and improve the health of homeless populations have included interventions such as screening for social needs and medical respite programs. Initiatives using the Housing First approach to permanent supportive housing have a strong track record of success. Health care financing innovations using Medicaid Section 1115 waivers offer promising new approaches to improving health and housing for people experiencing homelessness. To substantially reduce homelessness and its many adverse health impacts, changes are needed to increase the supply of affordable housing for households with very low incomes. Health care providers and systems should leverage their political power to advocate for policies that scale durable, evidence-based solutions to reduce homelessness, including increased funding to expand housing choice vouchers and greater investment in the creation and preservation of affordable housing.

Protocol of a mixed method research design to study medical respite programs for persons experiencing homelessness.

Medical Respite Programs (MRPs) characterize a care model that has been developed to address the health care and social needs of persons experiencing homelessness by providing post-acute hospital care in a safe environment. Although this model has been shown to reduce hospitalizations, improve health outcomes and increase access to health services, prior studies of MRP programs and outcomes have been limited to individual sites and may not generalize to the population of individuals receiving MRP care. This study protocol describes a mixed method design to collect organizational, provider, and patient-level data from a sample of MRPs.

Provider perceptions of challenges and facilitators to surgical care in unhoused patients: A qualitative analysis

BackgroundUnhoused patients have worse surgical outcomes than the general population. However, the drivers of this inequity have not been studied. MethodsWe conducted 26 semi-structured interviews of clinicians who care for patients with surgical disease, using a purposive sampling strategy to intentionally recruit participants with significant experience caring for unhoused patients across different roles. We used thematic analysis to analyze the resulting data. ResultsWe conducted 26 interviews: 11 with surgeons (42%), 8 with internal medicine physicians (30%), 2 with surgical advanced practice providers (8%), 3 with social workers or case managers (11%), and 2 with registered nurses (8%). One-third of the participants worked in either medical respite or street medicine programs. We identified 5 themes, each of which was most relevant at a distinct point along the spectrum of surgical care: (1) patients and clinicians face multiple challenges meeting preoperative requirements, (2) although surgeons do not make major operative decisions based on housing status, some take it into consideration for minor care decisions, (3) clinicians perceive that unhoused patients have negative postoperative experiences in the hospital, (4) discharge options for unhoused patients are commonly imperfect, which can lead to inadequate postoperative care, (5) challenges with formal communication between surgeons and non-surgeons are amplified when caring for unhoused patients. ConclusionClinicians who care for unhoused patients with surgical disease relayed multiple challenges throughout all phases of surgical care and relied on both formal and informal mechanisms to mitigate these challenges. There may be opportunities to intervene and improve access to surgical care for this vulnerable group.

Expanding the evidence for cross-sector collaboration in implementation science: creating a collaborative, cross-sector, interagency, multidisciplinary team to serve patients experiencing homelessness and medical complexity at hospital discharge.

Patients with medical and social complexity require care administered through cross-sector collaboration (CSC). Due to organizational complexity, biomedical emphasis, and exacerbated needs of patient populations, interventions requiring CSC prove challenging to implement and study. This report discusses challenges and provides strategies for implementation of CSC through a collaborative, cross-sector, interagency, multidisciplinary team model. A collaborative, cross-sector, interagency, multidisciplinary team was formed called the Buffalo City Mission Recuperative Care Collaborative (RCU Collaborative), in Buffalo, NY, to provide care transition support for people experiencing homelessness at acute care hospital discharge through a medical respite program. Utilizing the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) framework and feedback from cross-sector collaborative team, implementation strategies were drawn from three validated ERIC implementation strategy clusters: 1) Develop stakeholder relationships; 2) Use evaluative and iterative strategies; 3) Change infrastructure. Stakeholders identified the following factors as the main barriers: organizational culture clash, disparate visions, and workforce challenges related to COVID-19. Identified facilitators were clear group composition, clinical academic partnerships, and strategic linkages to acute care hospitals. A CSC interagency multidisciplinary team can facilitate complex care delivery for high-risk populations, such as medical respite care. Implementation planning is critically important when crossing agency boundaries for new multidisciplinary program development. Insights from this project can help to identify and minimize barriers and optimize utilization of facilitators, such as academic partners. Future research will address external organizational influences and emphasize CSC as central to interventions, not simply a domain to consider during implementation.

