Mechanical Resuscitation Device Research Articles

The Self-Expandable Impella CP (ECP) as a Mechanical Resuscitation Device.

The survival rate of cardiac arrest (CA) can be improved by utilizing percutaneous left ventricular assist devices (pLVADs) instead of conventional chest compressions. However, existing pLVADs require complex fluoroscopy-guided placement along a guidewire and suffer from limited blood flow due to their cross-sectional area. The recently developed self-expandable Impella CP (ECP) pLVAD addresses these limitations by enabling guidewire-free placement and increasing the pump cross-sectional area. This study evaluates the feasibility of resuscitation using the Impella ECP in a swine CA model. Eleven anesthetized pigs (73.8 ± 1.7 kg) underwent electrically induced CA, were left untreated for 5 min and then received pLVAD insertion and activation. Vasopressors were administered and defibrillations were attempted. Five hours after the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), the pLVAD was removed, and animals were monitored for an additional hour. Hemodynamics were assessed and myocardial function was evaluated using echocardiography. Successful guidewire-free pLVAD placement was achieved in all animals. Resuscitation was successful in 75% of cases, with 3.5 ± 2.0 defibrillations and 1.8 ± 0.4 mg norepinephrine used per ROSC. Hemodynamics remained stable post-device removal, with no adverse effects or aortic valve damage observed. The Impella ECP facilitated rapid guidewire-free pLVAD placement in fibrillating hearts, enabling successful resuscitation. These findings support a broader clinical adoption of pLVADs, particularly the Impella ECP, for CA.

Resuscitation of children with persistent ventricular fibrillation-A case for a mechanical resuscitation device?

Resuscitation of children with persistent ventricular fibrillation-A case for a mechanical resuscitation device?

Airway management during ongoing chest compressions-direct vs. video laryngoscopy. A randomised manikin study.

Tracheal intubation is used for advanced airway management during cardiac arrest, particularly when basic airway techniques cannot ensure adequate ventilation. However, minimizing interruptions of chest compressions is of high priority. Video laryngoscopy has been shown to improve the first-pass success rate for tracheal intubation in emergency airway management. We aimed to compare first-pass success rate and time to successful intubation during uninterrupted chest compression using video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy. A total of 28 anaesthetists and 28 anaesthesia nurses with varied clinical and anaesthesiological experience were recruited for the study. All participants performed a tracheal intubation on a manikin simulator during ongoing chest compressions by a mechanical resuscitation device. Stratified randomisation (physicians/nurses) was performed, with one group using direct laryngoscopy and the other using video laryngoscopy. First-pass success rate was 100% (95% CI: 87.9% - 100.0%) in the video laryngoscopy group and 67.8% (95% CI: 49.3% - 82.1%) in the direct laryngoscopy group [difference: 32.2% (95% CI: 17.8% - 50.8%), p<0.001]. The median time for intubation was 27.5 seconds (IQR: 21.8-31.0 seconds) in the video laryngoscopy group and 30.0 seconds (IQR: 26.5-36.5 seconds) in the direct laryngoscopy group (p = 0.019). This manikin study on tracheal intubation during ongoing chest compressions demonstrates that video laryngoscopy had a higher first-pass success rate and shorter time to successful intubation compared to direct laryngoscopy. Experience in airway management and professional group were not significant predictors. A clinical randomized controlled trial appears worthwhile.

Left ventricular thrombus development during ventricular fibrillation and resolution during resuscitation in a swine model of sudden cardiac arrest

BackgroundIntracardiac thrombus is a well-known complication of low-flow cardiac states including acute myocardial infarction and atrial fibrillation. Little is known, however, about the formation of intracardiac (left ventricular [LV]) thrombus during the extreme low-flow state of cardiac arrest. ObjectiveUsing a swine model of sudden cardiac arrest, we examined the sonographic development of LV thrombus over time after induction of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and resolution of thrombus with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). MethodsThis observational study was IACUC approved. Forty-five Yorkshire swine were sedated, intubated, and instrumented under general anesthesia before VF was electrically induced. Sonographic data was collected immediately after VF induction and at 2-min intervals thereafter. Following 12min of untreated VF, resuscitation was initiated with closed chest compressions using an oxygen-powered mechanical resuscitation device. Observations were continued during attempted resuscitation. At the end of the experiment, the animals were euthanized while still at a surgical depth of anesthesia. The data was analyzed descriptively. ResultsSonographic evidence of LV thrombus was observed in 43/45 animals (95.6% [95%CI: 85.2%, 98.8%]). Thrombus was detected within 6min in 39/45 (86.7% [95%CI: 73.8%, 93.8%]) animals that developed thrombus. Thrombus resolved within 2min after initiation of chest compressions in 31/43 (72.1% [95%CI: 57.3%, 83.3%]) animals. ConclusionSimilar to other low-flow cardiac states, LV thrombus develops early in the natural history of VF arrest and resolves quickly once forward flow is re-established by chest compressions.Institutional protocol number: 154600-8.

