Canadian Medical Education Research Articles

Postgraduate Training: eLogbook, Entrustable Professional Activities & Co.

The transformation of time-bound and procedure-oriented specialist medical postgraduate training towards a competency-based approach (competency-based medical education, CBME) has been demanded for several years. Many frameworks, like the CANMEDs (Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists) describe competencies that should be acquired by each physician. In Germany, the medical council has recently obligated a competency-based postgraduate training. Although the idea of CBME emphasizes the learning process at the working place, CBME has also been criticized to be too theoretical and detached from the clinical working practice. To close this gap, the concept of Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) has been introduced. An EPA describes concrete clinical tasks that are successively entrusted to the trainee. The decision to entrust a task is supported by the sum of workplace-based assessments.Sustainable implementation of competency-based training requires close collaboration among all involved individuals and institutions. Furthermore, continuous feedback and open dialogue are crucial for identifying challenges and areas for improvement. The success of CBME hinges on the collective effort of all stakeholders to create a framework to enhance specialty training and an overall advancement in the field. This cooperative approach is essential to successfully translate the theoretical foundations of competency-based teaching into clinical practice and ensure high-quality specialty training.

Evidence of Differential Attainment in Canadian Medical School Admissions: A Scoping Review.

In Canada, many groups (e.g., Black, Indigenous, rural backgrounds) have historically faced and continue to encounter systemic barriers in accessing the medical profession. These barriers often manifest in performance disparities, known as differential attainment, during medical school admissions. This scoping review summarizes the nature and extent of evidence on the association of differential attainment in medical school admissions selection tools and outcomes with applicant social identity in the Canadian context. The authors used Arksey and O'Malley's scoping review framework to summarize research studies published between 2000-2022 with empirical evidence of differential attainment in admissions selection tools and outcomes with respect to a range of applicant social identity categories. The authors recorded whether studies adopted a structuralist and/or intersectional perspective. Ultimately, 15 studies were included in the review. While the evidence on differential attainment associated with social identity in Canadian medical education was heterogeneous, numerous studies highlight differential attainment in the admissions process associated with applicant race and/or ethnicity (6 studies), age (5 studies), gender (4 studies), socioeconomic status (3 studies), geographic location (4 studies), and rural or urban background (5 studies). These attainment differences were reported at 3 phases of the admissions process (invitation to interview, offer of admission, and acceptance of offer), and were driven by several admissions selection tools, including grade point average, Medical College Admission Test score, and interview performance. The review highlights evidence that suggests systemic, structural inequities in admissions systems manifest as differential attainment in Canadian medical school admissions. Based on this evidence, those who identify as Black or Indigenous and those with low socioeconomic status or rural backgrounds were generally more adversely affected. Admission practices must be studied and improved so medical education systems can better avow equality and human dignity and achieve equity goals.

The Use of Silicone Simulators for Bile Duct Anastomosis Education in Medical Conferences for the Purpose of Improving the Canadian Medical Education Directives for Specialists (CanMEDS) Competencies.

This technical report explores the potential of including silicone bile duct simulators for the purpose of completing a bile duct anastomosis (BDA)in medical conferences. The purpose is to target the need for exposure to more surgical skills and to contribute to the Canadian Medical EducationDirectives for Specialists (CanMEDS) requirements, as per the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Data collection was completed at the 2023 Canadian Conference for the Advancement of Surgical Education (C-CASE) in Montreal, Canada. For several years, the quality improvement feedback received at the end of these conferences suggested a few areas of improvement, one of which was related to the concept of return on investment (ROI). The participants spend a considerable amount of funds to travel to the conferences but feel that the only measurable gains are at a research capacityand thus only relate to two CanMEDS competencies. By leveraging C-CASE, the aim is to enhance students' educational experience during events they already intend to attend. Initially, students participated in a five-part simulation workshop and engaged in a think-aloud protocol (TAO). From there, nine participants were recruited for a focus group to further understand the perceived educational valueand feedback on both the simulators and the conference structure.

Teaching suicide prevention: a Canadian medical education conundrum.

Teaching suicide prevention: a Canadian medical education conundrum.

Variegated racism: exploring experiences of anti-Black racism and their progression in medical education.

