Mean American Shoulder And Elbow Surgeons Score Research Articles

Minimum four-year clinical outcomes after on-table reconstruction technique for Dubberley type III in coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea: a report of 10 patients

PurposeComminuted coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus represent rare injuries and are difficult to treat, especially comminuted capitellum and trochlear fractures (Dubberley Type III). The on-table reconstruction technique of comminuted articular fractures may be an option, although it has not been reported in the coronal shear fracture of the distal humerus. The aim of the present case series is to determine the functional and radiological outcomes of on-table reconstructed Dubberley III fractures.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of 10 patients with Dubberley type III fractures in coronal shear fractures of the capitellum and trochlea who underwent an ‘on-table’ reconstruction technique between January 2009 and October 2019. All patients were evaluated using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons(ASES) score, Mayo Elbow Score Performance Index (MEPI) score and at least 4 years later.ResultsAll cases achieved union. At the final follow-up, the mean range of elbow motion was 11.5°of flexion contracture and 131.9° of further flexion. The mean DASH score was 21.2 (5.7) points (range 13.3–32.5). The mean ASES score was 88.6 ± 7.4 (range, 77 to 100). The mean MEPI score was 87 (10) points (range 70–100). In complication, partial osteonecrosis of capitellum is developed in one patient. One patient had heterotopic ossification without functional impairment.ConclusionThe on-table reconstruction technique can be a reliable option in the surgical treatment of complex distal humerus fractures. This technique allows anatomical reduction of comminuted capitellum and trochlea, with a low risk of avascular necrosis over 4 years of follow-up.Level of evidenceLevel IV, retrospective case series.

Outcomes following fixation of distal clavicle fractures utilizing arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular ligament stabilization with a suspensory endobutton and cerclage tape

BackgroundDistal one-third clavicle fractures are frequently unstable and often require surgical fixation due to high rates of nonunion. Many common methods of fixation have high rates of union but are associated with hardware discomfort and need for secondary surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of a fixation technique involving arthroscopically assisted open reduction internal fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures via a coracoclavicular suspensory endobutton and cerclage tape. MethodsThis was a retrospective case series evaluating patients who underwent fixation of unstable distal clavicle fractures via arthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular stabilization by a single fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeon between 2020 and 2022. Demographic and injury related data were collected via chart review. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were reviewed to evaluate for signs of radiographic union. Primary outcome measures included fracture union, complications, and need for additional procedures. Patients were also contacted via telephone to obtain American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores. ResultsSix patients were eligible for inclusion in this study with mean age of 52.8 +/- 14.0 and mean follow-up of 2.0 years (range 1.6 – 2.7 years). Mean ASES scores were 86.2 +/- 21.8 (range 52 – 100). There were no postoperative complications, signs of symptomatic hardware, or need for secondary surgery at final follow-up among this cohort of patients. All patients had achieved and maintained full radiographic union at mean radiographic follow-up of 5.5 months (range 2.0 – 12.9 months). ConclusionsArthroscopically assisted coracoclavicular stabilization of distal clavicle fractures demonstrated high union rates while limiting complications or need for secondary hardware removal. Further analysis on a larger scale is recommended to determine long-term outcomes and direct comparison to other surgical techniques.

Cemented vs. press-fit humeral stems: a matched cohort analysis at a mean follow-up of 10 years

IntroductionWhile cementation of humeral stems has long been considered the gold standard for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), cementless, or press-fit, fixation offers a relatively cheaper and less demanding alternative, particularly in the setting of a revision procedure. However, this approach has been accompanied by concerns of implant loosening and high rates of radiolucency. In the present study we performed a propensity matched comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes between cemented and cementless fixation techniques for aTSA. MethodsThis study was a retrospective comparison of 50 shoulders undergoing aTSA: 25 using cemented humeral fixation versus 25 using press-fit humeral fixation. Patients in the two groups were propensity matched according to age, sex, and preoperative ASES score. Primary outcome measures included range of motion (ROM) (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation), patient reported outcomes (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Visual Analog Scores (VAS)), and implant survival. ResultsAt baseline, the two fixation groups were similar in regard to age, sex, BMI, preoperative ASES score, and surgical indication. Mean follow-up was 11.7 ± 4.95 years in the cemented cohort and 9.13 ± 3.77 years in the press-fit cohort (p=0.045). Both groups demonstrated significant improvements postoperatively in all included ROM and patient-reported outcomes. However, press-fit patients reported significantly better VAS, ASES, and SST scores. Mean VAS pain score was 1.1 ± 1.8 in press-fit patients and 3.2 ± 3.0 in cemented patients (p=0.005). The mean ASES score was 87.7 ± 12.4 in press-fit patients and 69.5 ± 22.7 in cemented patients (p=0.002). Lastly, the mean SST score was 9.8 ± 3.1 in press-fit patients and 7.7 ± 3.7 in cemented patients (p=0.040). Both fixation techniques provided lasting implant survivorship with only a single revision operation in each of the cohorts. ConclusionHerein, we provide a propensity matched, long-term comparison of patients receiving anatomic shoulder arthroplasty stratified according to humeral stem fixation technique. The results of this analysis illustrate that both types of humeral fixation techniques yield durable and significant improvements in shoulder function with similar rates of survival at 10 years of follow-up.

