Medication Beliefs Research Articles

Unraveling Antiseizure Medication Adherence in Paediatric Epilepsy: Implications for Clinical Practice and Patient Care

ObjectiveNon adherence to antiseizure medications (ASM) is a common and modifiable risk factor for poor control of epilepsy and contributes to increased hospitalizations, bias in assessing the effectiveness of therapy and inaccurate clinical decision making.The aim of the study was to estimate proportion of nonadherence to antiseizure medications among children with epilepsy and to identify clinical and demographic factors that contribute to antiseizure medication non adherence. MethodsConsecutive subjects ≤ 18 years with epilepsy, on antiseizure medications for atleast three months, attending Pediatric Neurology OPD, Government Medical College Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India were included in the study. Self reported adherence to antiseizure medications was measured using Medication Adherence Report Scale questionnaire. Perceptions towards medications were assessed using Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire Clinicodemographic factors and medication beliefs were analysed to examine their association with non-adherence in the participating children. ResultsThe rate of non-adherence in children with epilepsy was 32%. 68% of the study population had high necessity beliefs and 60% showed low concern beliefs, which indicated overall positive perception towards medications. Univariate analysis showed that the following were significantly associated with ASM non adherence: ASM side effects (OR:3.01; 95% CI:1.52–5.92; p < 0.001) and ASM Concerns (OR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.77–0.92; p 0.0003) and Necessity-Concern Differential Score (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.10–1.29; p 0.0001). Other clinic-demographic variables did not exhibit a significant association with adherence. Multivariate analysis showed that both ASM side effects and ASM beliefs, represented by NCD score remained significant. ConclusionPerceptions towards medications have an important and potentially modifiable association with medication non adherence. Interventions to improve adherence should be tailored to each patient, including measures to address the specific beliefs of the patient and the family, along with practical barriers such as side effects of medications.

Development and validation of the Behavioral Determinants of Deprescribing Questionnaire (BDDQ)

Abstract Background Deprescribing is a strategy to optimize medication use. While health behaviour can successfully be predicted by health behavior theories, the literature on deprescribing relies almost exclusively on questionnaires that measure attitudes only, such as the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire and the Patients Attitudes Towards Deprescribing, resulting in poor predictive validity. The aim of this study was to develop a new tool to measure the psychological determinants of deprescribing among people aged over 60, based on concepts derived from health behaviour theories. Methods A draft self-report questionnaire was developed consisting of 64 questions measuring 11 dimensions representing determinants of deprescribing. As well as previous deprescribing experience, current deprescribing behaviour and willingness to deprescribe. Face validity was assessed by asking 10 health professionals and 13 of older people to complete the questionnaire and comment in a small group discussion, resulting in the removal of 18 items. Construct validity was assessed on a sample of 103 participants aged over 60, using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Internal consistency was assessed via Cronbach’s alpha. Results The EFA could confirm 11 dimensions explaining 70,5% of the total variance, but revealed poor loadings for several items and inadequate alphas (&amp;lt;.50) for two factors. Removal of items and these two dimensions resulted in 26 items measuring 9 dimensions, all showing acceptable internal consistencies (between .52 and .77): perceived risk; relatives’ involvement; deprescribing concerns; attitudes; medication beliefs; healthcare support; perceived difficulties; motivation to comply; communication accessibility. Conclusions This study produced a conceptually based and psychometrically validated questionnaire to assess behavioural determinants of deprescribing. It provides for a more comprehensive investigation of deprescribing intentions and behaviour of older adults. Key messages • A conceptually sound, psychometrically validated questionnaire (BDDQ) was developed. • BDDQ can be used for a more comprehensive study of de-prescribing in older people.

Pioneer of epidemiology and anesthesiology – John Snow (1813–1858)