Addressing anti-Black racism in medical education in Canada has become increasingly urgent as more Black learners enter medical institutions and bring attention to the racist harms they face. We sought to gather evidence of experiences of racism among Black medical learners and to explore the contexts within which racism is experienced by learners. Drawing on critical race and structural violence theories, we conducted interviews with Black medical faculty, students, residents, and staff at the University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine between May and July 2022. We thematically analyzed interviews using instrumental case study methodology. Thematic analyses from 13 interviews revealed 5 central themes describing experiences of racism and the compounding nature of racist exposures as learners progressed in medicine. Medical learners experienced racism through uncomfortable encounters and microaggressions. Blatant acts of racism were instances where patients and superiors harmed students in various ways, including through use of the N-word by a superior in 1 instance. Learners also experienced curricular racism through the absence of the Black body in the curriculum and the undue pathologizing of Blackness. Medical hierarchies reinforced anti-Black racism by undermining accountability and protecting powerful perpetrators. Finally, Black women medical learners identified intersecting oppressions and misogynoir that compounded their experience of racism. We propose that experiences of racism may worsen as learners progress in medicine in part because of increases in the sources of and exposure to racism. Anti-Black racism in medical education in Canada is experienced subtly through microaggressions or blatantly from different sources including medical faculty. As Black learners progress in medicine, anti-Black racism may become worse because of the compounding effects of exposures to a wider range of sources of racist behaviour.

When medical students are autonomously motivated to mentor: a pilot study on confidence in clinical teaching and psychological well-being.

Near peer mentorship (NPM) programs can help support medical students' well-being. Most studies, however, have not accounted for students' underlying motives to mentor, nor focused on clinical skills development and teaching. These limitations represent opportunities to better understand what motivates medical student mentors, and how to support their autonomous motivation, clinical development, and well-being. Informed by self-determination theory (SDT), we collected data from a group of medical student mentors involved in a NPM program at the University of Saskatchewan called PULSE. We then used correlation and regression to assess the relationship between students' autonomous motivation towards mentoring, perceived competence in teaching the clinical material, and psychological well-being. In line with our hypotheses, autonomous motivation towards mentoring (identified motivation in particular) was associated with higher perceived competence in clinical teaching, which in turn was associated with greater psychological well-being. Why medical students choose to mentor in NPM programs appears to have important implications for their clinical confidence and overall well-being. Findings are discussed in terms of designing NPM programs that support student growth and wellness in Canadian medical education.

Development of a competency framework for advanced practice nurses: A co-design process.

The aim of the study was to develop a comprehensive competency framework for advanced practice nurses in Belgium. A co-design development process was conducted. This study consisted of two consecutive stages (November 2020-December 2021): (1) developing a competency framework for advanced practice nurses in Belgium by the research team, based on literature and (2) group discussions or interviews with and written feedback from key stakeholders. 11 group discussions and seven individual interviews were conducted with various stakeholder groups with a total of 117 participants. A comprehensive competency framework containing 31 key competencies and 120 enabling competencies was developed based on the Canadian Medical Education Directions for Specialists Competency Framework. These competencies were grouped into seven roles: clinical expert and therapist, organizer of quality care and leader in innovation, professional and clinical leader, collaborator, researcher, communicator and health promoter. The developed competency framework has resemblance to other international frameworks. This framework emphasized the independent role of the advanced practice nurse and provided guidance in a clear task division and delegation to other professionals. It can provide a solid foundation for delivering high-quality, patient-centred care by advanced practice nurses in the years to come. This competency framework can guide further development of advanced practice nursing education in Belgium and represents a starting point for future evaluation of its feasibility and usability in education and clinical practice. Advanced practice nurses and healthcare managers can also use the framework as an instrument for personal and professional development, performance appraisal, and further alignment of these function profiles in clinical practice. Finally, this framework can inform and guide policymakers towards legal recognition of advanced practice nursing in Belgium and inspire the development of advanced practice nursing profiles in countries where these profiles are still emerging. What problem did the study address? The absence of a detailed competency framework for advanced practice nurses complicates legal recognition, role clarification and implementation in practice in Belgium. A rigorously developed competency framework could clarify which competencies to integrate in future advanced practice nursing education, mentorship programs and practice. What were the main findings? The competency framework outlined seven roles for advanced practice nurses: clinical expert and therapist, organizer of quality care and leader in innovation, professional and clinical leader, collaborator, researcher, communicator, and health promoter. Differentiation from other expert nursing profiles and clinical autonomy of advanced practice nurses were pivotal. Where and on whom will the research have impact? The comprehensive competency framework for advanced practice nurses and the collaborative methodology used can inspire other countries where these profiles are still emerging. The competency framework can be used as an instrument for role clarification, performance appraisals, continuous professional development, and professional (e-)portfolios. The competency framework can guide policymakers when establishing Belgian's legal framework for advanced practice nurses. The authors have adhered to CONFERD-HP: recommendations for reporting COmpeteNcy FramEwoRk Development in health professions. No patient or public contribution in the design of the study. A patient advisory panel commented on the developed competency framework.

