Measurement Of Tibial Translation Research Articles

Passive Posterior Tibial Subluxation on Routine Knee MRI as a Secondary Sign of PCL Tear.

The posterior drawer test is an accurate clinical test to diagnose posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), indicating laxity of the PCL that allows posterior tibial translation. This study aimed to determine whether posterior tibial translation relative to the femur on routine MRI could serve as an additional sign of PCL tear. Routine knee MRI in eleven patients (7 males, 4 females) with arthroscopically confirmed isolated PCL tears were reviewed independently by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Measurements of tibial translation were made in the medial and lateral compartments of patients and controls (10 males, 12 females) without clinical or MRI evidence of ligament injury. Significant medial compartment posterior tibial translation was present in patients with PCL tear compared to controls (+2.93 mm versus +0.03 mm, P = 0.002) with excellent interobserver agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.94). No significant difference in lateral compartment tibial translation was observed (+0.17 mm versus −0.57 mm, P = 0.366) despite excellent interobserver agreement (ICC = 0.96). Posterior tibial translation in the midmedial compartment may be a secondary sign of isolated PCL tear on routine knee MRI with passive extension without manipulation or weight bearing. Additional work in a larger cohort may better address the accuracy of this finding.

The contribution of each anterior cruciate ligament bundle to the Lachman test

The clinical diagnosis of a partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is still subject to debate. Little is known about the contribution of each ACL bundle during the Lachman test. We investigated this using six fresh-frozen cadaveric lower limbs. Screws were placed in the femora and tibiae as fixed landmarks for digitisation of the bone positions. The femur was secured horizontally in a clamp. A metal hook was screwed to the tibial tubercle and used to apply a load of 150N directed anteroposteriorly to the tibia to simulate the Lachman test. The knees then received constant axial compression and 3D knee kinematic data were collected by digitising the screw head positions in 30° flexion under each test condition. Measurements of tibial translation and rotation were made, first with the ACL intact, then after sequential cutting of the ACL bundles, and finally after complete division of the ACL. Two-way analysis of variance analysis was performed. During the Lachman test, in all knees and in all test conditions, lateral tibial translation exceeded that on the medial side. With an intact ACL, both anterior and lateral tibial landmarks translated significantly more than those on the medial side (p < 0.001). With sequential division of the ACL bundles, selective cutting of the posterolateral bundle (PLB) did not increase translation of any landmark compared with when the ACL remained intact. Cutting the anteromedial bundle (AMB) resulted in an increased anterior translation of all landmarks. Compared to the intact ACL, when the ACL was fully transected a significant increase in anterior translation of all landmarks occurred (p < 0.001). However, anterior tibial translation was almost identical after AMB or complete ACL division. We found that the AMB confers its most significant contribution to tibial translation during the Lachman test, whereas the PLB has a negligible effect on anterior translation. Section of the PLB had a greater effect on increasing the internal rotation of the tibia than the AMB. However, its contribution of a mean of 2.8° amplitude remains low. The clinical relevance of our investigation suggests that, based on anterior tibial translation only, one cannot distinguish between a full ACL and an isolated AMB tear. Isolated PLB tears cannot be detected solely by the Lachman test, as this bundle probably contributes more resistance to the pivot shift.

Significance of Changes in the Reference Position for Measurements of Tibial Translation and Diagnosis of Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

Significance of Changes in the Reference Position for Measurements of Tibial Translation and Diagnosis of Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

Significance of Changes in the Reference Position for Measurements of Tibial Translation and Diagnosis of Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

Significance of Changes in the Reference Position for Measurements of Tibial Translation and Diagnosis of Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

Significance of Changes in the Reference Position for Measurements of Tibial Translation and Diagnosis of Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

