Medical Dictionary For Regulatory Activities Queries Research Articles

Psychiatric disorders associated with fluoroquinolones: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database.

Fluoroquinolones are broad-spectrum antibiotics with significant antimicrobial activity. Despite their therapeutic benefits, they are associated with a range of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), particularly those affecting the central nervous system (CNS). This study aimed to analyze the psychiatric ADRs linked to fluoroquinolones using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. A retrospective pharmacovigilance study was conducted using FAERS data from Q1 2004 to Q4 2023. The data processing phase involved the FDA-recommended deduplication method, and ADRs were classified according to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Disproportionality analysis was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), and statistical significance was assessed using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The study identified 84,777 reports associated with fluoroquinolones, with 359,480 Preferred Terms-annotated entries, 27,816 of these reports were psychiatric ADRs. Mood disorders were the most frequently reported, including anxiety, depression, and delirium, with some reports escalating to suicidal ideation and behaviors. The Standardized MedDRA Query classification system was used to categorize these ADRs into Depression, Suicide/self-injury, Psychosis and psychotic disorders, and Non-infectious encephalopathy/delirium. Ciprofloxacin was most frequently linked to depression and suicidal ideation, while moxifloxacin showed a robust correlation with delirium. The risk of psychiatric ADRs varied by age group, with affective disorders more prevalent in adults under 65 and psychosis and delirium in those over 65. Fluoroquinolones are associated with a range of psychiatric ADRs, with notable differences between the drugs in the class. The study highlights the need for caution in prescribing fluoroquinolones, particularly for patients with pre-existing mental health conditions or those in higher risk age groups. The findings also underscore the importance of considering age-specific preventive strategies when administering these antibiotics.

Evaluation of Antipsychotic-Induced Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome Using a Self-Organizing Map.

Introduction In neuropsychiatric pharmacotherapy, neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) is a potentially serious side effect of antipsychotics characterized primarily by fever, disorientation, extrapyramidal disorders, and autonomic nervous system imbalance, which can lead to death if left untreated. We visualized the NMS profile of antipsychotics using a self-organizing map (SOM). We combined it with decision tree analysis to discriminate between 31 antipsychotics in more detail than typical antipsychotic (TAP) and atypical antipsychotic (AAP) classifications. Method A total of 20 TAPs and 11 AAPs were analyzed. We analyzed NMS reports extracted from the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database based on standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) queries (Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQ) code: 20000044, including 68 preferred terms). The SOM was applied using the SOM package in R version 4.1.2 (RFoundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Results The Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database contained 887,704 reports published between April 2004 and March 2024. The numbers of cases of NMS (SMQ code: 20000044) reported for risperidone, aripiprazole, haloperidol, olanzapine, and quetiapine were 1691, 1294, 1132, 1056, and 986, respectively. After the antipsychotics were classified into six units using SOM, they were adapted for decision tree analysis. First, 31 antipsychotics branched off into groups with loss of consciousness, with one group (10 TAPs) consisting entirely of TAPs, and the other consisting of antipsychotics that were further separated into two groups with coma induced by TAPs and AAPs. Conclusion The results of this study provide a reference for healthcare providers when predicting the NMS characteristics induced by each drug in patients, thereby facilitating the effective treatment of schizophrenia.

Relationship Between Melatonin Receptor Agonists and Parkinson's Disease.

Parkinson's disease affects millions of people worldwide, and without significant progress in disease prevention and treatment, its incidence and prevalence could increase by more than 30% by 2030. Researchers have focused on targeting sleep and the circadian system as a novel treatment strategy for Parkinson's disease. This study investigated the association between melatonin receptor agonists and Parkinson's disease, using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS). The target drugs were melatonin receptor agonists including ramelteon, tasimelteon, and agomelatine. Parkinson's disease cases were defined according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) 25.0; Standardized MedDRA Query (SMQ) using both the "narrow" and "broad" preferred terms (PTs) associated with Parkinson's disease. The association between melatonin receptor agonists (ramelteon, tasimelteon, and agomelatine) and Parkinson's disease was evaluated by the reporting odds ratio. Upon analyzing the data from all patients registered in the FAERS, ramelteon (ROR: 0.66, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.51-0.84) and tasimelteon (ROR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.38-0.62) showed negative correlations with Parkinson's disease. Conversely, only agomelatine was positively correlated with Parkinson's disease (ROR: 2.63, 95% CI: 2.04-3.40). These results suggest that among the melatonin receptor agonists, ramelteon and tasimelteon are negatively correlated with Parkinson's disease. In contrast, agomelatine was shown to be positively correlated with Parkinson's disease. These results should be used in research to develop drugs for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, fully considering the limitations of the spontaneous reporting system.

