<h3>Background</h3> Fragile elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have low survival rate due to complications, poor tolerance and complianceand lack of effective treatment. This prospective multicenter non-randomized controlled study designed to assessment the efficacy and safety of IAd versus IRd in fragile elderly NDMM. <h3>Methods</h3> This ongoing trial is conducted at 14 hospitals. Inclusion criteria was aged ≥ 65 years, IMWG GA score ≥ 2 or Mayo geriatric vulnerability scoring system defined as vulnerable. Patients with acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were excluded. Schemes included IAd (ixazomib 4mg d1,8,15, liposome doxorubicin 40mg d1,dex 20mg d1,8,15,22), IRd (ixazomib 4mg d1,8,15, lenalidomide 25mg d1-14, dex 20mg d1,8,15,22), in 4-week cycles. For patients with effective response (≥ PR) after 6 to 8 cycles, Id maintenance initiated until progression. The study was powered for a primary endpoint of ORR,with PFS,OS,toxicity,health-related Qol as secondary endpoints. This study planned to enroll 120 patients, 60 in each group (chiCTR1900024917). <h3>Results</h3> From Oct 2019 to May 2021, 95 patients were enrolled, median age 71(65-88) yrs, 29.5% of patients ≥75 yrs,18.9% of patients with renal insufficiency(eGFR < 30ml/min, n=13).Efficacy was evaluated in 89 patients,6 were not evaluated, of them,1 had not completed first cycle,2 had dropped out after first cycle,and 3 died in the first course. All patients with renal insufficiency (except for one case), paraplegia, or bedridden were enrolled in IAd group. At a median follow-up of 10 mons (1-20), total ORR was 80.9%, with 80.9% (38/47) in IAd and 81.0% (34/42) in IRd. Median PFS was 16 mons in IAd and was not achieved in IRd. Median OS was not achieved in both two groups,with 12 mon-OS at 81.0%. Cytogenetic high-risk was defined by t(4;14),t(14;16),t(14;20),del(17p) or 1q21 amplification.64.2% of patients stratified as high-risk, 21.0% of patients had ≥ 2 high-risk cytogenetic, median OS was 14 mons, while the median OS of patients with 1 or none high-risk genetic was not achieved (p=0.05).9.5% patients developed hematological grade 3 or above,13.7% patients developed gastrointestinal AE above grade 3 (IAd, n=10; IRd, n=3),13.7% patients with pneumonia(IAd, n=9; IRd,n=4). IRd regimen saw more serious neurotoxicity,5 patients had delirium, mental disorder or cerebral infarction. Fragile elderly patients are relatively vulnerable to death.16 patients died, included 7 deaths due to progression, 4 early deaths (≤60 days),4 treatment abandonment, and 1 unexplained sudden death. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Overall efficacy and safety results support the use of IAD or IRD as frontline therapy for fragile elderly MM patients. Both regimenswere effective, with an overall response rate of 80.9% and 12-month OS of 81.0%. AE were tolerable. Mortality rate are comparably high in fragile elderly MM patients,it is still a challenge for treatment.