Median Progression-free Survival Time Research Articles

Prognostic value of skeletal muscle measured by CT at the T4 level in advanced EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with ecotinib

Objective: To investigate the prognostic value of skeletal muscle measured by CT at the level of the fourth thoracic vertebra (T4) in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with ecotinib. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed clinical and pathological characteristics of 176 patients with advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC who received ecotinib and underwent chest CT scans at Wuhan Union Hospital between January 2017 and October 2020. Among them, 70 were male and 106 were female, with ages ranging from 27 to 80 (58.6±10.6) years. As of August 21, 2021, the median follow-up duration was 19.2 months (95%CI: 15.3 to 23.7 months). The optimal cut-off value of skeletal muscle density (T4-SMD) on CT images at the T4 level were determined using X-tile software. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to plot progression-free survival curves. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed to analyze factors influencing 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), and a nomogram prognostic model was constructed accordingly. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were utilized to evaluate the predictive value of the nomogram. Results: The T4-SMD [M (Q1,Q3)] of 176 patients was 42.56 (37.05, 45.93) HU. Patients were divided into low T4-SMD group (n=122) and high T4-SMD group (n=54) based on the cut-off value (The values for males and females were 49.44 and 41.41 HU, respectively) of T4-SMD. The median PFS time and 1-year PFS rate in the low T4-SMD group were significantly lower than those in the high T4-SMD group [10.4 (95%CI: 9.3-11.8) vs 13.7 (95%CI: 11.1-18.5) months, 36.1% vs 59.3%, respectively, P=0.034]. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR=3.308, 95%CI: 1.183-9.247, P=0.023), lactate dehydrogenase level (HR=1.852, 95%CI: 1.037-3.307, P=0.037), systemic immune-inflammation index (HR=1.772, 95%CI: 1.019-3.080, P=0.043), and T4-SMD (HR=0.563, 95%CI: 0.325-0.974, P=0.040) were prognostic factors for 1-year PFS in advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC patients treated with ecotinib. A nomogram for predicting 1-year PFS of advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC patients treated with ecotinib was constructed based on the four indicators selected by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The area under the ROC curve of the nomogram was 0.775 (95%CI: 0.676-0.874). The calibration curve showed good consistency between the predicted and actual 1-year PFS. DCA demonstrated good clinical prediction effectiveness of the nomogram. Conclusion: Low T4-SMD is a prognostic risk factor for patients with advanced EGFR-positive NSCLC receiving icotinib therapy.

Abstract PO2-14-09: Baseline genomic alterations and the activity of lasofoxifene (LAS) plus abemaciclib (Abema) in patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC): the ELAINE 2 study

Abstract Introduction: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2-negative (HER2-) breast cancers commonly acquire constitutively active mutations in the ERα-encoding gene (ESR1), resulting in endocrine therapy (ET) resistance. In the phase 2, ELAINE 2 study (NCT04432454), LAS (a breast ER antagonist) combined with Abema provided a median progression-free survival (PFS) of ~13 months (mos) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 66% in patients with endocrine-resistant, ER+/HER2- mBC and ESR1 mutations (mESR1; Damodaran. J Clin Oncol 2023;41:suppl16;1057). Our objective was to describe baseline genomic alterations co-occuring with mESR1 and treatment responses to LAS plus Abema in patients with these concurrent genomic alterations. Methods: Women (age ≥18 yrs) with ER+/HER2- mBC that progressed after prior ET and CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) with an mESR1 detected in blood using the Sysmex-Inostics SafeSeq circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test were enrolled in ELAINE 2. Oral LAS 5 mg/day and Abema (provided by Eli Lilly and Co) 150 mg BID were taken until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. The Guardant360 CDx test was used to identify and describe baseline genomic alterations in ctDNA (including mESR1). Median PFS and CBR were assessed in patients with mESR1 and co-existing baseline genomic alterations. For patients who withdrew before disease progression, their last observation time was used as the progression time for PFS estimation. Data were summarized descriptively with no formal hypothesis testing. Results: Of the 29 patients (median age 60 yrs) enrolled, mutations in ESR1 were identified in 26 by Guardant360; all these 26 patients had received prior CDK4/6i, 21 (81%) prior fulvestrant, and 12 (46%) prior chemotherapy for mBC. Alterations in 39 genes were concurrently identified with mESR1, including TP53 mutations (n=11), PIK3CA mutations (n=8), CCND1 amplifications (n=6), and FGFR1 amplifications (n=5); co-amplification of CCND1 and FGFR1 was identified in 3 patients. LAS plus Abema treatment was associated with a CBR of 73% and a median PFS of 12.9 mos in the 26 patients with mESR1 (Table). CBRs were 63% in the co-occurring PIK3CA mutation subgroup and 64% in the TP53 mutation subgroup; median PFS times were 7.8 and 8.3 mos, respectively. All patients in the CCND1 and FGFR1 amplification subgroups achieved clinical benefit (CBR 100%) and the median PFS was 16.6 mos for both subgroups. In patients with mESR1 and co-alterations in ≥2 other genes of interest (PIK3CA, FGFR1, CCND1, TP53, ERBB2, CCNE1, or RB1), CBR was 83% and median PFS was 16.6 mos. Conclusion: Using Guardant360 ctDNA profiling from patients in ELAINE 2, we demonstrate that other baseline genomic alterations are frequently detected concurrently with mESR1 in the endocrine resistant setting, but without apparent compromise on the efficacy of LAS plus Abema. These results should be interpreted with caution considering the small numbers of patients and the exploratory nature of the analysis. The ELAINE 2 study suggests the potential of LAS plus Abema for treating ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- mBC in the post-CDK4/6i setting. This will be further evaluated in the larger, registrational, phase 3, ELAINE 3 study (NCT05696626) that compares LAS plus Abema with fulvestrant plus Abema. Table. Treatment response by genomic alterations concurrent with ESR1 mutations (n=26). aFor patients who withdrew before disease progression, the last observation time was used as the progression time for PFS estimation. bOther genes of interest include PIK3CA, FGFR1, CCND1, TP53, ERBB2, CCNE1, or RB1. CBR, clinical benefit rate; mPFS, median progression-free survival. Citation Format: Senthil Damodaran, Massimo Cristofanilli, Matthew Goetz, Ciara O'Sullivan, Gary Riordan, Hope Rugo, Daniel Stover, Seth Wander, Dominic Carroll, Paul V. Plourde, David J Portman, Einav Nili-Gal Yam. Baseline genomic alterations and the activity of lasofoxifene (LAS) plus abemaciclib (Abema) in patients with ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC): the ELAINE 2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-14-09.

