Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap Research Articles

Characterization of the MSAP Flap in Head and Neck Surgical Oncology: A 3D Cadaveric Study.

The medial sural artery (MSA) perforator flap is a versatile free flap. However, the cutaneous perforators are not well characterized. The objectives of this pilot anatomical study were to: (1) visualize in three-dimensions, as in-situ, the origin, course, and distribution of the cutaneous perforators, (2) characterize the number and frequency of the perforators, and (3) quantify mean pedicle length. Thirteen cadaveric specimens were dissected, digitized, and modeled in 3D. Three-dimensional models and dissection photographs were used to determine the origin, course, number, distribution, and pedicle length of MSA perforators. The most common pattern consisted of three perforators (39% of specimens). The maximum number of perforators identified was four (23%). The majority of specimens (92%) had a cutaneous perforator originating from the lateral branch of the MSA and coursed most frequently in the second (43%) and third (37%) quartiles of the length of the tibia. Mean pedicle length was 19.1 ± 6.9 cm. Perforators originating from the medial branch of the MSA were significantly (p < 0.05) shorter than those from the lateral branch and were found to course only in the first quartile. The 3D models constructed in this study provide a comprehensive overview of the location and course of the perforators, enabling measurement of parameters in 3D-space. Anatomical characterization of the MSA perforator flap using 3D analysis can assist reconstructive surgeons in understanding the relevant anatomy and optimizing the surgical technique for flap harvest. N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

Application of three-dimensional ultrasound technique in repairing dorsal foot wounds with medial sural artery perforator flaps

To investigate the accuracy of positioning perforator of medial sural artery with three-dimensional ultrasound technique guided by a wide band linear matrix array volume transducer probe before operation, and the effectiveness of the flap design based on this in repairing the dorsal foot wounds. Between January 2019 and December 2022, 30 patients with skin and soft tissue defects of the dorsal foot were treated. There were 19 males and 11 females, with an average age of 43.9 years (range, 22-63 years). There were 12 cases of traffic accident injury, 15 cases of heavy crushing injury, and 3 cases of machine injury. The time from injury to hospitalization was 1-8 hours (mean, 3.5 hours). The wounds in size of 5 cm×3 cm to 17 cm×5 cm were thorough debrided and covered with vacuum sealing drainage dressing. Then the wounds were repaired with the medial sural artery perforator flaps after no obvious infection observed. To obtain the complete three-dimensional image, the number and position of the medial sural artery perforator branches and the position of the main blood vessels in the muscle were detected and recorded by wide band linear matrix array volume transducer probe before operation. Suitable perforating branches were selected to design the flap and guide the flap incision on this basis. The size of the perforating flap ranged from 6 cm×4 cm to 18 cm×6 cm. The sensitivity and positive predictive value were calculated by comparing preoperative exploration with intraoperative observation of perforating branches, so as to evaluate the positioning accuracy of three-dimensional ultrasound technique. The donor sites were sutured directly in 25 cases and repaired with free skin grafting in 5 cases. The 60 perforating branches of medial sural artery were found before operation and 58 during operation in 30 patients. Among them, pre- and intra-operative perforations were consistent with 56. The sensitivity was 93.3% and positive predictive value was 96.6%. The intramuscular position and route of the main blood vessels were basically consistent with the pre- and intra-operative observation. All flaps survived and wounds healed by first intention. All incisions at the donor sites healed by first intention, and all skin grafts survived. All patients were follow up 9-24 months (mean, 14.7 months). The appearance, color, and texture of the flaps were good, and no obvious effect on wearing shoes and walking. At last follow-up, the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hind score ranged from 80 to 92, with an average of 87.5. The patient satisfaction was excellent in 29 cases and good in 1 case. The three-dimensional ultrasound technique guided by the wide band linear matrix array volume transducer probe can accurately locate the perforating branch of the medial sural artery, and the three-dimensional imaging is more intuitive, which can be used to guide the design and incision of the medial sural artery perforator flap.

