Mean Baseline Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Research Articles

An “Inclisiran First” Strategy vs Usual Care in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

BackgroundMost patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease fail to achieve guideline-directed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Twice-yearly inclisiran lowers LDL-C by ∼50% when added to statins. ObjectivesThis study evaluated the effectiveness of an “inclisiran first” implementation strategy (adding inclisiran immediately upon failure to reach LDL-C <70 mg/dL despite receiving maximally tolerated statins) vs representative usual care in U.S. patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. MethodsVICTORION-INITIATE, a prospective, pragmatically designed trial, randomized patients 1:1 to inclisiran (284 mg at days 0, 90, and 270) plus usual care (lipid management at treating physician’s discretion) vs usual care alone. Primary endpoints were percentage change in LDL-C from baseline and statin discontinuation rates. ResultsWe randomized 450 patients (30.9% women, 12.4% Black, 15.3% Hispanic); mean baseline LDL-C was 97.4 mg/dL. The “inclisiran first” strategy led to significantly greater reductions in LDL-C from baseline to day 330 vs usual care (60.0% vs 7.0%; P < 0.001). Statin discontinuation rates with “inclisiran first” (6.0%) were noninferior vs usual care (16.7%). More “inclisiran first” patients achieved LDL-C goals vs usual care (<70 mg/dL: 81.8% vs 22.2%; <55 mg/dL: 71.6% vs 8.9%; P < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and serious TEAE rates compared similarly between treatment strategies (62.8% vs 53.7% and 11.5% vs 13.4%, respectively). Injection-site TEAEs and TEAEs causing treatment withdrawal occurred more commonly with “inclisiran first” than usual care (10.3% vs 0.0% and 2.6% vs 0.0%, respectively). ConclusionsAn “inclisiran first” implementation strategy led to greater LDL-C lowering compared with usual care without discouraging statin use or raising new safety concerns. (A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of an “Inclisiran First” Implementation Strategy to Usual Care on LDL Cholesterol [LDL-C] in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and Elevated LDL-C [≥70 mg/dL] Despite Receiving Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy [VICTORION-INITIATE]; NCT04929249)

Abstract 16180: The Adherence and LDL-C Lowering Effect of Inclisiran Among Patients Who Received Treatment at Outpatient Clinics

Introduction: Inclisiran is a novel small interfering RNA (siRNA) indicated as an adjunct to diet and maximally tolerated statin to lower LDL-C among adults with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) in the US. It is administered subcutaneously initially, again at 3 months, and then every six months by an HCP. Subsequent doses may be administered within three months after the scheduled dose without restarting a new dose schedule. Metro Infusion Center (MIC) is one of the largest infusion centers across the US with over 200 centers in 38 states and has clinician oversight over each administration. Hypothesis: To describe the real-world adherence to inclisiran and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels associated with inclisiran use at MICs. Methods: Patient charts for those who initiated inclisiran from March 1, 2022 to November 31, 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographics and clinical characteristics at initiation were collected and patients were followed until May 2023 for the current analysis. The study outcomes included the proportion of eligible patients who received the 2 nd or 3 rd dose and the percent change in LDL-C levels from baseline to the latest available data. Results: A total of 562 patients were included in the analysis from 107 different MICs in over 21 states. Mean (SD) age was 70.6 (9.6) years; 51% were female. The majority of patients (80%) were covered by Medicare. 492 (88%) had a history of ASCVD and 60 (11%) had HeFH. Mean (SD) baseline LDL-C was 147.6 (59.9) mg/dl. Of the 562 patients initiated inclisiran, 531 (95%) received their 2 nd dose, and 91% received the 2 nd dose within ±7 days of the schedule. There were 233 patients eligible to receive a 3 rd dose, 196 (84%) of them had received the 3 rd dose. Among 274 patients who had the LDL-C measured after inclisiran initiation, the average LDL-C reduction from baseline was 46.3%. On average, the first LDL-C measurement was taken at 3 months after receiving at least one dose of Inclisiran. Conclusions: These real-world data demonstrate high adherence to inclisiran with LDL-C reductions of 46.3% at 3 months. This finding was consistent with the ORION clinical development program.

The Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Evinacumab in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

BackgroundHomozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is characterized by early-onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease due to the high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) burden. Patients with null-null low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) variants respond poorly, if at all, to statins and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, which act by upregulating LDLR expression. The 24-week double-blind treatment period (DBTP) of the phase 3 ELIPSE HoFH (Evinacumab Lipid Studies in Patients with Homozygous Familial hypercholesterolemia; NCT03399786) study demonstrated significant LDL-C reductions in patients with HoFH; LDL-C reductions were also observed in those with null-null LDLR mutations. ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to evaluate longer-term efficacy and safety of evinacumab in patients with HoFH from the ELIPSE HoFH study. MethodsPatients with HoFH on stable lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) ± lipoprotein apheresis and screening LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL who completed the DBTP entered the 24-week open-label treatment period (OLTP) and received intravenous evinacumab 15 mg/kg every 4 weeks. OLTP results were summarized descriptively. ResultsA total of 64 patients completed the DBTP and received open-label evinacumab. Despite multiple LLTs, the mean baseline LDL-C at DBTP entry was 250.5 ± 162.3 mg/dL. From baseline to week 48 (end of OLTP), evinacumab reduced mean LDL-C by 46.3% (mean reduction, 134.3 ± 117.3 mg/dL), with similar mean LDL-C reductions for patients with null-null (47.2%) and non-null variants (45.9%). Adverse events occurred in 47 (73.4%) patients; 4 (6.3%) patients experienced adverse events considered evinacumab-related (drug hypersensitivity, infusion-related reaction and asthenia, generalized pruritis, and muscle spasms). ConclusionsIn patients with HoFH, evinacumab demonstrated substantial and sustained LDL-C reduction regardless of LDLR function, and was generally well tolerated.

Long-term efficacy and safety of lerodalcibep in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: the LIBerate-HeFH trial.

Lerodalcibep, a novel small recombinant fusion protein of a PCSK9-binding domain (adnectin) and human serum albumin demonstrated highly effective low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction with monthly 300 mg in 1.2 ml SC dosing in Phase 2. In this global Phase 3 trial, the safety and efficacy of lerodalcibep was evaluated in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HeFH) patients requiring additional LDL-C lowering. Patients were randomized 2:1 to monthly SC injections of either lerodalcibep 300 mg or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoints were the percent change from baseline in LDL-C at Week 24 and the mean of Weeks 22 and 24. In 478 randomized subjects [mean age (range); 53 (18-80) years, 51.7% female, mean (SD) baseline LDL-C 3.88 (1.66) mmol/L] lerodalcibep reduced LDL-C, compared to placebo by an absolute amount of 2.08 (0.11) mmol/L [LS mean(SE); 95% CI -2.30 to -1.87] with a percentage difference of -58.61 (3.25)% at Week 24 and by 2.28 (0.10) mmol/L (95% CI -2.47 to -2.09) with a percentage difference of -65.0 (2.87)% at the mean of Weeks 22 and 24 (P < 0.0001 for all). With lerodalcibep, 68% of subjects achieved both a reduction in LDL-C ≥ 50% and the recommended ESC LDL-C targets during the study. Except for mild injection site reactions, treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between lerodalcibep and placebo. Lerodalcibep, a novel anti-PCSK9 small binding protein dosed monthly as an alternative to monoclonal antibodies, significantly reduced LDL-C in subjects with HeFH with a safety profile similar to placebo.

Clinical Benefit of Bempedoic Acid in Randomized Clinical Trials

Bempedoic acid is a selective inhibitor of the adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase that reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) levels by 17% to 28%. Although the Evaluation of Major Cardiovascular Events in Patients With, or at High Risk for, Cardiovascular Disease Who Are Statin Intolerant Treated With Bempedoic Acid (CLEAR-OUTCOMES) trials demonstrated the efficacy on cardiovascular outcomes there is a controversy related to the possible net clinical benefit. Thereafter, we performed an intention-to-treat meta-analysis in line with recommendations from the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary outcome of the metanalysis was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined by each study protocol. Secondary outcomes for the analyses were myocardial infarction, stroke, myocardial revascularization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. Results of 4 clinical trials evaluated contained a total of 17,324 patients; 9,236 received bempedoic acid for a median of 46.6months. The mean baseline LDLc was 129.4 (22.8)mg/100ml and treatment was associated with a mean LDLc reduction of 26.0 (12.6)mg/100ml. Treatment with bempedoic acid significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 to 0.96), myocardial infarction (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.89) and myocardial revascularization (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.92); the crude incidence of stroke, cardiovascular or all-cause mortality were lower in patients in the bempedoic acid groups although no significant risk reduction was observed. No heterogeneity was observed in any of the end points. In conclusion, the metanalysis of the 4 clinical trials currently available with bempedoic acid provides reliable evidence of its clinical benefit with no signs of heterogeneity or harm.