Evaluation of the implementation of a medical respite program for persons with lived experience of homelessness

ABSTRACT Medical respite programs (MRPs) constitute a potential strategy to improve the continuum of care for persons who have lived experiences of homeless (PWLEH). A MRP was developed in Alberta, Canada, through a partnership between the provincial health authority (Alberta Health Services) and the province’s largest homeless shelter (Calgary Drop-In Centre). We conducted a qualitative study of 25 stakeholders who held an operational, administrative and/or healthcare provider role in the MRP’s design and implementation to evaluate the barriers and facilitators to its implementation using Proctor’s implementation framework. While stakeholders had a common motivation of addressing health inequity, the program’s acceptability and fidelity were hampered by a lack of clear common objectives and expectations. Program adoption was difficult due to differences in organizational policies and priorities. Program staff and leadership were dedicated to the patient population, enhancing feasibility, but the limited training and experience of frontline providers specifically in addictions and mental health resulted in important needs not being met (affecting intervention appropriateness). The lack of integration with community resources, despite being intended as a program to transition patients from hospital to community, affected program penetration. Our findings are relevant for other jurisdictions and organizations aiming to develop and implement similar interventions.

Medical respite posthospitalization for adults experiencing homelessness: Erratum.

Erratum In a manuscript that was published in the March 2023 issue, there were errors in the printed and original version online. • Page 48, “Introduction,” paragraph 3, 1st sentence should read: “This article describes how one community coalition that included nurses as members assessed community needs when no medical respite care was available.” • Page 49, “Participants,” paragraph 1, 3rd sentence should read: “The shelter facility staff recommended these participants to the investigators as meeting those inclusion criteria.” • Page 50, Results, paragraph 1, 3rd sentence should read: “The mean age of these participants was 50 years old.” • Page 50, under “Participants,” should read: “The third group consisted of homeless shelter staff interviewed by the investigators. The researchers followed up on any who volunteered to be interviewed. The homeless shelter directors in the midwestern community were asked through electronic mail from the coalition directors to participate in the study and were interviewed about the experience of receiving guests from healthcare facilities.” These errors have been corrected in the online version of the manuscript. Nursing2023. 53(5):60, May 2023.

Medical respite post-hospitalization for adults experiencing homelessness.

Nurses provide care in various settings and advocate for vulnerable populations. Recognizing the need for follow-up care after hospitalization and mobilizing necessary resources are part of caring for patients, including those experiencing homelessness. This article discusses how one community coalition assessed gaps in care that might be met by establishing medical respite in the community.

Partial-Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Bone and Joint Infections in People With Recent Injection Drug Use.

Limited outcome data exist regarding partial-oral antibiotic therapy, defined as oral antibiotics as part of a patient's treatment, for bone and joint infections (BJIs) in people who inject drugs (PWID). We conducted a retrospective study of all PWID reporting drug use within 3 months and BJIs requiring ≥6 weeks of antibiotics in an urban safety-net hospital between February 1, 2019, and February 1, 2021. Treatment outcomes were assessed by chart review. Rates of failure, defined as death, symptoms, or signs concerning for worsening or recurrent infections, were assessed 90 and 180 days after completion of antibiotics. Univariate logistic regression was used to explore the association between covariates and failure. Of 705 patients with BJI, 88 (13%) were PWID. Eighty-six patients were included in the final cohort. Forty-four (51%) were homeless, 50 (58%) had spine infection, 68 (79%) had surgery, and 32 of 68 (47%) had postoperatively retained hardware. Twelve (14%) of 86 patients received exclusively intravenous (IV) antibiotics, and 74 (86%) received partial-oral antibiotics. Twelve (14%) of 86 patients had patient-directed discharge. In those who received partial-oral antibiotics, the failure rate was 20% at 90 days and 21% at 180 days after completion of intended treatment. Discharge to a medical respite and follow-up with infectious diseases (ID) or surgery were negatively associated with odds of failure. Partial-oral treatment of BJI in PWID was a common practice and often successful when paired with medical respite and follow-up with ID or surgery.