A real-world experience of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents vs. monotherapy hypomethylating agents in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients

Introduction:Current clinical research has reported the effectiveness and safety of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents (VEN-HMA) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). Thus, this study aimed to examine the effectiveness and safety of VEN-HMA therapy in patients with MDS and CMML and compared its short-term and long-term therapeutic effects with HMA monotherapy.Method:We analyzed data from our center, comprising 19 patients with MDS and CMML who received VEN-HMA therapy, compared to 32 patients treated with HMA monotherapy.Results:The overall response rate (ORR) in the VEN-HMA group was 73.7%, compared to 59.4% in the HMA group. The survival analysis revealed that the median overall survival (mOS) time in the VEN-HMA group was 16 months, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) time of 9 months, both of which were longer than those observed in the HMA group (p < 0.05). Key adverse events (AEs) included grade 3–4 neutropenia (89.5% in VEN-HMA group vs. 87.5% in HMA group), grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia (73.7% vs. 71.9%), and anemia (73.7% vs. 90.6%). Infection of grade 3 or higher occurred in 63.2% of patients in the VEN-HMA group and 65.6% of patients in the HMA group.Discussion:Our study has confirmed the effectiveness and safety of the combined treatment of HMAs and venetoclax, which offers significant advantages to patients due to the relatively high and rapid response rates.

Abstract PO1-15-07: Subtyping-directed precision treatment refines traditional one-size-fits-all therapy in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a sub-study of the MULAN umbrella trial

