Mechanisms Of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy Research Articles

Insights into the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Focus on Oxidative Stress and Neuroinflammation.

Cancer is a high-morbidity disease prevalent worldwide. Chemotherapy is the primarily used regimen for cancer treatment; however, it also brings severe side effects. Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN) and Chemotherapy-induced Cognitive Impairment (CICI) are two main complications occurring in chemotherapy. They are both associated with nervous system injury and are therefore collectively referred to as Chemotherapy-induced Neuropathy (CIN). CIPN induces neuralgia and numbness in limbs, while CICI causes amnesia and cognitive dysfunction. Currently, there are no effective therapeutics to prevent or cure CIN, so research into new drugs to alleviate CIN becomes urgent. Oxidative stress and neuroinflammation are the common pathogenic mechanisms of CIPN and CICI. Excessive Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and pro-inflammatory cytokines cause peripheral nervous system damage and hence CIPN. Peripheral ROS and cytokines also change the permeability of the blood-brain barrier, thereby increasing oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in the central nervous system, ultimately leading to CICI. Several antidepressants have been used to treat CIN and exhibited good clinical effects. Their potential pharmacological mechanism has been reported to ameliorate oxidative stress and neuroinflammation, guiding a new feasible way for effective therapeutic development against CIN. This mini-review has summarized the latest advances in the research on CIN with respect to clinical status, pathogenesis, and treatment. It has also discussed the potential of repurposing antidepressants for CIN treatment and prospected the strategy of developing therapeutics by targeting oxidative stress and neuroinflammation against CIN.

Biological Mediators and Partial Regulatory Mechanisms on Neuropathic Pain Associated With Chemotherapeutic Agents.

One of the most common issues caused by antineoplastic agents is chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). In patients, CIPN is a sensory neuropathy accompanied by various motor and autonomic changes. With a high prevalence of cancer patients, CIPN is becoming a major problem for both cancer patients and for their health care providers. Nonetheless, there are lacking effective interventions preventing CIPN and treating the CIPN symptoms. A number of studies have demonstrated the cellular and molecular signaling pathways leading to CIPN using experimental models and the beneficial effects of some interventions on the CIPN symptoms related to those potential mechanisms. This review will summarize results obtained from recent human and animal studies, which include the abnormalities in mechanical and temperature sensory responses following chemotherapy such as representative bortezomib, oxaliplatin and paclitaxel. The underlying mechanisms of CIPN at cellular and molecular levels will be also discussed for additional in-depth studies needed to be better explored. Overall, this paper reviews the basic picture of CIPN and the signaling mechanisms of the most common antineoplastic agents in the peripheral and central nerve systems. A better understanding of the risk factors and fundamental mechanisms of CIPN is needed to develop effective preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Modeling mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and chemotherapy transport using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived sensory neurons

Backgroundand Purpose: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) constitutes a significant health problem due to the increasing prevalence and lack of therapies for treatment and prevention. While pivotal for routine cancer treatment, paclitaxel and vincristine frequently cause CIPN and impact the quality of life among cancer patients and survivors. Here, we investigate molecular mechanisms and drug transport in CIPN. Experimental approachHuman sensory neurons were derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-SNs), which were characterized using flow cytometry and immunolabeling. These iPSC-SNs were exposed to different concentrations of the two microtubule-targeting agents, paclitaxel and vincristine, with and without pre-exposure to inhibitors and inducers of efflux transporters. Neuronal networks were quantified via fluorescent staining against sensory neuron markers. Transcriptional effects of the chemotherapeutics were examined using quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR). Key resultsPaclitaxel exposure resulted in axonal retraction and thickening, while vincristine caused fragmentation and abolishment of axons. Both agents increased the mRNA expression of the pain receptor, transient receptor potential vanilloid (TRPV1), and highly induced neuronal damage, as measured by activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) mRNA. iPSC-SNs express the efflux transporters, P-glycoprotein (P-gp, encoded by ABCB1) and multidrug resistance-associated protein 1 (MPR1, encoded by ABCC1). Modulation of efflux transporters indicate that P-gp and MRP1 play a role in modulating neuronal accumulation and neurotoxicity in preliminary experiments. Conclusionand Implications: iPSC-SNs are a valuable and robust model to study the role of efflux transporters and other mechanistic targets in CIPN. Efflux transporters may play a role in CIPN pathogenesis as they regulate the disposition of chemotherapy to the peripheral nervous system, and they may present potential therapeutic targets for CIPN.

