Direct continuous noninvasive measurement of local muscle blood flow in humans remains limited. Conventional measurements of limb blood flow, such as Doppler ultrasound or venous occlusion plethysmography, measure changes in bulk conduit flow and do not provide regional information. Near‐infrared diffuse correlation spectroscopy (DCS) is an emerging technique for non‐invasive measurement of local muscle blood flow at the microvascular level. In order to better understand the strengths and limitations of this novel approach, we performed a validation study by comparing muscle blood flow changes measured by DCS and Doppler ultrasound during exercise. Ten subjects were recruited for this study (age: 27±3 yrs; female/male: 1/9; BMI: 27.0±3.6 kg/m2). The DCS probe was affixed to the forearm over the belly of the flexor digitorum profundus. Brachial artery blood velocity and diameter were measured with Doppler ultrasound, integrated, and reported as brachial artery blood flow. After a brief period of rest, each participant performed rhythmic handgrip exercise at 20% and 50% of their maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). As expected, brachial artery blood flow increased significantly from baseline by 312±56% at 20% MVC, and 613±90% at 50% MVC. Blood flow index (BFI), the primary output from DCS, shared a similar change from baseline, increasing 112±18% and 262±35%, respectively. To more appropriately compare these two approaches, the data were normalized to each person's individual maximum for each respective technique. Remarkably, the increase in skeletal muscle blood flow was strikingly similar between the two techniques, when reported in normalized units (20%: 0.42±0.03 vs. 0.45±0.03; 50%: 0.69±0.04 vs. 0.79±0.02, DCS vs. BA flow, respectively). The change in skeletal muscle blood flow by DCS and Doppler ultrasound were also strongly correlated (r2=0.77, P<0.001). Taken together, these data show that DCS and Doppler ultrasound quantify the same temporal dynamics of skeletal muscle blood flow during exercise. While these results are indeed encouraging, more work is needed to fully validate this approach for measuring local microvascular blood flow in humans.Support or Funding InformationThis work was support by an Interdisciplinary Research Program grant from the University of Texas at Arlington.
Read full abstract