MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory Research Articles

Developing and validating multi-omics prediction models for late patient-reported dysphagia in head and neck radiotherapy.

To investigate models developed using radiomic and dosiomic (multi-omics) features from planning and treatment imaging for late patient-reported dysphagia in head and neck radiotherapy.

Materials and methods: Training (n=64) and testing (n=23) cohorts of head and neck cancer patients treated with curative intent chemo-radiotherapy with a follow-up time greater than 12 months were retrospectively examined. Patients completed the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and a composite score ≤60 was interpreted as patient-reported dysphagia. A chart review collected baseline dysphagia and clinical factors. Multi-omic features were extracted from planning and last synthetic CT images using the pharyngeal constrictor muscle contours as a region of interest. Late patient-reported dysphagia models were developed using a random forest backbone, with feature selection and up-sampling methods to account for the imbalanced data. Models were developed and validated for multi-omic feature combinations for both timepoints. 

Results: A clinical and radiomic feature model developed using the planning CT achieved good performance (validation: sensitivity=80±27% / balanced accuracy=71±23%, testing: sensitivity =80±10% / balanced accuracy=73±11%). The synthetic CT models did not show improvement over the plan CT multi-omics models, with poor reliability of the radiomic features on these images. Dosiomic features extracted from the synthetic CT showed promise in predicting late patient-reported dysphagia.

Conclusion: Multi-omics models can predict late patient-reported dysphagia in head and neck radiotherapy patients. Synthetic CT dosiomic features show promise in developing successful models to account for changes in delivered dose distribution. Multi-center or prospective studies are required prior to clinical implementation of these models.&#xD.

Transoral Robotic Surgery and Radiation Volume Deintensification in Unknown Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Neck

Patients with unknown primary squamous cell carcinoma (CUP) with cervical metastases typically receive comprehensive radiotherapy (RT) of the pharynx and bilateral neck. Typically, these patients receive comprehensive RT of the pharynx and bilateral neck that may produce treatment-related toxic effects. To determine whether localization of occult oropharyngeal cancers with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) combined with reduced pharyngeal and neck RT volumes provides acceptable disease control. This phase 2, single-group nonrandomized controlled trial at a single institution accrued 32 prospective participants with p16-positive CUP without a primary squamous cell carcinoma on examination and imaging from 2017 to 2019, and 24-month follow-up. The data analysis was conducted from January 2021 to June 2022. Diagnostic- (n = 13) or therapeutic-intent (n = 9) TORS, with pharyngeal-sparing radiotherapy (PSRT) prescribed for negative margins or pT0, and unilateral neck RT (UNRT) prescribed for unilateral lymphadenopathy with lateralized primary tumor or pT0. Out-of-radiation treatment volume failure (<15% was hypothesized to be acceptable) and reports of local and regional recurrence, overall survival, toxic effects, swallowing outcomes (per the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory), and videofluoroscopic swallow (per Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxic Effects [DIGEST]) ratings. The study sample comprised 22 patients (mean [SD] age, 59.1 [5.7] years; 3 [14%] females and 19 [86%] male) with CUP. Of these, 19 patients (86%) had tumor stage cN1; 2 (9%), cN2; and 1 (5%), cN3. Five patients (23%), 14 patients (64%), and 3 patients (13%) had 0, 1, or 2 primary tumors, respectively. Twenty patients received RT; of these, 9 patients (45%) underwent PSRT and 10 patients (50%), UNRT. In the diagnostic-intent group, 8 patients (62%) and 5 patients (38%) underwent RT and RT-concurrent chemotherapy, respectively. In the therapeutic-intent group, 6 patients (67%) and 1 patient (11%) received adjuvant RT-concurrent chemotherapy, respectively; 2 patients declined RT. Two-year out-of-radiation treatment volume failure, locoregional control, distant metastasis control, and overall survival were 0%, 100%, 95%, and 100%, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 surgical, acute, and late toxic effects occurred in 2 (9%), 5 (23%), and 1 (5%) patients, respectively. PSRT was associated with lower RT dose to superior constrictors (37 vs 53 Gy; mean difference, 16 Gy; 95% CI, 6.4, 24.9), smaller decline in swallowing scores during treatment (19.3 vs 39.7; mean difference, -20.4; 95% CI, -34.1 to -6.1), and fewer patients with worsening DIGEST grade on findings of videofluoroscopic swallow studies at 2 years (0% vs 60%; difference, 60%; 95% CI, 30% to 90%). These findings indicate that TORS for p16-positive CUP allows RT volume deintensification with excellent outcomes and support future investigation in randomized clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03281499.