Donor site scar preference in head and neck free flap reconstruction: The patient point of view

BackgroundSeveral free flaps are nowadays available for functional reconstruction after hemi-glossectomy in head and neck oncologic surgery. Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) and anterolateral thigh (ALT) have been played a workhorse role until recent years, when other valuable options such as Medial Sural Artery Perforator (MSAP) flap and Profunda Artery Perforator (PAP) flap demonstrated to be suitable contenders and are increasingly taken into account. This study aims to investigate the preference of the donor site in the light of esthetical and functional outcomes. MethodsThe participants attended a one-to-one interview with a surgeon explaining a standardized head and neck oncological procedure requiring a soft tissue reconstruction. The donor site preference in terms of esthetical, functional and overall outcomes among these four flap options was investigated. ResultsUnivariable and multivariable analysis were performed comparing the donor site preference between the two most widespread free flap RFFF vs ALT. Subsequently, the analysis was performed comparing RFFF, ALT, MSAP and PAP. ConclusionsThe study illustrated that a diverse group of patients exhibits similarly diverse preferences and expectations. As we observe a shift in the age distribution of patients with OSCC from the fifth-sixth decade towards the two extremes, and an increased incidence in the female population, it becomes essential to enhance reconstructive options provided to patients. This ensures that, while maintaining an equivalent functional outcome, we maximize patient satisfaction to the fullest extent possible.

Utilizing the Subunit Concept to Achieve Better Outcomes in Lower Limb Reconstruction: A Clinical Experience in an Asian Population.

The goals of reconstruction have progressed from filling a defect to enhancing function and aesthetic appearance. We aimed to achieve better aesthetic and functional outcomes in terms of shoe fitting and mobility. This is accomplished via a classification of the subunits and aesthetic considerations of the lower limb. Between April 2017 and December 2021, 66 cases of lower extremity free fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction cases were included in this retrospective study. Data parameters include age, sex, comorbidities, etiology of lower limb wounds, choice of free flap reconstruction, recipient arterial vessels, complications of flap reconstruction, and need for secondary debulking procedures. Physiotherapy records were also examined to determine the time to independent ambulation. In total, 66 subjects were identified. The mean age was 48.6. An estimated 74.2% (n = 49) were men, 50% (n = 33) had diabetes, and 16.6% (n = 11) had peripheral vascular disease. Of the total wounds, 65.1% (n = 43) were caused by infection, whereas the remaining 34.9% (n = 23) were due to trauma. Of the cases, 72.7% (n = 48) had free anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction, 25.8% (n = 17) were reconstructed with superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flaps, and 1.5% (n = 1) was reconstructed with medial sural artery perforator flaps. Cases that required secondary debulking procedures comprised 7.6% (n = 5). Free fasciocutaneous flaps are useful in lower extremity reconstruction. Based on the subunit principle and aesthetic considerations for lower limb reconstruction, it can aid in optimizing functional rehabilitation and decreasing secondary procedures.

A Cadaveric Study on Perforator Anatomy of the Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap.

Background The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap was described by Cavadas et al in 2001. The aim of this study was to analyze the flap characteristics in the regional population and was planned as a cadaveric dissection study. Methods Thirty-three legs of fresh cadavers were studied for perforator characteristics, length, and origin of pedicle and skin paddle thickness. Observations were documented and analyzed. Results Seventeen right legs (51.5%) and sixteen left legs (48.5%) were studied. Twenty-five pedicles originated from popliteal artery (86.2%) and four (13.8%) from the common sural trunk. No perforators were seen in four legs. The mean number of perforators is 2 (0-6). The mean distance of perforator from midpoint of popliteal fossa was 10.7 cm (8-13 cm) and from posterior midline it was 3.2 cm. The mean size of the perforator was 1.1 ± 0.8 mm (0.8-1.5 mm). The mean pedicle length was 9.3 ± 1.3 cm. The mean flap thickness was 4.3 ± 0.7 mm (3.0-5.5 mm). There was no correlation for flap or perforator characteristics with side of leg. Conclusion This study concludes that MSAP is a good flap in terms of perforator characteristics, pedicle length, and flap thickness, when a medium sized thin flap with long pedicle is needed. The location of perforator on calf varies in different population. Being a perforator flap, anatomical variability is common and should be thought of while choosing this flap.

Management of breast cancer—related lymphedema using free medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap: a VLVT approach

Management of breast cancer—related lymphedema using free medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap: a VLVT approach

Application of Staged Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Flap Surgery for Infection Control After Patellar Internal Fixation Surgery.