Measurements of tibial translation in response to an external load are used in clinical and laboratory settings to diagnose and characterize knee-ligament injuries. Before these measurements can be quantified, a reference position of the knee must be established (defined as the position of the knee with no external forces or moments applied). The objective of this study was to determine the effects of cruciate ligament deficiency on this reference position and on subsequent measurements of tibial translation and, in so doing, to establish a standard of kinematic measurement for future biomechanical studies. Thirty-six human cadaveric knees were studied with a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The reference positions of the intact and posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees of 18 specimens were determined at full extension and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 degrees of flexion, and the remaining five-degree-of-freedom knee motion was unrestricted. Subsequently, under a 134-N anterior-posterior load, the resulting knee kinematics were measured with respect to the reference positions of the intact and posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. With posterior cruciate ligament deficiency, the reference position of the knee moved significantly in the posterior direction, reaching a maximal shift of 9.3 +/- 3.8 mm at 90 degrees of flexion. For the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee, posterior tibial translation ranged from 13.0 +/- 3.4 to 17.7 +/- 3.6 mm at 30 and 90 degrees, respectively, when measured with respect to the reference positions of the intact knee. When measured with respect to the reference positions of the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee, these values were significantly lower, ranging from 11.7 +/- 4.3 mm at 30 degrees of knee flexion to 8.4 +/- 4.8 mm at 90 degrees. A similar protocol was performed to study the effects of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency on 18 additional knees. With anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, only a very small anterior shift in the reference position was observed. Overall, this shift did not significantly affect measurements of tibial translation in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Thus, when the tibial translation in the posterior cruciate ligament-injured knee is measured when the reference position of the intact knee is not available, errors can occur and the measurement may not completely reflect the significance of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency. However, there should be less corresponding error when measuring the tibial translation of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee because the shift in reference position with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency is too small to be significant. We therefore recommend that in the clinical setting, where the reference position of the knee changes with injury, comparison of total anterior-posterior translation with that of the uninjured knee can be a more reproducible and accurate measurement for assessing cruciate-ligament injury, especially in posterior cruciate ligament-injured knees. Similarly, in biomechanical testing where tibial translations are often reported for the ligament-deficient and reconstructed knees, a fixed reference position should be chosen when measuring knee kinematics. If such a standard is set, measurements of knee kinematics will more accurately reflect the altered condition of the knee and allow valid comparisons between studies.

Significance of changes in the reference position for measurements of tibial translation and diagnosis of cruciate ligament deficiency.

Measurements of tibial translation in response to an external load are used in clinical and laboratory settings to diagnose and characterize knee-ligament injuries. Before these measurements can be quantified, a reference position of the knee must be established (defined as the position of the knee with no external forces or moments applied). The objective of this study was to determine the effects of cruciate ligament deficiency on this reference position and on subsequent measurements of tibial translation and, in so doing, to establish a standard of kinematic measurement for future biomechanical studies. Thirty-six human cadaveric knees were studied with a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. The reference positions of the intact and posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees of 18 specimens were determined at full extension and at 30, 60, 90, and 120 degrees of flexion, and the remaining five-degree-of-freedom knee motion was unrestricted. Subsequently, under a 134-N anterior-posterior load, the resulting knee kinematics were measured with respect to the reference positions of the intact and posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. With posterior cruciate ligament deficiency, the reference position of the knee moved significantly in the posterior direction, reaching a maximal shift of 9.3 +/- 3.8 mm at 90 degrees of flexion. For the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee, posterior tibial translation ranged from 13.0 +/- 3.4 to 17.7 +/- 3.6 mm at 30 and 90 degrees, respectively, when measured with respect to the reference positions of the intact knee. When measured with respect to the reference positions of the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee, these values were significantly lower, ranging from 11.7 +/- 4.3 mm at 30 degrees of knee flexion to 8.4 +/- 4.8 mm at 90 degrees. A similar protocol was performed to study the effects of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency on 18 additional knees. With anterior cruciate ligament deficiency, only a very small anterior shift in the reference position was observed. Overall, this shift did not significantly affect measurements of tibial translation in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Thus, when the tibial translation in the posterior cruciate ligament-injured knee is measured when the reference position of the intact knee is not available, errors can occur and the measurement may not completely reflect the significance of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency. However, there should be less corresponding error when measuring the tibial translation of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee because the shift in reference position with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency is too small to be significant. We therefore recommend that in the clinical setting, where the reference position of the knee changes with injury, comparison of total anterior-posterior translation with that of the uninjured knee can be a more reproducible and accurate measurement for assessing cruciate-ligament injury, especially in posterior cruciate ligament-injured knees. Similarly, in biomechanical testing where tibial translations are often reported for the ligament-deficient and reconstructed knees, a fixed reference position should be chosen when measuring knee kinematics. If such a standard is set, measurements of knee kinematics will more accurately reflect the altered condition of the knee and allow valid comparisons between studies.