Cross-Cancer Type Evaluation of Potential Interstitial Lung Disease Complications of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Using JADER.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a serious adverse event caused by the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, only few large-scale studies have explored the association among ICI use, underlying cancer type, and ILD complications. This study aimed to analyze the association between the primary cancer type and ICI-induced ILD in a cross-sectional manner using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab (anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies) and durvalumab, avelumab, and atezolizumab (anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies) were included as ICIs in this study. Adverse events were identified based on the preferred terms of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 27.0/J listed in the Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQ) "interstitial lung disease." The reporting odds ratio was calculated to detect the association between ICI use and ILD complications, and a signal was detected if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval exceeded 1. In the analysis of all cancer types, a signal was detected for all ICIs except avelumab. An association between ICI and ILD was detected for all cancer types with nivolumab. However, pembrolizumab exhibited a signal only in colorectal cancer. In contrast, anti-PD-L1 antibodies displayed signals in five cancer types, excluding head and neck cancer, which was not reported in JADER. Among these cancer types, atezolizumab exhibited a signal only in breast cancer. The results of this study will help guide the safe use of ICIs based on the underlying cancer type in terms of ILD complications.

Safety profiles of methylphenidate, amphetamine, and atomoxetine: analysis of spontaneous reports submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.

Background: Methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and Amphetamine are the three most commonly used medications approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, a comprehensive analysis of their safety profiles across various age groups and genders in real-world contexts has yet to be conducted. In this study, a pharmacovigilance analysis was performed using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to examine differences in adverse events between methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and Amphetamine. Methods: From January 2014 to September 2022, FAERS reports listing "Methylphenidate," "Dexmethylphenidate," "Atomoxetine," "Amphetamine," "Lisdexamfetamine," "Dextroamphetamine," and "Methamphetamine" as primary suspects were analyzed after removing duplicate reports. We used the standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) query generalized search for adverse events at the preferred term level based on case reports. After filtering duplicate reports, disproportionality analysis was used to detect safety signals according to the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). In order to delve into potential safety concerns, we undertook a two-step analysis of the data. Initially, the data was segmented based on age cohorts: 0-5years, 6-12years, 13-18years, and individuals aged ≥19years. Following this, after partitioning the data into males and females within the 0-18years age group, and similarly for those aged ≥19years, further analysis was conducted. Results: The pharmacovigilance analysis uncovered substantial safety signals in the standardized MedDRA queries. Methylphenidate was associated with dyskinesia (PRR = 21.15), myocardial infarction (PRR = 12.32), and hypertension (PRR = 8.95) in children aged 0-5, 6-12, and 13-18years, respectively, as well as neonatal exposures via breast milk (PRR = 14.10) in adults aged ≥19years. Atomoxetine was linked to hostility/aggression (PRR = 15.77), taste and smell disorders (PRR = 6.75), and hostility/aggression (PRR = 6.74) in children aged 0-5, 6-12, and 13-18years, respectively, as well as hostility/aggression (PRR = 14.00) in adults aged ≥19years. Amphetamine was associated with psychosis and psychotic disorders (PRR = 16.78), hostility/aggression (PRR = 4.39), and Other ischaemic heart disease (PRR = 10.77) in children aged 0-5years, 6-12years, and 13-18years, respectively, and hostility/aggression in adults aged ≥19years (PRR = 9.16). Significant and noteworthy adverse event signals were also identified at the preferred term level. Specifically, methylphenidate was associated with myocardial infarction, acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery dissection, electrocardiogram QT prolonged, growth retardation, self-destructive behavior, suicidal ideation, and completed suicide. Atomoxetine was linked to electrocardiogram QT prolonged, growth retardation, and tic. Amphetamine was recorded for coronary artery dissection, suicidal ideation, and completed suicide. It was observed that male patients, including both children and adults, showed a more significant and frequent occurrence of adverse events compared to females, particularly in terms of cardiac disorders. The intensity and quantity of adverse event signals were distinctly different between the two genders, with males having a higher number of signals. All detected safety signals were confirmed using signals obtained from the disproportionality analysis. Conclusion: This pharmacovigilance analysis demonstrated significant variations in the safety profiles of methylphenidate, atomoxetine, and Amphetamine across different age groups and between different genders. Following an in-depth analysis of the FAERS database, we discerned prominent safety signals. Notably, the strength of the signals associated with coronary artery dissection induced by methylphenidate and amphetamine, as well as those related to suicide, demand particular attention. Consequently, it remains imperative to persist in monitoring these medications, assessing the associated risks, and carrying out comparative studies particularly geared towards ADHD drugs.