Paper 10: Return-to-Play Following Latarjet Procedure in Young Contact Athletes

Objectives: Young athletes that play a contact sport are susceptible to anterior glenohumeral instability due to high-velocity impacts and repetitive dislocations. Few studies have examined return-to play and patient outcomes following Latarjet procedure in this patient population. The objective of this study was to investigate postoperative return to contact sports in athletes undergoing the Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability. Methods: 67 consecutive contact athletes (71 shoulders), age ≤35, that underwent Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder instability between 1/1/2018 and 3/31/2021 were retrospectively identified. Demographic information, medical history, surgical history, number of dislocations prior to surgery, and post-operative complications up to 6 months after surgery were reviewed. 42 patients were interviewed with minimum follow-up of 12 months. Outcomes evaluated include return to play, competition level, patient satisfaction, and patient-reported outcomes including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) Score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: Mean age at time of surgery for the total cohort was 19.7 years. 19/67 (28.3%) of patients had prior shoulder surgery, most commonly arthroscopic stabilization. On average, patients had 24.2 frank dislocations (SD 39.1) prior to undergoing Latarjet procedure. 8/67 (11.9%) of patients experienced unresolved pain or stiffness six months after surgery and 2/67 (2.9%) required re-operation after Latarjet. Only one patient experienced hardware failure. 42 patients (63%) were interviewed with mean follow-up of 26.7 months, of which 20 played football. 14/42 (33%) athletes competed at the collegiate level, and 23/42 (55%) at the high school level at the time of surgery. 33/42 patients (78.6%) returned to sport, of which 29/33 (88%) returned to playing at the same competition level; 12/20 (60%) of football players returned to sport. 3/42 (7%) reported recurrent dislocation. Mean ASES score was 91.7, DASH score 6.1, and visual analog scale 4. 38/42 (90%) patients reported improvement in quality of life after undergoing Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability. Conclusions: The Latarjet procedure allows young contact athletes with shoulder instability to return to competitive play at strong rates. Although there is high patient satisfaction with the Latarjet procedure, recurrent instability and unresolved pain and stiffness are significant post-operative complications.

Does the presence of arthroscopically detected stage 1-2 glenohumeral osteoarthritis have any clinical impact on the outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs?

: Rotator cuff rupture (RCR) and glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHO) are two common disorders of the shoulder joint. However, there are very few reports that examine the relationship between them. This study aimed to present at least two years' clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair of full-thickness and massive tears accompanied by arthroscopically detected early-stage osteoarthritis. From August 2016 to December 2017, three hundred and twenty patients with total or massive rotator cuff tears were evaluated retrospectively. Thirty-five patients who were determined as stage 1 and 2 according to the Outerbridge scale for cartilage lesions were found appropriate for investigation. Patients were assessed using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, and a visual analog scale (VAS) score before surgery and at the final follow-up. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score was used to evaluate the final outcomes and compare the UCLA shoulder scores. The UCLA scores increased from the preoperative value of 19.1 ± 3.2 to 29.8 ± 4.8 at the last follow-up and increased by an average of 10.7 ± 6.0 (p < 0.001). The median VAS score decreased from the preoperative value of 3.0 to 1.0 (p < 0.001). Besides, the mean ASES score was found as 80.2 ± 10.6. An excellent positive correlation was found between postoperative UCLA scores and ASES scores (r = 0.887; p < 0.001). To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first arthroscopic comparative studies about the effect of early glenohumeral osteoarthritis on clinical outcomes after rotator cuff tear treatment. Finding good and excellent results up to 71% after RCR repair in patients with early-stage osteoarthritis was an indication that arthroscopic repair could be planned as the first-line treatment option for RCR pathologies in patients with early-stage degenerative arthritis without considering the rerupture rate.

Does Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty improve Emotional Status and Quality of Life in Patients with Rotator Cuff Insufficiency? Prospective Sequential Follow-up Study.