Psychiatrists’ Engagement in Research as a Pathway towards the Expansion of Distributed Medical Education (DME): A Regional Analysis across Two Provinces in Atlantic Canada

In the context of Canadian medical education, Distributed Medical Education (DME) plays a crucial role in addressing healthcare disparities, particularly in rural areas. This study focuses on the Department of Psychiatry at Dalhousie University, analyzing psychiatrists’ engagement and willingness to participate in research at DME sites in Nova Scotia (NS) and New Brunswick (NB). The cross-sectional study, encompassing data from an environmental scan, surveyed 60 psychiatrists involved in medical education across seven health zones. Results revealed significant associations between gender, type of graduates, and specialist training. A majority of psychiatrists (68.3%) do not currently engage in mental health or translational research, citing barriers such as a lack of protected time and financial incentives. Notably, participants expressed interest in future research areas, including health services/quality improvement and addiction research. Geriatric psychiatry, predominantly female-dominated, lacked current research activities. The study emphasizes the need to address barriers and promote motivators, both intrinsic and extrinsic, to enhance psychiatrists’ research engagement. This strategic approach is essential for fostering active participation in research, thereby contributing to the expansion of DME sites in Atlantic Canada and beyond.

The utility of the MD extension program in Canadian medical education.

The utility of the MD extension program in Canadian medical education.

C-CASE 2023: Promoting Excellence in Surgical Education01. Near-peer tutoring: an effective adjunct for virtual anatomy learning02. Surgical Exploration and Discovery: perspectives on student-led debriefs in undergraduate surgical education03. How are emotions of medical residents and faculty in general surgery affected by new assessment mandates implemented in medical education?04. Equity, diversity and inclusion in medical residency: a Web-based analysis of Canadian

C-CASE 2023: Promoting Excellence in Surgical Education01. Near-peer tutoring: an effective adjunct for virtual anatomy learning02. Surgical Exploration and Discovery: perspectives on student-led debriefs in undergraduate surgical education03. How are emotions of medical residents and faculty in general surgery affected by new assessment mandates implemented in medical education?04. Equity, diversity and inclusion in medical residency: a Web-based analysis of Canadian

Understanding the perspective of community co-educators on community-based service learning: a qualitative analysis.

Community-based service learning (CBSL) is a core component of the Canadian medical education system. However, the unique role of community partner organizations (CPOs) in supporting CBSL remains unclear. This qualitative study evaluates the perspective of CPOs as co-educators in the undergraduate medical curriculum. We conducted eight semi-structured, one-on-one interviews with CPOs at a medical school in Toronto, Ontario between 2020-2021. Interviews were conducted following a pre-determined interview guide and then recorded, de-identified, and transcribed. Three reviewers independently performed an inductive thematic analysis of codes followed by a group review of discrepancies. Five main findings were identified: 1) CPOs share a common interest in serving as co-educators; 2) considerable heterogeneity in the understanding of co-education exists; 3) there is an opportunity for increased partnerships between CPOs and faculty; 4) the role of co-educators is limited by curriculum structure; and 5) co-educators facilitate unique teachings of social determinants of health otherwise not available through traditional didactic teaching. There is an emerging, unique role for community co-educators in the undergraduate medical curriculum, supported by interest from CPOs. Its emphasis may contribute to future cohorts of medical students capable of understanding and addressing the needs of the populations they serve.

Clinical empathy as perceived by patients with chronic illness in Canada: a qualitative focus group study.

