Mean Injury Severity Score Research Articles

Thoracic irrigation for traumatic hemothorax: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Traumatic hemothoraces (HTXs) are common, and tube thoracostomy (TT) insertion is generally the initial management. However, a retained HTX can develop into a fibrothorax or empyema requiring secondary intervention. We hypothesized that irrigation of the thoracic cavity at the time of TT may prevent retained HTX. METHODS Pubmed, EMBASE, and Scopus were searched from inception to May 2024. Studies with adult trauma patients with traumatic HTX who received a TT and had patients who underwent thoracic irrigation were included. The primary outcome was failure rate, defined as retained HTX requiring a second intervention. Cumulative analysis was performed with χ2 for dichotomous variables and unpaired t test for continuous variables. A fixed-effects model was applied for meta-analysis. RESULTS Six studies were included in the analysis; two retrospective and four prospective observational studies. These studies included 1,319 patients (513 irrigated TT, 837 nonirrigated TT). The mean age of patients was 45 years, 81% were male, mean Injury Severity Score was 21, and 42% had penetrating trauma. Failure rate was significantly lower in the irrigation group on cumulative analysis (10.7% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) and meta-analysis (effect size, 0.704; 95% confidence interval, 0.218–1.190; I 2 = 0.4; p < 0.001]. In addition, on meta-analysis, the irrigation group had a shorter TT duration and hospital and ICU length of stay (all p < 0.05). There were no differences in overall infectious complications, readmission, or mortality; however, all the models favored the irrigation group. CONCLUSION Patients who undergo simultaneous TT and thoracic irrigation have a lower rate of retained HTX and require fewer secondary interventions. Thoracic irrigation for traumatic HTX should be considered; however, randomized studies are needed prior to development of guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level III.

Injuries from border wall falls after 2018 are more severe: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe U.S.-Mexico “border wall” between El Paso, Texas and Ciudad Juárez, Mexico was raised and extended beginning in 2018 in accordance with Presidential Executive Order 13,767. We hypothesized that these changes resulted in increased incidence and severity of injuries of individuals attempting to cross the border wall in the El Paso region.MethodsA retrospective cohort review was conducted of University Medical Center of El Paso Trauma Registry charts from 2001 to 2022. Year of injury, gender, age, Injury Severity Score, hospital length-of-stay, ICU length-of-stay, ventilator days, and survival were analyzed by Chi-square analysis with Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and Independent Samples T-test for continuous variables. An independent samples Mann Whitney U Test was used to compare border wall fall injuries before and after 2018.ResultsOf the 842 patients reviewed, 69 patients presented before 2018 and 773 presented from 2018 to 2022. Statistically significant differences were identified in the mean Injury Severity Score which increased from 6.3 (SD ± 3.8) to 8.3 (SD ± 5.5, p < .001) and the mean hospital length-of-stay which increased from 6.7 days (SD ± 5.5) to 9.5 days (SD ± 8.0, p < .005).ConclusionThe incidence, severity, and hospital length-of-stay related to injuries crossing the U.S.-Mexico border have increased with changes in height of the border wall since 2018. Additional resources should be allocated to Emergency Departments and Trauma Centers along the Southwest Border to serve this unique patient population. Additional consideration should be given to the cost of the border wall.

The Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Cerclage Cable Fixation for Displaced Acetabular Fractures Using a Posterior Approach: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and Objectives: Cerclage cable fixation with 2 mm multiple-braided cables for displaced acetabular fractures has shown good midterm functional and radiographic outcomes. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cerclage cable fixations over ten years. Materials and Methods: We extracted data for patients who underwent cerclage cable fixation for acetabular fractures at a single institution from 2007 to 2012. We adopted this procedure for acetabulum fractures with posterior column fractures. Postoperative reduction quality, complications, reoperations, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip objective functional scores were analyzed. Postoperative reduction quality was classified using plain radiography and computed tomography. Results: We evaluated nine patients with a mean follow-up period of 14.1 ± 2.6 years (range: 10.8-18.1 years). The mean age was 47.1 ± 15.5 years old (range: 28-74 years); the mean injury severity score was 13.6 ± 4.7 (range: 9-22). The most frequent type of fracture was a both-column fracture. Anatomical reduction quality was achieved in five cases. Four patients had hip osteoarthritis at the last follow-up; among them, one patient had worsening hip arthritis > 5 years after surgery, and one patient developed osteoarthritis > 10 years after surgery. Their postoperative reduction quality was worse than their anatomical reduction quality, and both engaged in physical labor. None of the patients underwent revision total hip arthroplasty. The mean JOA hip score was 90.9 ± 7.9 (range: 74-100); seven patients scored >90 at the last follow-up. Conclusions: Cerclage cable fixation showed satisfactory postoperative reductions and favorable long-term clinical outcomes. Long-term follow-up might be necessary for patients whose postoperative reduction is not anatomical to detect late occurrence of hip osteoarthritis, even if osteoarthritis is not evident during short-term follow-up periods.