Genetic Identification of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia by Long-Read Sequencing Among Patients With Clinically Diagnosed Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by extremely elevated plasma LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and accelerated atherosclerosis. Accurate identification of patients with HoFH is essential as they may be eligible for specialized treatments. We hypothesized that a subset of patients with clinically diagnosed heterozygous FH (HeFH) may in fact have HoFH, and this could be identified by genetic diagnosis. We recruited patients with a clinical diagnosis of HeFH based on a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score ≥6 and no secondary cause of hypercholesterolemia. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing of the LDLR, APOB, PCSK9, and LDLRAP1 genes, followed by long-read sequencing of the LDLR gene in patients with >1 pathogenic LDLR variant. We examined lipid levels and cardiovascular events. Among 705 patients with clinically diagnosed HeFH, we identified a single pathogenic variant in 300 (42.6%) and >1 pathogenic variant in the LDLR gene in 11 patients (1.6%). We established a genetic diagnosis of HoFH in 6 (0.9%) patients (3 true homozygotes and 3 compound heterozygotes). The mean baseline LDL-C and prevalence of premature cardiovascular disease of patients with genetically identified HoFH was significantly higher than patients with HeFH. In a cohort of patients with clinically diagnosed HeFH, genetic testing including long-read sequencing revealed that 0.9% had HoFH. These patients tended to have a more severe clinical phenotype. Genetic testing of patients with clinical FH may identify patients with HoFH that had eluded clinical diagnosis.

Lipid lowering with inclisiran: a real-world single-centre experience

ObjectiveThe reduction in circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) is the primary aim of lipid-lowering therapies as a method of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Inclisiran is a new and potent...

Association of statin therapy with progression of carotid arterial stiffness: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA).

Arterial stiffness progresses with age and is a predictor of adverse cardiovascular disease events. Studies examining associations of statin therapy with arterial stiffness have yielded mixed results. Associations between the duration and intensity of statin therapy and arterial stiffness have not been studied in a prospective multiethnic cohort. MESA participants (n = 1242) with statin medication use data at each exam (1-5) and who had undergone B-mode carotid ultrasound at baseline and at Exam 5 after (mean ± [SD]) 9.4 ± 0.5 years were analyzed. Carotid arterial stiffness was measured using the distensibility coefficient (DC) and Young's elastic modulus (YEM). Linear regression models were used to evaluate associations between DC and YEM and statin treatment duration and intensity. At baseline, participants were 66.5 ± 8.1 years old, 41% female, 36% White, 30% African American, 14% Chinese American, and 20% Hispanic. The mean baseline low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was 149.5 ± 14.5 mg/dL. After adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, and CVD risk factors, the percent changes in DC and YEM were found to not be significantly different in individuals on statin therapy at any combination of visits (1-4) compared to participants never on statin therapy (all p > 0.32). There were also no differences in the percent change in DC and YEM based on statin therapy intensity by quartile (all p > 0.14) over the 10-year follow-up period. Based on the aforementioned results, statin therapy was not associated with changes in carotid artery stiffness over nearly a decade of follow-up regardless of therapy duration or intensity.

Abstract 10921: Efficacy and Safety of Ongericimab in Chinese Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Background: Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder with extremely high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels that contributes to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and death, even in adolescent. Ongericimab, a monoclonal antibody against human proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), inhibits PCSK9-mediated degradation of LDL receptor (LDLR), and reduces LDL-C by 58.3-66.5% in Chinese patients with hyperlipidemia. Due to the high genetic heterogeneity of HoFH, the LDL-C lowering effect of Ongericimab remains elusive in Chinese population. This is the first study to assess the efficacy and safety of anti-PCSK9 antibody in Chinese patients with HoFH. Methods: This is a single arm, open-label phase 2 study. 31 patients (aged ≥12 years) with HoFH diagnosed by clinical or genetic criteria, on stable lipid-lowering therapies for ≥4 weeks, were enrolled to receive subcutaneous Ongericimab 450 mg every 4 weeks for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was percentage change in LDL-C from baseline at week 12. Results: At the time of this interim analysis, 30 out of 31 patients completed 12 weeks treatment. All patients were on statins (77.4% on high intensity statin) and the mean (SD) baseline LDL-C was 8.6 (3.1) mmol/L. The least squares mean percentage change in LDL-C from baseline was -12.6% (95% CI: -19.7%, -5.6%; p=0.001) at week 12. Further analysis based on residual LDLR activity, the mean (SD) LDL-C change from baseline was -21.7 (28.0)% in 14 patients with defective LDLR (at least one defective allele) and -1.4 (9.6)% in 7 patients with negative LDLR (at least one negative allele), respectively (Figure 1). No serious side effects were reported. Conclusion: Ongericimab was well tolerated and significantly reduced LDL-C levels in Chinese patients with HoFH. Patients with defective LDLR demonstrated better response than those with negative LDLR.