Although clinical empathy - the ability of a physician to understand a patient's illness experience, communicate this understanding and act collaboratively to create a treatment plan - provides substantial benefits to both physicians and patients, medical students typically experience a decline in empathy during training. The primary objective of this study was to generate a model of clinical empathy grounded in the perspectives of people with chronic illness living in Canada, to promote empathy-focused curricular development in Canadian medical education. We conducted a qualitative focus group study using a constructivist grounded theory approach. We recruited adults (age ≥ 18 yr) with chronic illness who had recently seen a physician in Canada from virtual support groups. Six semistructured virtual focus groups with 3-5 participants each were scheduled between June and September 2021. We coded the transcripts using the constant comparative method, allowing for the construction of an overarching theory. Twenty patients (17 women and 3 men) participated in the focus groups; 1 group had 2 participants because 1 participant failed to appear. The majority of participants (14 [70%]) had at least a college degree. The mean rating for overall satisfaction with the Canadian health care system was 5.4/10.0 (median 5.0). The emergent theory showed that the perceived presence of physician empathy engendered positive internal processing by patients, leading to increased health care efficacy and enhanced mental health outcomes. Negative patient processing in response to the perceived absence of empathy led to reduced quality of health care delivery (e.g., ineffective referrals and more appointments), increased use of health care resources, disruptions in patients' personal lives, and negative physical and mental health outcomes. Clinical empathy can have life-altering impacts on patients, and its absence may increase resource use. As empathy involves understanding patients' lived experiences, any valid intervention to improve clinical empathy must be informed by patient perspectives.

Decolonial, intersectional pedagogies in Canadian Nursing and Medical Education.

Our intention is to contribute to the development of Canadian Nursing and Medical Education (NursMed) and efforts to redress deepening, intersecting health and social inequities. This paper addresses the following two research questions: (1) What are the ways in which Decolonial, Intersectional Pedagogies can inform Canadian NursMed Education with a focus on critically examining settler-colonialism, health equity, and social justice? (2) What are the potential struggles and adaptations required to integrate Decolonial, Intersectional Pedagogies within Canadian NursMed Education in service of redressing intersecting health and social inequities? Briefly, Decolonial, Intersectional Pedagogies are philosophies of learning that encourage teachers and students to reflect on health through the lenses of settler-colonialism, health equity, and social justice. Drawing on critical ethnographic research methods, we conducted in-depth interviews with 25 faculty members and engaged in participant observation of classrooms in university-based Canadian NursMed Education. The research findings are organized into three major themes, beginning with common institutional features influencing pedagogical approaches. The next set of findings addresses the complex strategies participants apply to integrate Decolonial, Intersectional Pedagogies. Lastly, the findings illustrate the emotional and spiritual toll some faculty members face when attempting to deliver Decolonial, Intersectional Pedagogies. We conclude that through the application of Decolonial, Intersectional Pedagogies teachers and students can support movements towards health equity, social justice, and unlearning/undoing settler-colonialism. This study contributes new knowledge to stimulate dialog and action regarding the role of health professions education, specifically Nursing and Medicine as an upstream determinant of health in settler-colonial nations such as Canada, United States, Australia, and New Zealand.

Implementing evidence-based obesity management guidelines requires development of medical competencies: A commentary outlining future directions in obesity education in Canada

BackgroundThis commentary provides an overview of forthcoming activities by Obesity Canada (OC) to inform obesity competencies in medical education. Competencies in medical education refer to abilities of medical professionals to appropriately provide patients the care they need. A recognized Canadian framework for informing medical competencies is CanMEDs. Additionally, the Obesity Medicine Education Collaborative (OMEC) provides 32 obesity specific medical competencies to be integrated across medical education curriculum. OC released the first globally recognized Adult Obesity Clinical Practice Guideline (CPGs) in 2020 inclusive of 80 recommendations. Referring to the CanMEDs and OMEC competencies, OC is developing medical education competencies for caring for patients who have obesity in line with the recent CPGs that can be applied to health professions education programs around the world. MethodsActivities being completed by OC’s Education Action Team include a scoping review to summarize Canadian obesity medical education interventions or programs. Next, with expert consensus a competency set is being developed by utilizing the CanMEDs Framework, OMEC and the CPGs. Following this, OC will initially survey undergraduate medical programs across the country and determine to what degree they are meeting the competencies in content delivery. These findings will lead to a national report card outlining the current state of obesity medical education in Canada within undergraduate medical education. ResultsTo date, OC has completed the scoping review and the competency set. The Education Action Team is in the process of developing the survey tools to assess the current delivery of obesity medical education in Canada. ConclusionThe evidenced-based report card will support advocacy to refine and enhance future educational initiatives with the overall goal of improving patient care for individuals living with obesity. The process being applied in Canada may also be applicable and modified for other regions to assess and better obesity medical education.

