Mean Anterior Tibial Translation Research Articles

Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity assessment of a novel high-frequency sensor device for anterior tibial translation measurement in loaded and unloaded condition: an exploratory cross-sectional study

BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and manual tests remain the standard for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. Furthermore, the passive knee displacement, also described as anterior tibial translation (ATT), is used in order to make decisions about surgery or to assess rehabilitation outcomes. Unfortunately, these manual tests are limited to passive situations, and their application to assess knee stability in loaded, weight-bearing positions are missing. Therefore, a new device with high-performance sensors and a new sensor setting was developed. The aim of this exploratory cross-sectional study was to assess the test-retest reliability of this new device in a first step and the concurrent validity in a second step.MethodsA total of 20 healthy volunteers were measured. Measurement consistency of the new device was assessed on the basis of reliability during Lachman test setting and in loaded position by artificial knee perturbation in a test-retest procedure. In a second step, the concurrent validity was evaluated with the Lachmeter® as a reference instrument. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimal detectable change (MDC) and Bland-Altman analysis were evaluated to assess the quality criteria.ResultsThe measurements with the new device during the Lachman test provided a mean ATT of 5.46±2.22mm. The SEM ranged from 0.60 to 0.69mm resulting in an MDC between 1.67 and 1.93mm for the new device. In the loaded test situation, the mean ATT was 2.11±1.20mm, with test-retest reliability also showing good correlation (r>0.83). The comparison of the two measurement methods with an ICC of (r>0.89) showed good correlation, which also underlines the reasonable agreement of the Bland-Altman analysis.ConclusionsThe evaluation of the test-retest reliability of the new device during the knee stability testing in passive situation as well as in a functional, loaded situation presented good reliability. In addition, the new device demonstrated good agreement with the reference device and therefore good validity. Furthermore, the quality criteria demonstrated the ability of the new device to detect the cut-off value (3-5mm) described in the literature for the diagnosis of ACL-deficient knees, which underlines the clinical relevance of this new device as a reliable and valid tool.

Assessment of knee instability in ACL-injured knees using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT): a novel protocol and preliminary results.

To propose a protocol for assessing knee instability in ACL-injured knees using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT). We enrolled five patients with unilateral chronic ACL tears referred for WBCT. Bilateral images were obtained in four positions: bilateral knee extension, bilateral knee flexion, single-leg stance with knee flexion and external rotation, and single-leg stance with knee flexion and internal rotation. The radiation dose, time for protocol acquisition, and patients' tolerance of the procedure were recorded. A blinded senior radiologist assessed image quality and measured the anterior tibial translation (ATT) and femorotibial rotation (FTR) angle in the ACL-deficient and contralateral healthy knee. All five patients were male, aged 23-30 years old. The protocol resulted in a 16.2 mGy radiation dose and a 15-min acquisition time. The procedure was well-tolerated, and patient positioning was uneventful, providing good-quality images. In all positions, the mean ATT and FTR were greater in ACL-deficient knees versus the healthy knee, with more pronounced differences observed in the bilateral knee flexion position. Mean lateral ATT in the flexion position was 9.1±2.8 cm in the ACL-injured knees versus 4.0±1.8 cm in non-injured knees, and mean FTR angle in the bilateral flexion position was 13.5°±7.7 and 8.6°±4.6 in the injured and non-injured knees, respectively. Our protocol quantitatively assesses knee instability with WBCT, measuring ATT and FTR in diverse knee positions. It employs reasonable radiation, is fast, well-tolerated, and yields high-quality images. Preliminary findings suggest ACL-deficient knees show elevated ATT and FTR, particularly in the 30° flexion position.

Evaluation of the short-term outcomes of anatomic ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft in patients with generalized joint laxity: A retrospective case-control study.

The outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in patients with generalized joint laxity (GJL) are not clearly understood. In this study, we compared the outcomes of ACLR with quadruple hamstring autograft between GJL and non-GJL patients. In a retrospective case-control study, 36 patients with GJL, according to the Beighton and Horan Joint Mobility Index, who underwent ACLR surgery, were included. Forty-four group-matched non-GJL patients were included in the control group. The mean follow-up of the patients was 20.65 ± 6.93‏ months. The outcomes of ACLR were evaluated by the Lachman test, pivot shift test, anterior tibial translation and KT-1000 side-to-side difference, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scale. The results of the Lachman and pivot shift test were not significantly different between the GJL and non-GJL patients (P = 0.67 and P = 0.27, respectively). The mean anterior tibial translation was 7.06 ± 1.41mm in the GJL group and 6.11 ± 1.53mm in the non-GJL group (P = 0.006). The mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference was 2.25 ± 1.31mm in the case and 2.5 ± 1.44mm in the control group (P = 0.42). The mean IKDC score of the patients was not significantly different between the GJL and non-GJL groups (66.1 ± 20.6 vs. 69.9 ± 16.1, P = 0.35). ACLR failure occurred in 2 (5.5%) patients of the GJL group and no patients of the control group (P = 0.21). The present findings suggest ACLR with quadruple hamstring autograft as an adequate treatment for GJL patients, at least in short-term follow-up.

Failure rate analysis and clinical outcomes of two different femoral tunnel positions using anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

AimTo analyze two different femoral tunnel positions and to evaluate their correlation with clinical, functional outcomes and surgical revision rate in patients who underwent primary arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with anteromedial (AM) portal technique. MethodsFrom January 2015 to October 2018, we recruited 244 patients that underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction, using four strand-semitendinosus graft and AM portal technique for femoral tunnel placement. Patients were divided into two groups based on the different femoral tunnel positions: 117 patients of group A had ACL footprint center femoral tunnel position compared with 127 patients of group B, with femoral tunnel placement close to the AM bundle footprint. Preoperatively and at last follow up, all patients were assessed subjectively by Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, while Lachman, Pivot-shift, and KT-1000 tests were performed to evaluate knee joint stability. ResultsGroup B patients showed significantly better results in Lysholm, objective, and subjective IKDC scores compared with patients of group A (P < 0.001). A significantly higher surgical failure rate was found in group A than in group B (10.26% vs. 2.3%; P < 0.001). A higher anterior knee laxity was recorded in patients of group A than in patients of group B (1.9 ± 1.1 vs. 1.3 ± 1 mm; P < 0.001); a reduction in mean anterior tibial translation from preoperative to final follow up was found in group B compared with group A (3.5 ± 1.2 vs. 2.7 ± 1.1 mm; P < 0.001). No significant differences in the Tegner scale were found between the two groups. ConclusionACL reconstruction performed using the AM portal technique showed better and more satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes associated with a lower failure rate when the femoral tunnel had been placed more eccentrically in the footprint, in the AM bundle center position.

Knee laxity and functional knee outcome after contralateral ACLR are comparable to those after primary ACLR

PurposeTo evaluate and compare knee laxity and functional knee outcome between primary and contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.MethodsPatients who underwent primary and subsequent contralateral ACL reconstruction (ACLR) at Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, from 2001 to 2017, were identified in our local database. The inclusion criteria were: the same patients who underwent primary and contralateral hamstring tendon or bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft ACLR and no associated ligament injuries. The KT-1000 arthrometer, with an anterior tibial load of 134 N, was used to evaluate knee laxity preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up.ResultsA total of 326 patients with isolated primary and contralateral ACLR met the inclusion criteria (47.9% males; mean age at primary ACLR 23.9 ± 9.4 years and contralateral ACLR 27.9 ± 10.1 years). The arthrometric laxity measurements were available for primary and contralateral ACLR for 226 patients. The mean preoperative and postoperative anterior tibial translation (ATT), as well as the mean ATT reduction from preoperatively to postoperatively, did not differ significantly between primary and contralateral ACLR. The KOOS was available for primary and contralateral ACLR for 256 patients. No significant differences were found preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up between primary and contralateral ACLR for any of the five KOOS subscales.ConclusionThe findings in this study showed that anterior knee laxity and functional knee outcome after contralateral ACLR are comparable to those after primary ACLR. It is important for clinicians to counsel patients about their expectations after contralateral ACLR. This study shows that the results after contralateral ACLR in terms of knee laxity and functional knee outcome are predictable and likely to be comparable to those after primary ACLR.Level of evidenceLevel III.