Epidemiological analysis of a 10-year retrospective study of pediatric trauma in intensive care

Pediatric trauma plays a crucial role in pediatric mortality, with traffic injuries and falls frequently cited as leading causes of significant injuries among children. A comprehensive investigation, including geographical factors, is essential for developing effective strategies to prevent injuries and alleviate the burden of pediatric trauma. This study involved a retrospective analysis of clinical data from pediatric patients admitted to our hospital’s intensive care unit (ICU) due to trauma over a 10-year period. Comprehensive analyses were conducted to elucidate trends, demographics, injury patterns, and risk factors associated with these admissions. This retrospective study included 951 pediatric patients (mean age: 4.79 ± 3.24 years; mean weight: 18.45 ± 9.02 kg; median time to ICU admission post-injury: 10.86 ± 14.95 h). Among these patients, 422 (44.4%) underwent emergency surgery, and 466 (49%) required mechanical ventilation support, with a mean duration of 70.19 ± 146.62 h. The mean duration of ICU stay was 6.24 ± 8.01 days, and the overall mean hospitalization duration was 16.08 ± 15.56 days. The predominant cause of unintentional injury was traffic accidents (47.9%), followed by falls (42.5%) and burns/scalds (5.3%). Most incidents involved children aged 0–6 years (70.7%), with males comprising 60.0% of patients. Injury incidents predominantly occurred between 12 and 6 PM (44.5%) and on non-workdays (37.6%). The most common locations where injuries occurred were roadsides (49%) and rural areas (64.35%). Single-site injuries (58.78%) were more prevalent than multiple-site injuries (41.22%), and head injuries were the most common among single-site injuries (81.57%). At ICU admission, the mean injury severity score was 18.49 ± 8.86. Following active intervention, 871 patients (91.59%) showed improvement, while 80 (8.41%) succumbed to their injuries. Traffic injuries remain the primary cause of pediatric trauma leading to ICU admission, underscoring the importance of using appropriate child restraint systems and protective gear as fundamental preventive measures. The increased incidence of injuries among children aged < 6 years and those residing in rural areas highlights the need for targeted preventive strategies, necessitating tailored interventions and public policy formulations that address these high-risk populations.

Lung ultrasonography underdiagnoses clinically significant pneumothorax

BackgroundUltrasonography for trauma is an integral part of the Advanced Trauma Life Support algorithm and supported extensively in the literature. The reliability of chest ultrasonography as a screening examination for pneumothorax during initial trauma evaluation is unclear. We performed a prospective study where we hypothesized that chest ultrasonography would have low sensitivity for detecting clinically significant pneumothorax. MethodsA prospective observational analysis of patients with blunt chest trauma at a level 1 trauma center was performed. Patients included had supine chest radiography and chest ultrasonography performed prior to intervention as well as confirmatory computed tomographic imaging. All chest ultrasonography was performed in the trauma bay by a registered sonographer. All imaging was evaluated by an attending trauma surgeon and radiologist in real time. ResultsOf 2,185 patients screened with a diagnosis of blunt thoracic trauma, 1,489 patients had chest radiography, chest ultrasonography, and confirmatory computed tomography and were included for analysis. Patients were 71% male, with median age of 42 years, and mean Injury Severity Score of 6. The sensitivity of chest ultrasonography to detect pneumothorax was low. Chest ultrasonography had a false negative rate of 72% (n = 58), with 22% (n = 13) undergoing tube thoracostomy. Patients with false negative examinations had lower initial O2 saturation and systolic blood pressure and were more likely to have rib fractures compared with true negative chest ultrasonography examinations. ConclusionChest ultrasonography performed on initial trauma evaluation has low sensitivity with a high rate of false negative examinations. Because many of these false negative results are clinically significant requiring thoracostomy, using chest ultrasonography alone to screen for pneumothorax should be done with caution.

Transobturator-cable-fixation in pelvic ring injuries with symphyseal disruption - a last resort?

The role of transobturator-cable-fixation (TOCF) in traumatic symphyseal rupture of the pelvic ring remains unclear. This case series aims to evaluate TOCF in complex and revision cases in pelvic surgery. A retrospective analysis of a chronological case series was conducted, studying pelvic fractures stabilized using TOCF between January 2006 and December 2022. The variables considered included age, gender, fracture classification, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Body Mass Index (BMI), trauma mechanism, time to surgery, fixation technique, hospital duration, complications, status on discharge (Glasgow Outcome Scale; GOS), follow-up time and indication for the use of TOCF. All patients (N = 7) were male with a mean age of 64 years and a mean BMI of 29. The mean ISS was 45, with the lowest ISS of 25, indicating that only polytraumatized patients were included. Two anterior-posterior-compression-, four lateral-compression-, and one vertical-shear-pelvic-injury were identified. TOCF was added in six cases to support symphyseal plating and in one case to external fixation. The mean hospital stay was 49 days and the mean follow-up duration was 8.5 months. No complications associated with TOCF were observed during the surgical procedure or follow-up. TOCF showed no procedure-associated complications and effectively supported symphyseal healing in all cases. The main indications were obesity, poor bone quality in elderly patients, and revision cases. TOCF could be considered as a last treatment option in open-book pelvic injuries where plating or external fixation is at risk to fail.