Inter-institutional data-driven education research: consensus values, principles, and recommendations to guide the ethical sharing of administrative education data in the Canadian medical education research context.

Administrative data are generated when educating, licensing, and regulating future physicians but these data are rarely used beyond their pre-specified purposes. The capacity necessary for sensitive and responsive oversight that supports the sharing of administrative medical education data across institutions for research purposes needs to be developed. A pan-Canadian consensus-building project was undertaken to develop agreement on the goals, benefits, risks, values, and principles that should underpin inter-institutional data-driven medical education research in Canada. A survey of key literature, consultations with various stakeholders and five successive knowledge synthesis workshops informed this project. Propositions were developed, driving subsequent discussions until collective agreement was distilled. Consensus coalesced around six key principles: establishing clear purposes, rationale, and methodology for inter-institutional data-driven research a priori; informed consent from data generators in education systems is non-negotiable; multi-institutional data sharing requires special governance; data governance should be guided by data sovereignty; data use should be guided by an identified set of shared values; and best practices in research data-management should be applied. We recommend establishing a representative governance body, engaging trusted data facility, and adherence to extant data management policies when sharing administrative medical education data for research purposes in Canada.

In solidarity with anti-racism leaders in Canadian medical education.

In solidarity with anti-racism leaders in Canadian medical education.

Development of a Novel Web-Based Tool to Enhance Clinical Skills in Medical Education.

A significant component of Canadian medical education is the development of clinical skills. The medical educational curriculum assesses these skills through an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). This OSCE assesses skills imperative to good clinical practice, such as patient communication, clinical decision-making, and medical knowledge. Despite the widespread implementation of this examination across all academic settings, few preparatory resources exist that cater specifically to Canadian medical students. MonkeyJacket is a novel, open-access, web-based application, built with the goal of providing medical students with an accessible and representative tool for clinical skill development for the OSCE and clinical settings. This viewpoint paper presents the development of the MonkeyJacket application and its potential to assist medical students in preparation for clinical examinations and practical settings. Limited resources exist that are web-based; accessible in terms of cost; specific to the Medical Council of Canada (MCC); and, most importantly, scalable in nature. The goal of this research study was to thoroughly describe the potential utility of the application, particularly its capacity to provide practice and scalable formative feedback to medical students. MonkeyJacket was developed to provide Canadian medical students with the opportunity to practice their clinical examination skills and receive peer feedback by using a centralized platform. The OSCE cases included in the application were developed by using the MCC guidelines to ensure their applicability to a Canadian setting. There are currently 75 cases covering 5 specialties, including cardiology, respirology, gastroenterology, neurology, and psychiatry. The MonkeyJacket application is a web-based platform that allows medical students to practice clinical decision-making skills in real time with their peers through a synchronous platform. Through this application, students can practice patient interviewing, clinical reasoning, developing differential diagnoses, and formulating a management plan, and they can receive both qualitative feedback and quantitative feedback. Each clinical case is associated with an assessment checklist that is accessible to students after practice sessions are complete; the checklist promotes personal improvement through peer feedback. This tool provides students with relevant case stems, follow-up questions that probe for differential diagnoses and management plans, assessment checklists, and the ability to review the trend in their performance. The MonkeyJacket application provides medical students with a valuable tool that promotes clinical skill development for OSCEs and clinical settings. MonkeyJacket introduces a way for medical learners to receive feedback regarding patient interviewing and clinical reasoning skills that is both formative and scalable in nature, in addition to promoting interinstitutional learning. The widespread use of this application can increase the practice of and feedback on clinical skills among medical learners. This will not only benefit the learner; more importantly, it can provide downstream benefits for the most valuable stakeholder in medicine-the patient.

