MED-EL Cochlear Implant Research Articles

Loudness Balancing Optimization for Better Speech Intelligibility, Music Perception, and Spectral Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

The behaviorally based programming with loudness balancing (LB) would result in better speech understanding, spectral-temporal resolution, and music perception scores, and there would be a relationship between these scores. Loudness imbalances at upper stimulation levels may cause sounds to be perceived as irregular, gravelly, or overly echoed and may negatively affect the listening performance of the cochlear implant (CI) user. LB should be performed after fitting to overcome these problems. The study included 26 unilateral Med-EL CI users. Two different CI programs based on the objective electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (P1) and the behaviorally program with LB (P2) were recorded for each participant. The Turkish Matrix Sentence Test (TMS) was applied to evaluate speech perception; the Random Gap Detection Test (RGDT) and Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test (SMRT) were applied to evaluate spectral temporal resolution skills; the Mini Profile of Music Perception Skills (mini-PROMS) and Melodic Contour Identification (MCI) tests were applied to evaluate music perception, and the results were compared. Significantly better scores were obtained with P2 in TMS tests performed in noise and quiet. SMRT scores were significantly correlated with TMS in quiet and noise, and mini-PROMS sound perception results. Although better scores were obtained with P2 in the mini-PROMS total score and MCI, a significant difference was found only for MCI. The data from the current study showed that equalization of loudness across CI electrodes leads to better perceptual acuity. It also revealed the relationship between speech perception, spectral-temporal resolution, and music perception.

Perception of Specific Musical Attributes in Dependence of the Insertion Depth of Cochlear Implant Electrodes Using the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia.

The insertion angle of the electrode array has an influence on the perception of different musical features. A deeper insertion of the electrodes is associated with a greater coverage of the cochlea with possible stimulus locations. This could lead to an improved or extended perception of pitches and pitch changes as well as to a better perception of contours in musical pieces. A Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia test battery was conducted with a collective of 19 cochlear implant (CI) users and 9 normal-hearing subjects. For the CI users, the insertion angles of the intracochlear electrode arrays were calculated using Otoplan software. Compared with normal-hearing users, CI users performed worse in the detection of melodic features of music. CI users performed better with temporal features than with melodic features. An influence of the insertion depth of the electrodes on the results of the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia could be proven neither for Cochlear nor for MED-EL CI users. Deeper insertion of electrode arrays may only better approximate the spatial-frequency map. Alone, it does not have an effect on better detection and identification of pitch and tonality and, consequently, better perception of musical attributes. Anatomy-based calculation of electrode locations and matching to characteristic frequencies will be sought in subsequent studies.

Does it make any sense to fit cochlear implants according to the anatomy-based fitting? Our experience with the first series of patients

IntroductionPersonalization of treatment is a growing trend in various fields of medicine, and this includes cochlear implantation. Both the precise choice of the length and shape of the electrode array to fit a particular cochlear anatomy, as well as an individualized fitting setting have been suggested to improve hearing outcomes with a cochlear implant (CI). The aim of this study was to compare anatomy-based fitting (ABF) vs. default fitting in terms of frequency-to-place mismatch, speech discrimination, and subjective outcomes in MED-EL CI users.MethodsEight adult CI users implanted with a Synchrony ST Flex28 were enrolled prospectively. Insertion depth and tonotopic distribution of each electrode was calculated using the Otoplan software. The mismatch was calculated for each fitting strategy relative to the electrodes' tonotopic place-frequency. Speech tests and patient preference was evaluated after 9 months with ABF and 1 month after default fitting.ResultsMedian angular insertion of the most apical active electrode was 594° (interquartile range 143°). ABF showed lower mismatches than default fitting in all patients (p ≤ 0.01). Mean speech discrimination score with ABF and default fitting was 73 ± 11% and 72 ± 16%, respectively (p = 0.672). Mean speech reception threshold with ABF and default fitting was 3.6 ± 3.4 dB and 4.2 ± 5.0 dB, respectively (p = 0.401). All patients except one preferred ABF when they were asked about their preference.ConclusionABF maps have a lower frequency-to-place mismatch than default fitting maps. In spite of similar hearing outcomes most patients prefer ABF. More data are necessary to corroborate the benefit of the ABF over default fitting in speech and subjective tests.

