Medical Emergency Team Calls Research Articles

Epidemiology and outcome of medical emergency team calls within 48 hours of intensive care unit discharge.

Some patients experience early (within 48 h) clinical deterioration and medical emergency team (MET) review following intensive care unit (ICU) discharge. Few studies have explored early MET review, despite it being a recognised quality and safety indicator. To evaluate the (i) proportion of patients discharged from ICU receiving MET review and timing of reviews; (ii) characteristics of patients who received early MET review and (iii) predictors of early MET review and associations with clinical outcomes. This is a retrospective observational study of ICU discharges over 2 years in a tertiary hospital and involves descriptive and inferential statistics, including logistic regression analysis. Of 3712 patients, 312 (8.4%) had an early MET review. Patients with cardiothoracic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and general surgical diagnoses, higher illness severity or who received invasive ventilation had a higher risk of early MET review. On multivariable analysis, early MET review was associated with an increased risk of ICU re-admission (odds ratio (OR) 6.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.01-9.13, P < 0.001), in-hospital mortality (OR 3.62, 95% CI 2.19-5.99, P < 0.001) and discharge to a nursing home (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.25-4.97, P = 0.01). Length of stay was longer in patients requiring early post-ICU MET review compared to those who did not (median 16 days vs. 10 days, P < 0.001). One in 12 patients received post-ICU early MET review. This was more likely in patients who were invasively ventilated, had higher illness severity and had certain admission diagnoses. Such patients were at risk for worse outcomes. There is a need to identify reversible factors contributing to such increased risk.

Medical Emergency Team call within 24 h of medical admission with a focus on sepsis: a retrospective review.

Clinical deterioration within the first 24 h of patient admission triggering a Medical Emergency Team (MET) call is a common occurrence. A greater understanding of these events, with a focus on the recognition and management of sepsis, could lead to quality improvement interventions. A retrospective observational review of general and subspecialty medical admissions triggering a MET call within 24 h of admission at a quaternary Australian hospital. 2648 MET calls occurred (47.9/1000 admissions), 527 (20% of total MET events, 9.5/1000 admissions) within 24 h of admission, with the trigger more likely to be hypotension (odds ratio: 1.5, P = 0.0013). There were 263 MET calls to 217 individual medical patients within 24 h of admission, of which 84 (38.7%) were admitted with suspected infection, 69% of which fulfilled sepsis criteria. Of these, 36.2% received antimicrobial therapy within the recommended timeframe and 39.6% received antibiotics in line with hospital guidelines. Sepsis was initially missed in 11% of patients. Afferent limb failure occurred in 29% of patients with 40.5% experiencing a failure of the ward-based response to deterioration prior to MET call. Median hospital length of stay was increased in patients admitted with suspected infection (7 vs 5 days, P = 0.015) and in those with sepsis not receiving antimicrobial therapy within guideline timeframes (9 vs 4 days, P = 0.017). There is a significant opportunity to improve care for patients who trigger a MET within 24 h of admission. This study supports the implementation of a hospital sepsis management guideline.

The medical emergency team pharmacist: describing an overnight service

AbstractBackgroundClinical practice after hours and attendance at medical emergency team (MET) calls are two novel and emerging areas of pharmacy practice. During the COVID‐19 pandemic, our institution's pharmacy services expanded from 8 am–5 pm to 24 h daily, including MET call attendance.AimThis study aimed to describe pharmacist roles, including medications charted by the general medicine and intensive care unit pharmacists during the period of extended‐hours pharmacy practice and the characteristics of MET calls attended.MethodThis descriptive, cross‐sectional study included patients admitted to the Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia between 3 April 2020–28 February 2021, when a MET was called between 5 pm–8 am, a pharmacist attended, and medication changes occurred. Data collected included whether the MET call was medication related and a description of medication changes. Ethics approval was granted by the Alfred Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference no: 297/21).ResultsOne thousand six hundred and forty‐four MET calls (average 5.4 calls per night) were attended by pharmacists during extended hours. Medication changes were made in response to clinical deterioration at 627 (38%) calls. The most frequent change was the initiation of cardiovascular medications (n = 206). Partnered pharmacist medication charting, including commencing, ceasing, or changing medications, occurred at 39% of MET calls with therapy changes.ConclusionPharmacists can play a key role in managing deteriorating patients as part of a MET team. Medications may be implicated in clinical deterioration of patients and are frequently administered at MET calls. The expansion of pharmacy services provided the opportunity for pharmacists to contribute to MET calls across the 24‐h period.

