Median Reduction In Seizure Frequency Research Articles

Early assessment of responsive neurostimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy in China: A multicenter, self-controlled study.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the first cohort of people in China treated with a responsive neurostimulation system (EpilcureTM, GenLight MedTech, Hangzhou, China) for focal drug-resistant epilepsy in this study. This multicenter, before-and-after self-controlled study was conducted across 8 centers from March 2022 to June 2023, involving patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who were undergoing responsive neurostimulation (RNS). The study was based on an ongoing multi-center, single-blind, randomized controlled study. Efficacy was assessed through metrics including median seizure count, seizure frequency reduction (SFR), and response rate. Multivariate linear regression was conducted to explore the relationships of basic clinical factors and intracranial electrophysiological characteristics with SFR. The postoperative quality of life, cognitive function, depression, and anxiety were evaluated as well. The follow-up period for the 19 participants was 10.7±3.4months. Seizure counts decreased significantly 6months after device activation, with median SFR of 48% at the 6th month (M6) and 58% at M12 (P<0.05). The average response rate after 13months of treatment was 42%, with 21% (n=4) of the participants achieving seizure freedom. Patients who have previously undergone resective surgery appear to achieve better therapeutic outcomes at M11, M12 and M13 (β<0, P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed in patients' scores of quality of life, cognition, depression and anxiety following stimulation when compared to baseline measurements. No serious adverse events related to the devices were observed. The preliminary findings suggest that EpilcureTM exhibits promising therapeutic potential in reducing the frequency of epileptic seizures. However, to further validate its efficacy, larger-scale randomized controlled trials are required. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No. ChiCTR2200055247).

Categorizing Monogenic Epilepsies by Genetic Mechanisms May Predict Efficacy of the Ketogenic Diet

BackgroundThe ketogenic diet (KD) is an effective treatment for epilepsy. In recent years, studies have shown favorable efficacy of KD in epilepsy from genetic disorders. In this study, we propose an approach to KD in monogenic epilepsy: we evaluate the utility of categorizing genetic variants based on rational associations with the known mechanisms of KD. MethodsPatients with monogenic epilepsy treated with KD were reviewed. The genetic etiologies were categorized into five groups: (1) conditions causing cellular energy impairment, (2) GABA-pathies, (3) mToR-pathies, (4) ion channelopathies, and (5) no known mechanisms associated with KD mechanisms. Treatment response was defined as a median reduction in seizure frequency of greater than 50%. ResultsOf 35 patients, 24 (69%) were responders at three months. Based on categories, Group 1 had the highest response rate with seven of seven (100%), followed by Group 2, six of seven (86%), and Group 3, two of three (67%). Patients in Groups 4 and 5 had poorer responses with three of seven (43%) and four of 11 (36%) response rates, respectively (P < 0.01). Median percentage of seizure reduction showed Group 1 with the highest reduction of 97.5%, Group 2 at 94%, and Groups 3, 4, and 5 at 62.5%, 30%, and 40%, respectively (P = 0.036). ConclusionOur findings show a favorable response to KD in patients with monogenic epilepsy (69% at three months) with the highest response in patients with conditions involving cellular energy impairment and GABA-pathies. The KD, therefore, should be considered early in patients with monogenic epilepsy, especially those involving genes associated with cellular energy impairment or GABA-pathies.

Vitamin D deficiency and effect of treatment on seizure frequency and quality of life parameters in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: A randomized clinical trial.

This study was undertaken to assess the effect of treatment of vitamin D deficiency in drug-resistant epilepsy. We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, including patients aged ≥15 years with drug-resistant focal or generalized epilepsy. Patients with 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) < 30 ng/mL were randomized to an experimental group (EG) receiving vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol, 100 000 IU, five doses in 3 months) or a control group (CG) receiving matched placebo. During the open-label study, EG patients received 100 000 IU/month for 6 months, whereas CG patients received five doses in 3 months then 1/month for 3 months. Monitoring included seizure frequency (SF), 25(OH)D, calcium, albumin, creatinine assays, and standardized scales for fatigue, anxiety-depression, and quality of life (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale [M-FIS], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Quality of Life in Epilepsy [QOLIE-31]) at 3, 6, and 12 months. The primary efficacy outcome was the percentage of SF reduction compared to the reference period and CG at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were SF and bilateral tonic-clonic seizure (BTCS) reduction, scale score changes, and correlations with 25(OH)D during the follow-up. Eighty-eight patients were enrolled in the study (56 females, aged 17-74 years), with median baseline SF per 3 months = 16.5 and ≥2 antiseizure medications in 88.6%. In 75 patients (85%), 25(OH)D was <30 ng/mL; 40 of them were randomly assigned to EG and 34 to CG. After the 3-month blinded period, SF reduction did not significantly differ between groups. However, during the open-label period, SF significantly decreased (30% median SF reduction, 33% responder rate at 12 months). BTCSs were reduced by 52%. M-FIS and QOLIE-31 scores were significantly improved at the whole group level. SF reduction correlated with 25(OH)D > 30 ng/mL for >6 months. Despite no proven effect after the 3-month blinded period, the open-label study suggests that long-term vitamin D3 supplementation with optimal 25(OH)D may reduce SF and BTCSs, with a positive effect on fatigue and quality of life. These findings need to be confirmed by further long-term studies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03475225 (03-22-2018).