Single Rescuer Exertion Using a Mechanical Resuscitation Device: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study

The goal of this experimental study was to investigate rescuer exertion when using "Animax," a manually operated hand-powered mechanical resuscitation device (MRD) for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), compared to standard basic life support (BLS). This was a prospective, open, randomized, crossover simulation study. After being trained, 80 medical students with substantial knowledge in BLS performed one-rescuer CPR using either the MRD or the standard BLS for 12-minute intervals in random order. The main outcome parameter was the heart rate pressure product (RPP) as an index of cardiac work. Secondary outcome parameters were physical exhaustion quantified by the Borg scale (measurement of perceived exertion), Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT; measurement of fine motor skills), and capillary lactate concentration during testing. While no significant difference could be found for the RPP, a significantly increased mean heart rate during the final minute of standard BLS compared to the MRD was found (139 ± 22 beats/min vs. 135 ± 26 beats/min, p = 0.027). By contrast, subjective exertion using the MRD was rated significantly higher on the Borg scale (15.1 ± 2.4 vs. 14.6 ± 2.6, p = 0.027). Mean serum lactate concentration was significantly higher when the MRD was used compared to standard BLS (3.4 ± 1.5 mmol/L vs. 2.1 ± 1.3 mmol/L, p ≤ 0.001). Use of the MRD leads to a RPP of the rescuers comparable to standard BLS. These findings suggest that there is no clinically relevant reduction of exertion if this MRD is used by a single rescuer. If this kind of MRD is used for CPR, frequent changeovers with a second rescuer should be considered as the guidelines suggest for standard CPR.

A manually powered mechanical resuscitation device used by a single rescuer: A randomised controlled manikin study

PurposeThe goal of this randomized, open, controlled crossover manikin study was to compare the performance of “Animax”, a manually operated hand-powered mechanical resuscitation device (MRD) to standard single rescuer basic life support (BLS). MethodsFollowing training, 80 medical students performed either standard BLS or used an MRD for 12min in random order. We compared the quality of chest compressions (effective compressions, compression depth and rate, absolute hands-off time, hand position, decompression), and of ventilation including the number of gastric inflations. An effective compression was defined as a compression performed with correct depth, hand position and decompression. ResultsThe use of the MRD resulted in a significantly higher number of effective compressions compared to standard BLS (67±34 vs. 41±34%, p<0.001). In a comparison with standard BLS, the use of the MRD resulted in less absolute hands-off time (264±57 vs. 79±40s, p<0.001) and in a higher minute-volume (1.86±0.7 vs. 1.62±0.7l, p=0.020). However, ventilation volumes were below the 2005 ERC guidelines for both methods. Gastric inflations occurred only in 0±0.1% with the MRD compared to 3±7% during standard BLS (p<0.001). ConclusionSingle rescuer cardio-pulmonary resuscitation with the manually operated MRD was superior to standard BLS regarding chest compressions in this simulation study. The MRD delivered a higher minute-volume but did not achieve the recommended minimal volume. Further clinical studies are needed to test the MRD's safety and efficacy in patients.

Quality of resuscitation: Flight attendants in an airplane simulator use a new mechanical resuscitation device—A randomized simulation study

Purpose Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during flight is challenging and has to be sustained for long periods. In this setting a mechanical-resuscitation-device (MRD) might improve performance. In this study we compared the quality of resuscitation of trained flight attendants practicing either standard basic life support (BLS) or using a MRD in a cabin-simulator. Methods Prospective, open, randomized and crossover simulation study. Study participants, competent in standard BLS were trained to use the MRD to deliver both chest compressions and ventilation. 39 teams of two rescuers resuscitated a manikin for 12 min in random order, standard BLS or mechanically assisted resuscitation. Primary outcome was “absolute hands-off time” (sum of all periods during which no hand was placed on the chest minus ventilation time). Various parameters describing the quality of chest compression and ventilation were analysed as secondary outcome parameters. Results Use of the MRD led to significantly less “absolute hands-off time” (164 ± 33 s vs. 205 ± 42 s, p < 0.001). The quality of chest compression was comparable among groups, except for a higher compression rate in the standard BLS group (123 ± 14 min −1 vs. 95 ± 11 min −1, p < 0.001). Tidal volume was higher in the standard BLS group (0.48 ± 0.14 l vs. 0.34 ± 0.13 l, p < 0.001), but we registered fewer gastric inflations in the MRD group (0.4 ± 0.3% vs. 16.6 ± 16.9%, p < 0.001). Conclusion Using the MRD resulted in significantly less “absolute hands-off time”, but less effective ventilation. The translation of higher chest compression rate into better outcome, as shown in other studies previously, has to be investigated in another human outcome study.

Quality of resuscitation: Flight attendants in an airplane simulator use a new mechanical resuscitation device; a simulation study

Quality of resuscitation: Flight attendants in an airplane simulator use a new mechanical resuscitation device; a simulation study