Assessment of patients with head and neck cancer using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory: Results of a study into its comprehensiveness, comprehensibility and relevance to clinical practice.

The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) which assesses dysphagia-related quality of life (QoL) in head and neck cancer (HNC). Despite its common use in HNC research and clinical practice, few of its psychometric properties have been reappraised since its inception. The aim of this study was to perform a survey-based qualitative analysis of UK HNC clinicians' perceptions of the content validity of the MDADI, evaluating it across the parameters of relevance, comprehensiveness and comprehensibility as per the COSMIN guideline for PROM assessment. Four themes relating to the content validity of the MDADI were identified: (1) MDADI items lack clarity of definition of the terms 'swallowing', 'eating' and 'dysphagia'; (2) the MDADI is perceived to be overly negative in tone including items that service users may find distressing or disempowering; (3) items in the tool are exclusory to specific subgroups of patients, such as those who are nil by mouth or socially isolated; and (4) modifications to the MDADI were suggested and encouraged to make it more clinically useful and patient-centred. This study indicates that MDADI's content validity is 'insufficient' when rated by COSMIN parameters. This has significant implications for its continued use in HNC research and clinical practice. Further re-evaluation of the content validity of the MDADI is warranted, with potential future amendment of items being indicated if the results of this study are corroborated in subsequent research. What is already known on the subject The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) patient-reported outcome measure of dysphagia-related quality of life is widely used in clinical practice and international clinical trials. Content validity is considered to be the most important property of a tool when assessing its psychometric strengths and weaknesses; however, the MDADI's content validity has not been reappraised since its initial development. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This study presents UK speech and language therapists' opinions and experience of the content validity of the MDADI and this first reappraisal of its content validity since its initial development highlights several issues with this psychometric parameter of the tool. This study highlights that further re-evaluation of the content validity of the MDADI is warranted, with potential future amendment of items being indicated if the results of this study are corroborated in subsequent research. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Clinicians cannot assume that commonly used outcomes tools have strong psychometric profiles. Consideration of the content validity of outcomes tools during selection for use in clinical and research practice should be key, as this will encourage use of tools that produce relevant, valid data that can contribute meaningfully to patient-centred care.

Quality of life of patients treated with robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region: a scoping review of empirical evidence

BackgroundThere is a blooming trend in the application of robotic surgery in oral and maxillofacial care, and different studies had evaluated the quality of life (QoL) outcomes among patients who underwent robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region. However, empirical evidence on the QoL outcomes from these procedures is yet to be mapped. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the available scientific evidence and gaps concerning the QoL outcomes of patients treated with robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region.MethodsThis study adopted a scoping review design, and it was conducted and reported based on the Arksey and O’Malley, PRISMA-ScR, and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and APA PsycINFO were searched to retrieve relevant literature. Using Rayyan software, the retrieved literature were deduplicated, and screened based on the review’s eligibility criteria. Only the eligible articles were included in the review. From the included articles, relevant data were charted, collated, and summarized.ResultsA total of 123 literature were retrieved from the literature search. After deduplication and screening, only 18 heterogeneous original articles were included in the review. A total of 771 transoral robotic surgeries (TORSs) were reported in these articles, and the TORSs were conducted on patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas (OPC), recurrent tonsillitis, and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In total, 20 different QoL instruments were used in these articles to assess patients’ QoL outcomes, and the most used instrument was the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory Questionnaire (MDADI). Physical functions related to swallowing, speech and salivary functions were the most assessed QoL aspects. TORS was reported to result in improved QOL in patients with OPC, OSA, and recurrent tonsillitis, most significantly within the first postoperative year. Notably, the site of the lesion, involvement of neck dissections and the characteristics of the adjuvant therapy seemed to affect the QOL outcome in patients with OPC.ConclusionCompared to the conventional treatment modalities, TORS has demonstrated better QoL, mostly in the domains related to oral functions such as swallowing and speech, among patients treated with such. This improvement was most evident within the initial post-operative year.

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Persian Version of the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory.