Breaches of pre-medical emergency team call criteria in an Australian hospital

Objectives and outcomesTo evaluate the 24hrs before medical emergency team (MET) calls to examine: 1) the frequency, nature, and timing of pre-MET criteria breaches; 2) differences in characteristics and outcomes between patients who did and didn't experience pre-MET breaches. DesignRetrospective observational study November 2020–June 2021. SettingTertiary referral Australian hospital. ParticipantsAdults (≥18 years) experiencing MET calls. ResultsBreaches in pre-MET criteria occurred prior to 1886/2255 (83.6%) MET calls, and 1038/1281 (81.0%) of the first MET calls. Patients with pre-MET breaches were older (median [IQR] 72 [57–81] vs 66 [56–77] yrs), more likely to be admitted from home (87.8% vs 81.9%) and via the emergency department (73.0% vs 50.2%), but less likely to be for full resuscitation after (67.3% vs 76.5%) the MET. The three most common pre-MET breaches were low SpO2 (48.0%), high pulse rate (39.8%), and low systolic blood pressure (29.0%) which were present for a median (IQR) of 15.4 (7.5–20.8), 13.2 (4.3–21.0), and 12.6 (3.5–20.1) hrs before the MET call, respectively. Patients with pre-MET breaches were more likely to need intensive care admission within 24 h (15.6 vs 11.9%), have repeat MET calls (33.3 vs 24.7%), and die in hospital (15.8 vs 9.9%). ConclusionsFour-fifths of MET calls were preceded by pre-MET criteria breaches, which were present for many hours. Such patients were older, had more limits of treatment, and experienced worse outcomes. There is a need to improve goals of care documentation and pre-MET management of clinical deterioration.

Bundle of care to drive improvements in palliative and end-of-life care (PEOLC) in an acute tertiary hospital

ObjectivesThere is little evidence to suggest the best model of palliative and end-of-life care (PEOLC) in an acute care hospital. We introduced a bundle of care to drive improvements in...

Frequency of and associations with alterations of medical emergency team calling criteria in a teaching hospital emergency department

BackgroundMedical emergency team (METs), activated by vital sign–based calling criteria respond to deteriorating patients in the hospital setting. Calling criteria may be altered where clinicians feel this is appropriate. Altered calling criteria (ACC) has not previously been evaluated in the emergency department (ED) setting. ObjectivesThe objectives of this study were to (i) describe the frequency of ACC in a teaching hospital ED and the number and type of vital signs that were modified and (ii) associations between ACC in the ED and differences in the baseline patient characteristics and adverse outcomes including subsequent MET activations, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and death within 72 h of admission. MethodsRetrospective observational study of patients presenting to an academic, tertiary hospital ED in Melbourne, Australia between January 1st, 2019 and December 31st, 2019. The primary outcome was frequency and nature of ACC in the ED. Secondary outcomes included differences in baseline patient characteristics, frequency of MET activation, unplanned ICU admission, and mortality in the first 72 h of admission between those with and without ACC in the ED. ResultsAmongst 14 159 ED admissions, 725 (5.1%) had ACC, most frequently for increased heart or respiratory rate. ACC was associated with older age and increased comorbidity. Such patients had a higher adjusted risk of MET activation (odds ratio [OR]: 3.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.50–3.91, p = <0.001), unplanned ICU admission (OR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.17–3.14, p = 0.016), and death (OR: 3.87, 95% CI: 2.08–6.70, p = 0.020) within 72 h. ConclusionsACC occurs commonly in the ED, most frequently for elevated heart and respiratory rates and is associated with worse patient outcomes. In some cases, ACC requires consultant involvement, more frequent vital sign monitoring, expeditious inpatient team review, or ICU referral.