Extremity fractures, attempted suicide, blood transfusion and thromboembolic events are independent risk factors for a prolonged hospital stay in severely injured elderly

MethodsDue to demographic change, the number of polytraumatized geriatric patients (> 64 years) is expected to further increase in the coming years. In addition to the particularities of the accident and the associated injury patterns, prolonged inpatient stays are regularly observed in this group. The aim of the evaluation is to identify further factors that cause prolonged inpatient stays.A study of the data from the TraumaRegister DGU® from 2016–2020 was performed. Inclusion criteria were an age of over 64 years, intensive care treatment in the GAS-region, and an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of at least 16 points. All patients who were above the 80th percentile for the average length of stay or average intensive care stay of the study population were defined as so-called long-stay patients. This resulted in a prolonged inpatient stay of > 25 days and an intensive care stay of > 13 days. Among other, the influence of the cause of the accident, injury patterns according to body regions, the occurrence of complications, and the influence of numerous clinical parameters were examined.ResultsA total of 23,026 patients with a mean age of 76.6 years and a mean ISS of 24 points were included. Mean ICU length of stay was 11 ± 12.9 days (regular length of stay: 3.9 ± 3.1d vs. prolonged length of stay: 12.8 ± 5.7d) and mean inpatient stay was 22.5 ± 18.9 days (regular length of stay: 20.7 ± 15d vs. 35.7 ± 22.3d). A total of n = 6,447 patients met the criteria for a prolonged length of stay. Among these, patients had one more diagnosis on average (4.6 vs. 5.8 diagnoses) and had a higher ISS (21.8 ± 6 pts. vs. 26.9 ± 9.5 pts.)Independent risk factors for prolonged length of stay were intubation duration greater than 6 days (30-fold increased risk), occurrence of sepsis (4x), attempted suicide (3x), presence of extremity injury (2.3x), occurrence of a thromboembolic event (2.7x), and administration of red blood cell concentrates in the resuscitation room (1.9x).ConclusionsThe present analysis identified numerous independent risk factors for significantly prolonged hospitalization of the geriatric polytraumatized patient, which should be given increased attention during treatment. In particular, the need for a smooth transition to psychiatric follow-up treatment or patient-adapted rehabilitative care for geriatric patients with prolonged immobility after extremity injuries is emphasized by these results.

A 20-year retrospective analysis of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism among combat casualties requiring damage-control laparotomy at US military Role 2 surgical units.

Combat casualties receiving damage-control laparotomy at forward deployed, resource-constrained US military Role 2 (R2) surgical units require multiple evacuations, but the added risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in this population has not been defined. To fill this gap, we retrospectively analyzed 20 years of Department of Defense Trauma Registry data to define the VTE rate in this population. Department of Defense Trauma Registry from 2002 to 2023 was queried for US military combat casualties requiring damage-control laparotomy at R2. All deaths were excluded in subsequent analysis. Rates of VTE were assessed, and subgroup analysis was performed on patients requiring massive transfusion. Department of Defense Trauma Registry (n = 288) patients were young (mean age, 25 years) and predominantly male (98%) with severe (mean Injury Severity Score, 26), mostly penetrating injury (76%) and high mortality. Venous thromboembolism rate was high: 15.8% (DVT, 10.3%; pulmonary embolism, 7.1%). In the massively transfused population, the VTE rate was even higher (26.7% vs. 10.2%, p < 0.001). This is the first report that combat casualties requiring damage-control laparotomy at R2 have such high VTE rates. Therefore, for military casualties, we propose screening ultrasound upon arrival to each subsequent capable echelon of care and low threshold for initiating thromboprophylaxis. Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Trauma-related preventable death; data analysis and panel review at a level 1 trauma centre in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Trauma-related death is used as a parameter to evaluate the quality of trauma care and identify cases in which mortality could have been prevented under optimal trauma care conditions. The aim of this study was to identify trauma-related preventable death (TRPD) within our institute by an external expert panel and to evaluate inter-panel reliability. Trauma-related deaths between the 1st of January 2020 and the 1st of February 2022 at the Amsterdam University Medical Centre were identified. The severely injured patients (injury severity score ≥ 16) were enrolled for preventability analysis by an external multidisciplinary panel, consisting of a trauma surgeon, anaesthesiologist, emergency physician, neurosurgeon, and forensic physician. Case descriptions were provided, and panellists were asked to classify deaths as non-preventable, potentially preventable, and preventable. Agreements between the five observers were assessed by Fleiss kappa statistics. In total 95 trauma-related deaths were identified. Of which 36 fatalities were included for analysis, the mean age was 55.3 years (± 24.5), 69.4% were male and 88.9% suffered blunt trauma. The mean injury severity score was 35.3 (± 15.3). Interobserver agreement within the external panel was moderate for survivability (Fleiss kappa 0.474) but low for categorical preventable death classification (Fleiss kappa 0.298). Most of the disagreements were between non-preventable or potentially preventable with care that could have been improved. Multidisciplinary panel review has a moderate inter-observer agreement regarding survivability and low agreement regarding categorical preventable death classification. A valid definition and classification of TRPD is required to improve inter-observer agreement and quality of trauma care.