Paclitaxel-Associated Mechanical Sensitivity and Neuroinflammation Are Sex-, Time-, and Site-Specific and Prevented through Cannabigerol Administration in C57Bl/6 Mice.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most prevalent and dose-limiting complications in chemotherapy patients. One identified mechanism underlying CIPN is neuroinflammation. Most of this research has been conducted in only male or female rodent models, making direct comparisons regarding the role of sex differences in the neuroimmune underpinnings of CIPN limited. Moreover, most measurements have focused on the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and/or spinal cord, while relatively few studies have been aimed at characterizing neuroinflammation in the brain, for example the periaqueductal grey (PAG). The overall goals of the present study were to determine (1) paclitaxel-associated changes in markers of inflammation in the PAG and DRG in male and female C57Bl6 mice and (2) determine the effect of prophylactic administration of an anti-inflammatory cannabinoid, cannabigerol (CBG). In Experiment 1, male and female mice were treated with paclitaxel (8-32 mg/kg/injection, Days 1, 3, 5, and 7) and mechanical sensitivity was measured using Von Frey filaments on Day 7 (Cohort 1) and Day 14 (Cohort 2). Cohorts were euthanized on Day 8 or 15, respectively, and DRG and PAG were harvested for qPCR analysis of the gene expression of markers of pain and inflammation Aig1, Gfap, Ccl2, Cxcl9, Tlr4, Il6, and Calca. In Experiment 2, male and female mice were treated with vehicle or 10 mg/kg CBG i.p. 30 min prior to each paclitaxel injection. Mechanical sensitivity was measured on Day 14. Mice were euthanized on Day 15, and PAG were harvested for qPCR analysis of the gene expression of Aig1, Gfap, Ccl2, Cxcl9, Tlr4, Il6, and Calca. Paclitaxel produced a transient increase in potency to produce mechanical sensitivity in male versus female mice. Regarding neuroinflammation, more gene expression changes were apparent earlier in the DRG and at a later time point in the PAG. Also, more changes were observed in females in the PAG than males. Overall, sex differences were observed for most markers at both time points and regions. Importantly, in both the DRG and PAG, most increases in markers of neuroinflammation and pain occurred at paclitaxel doses higher than those associated with significant changes in the mechanical threshold. Two analytes that demonstrated the most compelling sexual dimorphism and that changed more in males were Cxcl9 and Ccl2, and Tlr4 in females. Lastly, prophylactic administration of CBG protected the male and female mice from increased mechanical sensitivity and female mice from neuroinflammation in the PAG. Future studies are warranted to explore how these sex differences may shed light on the mechanisms of CIPN and how non-psychoactive cannabinoids such as CBG may engage these targets to prevent or attenuate the effects of paclitaxel and other chemotherapeutic agents on the nervous system.

Current understanding of the molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is the most common off-target adverse effects caused by various chemotherapeutic agents, such as cisplatin, oxaliplatin, paclitaxel, vincristine and bortezomib. CIPN is characterized by a substantial loss of primary afferent sensory axonal fibers leading to sensory disturbances in patients. An estimated of 19-85% of patients developed CIPN during the course of chemotherapy. The lack of preventive measures and limited treatment options often require a dose reduction or even early termination of life-saving chemotherapy, impacting treatment efficacy and patient survival. In this Review, we summarized the current understanding on the pathogenesis of CIPN. One prominent change induced by chemotherapeutic agents involves the disruption of neuronal cytoskeletal architecture and axonal transport dynamics largely influenced by the interference of microtubule stability in peripheral neurons. Due to an ineffective blood-nerve barrier in our peripheral nervous system, exposure to some chemotherapeutic agents causes mitochondrial swelling in peripheral nerves, which lead to the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pore and cytochrome c release resulting in degeneration of primary afferent sensory fibers. The exacerbated nociceptive signaling and pain transmission in CIPN patients is often linked the increased neuronal excitability largely due to the elevated expression of various ion channels in the dorsal root ganglion neurons. Another important contributing factor of CIPN is the neuroinflammation caused by an increased infiltration of immune cells and production of inflammatory cytokines. In the central nervous system, chemotherapeutic agents also induce neuronal hyperexcitability in the spinal dorsal horn and anterior cingulate cortex leading to the development of central sensitization that causes CIPN. Emerging evidence suggests that the change in the composition and diversity of gut microbiota (dysbiosis) could have direct impact on the development and progression of CIPN. Collectively, all these aspects contribute to the pathogenesis of CIPN. Recent advances in RNA-sequencing offer solid platform for in silico drug screening which enable the identification of novel therapeutic agents or repurpose existing drugs to alleviate CIPN, holding immense promises for enhancing the quality of life for cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy and improve their overall treatment outcomes.