Abstract Background: The standard approach of using one-size-fits-all endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancers has faced significant challenges due to variations in treatment response among individuals. Consequently, there is still an urgent need to understand the molecular biology of HR+/HER2- breast cancer and explore precision treatment strategy. Methods: We established a multiomics cohort (n = 351), multicenter real-world clinical cohorts (n = 643), a prospective clinical cohort (MULAN trial), and a drug-testing platform containing patient-derived organoids (n = 126) and patient-derived tumor fragments (n = 49) of HR+/HER2- breast cancers. Integrating "bench" and “bedside” data, we conducted comprehensive preclinical and clinical translational research on precision strategies in HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Results: We implemented a comprehensive classification system for HR+/HER2- breast cancer, comprising four distinct subtypes. We further demonstrated the efficacy and mechanisms of subtyping-directed precision treatment strategies through clinical cohort studies, omics analysis and functional assays: endocrine therapy alone for the canonical luminal subtype; the addition of CDK4/6 inhibitor and PARP inhibitor for the proliferative subtype; the immunotherapy for the immunogenic subtype; and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the receptor tyrosine kinase-driven subtype. Using clinically applicable subtyping methods, we validated that matched precision treatment strategies outperformed unmatched approaches in a real-world cohort, almost doubling the median progression-free survival time for patients with refractory advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer (9.83 months [95% CI, 5.74-13.93] vs 4.77 months [95% CI, 3.35-6.18]; hazard ratio 0.64 [95% CI, 0.41-0.99]). Importantly, the first-stage analysis of the MULAN phase II umbrella clinical trial (NCT04355858) verified the higher objective response rate (88.9%, 95%CI: 51.7%-99.7%) of the subtyping-directed precision treatment. Conclusion: Our study emphasizes the superiority of subtyping-directed precision treatment strategies for HR+/HER2- breast cancer, refines traditional “one-size-fits-all” therapy, and facilitates the translation of precision treatment strategies from bench to bedside. Overall study design Part 1 Subtype Molecular Characteristics: Molecular features of the four subtypes of HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Part 2 Multidimensional Efficacy Validation: Integrating data from a multiomics cohort, real-world study, drug testing platform and prospective clinical research to validate the subtyping-directed precision treatment strategy in HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Part 3 Subtyping-directed Precision Treatment Strategy: Integrating clinical cohort studies, omics analysis and functional assays revealed the heterogeneity of treatment response in HR+/HER2- breast cancer, and proposed a subtyping-directed precision treatment strategy. CIN, chromosomal instability; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; CNA, copy-number alteration; ER, estrogen receptor; HR, hormone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2. Citation Format: Xiu-Zhi Zhu, Xi Jin, Hu-Yun-Long Zhang, Xiyu Liu, Yi-Fan Zhou, Yi-Yu Chen, Tong Fu, Ming-Liang Jin, Ya-Xin Zhao, Yi-Fan Xie, Ruo-Xi Wang, Zhong-Hua Wang, Lei Fan, Yi-Zhou Jiang, Zhi-Ming Shao. Subtyping-directed precision treatment refines traditional one-size-fits-all therapy in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a sub-study of the MULAN umbrella trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-15-07.

Evaluation of clinical response and prognostic factors in canine multicentric lymphoma treated with first rescue therapy.

Despite an initial strong response in most dogs with multicentric lymphoma treated with chemotherapy, relapse remains common. There is no clearly superior first rescue protocol described either for resistant or relapsed canine multicentric lymphoma. The objectives of this study were to assess clinical response and outcomes for canine multicentric lymphoma treated with first rescue protocols. The secondary objective was to assess prognostic variables for dogs undergoing these protocols. This was a bi-institutional retrospective cohort study. Two hundred and sixty-five dogs were treated with first rescue chemotherapy, including anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy (CHOP-like, n = 50), nitrosourea alkylating agent-rich chemotherapy (n = 45), anthracycline-based or related compound chemotherapy (n = 34), or nitrosourea single-agent chemotherapy (n = 136). The overall median progression free survival time of first rescue protocol was 56.0 days (0-455 days). Important prognostic factors identified for first rescue protocol included the attainment of a complete response to the first rescue chemotherapy (p < .001), the use of a CHOP-like first rescue protocol (p = .009), duration of first remission (HR 0.997, p = .028), and if prednisolone was included in the first rescue protocol (HR 0.41, p = .003). Adverse events (AE) were common, with 81.1% of dogs experiencing at least one AE during first rescue chemotherapy. This study highlights the need for improved first rescue therapies to provide durable remission in canine resistant or relapsed lymphoma.

Alternating rabacfosadine and doxorubicin for treatment of naïve canine lymphoma.

The current standard of care treatment for canine lymphoma is a multi-agent, CHOP-based chemotherapy protocol. Single agent doxorubicin (DOX) is less burdensome; however, multi-agent chemotherapy protocols are often superior. The recently approved drug rabacfosadine (RAB, Tanovea) provides an attractive option for combination therapy with DOX, as both drugs demonstrate efficacy against lymphoma and possess different mechanisms of action. A previous study evaluating alternating RAB/DOX reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 84%, with a median progression-free survival time (PFS) of 194 days. The aim of this prospective trial was to evaluate the same protocol in an additional population of dogs. Fifty-nine dogs with treatment naïve lymphoma were enrolled. RAB (1.0 mg/kg IV) was alternated with DOX (30 mg/m2 IV) every 21 days for up to six total treatments (3 cycles). Response assessment and adverse event (AE) evaluation were performed every 21 days using VCOG criteria. The ORR was 93% (79% CR, 14% PR). The median time to maximal response was 21.5 days; median PFS was 199 days. T cell immunophenotype and lack of treatment response were predictive of inferior outcomes. AEs were mostly gastrointestinal. Six dogs developed presumed or confirmed pulmonary fibrosis; four were grade 5. One dog experienced grade 3 extravasation injury with RAB that resolved with supportive treatment. These data mirror those of the previously reported RAB/DOX study, and support the finding that alternating RAB/DOX is a reasonable treatment option for canine lymphoma.

Transarterial chemoembolization combined with radiofrequency ablation for medium and large hepatocellular carcinoma: insufficient ablation is associated with intrahepatic distant metastasis and extrahepatic metastasis.