IntroductionJohn Snow, a British physician of the 19th century, played a pivotal role in challenging prevailing medical beliefs during his time. His groundbreaking studies on the cholera epidemic led to the rejection of the miasma theory and the establishment of the link between contaminated water and the spread of the disease.AimThis study aims to explore the contributions of John Snow to the fields of anaesthesiology and epidemiology, focusing on his significant findings and methodologies.Material and methodsThis study utilizes a literature review approach to examine John Snow's contributions to anaesthesiology and epidemiology. Searches were conducted in databases using relevant keywords, focusing on peer-reviewed articles and authoritative sources. The data was qualitatively synthesized to extract key insights into Snow's methodologies and findings, aiming to provide a brief overview of his impact on medical science.Results and discussion:John Snow (1813-1858) is celebrated as a pioneer in epidemiology and anaesthesiology. He identified contaminated water as the source of the 1854 cholera outbreak in London, establishing the basis for modern epidemiology. Snow's innovative mapping of cholera cases was crucial in controlling the epidemic. He also advanced anaesthetic techniques, notably using chloroform on Queen Victoria during childbirth, improving the safety of anaesthesia. His work remains influential in both fields.Conclusions:John Snow's pioneering work significantly impacted the development of anaesthesiology and epidemiology. His insights into cholera transmission and anaesthetic agents, along with his seminal publication On Chloroform and Other Anaesthetic, continue to inspire advancements in medical science. Snow's legacy underscores the importance of evidence-based medicine and the pursuit of knowledge in addressing public health challenges.

Path analysis of illness perception, medication beliefs, family support on inhaler adherence in elderly COPD patients: Based on triadic reciprocal determinism

ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the pathways through which personal factors (demographic characteristics, illness perception, medication beliefs) and environmental factors (family support) influence adherence to inhaler therapy among Chinese elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on the triadic reciprocal determinism. MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from June 2022 to December 2023 using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI), the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (B-IPQ) and the Family Support Scale to investigate 305 elderly COPD patients (mean age 70.96 years, 213 males) from the Department of Respiratory Medicine of a comprehensive hospital in Anhui, China mainland. Path analysis was performed using AMOS 22.0. ResultsPath analysis showed that illness perception, necessity beliefs, concerns beliefs and family support all had direct effects on inhaler adherence, while age had an indirect effect on adherence. Additionally, necessity beliefs and concerns beliefs exhibited significant mediating effects between illness perception and inhaler adherence. Family support respectively mediated the relationships between necessity beliefs, concerns beliefs and inhaler adherence. ConclusionA multidimensional approach targeting cognitive, belief and family factors holds promise for substantially improving inhaler adherence among elderly COPD populations. Practice ImplicationsThis study provided new perspectives for improving inhaler adherence in COPD patients. Healthcare providers should emphasize improving patients' illness perception and medication beliefs, considering the important impact of family support on inhaler adherence.

Opioid Misuse by Adults with Chronic Pain: The Impact of Illness and Medication Beliefs.

Why do some adults with chronic pain misuse their prescription opioids when others do not? Based on the extended Common-Sense Model, the study evaluated whether adults' beliefs about their pain have an indirect effect on risk of opioid misuse through beliefs about opioids when controlling for depression. The sample included 297 adult participants in the U.S. recruited from Prolific, an online crowdsourcing website. Study measures included the Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R; protective and threat-related illness beliefs about chronic pain), the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire-Specific subscale (BMQ-Specific; concern and necessity medication beliefs about prescription opioids), and the Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM; risk of current opioid misuse). This cross-sectional parallel mediation analysis was conducted using MPlus. After controlling for depression, the indirect effect of protective illness beliefs on opioid misuse risk through concern medication beliefs (b = -0.01, 95% CI (-0. 038, -0.001), and the indirect effect of threat-related illness beliefs on opioid misuse risk through necessity medication beliefs (b = 0.02, 95% CI (0.004, 0.036) were significant. The full model explained 35% of the variance of opioid misuse risk. Adults with chronic pain with stronger protective beliefs about pain were less likely to have concerns about their opioids and were at lower risk for opioid misuse, while those with greater threat-related beliefs about pain were more likely to believe that their opioids were necessary and be at greater risk for opioid misuse. Results have implications for medical and mental health providers and future research.

Pharmacy Undergraduates’ Epistemic Cognition and Medication Beliefs as Predictors of Conceptual Learning and Academic Progress

The importance of studies showing the impact of students' epistemic beliefs on their conceptual learning and academic progress is increasing. This study investigated pharmacy students’ domain-specific epistemic cognition and topic-specific beliefs related to their level of conceptual prior knowledge, learning and study progress during the first academic year. Data were collected from 125 students using a pre-test/post-test design with a multiple-choice questionnaire, an open-ended case task and a measure of domain-specific epistemic cognition and topic-specific beliefs concerning medication. The results showed that students’ prior knowledge predicted their academic performance and more sophisticated epistemic cognition was related to better conceptual understanding, faster study progress, and fewer anti-medication beliefs. Anti-medication beliefs hindered participants’ success in the case task and were related to weaker study progress. Our study shows that epistemic cognition and topic-specific beliefs play a role in students’ performance, learning, and study progress