The purpose of this study was to investigate sequential changes of emotional status and quality of life after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for rotator cuff insufficiency and to determine the predictors that can affect postoperative clinical outcomes. This study was conducted to prove the hypothesis that RSA would improve emotional status and quality of life. Fifty patients undergoing RSA for rotator cuff insufficiency were prospectively included. Evaluation using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and Abbreviated scale of World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) was performed before surgery and at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Mean VAS pain score, HADS-depression, and HADS-anxiety scores showed a significant decrease from 6.6, 13.3 and 13.9 before surgery, to 1.5, 3.9 and 3.7 after 12 months after surgery (all P < .001). Mean ASES score, WHOQOL-BREF score, and SSV showed significant improvement from 28.5, 32.3, and 23.6% to 81.3, 79.1, and 78.4% (all P < .001). All outcome measurements showed significant improvement from 6 weeks after RSA. In multivariate analysis, age was an independent predictor of final ASES score and WHOQOL-BREF score (P = .037 and .004). This study showed sequential improvement of emotional status and quality of life as well as functional recovery with pain relief from 6 weeks after RSA in patients with rotator cuff insufficiency. Especially, younger patients had better postoperative functional ability and quality of life. These findings suggest that RSA for rotator cuff insufficiency provides rapid improvement of emotional status and quality of life.

Short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes in patients treated with a modern intramedullary nailing system for 2-part proximal humerus fractures

ObjectivesThe optimal surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) remains controversial. There are advocates for both open reduction and internal fixation with plate and screws (ORIF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN). The purpose this study was to evaluate the early-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of IMN for isolated, displaced 2-part surgical neck PHFs using a modern, straight nail system and to determine the effect of preoperative patient and fracture characteristics on outcome. MethodsThis was a case series of 23 patients with displaced 2-part surgical neck PHFs who were treated with ORIF using a straight IMN with minimum follow-up of 1 year (mean 2.5 years [range, 1.1–4.6]). Patients were identified retrospectively and contacted for measurement of active range of motion (AROM) and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and Visual Analog Scale Pain score (VAS Pain). Plain radiographs were evaluated to assess the quality of the reduction and failure of fixation. Complications and reoperations were identified. ResultsReduction was anatomic in 12 (52%) patients, acceptable in 9 (39%), and 2 (9%) were malreduced. There were no differences in reduction quality based on sex (p = 0.37), age at surgery (p = 0.68), calcar comminution (p = 0.68), number of screws in the head (p = 0.99), or medial hinge disruption (p = 0.06). At final follow-up, the mean ASES score was 92 ± 10, OSS was 45 ± 4, SANE was 93 ± 7, EQ-5D of 0.85 ± 0.17, and VAS Pain was 0 ± 1. The mean active forward flexion was 143° ± 16°, active external rotation was 68° ± 20°, and internal rotation was T11 ± 4 vertebrae. Two (9%) patients underwent reoperation and 2 (9%) patients experienced clinical failure not requiring reoperation. ConclusionsStraight IMN is a reliable treatment for displaced 2–part surgical neck PHFs with excellent radiographic and clinical outcomes in early follow-up. The implant facilitated anatomic or acceptable alignment of the fracture in the vast majority of patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Surgery in Nonthrowing Athletes

Background: Ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) surgery continues to demonstrate excellent clinical outcomes and a high return-to-play (RTP) rate with a low complication rate. Recent studies have demonstrated similar clinical outcomes for baseball players who have undergone either UCL reconstruction or UCL repair. In comparison, few studies have assessed the clinical outcomes of UCL surgery for nonthrowing athletes. Purpose/Hypothesis: The primary objective of this study is to provide clinical outcomes of UCL surgery performed in nonthrowing athletes at a single institution with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Our hypothesis was that these patients would have similar clinical outcomes, complication rates, and RTP rates when compared with throwing athletes. Level of Evidence: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: From our longitudinal elbow registry, 40 nonthrowing athletes were identified who underwent UCL surgery (repair or reconstruction) between 2011 and 2019. Participant characteristics were recorded: age, sex, laterality, arm dominance, sport, level of competition, and type of surgery (UCL repair or reconstruction). Outcomes included RTP rate and average time, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and complications. Results: From the 40 patients eligible for inclusion in this study with a minimum 2-year follow-up, 37 (93%) were successfully contacted: 16 male (43%) and 21 female (57%). Mean ± standard deviation age at the time of surgery was 18.0 ± 3.7 years. From the 37 technical procedures, 28 (76%) were UCL repairs and 9 (24%) were UCL reconstructions. For these patients, 15 (41%) had partial tears, 20 (54%) had complete tears, 1 (3%) had a medial epicondyle avulsion, and 1 (3%) had an unspecified pathology. Sports included football (n = 11), gymnastics (11), cheerleading (7), wrestling (4), volleyball (2), basketball (1), and acrobatics (1). Quarterbacks were excluded from the football patients, as quarterbacks are throwing athletes. Level of competition included high school (n = 26), college (8), professional (2), and youth sports (1). The RTP rate was 93% (26/28) at a mean 7.4 months for UCL repair and 100% (9/9) at a mean 10.0 months for UCL reconstruction. Mean ASES scores were 94.4 and 98.7 for UCL repair and reconstruction, respectively. Complications were low, with 2 patients in the UCL repair group requiring ulnar nerve transposition for ulnar nerve paresthesia. Conclusion: In nonthrowing athletes, patients undergoing UCL repair and UCL reconstruction show favorable outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. RTP and clinical outcomes are consistent with previous studies in baseball players as well as a parallel ongoing study conducted on non–baseball throwing athletes.