The anatomic position of the patella is superficial, making it vulnerable to injuries. Treatment of patella infection after internal fixation surgery remains a big challenge due to minimal soft tissue coverage and vital tissue exposure. Forty-two patients aged 10 to 59 years were admitted to the institution's burn unit between January 2010 and December 2019. Each presented with infection after patellar fracture surgery. Twenty-seven infections were superficial, whereas 15 were deep with pyogenous arthritis of the knee. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was applied after radical debridement to remove necrotic subcutaneous tissues and internal fixation devices. In addition, cases with septic arthritis were irrigated continuously with normal saline. After 5 to 10 days of NPWT treatment and irrigation, wound infection was well controlled. Afterward, 42 wounds were resurfaced with pedicled flaps, the 42 patients received 17 reverse-flow anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap, 12 medial sural artery perforator flaps, 7 gastrocnemius musculocutaneous flaps, as well as 6 saphenous artery flaps. Thirty-seven flaps survived uneventfully. However, 3 flaps developed venous congestion in the distal end. Two flaps developed tip necrosis. All patients were followed up between 3 and 48 months. Infection beneath the flap occurred in 3 patients and healed after an additional debridement surgery. The staged NPWT and flap surgery strategy focus on thorough debridement and immediate internal fixation devices removal, effective fracture fixation, efficient NPWT application, targeted administration of antibiotics, and adequate soft tissue coverage. This study established that the procedure was effective in infection control after patellar internal fixation surgery.

The medial sural artery perforator flap: translation from anatomic study to clinical application for lower extremity reconstruction

The medial sural artery perforator flap: translation from anatomic study to clinical application for lower extremity reconstruction

Reconstruction of Upper and Lower Limb Defects with Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flaps: Is Aesthetics Worth the Effort? A Retrospective Analysis

Abstract Background One of the most essential goals in managing complex limb defects is obtaining adequate soft tissue coverage with excellent functional and aesthetic outcomes. Free perforator skin flaps represent an optimal option for such defects. Therefore, our intention was to reconstruct these kinds of defects with thin fasciocutaneous flaps without the need for debulking. Herein, we define the legitimate use of the medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flaps for small-moderate size defect coverage of the hand and foot. Patients and Methods Seven patients received MSAP flaps for reconstruction of different hand and foot defects, of which the majority were males (4/7). Age, sex, flap size, location, number of perforators, recipient vessel, type of anastomosis, technique of donor site closure, and postoperative morbidity were recorded. Patients' age ranged from 48 to 84 years. Results Single-stage debridement followed by reconstruction was performed. Flap sizes ranged from 6 to 18 cm in length and 4 to 10 cm in width. The pedicles of 6 flaps were anastomosed to the tibial artery system (three posterior tibial artery, three dorsalis pedis artery) and one to the ulnar artery. Conclusion MSAP flap can be a versatile option for single-stage reconstruction of small-moderate size defects of the extremities, where thin, soft tissue envelope is required. This flap has lower donor site morbidity, more tedious elevation process, and has a good reconstructive and aesthetic result without the need for debulking in the future.

A 10-year experience in microsurgical reconstruction of the nose with a lower extremity flap

BackgroundTraditionally, radial forearm free flaps are utilized for nasal lining reconstruction when local flaps cannot provide adequate coverage. However, according to our clinical observation, the skin of the forearm flap is relatively thin and prone to collapse. We present a series of nasal reconstructions using free flaps harvested from the lower extremities to determine if the thick flap could provide more support and decrease the tendency of airway collapse. MethodsFrom March 2011 to July 2021, we identified 15 patients who underwent total or subtotal nasal reconstruction with free flap from the lower extremities (10 anterolateral thigh flap, 4 medial sural artery perforator flap, and 1 profunda artery perforator flap). We included 15 patients who underwent free forearm flap reconstruction as controls. The Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE) score was utilized to subjectively evaluate the degree of nasal obstruction symptoms. ResultsThe lower extremity group had a lower NOSE score than the forearm group (25.4 vs. 40). It took more time (6.5 vs. 4.2 months) and more surgeries (4.6 vs. 2.6) from the first free flap reconstruction till forehead flap reconstruction in the lower extremity group than in the forearm group, although the total number of surgeries was comparable between the 2 groups (7.2 vs. 8.1). ConclusionsUtilizing free flaps from the lower extremities in total or subtotal reconstruction of the nasal lining may decrease the tendency of flap collapse and alleviate airway obstruction symptoms and may also allow reconstruction of surrounding defects simultaneously compared with using forearm flaps.

Color Match following Free Flap Surgery in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Colorimetric and Aesthetic Analysis.