The Future of Chemotherapy: The Mechanisms and Benefits of Exercise in Taxane-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting side-effect resulting from numerous neurotoxic chemotherapies that damages the peripheral nerves, alters sensations in the hands and feet, causes burning and shooting pains, and impairs a patient’s quality of life (QoL). There are limited established interventions to help improve CIPN symptoms. There is only one pharmacological agent (Duloxetine) for treatment of CIPN; however, it only has mild benefit, signaling a critical need for alternative management options to manage patient symptoms. Multiple studies suggest therapeutic benefits of exercise in cancer care to improve physical and psychological functioning; however, the benefits regarding CIPN symptoms and physical function are less clear. This narrative review synthesizes research articles investigating the effect and mechanisms induced by different exercise programs for patients with taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) symptoms and function. The overall incidence, manifestations, characteristics, and mechanisms of CIPN are also discussed. While some studies in this narrative review demonstrated that exercise programs may have benefits on sensory and motor TIPN symptoms in some but not all patients, there are consistent benefits of improved QoL and physical function across most patients. This narrative review highlights the need for future research to confirm the effects of exercise for TIPN, with a focus on other important components, including the effect of exercise adherence, type, and supervision level.

Crosstalk of Mast Cells and Natural Killer Cells with Neurons in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major comorbidity of cancer. Multiple clinical interventions have been studied to effectively treat CIPN, but the results have been disappointing, with no or little efficacy. Hence, understanding the pathophysiology of CIPN is critical to improving the quality of life and clinical outcomes of cancer patients. Although various mechanisms of CIPN have been described in neuropathic anti-cancer agents, the neuroinflammatory process involving cytotoxic/proinflammatory immune cells remains underexamined. While mast cells (MCs) and natural killer (NK) cells are the key innate immune compartments implicated in the pathogenesis of peripheral neuropathy, their role in CIPN has remained under-appreciated. Moreover, the biology of proinflammatory cytokines associated with MCs and NK cells in CIPN is particularly under-evaluated. In this review, we will focus on the interactions between MCs, NK cells, and neuronal structure and their communications via proinflammatory cytokines, including TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-6, in peripheral neuropathy in association with tumor immunology. This review will help lay the foundation to investigate MCs, NK cells, and cytokines to advance future therapeutic strategies for CIPN.

Effect of Fenofibrate as PPARα Agonist in Suppressing the Development of Oxaliplatin-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy via TRPA1 Modulation

Background: CIPN (Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy) primarily affects the sensory system and is accompanied by pain, autonomic dysfunction, and motor impairments. Alterations of intracellular second messengers at the supraspinal level in CIPN needed to be explored more. In addition, there is a lack of evidence regarding implications for the supraspinal area through the propagation of pain via the ascending pathway. Objective: In this study, we evaluated the effect of fenofibrate as a PPARα agonist in suppressing the development of CIPN. Methods: Twenty-four mice were distributed to the normal control group, neuropathy group, and neuropathy with the treatment of fenofibrate 75 and 150 mg/kg groups, resulting in 6 animals per group. Oxaliplatin was injected on days 0, 2, 4, and 6. The hot plate test was performed before the oxaliplatin administration and then continued on the 7th, 14th, and 21st days. Thalamus tissues were collected to measure the TRPA1 mRNA expression using qPCR. Results: Fenofibrate 75 mg/kg co-treatment with oxaliplatin tended to prevent the enhancement of oxaliplatin-induced thermal hyperalgesia in hind-paw withdrawal and rubbing responses. Furthermore, fenofibrate 75 and 150 mg/kg co-treatment with oxaliplatin significantly reduced the relative TRPA1 mRNA expression but did not modulate the relative BDNF mRNA expression in the thalamus. Conclusion: PPARα agonist has a potential effect in suppressing the development of CIPN. However, given the various perspectives on the role of neurotrophins in CIPN, additional non-clinical investigations, are needed to provide more insight into other mechanisms of CIPN and the role of PPAR agonists.

Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain and Underlying Mechanisms

One of the most common issues caused by antineoplastic agents is chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). In patients, CIPN is a sensory neuropathy accompanied by various motor and autonomic changes. With a high prevalence of cancer patients, CIPN is becoming a major problem for both cancer patients and for their health care providers. Nonetheless, there are lacking effective interventions preventing CIPN and treating the CIPN symptoms. Several current studies have demonstrated the cellular and molecular signaling pathways leading to CIPN using experimental models and the beneficial effects of some interventions on the CIPN symptoms related to those potential mechanisms. This review summarizes results obtained from recent human and animal studies, which include the abnormalities in mechanical and temperature sensory responses following chemotherapeutic agents such as representative bortezomib, oxaliplatin and paclitaxel. The underlying mechanisms of CIPN at cellular and molecular levels are also discussed for additional in-depth studies needed to be better explored. A better understanding of the risk factors and fundamental mechanisms of CIPN is needed to design effective preventive drugs and therapeutic strategies. Overall, this paper reviews the basic picture of CIPN and the signaling mechanisms of the most common antineoplastic agents and potential approaches to be considered to alleviate neuropathic pain observed during chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and biomarkers of gut microbial translocation in long-term survivors of testicular germ cell tumors.

e17032 Background: Survivors of testicular germ cell tumors (GCT) may suffer from long-term treatment induced peripheral neuropathy. We hypothesized markers of gut microbial translocation after chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy may be contributing factors of peripheral neuropathy. Methods: GCT survivors (N = 194) from National Cancer Institute of Slovakia completed the EORTC QLQ Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN20) questionnaires during their annual follow-up visit at 10-year median (range 2-25). Biomarkers of gut microbial translocaion and dysbiosis (GMT) lipopolysaccharide (LPS), high mobility group box-1 (HMGB-1), d-lactate and sCD14 were measured from peripheral blood obtained during the same visit. Upon obtaining the scores from questionnaires per recommended guidelines, each score was correlated with biomarkers of GMT scored as as high or low (above and below median). Survivors were treated with orchiectomy only (N = 30), cisplatin-based chemotherapy (N = 135), radiotherapy to the retroperitoneum (N = 14) or both chemotherapy and radiotherapy (N = 10). Results: GCT survivors with higher vs lower plasma levels of HMGB-1 had worse overall CIPN20 score (median ± SD = 18 229.0 ± 13 644.2 vs 17 387.0 ± 5106.6 p = 0.048). Patients with higher vs lower plasma HMGB-1 also had worse motor function (9.0 ± 1.8 vs 8.0 ± 2.3, p = 0.036). Sensory and autonomy subscales of CIPN20 qestionaire did not show significant association with HMGB-1 (both P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in CIPN20 symptom burden associated with LPS, d-lactate and sCD14 (all P > 0.05). Conclusions: HMGB-1 may serve as a promising biomarker of CIPN20 in long-term cancer survivors. Proinflammatory pathways are suggested as underlying mechanism of CIPN. Furhter research and larger patient cohorts are needed to explore the pathogenesis of CIPN in GCT survivors.

Prevention and therapy of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a review of recent findings.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is one of the most frequent dose-limiting side effects, observed in patients receiving antineoplastic agents, persisting for up to two years after completing treatment, greatly affecting both the course of chemotherapy and patients' quality of life. Approximately 20 to 85% of patients treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy will develop peripheral neuropathy and there is considerable variability in its severity among patients. The main symptoms are numbness, paresthesia, and burning pain in a "glove and stocking" distribution. The prevalence of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy will likely increase as cancer survival rates continue to improve. Currently, there are only a few therapeutic options available for the prevention or successful therapy because the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy remain unclear. A better understanding of the risk factors and underlying mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is needed to develop effective preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Animal models of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy for hematological malignancies: A review.

Chemotherapy is one of the main treatments for hematologic malignancies. However, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the most common long-term toxic reactions in chemotherapy, and the occurrence of CIPN affects patients' quality of life and can cause interruption of chemotherapy in severe cases, thus reducing the efficacy of chemotherapy. We currently summarize the existing CIPN animal models, including the characteristics of several common animal models such as bortezomib-induced peripheral neuropathy, vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy, and oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. It was found that CIPN may lead to behavioral, histopathological, and neurophysiological changes inducing peripheral neuropathy. However, the mechanism of CIPN has not been fully elucidated, especially the prevention and treatment protocols need to be improved. Therefore, this review article summarizes the progress of research on CIPN animal models and the possible mechanisms and treatment of CIPN.

Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating side effect of many common anti-cancer agents that can lead to dose reduction or treatment discontinuation, which decrease chemotherapy efficacy. Long-term CIPN can interfere with activities of daily living and diminish the quality of life. The mechanism of CIPN is not yet fully understood, and biomarkers are needed to identify patients at high risk and potential treatment targets. Metabolomics can capture the complex behavioral and pathophysiological processes involved in CIPN. This chapter is to review the CIPN metabolomics studies to find metabolic pathways potentially involved in CIPN. These potential CIPN metabolites are then investigated to determine whether there is evidence from studies of other neuropathy etiologies such as diabetic neuropathy and Leber hereditary optic neuropathy to support the importance of these pathways in peripheral neuropathy. Six potential biomarkers and their putative mechanisms in peripheral neuropathy were reviewed. Among these biomarkers, histidine and phenylalanine have clear roles in neurotransmission or neuroinflammation in peripheral neuropathy. Further research is needed to discover and validate CIPN metabolomics biomarkers in large clinical studies.

Overview of Warm Acupuncture for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the common side effects in tumor treatment and has now become a thorny problem limiting tumor treatment. Due to the complex mechanism of CIPN, it is commonly treated clinically with symptomatic treatment, supplemented by sedation and antidepressants, with poor therapeutic effects. In this paper, we review the treatment of CIPN with warm acupuncture in order to provide reference and basis for the clinical treatment of CIPN.

Considerations for a Reliable In Vitro Model of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is widely recognized as a potentially severe toxicity that often leads to dose reduction or discontinuation of cancer treatment. Symptoms may persist despite discontinuation of chemotherapy and quality of life can be severely compromised. The clinical symptoms of CIPN, and the cellular and molecular targets involved in CIPN, are just as diverse as the wide variety of anticancer agents that cause peripheral neurotoxicity. There is an urgent need for extensive molecular and functional investigations aimed at understanding the mechanisms of CIPN. Furthermore, a reliable human cell culture system that recapitulates the diversity of neuronal modalities found in vivo and the pathophysiological changes that underlie CIPN would serve to advance the understanding of the pathogenesis of CIPN. The demonstration of experimental reproducibility in a human peripheral neuronal cell system will increase confidence that such an in vitro model is clinically useful, ultimately resulting in deeper exploration for the prevention and treatment of CIPN. Herein, we review current in vitro models with a focus on key characteristics and attributes desirable for an ideal human cell culture model relevant for CIPN investigations.

Probing the peripheral immune response in mouse models of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy highlights their limited translatability.

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a disabling side effect of various chemotherapeutic agents, including oxaliplatin. It is highly prevalent amongst cancer patients, causing sensory abnormalities and pain. Unfortunately, as the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, effective therapeutics are lacking. Neuro-immune interactions have been highlighted as potential contributors to the development and maintenance of CIPN, however, whether this is the case in oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) is yet to be fully established. Methods: In this study we used flow cytometry to examine the peripheral immune response of male C57BL/6 mice following both single and repeated oxaliplatin administration. In animals exposed to repeated dosing, we also undertook mechanical and thermal behavioural assays to investigate how oxaliplatin alters phenotype, and conducted RT-qPCR experiments on bone marrow derived macrophages in order to further inspect the effects of oxaliplatin on immune cells. Results: In contrast to other reports, we failed to observe substantial changes in overall leukocyte, lymphocyte or myeloid cell numbers in dorsal root ganglia, sciatic nerves or inguinal lymph nodes. We did however note subtle, tissue-dependant alterations in several myeloid subpopulations following repeated dosing. These included a significant reduction in MHCII antigen presenting cells in the sciatic nerve and an increase in infiltrating cell types into the inguinal lymph nodes. Though repeated oxaliplatin administration had a systemic effect, we were unable to detect a pain-like behavioural phenotype in response to either cold or mechanical stimuli. Consequently, we cannot comment on whether the observed myeloid changes are associated with OIPN. Conclusions: Our discussion puts these results into the wider context of the field, advocating for greater transparency in reporting, alignment in experimental design and the introduction of more clinically relevant models. Only through joint concerted effort can we hope to increase our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of CIPN, including any immune contributions.