Correlation of patient-reported outcome measurement information system-upper extremity with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores in shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundMultiple outcome measure surveys are available to assess preoperative and postoperative outcomes for a variety of orthopedic procedures such as shoulder arthroplasty. Although legacy instruments such as American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) remain popular, there remains no singular gold standard survey instrument for shoulder arthroplasty patients, and alternative instruments have been developed to better capture clinical outcomes. The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE) using computer adaptive technology with ASES scores both preoperatively and postoperatively in shoulder arthroplasty patients. Our hypothesis is that there would be a strong correlation between PROMIS-UE and ASES scores both preoperatively and postoperatively in total shoulder arthroplasty patients. MethodsPatients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty and agreed to complete baseline and 1-year follow-up of ASES and PROMIS-UE scores were included. Patients also completed PROMIS-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) as a third point comparison. Responses to these instruments were statistically analyzed and compared using Pearson correlation coefficients. Floor and ceiling effects were then calculated. ResultsNinety patients were included in this study, all of whom completed the PROMIS-UE, PROMIS-PF, and ASES surveys both preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. The mean age in this cohort was 68.9 years (standard deviation [SD] 8.4 years, range 39-89). The mean preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-UE scores were 26.6 (SD 6.7, range 14.7-44.6) and 41.8 (SD 10.3, range 20.2-56.4) respectively. Mean preoperative and postoperative PROMIS-PF computer adaptive technology scores were 35.7 (SD 9.54, range 34.2-64) and 44.3 (SD 9.22, range 23.5-73.3) respectively. The mean ASES score was 37.5 preoperatively (SD 18.0, range 5-99.5) and 77.5 postoperatively (SD 20.5, range 25.0-100.0). PROMIS-UE demonstrated a moderate correlation with ASES preoperatively and a strong correlation postoperatively (r = 0.52, confidence interval 0.27-0.60; r = 0.70, confidence interval 0.55-0.78, respectively). PROMIS-UE demonstrated a minor floor effect preoperatively (7.8%) but significant ceiling effect postoperatively (24.4%) and ASES demonstrated a mild ceiling effect at final follow-up (8.9%). There were otherwise no other floor or ceiling effects at all other time points across each survey. ConclusionPROMIS-UE correlates well with ASES at both baseline and 1-year postoperation for patients undergoing total shoulder replacement. In addition, the change seen between both baseline and 1 year outcome scores for both scoring systems also correlates strongly, suggesting that PROMIS-UE may be a suitable alternative to ASES for this patient population.

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration: Case Series.

Objective Shoulder pain is a common presentation in the primary care setting, and shoulder pain after vaccination has a growing body of literature. The present study sought to understand how a standardized treatment protocol would aid patients experiencing shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA). Methods Patients experiencing SIRVA were retrospectively recruited between February 2017 and February 2021. All patients were treated with physical therapy and offered a cortisone injection. Post-treatment range of motion (i.e., forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation) and patients' reported outcomes were collected with the visual analogue scale (VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), simple shoulder test (SST), and single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) scores. Results A total of 9 patients were retrospectively examined. Among them, 6 patients presented within one month of a recent vaccination event, while 3 patients presented 67, 87, and 120 days after vaccination. Furthermore, 8 of the patients completed physical therapy, and 6 of them underwent a cortisone injection. The follow-up time averaged 8 months. At final follow-up, the mean external rotation was 61° (standard deviation, SD ± 3°) and the mean forward elevation was 179° (SD ± 45°). Internal rotation ranged between L3 and T10. The VAS pain scores were 3.5/10.0 (SD ± 2.4), the mean ASES score was 63.5/100.0 (SD ± 26.3), and the SST scores were 8.5/12.0 (SD ± 3.9). Finally, the SANE scores were 75.7/100.0 (SD ± 24.7) and 95.7/100.0 (SD ± 6.1) in the injured and contralateral shoulders respectively. Conclusion Shoulder pain after a vaccination treated with physical therapy and cortisone injection ultimately resulted in favorable shoulder range of motion and functional score outcomes. Level of Evidence IV.

Is coracoclavicular ossification a complication or a good prognostic factor after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injury?