Introduction  Dysphagia is a common issue in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and is known to negatively impact their quality of life. To evaluate the impact of dysphagia on the quality of life of HNC patients, the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire was developed. Objective  The present study aimed to culturally adapt and validate the MDADI for Persian-speaking individuals. The MDADI is a self-administered questionnaire designed to assess the impact of dysphagia on the quality of life of HNC patients. Methods  The original MDADI questionnaire was translated into Persian using the forward-backward method, following the guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO) for cultural adaptation. The content validity of the Persian version, MDADI-P, was assessed by 10 speech-language pathologists using the content validity index (CVI). Seventy-five HNC patients completed the MDADI-P to evaluate its convergent validity, which was determined by comparing the results with the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach α coefficient and intraclass correlation (ICC), respectively. Results  The scale content validity index (S-CVI) for the MDADI-P was 0.90, indicating good content validity. The MDADI-P demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach α coefficient = 0.728) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91). The total MDADI-P score exhibited a significant correlation with the physical and mental components of the SF-36 (0.456 and 0.349, respectively, p  < 0.05). Conclusion  The findings of the present study confirm the suitability of the MDADI-P in terms of content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability.

Nature, severity, and impact of chronic oropharyngeal dysphagia following curative resection for esophageal cancer: a cross-sectional study.

Chronic oropharyngeal dysphagia (COD) and aspiration after esophageal cancer surgery may have clinical significance; however, it is a rarely studied topic. In a prospective cross-sectional observational study we comprehensively evaluated the nature, severity, and impact of COD, its predictors, and the impact of the surgical approach and site of anastomosis. Forty participants were recruited via purposive sampling from the (Irish) National Center between November 2021 and August 2022. Swallow evaluations included videofluoroscopy [Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity v2 (DIGESTv2), MBS Impairment Profile, Penetration-Aspiration Scale)]. Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) identified oral intake status. The patient reported outcome measures of swallowing, and Quality of Life (QL) included EAT-10 and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Fourteen (35%) participants presented with COD on DIGESTv2 and 10% had uncleared penetration/aspiration. Avoidance or modification of diet on FOIS was observed in 17 (42.5%). FOIS was associated with pharyngeal dysphagia (OR = 4.05, P = 0.046). Median (range) EAT-10 and MDADI Composite results were 3(0-30) and 77.9(60-92.6), respectively. Aspiration rates significantly differed across surgical groups (P = 0.029); only patients undergoing transhiatal surgery aspirated. Survivors of esophageal cancer surgery may have COD that is undiagnosed, potentially impacting swallow-related QL. Given the small number of aspirators, further research is required to determine whether aspiration risk is associated with surgical approach. A FOIS score below 7 may be a clinically useful prompt for the MDT to refer for evaluation of COD following curative intent surgery. These data present findings that may guide preventive and rehabilitative strategies toward optimizing survivorship.

Pharyngeal Constrictor Dose–Volume Histogram Metrics and Patient-Reported Dysphagia in Head and Neck Radiotherapy

AimsHead and neck radiotherapy long-term survival continues to improve and the management of long-term side-effects is moving to the forefront of patient care. Dysphagia is associated with dose to the pharyngeal constrictors and can be measured using patient-reported outcomes to evaluate its effect on quality of life. The aim of the present study was to relate pharyngeal constrictor dose–volume parameters with patient-reported outcomes to identify prognostic dose constraints. Materials and methodsA 64-patient training cohort and a 24-patient testing cohort of oropharynx and nasopharynx cancer patients treated with curative-intent chemoradiotherapy were retrospectively examined. These patients completed the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory outcome survey at 12 months post-radiotherapy to evaluate late dysphagia: a composite score lower than 60 indicated dysphagia. The pharyngeal constrictor muscles were subdivided into four substructures: superior, middle, inferior and cricopharyngeal. Dose–volume histogram (DVH) metrics for each of the structure combinations were extracted. A decision tree classifier was run for each DVH metric to identify dose constraints optimising the accuracy and sensitivity of the cohort. A 60% accuracy threshold and feature selection method were used to ensure statistically significant DVH metrics were identified. These dose constraints were then validated on the 24-patient testing cohort. ResultsExisting literature dose constraints only had two dose constraints performing above 60% accuracy and sensitivity when evaluated on our training cohort. We identified two well-performing dose constraints: the pharyngeal constrictor muscle D63% < 55 Gy and the superior–middle pharyngeal constrictor combination structure V31Gy < 100%. Both dose constraints resulted in ≥73% mean accuracy and ≥80% mean sensitivity on the training and testing patient cohorts. In addition, a pharyngeal constrictor muscle mean dose <57 Gy resulted in a mean accuracy ≥74% and mean sensitivity ≥60%. ConclusionMid-dose pharyngeal constrictor muscle and substructure combination dose constraints should be used in the treatment planning process to reduce late patient-reported dysphagia.