Long-term evaluation of anterior thalamic deep brain stimulation for epilepsy in the European MORE registry.

Short-term outcomes of deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT-DBS) were reported for people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (PwE). Because long-term data are still scarce, the Medtronic Registry for Epilepsy (MORE) evaluated clinical routine application of ANT-DBS. In this multicenter registry, PwE with ANT-DBS were followed up for safety, efficacy, and battery longevity. Follow-up ended after 5 years or upon study closure. Clinical characteristics and stimulation settings were compared between PwE with no benefit, improvers, and responders, that is, PwE with average monthly seizure frequency reduction rates of ≥50%. Of 170 eligible PwE, 104, 62, and 49 completed the 3-, 4-, and 5-year follow-up, respectively. Most discontinuations (68%) were due to planned study closure as follow-up beyond 2 years was optional. The 5-year follow-up cohort had a median seizure frequency reduction from 16 per month at baseline to 7.9 per month at 5-year follow-up (p < .001), with most-pronounced effects on focal-to-bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (n = 15, 77% reduction, p = .008). At last follow-up (median 3.5 years), 41% (69/170) of PwE were responders. Unifocal epilepsy (p = .035) and a negative history of epilepsy surgery (p = .002) were associated with larger average monthly seizure frequency reductions. Stimulation settings did not differ between response groups. In 179 implanted PwE, DBS-related adverse events (AEs, n = 225) and serious AEs (n = 75) included deterioration in epilepsy or seizure frequency/severity/type (33; 14 serious), memory/cognitive impairment (29; 3 serious), and depression (13; 4 serious). Five deaths occurred (none were ANT-DBS related). Most AEs (76.3%) manifested within the first 2 years after implantation. Activa PC depletion (n = 37) occurred on average after 45 months. MORE provides further evidence for the long-term application of ANT-DBS in clinical routine practice. Although clinical benefits increased over time, side effects occurred mainly during the first 2 years. Identified outcome modifiers can help inform PwE selection and management.

Perampanel’s forgiveness factor in a variable medication adherence paradigm in a rat model of chronic epilepsy

BackgroundPoor medication adherence contributes to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with epilepsy and may be under-addressed in clinical practice. Ethical concerns make it impossible to study the impact of medication nonadherence in clinical trials, but our previous work emphasizes the importance of using preclinical approaches to address these questions. With over 30 clinically available antiseizure medicines (ASM’s), it remains an important question to understand the relationship between poor adherence and seizure incidence across mechanistically distinct ASM’s, including the broad-spectrum ASM, perampanel (PER).MethodsWe formulated PER into chow pellets to deliver to rats in a 100% fully adherent or 50% variable nonadherent paradigm via our novel automated medication-in-food delivery system. Chronic oral dosing was initiated in male rats with chronic epilepsy while monitoring 24/7 for videoEEG evidence of seizures during a 4-week placebo baseline and 4-week treatment phase. PER concentrations were monitored in plasma at 1-week intervals and correlated with degree of seizure control. The relationship between missed doses and extended patterns of nonadherence were correlated with breakthrough seizures.ResultsFully adherent rats demonstrated a median reduction in seizure frequency of 50%, whereas nonadherent rats had a median increase of 54%. Plasma concentrations of PER were stable over the 4-week treatment period in both fully adherent and nonadherent groups, with levels being twice as high in fully adherent animals. There was no correlation between a single missed dose or series of missed doses and the incidence of breakthrough seizures. However, those animals in the nonadherent group that received PER for every meal during a 24-h period had a reduced likelihood of seizure incidence.ConclusionsIf our preclinical data is supported in the clinic, PER’s favorable pharmacokinetic profile in humans, combined with a lowered risk of breakthrough seizures suggests that it may provide a certain forgiveness factor if a dose is missed within a 24-h window.

