MBSAQIP Database Research Articles

Predictors of postoperative bleeding after minimally invasive bariatric surgery.

Minimally invasive bariatric surgeries provide effective weight loss with fewer complications. However, postoperative bleeding remains a significant concern due to its potential for serious morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to identify factors predicting postoperative bleeding following laparoscopic and robotic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). We analyzed patients who underwent SG and RYGB using the MBSAQIP database from 2015 to 2021. Four multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to investigate the relationship between postoperative bleeding and 24 independent factors for laparoscopic SG (lapSG), robotic SG (rSG), laparoscopic RYGB (lapRYGB), and robotic RYGB (rRYGB). We analyzed 659,294 lapSG, 53,548 rSG, 267,171 lapRYGB, and 22,492 rRYGB patients. In lapSG, the most significant factors included anticoagulation (OR 3.76; 95% CI 3.13-4.51), renal insufficiency (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.37-3.09), history of DVT (OR 1.87; 95% CI 1.23-2.85), history of PE (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.04-2.76, and BMI ≤ 40 (OR 1.22; 95% CI 1.09-1.38). In the rSG group, anticoagulation (OR 4.95; 95% CI 2.83-8.66), COPD (OR 2.80; 95% CI 1.29-6.05), and hyperlipidemia (OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.29-6.05) were significant factors. In lapRYGB, the most significant factors included anticoagulation (OR 3.68; 95% CI 3.11-4.35), renal insufficiency (OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.04-2.44), history of DVT (OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.09-2.07), cardiac stent (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.09-2.07), and BMI ≤ 40 (OR 1.16; 95% CI 1.03-1.29). For rRYGB, anticoagulation (OR 4.69; 95% CI 2.86-7.70), history of PE (OR 4.28; 95% CI 1.53-12.00), and cardiac stent (OR 2.15; 95% CI 0.06-4.34) were significant. Preoperative anticoagulation, renal insufficiency, history of DVT and PE, a cardiac stent, and BMI ≤ 40 are associated with an increased risk of postoperative bleeding. The predictive factors were consistent across laparoscopic and robotic approaches in SG and RYGB procedures.

Venous Thromboembolic Events Following Revisional Gastric Bypass: An Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database from 2015 to 2019 Using Propensity Matching.

Primary bariatric surgery is associated with moderate-to-high risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTE); however, the risk for revisional surgery lacks granularity. Our primary objective was to define the risk of VTE following revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) compared to primary RYGB. Adults who underwent primary or revision/conversion RYGB between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, with a BMI ≥ 35kg/m2 were identified in a bariatric specific database. VTE was defined as pulmonary embolus and/or deep venous thrombosis. Thirty-day VTE and transfusion rates were compared between the two groups using propensity score matching of 3:1. Primary RYGB was performed in 197,186 (92.4%) patients compared to 16,144 (7.6%) in the revisional group. Patients in the revisional group had fewer comorbidities than those undergoing primary RYGB. In the matched cohort of 64,258 procedures, there were 48,116 (74.9%) primary RYGB cases compared to 16,142 (25.1%) RYGB revisions. The rate of VTE was similar in the revisional surgery group compared to the propensity matched primary RYGB group (0.4% vs. 0.3%, p > 0.580); however, transfusion was more common in the revisional group (1.4% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.005). Revisional group had higher rates of readmission, reoperation, increased length of stay, and operation length ≥ 180min compared to matched primary RYGB group (p < 0.001). VTE rates for both primary and revisional RYGB are similar. Revisional RYGB cases impose increased risk of bleeding among other outcomes. Thus, identifying those at higher risk of complications is critical.

Perioperative outcomes of same-day discharge laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the MBSAQIP database.