The ACCELERATE Plus (assessment and communication excellence for safe patient outcomes) Trial Protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial, cost-benefit analysis, and process evaluation

BackgroundNurses play an essential role in patient safety. Inadequate nursing physical assessment and communication in handover practices are associated with increased patient deterioration, falls and pressure injuries. Despite internationally implemented rapid response systems, falls and pressure injury reduction strategies, and recommendations to conduct clinical handovers at patients’ bedside, adverse events persist. This trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness, implementation, and cost–benefit of an externally facilitated, nurse-led intervention delivered at the ward level for core physical assessment, structured patient-centred bedside handover and improved multidisciplinary communication. We hypothesise the trial will reduce medical emergency team calls, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, falls and pressure injuries.MethodsA stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial will be conducted over 52 weeks. The intervention consists of a nursing core physical assessment, structured patient-centred bedside handover and improved multidisciplinary communication and will be implemented in 24 wards across eight hospitals. The intervention will use theoretically informed implementation strategies for changing clinician behaviour, consisting of: nursing executive site engagement; a train-the-trainer model for cascading facilitation; embedded site leads; nursing unit manager leadership training; nursing and medical ward-level clinical champions; ward nurses’ education workshops; intervention tailoring; and reminders. The primary outcome will be a composite measure of medical emergency team calls (rapid response calls and ‘Code Blue’ calls), unplanned intensive care unit admissions, in-hospital falls and hospital-acquired pressure injuries; these measures individually will also form secondary outcomes. Other secondary outcomes are: i) patient-reported experience measures of receiving safe and patient-centred care, ii) nurses’ perceptions of barriers to physical assessment, readiness to change, and staff engagement, and iii) nurses’ and medical officers’ perceptions of safety culture and interprofessional collaboration. Primary outcome data will be collected for the trial duration, and secondary outcome surveys will be collected prior to each step and at trial conclusion. A cost–benefit analysis and post-trial process evaluation will also be undertaken.DiscussionIf effective, this intervention has the potential to improve nursing care, reduce patient harm and improve patient outcomes. The evidence-based implementation strategy has been designed to be embedded within existing hospital workforces; if cost-effective, it will be readily translatable to other hospitals nationally.Trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12622000155796. Date registered: 31/01/2022.

Improving the management of medical emergency team calls due to suspected infections: A before–after study

ObjectiveTo introduce a management guideline for sepsis-related MET calls to increase lactate and blood culture acquisition, as well as prescription of appropriate antibiotics. DesignProspective before (Jun–Aug 2018) and after (Oct–Dec 2018) study was designed. SettingA public university linked hospital in Melbourne, Australia. ParticipantsAdult patients with MET calls related to sepsis/infection were included. Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was the proportion of MET calls during which both a blood culture and lactate level were ordered. Secondary outcomes included the frequency with which new antimicrobials were commenced by the MET, and the presence and class of administered antimicrobials. ResultsThere were 985 and 955 MET calls in the baseline and after periods, respectively. Patient features, MET triggers, limitations of treatment and disposition after the MET call were similar in both groups. Compliance with the acquisition of lactates (p = 0.101), respectively. There was a slight reduction in compliance with lactate acquisition in the after period (97% vs 99%; p = 0.06). In contrast, there was a significant increase in acquisition of blood cultures in the after period (69% vs 78%; p = 0.035). ConclusionsIntroducing a sepsis management guideline and enhanced linkage with an AMS program increased blood culture acquisition and decreased broad spectrum antimicrobial use but didn't change in-hospital mortality.

Pre–medical emergency team activations – Patient characteristics, outcomes and predictors of deterioration

BackgroundPre–medical emergency team (MET) calls are an increasingly common tier of Rapid Response Systems, but the epidemiology of patients who trigger a Pre-MET is not well understoof. ObjectivesThis study aims to examine the epidemiology and outcomes of patients who trigger a pre–MET activation and identify risk factors for further deterioration. MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of pre-MET activations in a university-affiliated metropolitan hospital in Australia, between 13 April 2021 and 4 October 2021. A multivariable regression model was used to identify variables associated with further deterioration, defined as a MET call or Code Blue within 24 h of pre-MET activation. ResultsFrom a total of 39 664 admissions, there were 7823 pre-MET activations (197.2 per 1000 admissions). Compared to inpatients that did not trigger a pre-MET, the patients were older (68.8 vs 53.8 years, p < 0.001), were more likely to be male (51.0 vs 47.6%, p < 0.001), had an emergency admission (70.1% vs 53.3%, p < 0.001), and were under a medical specialty (63.7 vs 54.9%, p < 0.001). They had a longer hospital length of stay (5.6 vs 0.4 d, p < 0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (3.4% vs 1.0%, p < 0.001). A pre-MET was more likely to progress to a MET call or Code Blue if it was activated for fever, cardiovascular, neurological, renal, or respiratory criteria (p < 0.001), if the patient was under a paediatric team (p = 0.018), or if there had been a MET call or Code Blue prior to the pre-MET activation (p < 0.001). ConclusionPre-MET activations affect almost 20% of hospital admissions and are associated with a higher risk of mortality. Certain characteristics may predict further deterioration to a MET call or Code Blue, suggesting the potential for early intervention via clinical decision support systems.