Does response to vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy differ in patients with and without Lennox-Gastaut syndrome?

Literature on outcomes of patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) receiving adjunctive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) lacks information on seizure types and the time course of therapeutic effects. We have therefore performed what is to our knowledge the largest and most in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of VNS in LGS patients paying special attention to the impact of VNS Therapy on individual seizure types. The VNS Therapy Outcomes Registry includes over 7000 patients. A propensity score matching method was employed to match patients with LGS to non-LGS patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Overall seizure frequencies were assessed prior to implantation and at 3-, 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month follow-ups to derive the main study outcomes: response rates and time to first response. A total of 564 LGS patients with sufficient data were identified in the registry and matched 2:1 to 1128 non-LGS patients. Responder rates at 24 months were 57.5% in the LGS group and 61.5% in the non-LGS group. Median seizure frequency reduction at 24 months was 64.3% versus 66.7% in the LGS versus non-LGS group, respectively. In both groups, VNS was most effective at reducing focal aware seizures, "other" seizures, generalized-onset non-motor seizures, and drop attacks with relative reduction rates for these seizure types at 24 months exceeding 90% in both groups. Time-to-first response did not differ between the groups; however, there was a significantly higher proportion of patients who regressed from bilateral tonic-clonic (BTC) seizure response in the LGS group versus the non-LGS group at 24 months: 22.4% versus 6.7%; p=.015. Although limited by its retrospective design, the study shows that the effectiveness of VNS is comparable in DRE patients with and without LGS; however, LGS patients may be more prone to fluctuating control of BTCs.

Comparison of the effectiveness of anterior thalamic stimulation in a European registry and a phase III study—English version

Besides the data of the phase III study (SANTE), the results of the MORE registry on the use of anterior thalamic deep brain stimulation (ANT-DBS) have recently become available. In which aspects do the phase III study and the MORE registry differ? A literature-based comparison was performed for the 2‑year outcomes of the prospective, randomized-controlled SANTE trial which included 110 patients and the prospective (nonrandomized, nonstandardized) MORE registry of 170 patients. The data analysis was focused on patient selection, surgical management, stimulation setting, therapeutic effects, and safety aspects. The median 2‑year seizure frequency reduction rate in the MORE registry remained clearly behind that of the SANTE trial (33% vs. 56%). Also in the subgroup of temporal lobe epilepsies, the seizure frequency reduction was not higher than 33%. Patients with cognitive impairment tended to have a poorer outcome compared to patients without cognitive impairment (26% vs. 36% median seizure frequency reduction rate). The MORE registry and the SANTE trial differed in several methodological aspects and patient selection: The SANTE trial included a higher percentage of patients with unifocal epilepsy (p = 0.007), temporal seizure onset (p = 0.0005), more frequent focal to bilateral tonic–clonic seizures (p = 0.02), and excluded patients with cognitive impairment (p < 0.0001). In the MORE registry, not only the trans- but also an extraventricular implantation approach was used and the achieved therapeutic effects were associated with the treating center’s level of expertise. The stimulation parameters and observed side-effects in the two studies were comparable. The registry data confirm the safe and effective use of ANT-DBS in drug-resistant epilepsy. They reflect the clinical routine use of the ANT-DBS therapy. While the results remained behind the outcomes of the phase III trial, they are within the effectiveness range of other neurostimulation therapies for epilepsy. The observed differences might be mainly due to differences in the cohort characteristics and differences in the implantation techniques.

The effect of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) on neuropsychiatric and psychosocial outcomes in drug-resistant epilepsy