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether heterotopic ossification (HO) in the coracoclavicular (CC) space after surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a complication or a sign of good prognosis.MethodsFifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent CC reconstruction with or without augmentation of the ACJ for acute ACJ injuries were analyzed. Postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score (CS), subjective shoulder value (SSV), and visual analog scale (VAS) results were evaluated. For radiological evaluation, HO was evaluated, and CC distances were measured.ResultsFifty-one patients (11 women and 40 men; mean age, 36 years [range, 17-68 years]) were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 3 years (range, 2-8 years). The mean ASES score at the follow-up was 82.73 (range, 51.6-100), mean CS was 85 (range, 50-100), mean SSV was 80 (range, 40-100), and mean VAS was 1.9 (range, 0-5). It was observed that the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) of patients who developed ossification in the CC space were better than those who did not although it was not statistically significant. No statistically significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes (ASES, CS, SSV, VAS) between patients who underwent CC reconstruction without augmentation of the ACJ and those who were combined (P > .05).ConclusionHO in the CC space is a common finding following AC joint fixation injury. We suggest that HO is not a complication and might possibly have positive effects on clinical outcomes.

Paper 16: Clinical Outcomes and Return to Play in Softball Players Following Biceps Tenodesis or SLAP Repair

Objectives:Shoulder pain due to labral tears and biceps tendon pathology is commonly found in competitive softball players. Surgical options for treatment of these sources of shoulder pain include labral repair and biceps tenodesis. While past studies comparing these two modalities are limited by mostly heterogeneous study groups from multiple sports, this is the first study to our knowledge that assesses clinical outcomes and return to play rates specifically for softball players. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes and return to play for softball players treated for a SLAP tear and recalcitrant biceps tendonitis with a biceps tenodesis compared with a traditional SLAP repair. We hypothesized that performing a biceps tenodesis in softball players that have recalcitrant biceps tendonitis or a SLAP tear would have comparable outcomes with a faster return to play compared to SLAP repair.Methods:We performed a retrospective analysis on all patients who were active softball players at the time of injury treated surgically for either a SLAP tear, recalcitrant biceps tendonitis or a combination of both between 2001 and 2019. Inclusion criteria for this study included softball players who underwent biceps tenodesis or a SLAP repair at our institution with greater than 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria involved patients with less than 2-year follow-up and patients who had undergone concomitant procedures on the ipsilateral shoulder at the time of SLAP repair or biceps tenodesis. Follow-up was either self-reported through OBERD, a PRO-managing software, or achieved over the phone by three authors using four questionnaires: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES-S), Andrews/Carson KJOC, and our institution-specific VAS visual pain indication and return-to-play questionnaires.Results:After applying the proper inclusion and exclusion criteria, we identified 76 patients who were eligible for this study. From this group of 76 patients, 63 were successfully contacted over the phone or had self-reported outcome scores pulled from our PRO-managing software for a follow-up rate of 83%. The average age for our study group at the time of surgery was 20.6 years and the average post-operative follow-up time was 6.0 years.Of the 76 patients in our study, 34 underwent a biceps tenodesis procedure (45%), 21 underwent a SLAP repair procedure (28%), 6 underwent a combination of both procedures (8%), and 2 underwent a biceps tenotomy (3%).For the 34 patients in our study who underwent biceps tenodesis, the average age at the time of surgery was 20.0 years with a mean follow-up time of 3.7 years. The mean Andrews-Carson score was 82.2 and KJOC score was 73.7 in this group. The mean ASES-S score was 92.0 for the affected shoulder and 97.8 for the unaffected shoulder. The VAS pain indicator score for this group was 1.4 out of 10.The 21 patients in the study who underwent SLAP repair had an average age of 20.9 years at the time of surgery. The average age follow-up time was 8.18 years. This group demonstrated a mean Andrews-Carson score of 86.7 and a KJOC score of 80.7. The mean ASES-S score was 93.3 for the affected shoulder and 96.4 for the unaffected shoulder. The VAS pain indicator score for this group was 1.2 out of 10. Of the 21 SLAP repair patients, 20 (95%) returned to full competition at an average of 7.5 months. Of the 34 patients who underwent biceps tenodesis, 31 (91%) returned to full competition at an average of 7.1 months.Conclusions:In conclusion, this study demonstrated comparable outcomes between SLAP repairs and biceps tenodesis procedures among our study group. Statistical analysis of PRO scores for each group found no significant differences between any of the measures used to evaluate patient outcome post-operatively. There was no significant difference between RTP times between the two groups. Further analysis is needed for additional comparisons, including level of play and position data.