Analysis of adverse drug events in patients with bipolar disorders using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.

The aim of the present study was to survey adverse drug events (ADEs) in patients with bipolar disorders and identify risk factors using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database, a spontaneous reporting system. Data on patients with bipolar disorders were extracted from the JADER database. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms (PT) and standardized MedDRA queries (SMQ) were used to define ADEs. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for ADEs. A total of 8653 reports of 1108 types of ADEs (PT) were registered in data collected on 3521 patients with bipolar disorders. Rash (PT) was the most frequently reported in 549 patients, followed by drug eruption (PT) in 387, fever (PT) in 364, toxicity to various agents (PT) in 291, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (PT) in 261. Among 24 ADEs (PT) that were reported in more than 50 patients, lamotrigine was associated with increased risks of 13 ADEs (PT), followed by carbamazepine with increased risks of 8 ADEs (PT). The majority of these ADEs belonged to hypersensitivity (SMQ) or hepatic disorder (SMQ). Lithium carbonate was associated with increased risks of rash (PT), drug interaction (PT), and tubulointerstitial diseases (SMQ). All antipsychotics increased the adjusted odds ratio for neuroleptic malignant syndrome (PT). The risk of hyperglycemia/new onset diabetes mellitus (SMQ) was increased by olanzapine, quetiapine fumarate, and risperidone. We are presenting the profiles of ADEs in patients with bipolar disorders using the JADER database, and propose risk factors for 19 ADEs (PT) and 4 ADEs (SMQ).

MedDRA Labeling Groupings to Improve Safety Communication in Product Labels

The granularity and structure of the International Council for Harmonisation’s (ICH) Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) are useful for precise coding of adverse events (AEs) for data analysis. In product labeling for healthcare practitioners, however, the granularity of MedDRA Preferred Terms (PTs) can obscure the communication of adverse reactions (ARs). Driven by a focus on patient safety, business needs, and regulatory guidance, many sponsors and regulators have begun to develop institution-specific approaches to clustering similar AR terms in medical product prescribing information on a product-by-product basis. However, there are no agreed upon conventions that describe which AR terms may be appropriate to group together. In order to improve safety communication to patients and healthcare providers, there is an urgent need for a harmonized international approach to the creation and use of groups of MedDRA PTs which we refer to as “MedDRA Labeling Groupings (MLGs)” in medical product prescribing information. Given its long-standing contributions towards the design of Standardised MedDRA Queries (SMQs), the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) convened an Expert Working Group (EWG) with involvement of multiple major stakeholders to produce a consensus document on principles and points to consider in the development of MLGs. The CIOMS MLG EWG identified variations in grouping of MedDRA PTs in product labels, and in the current document, proposes a strategy for improving the communication of drug safety labeling. It is envisaged that the use of these consensus recommendations would be voluntary and applied to product labels in a manner that is consistent with existing regulatory frameworks.

Empagliflozin and incidence of events consistent with acute kidney injury: Pooled safety analysis in more than 15 000 individuals.

Empagliflozin and incidence of events consistent with acute kidney injury: Pooled safety analysis in more than 15 000 individuals.

Perampanel and pregnancy.