Postoperative complications and disposition for vascular surgery.

Among all surgical specialties, vascular surgery has the greatest proportion of patients with unplanned admissions to the intensive care unit postoperatively. Therefore, current clinical pathways for the postoperative management of vascular surgery patients may need to be revised. We aimed to compare the prevalence of postoperative deterioration in the high and standard risk cohorts of patients through several markers: medical emergency team activations and unplanned intensive care unit admissions. This was a single-centre, retrospective cohort study of all vascular surgical patients, emergency and elective, between 1 January and 31 December 2020 at Fiona Stanley Hospital, a tertiary hospital located in Perth, Western Australia. Patients (n = 680) were risk stratified using the surgical outcome risk tool into standard-risk (30-day mortality risk <5%; n = 475, 69.9%) and high-risk (30-day mortality risk ≥5%; n = 205, 30.1%). There were 43 unplanned intensive care unit admissions (6.3%) in total. Furthermore, surgical outcome risk tool 5% or greater risk patients were approximately eight times more likely to experience an unplanned intensive care unit admission compared with their surgical outcome risk tool less than 5% risk counterparts (relative risk 7.65, 95% confidence interval 3.84-15.21). There were 87 medical emergency team calls (12.8%) in total. In addition, surgical outcome risk tool 5% or greater risk patients were approximately five times more likely to experience a medical emergency team activation than their surgical outcome risk tool less than 5% risk counterparts (relative risk 5.15, 95% confidence interval 3.37-7.86). Our findings highlight the need for a revision of the inpatient journey for surgical outcome risk tool 5% or greater risk vascular patients, given their increased rates of unfavourable postoperative outcomes such as unplanned intensive care unit admission and medical emergency team activation. Ideally this can be addressed through appropriate postoperative triage, thus allowing this vulnerable population group early access to higher acuity care.

Piloting a Nurse-Led Critical Care Outreach Service to Pre-Empt Medical Emergency Team Calls and Facilitate Staff Learning

A nurse-led critical care outreach service (NLCCOS) can support staff education and decision making in the wards, managing at-risk patients with ward nurses to avoid further deterioration. We aimed to investigate the characteristics of patients identified as at-risk, the types of treatments they required to prevent deterioration, the education initiated by the NLCCOS, and the perceived experiences of ward nurses. This prospective observational pilot study using mixed methods took place in one medical and one surgical ward at a university hospital in Denmark. Participants were patients nominated as at-risk by head nurses in each ward, the ward nurses, and nurses from the NLCCOS. In total, 100 patients were reviewed, 51 medical and 49 surgical patients, over a six-month period. Most patients (70%) visited by the NLCCOS had a compromised respiratory status, and ward nurses received teaching and advice regarding interventions. Sixty-one surveys were collected from ward nurses on their learning experience. Over 90% (n = 55) of nurses believed they had learned from, and were more confident with, managing patients following the experience. The main educational areas were respiratory therapy, invasive procedures, medications, and benefits of mobilization. Further research needs to measure the impact of the intervention on patient outcomes and MET call frequency over time in larger samples.

Characteristics and outcomes of surgical patients admitted to an overnight intensive recovery unit: A retrospective observational study.

Postoperative 'enhanced care' models that sit between critical care and ward-based care may allow for more cost-effective and efficient utilisation of resources for high-risk surgical patients. In this retrospective observational study, we describe an overnight intensive recovery model in a tertiary hospital, termed 'recovery high dependency unit', and the characteristics, treatment, disposition at discharge and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted to this unit. We included all adult patients (≥18 years) admitted to the recovery high dependency unit for at least one hour between July 2017 and June 2020. Over this three-year period, 1257 patients were included in the study. The median length of stay in the recovery high dependency unit was 12.6 (interquartile range 9.1-15.9) hours and the median length of hospital stay was 8.3 (interquartile range 5.0-17.3) days. Hospital discharge data showed that 1027 (81.7%) patients were discharged home and that 37 (2.9%) patients died. Non-invasive ventilation was delivered to 59 (4.7%) patients and 290 (23.1%) required vasopressor support. A total of 164 patients (13.0%) were admitted to the intensive care unit following their recovery high dependency unit admission. Of the 1093 patients who were discharged to the ward, 70 patients (6.4%) had a medical emergency team call within 24 hours of discharge from the recovery high dependency unit. In this study of a recovery high dependency unit patient cohort, there was a relatively low need for intensive care unit admission postoperatively and a very low incidence of medical emergency team calls post-discharge to the ward. Other institutions may consider the introduction and evaluation of this model in the care of their higher risk surgical patients.