Supporting adherence to the cystic fibrosis regimen: Development and validation of The Daily Care Check-In (DCC)

BackgroundThe cystic fibrosis (CF) regimen is time-consuming and burdensome leading to barriers to self-management. This mixed-methods study developed the Daily Care Check-in (DCC) that is specific to the barriers faced by people with CF (PWCF) and evaluated its validity. MethodsQualitative methods were used to identify barriers to self-management and develop items, with “think aloud” cognitive interviews conducted to refine the items. A multisite, cross-sectional study was conducted to test the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and validity of the DCC scores, comparing them to objective medication adherence (composite medication possession ratio (cMPR)) and psychosocial measures (self-efficacy, medication beliefs, executive functioning, depressive and anxiety symptoms, treatment burden, and treatment complexity). ResultsThe DCC (18 items) includes two scales: Occurrence (score range 0–18) and Interference (score range 0–90). 405 participants completed the DCC, 344 (85 %) completed the survey, and 365 (90 %) had a cMPR calculated. On average, 6.8 barriers were reported (SD = 4.2 Occurrence Scale), and the Interference Scale had a mean score of 18.4 (SD = 14.0). Reliability was acceptable to good. cMPR was negatively correlated with the DCC (rho=-0.26, Occurrence and rho = -0.31, Interference, p-values<0.0001). A priori hypotheses between the DCC and the other measures were supported and demonstrated construct validity. ConclusionsThis study provides evidence supporting the validity of the DCC for assessing the presence and impact of barriers to CF self-management, including medication adherence. Formal screening of self-management barriers (e.g., using the DCC) should be considered to facilitate conversations with the care team and identify tailored interventions to support CF self-management.

Longitudinal changes in self-reported medication adherence and beliefs about post-stroke medicines in Sweden: a repeated cross-sectional study

ObjectivesTo explore changes in beliefs about medicines and self-reported medication non-adherence between 3 and 24 months after stroke and to investigate associations between beliefs about medicines and non-adherence at 24...

How doctors can lead the way in their communities: Co-creation, the Indian community and organ donation registration.

Transplant success rates can increase when organs and tissues are matched within ethnic communities, but how well are the processes around organ donation understood by discrete ethnic communities in Australia? We investigated this in relation to one ethnic group, the Australian-Indian community in Sydney. A culturally appropriate survey and dissemination strategy was co-created with Indian community members through an Advisory Panel. Items were informed by a thematic analysis of cultural beliefs shared through the advisory panel discussions and measured awareness and practices associated with organ donation and transplantation and beliefs about organ donation and registration. Donation information was provided at the end. Two hundred and thirty-eight participants completed the survey. Hinduism along with Tamil and Gujarati were the most frequently identified religious and cultural backgrounds. The processes around organ donation were not well known, and Australian Organ Donor Register registration rates were below the national average. Principal component analysis revealed positive, social, medical trust, concerns, and cardiac and brain death belief factors. Doctors played a key role in generating trust in the donation system, decisions about organ donation were embedded in family and community, and family discussion was related to increased registration. Registered participants reported higher scores on medical trust beliefs, which also predicted family discussion. The information needed to understand the process of organ donation and registration in Australia is not embedded in this community, highlighting the need forprogrammes to be tailored to each culturally diverse community rather than culturally diverse communites in general. Doctors and the advisory panels are pivotal in this process.

Asthma beliefs and overuse of short-acting beta-adrenergic receptor agonists among older adults

Objective Short-acting Beta-adrenergic Receptor Agonists (SABA) carry a risk of worse asthma outcomes when overused. Beliefs about asthma controller medications are associated with medication-taking behaviors in older adults, but the association of medication beliefs with SABA use has not been previously examined. We aimed to investigate the association of asthma and controller medication beliefs with SABA use among older patients with asthma. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of data on adults ≥ 60 years old with moderate to severe asthma in New York City, NY (n = 234). SABA overuse was defined as the average of ≥1 inhalation per day and controller medication adherence as ≥80% of expected inhalations, measured electronically. Illness and medication beliefs were measured using the Brief-Illness Perception Questionnaire and Beliefs about Medications Questionnaire, respectively. The associations of medication-taking behaviors with beliefs were examined in multivariable logistic regression models. Results The mean age was 67.6 ± 6.5 years, 84% were female, 26% were Black and 53% were Hispanic. 35% of participants overused SABA and 21% had adequate controller medication adherence. Overuse of SABA was not significantly associated with controller medication beliefs (Necessity: odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.97–1.12], p = 0.28, Concerns: OR 0.95 [95% CI 0.88, 1.03], p = 0.23) or asthma beliefs (OR 1.06 [95% CI 0.99, 1.15], p = 0.11). SABA overuse was also not significantly associated with controller medication adherence (OR 2.20 [95% CI 0.88, 5.51], p = 0.09). Conclusions SABA overuse was common among older adults with asthma and was not significantly associated with asthma controller medication or illness beliefs.