ObjectiveThe impact of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) on neuropsychiatric and psychosocial outcomes has not been extensively evaluated outside of the original clinical trials and post-approval studies. The goal of this study was to ascertain the potential real-world effects of RNS on cognitive, psychiatric, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes in relation to seizure outcomes by examining 50 patients undergoing RNS implantation for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of all patients treated at our institution with RNS for DRE with at least 12 months of follow-up. In addition to baseline demographic and disease-related characteristics, we collected cognitive (Full-Scale Intelligence Quotient, Verbal Comprehension, and Perceptual Reasoning Index), psychiatric (Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventory Scores), and QOL (QOLIE-31) outcomes at 6 and 12 months after RNS implantation and correlated them with seizure outcomes. ResultsFifty patients (median age 39.5 years, 64% female) were treated with RNS for DRE in our institution from 2005 to 2020. Of the 37 of them who had well-documented pre and post-implantation seizure diaries, the 6-month median seizure frequency reduction was 88%, the response rate (50% or greater seizure frequency reduction) was 78%, and 32% of patients were free of disabling seizures in this timeframe. There was no statistically significant difference at a group level in any of the evaluated cognitive, psychiatric, and QOL outcomes at 6 and 12 months post-implantation compared to the pre-implantation baseline, irrespective of seizure outcomes, although a subset of patients experienced a decline in mood or cognitive variables. SignificanceResponsive neurostimulation does not appear to have a statistically significant negative or positive impact on neuropsychiatric and psychosocial status at the group level. We observed significant variability in outcome, with a minority of patients experiencing worse behavioral outcomes, which seemed related to RNS implantation. Careful outcome monitoring is required to identify the subset of patients experiencing a poor response and to make appropriate adjustments in care.

Centromedian thalamic deep brain stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: single-center experience.

Neuromodulation of the centromedian nucleus of the thalamus (CM) has unclear effectiveness in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. Prior reports suggest that it may be more effective in the generalized epilepsies such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). The objective of this study was to determine the outcome of CM deep brain stimulation (DBS) at the authors' institution. Retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent CM DBS at Emory University, which occurred between December 2018 and May 2021. CM DBS electrodes were implanted using three different surgical methods, including frame-based, robot-assisted, and direct MRI-guided. Seizure frequency, stimulation parameters, and adverse events were recorded from subsequent clinical follow-up visits. Fourteen patients underwent CM DBS: 9 had symptomatic generalized epilepsy (including 5 with LGS), 3 had primary or idiopathic generalized epilepsy, and 2 had bifrontal focal epilepsy. At last follow-up (mean [± SEM] 19 ± 5 months, range 4.1-33 months, ≥ 6 months in 11 patients), the median seizure frequency reduction was 91%. Twelve patients (86%) were considered responders (≥ 50% decrease in seizure frequency), including 10 of 12 with generalized epilepsy and both patients with bifrontal epilepsy. Surgical adverse events were rare and included 1 patient with hardware breakage, 1 with a postoperative aspiration event, and 1 with a nonclinically significant intracranial hemorrhage. CM DBS was an effective treatment for drug-resistant generalized and bifrontal epilepsies. Additional studies and analyses may investigate whether CM DBS is best suited for specific epilepsy types, and the relationship of lead location to outcome in different epilepsies.

Repeated long sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation reduces seizure frequency in patients with refractory focal epilepsy: An open-label extension study

ObjectiveAlthough clinical trials have demonstrated that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective for seizure reduction, its long-term efficacy is unknown. This study aimed to determine the long-term effects of repeated cathodal long tDCS sessions on seizure suppression in patients with refractory epilepsy. MethodsPatients were recruited to participate in an extended phase of a previous randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, three-arm, parallel, multicenter study on tDCS. The patients were divided into an active tDCS group (20 min of tDCS per day) and an intensified tDCS group (2 × 20 min of tDCS per day). Each tDCS session lasted 2 weeks and the patients underwent repeated sessions at intervals of 2 to 6 months. The cathode was placed over the epileptogenic focus with the current intensity set as 2 mA. Seizure frequency reduction from baseline was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for two related samples. A generalized estimating equation model was used to estimate group, time, and interaction effects. ResultsAmong the 19 patients who participated in the extended phase, 11 were in the active tDCS group and underwent 2–16 active tDCS sessions, and eight were in the intensified tDCS group and underwent 3–11 intensified tDCS sessions. Seizure reduction was significant from the first to the seventh follow-up, with a median seizure frequency reduction of 41.7%–83.3% (p < 0.05). Compared to the regular tDCS protocol, each intensified tDCS session substantially decreased seizure frequency by 0.3680 (p < 0.05). One patient experienced an increase of 8.5%–232.8% in the total number of seizures during three treatment sessions and follow-ups. ConclusionRepeated long cathodal tDCS sessions yielded significant and progressive long-term seizure reductions in patients with refractory focal epilepsy.

