McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope Research Articles

Impact of universal use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope as the first option for all intubations in the operating room: The multicentre prospective before-after VIDEOLAR-SURGERY study protocol

IntroductionStandard tracheal intubation performed in the operating room is based on direct laryngoscopy using a standard Macintosh laryngoscope. Several authors recommend the universal use of a video laryngoscope as the first option for all intubations, regardless of whether the patient has predictors of a difficult airway or not. We hypothesize that using the McGrath video laryngoscope as the first intubation option increases the frequency of patients with easy intubation, and decreases intubation-related complications. Methods and analysisThe VIDEOLAR-SURGERY trial is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, interventional, before-after study. In the pre-implementation period (non-interventional phase, 6-9 months [2600 intubations]), 35 anaesthesiologists from 8 hospitals perform all tracheal intubations for an elective or urgent surgical procedure using the standard Macintosh direct laryngoscope as the first intubation option. During the implementation period (2 months), each anaesthesiologist is given a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope and trained in its use. During the post-implementation period (interventional-phase, 6-9 months [2600 intubations]), the 35 anaesthesiologists perform all tracheal intubations using a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope as the first intubation option. The main objective of this study is to evaluate whether the use of a McGrath Mac video laryngoscope as the first intubation option increases the percentage of patients with easy intubation compared with the standard Macintosh laryngoscope. Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol was approved on 2 May 2023 by the Ethics Committee of Galicia, Spain (CEI-SL, code No. 2023-177), and was registered on the Clinicaltrials.gov clinical trials registry under No. NCT NCT05850260. Informed consent is required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences. If video laryngoscopy improves easy intubation compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscopy in all operating room intubations, its use may well become standard practice, thereby decreasing the risks of intubation-related complications.

Impacto del uso universal del videolaringoscopio McGrath como primera opción para todas las intubaciones en el quirófano: protocolo del estudio prospectivo, multicéntrico VIDEOLAR-SURGERY con metodología pre-post

IntroductionUsual tracheal intubation performed in the operating room is based on direct laryngoscopy, using a standard Macintosh laryngoscope. Several authors recommend the universal use of a videolaryngoscope as the first option for all intubations, regardless of whether the patient has predictors of a difficult airway or not. We hypothesize that using the McGrath videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option increases the frequency of patients with easy intubation, and decreases complications associated to the intubation. Methods and analysisThe VIDEOLAR-SURGERY trial is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, interventional, before-after study. In the pre-implementation period (non-interventional phase, 6-9months [2600 intubations]), 35 anesthesiologists from 8hospitals perform all tracheal intubations for an elective or urgent surgical procedure using the standard Macintosh direct laryngoscope as the first intubation option. During the implementation period (2months), a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope is provided to each anesthesiologist to train in its use. During the post-implementation period (interventional-phase, 6-9months [2600 intubations]), the 35 anesthesiologists perform all tracheal intubations using a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option. The main objective of present study is to evaluate whether the use of a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option, improves the percentage of patients with easy intubation compared with the standard Macintosh laryngoscope. Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol was approved May 2, 2023, by the Ethics Committee of Galicia, Spain (CEI-SL, code No. 2023-177), and was registered into the Clinicaltrials.gov clinical trials registry with No. NCT NCT05850260. Informed consent is required. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences. If videolaryngoscope improves easy intubation compared with Macintosh direct laryngoscope when it is used for all intubations in operating room, its use may will become standard practice, thereby decreasing complications associated with the intubation procedure.

Impact of Universal Use of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope as a Device for All Intubations in the Cardiac Operating Room. A Prospective Before-After VIDEOLAR-CAR Study