Exponential fitting of spread of excitation response measurements in cochlear implants

BackgroundHearing performance in cochlear implant (CI) users is variable. An objective measure which can allow a prediction of this performance is desirable. Spread of neural excitation (SoE) curves are an objective measure that can be obtained using the fitting software of cochlear implants and might be able to be used as a predictor. A novel method to interpret SoE curves is presented. New MethodSpread of excitation measurements for three recording sites were fitted using two exponential functions. An asymmetric width measure was developed, defined as the distance in mm to the point, where 25% or 50% of peak normalized amplitude was reached, for each half of the SoE separately. Also, a novel population of subjects with MED-EL CIs is used. Furthermore, speech perception (speech reception threshold, SRT) was evaluated using a matrix sentence test in a multi-source noise field. ResultsSoE width was narrowest for the basal recording site and widest for the apical recording site. Fitted SoE exponential functions were most asymmetric for the apical recording site. A significant positive correlation between sentence test SRT and SoE width at the apical recording site was found. Comparison with Existing MethodsThe use of an asymmetric width measure correlated strongly and positively with speech perception for apical recording sites, unlike the symmetric width measure used in previous studies. Presumably, longer electrodes allow stimulation of a more apical part of the cochlear. At the apical part of the cochlea, dendrites from a large region of the basilar membrane map to a narrow portion on the spiral ganglion, which might explain the observed asymmetry. ConclusionsFor subjects implanted with long electrode arrays, an asymmetric width measure correlates positively with apical SoE distance. However, due to lack of a sufficient amount of data, the results are currently less conclusive and need to be consolidated in a larger cohort of subjects.

Long-term stability of electrical stapedial reflex and electrodes impedance in children with MED-EL cochlear implants

Long-term stability of electrical stapedial reflex and electrodes impedance in children with MED-EL cochlear implants

Cochlear implant mapping strategy to solve difficulty in speech recognition.

Cochlear implants (CIs) are viable treatment options in patients with severe to profound hearing loss. Speech recognition difficulties were reported in some CI recipients even with a good-aided hearing threshold. The aim of this study was to report a mapping strategy based on different target-aided hearing thresholds to achieve optimal speech recognition and maximize functional outcomes. The safety and efficacy of the mapping strategy were also inspected in the article. This prospective repeated measures study enrolled 20 adult CI recipients with postlingual deafness using the MED-EL CI system. Word and sentence discrimination assessment and administration of a questionnaire pertaining to comfort level were conducted at the end of each session. The electrophysiological features of the CI mapping were recorded. The correlation between audiometry results and word and sentence recognition was not high. CIs performed best at an audiometry threshold between 25 and 35 dB. CI performance with the best perception relies on a balance between minimizing the hearing threshold and maximizing the dynamic range while maintaining an appropriate comfort level, which was achieved when the target hearing threshold was set at 25-35 dB in this study.

MELUDIA – Online music training for cochlear implant users

Background Music enjoyment is of importance for many cochlear implant (CI) users, and the interest in music training is high. But many CI users report that it is a challenge to find suitable training resources and that they stall because they don’t know how to practice. Meludia is an online music training program that provides structured and guided music training for musically experienced and inexperienced children and adults. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the suitability of the Meludia music training software for CI recipients based on two research questions: (1) are the easiest exercises available easy enough for CI users, and (2) are there any gaps when progressing through levels and stars with increasing difficulty? Methods Thirty-eight adult MED-EL CI users completed fourteen exercises involving 5 different musical dimensions of the online music training program. Results Our results show that the easiest exercises available in Meludia are easy enough for CI users to be able to use this training resource independent of age, indication, duration of CI use or musical background. Conclusion With Meludia we assessed and found a suitable and comprehensive training tool that allows CI recipients to work on individual goals regardless of their present abilities.

ARTFit-A Quick and Reliable Tool for Performing Initial Fittings in Users of MED-EL Cochlear Implants.