Beyond Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy: Detection of Auto-Heparinization as a Marker of Endotheliopathy Using Rotational Thromboelastometry.

Background/Objectives: The complexity of trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) is a result of the unique interactions between the patient, trauma, and resuscitation-related causes. The main objective of trauma resuscitation is to create the optimal milieu for both the development of immediate reparatory mechanisms and the prevention of further secondary injuries. Endotheliopathy represents one of the hallmarks of trauma-induced coagulopathy, and comprises endothelial dysfunction, abnormal coagulation, and inflammation, all of which arise after severe trauma and hemorrhagic shock. Methods: We retrospectively and descriptively evaluated 217 patients admitted to the Bucharest Clinical Emergency Hospital who met the Berlin criteria for the diagnosis of multiple trauma. Patients with high suspicion of auto-heparinization were identified according to the dynamic clinical and para-clinical evolution and subsequently tested using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). The ratio between the clot formation time (CT) was used, obtained on the two channels of interest (INTEM/HEPTEM). Results: Among the 217 patients with a mean age of 43.43 ± 15.45 years and a mean injury severity score (ISS) of 36.98 ± 1.875, 42 patients had a reasonable clinical and para-clinical suspicion of auto-heparinization, which was later confirmed by the INTEM/HEPTEM clotting time ratio in 28 cases (12.9% from the entire study population). A multiple linear regression analysis highlighted that serum lactate (estimated 0.02, p = 0.0098) and noradrenaline requirement (estimated 0.03, p = 0.0053) influenced the CT (INTEM/HEPTEM) ratio. Conclusions: There is a subset of multiple trauma patients in which the CT (INTEM/HEPTEM) ratio was influenced only by serum lactate levels and patients' need for vasopressor use, reinforcing the relationship between shock, hypoperfusion, and clotting derangements. This emphasizes the unique response that each patient has to trauma.

Association of social vulnerability and rehospitalization in pediatric motor vehicle trauma patients

IntroductionWe investigated social vulnerability index (SVI) as a tool to identify children at risk for readmission following motor vehicle collisions (MVC). Materials and MethodsAn exploratory retrospective cohort study was conducted of pediatric trauma activations (age 0–15) for MVCs 1/1/2012 to 6/30/2022 at a level 1 trauma center. Eligibility included residence within our center's catchment area. Excluded were mortalities during the index admission. Patient address was geocoded and linked with state-level census tract SVI. Per the CDC, SVI ≥90th percentile defined high vulnerability. We evaluated SVI theme: socioeconomic status (SES), household composition and disability (HCD), minority status and language (MSL), housing and transportation (HT). Outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits and re-hospitalization within 90 days of discharge. Kaplan-Meier plots, relative risk (aRR), and 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) adjusted for injury severity score (ISS) were estimated using log-binomial regression. ResultsOf 429 eligible subjects, 122 (28 %) resided in high SVI communities. High SVI patients had slightly higher mean ISS (8.6 vs 7.5). There was a similar risk of ED re-presentation across SVI groups (aRR=1.18; 95 %CI 0.61–2.29). However, although estimates were unstable, there was a possibility of increased risk of re-hospitalization among the high SVI group (aRR=2.34; 95 %CI 0.68–8.04). By theme, HT had the strongest association (aRR=1.71) for ED representation, whereas SES and HCD had the strongest associations for rehospitalization (aRR=2.03, 2.66, respectively). ConclusionWe observed possible associations between high SVI and higher rates of re-hospitalization. Future research with a larger sample may clarify associations. Level of EvidenceLevel IV; Prognosis Study.

Early Point-of-Care Thromboelastometry Reduces Mortality in Patients with Severe Trauma and Risk of Transfusion: An Analysis Based on the TraumaRegister DGU®.