Tracheal intubation in cardiac surgery patients has a higher incidence of difficult laryngoscopic views compared with patients undergoing other types of surgery. The authors hypothesized that using the McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option for cardiac surgery patients improves the percentage of patients with "easy intubation" compared with using a direct Macintosh laryngoscope. A prospective, observational, before-after study. At a tertiary-care hospital. One thousand one hundred nine patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery were intubated using, as the first option, a Macintosh laryngoscope (preinterventional phase) or a McGrath Mac videolaryngoscope (interventional phase). The main objective was to assess whether the use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope, as the first intubation option, improves the percentage of patients with "easy intubation," defined as successful intubation on the first attempt, modified Cormack-Lehane grades of I or IIa, and the absence of the need for adjuvant airway devices. A total of 1,109 patients were included, 801 in the noninterventional phase and 308 in the interventional phase. The incidence of "easy intubation" was 93% in the interventional phase versus 78% in the noninterventional phase (p < 0.001). First-success-rate intubation was higher in the interventional phase (304/308; 98.7%) compared with the noninterventional phase (754/801, 94.1%; p = 0.005). Intubation in the interventional phase showed decreases in the incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (12/308 [3.9%] v 157/801 [19.6%]; p < 0.001), as well as moderate or difficult intubation (5/308 [1.6%] v 57/801 [7.1%]; p < 0.001). The use of the McGrath videolaryngoscope as the first intubation option for tracheal intubation in cardiac surgery improves the percentage of patients with "easy" intubation," increasing glottic view and first-success-rate intubation and decreasing the incidence of moderate or difficult intubation.

Effect of Video laryngoscope on Tp-e Interval, Qtc and Tp-e/Qtc Ratio Compared with Direct Laryngoscope in Patients With Double-Lumen Tube Undergoing Thoracic Surgery

Aim: QT interval is generally related to the increased risk of polymorphic ventricular tachycardias and ventricular arrythmias. Intubation and laryngoscopy might change in cardiac repolarization and an increase in QT interval length. Video laryngoscopes provide better laryngeal view, higher intubation success, and better correct positioning on double-lumen tube (DLT) intubation. We aimed to compare McGRATH MAC 5 video laryngoscope to direct Macintosh laryngoscope and their effects on Tp-e interval, QTc and Tp-e/QTc ration in those patients requiring intubation having DLT. Materials and Methods: The randomly controlled prospective work is carried out on 94 patients, scheduled for thoracic surgery, aged between 18-65. After anaesthetic induction and before tracheal intubation, all patients airway were evaluated Cormack and Lehane in using a Macintosh laryngoscope and patients having Cormack and Lehane grade-1 or -2a views included in study. The patients who are intubated with video laryngoscope (McGRATH MAC) are allocated into Group V and intubated with direct Macintosh Laryngoscope was allocated into Group L. The primary aim was compared between the two devices on Tp-e interval, QTc and Tp-e/QTc ratio with ECG recordings. The secondary goal was assessment of hemodynamic status and intubation conditions. Results: In Group V, QTc interval, Tp-e intreval and Tp-e/QTc ratio was lower in a significant way than Group L. There has not been a significant difference in terms of hemodynamic assessment among those two groups at all measurement periods. Cormack-Lehane scores, intubation times, DLT types and sizes were similar between two groups. Conclusion: McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope decreased Tp-e interval, QTc and Tp-e/QTc ratio compared to direct Maintosh laryngoscope. Hemodynamic response and intubation parameters are seen as similar to each other in both of the present groups.

Comparison of the Effectiveness of the Miller Laryngoscope and the McGrath-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Direct Visualization of the Glottic Opening.

Background and Objective: Placing the laryngoscope blade directly under the epiglottis (known as the direct view (DV) method) during videolaryngoscopy offers a superior view of the glottis when compared to the indirect method of lifting the epiglottis by positioning the Macintosh blade tip over the vallecula. While there are few studies comparing glottic views using Miller and Macintosh blades in pediatric patients, we have not come across such a study in adults. In this study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and hemodynamic responses of the Miller laryngoscope and the McGrath-MAC videolaryngoscope (VL) in visualizing the glottic opening using the DV method. Material and Methods: A prospective study was conducted between August and December 2022 at XXX Hospital on 85 patients scheduled for surgical procedures involving endotracheal intubation. Patients were divided into two groups: Miller laryngoscope (Group M) and McGrath-MAC videolaryngoscope (Group VL) and intubated using the direct lifting method of the epiglottis. Hemodynamic responses before and after induction, as well as during laryngoscopy, intubation time, number of attempts, Cormack and Lehane (C&L) score, percentage of glottic opening (POGO), duration of the view of the opening, and need for external laryngeal pressure during intubation were recorded. Results: Both laryngoscopes showed similar effectiveness in terms of POGO and C&L score when used with the direct lifting method of the epiglottis. The median POGO values according to the DV method were 80% in Group M and 70% in Group VL (p = 0.099). Hemodynamic responses, intubation time, number of attempts, duration of view of the glottis opening, and the need for external laryngeal pressure were similar between the groups. Conclusions: Due to its ability to provide effective intubation conditions, we believe that the McGrath-MAC VL, when used with the indirect view method, can also be utilized in anesthesia practices alongside the DV method.