Analysis of swallowing and voice-related quality of life in patients after supracricoid partial laryngectomy

ObjectiveThis study evaluated the swallowing and voice function of laryngeal cancer patients after Supracricoid Partial Laryngectomy(SCPL), and its influence on quality of life to provide a reference for the selection of surgical methods for laryngeal cancer patients.MethodsTwenty-one patients who received SCPL between April 2015 and November 2021 were included. Each patient’s swallowing function and quality of life were assessed through fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) and the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Fundamental, jitter, shimmer, maximum phonation time (MPT), and voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10) were performed to assess voice function and voice-related quality of life.ResultsThe results of the FEES of the 21 patients were as follows: the rates of pharyngeal residue after swallowing solid, semiliquid, and liquid food were 0%, 28.57%, and 38.09%, respectively; the rates of laryngeal infiltration after swallowing solid, semiliquid, and liquid food were 0%, 28.57%, and 4.76%, respectively; and aspiration did not occur in any of the patients. In the evaluation of swallowing quality of life, the mean total MDADI score was 92.6 ± 6.32. The voice function evaluation showed that the mean F0, jitter, shimmer, and MPT values were 156.01 ± 120.87 (HZ), 11.57 ± 6.21 (%), 35.37 ± 14.16 (%) and 7.85 ± 6.08 (s), respectively. The mean total VHI-10 score was 7.14 ± 4.84.ConclusionSCPL provides patients with satisfactory swallowing and voice function. The patients in this study were satisfied with their quality of life in terms of swallowing and voice. SCPL can be used as a surgical method to preserve laryngeal function in patients with laryngeal cancer.

Overall survival, disease-free survival and quality of life in patients affected by HPV mediated p16+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with upfront trans-oral robotic surgery vs radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.

Treatment de-intensification for p16 + oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is an area of active research to reduce the side effects and improve patients' quality of life (QoL). In this paper we evaluated the Overall Survival (OS), the Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and the QoL of patients affected by p16 + OPSCC according to their prognostic stage group (PSG) and different treatments. Patients were selected retrospectively through our Electronic Tumor Board Database according to prespecified inclusion criteria. Basic data of eligible patients were recorded and analyzed. Then, OS and DFS were evaluated according to the PSG and the treatments performed. Patients alive completed three questionnaires: the QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), the QoL Questionnaire Head & Neck 43 (QLQ-HN43) and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire. Sixty-one patients were included in this study. Eight patients died from the disease and the remaining 53 patients completed the 3 questionnaires. Fifteen (25%) patients were treated with upfront surgery, 6 (10%) patients with definitive radiotherapy and 40 (65%) patients with concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Comparing the DFS and the OS of PSG I patients by the different treatments performed, no statistically significant difference was identified. Patients treated with upfront surgery showed better outcomes in some aspects of their QoL. For p16 + OPSCC PSG I patients, upfront surgery can be considered a valid alternative to radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy while maintaining a comparable DFS and OS and giving patients better results in terms of specific aspects of their QoL.

Assessment of Oncosurgical and Functional Outcomes in Patients undergoing Glossectomy for Advanced Carcinoma Tongue: A Cross-sectional Study at a Tertiary Cancer Care Centre in Northern India

Introduction: Tongue carcinoma presents a global oncological challenge due to its aggressive nature and late-stage diagnosis. Glossectomy, a key surgical procedure for advanced cases, significantly affects both cancer control and essential functions such as speech and swallowing. Aim: To analyse the impact of different glossectomy types on oncological and functional outcomes in patients with advanced carcinoma of the tongue. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Research Institute, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Uttarakhand, India over a one-year period from September 1, 2022, to August 31, 2023. The study included 47 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral and posterior tongue who underwent glossectomy. Oncological outcomes (mortality and hospital stay) and functional outcomes (swallowing, speech, dysphagia, and Quality of Life (QoL)) were assessed. The questionnaires used were the EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30), EORTC questionnaire for the assessment of QoL in head and neck cancer patients (EORTC QLQ-H&amp;N35), M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and Speech Handicap Index (SHI). Follow-up was conducted at the 6th week to assess changes in the functional aspects compared to the baseline scores. Data were entered into Microsoft Excel, and the analysis was performed using Statistical Packages for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 25.0. The data were analysed using the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. A p-value of &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The study comprised 37 (78.72%) males and 10 (21.28%) females, with a mean age of 47.77±12.6 years. Preoperative staging indicated that 22 (46.81%) patients had T2N0 stage, 16 (34.04%) patients had T3, and 9 (19.15%) patients had T4a disease. Among the patients, 14 (29.79%) underwent partial glossectomy, 27 (57.45%) underwent hemiglossectomy, and 3 (6.38%) underwent subtotal glossectomy, and 3 (6.38%) underwent total glossectomy. The mean duration of hospital stay was 10.09±2.87 days. There were no instances of mortality or tumour recurrence at the 6th week. Regarding the functional outcomes, compared to baseline, at the 6th week, there was a significant decrease in EORTC QLQ-H&amp;N35 median scores from 6.94 to 1.73 (p=0.005), but no significant change in the mean EORTC QLQ-C30 (90±8.22 versus (vs) 89.72±8.52, p=0.368), mean MDADI (4.51±1.2 vs 4.43±1.19, p=0.585), and mean SHI (15.81±25.76 vs 13.43±26.19, p=0.052). Conclusion: It can be inferred that glossectomy for advanced carcinoma of the tongue leads to a significant improvement in symptoms; however, the overall Quality of Life (QoL) and functions of the tongue such as swallowing and speech remain comparable to pre-surgery levels.