Background: Thromboelastometry like ROTEM® is a point-of-care method used to assess the coagulation status of patients in a rapid manner being particularly useful in critical care settings, such as trauma, where quick and accurate assessment of coagulation can guide timely and appropriate treatment. Currently, this method is not yet comprehensively available with sparse data on its effectiveness in resuscitation rooms. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of early thromboelastometry on the probability of mass transfusions and mortality of severely injured patients. Methods: The TraumaRegister DGU® was retrospectively analyzed for severely injured patients (2011 until 2020) with information available regarding blood transfusions and Trauma-Associated Severe Hemorrhage (TASH) score components. Patients with an estimated risk of mass transfusion >2% were included in a matched-pair analysis. Cases with and without use of ROTEM® diagnostic were matched based on risk categories for mass transfusion. A total of 1722 patients with ROTEM® diagnostics could be matched with a non-ROTEM® patient with an identical risk category. Adult patients (≥16) admitted to a trauma center in Germany, Austria, or Switzerland with Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale severity ≥3 were included. Results: A total of 83,798 trauma victims were identified after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. For 7740 of these patients, the use of ROTEM® was documented. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) in patients with ROTEM® was 24.3 compared to 19.7 in the non-ROTEM® group. The number of mass transfusions showed no significant difference (14.9% ROTEM® group vs. 13.4% non-ROTEM® group, p = 0.45). Coagulation management agents were given significantly more often in the ROTEM® subgroup. Mortality in the ROTEM® group was 4.1% less than expected (estimated mortality based on RISC II 34.6% vs. observed mortality 30.5% (n = 525)). In the non-ROTEM® group, observed mortality was 1.6% less than expected. Therefore, by using ROTEM® analysis, the expected mortality could be reduced by 2.5% (number needed to treat (NNT) 40; SMR of ROTEM® group: 1:0.88; SMR of non-ROTEM® group: 1:0.96; p = 0.081). Conclusions: Hemorrhage is still one of the leading causes of death of severely injured patients in the first hours after trauma. Early thromboelastometry can lead to a more targeted coagulation management, but is not yet widely available. This study demonstrated that ROTEM® was used for the more severely injured patients and that its use was associated with a less than expected mortality as well as a higher utilization of hemostatic products.

Nurse-Sensitive Indicators as Predictors of Trauma Patient Discharge Disposition.

About 3.5 million trauma patients are hospitalized every year, but 35%-40% require further care after discharge. Nurses' ability to affect discharge disposition by minimizing the occurrence of nurse-sensitive indicators (catheter-associated urinary tract infection [CAUTI], central line-associated bloodstream infection [CLABSI], and hospital-acquired pressure injury [HAPI]) is unknown. These indicators may serve as surrogate measures of quality nursing care. The purpose of this study was to determine whether nursing care, as represented by three nurse-sensitive indicators (CAUTI, CLABSI, and HAPI), predicts discharge disposition in trauma patients. This study was a secondary analysis of the 2021 National Trauma Data Bank. We performed logistic regression analyses to determine the predictive effects of CAUTI, CLABSI, and HAPI on discharge disposition, controlling for participant characteristics. A total of n =29,642 patients were included, of which n =21,469 (72%) were male, n =16,404 (64%) were White, with a mean (SD) age of 44 (14.5) and mean (SD) Injury Severity Score of 23.2 (12.5). We created four models to test nurse-sensitive indicators, both individually and compositely, as predictors. While CAUTI and HAPI increased the odds of discharge to further care by 1.4-1.5 and 2.1 times, respectively, CLABSI was not a statistically significant predictor. Both CAUTI and HAPI are statistically significant predictors of discharge to further care for patients after traumatic injury. High-quality nursing care to prevent iatrogenic complications can improve trauma patients' long-term outcomes.

Presentations and management of hospitalized patients with upper extremity fractures at a level 1 trauma center: a 5-year observational study

BackgroundUpper extremity injuries (UEIs) are common in the emergency departments, yet they are under-reported in developing countries. This study examined the frequency, injury characteristics, and treatment approaches of upper extremity fractures (UEFs) among hospitalized trauma patients in a nationally representative population.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational study including all the hospitalized patients with UEFs in the only level 1 trauma center in Qatar between July 2015 and August 2020. Comparative analyses were performed according to injury mechanisms, severity, and management approach.ResultsA total of 2,023 patients sustained UEIs with an average age of 34.4 ± 12.9 years, and 92% were males. Motor vehicle crashes (MVCs; 42.3%) were the primary cause of shoulder girdle injuries in 48.3% of cases. Fractures of the radius, ulna, and hands occurred in 30.8, 16.5 and 14.5%, respectively. Young adults were more involved in MVCs and motorcycle crashes (MCCs), while pedestrians who were typically older had a higher rate of humerus fractures. Patients with MCCs had a higher rate of clavicle and ulna fractures. Pedestrians were at risk of serious injuries, with a higher mean injury severity score and lower Glasgow Coma Scale.ConclusionMost UEFs patients were young males and mainly affected by MVCs. Shoulder girdle, particularly clavicle and scapula/glenoid fractures, emerged as common injury sites. The study highlighted the potential risk of pedestrian injuries, as reflected in higher injury severity, concomitant injuries, and higher mortality. Future studies are needed to optimize preventive measures by incorporating insights into specific injury mechanisms and patterns of UEIs.