This study assessed the safety and performance of ARTFit, a new tool embedded in MAESTRO, the cochlear implant (CI) system software by MED-EL GmbH (Innsbruck, Austria). ARTFit automatically measures thresholds of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) to produce initial ‘maps’ (ECAPMAPs), i.e., configuration settings of the audio processor that the audiologist switches to live mode and adjusts for comfortable loudness (LiveECAPMAPs). Twenty-three adult and ten pediatric users of MED-EL CIs participated. The LiveECAPMAPs were compared to behavioral maps (LiveBurstMAPs) and to the participants’ everyday clinical maps (ClinMAPs). Four evaluation measures were considered: average deviations of the maximum comfortable loudness (MCL) levels of the LiveECAPMAPs and the LiveBurstMAPs from the MCLs of the ClinMAPs; correlations between the MCLs of the LiveECAPMAPs (MCLecap) and the LiveBurstMAPs (MCLburst) with the MCLs of the ClinMAPs (MCLclin); fitting durations; and speech reception thresholds (SRTs). All evaluation measures were analyzed separately in the adult and pediatric subgroups. For all evaluation measures, the deviations of the LiveECAPMAPs from the ClinMAPs were not larger than those of the LiveBurstMAPs from the ClinMAPs. The Pearson correlation between the MCLecap and the MCLclin across all channels was r2 = 0.732 (p < 0.001) in the adult and r2 = 0.616 (p < 0.001) in the pediatric subgroups. The mean fitting duration in minutes for the LiveECAPMAPs was significantly shorter than for that of the LiveBurstMAPs in both subgroups: adults took 5.70 (range 1.90–11.98) vs. 9.27 (6.83–14.72) min; children took 3.03 (1.97–4.22) vs. 7.35 (3.95–12.77). SRTs measured with the LiveECAPMAPs were non-inferior to those measured with the ClinMAPs and not statistically different to the SRTs measured with the LiveBurstMAPs. ARTFit is a safe, quick, and reliable tool for audiologists to produce ECAP-based initial fitting maps in adults and young children who are not able to provide subjective feedback.

Electrically Evoked Auditory Late Responses as a Novel Method for Cochlear Implant Programming.

Electrically evoked auditory late responses (eALR) are useful as an objective cochlear implant (CI) fitting method. Different objective and behavioral methods are used for CI fitting. However, there is no objective method that indicates that the electrical signal reaches the auditory cortex. eALR is an indicator that electrical signals reach the auditory cortex, so our aim was to investigate the use of eALR as an objective method for CI programming. Two different programs were created for 21 unilateral Med-El CI users. In the first program, the most comfortable level (MCL) was adjusted with the electrical stapes reflex threshold (eSRT), and the threshold levels (THR) were behaviorally adjusted according to the user's feedback. In the second program, the MCL level was adjusted to a level where all the components of the eALR were clearly seen, and the user did not feel uncomfortable; the THR levels were adjusted to the lowest level where the eALR P1 wave could be seen. The results of the MCL and THR levels of the two programs and the free field tests conducted with both programs were compared. While MCL levels did not differ significantly between the two programs, a significant difference was observed between THR levels. In addition, no significant difference was found between hearing and speech tests with CI in the free field. The results revealed no significant performance difference between the two programs and that eALR could be preferred as an objective method for MCL determination.

Cochlear Implant Compression Optimization for Musical Sound Quality in MED-EL Users.

Variations in loudness are a fundamental component of the music listening experience. Cochlear implant (CI) processing, including amplitude compression, and a degraded auditory system may further degrade these loudness cues and decrease the enjoyment of music listening. This study aimed to identify optimal CI sound processor compression settings to improve music sound quality for CI users. Fourteen adult MED-EL CI recipients participated (Experiment No. 1: n = 17 ears; Experiment No. 2: n = 11 ears) in the study. A software application using a modified comparison category rating (CCR) test method allowed participants to compare and rate the sound quality of various CI compression settings while listening to 25 real-world music clips. The two compression settings studied were (1) Maplaw, which informs audibility and compression of soft level sounds, and (2) automatic gain control (AGC), which applies compression to loud sounds. For each experiment, one compression setting (Maplaw or AGC) was held at the default, while the other was varied according to the values available in the clinical CI programming software. Experiment No. 1 compared Maplaw settings of 500, 1000 (default), and 2000. Experiment No. 2 compared AGC settings of 2.5:1, 3:1 (default), and 3.5:1. In Experiment No. 1, the group preferred a higher Maplaw setting of 2000 over the default Maplaw setting of 1000 (p = 0.003) for music listening. There was no significant difference in music sound quality between the Maplaw setting of 500 and the default setting (p = 0.278). In Experiment No. 2, a main effect of AGC setting was found; however, no significant difference in sound quality ratings for pairwise comparisons were found between the experimental settings and the default setting (2.5:1 versus 3:1 at p = 0.546; 3.5:1 versus 3:1 at p = 0.059). CI users reported improvements in music sound quality with higher than default Maplaw or AGC settings. Thus, participants preferred slightly higher compression for music listening, with results having clinical implications for improving music perception in CI users.