Adjunctive use of cenobamate for pediatric refractory focal-onset epilepsy: A single-center retrospective study

ObjectiveWe explored the efficacy and safety profile of cenobamate as an adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory focal-onset epilepsy in the pediatric population. MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-center study of cenobamate used as an adjunctive medication in pediatric patients with refractory focal-onset epilepsy . We measured seizure reduction, median reduction in seizure frequency, median dose, responder rate, and treatment-emergent adverse events. ResultsWe studied the efficacy and safety profile of cenobamate in 21 pediatric patients (mean age 15.9). Cenobamate was up titrated using the prescribed starter pack with final doses ranging from 100 mg to 400 mg daily. The mean and median dose of cenobamate was 209.8 mg (±98.87 mg) and 200 mg (175–275), respectively. For patients weighing less than 50 kg, mean and median dose was 4.0 mg/kg/day (3.20–4.63) and 4.32 mg/kg/day, respectively. Mean and median baseline seizure frequency per month in this cohort was 15.38 and 16, respectively, prior to the introduction of cenobamate. After the adjunctive use of cenobamate, mean and median seizure frequency per month reduced to 7.29 and 1, respectively; median reduction in seizure frequency was 93.7%. Seizure reduction of at least 50% (responder rate) was noted in 13 (62.5%) patients and a seizure reduction of at least 75% noted in 11 (52.4%) patients, similar to that seen in adults. Four patients (19%) achieved seizure freedom. Of the 21 pediatric patients, 9 (42.8%) patients had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) with the most commonly reported symptom being ataxia (5, 23.8%) and sedation (2, 9.5%). Three (14.3%) patients discontinued early due to these side effects. No children developed drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). ConclusionCenobamate demonstrates similar efficacy rates and safety profile within the pediatric population when compared to the published adult data, making it an effective, safe, and tolerable adjunctive medication for children with refractory focal-onset epilepsy, even at the maximum daily dose.

Concurrent brain-responsive and vagus nerve stimulation for treatment of drug-resistant focal epilepsy

ObjectiveClinical trials of a brain-responsive neurostimulator, RNS® System (RNS), excluded patients with a vagus nerve stimulator, VNS® System (VNS). The goal of this study was to evaluate seizure outcomes and safety of concurrent RNS and VNS stimulation in adults with drug-resistant focal-onset seizures. MethodsA retrospective multicenter chart review was performed on all patients with an active VNS and RNS who were treated for a minimum of 6 months with both systems concurrently. Frequency of disabling seizures at baseline before RNS, at 1 year after RNS placement, and at last follow-up were used to calculate the change in seizure frequency after treatment. Data on adverse events and complications related to each device were collected. ResultsSixty-four patients from 10 epilepsy centers met inclusion criteria. All but one patient received RNS after VNS. The median follow-up time after RNS implantation was 28 months. Analysis of the entire population of patients with active VNS and RNS systems revealed a median reduction in seizure frequency at 1 year post-RNS placement of 43% with a responder rate of 49%, and at last follow-up a 64% median reduction with a 67% responder rate. No negative interactions were reported from the concurrent use of VNS and RNS. Stimulation-related side-effects were reported more frequently in association with VNS (30%) than with RNS (2%). SignificanceOur findings suggest that concurrent treatment with VNS and RNS is safe and that the addition of RNS to VNS can further reduce seizure frequency.

Safety and efficacy of responsive neurostimulation in the pediatric population: Evidence from institutional review and patient-level meta-analysis

BackgroundResponsive neurostimulation (RNS) is a novel technology for drug-resistant epilepsy rising from bilateral hemispheres or eloquent cortex. Although recently approved for adults, its safety and efficacy for pediatric patients is under investigation. MethodsA comprehensive literature search (Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane) was conducted for studies on RNS for pediatric epilepsy (<18 y/o) and supplemented by our institutional series (4 cases). Reduction in seizure frequency at last follow-up compared to preoperative baseline comprised the primary endpoint. ResultsA total of 8 studies (49 patients) were analyzed. Median age at implant was 15 years (interquartile range [IQR] 12–17) and 63% were males. A lesional MRI was noted in 64% (14/22). Prior invasive EEG recording was performed in the majority of patients (90%) and the most common modality was stereoelectroencephalography (57%). The most common implant location (total of 94 RNS leads) was the frontal lobe (27%), followed by mesial temporal structures (23%) and thalamus (17%). At a median follow-up of 22 months, median seizure frequency reduction was 75% (IQR: 50–88%) and 80% were responders (>50% seizure reduction). Responses ranged from 50% for temporal lobe epilepsy to 81–93% for frontal, parietal, and multilobar epilepsy. Four infections were observed (8%) and there were no hematomas or postoperative neurological deficits. ConclusionCurrent evidence, albeit limited by potential publication bias, supports the promising safety and efficacy profile of RNS for medically refractory pediatric epilepsy. Randomized controlled trial data are needed to further establish the role of this intervention in preoperative discussions with patients and their families.