Effect of head and neck positions on tracheal intubation using a McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope: A randomised, prospective study.

Different head and neck positions may affect video laryngoscopy in terms of laryngeal exposure, intubation difficulty, advancement of the tracheal tube into the glottis and the occurrence of palatopharyngeal mucosal injury. We investigated the effects of simple head extension, head elevation without head extension and the sniffing position on tracheal intubation using a McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope. A randomised, prospective study. Medical centre governed by a university tertiary hospital. A total of 174 patients undergoing general anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups: simple head extension (neck extension without a pillow), head elevation only (head elevation with a pillow of 7 cm and no neck extension) and sniffing position (head elevation with a pillow of 7 cm and neck extension). During tracheal intubation using a McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope in three different head and neck positions, we assessed intubation difficulty by several methods: a modified intubation difficulty scale score, time taken for tracheal intubation, glottic opening, number of intubation attempts, requirements for other manoeuvres (lifting force or laryngeal pressure) for laryngeal exposure and advancement of the tracheal tube into the glottis. The occurrence of palatopharyngeal mucosal injury was evaluated after tracheal intubation. Tracheal intubation was significantly easier in the head elevation group than in the simple head extension (P = 0.001) and sniffing positions (P = 0.011). Intubation difficulty did not differ significantly between the simple head extension and sniffing positions (P = 0.252). The time taken for intubation in the head elevation group was significantly shorter than that in the simple head extension group (P < 0.001). A lifting force or laryngeal pressure was required less frequently for tube advancement into the glottis in the head elevation group than in the simple head extension (P = 0.002) and sniffing position groups (P = 0.012). The need for a lifting force or laryngeal pressure for tube advancement into the glottis was not significantly different between the simple head extension and sniffing positions (P = 0.498). Palatopharyngeal mucosal injury occurred less frequently in the head elevation group than in the simple head extension group (P = 0.009). The head elevation position facilitated tracheal intubation using a McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope compared with a simple head extension or sniffing position. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05128968).

GLOTTIC VIEW COMPARISON BETWEEN MCGRATH MAC VIDEO AND MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPES

The purpose of the study was to compare the efcacy of the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation procedures. The study was conducted on 70 patients who were undergoing elective surgery and classied as ASA I or II. The patients were intubated by an anaesthesia trainee under the supervision of a senior anaesthetist. The primary outcome of the study was the improvement in the glottic view, which was assessed using the Cormack-Lehane (C-L) grading system. The results of the study indicated that the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope provided a signicantly better glottic view compared to the Macintosh laryngoscope. 67.1% of the cases were found to have a C-L grade I view when assessed with the McGrath MAC, compared to 42.9% with the Macintosh. Furthermore, 17% of the cases showed an improvement in the glottic view to C-L grade I when assessed with the McGrath MAC. In addition to the improvement in glottic view, the study found that the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope was easier to use and improved the self-condence of the anaesthesia trainee. This is of particular signicance in difcult airway situations where a quick and accurate intubation is of utmost importance. In conclusion, the study suggests that the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope can be used as a safe and effective alternative airway device, providing a superior glottic view and ease of intubation in normal airway patients. The use of this device can also enhance the self-condence of anaesthetists in training, making tracheal intubation more secure and effortless in challenging circumstances.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF McGRATH MAC VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE AND MACINTOSH LARYNGOSCOPE FOR ORO-TRACHEAL INTUBATION IN NORMAL AIRWAY.