The effect of medical respite services on hospital readmissions for those experiencing homelessness

A clinical decision report using: Kertesz SG, Posner MA, O’Connell JJ, et al. Post-Hospital Medical Respite Care and Hospital Readmission of Homeless Persons. J Prev Interv Community. 2009;37(2):129-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852350902735734 for a patient experiencing homelessness.

Cost-Effectiveness of a Homeless Care Transition Program: Durham Homeless Care Transitions.

BACKGROUND Transitional care and medical respite programs provide assistance to people experiencing homelessness as they move from acute care into community settings. These programs can address issues that may fall outside the reach of traditional medical care yet have a profound impact on the health of vulnerable populations. This article focuses on the cost-effectiveness of the Durham Homeless Care Transitions (DHCT) program.METHOD This intervention study of the DHCT program uses a comparison group of people experiencing homelessness who were referred but did not participate. Encounter-level data, aggregated by quarterly segments of charges and reimbursements, were abstracted for all persons referred. Descriptive statistics were computed and models of charges and reimbursements were created using ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to compare utilization for 12 months pre- and post-referral.RESULTS Patients referred to the DHCT program (N = 485) were primarily non-Hispanic Black (62.5%), male (68.4%), uninsured (35.5%), and had an average of 5.3 chronic conditions and an average age of 50.0 years (SD = 11.3). There was variability among charges and reimbursement based on health care visit type but a negative association between treatment and charges, indicating that being part of the DHCT program led to lower charges post-referral.LIMITATIONS The study is limited by lack of access to line-item details of charges, reimbursement, and payer mix.CONCLUSION There is evidence of benefit to patients from transitional care and medical respite programs that does not substantially increase the overall societal cost of care; however, health systems commonly require evidence of cost savings and benefit as a return on investment.

Development and Implementation of a Medical Respite Program for People Experiencing Homelessness: An Analysis of a Cross-sectoral Partnership.

People with lived experience of homelessness (PWLEH) undergo worse health outcomes despite frequent acute care use, often because their functional and social needs remain unmet. In response, a homeless shelter and the provincial health authority formed a partnership to implement a medical respite program. We describe this collaboration by conducting a qualitative study, interviewing people involved in planning and implementing the program (n=25). Thematic analysis was performed. Stakeholders were motivated by a common desire to address the health inequities experienced by PWLEH, and frontline service providers felt a sense of teamwork. However, due to logistical limitations, an evolution of partnerships, and lack of role clarity, there was no singular program vision, resulting in lack of stakeholder support and conflicts between partner organizations. Health care for PWLEH must be multidisciplinary and cross-sectoral. The synergies and challenges described shed light on how future partnerships can be navigated.

Program Outcomes and Health Care Utilization of People Experiencing Homelessness and Substance Use Disorder after Transitional Care Program Engagement.

People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have a high prevalence of mental illness and substance use disorder (SUD) and substantial acute and chronic disease burden. Transitional care and medical respite programs facilitate a safe transfer for PEH from the acute care to community setting. Many medical respite programs practice harm reduction strategies that can increase the opportunity for positive program outcomes for PEH with SUD. This transitional care and medical respite program evaluation explored program outcomes, health care utilization patterns, and comorbid conditions of persons with and without SUD. People experiencing homelessness with SUD had similar program outcomes and both groups had decreased acute care utilization after program engagement. A high prevalence of trimorbidity, which is associated with early mortality, was noted. Opportunities for harm reduction strategies to promote both social and clinical outcomes are offered.

Hospitalizations for COVID-19 Among US People Experiencing Incarceration or Homelessness