How age affects health-related-quality-of-life outcomes in maxillomandibular reconstructive surgery.

Maxillomandibular reconstruction has various functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial effects that can decrease patients' health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The aim of this study was to compare HRQOL outcomes in older and younger patients undergoing maxillomandibular reconstruction. A cross-sectional study of patients undergoing maxillomandibular reconstruction surgery between November 2008 and January 2021 was conducted. Participants completed the FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer Module, M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and Speech Handicap Index (SHI). Results from these instruments were used to compare HRQOL outcomes in old (≥70 years) and young (<70 years) patients. Ninety-nine patients who underwent maxillomandibular reconstruction completed the instruments (response rate 50%), of which 33 (33%) were aged ≥70 years. Older age was associated with improved FACE-Q speaking (+11.3, P = 0.045), FACE-Q cancer worry (-9.97, P = 0.050), and SHI score (-16.6, P = 0.013). After adjusting for the effect of radiotherapy, age was associated with improved FACE-Q speaking (+16.8, P = 0.012), FACE-Q smiling distress (+12.6, P = 0.040), FACE-Q worry (-11.0, P = 0.032), and SHI scores (-18.4, P = 0.004). Older age was associated with an increased likelihood of postoperative complications (odds ratio (OR) = 2.9, P = 0.02) and medical complications (OR = 4.6, P = 0.012). In patients undergoing maxillomandibular reconstruction, older age (≥70 years) was associated with better HRQOL outcomes in domains relating to speech and cancer worry. In all other HRQOL outcomes, the two age groups performed similarly.

Quality of Life After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharynx Cancer

Efforts are underway to deintensified treatment protocols for patients with human papillomavirus virus-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) to achieve similar excellent oncologic outcomes while reducing treatment-related adverse effects. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) as primary treatment often requires adjuvant therapy due to the high incidence of nodal metastasis. Treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by TORS and neck dissection (NECTORS), reserving radiation therapy for salvage, yields excellent oncologic outcomes. To assess patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and functional outcomes among patients with HPV-OPSCC who undergo NECTORS. This was a multicenter prospective cohort study of patients with HPV-OPSCC treated with the NECTORS protocol in 2017 to 2022. Consecutive patients with stage III or IVa HPV-OPSCC treated with NECTORS in 2017 to 2022 who had completed the primary QOL questionnaire at baseline and at least once during the 24-month follow-up period were included. Ninety-four patients were eligible, and 67 were included in the analyses. QOL questionnaires at baseline, and at month 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 posttreatment. Global score on the 30-item European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was the primary outcome; the head and neck extension module (EORTC QLQ-HN35); the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory for dysphagia-related QOL; and the Decision Regret Scale were also used. Paired t tests assessed change between the baseline and 12- or 24-month patient-reported outcomes. Among the study population of 67 patients (median [range] age, 63 [58-67] years; 54 [80.6%] male) with HPV-OPSCC, the most frequent cancer subsites were palatine tonsil (41 [61%]) and base of tongue (26 [39%]); none required adjuvant RT. Global QOL at 24 months improved compared with baseline (mean difference, 9.49; 95% CI, 2.45 to 16.53). All EORTC QLQ-C30 functional scores returned to baseline or improved within 3 to 6 months posttreatment and remained stable at 24 months. EORTC QLQ-HN35 symptom scale scores improved or were stable at 24 months. The MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores demonstrated no significant difference between baseline and month 12 for global scores (mean difference, 6.15; 95% CI, -4.18 to 16.49) and composite scores (mean difference, 2.73; 95% CI, -1.62 to 7.09). Median (range) score on the Decision Regret Scale was 5 of 100 (0-30), representing mild overall regret. The findings of this multicenter cohort study indicate that use of the NECTORS protocol is associated with excellent QOL outcomes. QOL measures returned to baseline levels or were better than baseline, which represents positive outcomes for patients with HPV-OPSCC who undergo this treatment regimen.