Abstract 13821: Genetic Identification of Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia by Long-Read Sequencing Among Patients With Clinically Diagnosed Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Background: Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by extremely elevated plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and accelerated atherosclerosis. Accurate identification of patients with HoFH is essential as they may be eligible for specialized treatments. The objective of this study was to identify and characterize patients with HoFH among patients with clinically diagnosed heterozygous FH (HeFH). Methods: We studied patients from the British Columbia FH Registry with a Dutch Lipid Clinic Network score ≥6 and no secondary cause of hypercholesterolemia. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing of the LDLR , APOB , PCSK9 and LDLRAP1 genes. Long-read sequencing of the LDLR gene was subsequently done for patients with &gt;1 pathogenic LDLR variant to determine haplotypes. We examined lipid levels and cardiovascular events (unstable angina, myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization). Results: Among 705 patients with clinically diagnosed HeFH, we identified a single pathogenic variant in 300 (42.6%) patients and &gt;1 pathogenic variant in the LDLR gene in 11 (1.6%) patients. We established a genetic diagnosis of HoFH in 6 (0.9%) patients (3 true homozygous and 3 compound heterozygous in trans). The mean baseline LDL-C of genetically identified HoFH patients was significantly higher than those with 1 variant. The prevalence of premature cardiovascular disease was numerically greater in the genetically identified HoFH group (29.4% vs 18.0%, p=0.2). Conclusions: In a cohort of patients with clinically diagnosed HeFH, genetic testing by long-read sequencing revealed that 0.9% had HoFH. These patients tended to have a more severe phenotype. Genetic testing of patients with clinical FH may identify patients with HoFH that had eluded clinical diagnosis.

Early Achievement of LDL-C Target in Post ACS and Cardiovascular Outcomes

Background: Risk factor control may be an essential role to reduce subsequent major cardiovascular events in post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients especially low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Whether early LDL-C achievement in post ACS can provide additional cardiovascular benefit, the evidence is scared. Objective: To determine the impact of early achievement of LDL-C target and cardiovascular outcome in post ACS. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with diagnosis of ACS who had been admitted at Ramathibodi Hospital Bangkok, Thailand between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017 were enrolled. Early LDL-C achieved was defined by LDL-C level below 70 mg/dL or at least 50% reduction from baseline within 12 weeks. Composite outcomes of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and re-revascularization major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) had been followed for one year. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to analyze the impact of the early LDL-C achievement. Results: Of the 352 patients studied, mean baseline LDL-C was 119±45 mg/dL. There were 117 patients (33.2%) in the early LDL-C achieved group and 235 patients (66.8%) in LDL-C non-achieved group at 12 weeks. During the 1-year follow-up, MACE occurred in 25 patients (7.2%) with three patients (2.6%) in early LDL-C achieved group and 22 patients (9.4%) in LDL-C non-achieved group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model showed that the early LDL-C achieved group independently associated with reduction of MACE (HR 0.286, 95% CI 0.085 to 0.960, p=0.043). Conclusion: Among post ACS patients who are very high-risk of further cardiovascular event especially within the first year, not only LDL-C target is to be considered but the earlier LDL-C achievement is also associated with better cardiovascular prognosis. To provide the effective LDL-C control, early LDL-C achievement is necessary. Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome, Low density lipoprotein cholesterol

Real-World Efficacy of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors (PCSK9i) in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia Patients Referred for Lipoprotein Apheresis.