Partnered pharmacist medication charting (PPMC) in regional and rural general medical patients.

Errors in hospital medication charts are commonly encountered and have been associated with morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the impact of the Partnered Pharmacist Medication Charting (PPMC) model on medication errors in general medical patients admitted to rural and regional hospitals. A prospective cohort study, comparing before and after the introduction of PPMC was conducted in 13 rural and regional health services. This included a 1-month pre-intervention phase and 3-month intervention phase. In the intervention phase, PPMC was implemented as a new model of care in general medical units. Victoria, Australia. Patients admitted to General Medical Units. The proportion of medication charts with at least one error was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included inpatient length of stay (LOS), risk stratification of medication errors, Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls, transfers to ICU and hospital readmission. Of the 669 patients who received standard medical charting during the pre-intervention period, 446 (66.7%) had at least one medication error identified compared to 64 patients (9.5%) using PPMC model (p< 0.001). There were 1361 medication charting errors identified during pre-intervention and 80 in the post-intervention. The median (interquartile range) inpatient length of stay was 4.8 (2.7-10.8) in the pre-intervention and 3.7 days (2.0-7.0) among patients that received PPMC (p< 0.001). The PPMC model was successfully scaled across rural and regional Victoria as a medication safety strategy. The model was associated with significantly lower rates of medication errors, lower severity of errors and shorter inpatient length of stay.

Assessment and communication excellence for safe patient outcomes (ACCELERATE): A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial protocol

BackgroundNurses play a major role in patient safety. Poor nursing assessment and communication practices are associated with higher incidence of the adverse events of undetected deterioration, falls, and pressure injuries. Despite widespread adoption of patient safety systems, occurrence of these events continues. AimTo implement and evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of an organisational ward-level intervention to facilitate comprehensive systematic assessment and improved communication in clinical handover to reduce medical emergency team calls; unplanned Intensive Care Unit admissions; falls; and pressure injuries. DesignA stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial sequentially implemented over 12 months. MethodsEvidence-based implementation strategies will be employed to support implementation of an intervention focusing on comprehensive systematic patient assessment and improved nurse bedside clinical handover and multidisciplinary communication involving the patient. These are – intervention tailoring to individual wards through barrier and enabler identification; action plans; education; clinical champions; outreach visits; facilitation; clinician engagement; and reminders. Primary outcome measures will be a composite of Medical Emergency Team calls and unplanned intensive care unit admissions for deterioration. Secondary outcomes will be all categories of inpatient falls; stage 2–4 pressure injuries; nurse-reported perceptions of: teamwork; safety culture, and engagement; and patient-reported experience measures of receiving safe and patient-centred care. An a priori process evaluation will determine factors influencing intervention uptake and inform strategies for future upscale and spread. DiscussionThis feasibility trial will provide evidence regarding the use of systematic comprehensive patient assessment, combined with clinical handover re-design involving patients, to reduce clinical deterioration, falls and pressure injuries.

Clinical outcomes of patients triggering medical emergency team calls for sinus tachycardia.

Medical emergency team (MET) calls allow unstable patients to be identified earlier and enables clinicians to institute timely management to ameliorate physiological stress. Sinus tachycardia is a common cause for triggering MET calls. In this study, outcome measures relating to patients who have a MET call for sinus tachycardia were analysed. Two hundred and ninety-three consecutive patients who had MET calls as a result of sinus tachycardia were included in the study. Outcome measures assessed included inpatient mortality, duration of hospital stay, change in disposition of patient care, change in goals of care, and underlying aetiology. Comparison between medical and procedural patients was also performed. There were 154 patients in the medical group compared to 139 patients in the procedural group. Inpatient mortality was 13% and 6% respectively (p-value= 0.065). The duration of hospital stay was longer in the medical group (11 vs. 8 days, p-value= 0.295). Sepsis accounted for about 50% of MET call diagnoses in both groups. Around 20% of patients in both groups did not have a clear cause identified for the sinus tachycardia. About one-fifth of the patients in both groups were transferred to intensive care following the MET call (17% vs. 16%; p-value= 0.823). Sinus tachycardia triggering MET call is not a benign condition. It not infrequently requires escalation of care and is associated with significant inpatient mortality. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for sepsis as the underlying cause. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Recognizing and responding to clinical deterioration in adult patients in isolation precautions for infection control: a retrospective cohort study.