Head and Neck Cancer: A Study on the Complex Relationship between QoL and Swallowing Function.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is linked to significant morbidity, adversely affecting survival and functional capacity. Post-treatment challenges such as pain, dysphonia, and dysphagia are common, prompting increased attention in survivorship research. Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaires, especially the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), are prevalent outcome measures in clinical studies but often lack parallel objective swallowing function evaluations, leading to potential outcome discrepancies. This study aimed to illuminate the relationship between subjective QoL (EQ-5D-5L and MDADI) measures and objective swallowing function (evaluated via Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing, FEES) in patients with HNSCC. The analysis revealed a notable discordance between objective measures of swallowing function, such as the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) and residue ratings in the vallecula or piriform sinus, and patients' subjective QoL assessments (p = 0.21). Despite the lack of correlation, swallowing-related QoL, as measured by the MDADI, was more indicative of disease severity than generic QoL assessments. Generic QoL scores did not demonstrate substantial variation between patients. In contrast, MDADI scores significantly declined with advancing tumor stage, multimodal therapy, and reliance on feeding tubes. However, the clinical significance of this finding was tempered by the less than 10-point difference in MDADI scores. The findings of this study underline the limitations of QoL measures as standalone assessments in patients with HNSCC, given their reliance on patient-perceived impairment. While subjective QoL is a crucial aspect of evaluating therapeutic success and patient-centric outcomes, it may fail to capture critical clinical details such as silent aspirations. Consequently, QoL assessments should be augmented by objective evaluations of swallowing function in clinical research and practice to ensure a holistic understanding of patient well-being and treatment impact.

Perioperative change trajectories and predictors of swallowing function and swallowing-related quality of life in patients with oral cancer: a longitudinal observational study

ObjectiveTo determine change trajectories and predictors of swallowing function and swallowing-related quality of life (QoL) in perioperative patients with oral cancer.DesignLongitudinal observational study.SettingA tertiary cancer hospital in Hunan Province, China.ParticipantsPatients...

Early Voice and Swallowing Disturbance Incidence and Risk Factors After Revision Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a Multidisciplinary Surgical Approach: A Retrospective Cohort Evaluation of a Prospective Database.

Dysphagia and vocal cord palsy (VCP) are common otolaryngological complications after revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (rACDF) procedures. Our objective was to determine the early incidence and risk factors of VCP and dysphagia after rACDF using a 2-team approach. Single-institution, retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of patients undergoing rACDF was enrolled from September 2010 to July 2021. Of 222 patients enrolled, 109 patients were included in the final analysis. All patients had prior ACDF surgery with planned revision using a single otolaryngologist and single neurosurgeon. MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) were used to assess dysphagia. VCP was assessed using videolaryngostroboscopy. Seven patients (6.7%) developed new postoperative VCP after rACDF. Most cases of VCP resolved by 3 months postoperatively (mean time-to-resolution 79 ± 17.6 days). One patient maintained a permanent deficit. Forty-one patients (37.6%) reached minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in their MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory composite scores at the 2-week follow-up (MCID decline of ≥6), indicating new clinically relevant swallowing disturbance. Forty-nine patients (45.0%) had functional FEES Performance Score decline. On univariate analysis, there was an association between new VCPs and the number of cervical levels treated at revision ( P = .020) with long-segment rACDF (≥4 levels) being an independent risk factor ( P = .010). On linear regression, there was an association between the number of levels treated previously and at revision for FEES Performance Score decline ( P = .045 and P = .002, respectively). However, on univariate analysis, sex, age, body mass index, operative time, alcohol use, smoking, and individual levels revised were not risk factors for reaching FEES Performance Score decline nor MCID at 2 weeks postoperatively. VCP is more likely to occur in long-segment rACDF but is often temporary. Clinically relevant and functional rates of dysphagia approach 37% and 45%, respectively, at 2 weeks postoperatively after rACDF.