Return to Play After Biceps Tenodesis for Isolated SLAP Tears in Overhead Athletes

Background: Performing open subpectoral biceps tenodesis in overhead athletes with a superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) tear may affect their ability to return to overhead sports. Purpose: To investigate clinical outcomes in overhead athletes undergoing biceps tenodesis for the treatment of symptomatic, isolated SLAP tears involving the biceps-labral complex. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review of overhead athletes who underwent biceps tenodesis for a SLAP tear was performed. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain, subjective shoulder value (SSV), patient satisfaction, willingness to undergo surgery again, revision procedures, and return to play were evaluated. Psychological readiness to return to sport was evaluated using the SLAP–Return to Sport after Injury (SLAP-RSI) score. A P value of <.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The current study included 44 overhead athletes. The mean age was 34.9 years (range, 16-46 years), 79.5% were male, and the mean follow-up was 49.0 months (range, 18-107 months). Overall, 81.8% of patients returned to play their overhead sport after biceps tenodesis, and 59.1% of patients returned to the same or higher level of play. It took patients, on average, 8.7 months to return to play after biceps tenodesis. The mean SLAP-RSI score was 69.4, and 70.5% of patients passed the SLAP-RSI threshold of 56. The mean ASES score, VAS score, SSV, and satisfaction were 92.0, 0.8, 80.6, and 87.9%, respectively. No patients in our cohort required revision surgery. Conclusion: This study found that athletes undergoing biceps tenodesis for the treatment of a symptomatic, isolated SLAP tear had a high rate of return to play, good functional outcomes, and a low rate of revision surgery.

The effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications after rotator cuff surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are frequently used for postoperative pain management. However, animal studies have demonstrated negative effects of NSAIDs on bone and tendon healing after commonly performed procedures such as rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of postoperative NSAID use on opioid use, pain control, and shoulder outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of postoperative NSAID use was performed in patients undergoing primary arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery at a single institution. Patients were randomized to receive ibuprofen or placebo for 2 weeks postoperatively, in addition to opioid medication. They were instructed to keep a daily pain diary for the first week after surgery, which was returned at their first postoperative visit for analysis. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, shoulder range of motion, and 12-item Short Form Survey, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were collected. Assessment of rotator cuff healing was performed using ultrasound at 1 year postoperatively. A total of 50 patients in the placebo group and 51 patients in the ibuprofen group were included for analysis. There were no differences in age, race, sex, history of preoperative NSAID or opioid use, or operative findings between groups. The amount of mean total morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) used in the first postoperative week was lower in the ibuprofen group than in the placebo group (168 MMEs vs. 211 MMEs, P = .04). Early VAS scores on postoperative days 3, 4, 5, and 6 were lower in the ibuprofen group, but there was no difference in mean VAS scores between groups by 6 weeks after surgery. At 6 months, mean forward flexion and the mean ASES score were higher in the ibuprofen group than in the placebo group: 162° vs. 153° (P = .03) and 86 vs. 78 (P = .02), respectively. There were no differences in shoulder motion or 12-item Short Form Survey, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand, or ASES scores at 1 year. At 1 year after surgery, 7 patients in the ibuprofen group had evidence of tendon retear diagnosed on ultrasound (5 partial and 2 full thickness) compared with 13 patients in the placebo group (5 partial and 8 full thickness), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = .20). Postoperative ibuprofen use reduces opioid requirements and decreases patient pain levels in the first week after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In addition, ibuprofen use after rotator cuff repair does not lead to an increased risk of tendon retear.

Outcomes After Arthroscopic Anterior Shoulder Stabilization in Professional Handball Players

Background:Although numerous studies have reported on the redislocation rate and functional results of arthroscopic treatment for anterior shoulder instability in athletes, they have not disclosed outcomes in the high-risk group of elite handball players.Purpose:To investigate the postoperative outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for anterior shoulder instability as well as the return-to-sport (RTS) rate in professional handball players.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Involved in this study were 44 competitive handball players (47 shoulders) who underwent arthroscopic anterior capsulolabral reconstruction between 2010 and 2018 and had a minimum follow-up of 24 months. After surgery, patients completed a questionnaire that collected Rowe and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores and RTS data, and we compared these results with their preoperative scores. We also compared results according to the following subgroups: true dislocations versus recurrent subluxations, younger (<20 years) versus older (≥20 years) age, male versus female sex, and shorter versus longer duration of instability. Statistical analysis included the paired-samples t test and nonparametric Fisher exact test.Results:The mean follow-up period was 52.2 ± 21.4 months. There were 4 shoulders (9%) with recurrent instability. There were significant preoperative to postoperative improvements in the mean Rowe score (from 45.2 to 91.8) and mean ASES score (from 70.6 to 95.7) (P < .001 for both). Overall, the RTS rate was 83%, and 64% (30/47 shoulders) were able to return to their preinjury level. The RTS rate was significantly lower in the younger players than in the older players (46% vs 86%, respectively; P = .005).Conclusion:The study results indicated that handball players with anterior shoulder instability can be treated using arthroscopic labral reconstruction successfully and 83% of the athletes were able to RTS activity. The handball players aged ≥20 years returned to their preinjury level of sport at a higher rate than did those aged <20 years.