The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain-responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults.

ObjectivesThe gold standard for the management of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate whether RNS outcomes and safety varied based on age.MethodsWe performed a single‐center retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who were treated with RNS between May 2008 and February 2020. We included patients who had been implanted with RNS for >6 months (N = 55), dividing them into older (N = 11) and younger adults (N = 44) depending on implantation age (≥50 and <50 years, respectively).ResultsMean age at implantation in older adults was 54.9 ± 3.5 years. Seizure onset age, epilepsy duration, and comorbidities were significantly higher in older adults ( P < .01). Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and median seizure frequency reduction (76% in older vs 50% in younger adults) were statistically comparable between the two cohorts. Posttreatment, antiseizure medication burden was significantly decreased in older compared with younger adults (P = .048). Postoperative and delayed adverse events among older adults were mild. Compared with three younger adults, none of the older adults required device explantation due to surgical site infection.ConclusionOur study suggests that older adults treated with the RNS System achieve seizure outcomes comparable to younger adults with the additional benefit of a significant postimplantation medication reduction. With efficacy and safety similar to younger adults, brain‐responsive neurostimulation was well‐tolerated in older adults.

Pilot Safety and Feasibility Study of Non-invasive Limb Proprioceptive Cerebellar Stimulation for Epilepsy.

Cerebellar stimulation reduces seizures in animals and in humans with drug-resistant epilepsy. In a pilot safety and feasibility study, we applied continuous cutaneous vibratory stimulation (limb proprioceptive cerebellar stimulation) to foot limb proprioceptive receptors to activate cerebellar, pontine, and thalamic structures in drug-resistant epilepsy patients for 8-h nocturnally up to 6-months after a 4-week pre-treatment control baseline. Seizure frequency was evaluated during the baseline control period, and at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after the control recordings. Five-subjects completed at least the first 6-week treatment. At 12-weeks, the median reduction in seizure frequency was −27.8% (mean reduction = −22.3%). Two subjects continued for 24 weeks, with a decline of −44.1 and −45.4%. This pilot study provides support for further clinical studies into the safety and efficacy of limb proprioceptive cerebellar stimulation for epilepsy.

A phase 1b/2a study of soticlestat as adjunctive therapy in participants with developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathies

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of soticlestat, a first-in-class cholesterol 24-hydroxylase inhibitor, in adults with developmental and/or epileptic encephalopathies (DEE). MethodsThe study comprised a 30-day, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase (Part A), followed by a 55-day open-label phase (Part B) (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03166215) . In Part A, patients with DEE and at least one bilateral motor seizure during the 4-week prospective baseline period were randomized 4:1 to receive soticlestat or placebo, in addition to their usual antiseizure medication. In Part B, all patients received open-label soticlestat. Soticlestat doses were titrated according to tolerability to a maximum of 300 mg twice daily (BID). Safety evaluations included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Plasma soticlestat concentrations were measured at various times for determination of multiple-dose pharmacokinetics and 24S-hydroxycholesterol (24HC). Efficacy was assessed by evaluation of changes in seizure frequency from baseline. ResultsEighteen patients (median age, 28.5 years) were enrolled and randomized, and 14 (78 %) completed the study. In Part A, TEAEs occurred in 71.4 % of soticlestat-treated patients and 100 % of placebo-treated patients. In Part B, the overall incidence of TEAEs was 68.8 %. In Part A, TEAEs that occurred in more than one patient in the soticlestat group were dysarthria (n = 3, 21.4 %), lethargy (n = 2, 14.3 %), upper respiratory tract infection (n = 2, 14.3 %), fatigue (n = 2, 14.3 %), and headache (n = 2, 14.3 %). Four patients discontinued treatment because of TEAEs, of whom two reported drug-related seizure clusters as serious TEAEs. There were no deaths. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed dose-dependent increases in systemic exposure and peak plasma soticlestat concentrations. At the end of Part B, the overall mean percent change from baseline in plasma 24HC was −80.97 %. Changes from baseline in median seizure frequency were +16.71 % and +22.16 % in the soticlestat and placebo groups, respectively, in Part A, and −36.38 % in all participants in Part B. ConclusionSoticlestat was well tolerated at doses of up to 300 mg BID and was associated with a reduction in median seizure frequency over the study duration. Further studies are warranted to assess the possible efficacy of soticlestat as adjunctive therapy in patients with DEEs such as Dravet syndrome and Lennox–Gastaut syndrome.