Probing the peripheral immune response in mouse models of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy highlights their limited translatability

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a disabling side effect of various chemotherapeutic agents, including oxaliplatin. It is highly prevalent amongst cancer patients, causing sensory abnormalities and pain. Unfortunately, as the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, effective therapeutics are lacking. Neuro-immune interactions have been highlighted as potential contributors to the development and maintenance of CIPN, however, whether this is the case in oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) is yet to be fully established. Methods: In this study we used flow cytometry to examine the peripheral immune response of male C57BL/6 mice following both single and repeated oxaliplatin administration. In animals exposed to repeated dosing, we also undertook mechanical and thermal behavioural assays to investigate how oxaliplatin alters phenotype, and conducted RT-qPCR experiments on bone marrow derived macrophages in order to further inspect the effects of oxaliplatin on immune cells. Results: In contrast to other reports, we failed to observe substantial changes in overall leukocyte, lymphocyte or myeloid cell numbers in dorsal root ganglia, sciatic nerves or inguinal lymph nodes. We did however note subtle, tissue-dependant alterations in several myeloid subpopulations following repeated dosing. These included a significant reduction in MHCII antigen presenting cells in the sciatic nerve and an increase in infiltrating cell types into the inguinal lymph nodes. Though repeated oxaliplatin administration had a systemic effect, we were unable to detect a pain-like behavioural phenotype in response to either cold or mechanical stimuli. Consequently, we cannot comment on whether the observed myeloid changes are associated with OIPN. Conclusions: Our discussion puts these results into the wider context of the field, advocating for greater transparency in reporting, alignment in experimental design and the introduction of more clinically relevant models. Only through joint concerted effort can we hope to increase our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of CIPN, including any immune contributions.

Probing the peripheral immune response in mouse models of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy highlights their limited translatability

Background: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a disabling side effect of various chemotherapeutic agents, including oxaliplatin. It is highly prevalent amongst cancer patients, causing sensory abnormalities and pain. Unfortunately, as the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood, effective therapeutics are lacking. Neuro-immune interactions have been highlighted as potential contributors to the development and maintenance of CIPN, however, whether this is the case in oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) is yet to be fully established. Methods: In this study we used flow cytometry to examine the peripheral immune response of male C57BL/6 mice following both single and repeated oxaliplatin administration. In animals exposed to repeated dosing, we also undertook mechanical and thermal behavioural assays to investigate how oxaliplatin alters phenotype, and conducted RT-qPCR experiments on bone marrow derived macrophages in order to further inspect the effects of oxaliplatin on immune cells. Results: In contrast to other reports, we failed to observe substantial changes in overall leukocyte, lymphocyte or myeloid cell numbers in dorsal root ganglia, sciatic nerves or inguinal lymph nodes. We did however note subtle, tissue-dependant alterations in several myeloid subpopulations following repeated dosing. These included a significant reduction in MHCII antigen presenting cells in the sciatic nerve and an increase in infiltrating cell types into the inguinal lymph nodes. Though repeated oxaliplatin administration had a systemic effect, we were unable to detect a pain-like behavioural phenotype in response to either cold or mechanical stimuli. Consequently, we cannot comment on whether the observed myeloid changes are associated with OIPN. Conclusions: Our discussion puts these results into the wider context of the field, advocating for greater transparency in reporting, alignment in experimental design and the introduction of more clinically relevant models. Only through joint concerted effort can we hope to increase our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of CIPN, including any immune contributions.

Peripheral Neuropathy under Oncologic Therapies: A Literature Review on Pathogenetic Mechanisms.

Peripheral neurologic complications are frequent adverse events during oncologic treatments and often lead to dose reduction, administration delays with time elongation of the therapeutic plan and, not least, worsening of patients’ quality of life. Experience skills are required to recognize symptoms and clinical evidences and the collaboration between different health professionals, in particular oncologists and hospital pharmacists, grants a correct management of this undesirable occurrence. Some classes of drugs (platinates, vinca alkaloids, taxanes) typically develop this kind of side effect, but the genesis of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is not linked to a single mechanism. This paper aims from one side at summarizing and explaining all the scattering mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy through a detailed literature revision, on the other side at finding new approaches to possible treatments, in order to facilitate the collaboration between oncologists, hematologists and hospital pharmacists.

Drug Repositioning for the Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Mechanism- and Screening-Based Strategy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a severe adverse effect observed in most patients treated with neurotoxic anti-cancer drugs. Currently, there are no therapeutic options available for the prevention of CIPN. Furthermore, few drugs are recommended for the treatment of existing neuropathies because the mechanisms of CIPN remain unclear. Each chemotherapeutic drug induces neuropathy by distinct mechanisms, and thus we need to understand the characteristics of CIPN specific to individual drugs. Here, we review the known pathogenic mechanisms of oxaliplatin- and paclitaxel-induced CIPN, highlighting recent findings. Cancer chemotherapy is performed in a planned manner; therefore, preventive strategies can be planned for CIPN. Drug repositioning studies, which identify the unexpected actions of already approved drugs, have increased in recent years. We have also focused on drug repositioning studies, especially for prevention, because they should be rapidly translated to patients suffering from CIPN.