Clinical effect of using MultiLoc® nails to treat four-part proximal humeral fractures.

ObjectiveThis study was performed to evaluate the clinical effect of MultiLoc® nails (DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, USA) on the treatment of four-part proximal humeral fractures (PHFs).MethodsFrom January 2014 to January 2018, 32 patients with four-part PHFs were treated with intramedullary MultiLoc® nails in our hospital. The operation time, bleeding volume, postoperative X-ray findings, and fracture healing status were recorded and analyzed. At the end of follow-up, the clinical outcome was evaluated based on the visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, Constant–Murley score (CMS), and occurrence of any complications.ResultsAmong all patients, the average operation time was 124.5 minutes (range, 91–152 minutes), the average amount of bleeding was 90 mL (range, 55–150 mL), and the fracture healing rate was 100%. At the end of follow-up, the mean VAS score was 1.6 ± 0.4, mean ASES score was 84.4 ± 6.3, and mean CMS was 70.3 ± 6.1; no serious complications had occurred; and the patients exhibited good recovery of shoulder function.ConclusionsMultiLoc nails® can be applied to the treatment of four-part PHFs. This surgical fixation method has no obvious complications and helps to restore shoulder function.

Acromioclavicular Joint Separation: Repair Through Suture Anchors for Coracoclavicular Ligament and Nonabsorbable Suture Fixation for Acromioclavicular Joint.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing coracoclavicular (CC) ligament repair by two suture anchors and acromioclavicular (AC) joint (ACJ) fixation using heavy nonabsorbable sutures for the treatment of types III–V ACJ injuries with a minimum of 1‐year follow‐up.MethodsThe clinical and radiographic outcomes of 36 consecutive patients (26 men and 10 women) who underwent anatomic reduction for acute ACJ dislocation using two suture anchors for CC ligament reconstruction and two strands of non‐absorbable stitches for ACJ fixation between December 2013 and December 2018 were reviewed. Two 3.5 mm suture anchors with double‐loaded sutures were separately inserted into the anterolateral and posteromedial portions of the coracoid process. The suture strands were passed through the hole created in the clavicle using 2.0 mm drill and tied over the clavicle. Additional ACJ augmentation using two strands of non‐absorbable heavy sutures was performed in all patients. At 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow‐up visit, the scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant–Murley score, and simple shoulder test (SST) questionnaires were used to provide a final evaluation of shoulder function. Comparison between baseline and treatment results was performed. Radiographic analysis included vertical displacement and horizontal shift.ResultsA total of 29 patients (20 men and nine women) were included in the study. A total of seven, six, and 16 patients had Rockwood type III, type IV, and type V ACJ dislocations, respectively. The mean patient age was 42.8 ± 13.5 years, with a mean follow‐up of 28 months (range, 12–56 months). At the 12‐month follow‐up, the mean ASES score was 92.1 ± 3.5, with a mean pain score of 0.5 ± 0.7 on the VAS and mean Constant–Murley score of 93.0 ± 2.4. The new number of positive answers on the SST was 11.5 ± 0.6. Compared with the baseline, the clinical results improved significantly (P < 0.05). No significant difference could be found between the 6‐ and 12‐month follow‐up evaluations (P > 0.05). Radiographs showed two partial loss of reduction, whereas no horizontal displacement was found in all patients. One patient developed a superficial wound infection 3 weeks postoperation. The wound healed after routine wound care. No neurovascular complications were recorded.ConclusionsCC ligament reconstruction using two suture anchors and ACJ augmentation using two strands of non‐absorbable heavy sutures on high‐grade AC dislocation is a reliable technique for restoring stability to the ACJ and can obtain good to excellent clinical results.