To compare the prognosis of complete and insufficient ablation of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating medium and large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to explore the differences in recurrence patterns between the two groups. Patients´ medical records and imaging data of patients with confirmed HCC from January 2014 to January 2022 were collected. These patients were divided into 2 groups: complete ablation (n=172) and insufficient ablation (n=171). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier curve and the log-rank test was used to compared. Fisher's exact test was used to compare recurrence patterns between the two groups. The median OS time was 72.8 months (95%CI:69.5-76.1) and 62.0 months (95%CI: 55.3-68.7) in the complete and insufficient ablation groups, respectively. The median PFS time in the complete ablation group was 67.8 months (95% CI: 65.2-70.4) and 38.6 months (95%CI: 29.8-47.4) in the insufficient ablation group. The OS and PFS rates of the complete ablation group were significantly better than those of the insufficient ablation group (P<0.001). In the complete ablation group, 25(41%) patients experienced local tumor progression(LTP), 36(59%) experienced intrahepatic distant progression(IDP), and 0(0%) experienced extrahepatic progression (EP). In the insufficient ablation group, 51 (32.1%) patients experienced LTP, 96 (60.4%) experienced IDP, and 12 (7.5%) experienced EP. The progression patterns of the two groups were statistically significant (P=0.039). Insufficient ablation indicates a poor survival outcome of TACE combined with RFA for medium and large HCC and can promote intrahepatic distant and extrahepatic metastasis.

First-Line Anlotinib Treatment for Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Chemotherapy-Ineligible Patients: An Open-label, Single-arm, Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Standard treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (LA/M STS) is chemotherapy based on anthracyclines, but patient tolerance of chemotherapy is limited. The present trial (NCT03792542) investigated the use of anlotinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced STS, in particular liposarcoma (LPS). Eligible patients were previously untreated, pathologically confirmed, unresectable LA/M STS cases. Anlotinib was given orally at a dose of 12 mg once daily from day 1 to day 14 every 3 weeks until disease progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs) occurred. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints overall survival (OS), the objective response rate and the disease control rate (DCR). The safety profile was also evaluated. Forty patients were enrolled from April 2019 to Jun 2022 and are included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The median PFS was 6.83 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.17-8.71] and the median OS 27.40 months (95% CI: 16.43-not evaluable); 1 patient reached partial response and 26 attained stable disease, with a DCR of 67.5% (27/40). Median PFS and OS times for LPS patients were 8.71 and 16.23 months, respectively. Ten (25.0%) patients had treatment-related AEs ≥ grade 3, with in particular a higher incidence of hypertension (15.0%) and proteinuria (7.5%). The findings suggest a potential benefit in employing front-line anlotinib to treat patients with STS, who are not eligible for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Of note, the clinical outcomes for the LPS subgroup of patients were encouraging.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Combined With Lenvatinib With or Without PD-1 Inhibitors as Initial Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare the clinical benefit and safety of the triple combination of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), lenvatinib and programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors with the dual combination of SBRT and lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Methods and MaterialsPatients with uHCC who received SBRT in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors or SBRT in combination with lenvatinib alone as first-line treatment from October 2018 to July 2022 were reviewed in this study. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). The second endpoints were intra-hepatic PFS (IHPFS), extra-hepatic PFS (EHPFS) and objective remission rate (ORR). In addition, safety profiles were assessed by analyzing treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) between the two groups to assess safety profiles. ResultsIn total, 214 patients with uHCC who received combination therapy were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 146 patients received triple combination therapy of SBRT, lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (SBRT-L-P group), and 68 patients received dual therapy of SBRT and lenvatinib (SBRT-L group). The median OS times of the two groups were 31.2 months and 17.4 months, respectively (P<0.001). The median PFS time was significantly longer in the SBRT-L-P group than that in SBRT-L group (15.6 months vs. 8.8 months, p<0.001). Additionally, the median IHPFS (17.5 vs. 9.9 months, p<0.001) and EHPFS (20.9 vs. 11.6 months, p<0.001) were significantly longer in the SBRT-L-P group than that in SBRT-L group. The ORR in the SBRT-L-P group was higher than that in the SBRT-L group (63.0 vs. 39.7%, p=0.002). The incidence and severity of TRAEs in the SBRT-L-P group were comparable to those in the SBRT-L group. ConclusionThe use of both lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors with SBRT in patients with uHCC was associated with improved overall survival compared to lenvatinib and SBRT alone with a manageable safety profile.

[Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib-Containing Regimens in the Treatment of Patients with Multiple Myeloma].

