Background Proscan treats errors of refraction without affecting asphericity, while customized treatment treats correction with high-order aberration (HOA). Recently, Zyoptix HD has been used in the treatment of preoperative HOA and lower-order aberrations without inducing spherical aberrations. Aim To compare the visual outcomes and HOAs after optimized surface ablation versus Zyoptix HD surface ablation for myopia. Patients and methods A prospective comparative clinically controlled study was conducted on patients who have myopia, 40 eyes of 20 patients divided into two groups. Group I: 20 eyes underwent optimized surface ablation. Group II: 20 eyes underwent customized plus optimized surface ablation. The selection of treatment was according to root mean square and spherical aberration corneal topography. All participants were examined by a slit lamp just after the operation, on the first, third, seventh postoperative day, weekly for 1 month, then biweekly for 3 months. The patients had full follow-up by best corrected visual acuity, slit lamp, Orbscan IIZ, and wavefront aberrometry using Zywave after 3 months of procedure. Results The comparison between preoperative uncorrected visual acuity and 3 months postoperative uncorrected visual acuity improved significantly in both groups but better in group II. The comparison between preoperative and 3 months postoperative root mean square in group I increased significantly, and in group II improved significantly, which is better in group II. Conclusion Zyoptix HD is superior to optimized surface ablation in the correction of low-order and high-order eye aberrations, correcting myopia and visual acuity.
Read full abstract