ObjectiveThe objective was to summarize pregnancy and fetal/postnatal outcomes following maternal perampanel exposure using preclinical and clinical data, and to use physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling to improve understanding of perampanel pharmacokinetics (PK) during pregnancy.MethodsPreclinical developmental studies with perampanel were conducted in pregnant rats and rabbits. Clinical data were collated from the Eisai global perampanel safety database, comprising reports of perampanel exposure during pregnancy from routine clinical settings, interventional studies, and non‐interventional post‐marketing studies, searched for events coded to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) high‐level group terms of Pregnancy, Labor, Delivery, and Postpartum Conditions and/or the Standardized MedDRA Query terms of Congenital, Familiar, and Genetic Disorders. A PBPK model was used to predict clinical perampanel PK throughout pregnancy.ResultsPreclinical studies indicated that perampanel may be linked with post‐implantation loss and/or some specific physical development delays but not fertility and early embryonic development. As of August 31, 2018, 96 pregnancies in 90 women receiving perampanel had been reported. No concomitant medications were reported in 26 (28.9%) women taking perampanel. Overall, 43 pregnancies reached full term (all normal live births), 28 did not reach term (induced abortion, n = 18; spontaneous miscarriage, n = 6; incomplete spontaneous miscarriage, n = 2; premature delivery, n = 1; stillbirth [Fallot’s tetralogy], n = 1), 18 were lost to follow‐up, and seven were ongoing at data cut‐off. Adverse events were reported in five full‐term neonates (low Apgar score, n = 2; fatal neonatal aspiration, n = 1; cystic fibrosis and congenital deafness, n = 1; poor sucking reflex and shallow breathing, n = 1). PK simulations predicted perampanel exposure decreases throughout pregnancy and is up to four‐ and three‐fold lower towards the end of pregnancy compared with non‐pregnant women for total and unbound perampanel, respectively.SignificanceThese data provide preliminary information on perampanel use during pregnancy and should be interpreted with caution. Further outcome data are required to estimate the prevalence of adverse pregnancy outcomes with perampanel exposure.

Adverse event profiles of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: data mining of the public version of the FDA adverse event reporting system

BackgroundTo describe and analyze the patterns of adverse events associated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) (sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, vildagliptin, and alogliptin) from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and to highlight areas of safety concerns.MethodsAdverse events spontaneously submitted to the FAERS between 2004 Q1 to 2019 Q2 were included. The online tool OpenVigil 2.1 was used to query the database. The research relied on definitions of preferred terms (PTs) specified by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and the standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQ). The reporting odds ratio (ROR), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated for disproportionality analysis.ResultsOver 16 years, a total of 9706 adverse event reports were identified. Alogliptin was excluded from further analysis due to insufficient sample size. Compared with the non-insulin antidiabetic drugs, the four DPP-4is were all disproportionately associated with four SMQs: “gastrointestinal nonspecific inflammation and dysfunctional conditions,” “hypersensitivity,” “severe cutaneous adverse reactions,” and “noninfectious diarrhoea”. As for PT level analyses, DPP-4is are associated with higher reporting of the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas, malignancies, infection, musculoskeletal disorders, general disorders, hypersensitivity, and skin AEs.ConclusionsData mining of the FAERS is useful for examining DPP-4 inhibitors-associated adverse events. The findings of the present study are compatible with clinical experience, and it provides valuable information to decision-makers and healthcare providers in clinical practice.

PGI28 INFLUENCE OF PUBLISHED STUDIES ON SPONTANEOUS REPORTING OF ADVERSE KIDNEY EVENTS WITH PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS (PPIS)

Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used among the U.S. population and are generally considered safe. A few published studies reported kidney-related adverse events (AEs) with PPI use. This study examined the influence of these published studies on spontaneous reporting for PPIs with kidney AE events. The 2004-2018 U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data were analyzed. Individual PPI’s brand and generic names were used to identify AE reports. The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) and Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs) were used to identify Acute Renal Failure (ARF) and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). The year of first publications indicating risk of ARF (Klepser 2013) and CKD (Lazarus 2016) were used as the cut-off time points to analyze the relative reporting rates (disproportionality analyses using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with 95% confidence interval (CI)) of these AEs before and after of these publications, as well as the entire study period. Overall, the ROR for ARF with all PPIs was 1.89 (95%CI 1.88-1.91); however, before the first publication in 2013, the ROR showed a protective signal (ROR=0.94, 95%CI 0.93-0.96). However, after 2013 the PPIs had an ARF ROR of 2.96 (95% CI 2.94-2.98). Similarly, the overall CKD ROR between 2004-2018 was 1.78 (95%CI 1.77-1.79), but the signal did not exist before 2016 (ROR=1.01, 95%CI 1.00-1.02). Elevation of safety signals for kidney-related AE reports with PPIs were observed after the publications of key studies. These analyses provide a “text-book” example of how publication bias can influence reporting rates of AEs. Future data mining and interpretation of case reports should carefully consider this problem in risk assessment.