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of ixazomib-containing regimens in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of 32 MM patients treated with a combined regimen containing ixazomib in the Hematology Department of the First People's Hospital of Lianyungang from January 2020 to February 2022. Among the 32 patients, 15 patients were relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM) (R/RMM group), 17 patients who responded to bortezomib induction therapy but converted to ixazomib-containing regimen due to adverse events (AE) or other reasons (conversion treatment group). The treatment included IPD regimen (ixazomib+pomalidomide+dexamethasone), IRD regimen (ixazomib+lenalidomide+dexamethasone), ICD regimen (ixazomib+cyclophosphamide+dexamethasone), ID regimen (ixazomib+dexamethasone). Of 15 R/RMM patients, overall response rate (ORR) was 53.3%(8/15), among them, 1 achieved complete response (CR), 2 achieved very good partial response (VGPR) and 5 achieved partial response (PR). The ORR of the IPD, IRD, ICD and ID regimen group were 100%（3/3）, 42.9%（3/7）, 33.3%（1/3）, 50%（1/2）， respectively， there was no statistically significant difference in ORR between four groups (χ 2=3.375, P =0.452). The ORR of patients was 50% after first-line therapy, 42.9% after second line therapy, 60% after third line therapy or more, with no statistically significant difference among them (χ2=2.164, P =0.730). In conversion treatment group, ORR was 88.2%(15/17), among them, 6 patients achieved CR, 5 patients achieved VGPR and 4 patients achieved PR. There was no statistically significant difference in ORR between the IPD（100%， 3/3）, IRD（100%， 6/6）, ICD（100%， 3/3） and ID（60%， 3/5） regimen groups (χ2=3.737，P =0.184). The median progression-free survival (PFS) time of R/RMM patients was 9 months (95% CI : 6.6-11.4 months), the median overall survival (OS) time was 18 months (95% CI : 11.8-24.4 months). The median PFS time of conversion treatment group was 15 months (95% CI : 7.3-22.7 months), the median OS time not reached. A total of 10 patients suffered grade 3- 4 adverse event (AE). The common hematological toxicities were leukocytopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia. The common non-hematological toxicities were gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, nausea and vomit), peripheral neuropathy, fatigue and infections. Grade 1-2 peripheral neurotoxicity occurred in 7 patients. The ixazomib-based chemotherapy regimens are safe and effective in R/RMM therapy, particularly for conversion patients who are effective for bortezomib therapy. The AE was manageable and safe.

Targeted DNA Sequencing Reveals Molecular Factors Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Recurrent Glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic significance of molecular alterations in recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) remains unclear. METHODS: 121 consecutive glioblastoma (GBM) patients who underwent re-resection at a single institution from 2016-2021 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) at time of initial diagnosis. DNA mutations from re-resection samples were assessed with a CLIA certified next-generation targeted DNA sequencing assay. Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from re-resection were analyzed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: Median age at first recurrence was 57 years (range, 27-78), and median follow up from re-resection was 11 months. Salvage therapy comprised re-irradiation (n = 52, 43%), temozolomide (TMZ) (n = 39, 32%), lomustine (n = 47, 39%), and/or bevacizumab (n = 22, 18%). Median OS and PFS times were 12.1 and 4.4 months, respectively. Median tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 4 mut/Mb (range, 1-650), microsatellite instability (MSI) was 1.16% (range, 0-20), and MGMT methylation was present in 71 (59%) patients. Longer OS was found after postoperative TMZ (19.1 vs. 9.1), KPS &gt;70 (13.6 vs. 11.1), and/or re-irradiation (12.6 vs. 8.4) (p &lt; .05 for each). On multivariate analysis, TMZ (HR 0.2, 0.079-0.48), re-irradiation (HR 0.27, 0.12-0.58), and mutations in the PDGFRA (HR 0.24, 0.067-0.83) or PTEN (HR 2.3, 1.1-4.8) genes on targeted sequencing were associated with longer OS after re-resection (p &lt; .05). Multivariate predictors of re-irradiation response included MSI &gt; 1.16 (HR 0.25, 0.084-0.75), and mutations in PDGFRA (HR 0.04, 0.005-0.33), TERT (HR 0.16, 0.033-0.78), or PIK3R1 (HR 0.18, 0.041-0.8) genes. In the 46 matched primary/recurrent tumors, 40 (46%) had a longitudinal change in a mutation and 9 (24%) demonstrated hypermutation, of which 4 (57%) had simultaneous mismatch repair deficiencies. CONCLUSIONS: Our study identifies molecular factors associated with survival and response to re-irradiation in rGBM.