Pure tone discrimination with cochlear implants and filter-band spread

For many cochlear implant (CI) users, frequency discrimination is still challenging. We studied the effect of frequency differences relative to the electrode frequency bands on pure tone discrimination. A single-center, prospective, controlled, psychoacoustic exploratory study was conducted in a tertiary university referral center. Thirty-four patients with Cochlear Ltd. and MED-EL CIs and 19 age-matched normal-hearing control subjects were included. Two sinusoidal tones were presented with varying frequency differences. The reference tone frequency was chosen according to the center frequency of basal or apical electrodes. Discrimination abilities were psychophysically measured in a three-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice procedure (3I-2AFC) for various CI electrodes. Hit rates were measured, particularly with respect to discrimination abilities at the corner frequency of the electrode frequency-bands. The mean rate of correct decision concerning pitch difference was about 60% for CI users and about 90% for the normal-hearing control group. In CI users, the difference limen was two semitones, while normal-hearing participants detected the difference of one semitone. No influence of the corner frequency of the CI electrodes was found. In CI users, pure tone discrimination seems to be independent of tone positions relative to the corner frequency of the electrode frequency-band. Differences of 2 semitones can be distinguished within one electrode.

Comparative Analysis of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users.

The primary goal of the study was to investigate electrical cortical auditory evoked potentials (eCAEPs) at maximum comfortable level (MCL) and 50% MCL on three cochlear implant (CI) electrodes and compare them with the acoustic CAEP (aCAEPs), in terms of the amplitude and latency of the P1-N1-P2 complex. This was achieved by comparing the eCAEP obtained with the method described and stimulating single electrodes, via the fitting software spanning the cochlear array and the aCAEP obtained using the HEARLab system at four speech tokens. Twenty MED-EL (MED-EL Medical Electronics, Innsbruck, Austria) CI adult users were tested. CAEP recording with HEARLab System was performed with speech tokens /m/, /g/, /t/, and /s/ in free field, presented at 55 dB SPL. eCAEPs were recorded with an Evoked Potential device triggered from the MAX Programming Interface (MED-EL Medical Devices) with 70 msec electrical burst at 0.9 Hz at the apical (1), middle (6), and basal (10 or 11) CI electrode at their MCL and 50% MCL. CAEP responses were recorded in 100% of the test subjects for the speech token /t/, 95% for the speech tokens /g/ and /s/, and 90% for the speech token /m/. For eCAEP recordings, in all subjects, it was possible to identify N1 and P2 peaks when stimulating the apical and middle electrodes. This incidence of detection decreased to an 85% chance of stimulation at 50% MCL on the same electrodes. A P1 peak was less evident for all electrodes. There was an overall increase in latency for stimulation at 50% MCL compared with MCL. There was a significant difference in the amplitude of adjacent peaks (P1-N1 and N1-P2) for 50% MCL compared with MCL. The mean of the maximum cross-correlation values were in the range of 0.63 to 0.68 for the four speech tokens. The distribution of the calculated time shift, where the maximum of the cross-correlation was found, was distributed between the speech tokens. The speech token /g/ had the highest number of valid cross-correlations, while the speech token /s/ had the lowest number. This study successfully compared aCAEP and eCAEP in CI users. Both acoustic and electrical P1-N1-P2 recordings obtained were clear and reliable, with good correlation. Latency increased with decreasing stimulation level, while amplitude decreased. eCAEP is potentially a better option to verify speech detection at the cortical level because it (1) uses direct stimulation and therefore creates less interference and delay of the sound processor and (2) creates more flexibility with the recording setup and stimulation setting. As such, eCAEP is an alternative method for CI optimization.