Patient isolation is widely used as a strategy for prevention and control of infection but may have unintended consequences for patients. Early recognition and response to acute deterioration is an essential component of safe, quality patient care and has not been explored for patients in isolation. The primary aims of this study were to (i) describe the timing, frequency and nature of clinical deterioration during hospital admission for patients with isolation precautions for infection control and (ii) compare the characteristics of patients who did and did not deteriorate during their initial period of isolation precautions for infection control. This retrospective cohort study was conducted across three sites of a large Australian health service. The study sample were adult patients (≥18 years) admitted into isolation precautions within 24 h of admission from 1 July 2019 to 31 December 2019. There were 634 patients who fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. One in eight patients experienced at least one episode of clinical deterioration during their time in isolation with most episodes of deterioration occurring within the first 2 days of admission. Timely Medical Emergency Team calls occurred in almost half the episodes of deterioration; however, the same proportion (47.2%) of deterioration episodes resulted in no Medical Emergency Team activation (afferent limb failure). In the 24 h preceding each episode of clinical deterioration (n = 180), 81.6% (n = 147) of episodes were preceded by vital signs fulfilling pre-Medical Emergency Team criteria. Patients who deteriorated during isolation for infection control were older (median age 74.0 vs 71.0 years, P = 0.042); more likely to live in a residential care facility (21.0% vs 7.2%, P = 0.006); had a longer initial period of isolation (4.0 vs 2.9 days, P = < 000.1) and hospital length-of-stay (median 4.9 vs 3.2 days, P = < 0.001) and were more likely to die in hospital (12.3% vs 4.3%, P < 0.001). Patients in isolation precautions experienced high Medical Emergency Team afferent limb failure and most fulfilled pre-Medical Emergency Team criteria in the 24 h preceding episodes of deterioration. Timely recognition and response to clinical deterioration continue to be essential in providing safe, quality patient care regardless of the hospital-care environment.

Does deep neuromuscular blockade provide improved outcomes in low pressure laparoscopic colorectal surgery? A single blinded randomized pilot study.

Low intra-abdominal pressure during laparoscopic colorectal surgery may improve outcomes and reduce hospital stay, in addition to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols. There is concern that low pressure reduces laparoscopic vision and may increase surgical complications. Deep neuromuscular blockade may abrogate any reduction in vision of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. However, antagonism of deep neuromuscular blockade at completion of surgery necessitates the use of sugammadex, which is prohibitively expensive, if there are no surgical benefits and warrants further study. A single institution, single blinded randomized controlled pilot study was performed comparing deep to moderate neuromuscular blockade in major laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Thirty-eight patients were randomized to deep or moderate neuromuscular blockade. There were no statistically significant differences between groups, when comparing key patient demographics, or surgeon satisfaction with view, which required increased pressure or further relaxation demands. The deep blockade group had increased QoR15 scores and a decrease in pain, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) measurements and operating times, although were non-significant. The moderate group had slightly higher incidents of Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls and more severe complications, although were non-significant. Low intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic colorectal surgery is feasible and allows adequate surgical visualization, regardless of the degree of neuromuscular blockade. Potential benefits of deep neuromuscular blockade may include improved pain and quality of recovery and a possible reduction of complications; however a larger cohort is required to confirm this. Future ERAS protocols may consider deep neuromuscular blockade with low intra-abdominal pressure to further benefit patients.

Features, risk factors, and outcomes of older internal medicine patients triggering a medical emergency team call.