Grappling with key questions about assessment of the Health Advocate role.

Although the CanMEDS framework sets the standard for Canadian training, health advocacy competence does not appear to factor heavily into high stakes assessment decisions. Without forces motivating uptake, there is little movement by educational programs to integrate robust advocacy teaching and assessment practices. However, by adopting CanMEDS, the Canadian medical education community endorses that advocacy is required for competent medical practice. It's time to back up that endorsement with meaningful action. Our purpose was to aid this work by answering the key questions that continue to challenge training for this intrinsic physician role. We used a critical review methodology to both examine literature relevant to the complexities impeding robust advocacy assessment, and develop recommendations. Our review moved iteratively through five phases: focusing the question, searching the literature, appraising and selecting sources, and analyzing results. Improving advocacy training relies, in part, on the medical education community developing a shared vision of the Health Advocate (HA) role, designing, implementing, and integrating developmentally appropriate curricula, and considering ethical implications of assessing a role that may be risky to enact. Changes to assessment could be a key driver of curricular change for the HA role, provided implementation timelines and resources are sufficient to make necessary changes meaningful. To truly be meaningful, however, advocacy first needs to be perceived as valuable. Our recommendations are intended as a roadmap for transforming advocacy from a theoretical and aspirational value into one viewed as having both practical relevance and consequential implications.

The Reliability of the Resuscitation Assessment Tool (RAT) in Assessing Emergency Medicine Resident Competence in Pediatric Resuscitation Scenarios: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study.

Introduction Emergency medicine (EM) postgraduate medical education in Canada has transitioned from traditional time-based training to competency-based medical education (CBME). In order to promote residents through stages of training, simulated assessments are needed to evaluate residents in high-stakes but low-frequency medical emergencies. There remains a gap in the literature pertaining to the use of evaluative tools in simulation, such as the Resuscitation Assessment Tool (RAT) in the new CBME curriculum design. Methods We completed a pilot study of resident physicians in one Canadian EM training program to evaluate the effectiveness and reliability of a simulation-based RAT for pediatric resuscitation. We recorded 10 EM trainees completing simulated scenarios and had nine EM physicians use the RAT tool to evaluate their performances. Generalizability theory was used to evaluate the reliability of the RAT tool. Results The mean RAT score for the management of pediatric myocarditis, cardiac arrest, and septic shock (appendicitis) across raters was 3.70, 3.73, and 4.50, respectively. The overall generalizability coefficient for testing simulated pediatric performance competency was 0.77 for internal consistency and 0.75 for absolute agreement. The performance of senior participants was superior to that of junior participants in the management of pediatric myocarditis (p = 0.01) but not statistically significant in the management of pediatric septic shock (p=0.77) or cardiac arrest (p =0.61). Conclusion Overall, our findings suggest that with an appropriately chosen simulated scenario, the RAT tool can be used effectively for the simulation of high-stakes and low-frequency scenarios for practice to enhance the new CBME curriculum in emergency medicine training programs.

Teaching peer reviewing to medical students through authentic peer reviews: how to build the next generation of scholars.

The peer review process is a critical step in producing sound scientific literature, traditionally conducted by professionals well-established in their field. It is uncommon for students, even at the graduate level, to contribute. Faculty created a novel course in which 18 medical students (nine per year) delivered peer reviews to the Canadian Medical Education Journal (CMEJ). The positive feedback and competency gained is described in the students' Letter to the Editor. While this course was initially created to benefit students, it has also helped to address a known deficit in peer reviewers. L'évaluation par les pairs est une étape essentielle de la production d'une littérature scientifique de bonne qualité. Traditionnellement faite par des professionnels confirmés dans leur domaine de compétences, il est rare que les étudiants, même ceux des cycles supérieurs, participent aux comités de lecture. Un cours novateur a permis à 18 étudiants en médecine (9 par année) de réaliser des évaluations par les pairs pour la Revue canadienne de l'éducation médicale (CMEJ). Les commentaires positifs et les compétences acquises sont décrits dans une lettre des étudiants à l'éditeur. Bien qu'à l'origine ce cours ait été créé pour profiter aux étudiants, il a également contribué à combler un déficit notoire de pairs évaluateurs.