BackgroundA small proportion of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) patients can adequately control this condition, although achieving the recommended targets for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels remains a challenge. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors (PCSK9i) are new and potent lipid-lowering drugs. However, there is scarce literature on real-world data about their use in patients with FH.Material/MethodsWe examined the reduction in LDL-c levels from the baseline, after PCSK9i initiation in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia patients referred for lipoprotein apheresis in our regional lipid clinic. The study was conducted from March 2018 to September 2019, the period immediately after PCSK9i reimbursement was available in France. PCSK9i was added on top of the patients’ maximal tolerated lipid-lowering regimens.ResultsThe study had 123 patients with heterozygous FH. The mean age of the patients was 59±11 years. The mean baseline LDL-c for all the participants was 277±78 mg/dl. It was 283±81 mg/dl in the PCSK9i monotherapy group (n=83), 247±68 mg/dl in the PCSK9i plus ezetimibe group (n=12), and 264±78 mg/dl in the PCSK9i plus statin and ezetimibe group (n=28). The mean decrease observed in the LDL-c level from baseline was 136±70 mg/dl (n=123), 125±60 mg/dl (n=83), 103±77 mg/dl (n=12), and 175±70 mg/dl (n=28), respectively.ConclusionsAn overall reduction of 49.1% from the baseline LDL-c was observed in the heterozygous FH population after PCSK9i initiation in a real-world experience. The group treated with PCSK9i ezetimibe plus statin showed further reduction of their LDL-c levels with a better responder rate, achieving the target 50% reduction in LDL-c from the baseline.

Effect of Patient Financial Incentives on Statin Adherence and Lipid Control

Financial incentives can improve medication adherence and cardiovascular disease risk, but the optimal design to promote sustained adherence after incentives are discontinued is unknown. To determine whether 6-month interventions involving different financial incentives to encourage statin adherence reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels from baseline to 12 months. This 4-group, randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 2013 to July 2018 among several large US insurer or employer populations and the University of Pennsylvania Health System. The study population included adults with elevated risk of cardiovascular disease, suboptimal LDL-C control, and evidence of imperfect adherence to statin medication. Data analysis was performed from July 2017 to June 2019. The interventions lasted 6 months during which all participants received daily medication reminders and an electronic pill bottle. Statin adherence was measured by opening the bottle. For participants randomized to the 3 intervention groups, adherence was rewarded with financial incentives. The sweepstakes group involved incentives for daily adherence. In the deadline sweepstakes group, incentives were reduced if participants were adherent only after a reminder. The sweepstakes plus deposit contract group split incentives between daily adherence and a monthly deposit reduced for each day of nonadherence. The primary outcome was change in LDL-C level from baseline to 12 months. Among 805 participants randomized (199 in the simple daily sweepstakes group, 204 in the deadline sweepstakes group, 201 in the sweepstakes plus deposit contract group, and 201 in the control group), the mean (SD) age was 58.5 (10.3) years; 519 participants (64.5%) were women, 514 (63.9%) had diabetes, and 273 (33.9%) had cardiovascular disease. The mean (SD) baseline LDL-C level was 143.2 (42.5) mg/dL. Measured adherence at 6 months (defined as the proportion of 180 days with electronic pill bottle opening) in the control group (0.69; 95% CI, 0.66-0.72) was lower than that in the simple sweepstakes group (0.84; 95% CI, 0.81-0.87), the deadline sweepstakes group (0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89), and the sweepstakes plus deposit contract group (0.87; 95% CI, 0.84-0.90) (P < .001 for each incentive group vs control). LDL-C levels were measured for 636 participants at 12 months. Mean LDL-C level reductions from baseline to 12 months were 33.6 mg/dL (95% CI, 28.4-38.8 mg/dL) in the control group, 32.4 mg/dL (95% CI, 27.3-37.6 mg/dL) in the sweepstakes group, 33.2 mg/dL (95% CI, 28.1-38.3 mg/dL) in the deadline sweepstakes group, and 36.5 mg/dL (95% CI, 31.3-41.7 mg/dL) in the sweepstakes plus deposit contract group (adjusted P > .99 for each incentive group vs control). Compared with the control group, different financial incentives improved measured statin adherence but not LDL-C levels. This result points to the importance of directly measuring health outcomes, rather than simply adherence, in trials aimed at improving health behaviors. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01798784.

