Profile soil water content (SWC) is a vital variable in the atmosphere-vegetation-soil system. Although remote sensing currently can provide reliable surface SWC data (∼5 cm depth), acquiring accurate subsurface SWC data from existing reanalysis products remain challenging. In this study, we evaluated two widely used methods in estimating subsurface SWC, namely the exponential filter (ExpF) and the principle of maximum entropy (POME). The evaluation is carried out in two distinct areas on the Tibetan Plateau using ground observations collected from two monitoring networks: the Maqu network area characterized by cold humid climate and grassland and the Shiquanhe network area characterized by cold arid climate and bare ground. The results indicate that POME generally performs better than ExpF in both areas, particularly in deeper soil layers. Specifically, the accuracy of estimated SWC using the ExpF method decreases with depth, while it increases with depth using the POME method. Additionally, both methods achieve commendable performance at a depth of 10 cm in both areas. The deficiency of ExpF is mainly reflected in underestimations for dry cases, which is amplified with increasing depth. Dry cases account for 51 % in the humid area and 68 % in the arid area throughout the study period. Consequently, the ExpF method yields higher root mean square differences (RMSD) by 30 % and 113 % in the humid area at depths of 20 and 40 cm, respectively, compared to the POME method. Similarly, it results in higher RMSD values by 220 % and 200 % in the arid area. As expected, the superior performance of POME in deeper soil layers is primarily attributed to the incorporation of additional bottom and profile mean SWC observations. However, it also potentially introduces uncertainties when integrated with satellite-based data, which inherently contains errors compared to ground observations. To assess the potential of these two methods in large-scale applications combined with satellite-based datasets, this study conducted further evaluation of both methods with required input data derived from the soil moisture active and passive mission (SMAP). The results demonstrate that the performance of both methods in estimating subsurface SWC is acceptable in both humid and arid areas, although some bias is transferred from the input data. They achieve average RMSD values of 0.034 and 0.055 m3/m−3(−|−) in the humid area for the ExpF and POME methods, respectively, and 0.021 and 0.014 m3/m−3(−|−) in the arid area.
Read full abstract