347.7: Illness perceptions, medication beliefs and immunosuppression adherence in young adult kidney transplant recipients: A single-centre cohort study and comparative analysis.

347.7: Illness perceptions, medication beliefs and immunosuppression adherence in young adult kidney transplant recipients: A single-centre cohort study and comparative analysis.

Personhood Begins at Birth: The Rational Foundation for Abortion Policyin a Secular State.

The struggle over legal abortion access in the United States is a religious controversy, not a scientific debate. Religious activists who believe that meaningful individual life (i.e., "personhood") begins at a specific "moment-of-conception" are attempting to pass laws that force this view upon all pregnant persons, irrespective of their medical circumstances, individual preferences, or personal religious beliefs. This paper argues that such actions promote a constitutionally prohibited "establishment of religion." Abortion policy in a secular state must be based upon scientifically accurate biology, not unprovable theological presuppositions. The scientific facts regarding human pregnancy do not support the position that personhood begins with fertilization-at which point a pregnancy does not yet even exist. Abortion policy should regard the embryo/fetus as part of the pregnant individual's body until delivery. We argue that individual "personhood" only begins when the latent potentialities of the fetal nervous system are actualized in the newborn after delivery. The paper argues that instantiating non-scientific beliefs concerning embryonic/fetal "personhood" into the law as the basis for abortion policy establishes a state-sponsored religion. The protection of religious liberty requires that abortion be decriminalized. Abortion should be treated like any other medical procedure and regulated similarly. To protect both religious freedom and sound medical practice, individual legal personhood should be recognized as beginning only at birth.

Clinical Predictors of Medication Compliance in Patients With Acute Herpetic Neuralgia

PurposePain is one of the most common and harmful symptoms experienced by individuals with acute herpetic neuralgia (AHN). In this population, studies to determine the causes that affect patients taking medications compliance are rare. This study aimed to construct a predictive model for medication compliance of patients with AHN and to verify its performance. Design and MethodsIn this prospective study of 398 patients with AHN who were discharged from a tertiary hospital with medications from July 2020 to October 2022, we used logistic regression analysis to explore the predictive factors of medication compliance of patients with AHN and to construct a nomogram. The area under the curve was used to evaluate the predictive effect of the model. ResultsA predictive model of drug compliance of patients with AHN was constructed based on the following four factors: disease duration, pain severity before treatment, medication beliefs, and comorbidity of chronic diseases. The area under the curve of the model was 0.766 (95% confidence interval [0.713, 0.819]), with a maximum Youden's index of 0.431, sensitivity of 0.776, and specificity of 0.655. A linear calibration curve was found with a slope close to 1. ConclusionsThe prediction model constructed in this study had good predictive performance and provided a reference for early clinical screening of independent factors that affected the medication compliance of patients with AHN.

Medication beliefs and depression in Black individuals with diabetes and mild cognitive impairment.

Medication beliefs and depression in Black individuals with diabetes and mild cognitive impairment.

Family Presence During Resuscitation: Perspectives of Saudi Emergency Medicine Providers.

Background Family presence during resuscitation (FPDR) has been a long-debated topic in medical circles in the last 40 years. Studies usually concentrate on the opinions and responses of the family members of the patients being resuscitated. Only a handful of studies have focussed on the medical practitioner's opinions and beliefs on the topic. Hence, this study aimed to investigate opinions and beliefs regarding FPDR among emergency medicine practitioners (EMPs) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methodology This was a self-filled, questionnaire-based study conducted among 450 EMPs across the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Proportions and subgroup analyses were conducted with respect to gender, experience, and seniority. EMPs were asked about the number of family members they would allow to attend the resuscitation of a patient under their care in different clinical scenarios. Results A total of 392 (87.1%) EMPs participated in this study. Overall, 64% (n = 250) of EMPs reported that they would not allow FPDR in cases that involved trauma, or if the patient being revived was female. This percentage dropped to about 33% (n = 129) when the patient being resuscitated was a child or in out-of-hospital arrest. The majority of EMPs believed that the decision to allow FPDR was the physician's decision (n = 251, 64.8%) and not the right of the family (n = 133, 34.7%). Moreover, emergency medicine board-certified physicians were more likely to allow FPDR in different cases with 19 (18.5%) in adult arrest cases, 18 (18%) in pediatric cases, and 16 (15.1%) in trauma cases, than non-board-certified practitioners (p = 0.001, 0.007, and 0.031, respectively). Female EMPs were more likely to refuse FPDR than their male counterparts (p < 0.001). Conclusions Approximately, 60-70% of EMPs allowed a member of the family to attend the resuscitation of their loved one. However, this percentage dropped in cases where the patient was a female, or the case was a trauma case instead of a medical case. Most Saudi EMPs believed that FPDR hurts the resuscitating team and might hinder the resuscitation efforts.