Many options for free tissue transfer have been described for head and neck reconstruction. Although functional outcomes remain paramount, aesthetic considerations such as color match can be equally consequential for patient quality of life. It is important to understand differences in color match based on flap donor site for head and neck reconstruction. A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with free tissue transfer at a tertiary care academic medical center between November of 2012 and November of 2020. Patients with documented photographs of their reconstruction and external skin paddles were considered. Patient demographics and surgery-specific factors were recorded. Objective differences in color match were obtained by calculating the International Commission on Illumination Delta E 2000 (dE2000) score. Standard univariate descriptive statistics and multivariable statistical analyses were performed. Lateral arm, parascapular, and medial sural artery perforator free tissue transfer performed favorably compared with other donor sites, whereas anterolateral thigh flaps had the highest average dE2000 scores. Differences in dE2000 scores were mitigated by postoperative irradiation of the flap site and with increasing time beyond 6 months postoperatively. The authors provide an objective assessment of external skin color match in patients undergoing free tissue transfer for head and neck cancer by donor site. Medial sural artery perforator, lateral arm, and parascapular free flaps performed well compared with traditional donor sites. These differences are more significant at the face and mandible when compared with the neck, but they diminish 6 months after surgery and with postoperative irradiation of the free flap skin paddle. Therapeutic, III.

The Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap versus Other Free Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap is a versatile fasciocutaneous flap, and yet is less commonly utilized than other free flaps in microvascular reconstructions of the head and neck. The aim is to conduct a high-quality Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA)- and Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2)-compliant systematic review comparing the use of the MSAP flap to other microvascular free flaps in the head and neck. Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify all original comparative studies comparing patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction with an MSAP flap to the radial forearm free flap (RFFF) or anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap from inception to February 2021. Outcome studied were the recipient-site and donor-site morbidities as well as speech and swallow function. A total of 473 articles were identified from title and abstract review. Four studies met the inclusion criteria. Compared with the RFFF and the ALT flaps, the MSAP flap had more recipient-site complications (6.0 vs 10.4%) but less donor-site complications (20.2 vs 7.8%). The MSAP flap demonstrated better overall donor-site appearance and function than the RFFF and ALT flaps ( p = 0.0006) but no statistical difference in speech and swallowing function following reconstruction ( p = 0.28). Although higher quality studies reviewing the use of the MSAP flap to other free flaps are needed, the MSAP flap provides a viable and effective reconstructive option and should be strongly considered for reconstruction of head and neck defects.

The free chimeric medial sural artery perforator flap for individualised and three-dimensional reconstruction of complex soft-tissue defects in extremities.

Trauma or lesion resection often causes complex wounds with deep soft tissue defects in extremities. Simply covering with a skin flap will leave a deep dead space resulting in infection, non-healing wounds, and poor long-term outcomes. Thus, effectively reconstructing complex wounds with dead space leaves a clinical challenge. This manuscript presents our experience using chimeric medial sural artery perforator (cMSAP) flap, to reconstruct complex soft tissue defects of the extremities, thereby exploring broader analysis and indications for future reference. Between March 2016 and May 11, 2022, patients (8 males and 3 females) with a mean age of 41 years (range from 26 to 55 years) underwent reconstructive surgery with the cMSAP flap. The cMSAP flap consists of an MSAP skin paddle and a medial sural muscle paddle. The size of the MSAP skin paddle ranged between 9 × 5cm and 20 × 6cm, and the size of the medial sural muscle paddle ranged between 2 × 2cm and 14 × 4cm. Primary closure of the donor site was achieved in all cases. Of the 11 patients, the cMSAP flap survived in 10 cases. The vascular compromise occurred in one special case and was treated with surgical procedures. The mean follow-up duration was 16.5months (range of 5-25 months). Most patients present satisfactory cosmetic and functional results. The free cMSAP flap is a good option for reconstructing complex soft tissue defects with deep dead space in extremities. The skin flap can cover the skin defect, and the muscle flap can fill the dead space against infection. In addition, three types of cMSAP flaps can be used in a broader range of complex wounds. This procedure can achieve an individualised and three-dimensional reconstruction of the defects and minimise the donor site morbidities.

Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap: A Middle Ground Between Anterolateral Thigh and Radial Forearm Flaps.

The medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flap has gained popularity in head and neck reconstruction primarily as a less morbid alternative to the radial forearm free flap (RFFF). However, no direct comparison of thickness exists among the MSAP, RFFF, and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps, which together represent the commonly utilized nonosseus-free flaps in head and neck reconstruction. Thus, this study aimed to compare these flap sites and identify predictors of thickness that will aid in reconstructive surgical planning. Cross-sectional study. Tertiary referral hospital. The thickness of skin and subcutaneous tissue at the RFFF, MSAP, and ALT donor sites were measured in 54 adult patients using Doppler ultrasound. General linear models were generated to identify predictors of flap thickness. The mean thickness of the RFFF, MSAP, and ALT flaps was 3.8 ± 2.2 mm, 7.4 ± 3.8 mm, and 9.6 ± 4.7 mm. Body mass index (BMI) was the only statistically significant contributing factor (p < .0001, coefficient: 0.15) for the RFFF. MSAP was affected by age (p = .006, coefficient = 0.06), female gender (p < .0001, coefficient = 3.2), and BMI (p < .001, coefficient = 0.25), while the ALT was affected by female gender (p = .0005, coefficient = 3.3) and BMI (p < .0001, coefficient = 0.35). Thus, the ratio of increase for flap thickness with respect to BMI is 3:5:7 for the RFFF, MSAP, and ALT flaps, respectively. The MSAP is about twice the thickness of the RFFF and 2 mm thinner than the ALT; however, 22% of patients had thicker MSAP than ALT flaps. As the strongest predictors of flap thickness, female gender, and BMI may be taken into consideration during surgical planning for reconstruction.

Comparison of the free thinned anterolateral thigh perforator flap and the free medial sural artery perforator flap for reconstructing head, neck and extremity defects

BACKGROUNDThe free anterolateral thigh (ALTP) and free medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flaps are time tested donor for head and neck, and extremities defect reconstruction. Proponents of either flap have concluded each as workhorse flap in their large cohort studies. However, we could not find any literature comparing the donor morbidities, or recipient site outcomes of these flaps, objectively.METHODSRetrospective data, such as demographic details, flap characteristics and post operative course, from patients who underwent free thinned ALTP (25 patients) and MSAP flap (20 patients) were included. At follow-up, donor site morbidity and recipient site outcomes were assessed, using previously defined protocols. These were compared in-between the two groups. RESULTSFree thinned ALTP (tALTP) flap had significantly more pedicle length and vessel diameter and harvest time than free MSAP flap (p value&lt;.00). The differences in incidence of hyperpigmentation, itching, hypertrophic scar, numbness, sensory impairment and cold intolerance at the donor site in-between the two groups, were not significant statistically. Scar at free MSAP donor site was considered a significant social stigma (p value=.005). Recipient site cosmetic outcome was comparable (p value=.86), measured using aesthetic numeric analogue.CONCLUSIONSThe free tALTP flap is superior to free MSAP flap in terms of pedicle length, vessel diameter, donor site morbidity, while the latter takes lesser time for harvest.

The Free Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap (MSAPF): An Indispensable Tool for Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Modern head and neck surgery is characterized by its emphasis on three important objectives of reconstructive and rehabilitative procedures-cosmesis, function and coverage of vital structures. Reconstruction with free flaps is a necessity when the defects become too large for more simple reconstruction options such as skin grafting and local flaps. The medial sural artery perforator flap (MSAPF) is a thin flap with a long pedicle. It has tremendous potential for applications in small-to-moderate soft tissue defects. Furthermore, chimeric MSAPF includes a skin paddle and a separated piece of medial gastrocnemius muscle, allows more freedom for flap insetting especially in 3-D reconstruction. The aim was to study the assessment of feasibility of MSAPF for head and neck reconstruction. Prospective case study from January 2019 to December 2019 was carried out in oral cancer patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue, buccal mucosa and floor of the mouth which was reconstructed using MSAPF after oncologic resection. We reconstructed 20 patients using MSAPF. It was designed according to the size and site of the defect. Donor site was primarily closed in all cases. Great results were obtained. Out of 20 MSAP, 19 flaps survived. Flap failed in one case due to venous thrombosis. The thickness of the flap ranged from 4-9 mm, pedicle length ranged from 8-13mm, number of perforators ranged from 1-2, arterial diameter ranged from 1.5-2 mm and venous diameter ranged from 1-3mm. MSAPF is a good alternative for head and neck reconstruction with the advantages of thin and pliable skin, a long and reliable vascular pedicle, straightforward intramuscular dissection, the possibility of chimeric flap design and minimal donor site morbidity.