Outcomes and Complications After Primary Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Superior Labral Anterior-Posterior Tears or Biceps Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background:Biceps tenodesis is a surgical treatment for both superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears and long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) abnormalities. Biceps tenodesis can be performed either above or below the pectoralis major tendon with arthroscopic or open techniques.Purpose:To analyze the outcomes and complications comparing primary arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis for either SLAP tears or LHBT disorders.Study Design:Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:A search strategy based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Meta-Analyses) protocol was used to include 18 articles (471 patients) from a total of 974 articles identified. Overall exclusion criteria included the following: non–English language, non–full text, biceps tenodesis with concomitant rotator cuff repair, review articles, meta-analyses, and case reports. Data were extracted and analyzed according to procedure type and tenodesis location: arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis (295 patients) versus open subpectoral bicepts tenodesis (176 patients).Results:For arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis, the weighted mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score was 90.0 (97 patients) and the weighted mean Constant score was 88.7 (108 patients); for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis, the mean ASES score was 91.1 (199 patients) and mean Constant score was 84.7 (65 patients). Among the 176 patients who underwent arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, there was an overall complication rate of 9.1%. Among the 295 patients who underwent open biceps tenodesis, there was an overall complication rate of 13.5%. Both residual pain (5.7% vs 4.7%, respectively) and Popeye deformity (1.7% vs 1.0%, respectively) rates were similar between the groups. Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis had higher reoperation (3.0% vs 0.0%, respectively), wound complication (1.0% vs 0.0%, respectively), and nerve injury (0.7% vs 0.0%, respectively) rates postoperatively. A meta-analysis of 3 studies demonstrated that both methods had similar ASES scores (P = .36) as well as all-cause complication rates (odds ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.13-4.48]; P = .26).Conclusion:Patients undergoing arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis for either SLAP tears or LHBT abnormalities had similar outcome scores and complication rates compared with those undergoing open subpectoral biceps tenodesis. Additionally, both residual pain and Popeye deformity rates were similar between the 2 groups.

Acromioclavicular joint arthritis is not an indication for routine distal clavicle excision in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

To evaluate the significance of untreated primary acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) osteoarthritis, encountered during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR), as a cause of persistent symptomatology and need for revision surgery. In a cohort of 811 consecutive patients older than 55years who underwent RCR, the effect of primary ACJ osteoarthritis presence was prospectively examined. A total of 497 patients with mild/moderate and severe ACJ osteoarthritis based on preoperative MRI evaluation were allocated to Group A (n = 185, symptomatic ACJ) and Group B (n = 312, asymptomatic ACJ). Distal clavicle excision was not performed regardless of the presence of pain. The minimum follow-up was 28months (28-46). The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores were assessed for ACJ pain on palpation, the cross body adduction test, the Constant-Murley, and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES). The overall loss to follow-up rate was 3.82% (19 patients: 11 in Group A and eight in Group B). The mean ASES score at the latest follow-up was 91.16 ± 9.3 and 92.37 ± 10.44 in Groups A and B, respectively, and the mean Constant-Murley score was 96.36 ± 5.7 and 95.76 ± 4.6 in Groups A and B, respectively. There was no statistical significance between regarding both scores. Localised ACJ pain on palpation and pain on cross body adduction were diminished in both the symptomatic and asymptomatic group. There were five cases (1%: two in Group A and three in Group B) with persistent ACJ pain who had failed the conservative treatment, and ACJ excision was necessary to alleviate the symptoms. All revision operations were uncomplicated with symptom resolution. Untreated ACJ osteoarthritis, symptomatic or not, encountered during arthroscopic RCR is associated with a low percentage of failure. Routine distal clavicle excision is not absolutely necessary, even in patients with symptomatic ACJ osteoarthritis. II, Prospective cohort study.

Long-term Functional Outcomes of Nonoperatively Treated Highly Displaced Scapular Body and Neck Fractures.

Historically, extra-articular scapular body fractures were treated nonsurgically, but displaced fractures of the glenoid neck can lead to dysfunction. Controversy exists regarding which extra-articular scapular fractures should be treated surgically; however, nonsurgical management of severely displaced scapular body fractures can result in satisfactory outcomes. Inclusion criteria for this study were medial or lateral displacement greater than 2 cm, angular deformity between fracture fragments greater than 45°, or glenopolar angle less than 22°. Functional outcomes included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Short Form-36 (SF-36) score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were available for all patients. Range of motion (ROM), strength, other injuries, and complications also were recorded. Twelve patients (10 males, 2 females) with a mean age of 45.6 years (range, 29-57 years) underwent follow-up for a mean of 54.1 months (range, 28.2-74.4 months). At latest follow-up, mean DASH score was 8.9 (range, 0-35), mean SF-36 score was 72.2 (range, 57.3-96.1), and mean ASES score was 85.9 (range, 46.7-100). Mean ROM and strength expressed as a percentage of the contralateral side ranged from 88% to 99% and 70% to 93%, respectively. At longest follow-up, 10 patients reported excellent satisfaction with their treatment. There were no radiographic non-unions. One patient with concomitant clavicle and acromion fractures treated surgically had a postoperative infection requiring operative irrigation and debridement. None of the patients required or sought additional treatment. Nonoperative treatment of highly displaced scapular body fractures resulted in good patient satisfaction, satisfactory long-term functional outcomes, and only minor loss of motion and strength. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(3):e177-e181.].