The Anterolateral Structure of the Knee Does Not Affect Anterior and Dynamic Rotatory Stability in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Quantitative Evaluation With the Electromagnetic Measurement System

Background: The biomechanical function of the anterolateral structure (ALS), which includes the anterolateral joint capsule and anterolateral ligament (ALL), remains a topic of debate. Hypothesis: The ALS contributes to knee joint stability during the Lachman test and the pivot-shift test in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)–deficient knees. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fourteen fresh-frozen hemipelvis lower limbs were used. For 7 specimens, the anterior one-third of the ALS and the residual ALS were cut intra-articularly with a radiofrequency device. Subsequently, the ACL was cut arthroscopically. For the other 7 specimens, the ACL was cut first, followed by the anterior one-third of the ALS and the residual ALS intra-articularly. During the procedures, the iliotibial band (ITB) was kept intact. At each condition, the anterior tibial translation (ATT) during the manual Lachman test and the acceleration of posterior tibial translation (APT) and the posterior tibial translation (PTT) during the manual pivot-shift test were measured quantitatively with an electromagnetic measurement system. The mean values of those parameters were compared among 6 groups (ACL intact, one-third ALS cut, all ALS cut, ACL cut, ACL/one-third ALS cut, and ACL/all ALS cut). Results: The mean ATTs during the Lachman test and the mean APTs and PTTs in the ACL-cut conditions (ACL cut, ACL/one-third ALS cut, and ACL/all ALS cut) were significantly larger than those under the ACL-intact conditions (ACL intact, one-third ALS cut, all ALS cut) (P < .01). However, no statistically significant differences were observed among the intact, one-third ALS–cut, and all ALS–cut conditions, within the ACL-intact or ACL-cut conditions. Conclusion: Intra-articular dissection of the ALS did not increase the ATT during the Lachman test or the APT and PTT during the pivot-shift test under the intact condition of the ITB, regardless of the integrity of the ACL. When the ITB is intact, the ALS does not have a significant role in either anterior or dynamic rotatory knee stability, while the ACL does. Clinical Relevance: Recent growing interest about ALL reconstruction or ALS augmentation may not have a large role in controlling either anterior or dynamic rotatory knee instability in isolated ACL-deficient knees.

Increased knee laxity with hamstring tendon autograft compared to patellar tendon autograft: a cohort study of 5462 patients with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PurposeTo compare anterior knee laxity and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed with bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts and, moreover, to study any correlation between postoperative anterior knee laxity and PROMs.MethodsPatients who underwent primary ACLR at Capio Artro Clinic, Stockholm, Sweden, from January 2000 to October 2015, were identified in our local database. Instrumented laxity measurements and PROMs were reviewed. The KT-1000 arthrometer, with an anterior tibial load of 134-N, was used to evaluate knee laxity preoperatively and at the 6-month follow-up. The Lysholm score was collected preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was collected preoperatively and at the 1-year follow-up.ResultsA total of 5462 primary ACLRs, 692 BPTBs and 4770 HT autografts were included in the study. All the patients showed a significant reduction in knee laxity from preoperatively to postoperatively (BPTB group: from 3.8 ± 2.6 to 1.2 ± 2.1 mm; HT group: from 3.6 ± 3.1 to 1.8 ± 2.2 mm; P < 0.001 for both). The HT group showed a significantly increased postoperative knee laxity compared with the BPTB group (1.8 ± 2.2 vs 1.2 ± 2.1 mm; P < 0.001). The mean anterior tibial translation (ATT) reduction from preoperative to postoperative was significantly larger for the BPTB graft compared with the HT graft (2.7 ± 2.2 vs 1.7 ± 2.6 mm; P < 0.001). A significantly higher rate of “surgical failures”, defined as a postoperative side-to-side (STS) difference > 5 mm, was found in the HT group compared with the BPTB group at follow-up (4.3 vs 2.4%; P < 0.001). A significantly larger improvement was found in the HT group compared with the BPTB group for the KOOS Pain (9.5 vs 8.0; P = 0.02), Activities of Daily Living (7.2 vs 5.7; P = 0.006), Sports (24.2 vs 15.3; P < 0.001) and Quality of Life (25.8 vs 22.1; P = 0.001) subscales. No significant difference regarding the mean improvement in the Lysholm knee score was found between the two grafts (BPTB group: 14.5, HT group: 14.0; n.s.). No correlation between postoperative anterior knee laxity and PROMs was found in either graft group.ConclusionPrimary ACLR performed with HT autograft resulted in greater postoperative anterior knee laxity and significantly more surgical failures (STS > 5 mm) compared with BPTB autograft. The BPTB autograft showed a larger anterior knee laxity reduction (ATT reduction) in conjunction with primary ACLR. The HT autograft led to a significantly larger improvement in four of five KOOS subscales from preoperatively to the 1-year follow-up, compared with BPTB autograft. There was no association between postoperative anterior knee laxity and PROMs for either graft. The findings of the present study provide clinicians with valuable information regarding differences in knee laxity and subjective knee function between BPTB and HT autograft after primary ACLR. The use of BPTB autograft should be considered for patients with high knee stability demands.Level of evidenceRetrospective cohort study, Level III.