Efficacy and safety of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents in the treatment of 83 patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of venetoclax (VEN) combined with hypomethylating agents (HMA) in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS) and analyze the factors influencing their therapeutic effect. Methods: The clinical data of 83 patients with HR-MDS who were diagnosed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between November 2019 and May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with VEN combined with HMA. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to depict the survival curves, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival between the groups. Results: The median age was 57 (15-82) years old, and 51 patients (61.4%) were male. Forty-five patients (54.2%) were initially treated with HMA, 23 (27.7%) received ≤4 cycles of HMA, and 15 (18.1%) demonstrated HMA failure. At the median follow-up of 10.3 (0.6-34.4) months, the overall response rate (ORR) was 62.7% (52/83), including 18 patients (21.7%) with a complete response (CR), 14 (16.9%) with a bone marrow CR (mCR) with hematological improvement, and 20 (24.1%) with a mCR. The ORR of patients with initial treatment, ≤4 HMA cycles, and HMA failure were 66.7%, 60.9%, and 53.3%, respectively (P=0.641). The median overall survival time was 14.6 (95% CI 7.2-22.0) months, and the median progression-free survival time was 8.9 (95% CI 6.7-11.1) months. The multivariate analysis showed that serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) ≥90 U/L (OR=14.574, 95% CI 3.036-69.951, P=0.001), TP53 mutation (OR=13.052, 95% CI 1.982-85.932, P=0.008), and U2AF1 mutation (OR=7.720, 95% CI 1.540-38.698, P=0.013) were independent risk factors for poor efficacy of VEN combined with HMA. Hematological toxicity occurred in all patients, and the incidence of treatment-induced grade 3-4 leukopenia was 48.2% (40/83). Infection was the most common non-hematological adverse event, mainly pulmonary infection (31.3%) . Conclusion: VEN combined with HMA had a high response rate in patients with HR-MDS, both at initial treatment and with HMA failure. ALP ≥ 90 U/L, TP53 mutation, and U2AF1 mutation were independent risk factors for non-response to treatment.

Palliative primary tumor resection may not offer survival benefits for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms, one multicenter retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe efficacy of palliative primary tumor resection (PTR) in improving prognosis for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has not been fully explored.MethodsWe performed one retrospective cohort study and recruited 68 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal NENs from two Chinese medical centers between 2000 and 2022. All patients were assigned to PTR group and no PTR group. The clinicopathological manifestation data were carefully collected, and the survival outcomes were compared between the two groups using Kaplan–Meier methods. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to minimize confounding bias. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors.ResultsA total of 32 patients received PTR, and the other 36 patients did not. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 4 and 22 months in the whole cohort, respectively. For patients who received no PTR, the median OS was 16 months, and the 1-year OS rate and 3-year OS rate were 56.4% and 39.6%, respectively. For patients who received PTR, the median OS was 24 months, and the 1-year OS rate and 3-year OS rate were 67.9% and 34.1%, respectively. However, the Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank test demonstrated no significant survival difference between the two groups (P = 0.963). Moreover, palliative PTR was also not confirmed as a prognostic factor in subsequent univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses in both the original and matched cohorts. Only histological differentiation was identified as an independent prognostic factor affecting PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02–3.41, P = 0.043] and OS [HR = 3.70, 95% CI: 1.09–12.48, P = 0.035] in the original cohort.ConclusionsPalliative PTR may not offer survival benefits for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal NENs.

Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer (YPB-001).

The present multicenter prospective observational study investigated the effectiveness and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and those with RPC contacting major vessels, with respect to a historical control of upfront surgery. Patients with BRPC and RPC contacting major vessels were prospectively registered and administered NAC with durations and regimens determined by the corresponding treating physician. Our primary aim was to assess the R0 resection rate, and secondary aim was to evaluate safety, resection rate, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and response rate. Fifty of 52 enrolled patients were analyzed; 2 with serious comorbidities died during treatment. Thirty-one patients underwent resection, with R0 resection being achieved in 26 (52% of total and 84% of all resected cases). Univariate and multivariate analyses indicated age (≥75 years) as the only independent predictor of nonresection. Median progression-free survival and median survival time were longer in the prospective cohort than in the historical cohort. Overall, NAC for BRPC in real-world setting might yield R0 resection rates similar to those reported in previous clinical studies. Development of safe regimens and management strategies that can maintain treatment intensity in geriatric patients is warranted.

Efficacy of adding levofloxacin to gemcitabine and nanoparticle-albumin-binding paclitaxel combination therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: study protocol for a multicenter, randomized phase 2 trial (T-CORE2201)