Evinacumab for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

BackgroundHomozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is characterized by premature cardiovascular disease caused by markedly elevated levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. This disorder is associated with genetic variants that result in virtually absent (null–null) or impaired (non-null) LDL-receptor activity. Loss-of-function variants in the gene encoding angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) are associated with hypolipidemia and protection against atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Evinacumab, a monoclonal antibody against ANGPTL3, has shown potential benefit in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.MethodsIn this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio 65 patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia who were receiving stable lipid-lowering therapy to receive an intravenous infusion of evinacumab (at a dose of 15 mg per kilogram of body weight) every 4 weeks or placebo. The primary outcome was the percent change from baseline in the LDL cholesterol level at week 24.ResultsThe mean baseline LDL cholesterol level in the two groups was 255.1 mg per deciliter, despite the receipt of maximum doses of background lipid-lowering therapy. At week 24, patients in the evinacumab group had a relative reduction from baseline in the LDL cholesterol level of 47.1%, as compared with an increase of 1.9% in the placebo group, for a between-group least-squares mean difference of –49.0 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], –65.0 to –33.1; P<0.001); the between-group least-squares mean absolute difference in the LDL cholesterol level was –132.1 mg per deciliter (95% CI, –175.3 to –88.9; P<0.001). The LDL cholesterol level was lower in the evinacumab group than in the placebo group in patients with null–null variants (–43.4% vs. +16.2%) and in those with non-null variants (–49.1% vs. –3.8%). Adverse events were similar in the two groups.ConclusionsIn patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia receiving maximum doses of lipid-lowering therapy, the reduction from baseline in the LDL cholesterol level in the evinacumab group, as compared with the small increase in the placebo group, resulted in a between-group difference of 49.0 percentage points at 24 weeks. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; ELIPSE HoFH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03399786.)

Association of Bempedoic Acid Administration With Atherogenic Lipid Levels in Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials of Patients With Hypercholesterolemia

Additional lipid-lowering therapy options are needed for patients who cannot achieve sufficient decreases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels using statins alone or for those who are statin intolerant. To conduct a pooled analysis of phase 3 randomized clinical trials of bempedoic acid vs placebo. This analysis pooled data from 4 double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trials conducted from 2016 to 2018. Patients were enrolled in North America and Europe. Eligibility criteria included hypercholesterolemia while receiving stable lipid-lowering therapy and high cardiovascular risk or hypercholesterolemia and statin intolerance. Patients were randomized 2:1 to bempedoic acid, 180 mg (n = 2425), or placebo (n = 1198) once daily for 12 to 52 weeks. Primary efficacy end point was percentage change from baseline in LDL-C level at week 12 in the intention-to-treat population. Patients were parsed into 2 groups according to enrollment criteria: (1) patients with hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) or with both and receiving statins and (2) patients with hypercholesterolemia who were statin intolerant receiving maximally tolerated statins. In this analysis of 3623 patients, the overall mean (SD) patient age was 65.5 (9.2) years (similar in both pools). Among patients with ASCVD or HeFH or both, the mean (SD) baseline LDL-C level was 107.6 (32.7) mg/dL. At week 12, the LDL-C level percentage change from baseline was -16.0% with bempedoic acid vs 1.8% with placebo (difference, -17.8%; 95% CI, -19.5% to -16.0%; P < .001). Patients with statin intolerance had a mean (SD) baseline LDL-C level of 144.4 (38.8) mg/dL. The percentage changes in LDL-C levels at week 12 were -23.0% in the bempedoic acid group and 1.5% in the placebo group (difference, -24.5%; 95% CI, -27.8% to -21.1%; P < .001). The decrease in LDL-C levels with bempedoic acid was sustained during long-term follow-up in both pools (patients with ASCVD or HeFH or both receiving a maximally tolerated statin, difference of -12.7% at week 52; patients with statin intolerance, difference of -22.2% at week 24). Decreases in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels were greater with bempedoic acid vs placebo. Treatment-emergent adverse events associated more frequently with bempedoic acid than with placebo included increased blood uric acid level (2.1% vs 0.5%), gout (1.4% vs 0.4%), decreased glomerular filtration rate (0.7% vs <0.1%), and increased levels of hepatic enzymes (2.8% vs 1.3%). Bempedoic acid added to maximally tolerated statins, including moderate- or high-intensity statins or no background statin, was associated with decreased LDL-C levels vs placebo in patients with hypercholesterolemia with an acceptable safety profile. As a nonstatin adjunct or statin alternative, bempedoic acid has potential for use in a broad spectrum of patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT02666664, NCT02991118, NCT03001076, and NCT02988115.

Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Adults With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: The ODYSSEY HoFH Trial

BackgroundHomozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is characterized by extremely elevated low-density lipoprotein–cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and early onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease despite treatment with conventional lipid-lowering treatment. ObjectivesThis study was designed to assess LDL-C reduction with the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab in adult patients with HoFH. MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 3 study evaluated efficacy and safety of alirocumab 150 mg every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent reduction from baseline in LDL-C versus placebo after 12 weeks of treatment. ResultsPatients (N = 69) were randomized 2:1 to alirocumab or placebo. At baseline, background lipid-lowering treatment included 67 patients receiving statin (59 patients on high-intensity statin); 50 patients on ezetimibe; 10 patients on lomitapide; and 10 patients undergoing apheresis. Mean baseline LDL-C was 259.6 mg/dl in the placebo group and 295.0 mg/dl in the alirocumab group. At week 12, the least squares mean difference in LDL-C percent change from baseline was −35.6% (alirocumab [−26.9%] vs. placebo [8.6%]; p < 0.0001). Reductions (least squares mean difference) in other atherogenic lipids at week 12 were: apolipoprotein B, −29.8%; non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, −32.9%; total cholesterol, −26.5%; and lipoprotein(a), −28.4% (all p < 0.0001). No serious adverse events, permanent treatment discontinuations, or deaths due to treatment-emergent adverse events were reported during the double-blind treatment period. ConclusionsIn the largest randomized controlled interventional trial in HoFH patients to date, alirocumab resulted in significant and clinically meaningful reductions in LDL-C at week 12. Alirocumab was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable to that of placebo. (Study in Participants With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia [HoFH] [ODYSSEY HoFH] NCT03156621.)

Systemic inflammation is associated with incident stroke and heart disease in East Asians

Systemic inflammation, reflected by increased plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen, is associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease, but its relevance for stroke types remains unclear. Moreover, evidence is limited in non-European populations. We investigated associations of CRP and fibrinogen with risks of incident major coronary events (MCE), ischemic stroke (IS) and intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in a cohort of Chinese adults. A nested case-control study within the prospective China Kadoorie Biobank included 1,508 incident MCE cases, 5,418 IS cases, 4,476 ICH cases, and 5,285 common controls, aged 30–79 years. High-sensitivity CRP and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were measured in baseline plasma samples from all participants, and fibrinogen in a subset (n = 9,380). Logistic regression yielded adjusted odds ratios (ORs) per SD higher usual levels of log-transformed CRP and fibrinogen. The overall mean (SD) baseline LDL-C was 91.6 mg/dL (24.0) and geometric mean (95% CI) CRP and fibrinogen were 0.90 mg/L (0.87–0.93) and 3.01 g/L (2.98–3.03), respectively. There were approximately log-linear positive associations of CRP with each outcome, which persisted after adjustment for LDL-C and other risk factors, with adjusted ORs (95% CI) per SD higher CRP of 1.67 (1.44–1.94) for MCE and 1.22 (1.10–1.36) for both IS and ICH. No associations of fibrinogen with MCE, IS, or ICH were identified. Adding CRP to prediction models based on established risk factors improved model fit for each of MCE, IS, and ICH, with small improvements in C-statistic and correct reclassification of controls to lower risk groups. Among Chinese adults, who have low mean LDL-C, CRP, but not fibrinogen, was independently associated with increased risks of MCE and stroke.

Demographic And Clinical Characteristics Of Patients Prescribed Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/kexin Type 9 Inhibitor Therapy And Patients Whose Current Lipid-Lowering Therapy Was Modified.

PurposeOur objective was to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of real-world patients in the US with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) whose lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) ─ both proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor and non-PCSK9 inhibitor ─ was actively modified.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used linked laboratory (Prognos), pharmacy (IMS Formulary Impact Analyzer), and medical claims (IQVIA Dx/LRx or PharMetrics Plus) data. PCSK9 inhibitor–prescribed patients with LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL (multiply by 0.02586 for mmol/L) at the time of prescription were matched by LDL-C test date to patients whose non-PCSK9 inhibitor therapy was modified by intensifying statin therapy, switching statins without intensification, or augmenting with ezetimibe (N=12,345 in each cohort). Baseline demographics, use of LLT, LDL-C values, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) diagnoses and cardiovascular comorbidities, and occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were assessed during the 2-year pre-index period.ResultsMean age was 66.2 years in the PCSK9 inhibitor cohort and 64.1 years in the cohort whose LLT regimen was otherwise modified. Respectively, mean baseline LDL-C values were 150 and 121 mg/dL; 60.3% and 39.0% of patients had ASCVD diagnoses, and 9.6% and 5.1% had experienced a recent MACE. Prevalence of ASCVD diagnoses in the PCSK9 inhibitor and modified non-PCSK9 inhibitor cohorts, respectively, was 15.5% vs 9.1% for acute coronary syndrome, 20.7% vs 8.7% for coronary revascularization, and 22.2% vs 5.1% for possible familial hypercholesterolemia. In addition, 19.8% of patients in the PCSK9 inhibitor cohort were receiving both statins and ezetimibe vs 5.0% in the modified LLT cohort.ConclusionPhysicians are prescribing PCSK9 inhibitor therapy to patients with markedly elevated LDL-C levels who also have comorbid risk factors for adverse cardiovascular events. These results may be of interest to payers and policymakers involved in devising access strategies for PCSK9 inhibitors.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Evolocumab in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia

BackgroundEvolocumab and other anti-PCSK9 antibodies reduced adverse cardiovascular outcomes in clinical trials of high-risk patients over <3 years median treatment duration. ObjectivesThe OSLER-1 trial (Open Label Study of Long Term Evaluation Against LDL-C Trial) evaluated longer-term effects of evolocumab during open-label hypercholesterolemia treatment for up to 5 years. MethodsPatients randomized to standard of care (SOC) or evolocumab 420 mg monthly (evolocumab + SOC) for year 1. After year 1, patients could enter the all-evolocumab period and receive evolocumab + SOC for an additional 4 years. The authors analyzed the persistence of lipid effects and exposure-dependent safety focusing on yearly rates of adverse events (AEs) and anti-drug antibodies over 4.951 patient-years of observation. ResultsA total of 1,255 patients (safety analysis population) randomized into the year 1 SOC-controlled period and received ≥1 evolocumab dose (mean ± SD age 57 ± 12 years; 53% female). A total of 1,151 patients (efficacy analysis population) progressed to the all-evolocumab period (year 2 and beyond). Evolocumab + SOC persistently lowered mean ± SE low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 56% ± 0.6% (n = 1,071), 57% ± 0.8% (n = 1,001), 56% ± 0.8% (n = 943), and 56% ± 0.8% (n = 803) after approximately 2, 3, 4, and 5 years, respectively, from randomization. Mean baseline LDL-C decreased from 140 to 61 mg/dl on treatment. Yearly serious AE rates during evolocumab + SOC ranged from 6.9% to 7.9%, comparable to the 6.8% rate in SOC patients during year 1. Evolocumab discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 5.7% of patients. Two SOC and 2 evolocumab + SOC patients developed new, transient, binding anti-drug antibodies; no neutralizing antibodies were observed. ConclusionsThe OSLER-1 trial demonstrated consistently excellent LDL-C–lowering efficacy, tolerance, and safety of evolocumab, with no neutralizing antibodies detected, throughout the longest-duration study of a PCSK9 inhibitor reported to date. (Open Label Study of Long Term Evaluation Against LDL-C Trial [OSLER-1]; NCT01439880)

Real-World Outcomes with Lomitapide Use in Paediatric Patients with Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolaemia.

IntroductionHomozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (HoFH) is a rare, autosomal disease affecting the clearance of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from circulation, and leading to early-onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Treatment consists mainly of statins, lipoprotein apheresis (LA) and, more recently, the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein inhibitor lomitapide. Lomitapide is not licensed for use in children, but has been made available through an expanded access programme or on a named patient basis.MethodsThis case series includes 11 HoFH patients in 10 different centres in eight countries, less than 18 years of age (mean 11.6 ± 1.1 years, 64% male), with signs of ASCVD, and who have received treatment with lomitapide (mean dose 24.5 ± 4.3 mg/day; mean exposure 20.0 ± 2.9 months). Background lipid-lowering therapy was given according to local protocols. Lomitapide was commenced with a stepwise dose escalation from 2.5 mg or 5 mg/day; dietary advice and vitamin supplements were provided as per the product label for adults. Laboratory analysis was conducted as part of regular clinical care.ResultsIn the 11 cases, mean baseline LDL-C was 419 ± 74.6 mg/dL and was markedly reduced by lomitapide to a nadir of 176.7 ± 46.3 mg/dL (58.4 ± 6.8% decrease). Six patients achieved recommended target levels for children below 135 mg/dL, five of whom had LA frequency reduced. In one case, LDL-C levels were close to target when lomitapide was started but remained stable despite 75% reduction in LA frequency (from twice weekly to biweekly). Adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal in nature, occurred early in the treatment course and were well managed. Three patients with excursions in liver function tests were managed chiefly without intervention; two patients had decreases in lomitapide dose.ConclusionsLomitapide demonstrated promising effectiveness in paediatric HoFH patients. Adverse events were manageable, and the clinical profile of the drug is apparently similar to that in adult patients.FundingAmryt Pharma.