Abstract PO-049: The neural landscape is associated with functional outcomes for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract Despite the excellent prognosis of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), long-term functional impairment (e.g., dysphagia) is a major burden for many patients. Recent studies have explored the role of pharyngeal constrictors and muscle fibrosis in dysphagia. However, to date, no study has examined the association between the OPSCC neural microenvironment and posttreatment functional impairment. We hypothesized that cancer-related neuronal changes in the OPSCC tumor microenvironment (TME) would affect patients’ prognoses. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated whether cancer-related changes in the tumor neuronal microenvironment influence functional outcomes in patients with OPSCC. Prospectively collected, patient-reported outcomes (i.e., from the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory [MDASI] and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory [MDADI]) and functional outcomes from the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity [DIGEST] for patients with OPSCC were collected (n=29). OPSCC tissue samples were obtained from surgically treated patients, and multiplex/high-plex immunofluorescence and machine learning techniques were used to correlate neuronal changes with prospectively collected patient data. Electromyography was performed to assess the neuronal populations involved in neuropathies after treatment. A murine animal model of dysphagia was also used to correlate the neuronal changes. The results showed that sensory nerves with adrenergic features (CGRP+TH+) were associated with perineural and lymphovascular invasion. In addition, we found that human papillomavirus associated OPSCC was associated with an enrichment of parasympathetic progenitors (VIP+DCX+). Poor MDASI scores were associated with CGRP+, adrenergic (TH+), or CGRP+TH+ innervation, and growing progenitor neurons (GAP43+DCX+) were associated with improved oral symptoms. Swallowing, measured by MDADI scale revealed that patients with tumors enriched with growing (GAP43+), parasympathetic (VIP+), and neuronal progenitor (DCX+) neurons reported poor swallowing perception; subgroup electromyography analysis confirmed our findings. Quantitative swallowing assessment with DIGEST by speech language pathologists revealed that TMEs innervated by CGRP+, TH+, and MBP+ neurons were associated with poor swallowing functions. Finally, using a murine model of dysphagia we confirmed that sensory (CGRP+), myelinated (MBP+), and cholinergic parasympathetic (CHAT+) or progenitor (CHAT+DCX+) enrichment was associated with denervation and downstream dysphagia. In conclusion, our results show that neuronal changes are correlated with clinical features in OPSCC patients. Patients’ functional outcomes after therapy completion are influenced by distinct nerve populations in the TME. These benchmark data should be further evaluated as a potential target for cancer survivors with dysphagia and as a biomarker for patients who might need escalated swallowing rehabilitation during and after treatment for OPSCC. Citation Format: Shajedul Islam, Frederico O. Gleber-Netto, Collin F. Mulcahy, Mica D. E. Glaun, Patrick J. Hunt, Michelle D. Williams, Carly E. Barbon, Weilu Zhao, Adewale Adebayo, Shamima Akhter, Tongxin Xie, Ismail Yaman, Jared K. Burks, Javier Gomez, Karin Woodman, Teresa E. Lever, Katherine A. Hutcheson, Moran Amit. The neural landscape is associated with functional outcomes for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-AHNS Head and Neck Cancer Conference: Innovating through Basic, Clinical, and Translational Research; 2023 Jul 7-8; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2023;29(18_Suppl):Abstract nr PO-049.

An inquisitive exploration on perceived dysphagia, cognition and health-related quality of life in geriatrics

The increasing aging population worldwide is one of the main issues of today. According to the 2011 census, there were 103 million senior citizen i.e about 8.6% of the India’s population. According to data from the U. N Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA), the proportion of people over 60 will increase from 7.5% in 2010 to 11.1% in 2025. The NSSO 2002 report, the old population is expected to increase to 158.7 million by 2025, rising at a rate that is roughly twice as fast as the general population associated with Perceived Dysphagia, Cognition and Health-Related Quality of Life in Geriatrics populations.Dysphagia is becomes an important common problem for the geriatric population. While Presbyphagia is a term that refers to the distinctive age-related changes that occur in the swallowing mechanism of otherwise healthy older adults. It is well defined that in acutely ill elderly populations, the prevalence and quality-of-life changes associated with dysphagia remain unstable poor health conditions. The present study attempt “To investigate an Inquisitive Exploration on Perceived Dysphagia, Cognition and Health-Related Quality of Life in Geriatrics”.A total of 300 participants were included in the study. The participants within the study were all inhabitants of Pondicherry. The individual with geriatric inclusion was 70 years old and above at the time of participation. Two validated questionnaires were used namely the M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and the general health Short Form-12 survey (SF-12v2) was administered to assess the impact of dysphagia-age related aspects on overall health. Both the questionnaires were self-administered and widely used in assessing cognitive function among the elderly, it includes orientation, attention, memory, language, and visuospatial skills.The study outcome concluded that there is a relatively high prevalence of dysphagia in the community-based geriatric population; significant quality-of-life impairment is a frequent finding. General health measures do not appear to be sensitive to swallowing-related quality of life but finally, individuals may inaccurately ascribe swallowing problems to normal aging, supporting the role of community education about dysphagia in the elderly.