The Effect of Sequential Tearing of the Anterior Cruciate and Anterolateral Ligament on Anterior Translation and the Pivot-Shift Phenomenon: A Cadaveric Study Using Navigation

To evaluate the effect of progressive lesions of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) on anterior tibial translation (ATT) as evaluated through the Lachman test and internal tibial rotation (ITR) during a dynamic pivot-shift test in a cadaveric model. A total of 7 specimens were tested using a navigation system (2.2 OrthoPilot ACL navigation system). The anterior stability of the knee was measured through the Lachman test and dynamic rotational stability was measured through the pivot-shift test in 3 different conditions: intact knee; ACL-deficient knee; and finally, ACL- and ALL-deficient knee. The resulting measurements from the navigation system recorded the real-time changes in both translation and internal rotation during the Lachman and pivot-shift maneuvers. Mean ATT was 7.57±0.53mm in the intact knee, 14 ± 2.44mm in the ACL-deficient knee, and 14 ± 2.44mm in the ACL- and ALL-deficient knee. Mean ITR during the pivot-shift test was 10.14° ± 2.26° in the intact knee, 12.14° ± 2.19° in the ACL-deficient knee, and 18.86° ± 2.73° in the ACL- and ALL-deficient knee. There was a statistically significant difference in static ATT between the intact and ACL-deficient knees (P= .039) but no difference through the addition of an ALL lesion (P= .068). For dynamic rotational control testing, there was no significant difference in ATT between groups but a significant difference in ITR was found (F= 25.17, P= .00034). During the pivot-shift test, a combined lesion of the ACL and ALL has a significant effect on ITR whereas an isolated lesion of the ACL has no effect on either ATT or ITR. During the Lachman test, an isolated lesion of the ACL has a significant effect on ATT but an additional lesion of the ALL does not affect ATT. Dynamic rotational control as tested by the pivot-shift test is greatly influenced by a combined lesion of the ACL and ALL. In clinical cases of a pivot shift, addressing the anterolateral structures may be considered.

Segond\u2019s fracture: a biomechanical cadaveric study using navigation

BackgroundSegond’s fracture is a well-recognised radiological sign of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear. While previous studies evaluated the role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) and complex injuries on rotational stability of the knee, there are no studies on the biomechanical effect of Segond’s fracture in an ACL deficient knee. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a Segond’s fracture on knee rotation stability as evaluated by a navigation system in an ACL deficient knee.Materials and methodsThree different conditions were tested on seven knee specimens: intact knee, ACL deficient knee and ACL deficient knee with Segond’s fracture. Static and dynamic measurements of anterior tibial translation (ATT) and axial tibial rotation (ATR) were recorded by the navigation system (2.2 OrthoPilot ACL navigation system B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany).ResultsStatic measurements at 30° showed that the mean ATT at 30° of knee flexion was 5.1 ± 2.7 mm in the ACL intact condition, 14.3 ± 3.1 mm after ACL cut (P = 0.005), and 15.2 ± 3.6 mm after Segond’s fracture (P = 0.08). The mean ATR at 30° of knee flexion was 20.7° ± 4.8° in the ACL intact condition, 26.9° ± 4.1° in the ACL deficient knee (P > 0.05) and 30.9° ± 3.8° after Segond’s fracture (P = 0.005). Dynamic measurements during the pivot-shift showed that the mean ATT was 7.2 ± 2.7 mm in the intact knee, 9.1 ± 3.3 mm in the ACL deficient knee(P = 0.04) and 9.7 ± 4.3 mm in the ACL deficient knee with Segond’s fracture (P = 0.07). The mean ATR was 9.6° ± 1.8° in the intact knee, 12.3° ± 2.3° in the ACL deficient knee (P > 0.05) and 19.1° ± 3.1° in the ACL deficient knee with Segond’s lesion (P = 0.016).ConclusionAn isolated lesion of the ACL only affects ATT during static and dynamic measurements, while the addition of Segond’s fracture has a significant effect on ATR in both static and dynamic execution of the pivot-shift test, as evaluated with the aid of navigation.