Haemoglobin values, transfusion practices, and long-term outcomes in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: a secondary analysis of CENTER-TBI

Haemoglobin (Hb) thresholds and red blood cells (RBC) transfusion strategies in traumatic brain injury (TBI) are controversial. Our objective was to assess the association of Hb values with long-term outcomes in critically ill TBI patients. We conducted a secondary analysis of CENTER-TBI, a large multicentre, prospective, observational study of European TBI patients. All patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with available haemoglobin data on admission and during the first week were included. During the first seven days, daily lowest haemoglobin values were considered either a continous variable or categorised as < 7.5 g/dL, between 7.5–9.5 and > 9.5 g/dL. Anaemia was defined as haemoglobin value < 9.5 g/dL. Transfusion practices were described as “restrictive” or “liberal” based on haemoglobin values before transfusion (e.g. < 7.5 g/dL or 7.5–9.5 g/dL). Our primary outcome was the Glasgow outcome scale extended (GOSE) at six months, defined as being unfavourable when < 5. Of 1590 included, 1231 had haemoglobin values available on admission. A mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 33 (SD 16), isolated TBI in 502 (40.7%) and a mean Hb value at ICU admission of 12.6 (SD 2.2) g/dL was observed. 121 (9.8%) patients had Hb < 9.5 g/dL, of whom 15 (1.2%) had Hb < 7.5 g/dL. 292 (18.4%) received at least one RBC transfusion with a median haemoglobin value before transfusion of 8.4 (IQR 7.7–8.5) g/dL. Considerable heterogeneity regarding threshold transfusion was observed among centres. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, the increase of haemoglobin value was independently associated with the decrease in the occurrence of unfavourable neurological outcomes (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.70–0.87). Congruous results were observed in patients with the lowest haemoglobin values within the first 7 days < 7.5 g/dL (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.15–3.81) and those between 7.5 and 9.5 g/dL (OR 1.61; 95% CI 1.07–2.42) compared to haemoglobin values > 9.5 g/dL. Results were consistent when considering mortality at 6 months as an outcome. The increase of hemoglobin value was associated with the decrease of mortality (OR 0.88; 95% CI 0.76–1.00); haemoglobin values less than 7.5 g/dL was associated with an increase of mortality (OR 3.21; 95% CI 1.59–6.49). Anaemia was independently associated with long-term unfavourable neurological outcomes and mortality in critically ill TBI patients.Trial registration: CENTER-TBI is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02210221, last update 2022–11–07.

An Abdominal Seat Belt Sign is Associated With Similar Incidence of Hollow Viscus Injury but Increased In-Hospital Mortality in Older Adult Trauma Patients: A PCSA Multicenter Study.

The abdominal seat belt sign (SBS) is associated with an increased risk of hollow viscus injury (HVI). Older age is associated with worse outcomes in trauma patients. Thus, older trauma patients ≥65 years of age (OTPs) may be at an increased risk of HVI with abdominal SBS. Therefore, we hypothesized an increased incidence of HVI and mortality for OTPs vs younger trauma patients (YTPs) with abdominal SBS. This post hoc analysis of a multi-institutional, prospective, observational study (8/2020-10/2021) included patients >18 years old with an abdominal SBS who underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging. Older trauma patients were compared to YTPs (18-64 years old) with bivariate analyses. Of the 754 patients included in this study from nine level-1 trauma centers, there were 110 (14.6%) OTPs and 644 (85.4%) YTPs. Older trauma patients were older (mean 75.3 vs 35.8 years old, P < .01) and had a higher mean Injury Severity Score (10.8 vs 9.0, P = .02). However, YTPs had an increased abdominal abbreviated-injury scale score (2.01 vs 1.63, P = .02). On CT imaging, OTPs less commonly had intraabdominal free fluid (21.7% vs 11.9%, P = .02) despite a similar rate of abdominal soft tissue contusion (P > .05). Older trauma patients also had a statistically similar rate of HVI vs YTPs (5.5% vs 9.8%, P = .15). Despite this, OTPs had increased mortality (5.5% vs 1.1%, P < .01) and length of stay (LOS) (5.9 vs 4.9 days P < .01). Despite a similar rate of HVI, OTPs with an abdominal SBS had an increased rate of mortality and LOS. This suggests the need for heightened vigilance when caring for OTPs with abdominal SBS.

Assessment of Safe Early Fixation Strategies in a Cohort Polytraumatized Patients – How is the Surgical Treatment Influenced by the Injury Pattern?