Decisional regret, symptom burden, and quality of life following transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer

BackgroundTransoral robotic surgery (TORS) has equivalent oncologic control to radiotherapy with potential for improved quality of life (QOL) and lower patient-reported decisional regret. MethodsCross-sectional study between 2016 and 2021 of TORS patients with early-stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma who completed the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and University of Washington Quality of Life (UW-QOL). The median time from treatment to questionnaire completion was 1.8 years (IQR 1.4–3.3, range 1.0–5.6). ResultsOf 65 patients, 84.6% expressed no or mild decisional regret. Regret was not associated with clinical parameters or adjuvant treatment but was correlated with MDADI (τavg = −0.23, p < 0.001) and UW-QOL (τavg = −0.27, p < 0.001). Worse MDADI was associated with older age and worse UW-QOL was associated with multi-site operation and shorter time to survey. ConclusionsOverall, the TORS cohort expressed very limited decisional regret. DRS scores were unaffected by clinicodemographics or additional adjuvant therapies, but decision regret was correlated with worse QOL and worse swallowing.

Selective Treatment Deintensification by Reducing Radiation Dose and Omitting Concurrent Chemotherapy Based on Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm, Phase 2 Trial (IChoice-01)

To demonstrate the feasibility of deintensification regimen in the light of the response to induction chemotherapy (IC) in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Patients with p16+ OPSCC, T1-2/N1-3M0 (excluding T1N1M0 with single and ≤3 cm lymph node) or T3-4N0-3M0 were enrolled between January 2019 and July 2021. All patients received 2 cycles of IC with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 dL and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 dL every 3 weeks. Those with major responses (≥50% decrease in both primary and lymph nodes) to IC entered the deintensification cohort (cohort D), in which intensity modulated radiation therapy alone was given to a reduced dose of 60 Gy/30 fractions. Those who failed to meet major responsesentered the concurrent chemoradiotherapy cohort (cohort C), where the dose was simultaneously integrated boosted to a standard 70 Gy/35 fractions to nonmajor response sites, concurrently with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 dL,22. Patient-reported swallow function was documented using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) using Simon's 2 stage design. A total of 26 of 48 (54.2%) participants met the criteria to enter cohort D and 22 of 48 (45.8%) patients entered cohort C. With a median follow-up time of 29.7 months (6.9-48.0 months), 2-year PFS and OS rates were 85.4% and 93.6%, respectively for all enrolled patients. In cohort D, 2-year PFS and OS rates were both 100%. Grade 3 and 4 IC-related toxicities included leukopenia/neutropenia occurring in 41.7% and hyponatremia in 4.2% of patients. A higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 mucositis (61.9% vs 23.1% P=.022) was observed in cohort C. Consistent decline in longitudinal MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores were observed at month 3 after radiation therapy between cohorts and both were found to recover to baseline at month 12. Selective radiation therapy dose reduction and concurrent chemotherapy removal based on IC response in HPV+OPSCC was feasible and promising. Further study of this strategy to balance efficacy and toxicity is warranted in a prospective controlled trial.

[Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing health-related quality of life in patients with voice and swallowing disorders].

Standardized and validated patient surveys in the form of questionnaires are becoming increasingly important in otorhinolaryngology. Subjective symptoms and functional limitations but also health-related quality of life are assessed with so-called patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Besides patient history and objective findings, these questionnaires can be applied as another important source for ensuring the quality of patient-centered care. In German-speaking countries there are now several PROMs that specifically ask for the patient perspective on voice and swallowing disorders. For patients with voice disorders the following questionnaires based on the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), which are also used internationally, are mainly applied: VHI-30, VHI-12i, and VHI-9i. In the field of oropharyngeal dysphagia, the German versions of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10), des Sydney Swallow Questionnaire SSQ‑G, the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire (SWAL-QoL), and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) are currently mostly used.