Developing Medication Reviews to Improve the Aruban Healthcare System: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

This study investigated whether and how medication reviews (MRs) conducted by pharmacists and general practitioners (GPs) with patient involvement can be performed on the island of Aruba (Dutch Caribbean). In this mixed-methods pilot study (both qualitative and quantitative), constructive and observational methodologies were combined. Healthcare providers' and patients' views on MRs and aspects of Aruban healthcare and culture relevant to MRs were examined. These insights were used to develop a protocol for conducting and implementing MRs in Aruba. Surveys were distributed and semi-structured interviews were held among Aruban community pharmacists and GPs, and a pilot program was created in which MRs were carried out with four Aruban patients and their GPs. According to the included healthcare providers, the main purpose of MRs is to optimize the patient experience and achieve concordance. Even though pharmacists and GPs consider their partnership equal, they have different views as to who should bear which responsibility in the MR process in matters regarding patient selection and follow-up. Common Aruban themes that were mentioned by the healthcare providers and deemed relevant for conducting MRs included behaviour/culture, healthcare, lifestyle, and therapy compliance. Anamnesis should be concise during the MR, and questions about medication storage, concerns, beliefs, and practical problems, as well as checks for limited health literacy, were considered important. In the pilot, at least three to, maximally, eight pharmacotherapy-related problems (PRPs) were detected per MR consultation, such as an incorrect dosage of acetylsalicylic acid, an inappropriate combination tablet for blood pressure regulation, and the absence of important laboratory values. All patients considered their consultation to be positive and of added value. In addition, it was observed that an MR can potentially generate cost savings. The information obtained from the healthcare providers and patients, together with the basic principles for MRs, as applied in the Netherlands, led to a definitive and promising MR format with practical recommendations for community pharmacists in Aruba: in comparison with the Dutch MR approach, GPs and pharmacists in Aruba could collaborate more on patient selection for MRs and their follow-up, because of their specific knowledge regarding the medications patients are taking chronically (pharmacists), and possible low levels of health literacy (GPs). Taking into account the Aruban culture, pharmacists could ask extra questions during MRs, referring to lifestyle (high prevalence of obesity), readability of medication labels (limited literacy), and herbal product use (Latin American culture). GPs and medical specialists sometimes experience miscommunication regarding the prescription of medication, which means that pharmacists must carefully take into account possible duplicate medications or interactions.

Adherence with oral nutritional supplements and influencing factors in postoperative patients with digestive tract tumors: a cross-sectional study.

This study aims to use structural equation modeling to explore the pathways and effect sizes of factors influencing the adherence of postoperative patients with digestive tract tumor to oral nutritional supplements, providing a theoretical basis for future nursing intervention measures. A total of 300 postoperative patients with digestive tract tumor within 30days after surgery were conveniently sampled. Surveys were conducted using a General Information Questionnaire, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, Digestive System Tumor Patient Nutrition Knowledge-Attitude-Behavior Questionnaire, Multidimensional Social Perception Scale, Beliefs about Medical Questionnaire, and General Self-Efficacy Scale. Structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the factors and pathways affecting adherence with oral nutritional supplements. The adherence score of postoperative patients with digestive tract tumor to oral nutritional supplements was 1.61 ± 1.38. The structural equation model had a good fit (χ2/df = 2.685, GFI = 0.930, CFI = 0.913, AGFI = 0.887, IFI = 0.915, and RMSEA = 0.075). Nutrition knowledge, social support, medication beliefs, and self-efficacy were found to be factors influencing adherence with oral nutritional supplements in postoperative patients with digestive tract tumor, with total effects of 0.539, 0.264, 0.215, and 0.180, respectively. Nutrition knowledge indirectly affected adherence through self-efficacy and medication beliefs, while social support indirectly affected adherence through self-efficacy. Adherence with oral nutritional supplements in postoperative patients with digestive tract tumor is at a low level. Improving social support, enhancing patients nutrition knowledge, increasing self-efficacy, and strengthening medication beliefs are effective ways to improve patient adherence.