Abstract Background While the inital assessment and the intial treatment of potentially life-threatening injuries is well-described, the surgical treatment strategy following initial resuscitation remains controversial. Timepoint of surgery and type of surgery still reamin topic of discussions. Various, different strategies for optimal timing of fracture fixation in polytrauma patients exist. Aims This study tests the hypothesis that a concept of clearing patients for early definitive surgery that relies on anatomical and physiologic parameters is influenced by the injury distribution. Methods Polytrauma patients treated at a Level 1 trauma center (01.01.2016 - 31.12.2018). Inclusion: primary admission, injury severity score (ISS) ≥16points, requirement of surgical fixation of major extremity or a truncal injury. Exclusion: death &amp;lt;72h after admission, severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Stratification according to surgical fixation concept: Early total care (ETC, all surgeries &amp;lt;24 h), safe definitive surgery (SDS, staged surgeries &amp;lt;72h), and damage control orthopaedics (DCO, definitive care after stabilization). Endpoints: mortality, complication rates. Parameters of interest: Injury severity and distribution (ISS/AIS), pathophysiologic parameters of hemorrhagic shock, coagulopathy, hypothermia, soft tissue trauma. Results 527 patients, mean age 54.8 SD19.9 years, mean ISS 26.9 SD9.0 points, mortality 20.5%. Group ETC (n=21, 3.9%), Group SDS (n = 284, 53.9%), Group DCO (n = 222, 42.1%). Abdominal and spinal injuries associated with ETC (AIS Abdomen; OR 2.1, 95%CI 1.1 to 4.0, p = 0.026: AIS Spine OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.2 to 3.4, p = 0.007). Extremity and pelvic injuries associated with SDS (OR 1.8, 95%CI 1.1 to 2.8, p = 0.012 and OR 1.3, 95%CI 1.0 to 1.7, p = 0.036), head injuries associated with DCO (OR1.5, 95%CI 1.3 to 1.8, p &amp;lt;0.001). Head injuries were most relevant for mortality and were associated with patients undergoing DCO (29.7%) (ETC; 23.8%, SDS; 13.0%). Conclusion The concept of staged early fixation for major extremity and axial injuries (SDS) was successfully applied in the majority of patients. Predominant head and abdominal injuries were associated with ETC or DCO. The injury distribution influences decision making towards surgical management that is associated with a low complication rate.

Can Patient-centered Education and Pain Management Delivered by Coaches Improve Pain Outcomes After Orthopaedic Trauma? A Randomized Trial.

Pain after orthopaedic trauma is complex, and many patients who have experienced orthopaedic trauma are at increased risk for prolonged opioid utilization after the injury. Patient-centered interventions capable of delivering enhanced education and opioid-sparing pain management approaches must be implemented and evaluated in trauma care settings to improve pain outcomes and minimize opioid-related risks. Does personalized pain education and management delivered by coaches (1) improve pain-related outcomes, (2) reduce opioid consumption, and (3) improve patient-reported outcome measures (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] scores) compared to written discharge instructions on pain management and opioid safety? This clinical trial aimed to examine the effect of a personalized pain education and management intervention, delivered by paraprofessional coaches, on pain-related outcomes and opioid consumption compared with usual care (written discharge instructions on pain management and opioid safety). Between February 2021 and September 2022, 212 patients were randomized to the intervention (49% [104]) or control group (51% [108]). A total of 31% (32 of 104) and 47% (51 of 108) in those groups, respectively, were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 12 weeks or had incomplete datasets, leaving 69% (72 of 104) and 53% (57 of 108) for analysis in the intervention and control group, respectively. Patients randomized to the intervention worked with the paraprofessional coaches throughout hospitalization after their orthopaedic injury and at their 2-, 6-, and 12-week visits with the surgical team after discharge to implement mindfulness-based practices and nonpharmacological interventions. Most participants in the final sample of 129 identified as Black (73% [94 of 129]) and women (56% [72 of 129]), the mean Injury Severity score was 8 ± 4, and one-third of participants were at medium to high risk for an opioid-use disorder based on the Opioid Risk Tool. Participants completed surveys during hospitalization and at the 2-, 6-, and 12-week follow-up visits. Surveys included average pain intensity scores over the past 24 hours measured on the pain numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 and PROMIS measures (physical functioning, pain interference, sleep disturbance). Opioid utilization, measured as daily morphine milligram equivalents, was collected from the electronic health record, and demographic and clinical characteristics were collected from self-report surveys. Groups were compared in terms of mean pain scores at at the 12-week follow-up, daily morphine milligram equivalents both during inpatient and at discharge, and mean PROMIS scores at 12 weeks of follow-up. Additionally, differences in the proportion of participants in each group achieving minimum clinically important differences (MCID) on pain and PROMIS scores were examined. For pain scores, an MCID of 2 points on the pain numeric rating scale assessing past 24-hour pain intensity was utilized. We found no difference between the intervention and control in terms of mean pain score at 12 weeks nor in the proportions of patients who achieved the MCID of 2 points for 24-hour average pain scores (85% [61 of 72] versus 72% [41 of 57], respectively, OR 2.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9 to 5.3]; p = 0.08). No differences were noted in daily morphine milligram equivalents utilized between the intervention and control groups during hospitalization, at discharge, or in prescription refills. Similarly, we observed no differences in the proportions of patients in the intervention and control groups who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Physical Function (81% [58 of 72] versus 63% [36 of 57], respectively, OR 2.2 [95% CI 0.9 to 5.2]; p = 0.06). We saw no differences in the proportions of patients who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Sleep Disturbance between the intervention and control groups (58% [42 of 72] versus 47% [27 of 57], respectively, OR 1.4 [95% CI 0.7 to 3.0]; p = 0.31). The proportion of patients who achieved the MCID on PROMIS Pain Interference scores did not differ between the intervention and the control groups (39% [28 of 72] versus 37% [21 of 57], respectively, OR 1.1 [95% CI 0.5 to 2.1]; p = 0.95). In this trial, we observed no differences between the intervention and control groups in terms of pain outcomes, opioid medication utilization, or patient-reported outcomes after orthopaedic trauma. However, future targeted research with diverse samples of patients at increased risk for poor postoperative outcomes is warranted to ascertain a potentially meaningful patient perceived effect on pain outcomes after working with coaches. Other investigators interested in this interventional approach may consider the coach program as a framework at their institutions to increase access to evidence-based nonpharmacological interventions among patients who are at increased risk for poor postoperative pain outcomes. Smaller, more focused programs connecting patients to coaches to learn about nonpharmacological pain management interventions may deliver a larger impact on patient's recovery and outcomes. Level I, therapeutic study.