BackgroundAdvanced pancreatic cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. For patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, gemcitabine and nanoparticle albumin-binding paclitaxel (nabPTX) combination (GEM/nabPTX) therapy is one of the recommended first-line treatments. Several retrospective studies have suggested that the addition of levofloxacin improves the efficacy of GEM/nabPTX therapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. This prospective study aims to evaluate whether the addition of antibiotics improves the treatment efficacy of GEM/nabPTX as a first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.MethodsThis multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase 2 trial will included 140 patients. Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the GEM/nabPTX therapy group or the GEM/nabPTX plus levofloxacin group. The primary endpoint for the two groups is median progression-free survival time (mPFS) for the full analysis set (FAS). The secondary endpoints for the two groups are median overall survival (mOS), response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse event (AE) for the FAS and mPFS, mOS, RR, DCR, and AE for the per-protocol set. This study will enroll patients treated with GEM/nabPTX as the first-line chemotherapy for stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma.DiscussionGEM/nabPTX is a standard first-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Recently, the superiority of 5-fluorouracil, liposomal irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination therapy (NALIRIFOX) to GEM/nabPTX as first-line therapy for pancreatic cancer has been reported. However, the efficacy of NALIRIFOX is inadequate. Based on previous retrospective studies, it is hypothesized that treatment efficacy will improve when levofloxacin is added to GEM/nabPTX therapy. If the AEs (such as leukopenia, neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy) that occur at an increased rate with levofloxacin and GEM/nabPTX combination therapy can be carefully monitored and properly managed, this simple intervention can be expected to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.Trial registrationThis study was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT; registry number: jRCTs021230005).

The prognosis of patients with primary pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma: Treated with surgery or chemotherapy?

The goal of this project was to evaluate the effect of surgical treatment and the long-term survival of patients with staged IE/IIE pulmonary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. From January 2004 to December 2018, we retrospectively analysed 96 patients diagnosed with low-stage primary pulmonary MALT lymphoma according to the modified Ann Arbor staging system (IE/IIE). We compared the outcomes of different treatment modalities for staged IE/IIE MALT lymphoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the differences were compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used in this study. The median PFS time of low-staged MALT lymphomas was 118 months. The overall survival and PFS of the radical surgery group and the biopsy + chemotherapy group suggested no significant difference (P = 0.63, P = 0.65). Patients positive for Blc-2 and Ki-67 suffered from a compromised PFS (P = 0.023, P = 0.006). The Cox adjusted proportional hazards model analysis suggested that surgical procedures were not protective factors for patients with low-staged (IE/IIE) pulmonary MALT lymphoma, whereas being positive for Blc-2 and Ki-67 was a risk factor for patients with low-staged pulmonary MALT lymphoma (hazard ratio: 9.567; P = 0.044; hazard ratio: 6.042, P = 0.049). Our findings suggested that for staged IE/IIE pulmonary MALT lymphoma, radical surgical resection did not provide a survival benefit compared with chemotherapy after biopsy. Thus, radical surgery may be avoided unless biopsy is necessary for a diagnosis that requires sublobar resection. For those lesions that were Blc-2- or Ki-67-positive, compromised survival may be suggested.

Prognostic significance of bone marrow fibrosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphomas. The aim of this study is to determine the relationship between the increase in the degree of fibrosis in the bone marrow and prognosis and mortality in newly diagnosed DLBCL. Bone marrow biopsy of 153 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients was determined by staining with reticulin, Masson's trichrome histochemical stain, and the degree of fibrosis was determined. In the bone marrow biopsy performed at the time of diagnosis, bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) was observed in 70 patients. While BMF-1 was detected in 42 patients (60%), BMF-2 was detected in 25 patients (35%) and BMF-3 was detected in 3 patients (4%). As the degree of BMF increased, the median overall survival and median progression-free survival times were significantly shorter (p: 0.008), (p < 0.001). In patients with an increased degree of BMF, a significant decrease in leukocyte and neutrophil counts was observed after chemotherapy (p: 0.004). According to the results of the multivariate Cox regression model, it was determined that high NCCN-IPI risk (HR: 8.25; %95 CI: 1.09-62.52; p = 0.041) and being BMF ≥ 2 (HR: 3.75; %95 CI: 1.65-8.51; p = 0.002), increased the risk of death (p = 0.002, -2 loglikelihood = 392,553). When the literature was reviewed, it was seen that this study was the first to define that bone marrow fibrosis grade 2 and above in DLBCL is a prognostic marker associated with worse survival. In the bone marrow pathology, which is examined to detect advanced disease in DLBCL, besides lymphomatous involvement, the detection of fibrosis grade is very important.

[Application of the Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) in the prognostic assessment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma].