Centromedian thalamic nucleus with or without anterior thalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for epilepsy in children and adults: A retrospective case series

The centromedian (CM) and anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) are deep brain stimulation (DBS) targets for management of generalized, and focal drug resistant epilepsy (DRE), respectively. We report on a single center retrospective case series of 16 children and adults with DRE who underwent CM with simultaneous ANT (69 %) or CM without simultaneous ANT DBS (31 %). Seizure frequency, epilepsy severity, life satisfaction, and quality of sleep before and after DBS were compared. Baseline median seizure frequency was 323 seizures per month (IQR, 71–563 sz/mo). Median follow up time was 80 months (IQR 37–97 mo). Median seizure frequency reduction was 58 % (IQR 13–87 %, p = 0.002). Ten patients (63 %) reported ≥50 % seizure frequency reduction. Median seizure frequency reduction and responder rate were not significantly different for CM + ANT versus CM only. Seizure severity and life satisfaction were significantly improved. Three patients (19 %) developed device-related side effects, 2 of them (12.5 %) required surgical intervention. In a heterogenous population of children and adults with generalized, multifocal, posterior onset, and poorly localized DRE, CM with or without ANT DBS is feasible, relatively safe and is associated with reduced seizure frequency and severity, as well as improved life satisfaction.

Fenfluramine HCl (Fintepla® ) provides long-term clinically meaningful reduction in seizure frequency: Analysis of an ongoing open-label extension study.

ObjectiveFenfluramine has been shown to provide clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in convulsive seizure frequency in children and adolescents (aged 2‐18 years) with Dravet syndrome in two randomized, placebo‐controlled clinical trials. The objective of this analysis was to assess longer‐term safety and efficacy of fenfluramine in patients who completed one of the double‐blind studies and entered an open‐label extension (OLE) study.MethodsPatients enrolling in the OLE study initiated fenfluramine at 0.2 mg/kg/d regardless of their treatment assignment in the double‐blind study. After 4 weeks, the fenfluramine dose could be titrated based on efficacy and tolerability to maximum of 0.7 mg/kg/d (absolute maximum 27 mg/d) or maximum of 0.4 mg/kg/d (absolute maximum 17 mg/d) in patients receiving concomitant stiripentol. The number and type of seizures were recorded daily in an electronic diary, and safety, including echocardiography, was assessed at Months 1, 2, and 3, and at 3‐month intervals thereafter.ResultsA total of 232 patients were enrolled as of March 13, 2018. During this analysis period, patients were treated for a median 256 days (range = 46‐634 days). Over the entire OLE analysis period, the median decrease in convulsive seizure frequency compared to baseline in the double‐blind studies was −66.8% (range = −100% to 234.9%; P < .001). The median reduction in seizure frequency was similar in patients <6 (−75.7%) and ≥6 years old (−64.7%). The most commonly reported adverse events included pyrexia (21.6%), nasopharyngitis (19.4%), and decreased appetite (−15.9%). No valvular heart disease (VHD) or pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was observed.SignificanceStudy results demonstrate that fenfluramine provides clinically meaningful (≥50%) seizure frequency reduction over an extended period in patients with Dravet syndrome. No patient developed VHD or PAH, and fenfluramine was generally well tolerated.

Padsevonil randomized Phase IIa trial in treatment-resistant focal epilepsy: a translational approach.

