ABSTRACT This study contends that the politics of the commons framework is essential for identifying inherent political dynamics within atmospheric commons. It highlights boundary work and meaning-making practices as key components of commons politics and ultimately shapes the approach to management. To support this argument, the study presents a case of a South Korean social movement led by a mothers’ group, Call for Response to Particulate Matter. By engaging in boundary work and meaning-making practices to protect children’s health, the group successfully influenced national discourse and collaborated with the government. While this resulted in changes to Korean laws and policies related to PM pollution, the study reveals limitations that prevented the group’s scope and meaning from extending to broader origins of air pollution. Beyond commons management, attention to commons politics raises important questions about who advocates for the commons, who delineates boundaries, and the meanings attributed. Commons management is shaped by these boundaries and meanings, potentially excluding elements outside established boundaries that could aid broader social change or lifestyle adjustments.
Read full abstract