SAFETY OF NINTEDANIB IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSIS (IPF): LONG-TERM GLOBAL PHARMACOVIGILANCE DATA

SAFETY OF NINTEDANIB IN PATIENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC PULMONARY FIBROSIS (IPF): LONG-TERM GLOBAL PHARMACOVIGILANCE DATA

Adverse event profiles of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy analyzed using the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report databases.

Ifosfamide is extensively used to treat several malignant conditions. Administration of ifosfamide can cause encephalopathy and other neurotoxic effects. The aim of this study was to obtain novel information on the onset profiles of ifosfamide-induced encephalopathy (IIE) considering other associated clinical factors using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) databases. We analyzed the reports of encephalopathy between 2004 and 2018 from the FAERS and JADER databases. To define IIE, we used the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms and standardized queries. The reporting odds ratios (ROR) at 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to detect the signal for IIE and adjusted for covariates using a multivariate logistic regression technique. We evaluated the time-to-onset profile of IIE and used the association rule mining technique to discover undetected associations, such as potential risk factors. In the FAERS database, the ROR (CI) for encephalopathy (preferred term, PT) and encephalopathy (standardized MedDRA queries, SMQ) was 56.58 (51.69-61.93) and 1.57 (1.48-1.67), respectively. In the JADER database, the ROR (95% CI) for encephalopathy (PT) and encephalopathy (SMQ) was 13.54 (9.91-18.50) and 1.24 (1.01-1.53), respectively. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed a significant contribution in IIE signal in the ≥ 60year group (p = 0.00094; vs. < 60year group) and ≥ 2000mg/m2 dosage group (p = 0.00045; vs. < 2000mg/m2 dosage group). The association rules of {ifosfamide, aprepitant} → {encephalopathy (SMQ)} demonstrated high lift values. The average dose of ifosfamide in patients with encephalopathy (PT) and without encephalopathy (PT) was 2022.8 ± 592.8 (mean ± standard deviation) and 1568.5 ± 703.2mg/m2, respectively (p < 0.05). Encephalopathy within the first 7days of ifosfamide administration was 94.1% for encephalopathy (PT) and 87.7% for encephalopathy (SMQ), respectively. The present analysis demonstrated that the incidence of encephalopathy with ifosfamide should be closely monitored for a short onset (within 7days). The patients who are administered a high dose of ifosfamide or co-administrated aprepitant should be carefully monitored for the development of encephalopathy.

Adverse Event Profiles of Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibodies Alone or in Combination: Analysis of Spontaneous Reports Submitted to FAERS.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)-either as single agents or in combination have become the standard of care for an increasing number of indications. Understanding both the ICI-associated adverse events (AEs) and the possible rank-order of these drugs in terms of susceptibility is essential if we are to improve the curative effect and reduce toxicity. We detected signals of the AEs of ICIs by data mining using the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) AEs Reporting System (FAERS) database. The definition relied on the preferred terms (PTs) and the standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs) provided by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratios (ROR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Adverse effects of CTLA-4 and PD-1 mAbs were most commonly observed in the skin, gastrointestinal tract, endocrine systems, liver, and lung, and they included rash, diarrhea, colitis, and thyroid dysfunction. Thyroid dysfunction, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and pneumonitis were more closely associated with the use of anti-PD-1, whereas colitis, diarrhea, hypophysitis, and adrenal insufficiency were more closely associated with anti-CTLA-4; rash and hepatitis occurred similarly in both. Disproportionality signals for less common AEs in other organ systems, including the renal, neurological, cardiac, ocular, musculoskeletal, and hematologic systems, were also detected. Nivolumab and pembrolizumab have very similar safety profiles, but the signal strength of AEs increased when combined with ipilimumab. The results of this study are in agreement with clinical observations, suggesting the usefulness of pharmacovigilance in "real-world" safety monitoring.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of infective endocarditis for dental procedures is not associated with fatal adverse drug reactions in France.