Alternate Soft-Tissue Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction: The Next Generation of Workhorse Flaps.

There is little debate regarding the workhorse flaps for soft-tissue defects in head and neck reconstruction. However, in certain circumstances, the workhorse flaps are not available or suitable, and an alternate flap is needed. The author performed a retrospective review of a single-surgeon experience with alternate soft-tissue flaps performed over a 10-year period. Overall, 156 alternate soft-tissue free flaps were performed in 155 patients. The distribution of free flaps was 60 ulnar artery perforator (UAP), 28 lateral arm perforator (LAP), 33 medial sural artery perforator (MSAP), and 35 profunda artery perforator (PAP) flaps, with one patient receiving two PAP flaps. Defects included glossectomy, facial defects following parotidectomy or resection of cutaneous malignancies, and other intraoral defects. Eleven patients had donor-site complications: two patients with UAP flap with partial skin graft loss, two patients with delayed wound healing in the MSAP donor-site group and one who developed compartment syndrome with primary closure of the MSAP donor site, one patient with a radial nerve palsy following an LAP flap, and six patients with delayed wound healing in the PAP donor site, which healed secondarily with conservative management. There was one total flap loss each of an LAP and MSAP flap. Reconstructive microsurgeons performing high-volume head and neck reconstruction may need to incorporate alternate donor sites into their armamentarium when the primary workhorse flaps are not suitable or available. Therapeutic, IV.

Role of perforator flaps in leg and foot reconstruction.

Lower extremity wounds have always been achallenge for the reconstructive surgeons. Free perforator flaps are considered to be the best option for this problem but require the complexity of microsurgery. So, pedicled perforator flaps have emerged as an alternative option. Prospective study was conducted in 40 patients with traumatic soft tissue defects in the leg and foot. The free flaps included the anterolateral thigh flap (ALT) and medial sural artery perforator flap (MSAP). In pedicled perforator flaps group, 10 cases were designed as propeller flaps while the other 10 flaps were designed as perforator plus flaps. Free flaps were mainly used for large-sized defects; we had one case of partial flap loss and one case of complete flap necrosis. MSAP flap was the first option for coverage of large-sized defects on foot and ankle as it is athin and pliable flap, while ALT flap was used for coverage of larger defects on the leg. Pedicled perforator flaps were used mainly for small to medium-sized defects, especially in the lower third of the leg; we had three cases of flap loss in propeller flap design while we had no cases of flap loss in perforator plus flap. Perforator flaps have become areasonable solution for soft tissue defects of the lower extremity. Careful assessment of the dimensions, location, patient comorbidities, availability of surrounding soft tissue and presence of adequate perforators are mandatory for proper perforator flap selection.

Evaluation of the Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap for Validity Around Knee Reconstruction

Evaluation of the Medial Sural Artery Perforator Flap for Validity Around Knee Reconstruction

Muscle-only versus chimeric musculocutaneous gastrocnemius pedicled flap in complex orthoplastic reconstructions of the knee region: A retrospective study

The knee region represents a challenging area of soft tissue reconstruction. Specifically, in the context of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or following high-energy trauma with fractures and hardware fixation, soft tissue defects can expose critical structures such as joint, bone or tendon, besides the implant/plates themselves, with dramatic consequences in terms of postoperative infection and hardware contamination. A retrospective study was conducted on a prospectively maintained database from January 2016 to February 2021. Inclusion criteria involved all patients who underwent an implant-associated infection of the knee and upper third of the leg coupled with a soft tissue reconstruction (STR) using the traditional gastrocnemius muscle (GM) pedicled flap or the chimeric GM-MSAP (medial sural artery perforator) flap. Thirty-eight patients were included (group A, GM flap, 22 patients; group B, chimeric GM-MSAP flap, 16 patients). No statistically significant differences were detected in terms of age, comorbidities, defect size, follow-up, and flap complications. A statistically significant difference was seen among the groups in terms of successful flap re-raise (required because of a persistent infection of the implant or in a two-stage procedure setting, including the use of a cemented spacer) in favour of the GM-MSAP group. The chimeric GM-MSAP, being safer to reraise if required, can be a significantly more powerful tool in those cases in which a two-stage procedure is planned or when there is a high probability for secondary intervention need, reducing the need to convert to either free flap coverage or amputation.