Extra-articular ACL Reconstruction and Pivot Shift

Background: The pivot-shift test is considered a reliable examination to evaluate the results of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, as it strongly correlates with patient satisfaction, giving-way episodes, and activity level. The addition of lateral tenodesis (LT) to current techniques of intra-articular reconstruction with a hamstring graft could potentially improve knee laxity in cases of severe rotational instability. Purpose: To biomechanically investigate the effect of intra- and extra-articular ACL reconstructions on knee laxity and the pivot-shift phenomenon. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty patients underwent anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction with doubled semitendinosus and gracilis tendons with the addition of extra-articular reconstruction. In patients in group A, intra-articular reconstruction was performed first and LT thereafter; in patients in group B, LT was performed first and intra-articular reconstruction thereafter. A navigator equipped with software designed for both static and dynamic evaluations was used to measure maximum anterior tibial translation (ATT) and axial tibial rotation (ATR) at 30° of flexion (static evaluation) and during the pivot-shift test (dynamic evaluation). Measurements were performed before reconstruction, after the first procedure, and after the second procedure. Results: For the static evaluation, in group A, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 14.1 ± 3.7 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 6.0 ± 1.9 mm after ACL reconstruction and to 5.3 ± 1.6 mm after LT. The mean ATR at 30° of knee flexion significantly decreased from 35.7° ± 4.8° to 28.9° ± 4.1° and to 20.9° ± 4.8°, respectively. In group B, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 13.5 ± 6.5 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 10.2 ± 3.2 mm after LT and to 4.0 ± 1.6 mm after ACL reconstruction. The mean ATR at 30° of knee flexion significantly decreased from 36.7° ± 4.8° to 26.2° ± 6.2° and to 23.5° ± 4.9°, respectively. For the dynamic evaluation (pivot-shift test), in group A, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 15.0 ± 6.8 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 9.4 ± 6.4 mm after ACL reconstruction and to 8.5 ± 5.4 mm after LT. The mean ATR significantly decreased from 16.9° ± 4.7° to 11.6° ± 4.1° and to 6.1° ± 2.2°, respectively. In group B, the mean ATT significantly decreased from 12.5 ± 3.3 mm in the preoperative (ACL-deficient) condition to 9.1 ± 5.9 mm after LT and to 8.1 ± 5.4 mm after ACL reconstruction. The mean ATR significantly decreased from 16.0° ± 4.5° to 9.2° ± 4.3° and to 7.5° ± 4.0°, respectively. Conclusion/Clinical Relevance: Extra-articular reconstruction had little effect in reducing the anterior displacement of the tibia at 30° of flexion, but it was more effective than intra-articular reconstruction in reducing ATR. Anatomic ACL reconstruction and LT were synergic in controlling the pivot-shift phenomenon.

Intraoperative Navigation Evaluation of Tibial Translation After Resection of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Remnants

This study aimed to assess knee laxity before and after resection of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) remnants, using a computer navigation system. This prospective study included 83 knees undergoing primary navigated ACL reconstruction. ACL remnants were classified into 4 morphologic types based on the arthroscopic findings: type 1, bridging between the posterior cruciate ligament and tibia; type 2, bridging between the roof of the intercondylar notch and tibia; type 3, bridging between the lateral wall of the intercondylar notch and tibia; and type 4, no substantial ACL remnants. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and range of internal-external rotation of tibia (total rotation) at 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, and 90° of knee flexion were measured before and after resection of the ACL remnants by use of the additional functions of the navigation system. The different morphologic types of the ACL remnants were as follows: type 1, 12 knees; type 2, 16 knees; type 3, 51 knees; and type 4, 4 knees. There were no significant differences in the mean ATT before and after resection at any knee flexion angle in type 1, 2, or 4 knees. In type 3 knees the mean ATT at 15° of knee flexion before resection significantly increased after resection. There were no significant differences in the mean total rotation before and after resection at any knee flexion angle for each type. After resection of the ACL remnants, 12 knees (14.5%) in the type 3 showed an increased ATT by 3 mm or more. This study suggests that the ACL remnant does not play a major role in stabilization of the knee. Although type 3 ACL remnants significantly decreased anterior knee laxity in the knee extension position, the knee stability provided by the ACL remnants was not adequate. Level II, prognostic study.