BackgroundOne of the major reasons to stop antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) to prevent infective endocarditis (IE) in the United Kingdom but not in the rest of the world was that it would result in more deaths from fatal adverse drug reactions (ADRs) than the number of IE deaths. The main aim of this study was to quantify and describe the ADRs with amoxicillin or clindamycin for IE AP. The second aim was to infer a crude incidence of anaphylaxis associated with amoxicillin for IE AP.Material and MethodsThe Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) was used to group ADRs for IE AP using the broad Standardized MedDRA Queries “Anaphylactic reaction, Amoxicillin, Clindamycin, Clostridium Difficile infection” to the French Pharmacovigilance Database System. From this first-line collection, we selected all cases occurring for IE AP and ultimately, the cases for IE AP for a dental procedure. Then, each case was analyzed.ResultsOf 11639 first-line recorded ADRs, 100 were for IE AP but no fatal anaphylaxis to amoxicillin or clindamycin and no C. difficile infection associated with clindamycin were identified. Only 17 cases of anaphylaxis to amoxicillin related to dental procedures were highlighted. The estimation of the crude incidence rate of anaphylaxis associated with amoxicillin for IE AP for invasive dental procedure was 1/57 000 (95% CI 0.2-0.6).ConclusionsFatal or severe ADRs with amoxicillin or clindamycin is not a rational argument to stop IE AP before invasive dental procedures. Key words:Infective endocarditis, antibiotic prophylaxis, anaphylaxis, adverse drug reaction, amoxicillin, clindamycin, pharmacovigilance.

Risk Factors and Manageability of the Mainly Mild Mucocutaneous Bleeding Profile Observed in Attp Patients Treated with Caplacizumab during the Phase III Hercules Study

Risk Factors and Manageability of the Mainly Mild Mucocutaneous Bleeding Profile Observed in Attp Patients Treated with Caplacizumab during the Phase III Hercules Study

Perampanel with concomitant levetiracetam and topiramate: Post hoc analysis of adverse events related to hostility and aggression

In 4 Phase III registration trials (3 in patients with partial seizures, N=1480; 1 in patients with PGTCS, N=163), perampanel administered to patients already receiving 1–3 concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) demonstrated statistically superior efficacy compared to placebo in reducing seizure frequency. However, use of perampanel in these studies was associated with a risk of psychiatric and behavioral adverse reactions, including aggression, hostility, irritability, anger, and homicidal ideation and threats. The present study is a post hoc analysis of pooled data from these 4 trials to determine if concomitant treatment with levetiracetam and/or topiramate increased the risk of hostility- and aggression-related AEs. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were determined using a “Narrow & Broad” search based on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) standard MedDRA query (SMQ) for hostility- and aggression-related events. The rate of hostility- and aggression-related TEAEs was observed to be similar among perampanel-treated patients: a) receiving levetiracetam (N=340) compared to those not receiving levetiracetam (N=779); b) receiving topiramate (N=223) compared to those not receiving topiramate (N=896); and c) receiving both levetiracetam and topiramate (N=47) compared to those not receiving levetiracetam and topiramate (N=1072). Severe and serious TEAEs related to hostility and aggression were rare and occurred at a similar rate regardless of concomitant levetiracetam and/or topiramate therapy. Taken together, these results suggest that concomitant treatment with levetiracetam and/or topiramate has no appreciable effect on the occurrence of hostility- or aggression-related TEAEs in patients receiving perampanel.

Dementia-related adverse events in PARADIGM-HF and other trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