Bad Habits that Stick: An Investigation into Adhesive Medical Tape Use Practices and Beliefs

Background: Medical tape is one of the most ubiquitous resources in the hospital. Although tape is advertised by manufacturers as a single patient-use item, half-used rolls are a common sight in hospitals. Tape is often manipulated by un-sanitized and ungloved hands and comes in close contact with patient skin. Medical tape has the potential to be a source of hospital-acquired infection as it has been documented to be colonized with pathogens ranging from MRSA to Rhizopus. Despite infection risk, currently the only clinical guidelines of tape use are outlined in the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services guidance for Hemodialysis patients issued in 2008 that requires “tape should be dedicated to a single patient and discarded after use” as hemodialysis patients are at higher risk of infection. However, there is a lack of standards in the practice of tape use across hospital systems. Methods: To understand the current practices and beliefs of tape use at our institution, we developed a standardized survey to query individuals from various roles (RN, Physician, Patient Care Technicians, respiratory therapists, phlebotomists) across all patient care areas at a 746-bed academic, tertiary care center. Results: 52 units were surveyed, including 225 employees. Qualitative analysis revealed a wide variety of uses for medical tape for patient care, with venipuncture, securing IVs, and wound dressings being the most common. Only 1.4% of individuals reported single use of tape rolls. 54% of individuals reported tape use behaviors that carry an elevated risk for inoculation of pathogens. 70% of individuals reported that tape was discarded after the patient was discharged from their respective area. These practices did not change across procedure-heavy areas such as the Emergency Department or the Operating Rooms, in fact only 22% of individuals surveyed reported single use of tape in these areas. Beliefs about tape use varied: 95% of individuals agreed that a roll of tape could be used multiple times on a single patient, and 52% of individuals agreed that a roll of tape could be used on multiple patients. Conclusions: Tape use practices varied across hospital units, indicating the need for standardized policies for tape use and storage. Beliefs about tape not being a single-use item were consistent across the hospital and suggest that education and culture change efforts are needed to decrease the risk for hospital-acquired infections from improper medical tape use.

Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Preferences and Health Beliefs Associated with Emergency Department Patients’ Intentions to Take a Cardiac Stress Test after Receiving Information about Testing

Medical Maximizing-Minimizing Preferences and Health Beliefs Associated with Emergency Department Patients’ Intentions to Take a Cardiac Stress Test after Receiving Information about Testing

Exploring the impact of a digital health tool on patients’ interaction with community pharmacists: A pilot randomized controlled study

BackgroundThe use of digital Patient- Reported Outcomes (PRO) tools has been shown to enhance the exchange of information and shared decision-making in medical encounters. However, their influence on patient-pharmacist interactions has not yet been explored. ObjectivesThis study aimed to examine the impact of RxTalk™, a digital PRO tool, in supporting the communication between patients and pharmacists compared to usual care. MethodsIntervention: RxTalk™ was developed to collect information about medication adherence and beliefs, using a tablet computer. Study designA pilot randomized controlled study was conducted at a community pharmacy in Wisconsin, USA. Sixty patients were randomized to either the intervention group who used RxTalk™ during medication pick-up or the control group who did not use the tool. Patients who used RxTalk™ received paper copies of their responses which were also shared with pharmacists. The consultation was audio-recorded for both groups and coded using the Active Patient Participation Coding scale. Follow-up phone interviews were conducted with both groups within one week of enrollment. ResultsPatient tapes were analyzed. In the unadjusted model, patients in the intervention group had a higher active participation rate (p = 0.004) and raised significantly more concerns during consultations (p < 0.001) compared to the control group. Pharmacists asked twice as many questions while counseling patients in the intervention group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). After controlling for patients' demographics and pharmacists’ questions, there was a statistical difference between the two patient groups in their odds of expressing at least one concern utterance. ConclusionThis pilot study suggests that collecting PRO from patients with chronic illnesses and providing results to pharmacists and patients can help patients express their health and medication concerns. RxTalk™ would be useful for pharmacists who wish to improve the recognition and management of medication-related problems.