Intratester and intertester reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in the assessment of posterior laxity of the knee.

We measured tibial translation in the knees of 22 subjects with posterior cruciate ligament tears or reconstructions by using the KT-1000 arthrometer. To assess the reliability of the device, two testers made measurements. One tester was a novice and the second tester had substantial clinical experience with the KT-1000 arthrometer. The quadriceps neutral angle was found for the uninvolved knee. Anterior and posterior translation and total anterior-posterior excursion were then measured. The quadriceps neutral angle was then reproduced in the involved knee and the same measurements were taken. Each subject was tested twice by each tester. The intraclass correlation coefficient values for the novice, experienced, and intertester reliability were 0.67, 0.79, and 0.62, respectively, for corrected posterior translation; 0.59, 0.68, and 0.64, respectively, for corrected anterior translation; 0.70, 0.74, and 0.29, respectively, for quadriceps neutral angle; and 0.84, 0.83, and 0.62, respectively, for total anterior-posterior excursion. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for the novice, experienced, and intertester reliability were +/-2.95, +/-2.53, and +/-3.27 mm, respectively, for corrected posterior translation; +/-3.99, +/-3.89, and +/-3.74 mm, respectively, for corrected anterior translation; and +/-10.70 degrees, +/-11.73 degrees, and +/-16.25 degrees, respectively, for quadriceps neutral angle. The KT-1000 arthrometer was found to be a moderately reliable tool for the measurement of tibial translation in patients with posterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstructions.

The effects of muscle fatigue on neuromuscular function and anterior tibial translation in healthy knees.

We investigated the effect of quadriceps and hamstring muscle fatigue on anterior tibial translation and muscle reaction time in 10 healthy subjects. The six men and four women had an average age of 21.3 years and had no known pathologic knee conditions. Each patient underwent a knee examination, arthrometer measurements of tibial translation, subjective functional assessment, and an anterior tibial translation stress test before and after quadriceps and hamstring muscle-fatiguing exercise. The recruitment order of the lower extremity muscles in response to anterior tibial translation did not change with muscle fatigue. However, the results showed an average increase of 32.5% in anterior tibial translation (range, 11.4% to 85.2%) after fatigue. Muscle responses in the gastrocnemius, hamstring, and quadriceps originating at the spinal cord and cortical level showed significant slowing and, in some cases, an absence of activity after the quadriceps and hamstring muscles were fatigued. The increases in displacement after fatigue strongly correlated (0.62 to 0.96) with a delay in cortical-level activity (intermediate and voluntary). Muscle fatigue, which appears to affect the dynamic stability of the knee, alters the neuromuscular response to anterior tibial translation. Therefore, fatigue may play an important role in the pathomechanics of knee injuries in physically demanding sports.

Evaluation of an electrogoniometric instrument for measurement of laxity of the knee.

Eight lower extremities from cadavera were tested for anterior-posterior laxity in two positions before and after transection of the anterior cruciate ligament. At critical points in the tests, electrogoniometric and radiographic measurements of tibiofemoral translation were compared. By direct measurement, we determined the accuracy of the radiographic method to +/- 0.4 millimeter (95 per cent) in measuring anterior-posterior translations of the tibia with respect to the femur. The electrogoniometer estimated displacement of the tibia with respect to the femur during the anterior drawer test to be 3.5 +/- 8.2 millimeters at 90 degrees of flexion of the knee and 11.1 +/- 16.1 millimeters at 30 degrees of flexion. Direct comparison of these measurements with those obtained by means of the radiographic technique showed that the electrogoniometer tended, on average, to overestimate the tibial translation. The amount of overestimation was 0.7 millimeter for intact knees and 1.9 millimeters after sacrifice of the anterior cruciate ligament. Despite this small average error in measurement of tibial translation, the difference between individual electrogoniometric and radiographic measurements varied greatly, with a 95 per cent confidence limit of +/- 5.5 millimeters. The error of the electrogoniometric measurements varied with the angle of flexion of the knee during testing, both the accuracy and the reliability of the electrogoniometric measurements being greatly diminished at 30 degrees of flexion. The electrogoniometric method also tended to overestimate tibial internal rotation (by an average of 10.5 degrees) and external rotation (by an average of 9.3 degrees); the reliability of these measurements was +/- 6.9 degrees.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)