Quantitative evaluation of anterior tibial translation during isokinetic motion in knees with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either patellar or hamstring tendon grafts

We studied 79 patients with unilateral injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). The patients were randomly allocated to reconstruction with autologous patellar bone-tendon-bone (BTB) grafts (49 knees) or hamstring tendon (ST) grafts (30 knees). We measured anterior tibial translation (ATT) during isokinetic concentric contraction exercise 18-20 months after surgery using a computerized electrogoniometer. In both groups the highest ATT during exercise was observed at a knee flexion of about 20 degrees and was 13.5+/-3.0 mm in the BTB group and 13.9+/-3.4 mm in the ST group. There was no difference in the ATT between the reconstructed and healthy knees. For a range of knee flexion between 30 and 50 degrees the ATT in the ST group was significantly higher on the reconstructed side than on the healthy side. In the BTB group, the mean ATT in the reconstructed group was similar to that on the healthy side at a knee flexion angle between 0 and 90 degrees .

Characteristics of anterior tibial translation with active and isokinetic knee extension exercise before and after ACL reconstruction

The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of anterior tibial translation (ATT) in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient or -reconstructed knees with active and isokinetic knee extension exercise. Forty-nine patients with unilateral isolated ACL-deficient knees were enrolled. Follow-up examinations were carried out at a mean of 24 months postoperatively. An electrogoniometer system was applied to compare the amount of ATT in ACL-deficient and -reconstructed knees. For both active and isokinetic knee extension, the mean ATT of ACLdeficient knees was considerably greater than that for the normal side, within a range of flexion 0°–70° and 0°–60°, respectively. In contrast, no mean ATT differences were seen during both active and isokinetic exercise from 90° to 0° at follow-up. Within a range of flexion between 50° and 70°, the side-to-side difference in ATT with active knee extension was significantly greater than that with isokinetic extension in ACL-reconstructed knees. These results suggest that the amount of ATT is significantly improved with both active and isokinetic exercise, postoperatively. However, postoperative ATT with isokinetic extension is smaller than that with active knee extension from 50° to 70°.

THE EFFECT OF FUNCTIONAL BRACE WEAR AND HAMSTRING CONTRACTION ON THE ACL DEFICIENT KNEE 219

Relatively low to moderate anterior loads can cause a large amount of anterior tibial translation in ACL deficient patients leading to subluxations and further joint damage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of a functional knee brace and hamstring contraction on the laxity/stiffness profile of the knee joint in ACL deficient subjects. Nine ACL deficient subjects underwent static and dynamic laxity testing of the knee joint with and without a functional brace (CTi Edge, Innovation Sports). Three trials of an instrumented Lachman (OSI CA-4000) exam were performed on the ACL deficient and non-injured knees with and without the brace using 45, 90, 135, and 180N of force. The subjects were also tested with the same protocol while contracting their hamstrings at 50% of maximum. Mean anterior tibial translation (ATT) without the brace was 12.4mm at 90N and 17.3mm at 180N. Translation decreased to 7mm and 12.8mm with the brace (p<0.05). Contraction of the hamstrings decreased ATT to 1.6mm at 90N and 3.3mm at 180N, an improvement of 89% (p<0.05) versus the no brace condition. The combination of hamstring contraction with bracing resulted in mean ATT of 2.0mm at 90N and 3.4mm at 180N and were not significant when compared to bracing alone. Dynamic testing produced no significant differences between brace conditions. At 45N, stiffness increased by 51% (6.8N/mm to 13.9N/mm) during brace wear (p<0.05). Larger anterior forces were required to produce an equivalent amount of translation in a braced, ACL deficient knee when compared to an unbraced ACL deficient knee. These results suggest that bracing may help prevent further damage to an ACL deficient knee by restricting excessive movement.

Effect of torso position on arthrometric assessment of anterior knee laxity

The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of changes in torso position on arthrometric assessment of knee laxity. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) of 12 control and 12 ACL deficient subjects was assessed using a Dynamic Cruciate Tester during five maximal isometric knee extensions and five passive tests (240 N load) on the right and left knee in each of three torso positions: vertical, reclined, and supine. Electromyographic activity of rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, and semimembranosus were sampled during arthrometric assessment. Results indicated there was no significant difference in mean ATT as a function of torso position. However, subjects demonstrated significantly greater hamstring activity when seated vertically compared to reclined or supine and significantly greater hamstring activity when reclined compared to supine.