Feasibility of TMS in patients with new generation cochlear implants

ObjectiveThe presence of a cochlear implant is being considered an absolute contraindication for experiments and/or treatments. We aimed to verify TMS (Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) compatibility of a new generation of cochlear implants. MethodsIn a series of experiments, we test if MED-EL cochlear implants -compatible with stable fields of magnetic resonance imaging scanning- are fully resistant even to rapidly varying magnetic fields as those generated by single pulses and low and high-frequency trains of repetitive TMS (rTMS) applied with a figure of eight coil and different magnetic stimulators. ResultsWith a TMS intensity equal or below 2.2 Tesla (T) the cochlear implant and all its electronic components remain fully functional, even when the combination of frequency, intensity and number of pulses exceeds the currently available safety guidelines. Induced forces on the implant are negligible. With higher magnetic fields (i.e., 3.2 T), one device was corrupted. ConclusionsResults exclude the risk of electronic damaging, demagnetizing or displacements of the studied cochlear implants when exposed to magnetic fields of up to 2.2 T delivered through a focal coil. SignificanceThey open the way to use focal rTMS protocols with the aim of promoting neural plasticity in auditory networks, possibly helping the post-implant recovery of speech perception performance.

Sound Localization Bias and Error in Bimodal Listeners Improve Instantaneously When the Device Delay Mismatch Is Reduced.

Users of a cochlear implant (CI) in one ear, who are provided with a hearing aid (HA) in the contralateral ear, so-called bimodal listeners, are typically affected by a constant and relatively large interaural time delay offset due to differences in signal processing and differences in stimulation. For HA stimulation, the cochlear travelling wave delay is added to the processing delay, while for CI stimulation, the auditory nerve fibers are stimulated directly. In case of MED-EL CI systems in combination with different HA types, the CI stimulation precedes the acoustic HA stimulation by 3 to 10 ms. A self-designed, battery-powered, portable, and programmable delay line was applied to the CI to reduce the device delay mismatch in nine bimodal listeners. We used an A-B-B-A test design and determined if sound source localization improves when the device delay mismatch is reduced by delaying the CI stimulation by the HA processing delay (τHA). Results revealed that every subject in our group of nine bimodal listeners benefited from the approach. The root-mean-square error of sound localization improved significantly from 52.6° to 37.9°. The signed bias also improved significantly from 25.2° to 10.5°, with positive values indicating a bias toward the CI. Furthermore, two other delay values (τHA –1 ms and τHA +1 ms) were applied, and with the latter value, the signed bias was further reduced in some test subjects. We conclude that sound source localization accuracy in bimodal listeners improves instantaneously and sustainably when the device delay mismatch is reduced.

Slope of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth function is site-dependent

Objectives In human cochlear implant (CI) recipients, the slope of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitude growth function (AGF) is not very well investigated, in comparison to the threshold derived from the AGF. This is despite the fact that it was shown in animal experiments that the slope correlates with the number of excitable neurons. The rationale of this study was to establish baseline data of the AGF slope for possible clinical applications, while investigating stability over time and dependence on cochlear site. Design ECAP AGFs of 16 ears implanted with MED-EL CIs were recorded on all electrode contacts during the normal clinical routine at 4 different points in time. Results Due to patient availability, not all 16 ears could be measured at all 4 points in time. A dependence of the slope on the electrode position was visible and statistically significant: At the three electrode contacts at the apical end of the array, the slope is greater compared to the medial and basal region of the cochlea. Conclusion The three most apical electrode contacts show greater slopes of ECAP AGF recordings. Our data of the cohort slopes show mild effects between the 4 different points in time.

Optimizing stimulation parameters to record electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials in cochlear implant users

Objectives: To measure the effect of burst duration, stimulated electrode position, and stimulation level on the P1–N1–P2 electrically evoked cortical auditory potentials (eCAEPs) elicited via the direct stimulation of selected electrode contacts on a cochlear implant (CI) electrode array. Methods: Prospective observational study of 20 adult cochlear implant users with a MED-EL CI system. eCAEPs were recorded simultaneously with the Eclipse (Interacoustics) and the Neuropack S1 MEB-9400 (Nihon Kohden) recording systems. Tone bursts with durations of 50, 100, and 150 ms were used for stimulation at the maximum comfortable loudness level (MCL) and MCL minus 50% dynamic range (DR) at selected apical, medial, and basal intracochlear electrodes. Results: Individual P1–N1 and N1–P2 amplitudes were significantly higher at the MCL level of stimulation than at the MCL minus 50% DR. Burst length and stimulated electrode position did not affect the eCAEP responses. Residual noise was lower in the Neuropack S1 MEB-9400 system. Conclusions: This study shows the feasibility of eCAEP recording using the MAESTRO software. The eCAEP morphology was independent of the burst duration and the stimulated electrode position. This allows a large flexibility in using direct cochlear stimulation to elicit eCAEPs.