Background- Oro-tracheal intubation is practiced for oxygenation &amp; ventilation along with inhalational anesthetic delivery and in emergency conditions for securing airway. The objective of our study was to evaluate and compare the intubations by McGrath VL and Macintosh laryngoscope. A prospective, observational s Methodology- tudy in 80 patients undergoing elective surgical procedures with normal airway. All patients were premedicated and pre-oxygenated with 100% O2 for ve minutes and induced with inducing agent inj. Propofol 2mg/kg and neuromuscular blocking agent inj. Succinyl choline 1.5 mg/kg. Patients were divided into 2 groups for Macintosh Laryngoscope and McGrath VL. We have noted TTI, number of intubation attempts, C-L grade, POGO score, modication of positioning, the requirement of external laryngeal pressure manipulation and complications during and after intubations. Haemodynamic parameters were monitored and recorded. Time to intubate in McG VL Group (38.92 ± Observation &amp; Results- 11.07) was signicantly shortened than Mac L Group (57.95 ± 10.37)(). Percentage of glottic opening was better in McGrath Video Laryngoscope group (McG VL) than Macintosh laryngoscope group (Mac L). Incidence of complications were less in McG VL Group than Mac L group. The study Conclusionconcluded that McGrath MAC Video laryngoscope is better than Macintosh laryngoscope for oro-tracheal intubation in normal airway as it provides earlier time to intubate, signicantly superior glottic view, more rst attempt success rate without any complications and stable vitals.

The Use of McGrath MAC Video Laryngoscope Versus McCoy Laryngoscope in Adults with Anticipated Difficult Airway Undergoing Elective Surgery.

Difficult airway management remains one of the most challenging clinical situations encountered by anaesthetists. The study compared the effectiveness of the McGrath MAC video laryngoscope to the McCoy® laryngoscope in patients with difficult airway. Following the institution's ethical approval, the randomised controlled trial was conducted involving 74 adults with American Society of anaesthesiologists' physical status (ASA) grading of I-III scheduled for elective surgery. The Patients were randomised into either group MVL (McGrath MAC) or group MCC (McCoy) and intubated after preoxygenation with 100% oxygen and administration of IV propofol and suxamethonium. The Intubation Difficulty Score (IDS), success rate of intubation, time to intubation, number of optimising manoeuvres and complications was assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24.0 computer software (IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corp. NY, United States). Numerical and categorical data were compared using the student's t-test and Chi square (χ2) test respectively. A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Lower IDS scores were noted in the McGrath group; 54.1% vs. 5.4% of patients had IDS score of 0 in the McGrath and McCoy groups respectively, (P < 0.001). Overall success rate was higher in the McGrath group (100% vs. 89.1%), P = 0.040. Lower IDS scores and improved intubation success rate was achieved with the McGrath compared with the McCoy laryngoscope in patients with predicted difficult airway. The McGrath has proved to be useful in managing patients with difficult airway.

A prospective cohort evaluation of the McGrath™ MAC videolaryngoscope in a series of 979 cases

BackgroundEvidence favouring the effectiveness of videolaryngoscopes over conventional direct laryngoscopy for facilitating successful tracheal intubation has been growing. However, to choose between different devices, clinicians need to know how individual devices perform outside of carefully controlled clinical trials. AimTo evaluate the effectiveness of the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope as it was introduced into clinical practice. MethodsCohort evaluation of McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope use in clinical practice by voluntary completion of an evaluation form over a two-year period. ResultsIn a total of 979 cases, tracheal intubation was successful in 955/979 (97.5%), with first pass success achieved in 785/955 (82.2%). Most tracheal intubations (964/979, 80.1%) were performed during ‘office hours’ (Monday to Friday 0800-1800). Senior anaesthetists conducted 423/970 (43.6%) of intubations. There were 24/979 (2.5%) failed intubations, with consultants or senior anaesthetists conducting laryngoscopy in the majority of these; in 16/22 failed intubations, a grade I or II glottic view was obtained on the videolaryngoscope screen. Of the 20 anaesthetists involved as intubators, 14 had used the device fewer than 50 times. ConclusionOur historical results demonstrate the effectiveness and feasibility of using the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope to facilitate tracheal intubation in clinical practice. However, we believe the most important finding was the number of “easy” grade I and II glottic views on videolaryngoscopy where tracheal intubation was not achieved. Our experience and the evidence suggest that in order to fully realise the numerous benefits of videolaryngoscopy, the introduction of formal teaching and instruction by trained trainers is essential.

