Purpose: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered the gold-standard surgical treatment for those suffering from end-stage osteoarthritis as it generally produces a functional and stable joint. Soft tissue balancing is recognized as an essential aspect of the procedure, serving to optimize stability and joint kinematics beyond what can be accomplished through implant design and bone cuts alone. The extent of soft tissue balancing completed intraoperatively, whether conservative or extensive, varies between patients. The dissections used depend primarily on the patient's preoperative knee condition and the surgeon's preferred technique. Although intraoperative studies have shown soft tissue balancing accurately produces a mechanically balanced knee, little is known of the postoperative kinematic implications. The aim of this study was to determine if postoperative kinematic differences exist between patients who received varying levels of soft tissue balancing. Methods: Ten patients underwent weight-bearing radiostereometric analysis (RSA) imaging at least one-year post-operation. All patients had received a primary single radius, posterior-stabilized TKA. RSA images were taken in 20° increments of flexion starting at 0°, proceeding to their maximum attainable flexion angle of 100-120°. Model-based RSA software was used to collect kinematic measures of contact location, condylar liftoff, and magnitude of excursion on each condyle. Patients were divided into three groups according to the extent of soft tissue balancing completed intraoperatively. The mild group (n = 3) received mid-coronal plane and osteophyte corrections. The moderate group (n = 3) received deep MCL, posterior capsule, and/or semimembranosus/posterior oblique ligament corrections. The severe group (n = 4) received tibial reduction osteotomy, superficial MCL, and/or medial epicondyle osteotomy corrections. Interim data is presented. Results: Medial condyle anterior-posterior (AP) excursion ranged from 3.2 – 9.3 mm in the mild group, 3.6 – 4.6 mm in the moderate group, and 2.8 – 5.6 mm in the severe group. Lateral condyle AP excursion ranged from 5.6 – 13.1 mm in the mild group, 4.4 – 5.1 mm in the moderate group, and 2.9 – 9.9 mm in the severe group. Condylar liftoff was not seen in patients from the mild or moderate groups, but one patient in the severe group did experience condylar liftoff. Patient demographics between groups were similar. Conclusions: We hypothesized that as the extent of soft tissue balancing is increased, patients would correspondingly experience increases in condylar liftoff and AP excursion because of surgically increased laxity of their stabilizing structures. This would translate to greater risk of implant wear and loosening. However, our interim data was unable to demonstrate the AP excursion aspect of our hypothesis. AP excursion in the mild group was driven largely by a single patient's data. The only patient so far to experience condylar liftoff was in the severe group, which aligns with our expectations of increased instability when extensive soft tissue balancing is completed. Once we reach our expected sample of 12 patients per group we hope to have a better understanding of the postoperative kinematic implications of varying levels of soft tissue balancing.
Read full abstract