Mechanical Properties Of Abdominal Aorta Research Articles

Biomechanical characterization and constitutive modeling of the layer-dissected residual strains and mechanical properties of abdominal porcine aorta

We analyze the residual stresses and mechanical properties of layer-dissected infrarenal abdominal aorta (IAA). We measured the axial pre-stretch and opening angle and performed uniaxial tests to study and compare the mechanical behavior of both intact and layer-dissected porcine IAA samples under physiological loads. Finally, some of the most popular anisotropic hyperelastic constitutive models (GOH and microfiber models) were proposed to estimate the mechanical properties of the abdominal aorta by least-square fitting of the recorded in-vitro uniaxial test results.The results show that the residual stresses are layer dependent. In all cases, we found that the OA in the media layer is lower than in the whole artery, the intima and the adventitia. For the axial pre-stretch, we found that the adventitia and the media were slightly stretched in the environment of the intact arterial strip, whereas the intima appears to be compressed. Regarding the mechanical properties, the media seems to be the softest layer over the whole deformation domain showing high anisotropy, while the intima and adventitia exhibit considerable stiffness and a lower anisotropy response. Finally, all the hyperelastic anisotropic models considered in this study provided a reasonable approximation of the experimental data. The GOH model showed the best fitting.

Preclinical Changes in the Mechanical Properties of Abdominal Aorta in Obese Children

Preclinical Changes in the Mechanical Properties of Abdominal Aorta in Obese Children

Preclinical changes in the mechanical properties of abdominal aorta in obese children

Obesity in childhood has been associated with the development of early cardiovascular abnormalities. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether preclinical functional changes are detectable in the abdominal aorta of obese children. One hundred consecutively seen obese children and 50 healthy controls were studied. The groups were matched in terms of age and gender. The pulsatile wall-motion of the abdominal aorta was determined using a B-mode ultrasound technique. The following mechanical property parameters were measured or computed: lumen diastolic and systolic diameters, relative aortic strain, elastic modulus, and stiffness. Compared to controls, obese children had higher blood pressure values and higher concentrations of total cholesterol, triglycerides, insulin, and C-reactive protein. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score, a parameter of insulin resistance, was significantly higher in obese children than in controls (3.2 ± 1.9 v 1.4 ± 0.5, P < .001). Aortic mechanical parameters were significantly different in obese children as compared to controls: stiffness was higher (3.00 ± 1.45 v 2.22 ± 0.87, P < .001) as was elastic modulus (0.38 ± 0.18 v 0.24 ± 0.10 N/m 2, P < .001). Obese girls with insulin resistance (ie, in the highest tertile of HOMA, >3.7) had increased aortic stiffness (3.79 ± 2.25) compared to obese girls in the lowest tertiles of HOMA (2.67 ± 1.09 , P = .045), even after adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors ( P = .031). The present findings suggest that preclinical changes in the aortic elastic properties are detectable in obese children. Insulin resistance seems to play an important role in the increased rigidity of the aortic wall in obese girls.

Influence of sympathetic stimulation on the mechanical properties of the aorta in humans

The mechanical properties of the aorta play a major role in the regulation of blood pressure and cardiac performance. The effect of sympathetic stimulation on the mechanical properties of the human abdominal aorta was studied in 19 healthy volunteers, divided into young (25 +/- 2 years) and elderly individuals (69 +/- 2 years) of both sexes. A non-invasive ultrasonic echo-tracking system for measurement of systolic/diastolic variation of aortic diameter in combination with intra-aortic pressure measurements was used to determine wall mechanics. The pressure-diameter (P-D) relationship and the distensibility indices, stiffness (beta) and pressure strain elastic modulus (Ep) of the abdominal aorta were obtained. Measurements were made at rest and during sympathetic stimulation induced by lower body negative pressure (LBNP). As a sign of sympathetic activation, the peripheral resistance increased by 74-96% (P < 0.001) during LBNP. However, the mechanical properties of the abdominal aorta remained unaltered, as estimated either from the P-D relationship or from the indices Ep and beta, both in the young (rest: Ep = 0.53 +/- 0.18, beta = 4.5 +/- 1.5; LBNP: Ep = 0.51 +/- 0.15, beta = 4.5 +/- 1.2, NS) and in the elderly (rest: Ep = 2.17 +/- 0.70, beta = 17.6 +/- 5.8; LBNP: Ep = 2.11 +/- 0.60, beta = 16.9 +/- 3.9, NS). In conclusion, this investigation shows that LBNP-induced sympathetic activation does not change aortic wall mechanics. Thus, sympathetic modulation of the aortic smooth muscle contractile activity seems to be unimportant in the blood pressure regulation.