Patient Factors Associated With Prolonged Length of Stay After Traumatic Brain Injury.

Background For traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors, recovery can lead to significant time spent in the inpatient/rehabilitation settings. Hospital length of stay (LOS) after TBI is a crucial metric of resource utilization and treatment costs. Risk factors for prolonged LOS (PLOS) after TBI require further characterization. Methodology We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with diagnosed TBI at an urban trauma center. PLOS was defined as the 95th percentile of the LOS of the cohort. Patients with and without PLOS were compared using clinical/injury factors. Analyses included descriptive statistics, non-parametric analyses, and multivariable logistic regression for PLOS status. Results The threshold for PLOS was >24 days. In the cohort of 1,343 patients, 77 had PLOS. PLOS was significantly associated with longer mean intensive care unit (ICU) stays (16.4 vs. 1.5 days), higher mean injury severity scores (18.6 vs. 13.8), lower mean Glasgow coma scale scores (11.3 vs. 13.7) and greater mean complication burden (0.7 vs. 0.1). PLOS patients were more likely to have moderate/severe TBI, Medicaid insurance, and were less likely to be discharged home.In the regression model, PLOS was associated with ICU stay, inpatient disposition, ventilator use, unplanned intubation, and inpatient alcohol withdrawal. Conclusions TBI patients with PLOS were more likely to have severe injuries, in-hospital complications, and Medicaid insurance. PLOS was predicted by ICU stay, intubation, alcohol withdrawal, and disposition to inpatient/post-acute care facilities. Efforts to reduce in-hospital complications and expedite discharge may reduce LOS and accompanying costs.Further validation of these results is needed from larger multicenter studies.

Obesity as a Risk Factor for Adverse Outcomes After Pedestrian Trauma Accidents in the Pediatric Population.

The aim of the study is to determine whether overweight or obese children are at an increased risk for injury and adverse outcomes following pedestrian motor vehicle accidents. We performed a retrospective study of patients between the ages of 2 and 17 who were pedestrians injured in a collision with a motorized vehicle, presenting to a level 1 trauma center, between January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2021. Patients with admission weights falling above the 90th percentile of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's sex-specific growth charts were identified as overweight/obese, those below the cutoff were categorized as nonobese. Groups were compared regarding demographics, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score, and Abbreviated Injury Scale by body region of injury. Outcome measures included hospital admission, length of hospital stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ICU length of stay, and mortality. Of the 306 patients included, 72 (23.5%) were overweight/obese and 234 (76.5%) were nonobese. The mean Injury Severity Score scores were higher among overweight/obese patients (5.37 vs 8.74, P = 0.008). Overweight/obese children were more likely to sustain severe abdominal injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale ≥ 3) (12.2% vs 5.1%; odds ratio [OR], 2.64; 95% CI, 1.07-6.56; P = 0.030), be admitted to the hospital (94.5% vs 74.3%; OR, 12.07; 95% CI, 2.87-50.72; P < 0.001), require ICU admission (31.0% vs 20.0%, OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.03-3.36; P = 0.036), and require a longer ICU stay (0.9 vs 0.4 days, P = 0.014) compared with nonobese patients. Obese and overweight children are at increased risk for higher injury severity scores, severe abdominal injuries, and ICU admission after pedestrian motor vehicle accidents.