Information about the epidemiology of older Internal Medicine patients receiving medical emergency team (MET) calls is limited. We assessed the prevalence, characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of this vulnerable group. Internal Medicine patients aged >75years who were admitted via the Emergency Department to a tertiary hospital between January 2015 to December 2018 and who activated a MET call were compared to patients without MET call activation during the same time period. Outcome measures included management post-MET call, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission rates, discharge disposition, length of hospital stays (LOS), and in-patient mortality. There were 10,803 Internal Medical admissions involving 10,423 patients; median age 85 (IQR 81-89) years. Of these, 995 (10%) patients received at least one MET call. MET call patients had greater physiological instability in the Emergency Department and higher median Charlson comorbidity index values (2, IQR 1-3 vs. 1, IQR 0-2; p<.0001) than non-MET call patients. Overall, 10% of MET call patients were admitted to ICU. MET patients had a longer median length of stay (9 [IQR 5-14] vs. 4days [IQR 2-7]; p<.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (29% vs. 7%; p<.001). However, mortality of MET call patients without treatment limitations was 48/357 (13%). One in ten Internal Medicine patients aged >75years and admitted via ED had a MET call. Physiological instability in ED and comorbidities were key risk factors. Mortality in MET patients approached 30%. These data can help predict at-risk patients for improving goals of care and pre-MET interventions.

Automated alert and activation of medical emergency team using early warning score

BackgroundTimely recognition of warning signs from deteriorating patients and proper treatment are important in improving patient safety. In comparison to the traditional medical emergency team (MET) activation triggered by phone calls, automated activation of MET may minimize activation delays. However, limited data are available on the effects of automated activation systems on the time from derangement to MET activation and on clinical outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of an automated alert and activation system for MET on clinical outcomes in unselected hospitalized patients.MethodsThis is an observational study using prospectively collected data from consecutive patients managed by the MET at a university-affiliated, tertiary hospital from March 2013 to December 2019. The automated alert system automatically calculates the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and subsequently activates MET when the MEWS score is 7 or higher, which was implemented since August 2016. The outcome measures of interest including hospital mortality in patients with MEWS of 7 or higher were compared between pre-implementation and post-implementation groups of the automated alert and activation system in the primary analysis. The association between the implementation of the system and hospital mortality was evaluated with logistic regression analysis.ResultsOf the 7678 patients who were managed by MET during the study period, 639 patients during the pre-implementation period and 957 patients during the post-implementation period were included in the primary analysis. MET calls due to abnormal physiological variables were more common during the pre-implementation period, while MET calls due to medical staff’s worries or concern about the patient’s condition were more common during the post-implementation period. The median time from deterioration to MET activation was significantly shortened in the post-implementation period compared to the pre-implementation period (34 min vs. 60 min, P < 0.001). In addition, unplanned ICU admission rates (41.2% vs. 71.8%, P < 0.001) was reduced during the post-implementation period. Hospital mortality was decreased after implementation of the automated alert system (27.2% vs. 38.5%, P < 0.001). The implementation of the automated alert and activation system was associated with decreased risk of death in the multivariable analysis (adjusted OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.56–0.90).ConclusionsAfter implementing an automated alert and activation system, the time from deterioration to MET activation was shortened and clinical outcomes were improved in hospitalized patients.

Features and perceptions of a critical care outreach physician role

Objective: To describe the tasks completed by the critical care outreach physician (CCOP) and staff perceptions of the CCOP role.Design: Prospective observational study and survey of intensive care unit (ICU) staff.Setting: University-affiliated teaching hospital in Australia.Participants: ICU consultants, registrars and nurses.Interventions: Implementing a dedicated ICU consultant to review deteriorating patients outside the ICU.Main outcome measures: Prospective collection of CCOP tasks and survey of ICU staff.Results: During 101 clinical shifts, the CCOP had 1524 encounters (mean, 15.1 [standard deviation, 6.1]; median, 14 [interquartile range, 10–19] per day). The three commonest interventions were emergency department visits, direct consultant communication, and coordinating ICU admissions. Involvement in Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls, expediting patient care, and goals of care discussions were also relatively common. Survey responses were obtained from 55/84 (66%) eligible participants. Most respondents thought the CCOP would improve the predefined processes of care and patient-centred outcomes. The areas of greatest perceived benefit included supporting the MET registrar and coordinating simultaneous emergencies outside the ICU. Areas where the role was perceived to be less beneficial included improving handover, identifying patients at clinical risk outside the ICU, and reducing repeat MET calls.Conclusions: The tasks of a CCOP involved high level communication, coordination of care, and supervision of ICU staff. The effect of this role on patient-centred outcomes requires further research.