AimsInhibition of neprilysin, an enzyme degrading natriuretic and other vasoactive peptides, is beneficial in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), as shown in PARADIGM‐HF which compared the angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan with enalapril. As neprilysin is also one of many enzymes clearing amyloid‐β peptides from the brain, there is a theoretical concern about the long‐term effects of sacubitril/valsartan on cognition. Therefore, we have examined dementia‐related adverse effects (AEs) in PARADIGM‐HF and placed these findings in the context of other recently conducted HFrEF trials.Methods and resultsIn PARADIGM‐HF, patients with symptomatic HFrEF were randomized to sacubitril/valsartan 97/103 mg b.i.d. or enalapril 10 mg b.i.d. in a 1:1 ratio. We systematically searched AE reports, coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), using Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs) with ‘broad’ and ‘narrow’ preferred terms related to dementia. In PARADIGM‐HF, 8399 patients aged 18–96 years were randomized and followed for a median of 2.25 years (up to 4.3 years). The narrow SMQ search identified 27 dementia‐related AEs: 15 (0.36%) on enalapril and 12 (0.29%) on sacubitril/valsartan [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33–1.59]. The broad search identified 97 (2.30%) and 104 (2.48%) AEs (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.75–1.37), respectively. The rates of dementia‐related AEs in both treatment groups in PARADIGM‐HF were similar to those in three other recent trials in HFrEF.ConclusionWe found no evidence that sacubitril/valsartan, compared with enalapril, increased dementia‐related AEs, although longer follow‐up may be necessary to detect such a signal and more sensitive tools are needed to detect lesser degrees of cognitive impairment. Further studies to address this question are warranted.

Association between Selective Beta-adrenergic Drugs and Blood Pressure Elevation: Data Mining of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database.

Selective beta-adrenergic drugs are used clinically to treat various diseases. Because of imperfect receptor selectivity, beta-adrenergic drugs cause some adverse drug events by stimulating other adrenergic receptors. To examine the association between selective beta-adrenergic drugs and blood pressure elevation, we reviewed the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Reports (JADERs) submitted to the Japan Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency. We used the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Preferred Terms extracted from Standardized MedDRA queries for hypertension to identify events related to blood pressure elevation. Spontaneous adverse event reports from April 2004 through May 2015 in JADERs, a data mining algorithm, and the reporting odds ratio (ROR) were used for quantitative signal detection, and assessed by the case/non-case method. Safety signals are considered significant if the ROR estimates and lower bound of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceed 1. A total of 2021 reports were included in this study. Among the nine drugs examined, significant signals were found, based on the 95%CI for salbutamol (ROR: 9.94, 95%CI: 3.09-31.93) and mirabegron (ROR: 7.52, 95%CI: 4.89-11.55). The results of this study indicate that some selective beta-adrenergic drugs are associated with blood pressure elevation. Considering the frequency of their indications, attention should be paid to their use in elderly patients to avoid adverse events.

Safety of Onartuzumab in Patients with Solid Tumors: Experience to Date from the Onartuzumab Clinical Trial Program.

BackgroundOnartuzumab, a recombinant humanized monovalent monoclonal antibody directed against MET, the receptor for the hepatocyte growth factor, has been investigated for the treatment of solid tumors. This publication describes the safety profile of onartuzumab in patients with solid tumors using data from the global onartuzumab clinical development program.MethodsAdverse event (AE) and laboratory data from onartuzumab phase II/III studies were analyzed and coded into standardized terms according to industry standards. The severity of AEs was assessed using the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria, Version 4. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) AEs were grouped using the standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs) “gastrointestinal (GI) perforation”, “embolic and thrombotic events, venous (VTE)”, and “embolic and thrombotic events, arterial (ATE)”, and the Adverse Event Group Term (AEGT) “edema.” The safety evaluable populations (patients who received at least one dose of study treatment) for each study were included in this analysis.ResultsA total of 773 onartuzumab-treated patients from seven studies (phase II, n = 6; phase III, n = 1) were included. Edema and VTEs were reported in onartuzumab-treated patients in all seven studies. Edema events in onartuzumab arms were generally grade 1–2 in severity, observed more frequently than in control arms and at incidences ranging from 25.4−65.7% for all grades and from 1.2−14.1% for grade 3. Hypoalbuminemia was also more frequent in onartuzumab arms and observed at frequencies between 77.8% and 98.3%. The highest frequencies of all grade and grade ≥3 VTE events were 30.3% and 17.2%, respectively in onartuzumab arms. The cumulative incidence of all grade ATE events ranged from 0−5.6% (grade ≥3, 0−5.1%) in onartuzumab arms. The frequency of GI perforation was below 10% in all studies; the highest estimates were observed in studies with onartuzumab plus bevacizumab for all grades (0−6.2%) and grade ≥3 (0−6.2%).ConclusionsThe frequencies of VTE, ATE, GI perforation, hypoalbuminemia, and edema in clinical studies were higher in patients receiving onartuzumab than in control arms; these are considered to be expected events in patients receiving onartuzumab.