Effects of head-elevated position on tracheal intubation using a McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway: a prospective randomized crossover study

BackgroundThe head-elevated laryngoscopy position has been described to be optimal for intubation, particularly in obese patients and those with anticipated difficult airways. Horizontal alignment of the external auditory meatus and sternal notch (AM-S) can be used as endpoints for optimal positioning. Thus, we aligned the head-elevated position with the AM-S in the horizontal plane and evaluated its effect on laryngeal visualization and ease of intubation using a McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope in patients with a simulated difficult airway.MethodsSixty-four patients were included in this prospective, crossover, randomized controlled trial. A cervical collar was used to restrict neck movement and mouth opening. The head-elevated position was achieved by raising the back section of the operation room table and ensuring that the end point was horizontally aligned with the AM-S (table-ramp method). The laryngeal view was randomly assessed in both head-flat and head-elevated positions based on the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score and modified Cormack–Lehane (MCL) grade. External laryngeal manipulation was not permitted when laryngeal visualization was scored. The trachea was intubated only once (in the second position). The ease of intubation was assessed based on the need for optimization maneuvers, intubation difficulty scale (IDS) scores and time to intubation.ResultsThe mean table-ramp angle required to achieve the horizontal alignment of AM-S was 17.5 ± 4.1°. The mean POGO score improved significantly in the head-elevated position (59.4 ± 23.8%) when compared with the head-flat position (37.5 ± 24%) (P < 0.0001). MCL grade 1 or 2a was achieved in 56 (85.9%) and 28 (43.7%) of patients in the head-elevated and head-flat positions, respectively (P < 0.0001). Optimization maneuvers for intubation were required in 7 (21.9%) and 17 (53.1%) patients in the head-elevated and head-flat positions, respectively (P < 0.0001). The IDS scores and time to intubation did not differ significantly between the two positions.ConclusionIn the head-elevated position, aligning the AM-S in the horizontal plane consistently improved laryngeal visualization without worsening the view when the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope was used in patients with simulated difficult airways. It also improved the ease of intubation, which reduced the need for optimization maneuvers.Trial registrationThis trial was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04716218, on 20/01/2021.

Influence of videolaryngoscopy using McGrath Mac on the need for a helper to perform intubation during general anaesthesia: a multicentre randomised video-no-video trial

ObjectiveWe hypothesised that videolaryngoscopy modifies practice of tracheal intubation.DesignRandomised single-blinded study (video and no-video groups).SettingThree institutions: one academic, one non-profit and one profit.ParticipantsPatients >18 years, requiring orotracheal intubation, without predicted...

Efficacy of stylet angulation at the holding position during tracheal intubation with a videolaryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial

The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to determine the efficacy of stylet angulation at the holding position during tracheal intubation with a McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope. Patients were randomized to a group for intubation without stylet angulation at the holding position (non-angulation group) and to a group for intubation with stylet angulation at the holding position (angulation group). The primary outcome was the time for placement of the tracheal tube. Sixty patients were analyzed. The mean (standard deviation) times for tube placement were 21.3 (5.6) s in the non-angulation group and 16.9 (3.8) s in the angulation group (P < 0.001). The scores of operator's perception of difficulty in tube delivery, number of attempts for tube delivery, and degrees of extension, abduction, internal rotation of the right upper arm and extension of the right wrist during tube placement in the angulation group were significantly smaller than those in the non-angulation group (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, respectively). Our results suggest that stylet angulation at the holding position improves maneuverability of the tracheal tube and enables easy, smooth, and swift tube placement during tracheal intubation with a McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope.

Three-day tracheal intubation manikin training for novice doctors using Macintosh laryngoscope, McGRATH MAC videolaryngoscope and Pentax AirwayScope.