People experiencing incarceration (PEI) and people experiencing homelessness (PEH) have an increased risk of COVID-19 exposure from congregate living, but data on their hospitalization course compared with that of the general population are limited. To compare COVID-19 hospitalizations for PEI and PEH with hospitalizations among the general population. This cross-sectional analysis used data from the Premier Healthcare Database on 3415 PEI and 9434 PEH who were evaluated in the emergency department or were hospitalized in more than 800 US hospitals for COVID-19 from April 1, 2020, to June 30, 2021. Incarceration or homelessness. Hospitalization proportions were calculated. and outcomes (intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV], mortality, length of stay, and readmissions) among PEI and PEH were compared with outcomes for all patients with COVID-19 (not PEI or PEH). Multivariable regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. In total, 3415 PEI (2952 men [86.4%]; mean [SD] age, 50.8 [15.7] years) and 9434 PEH (6776 men [71.8%]; mean [SD] age, 50.1 [14.5] years) were evaluated in the emergency department for COVID-19 and were hospitalized more often (2170 of 3415 [63.5%] PEI; 6088 of 9434 [64.5%] PEH) than the general population (624 470 of 1 257 250 [49.7%]) (P < .001). Both PEI and PEH hospitalized for COVID-19 were more likely to be younger, male, and non-Hispanic Black than the general population. Hospitalized PEI had a higher frequency of IMV (410 [18.9%]; adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.16; 95% CI, 1.04-1.30) and mortality (308 [14.2%]; aRR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11-1.47) than the general population (IMV, 88 897 [14.2%]; mortality, 84 725 [13.6%]). Hospitalized PEH had a lower frequency of IMV (606 [10.0%]; aRR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.58-0.70) and mortality (330 [5.4%]; aRR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.47-0.59) than the general population. Both PEI and PEH had longer mean (SD) lengths of stay (PEI, 9 [10] days; PEH, 11 [26] days) and a higher frequency of readmission (PEI, 128 [5.9%]; PEH, 519 [8.5%]) than the general population (mean [SD] length of stay, 8 [10] days; readmission, 28 493 [4.6%]). In this cross-sectional study, a higher frequency of COVID-19 hospitalizations for PEI and PEH underscored the importance of adhering to recommended prevention measures. Expanding medical respite may reduce hospitalizations in these disproportionately affected populations.

Mixed methods analysis of a national implementation of a medical respite program in transitional housing settings for veterans experiencing homelessness

ABSTRACT Hospital to Housing (H2H) is a Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) program providing medical respite care to veteran's experiencing homelessness. The program partners community organizations providing transitional housing with local VA facilities delivering medical care for post-hospitalization veterans for clinical stabilization and ultimately, permanent housing. The program was launched October 2017 at 43 sites. Using mixed methods, we aim to assess participant health services utilization and community partner perceptions and experiences with the implementation of the program. We collected 90-day pre/post-enrollment health care utilization data for the first 200 H2H enrollees and conducted semi-structured interviews with six community organizations. Veterans enrolled in H2H had a significant decline in utilization of emergency department and inpatient care (67.0% vs. 39.5%, p < 0.01) and a significant increase in primary care utilization (47.5% vs. 78.0%, p < 0.01). The greatest barrier to implementation was concern of patient complexity while the greatest enabler was the perceived value/benefit of the program. Our findings suggest a community-partnered low intensity medical respite model for select lower acuity populations is feasible to operate and can substantially redirect care away from acute care settings and increase primary care and social services engagement.

Homelessness Is an Ethical Issue in America

The National Health Care for the Homeless Council supports clinicians serving 1 million patients per year in 300 Health Care for the Homeless federally qualified health centers and 100 medical respite programs.

Medical Respite Programs for People who Experience Homelessness.

A gap analysis was completed during my internship with the Delaware Academy of Medicine/Delaware Public Health Association (Academy/DPHA). During the gap analysis it was discovered there were no medical respite programs in Delaware for people who experience homelessness. This gap was chosen because there are outcomes via program intervention that show a decrease in hospital admissions, inpatient days, decrease in hospital costs, outpatient visits and increase social services for homeless individuals. A medical respite program for people who experience homelessness aligns with the Academy/DPHA mission because one focus of the organization is community health planning and policy development.1 Utilizing a homeless medical respite program will allow people who experience homelessness in Delaware to have a safe place to recover from a hospital stay.

Rapid Creation of a Multiagency Alternate Care Site for COVID-19- Positive Individuals Experiencing Homelessness.

Cook County Health partnered with the Chicago Departments of Public Health and Family & Support Services and several dozen community-based organizations to rapidly establish a temporary medical respite shelter during the spring 2020 COVID-19 peak for individuals experiencing homelessness in Chicago and Cook County, Illinois. This program provided low-barrier isolation housing to medically complex adults until their safe return to congregate settings. We describe strategies used by the health care agency, which is not a Health Resource and Services Administration Health Care for the Homeless grantee, to provide medical services and care coordination.