Objective: To investigate the prognostic value of the Second Revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) . Methods: The retrospective study was performed in 326 NDMM patients with immunomodulatory drugs and/or proteasome inhibitors as the first-line treatment attending the Department of Hematology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China, from December 2012 to March 2022. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the survival analysis, with the Log-rank test comparing the between-group differences and Cox proportional risk regression modeling A multifactorial analysis was performed. Results: ①326 patients were included in the study, 190 of whom were males. The median age was 63 years, and the median followup time was 37 months. R2-ISS can effectively predict prognosis, particularly for R-ISS Ⅱ patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time of R2-ISS Ⅰ, R2-ISS Ⅱ, R2-ISS Ⅲ, and R2-ISS Ⅳ was 52, 29, 20, and 15 months (P<0.001), while the median overall survival (OS) time was 91, 60, 44, and 36 months (P<0.001). Multifactor analysis revealed that ISS Ⅱ, ISS Ⅲ, del (17p), t (4;14), 1q+, LDH increased, and age >65 years old were independent negative prognostic factors for OS. ISS Ⅱ, ISS Ⅲ, del (17p), t (4;14), 1q+, and LDH were independent negative prognostic factors for PFS. ②The C-index score of R2-ISS was 0.724, higher than that of R-ISS (0.678), indicating high prediction efficiency. ③The median PFS for 1q+-related double-hit in R2-ISS Ⅲ and Ⅳ were 20, 15 months (P=0.084) and the median OS were 35, 36 months (P=0.786), respectively. In R2-ISS Ⅲ, there were twenty-seven cases of 1q+-related double-hit, sixty-one cases of 1q+ single abnormality, and sixty-eight cases with no 1q+. The median PFS for the three groups were 20, 18, and 21 months (P=0.974), while the median OS was 35, 47, and 56 months (P=0.042), respectively. Adjusting the assignment of 1q+ to 1, the median PFS and OS of different R2-ISS stages differed significantly after regrouping (P<0.001) . Conclusions: The prognostic stratification value of R2-ISS is higher than R-ISS, particularly in the highly heterogeneous R-ISS Ⅱ population. Adjusting the assignment of the 1q+-related double-hit can improve R2-ISS, which should be validated in future studies with multi-center and expanded cases.

Impact of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on postoperative long-term survival in patients with nonsmall hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BackgroundThe purpose of this propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was to compare the effects of preoperative transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and non-TACE on the long-term survival of patients who undergo radical hepatectomy.MethodsPSM analysis was performed for 387 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (single > 3 cm or multiple) who underwent radical resection of HCC at our centre from January 2011 to June 2018. The patients were allocated to a preoperative TACE group (n = 77) and a non-TACE group (n = 310). The main outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) since the treatment date.ResultsAfter PSM, 67 patients were included in each of the TACE and non-TACE groups. The median PFS times in the preoperative TACE and non-TACE groups were 24.0 and 11.3 months, respectively (p = 0.0117). The median OS times in the preoperative TACE and non-TACE groups were 41.5 and 29.0 months, respectively (p = 0.0114). Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that preoperative TACE (hazard ratio, 1.733; 95% CI, 1.168–2.570) and tumour thrombosis (hazard ratio, 0.323; 95% CI, 0.141–0.742) were independent risk factors significantly associated with OS.ConclusionsPreoperative TACE is related to improving PFS and OS after resection of HCC. Preoperative TACE and tumour thrombus volume were also found to be independent risk factors associated with OS.

Modified R-BAC plus BTK inhibitor regimen in newly diagnosed young patients with mantle cell lymphoma: a real-world retrospective study.

To explore the optimal treatment for young patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), we compared the efficacy and safety of R-CHOP/R-DHAP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone/rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine and cisplatin) and R-BAP (rituximab, bendamustine, cytarabine, and prednisone) plus BTK (Bruton's tyrosine kinase) inhibitors in newly diagnosed patients. Eighty-three young patients (≤ 65years old) with newly diagnosed MCL admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 1, 2014, to June 1, 2023, using R-CHOP/R-DHAP or R-BAP plus BTK inhibitor were assessed in this study. The median age at presentation was 60 (42-65) years in 83 patients, including 64 males and 19 females; 59 were treated with R-CHOP/R-DHAP regimen chemotherapy, and 24 were treated with R-BAP in combination with the BTK inhibitor regimen. The median follow-up was 17months (2-86months) in 83 patients, and the median PFS (progression-free survival) time was not reached. The CRR (complete response rate) of the R-BAP group was higher than that of the R-CHOP/R-DHAP group (87.5% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.005). The ORR (overall response rate) was not significantly different between the two groups (ORR: 91.7% vs. 84.7%, P = 0.497). The PFS (progression-free survival) of the R-BAP group was longer than that of the R-CHOP/R-DHAP group (P = 0.013), whereas OS was not significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.499). The most common adverse effect in both groups was hematotoxicity, with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 lymphopenia and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in the R-BAP group than in the R-CHOP/R-DHAP group (P = 0.015 and P = 0.039). Male sex (HR = 4.257, P = 0.013), LDH (lactate dehydrogenase) ≥ 245 U/L (HR = 3.221, P = 0.012), pleomorphic-blastoid (HR = 2.802, P = 0.043) and R-CHOP/R-DHAP regimen (HR = 7.704, P = 0.047) were independent risk factors for PFS. Ki67 ≥ 30% (HR = 8.539, P = 0.005) was an independent risk factor for OS. First-line treatment with R-BAP in combination with BTK inhibitor improved CRR and prolonged PFS in young patients with mantle cell lymphoma and adverse events were tolerable.