Long-Term Influence of Electrode Array Length on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.

Results from a prospective trial demonstrated better speech recognition for cochlear implant (CI) recipients implanted with a long lateral wall electrode array compared to subjects with a short array after 1 year of listening experience. As short array recipients may require an extended adaptation period, this study investigated whether differences in speech recognition continued through 4 years of CI use. Long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. Subjects were randomized to receive a MED-EL medium (24 mm) or standard (31.5 mm) array. Linear mixed models compared speech recognition between cohorts with word recognition in quiet and sentence recognition in noise at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 months postactivation. Postoperative imaging and electric frequency filters were reviewed to assess the influence of frequency-to-place mismatch and angular separation between neighboring contacts, a metric associated with peripheral spectral selectivity. Long (31.5 mm) array recipients demonstrated superior speech recognition out to 4 years postactivation. There was a significant effect of angular separation between contacts, with more closely spaced contacts associated with poorer speech recognition. There was no significant effect of mismatch, yet this may have been obscured by changes in frequency filters over time. Conventional MED-EL CI recipients implanted with 31.5-mm arrays experience better speech recognition than 24-mm array recipients, initially and with long-term listening experience. The benefit conferred by longer arrays in the present cohort can be partially attributed to more widely spaced electrode contacts, presumably a result of reduced channel interaction. 2 Laryngoscope, 131:892-897, 2021.

The Second and Subsequent Sessions of the Med-El Cochlear Implant Fitting

In the previous article [1], we briefly described the procedure for the first switch on and the first session of fitting of the Med-El cochlear implant...

The reliability of hearing implants: report on the type and incidence of cochlear implant failures

Objectives: This study presents the data collected through a database on the type and incidence of cochlear implant device failures and major complications and quantifies the risk of failures across time based on the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) CI86:2017 standard. Methods: Information on reliability of MED-EL cochlear implants was collected from the MED-EL complaint database between 2003 and2013. Explants were categorized and device reliability was calculated according to the AAMI CI86:2017 standard principles. Results: Data were collected for 11662 devices (5462 children, 6200 adults). The mean duration of follow up was 46.16 months. The total failure rate for all devices and all subjects was 2.41%. Medical related explants (MRE) were significantly worse for children than for adults with the ceramic implants, C40+ (p = 0.008) and PULSAR (p = 0.020). Device failure explants (DFE) were significantly worse for children than for adults with all four devices in the study, the C40+ (p < 0.001), PULSAR (p < 0.001), SONATA (p < 0.001), and CONCERTO (p = 0.023). The mean annual failure rate for all subjects and devices was 0.63% (1.03% for children, 0.28% for adults). The mean annual failure rate was 0.90% for the C40+; 0.57% for the PULSAR; 0.46% for the SONATA; and 0.39% for the CONCERTO. Conclusions: Compared to adults, children had significantly worse MRE and DFE due to a higher risk of head trauma and more vulnerable skull anatomy. Further, the authors conclude that the AAMI standard will ensure a more comprehensive and transparent evaluation of cochlear implant reliability in the future.

Approximations to the Voice of a Cochlear Implant: Explorations With Single-Sided Deaf Listeners.

Fourteen single-sided deaf listeners fit with an MED-EL cochlear implant (CI) judged the similarity of clean signals presented to their CI and modified signals presented to their normal-hearing ear. The signals to the normal-hearing ear were created by (a) filtering, (b) spectral smearing, (c) changing overall fundamental frequency (F0), (d) F0 contour flattening, (e) changing formant frequencies, (f) altering resonances and ring times to create a metallic sound quality, (g) using a noise vocoder, or (h) using a sine vocoder. The operations could be used singly or in any combination. On a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 was a complete match to the sound of the CI, the mean match score was 8.8. Over half of the matches were 9.0 or higher. The most common alterations to a clean signal were band-pass or low-pass filtering, spectral peak smearing, and F0 contour flattening. On average, 3.4 operations were used to create a match. Upshifts in formant frequencies were implemented most often for electrode insertion angles less than approximately 500°. A relatively small set of operations can produce signals that approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI. There are large individual differences in the combination of operations needed. The sound files in Supplemental Material approximate the sound of the MED-EL CI for patients fit with 28-mm electrode arrays.