Background:We compared the intubation skills obtained by novice doctors following training using 3 instruments, the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope (Mac) and 2 types of indirect video-laryngoscopes (McGrathTM-MAC: McGrath (McG) and AirwayScope (AWS)), to determine the most appropriate instrument for novice doctors to acquire intubation skills, especially focusing on visual confirmation of vocal cords, during a 3-day intensive manikin training program.Methods:Fifteen novice doctors who did not have sufficient experience in endotracheal intubation (ETI) and consented to participate in this study were included. We used AirSim and AMT (Airway management Trainer) manikins. First, an experienced anesthesiologist instructed the trainees on using the 3 instruments for a few minutes. Then, after familiarizing themselves with each device for 10 minutes, the participants attempted ETI on the 2 manikins with the 3 devices used in random order. Intubations with each device were practiced and performed for 3 successive days. We assessed the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score, successful intubation rate and tracheal intubation time for each participant, with each device, and on each day.Results:In the first manikin, AirSim, POGO scores in the McG and AWS groups were significantly higher than those in the Mac group on all 3 days (P < .0001). The number of intubation failures in the Mac group decreased from 2 cases on day 1, to 1 case on day 2 and zero cases on day 3. There were no failures in the McG and AWS groups on any of the days. With the second manikin, AMT, POGO scores in the Mac group were significantly lower than those in the McG and AWS groups on all 3 days. There were no intubation failures in the AWS group on all 3 days. In the Mac group, the number of intubation failures decreased from 3 on day 1, to 2 on day 2 and zero failures on day 3. In the McG group, there were only 3 failures on day 1.Conclusion:The 2 types of indirect video-laryngoscopes (McGRATH and AirwayScope) were demonstrated to be suitable instruments for novice doctors to achieve higher POGO scores in a 3-day intensive ETI training.

McGRATH MAC video laryngoscope assistance during transesophageal echocardiography may reduce the risk of complications: a manikin study

BackgroundAlthough transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is considered a relatively safe diagnostic monitoring method, blind probe insertion is associated with pharyngeal trauma. Through visual observation of the esophageal inlet with the McGRATH video laryngoscope, it may be possible to insert the TEE probe at an appropriate angle and prevent pharyngeal trauma. We conducted a manikin study to investigate whether the use of the McGRATH video laryngoscope for TEE probe insertion reduced the pressure on the posterior pharyngeal wall.MethodsTwenty-seven junior (inexperienced group) and 10 senior (experienced group) anesthesiologists participated in this study. The TEE probe was inserted into an airway manikin in a blind fashion (blind group) or under visualization with the McGRATH (McGRATH group) video laryngoscope (three times each). A sealed bag filled with normal saline was placed on the back of the posterior pharyngeal wall of the manikin and connected to a patient monitoring system via a pressure transducer. We measured the internal bag pressure and approximated this value to the pressure on the posterior pharyngeal wall.ResultsThe pressure on the posterior pharyngeal wall was significantly lower in the McGRATH group than in the blind group (p < 0.001) and was significantly reduced when the McGRATH was employed in both the inexperienced (p < 0.001) and experienced (p < 0.001) groups.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that TEE probe insertion under the assistance of the McGRATH video laryngoscope can reduce the pressure on the posterior pharyngeal wall, regardless of the clinician’s experience, and may inform clinical practice with the potential to reduce probe insertion-associated complication rates.

Comparison of two different shapes of stylets for intubation with the McGrath MAC® video laryngoscope: a randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveThis study was performed to compare two different shapes of stylets, 60° and J-shaped stylets, for intubation using the McGrath MAC® video laryngoscope (MVL).MethodsTwo hundred twenty-two patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to Group J (n = 111) or Group 60° (n = 111) and intubated using the MVL with the stylet bent into the allocated shape. The time to intubation (TTI) and other intubating profiles were compared between the groups. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the relationship between factors related to difficult intubation and TTI.ResultsThe TTI was not different between the two groups. There were also no differences in the intubating profiles between the two groups. In both groups, the TTI was longer with a modified Mallampati score (mMS) of ≥3 and percentage of glottic opening (POGO) score of <50. In Group J, the TTI was longer with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥30 kg/m2.ConclusionThe TTI during tracheal intubation with the MVL was not different between the two groups. The TTI was longer with an mMS of ≥3 and POGO score of <50. In Group J, the TTI was longer with a BMI of ≥30 kg/m2.

Changing the view: Video versus direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the pediatric emergency department.