Therapeutic options for patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy represent an important unmet need. Addressing this unmet need was the main factor driving the drug discovery program that led to the synthesis of padsevonil, a first-in-class antiepileptic drug candidate that interacts with two therapeutic targets: synaptic vesicle protein 2 and GABAA receptors. Two PET imaging studies were conducted in healthy volunteers to identify optimal padsevonil target occupancy corresponding to levels associated with effective antiseizure activity in rodent models. Optimal padsevonil occupancy associated with non-clinical efficacy was translatable to humans for both molecular targets: high (>90%), sustained synaptic vesicle protein 2A occupancy and 10–15% transient GABAA receptor occupancy. Rational dose selection enabled clinical evaluation of padsevonil in a Phase IIa proof-of-concept trial (NCT02495844), with a single-dose arm (400 mg bid). Adults with highly treatment-resistant epilepsy, who were experiencing ≥4 focal seizures/week, and had failed to respond to ≥4 antiepileptic drugs, were randomized to receive placebo or padsevonil as add-on to their stable regimen. After a 3-week inpatient double-blind period, all patients received padsevonil during an 8-week outpatient open-label period. The primary endpoint was ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency. Of 55 patients randomized, 50 completed the trial (placebo n = 26; padsevonil n = 24). Their median age was 36 years (range 18–60), and they had been living with epilepsy for an average of 25 years. They were experiencing a median of 10 seizures/week and 75% had failed ≥8 antiepileptic drugs. At the end of the inpatient period, 30.8% of patients on padsevonil and 11.1% on placebo were ≥75% responders (odds ratio 4.14; P = 0.067). Reduction in median weekly seizure frequency was 53.7% and 12.5% with padsevonil and placebo, respectively (unadjusted P = 0.026). At the end of the outpatient period, 31.4% were ≥75% responders and reduction in median seizure frequency was 55.2% (all patients). During the inpatient period, 63.0% of patients on placebo and 85.7% on padsevonil reported treatment-emergent adverse events. Overall, 50 (90.9%) patients who received padsevonil reported treatment-emergent adverse events, most frequently somnolence (45.5%), dizziness (43.6%) and headache (25.5%); only one patient discontinued due to a treatment-emergent adverse event. Padsevonil was associated with a favourable safety profile and displayed clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy. The novel translational approach and the innovative proof-of-concept trial design maximized signal detection in a small patient population in a short duration, expediting antiepileptic drug development for the population with the greatest unmet need in epilepsy.

Fenfluramine hydrochloride for the treatment of seizures in Dravet syndrome: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Dravet syndrome is a rare, treatment-resistant developmental epileptic encephalopathy characterised by multiple types of frequent, disabling seizures. Fenfluramine has been reported to have antiseizure activity in observational studies of photosensitive epilepsy and Dravet syndrome. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of fenfluramine in patients with Dravet syndrome. In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, we enrolled children and young adults with Dravet syndrome. After a 6-week observation period to establish baseline monthly convulsive seizure frequency (MCSF; convulsive seizures were defined as hemiclonic, tonic, clonic, tonic-atonic, generalised tonic-clonic, and focal with clearly observable motor signs), patients were randomly assigned through an interactive web response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to placebo, fenfluramine 0·2 mg/kg per day, or fenfluramine 0·7 mg/kg per day, added to existing antiepileptic agents for 14 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in mean monthly frequency of convulsive seizures during the treatment period compared with baseline in the 0·7 mg/kg per day group versus placebo; 0·2 mg/kg per day versus placebo was assessed as a key secondary outcome. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with two identical protocols NCT02682927 and NCT02826863. Between Jan 15, 2016, and Aug 14, 2017, we assessed 173 patients, of whom 119 patients (mean age 9·0 years, 64 [54%] male) were randomly assigned to receive either fenfluramine 0·2 mg/kg per day (39), fenfluramine 0·7 mg/kg per day (40) or placebo (40). During treatment, the median reduction in seizure frequency was 74·9% in the fenfluramine 0·7 mg/kg group (from median 20·7 seizures per 28 days to 4·7 seizures per 28 days), 42·3% in the fenfluramine 0·2 mg/kg group (from median 17·5 seizures per 28 days to 12·6 per 28 days), and 19·2% in the placebo group (from median 27·3 per 28 days to 22·0 per 28 days). The study met its primary efficacy endpoint, with fenfluramine 0·7 mg/kg per day showing a 62·3% greater reduction in mean MCSF compared with placebo (95% CI 47·7-72·8, p<0·0001); fenfluramine 0·2 mg/kg per day showed a 32·4% reduction in mean MCSF compared with placebo (95% CI 6·2-52·3, p=0·0209). The most common adverse events (occurring in at least 10% of patients and more frequently in the fenfluramine groups) were decreased appetite, diarrhoea, fatigue, lethargy, somnolence, and decreased weight. Echocardiographic examinations revealed valve function within the normal physiological range in all patients during the trial and no signs of pulmonary arterial hypertension. In Dravet syndrome, fenfluramine provided significantly greater reduction in convulsive seizure frequency compared with placebo and was generally well tolerated, with no observed valvular heart disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension. Fenfluramine could be an important new treatment option for patients with Dravet syndrome. Zogenix.