The aim of this study was to compare the success of first-attempt tracheal intubation in pediatric patients >1-year old performed using video versus direct laryngoscopy and compare the frequency of tracheal intubation–associated events and desaturation among these patients.Prospective observational cohort study conducted in an Academic pediatric tertiary emergency department. We compared 50 children intubated with Mcgrath Mac video laryngoscope (VL group) and an historical series of 141 children intubated with direct laryngoscopy (DL group). All patients were aged 1 to 18 years.The first attempt success rates were 68% (34/50) and 37.6% (53/141) in the VL and DL groups (P < .01), respectively. There was a lower proportion of tracheal intubation–associated events in the VL group (VL, 31.3% [15/50] vs DL, 67.8% [97/141]; P < .01) and no significant differences in desaturation (VL, 35% [14/50] vs DL 51.8% [72/141]; P = .06). The median number of attempts was 1 (range, 1–5) for the VL group and 2 (range, 1–8) for the DL group (P < .01). Multivariate logistic regression showed that video laryngoscope use was associated with higher chances of first-attempt intubation with an odds ratio of 4.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.9–10.4, P < 0.01).Compared with direct laryngoscopy, VL was associated with higher success rates of first-attempt tracheal intubations and lower rates of tracheal intubation–associated events.

Impact of Videolaryngoscopy Expertise on First-Attempt Intubation Success in Critically Ill Patients.

The use of a videolaryngoscope in the ICU on the first endotracheal intubation attempt and intubation-related complications is controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the first intubation attempt success rate in the ICU with the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) according to the operators' videolaryngoscope expertise and to describe its association with the occurrence of intubation-related complications. Observational study. Medical ICU. Consecutive endotracheal intubations in critically ill patients. Systematic use of the videolaryngoscope. We enrolled 202 consecutive endotracheal intubations. Overall first-attempt success rate was 126 of 202 (62%). Comorbidities, junior operator, cardiac arrest upon admission, and coma were associated with a lower first-attempt success rate. The first-attempt success rate was less than 50% in novice operators (1-5 previous experiences with videolaryngoscope, independently of airway expertise with direct laryngoscopies) and 87% in expert operators (> 15 previous experiences with videolaryngoscope). Multivariate analysis confirmed the association between specific skill training with videolaryngoscope and the first-attempt success rate. Severe hypoxemia and overall immediate intubation-related complications occurred more frequently in first-attempt failure intubations (24/76, 32%) than in first-attempt success intubations (14/126, 11%) (p < 0.001). We report for the first time in the critically ill that specific videolaryngoscopy skill training, assessed by the number of previous videolaryngoscopies performed, is an independent factor of first-attempt intubation success. Furthermore, we observed that specific skill training with the McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope was fast. Therefore, future trials evaluating videolaryngoscopy in ICUs should consider the specific skill training of operators in videolaryngoscopy.

Radiographic Predictors of Difficult McGrath MAC Videolaryngoscopy in Patient Undergoing Cervical Spine Surgery.

McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopy is a useful technique for successful intubation in cervical spine-injured patients with manual in-line stabilization of the neck during intubation. We aimed to identify radiographic predictors of difficult McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopy in patient undergoing cervical spine surgery. Patients undergoing cervical spine surgery who were intubated with a McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope under manual in-line stabilization of the neck between June 2016 and August 2018 were included in this study. Data on airway-related variables and radiographic indices obtained from preoperative lateral cervical spine x-ray, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography (CT) scans were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into difficult and easy McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopic intubation groups on the basis of intubation time and the number of intubation attempts. In total, 183 patients were included in the study of which 33 (18%) showed difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, atlanto-occipital distance (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.89; P=0.001) on lateral cervical spine x-ray, incisor-C1-C6 angle in neck extension on lateral cervical spine x-ray (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.02-1.22; P=0.015), tongue area/oral cavity area ratio in the mid-sagittal plane of cervical magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.19; P<0.001), and interincisor gap (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98; P=0.015) were independent risk factors for difficult videolaryngoscopic intubation. Radiographic variables indicating enlarged tongue relative to the oral cavity and limited neck extension were associated with difficult McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopy in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery with manual in-line cervical stabilization during intubation.

HELP-VDL: study protocol for a multicentre, open, randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of the head-elevated laryngoscopy position and the use of a videolaryngoscope to facilitate orotracheal intubation in a patient population without predictable difficulty of intubation

IntroductionTracheal intubation remains an everyday challenge for anaesthesiologists, even in patients without suspected difficult airways. The ideal positioning of the patient’s head (flat, raised a few centimetres on a cushion...