There has been a rising trend of outpatient bariatric surgery, particularly accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and outcomes of same-day discharge laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) using the MBSAQIP database. In this retrospective study, the MBSAQIP was queried for patients undergoing non-revisional LRYGB between 2020 and 2021. Two cohorts were established: same-day discharge (SDD; length of stay = 0days) and next-day discharge (POD1; length of stay = 1day), with the latter serving as a control group. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were employed to compare outcomes between cohorts. A total of 48,408 patients underwent LRYGB, with 1,918 (4.0%) SDD and 46,490 (96.0%) POD1. The two cohorts were similar in mean age (SDD 44.2 ± 11.3years vs POD1 44.0 ± 11.3years; p = 0.61) and female sex (SDD 83.8% vs POD1 83.1%; p = 0.43). However, the POD1 cohort had a higher preoperative body mass index (45.4 ± 7.3 vs 44.9 ± 7.3kg/m2; p < 0.01). Preoperative anticoagulation and obstructive sleep apnea were more prevalent in the POD1 group. There was no difference in overall 30-day overall complication rates (SDD 2.0% vs POD1 2.3%; p = 0.51), reintervention, reoperations, mortality, and emergency department visits between the two cohorts. Readmissions were lower in the SDD cohort (2.9% vs 4.0%; p = 0.02), whereas the need for outpatient intravenous hydration was higher in the SDD cohort (6.7% vs 3.6%; p < 0.01). This finding remained significant even after adjustment for confounders. Same-day LRYGB is safe and feasible, with comparable complication rates to next-day discharge. Notably, SDD is associated with lower readmission rate and higher need for outpatient intravenous hydration, possibly reflecting rigorous bariatric protocols and thorough patient follow-up. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the selection criteria and optimize postoperative care for outpatient LRYGB.

Concurrent minimally invasive bariatric surgery and ventral hernia repair with mesh; Is it safe? Propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2022 MBSAQIP database.

Obesity is a risk factor for the development of ventral hernias. Approximately eight percent of patients undergoing bariatric surgery have a concomitant ventral hernia. However, the optimal timing of hernia repair in these patients is debated. Concerns regarding mesh insertion in a potentially contaminated field are often cited by opponents of a combined approach. Our study compares 30-day outcomes of bariatric surgery with concurrent ventral hernia repair with mesh versus bariatric surgery alone. Using the 2015-2022 MBSAQIP database, patients aged 18-65years who underwent minimally invasive sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with or without concurrent ventral hernia repair with mesh (VHR-M) were identified. 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared between patients who underwent SG or RYGB with VHR-M versus SG or RYGB alone. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using 26 preoperative characteristics to adjust confounders. Among 1,236,644 patients who underwent SG (n = 871,326) or RYGB (n = 365,318), 3,121 underwent SG + VHR-M and 2,321 RYGB + VHR-M. The concurrent approach had longer operative times, in SG + VHR-M (86.06 ± 42.78 vs. 73.80 ± 38.45min, p < 0.001), and in RYGB + VHR-M (141.91 ± 58.68 vs. 128.47 ± 62.37min, p < 0.001). The RYGB + VHR-M cohort had higher rates of reoperations (3.2% vs. 2.1%, p = 0.024). Overall, 30-day outcomes, and bariatric-specific complications such as mortality, unplanned ICU admissions, surgical site complications, cardiac, pulmonary, renal complications, anastomotic leaks, postoperative bleeding, and intestinal obstruction were similar between SG + VHR-M or RYGB + VHR-M groups versus SG or RYGB alone. Bariatric surgery performed concurrently with VHR-M is safe and feasible and does not excessively prolong operative times. However, patients undergoing RYGB with VHR-M do have a higher rate of reoperations, therefore a staged VHR is recommended. On the other hand, concurrent SG and VHR-M may benefit after an appropriate individualized risk stratification assessment.

Six-year analysis of 30-day post-operative leaks for primary sleeve gastrectomy: a MBSAQIP database study.

Sleeve gastrectomy is the most performed bariatric surgery. Post-operative gastric sleeve leaks, although rare, are dreaded complications. This study aims to perform an updated investigation of the factors associated with sleeve leaks. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 692,554 cases from the MBSAQIP database (2016-2021) with CPT code 43,775 for primary sleeve gastrectomy. We excluded emergency operations, conversions/revisions, endoscopic interventions, patient with prior foregut surgery, and open operations. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (STATA version 15) was performed to identify factors associated with sleeve gastrectomy leaks. Out of 692,554 patients, 600,910 (86.77%) patients underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, and 91,644 (13.23%) patients underwent robotic sleeve gastrectomy. 1179 (0.17%) developed leaks within 30days; 177(0.19%) were in the robotic group and 1002 (0.17%) in the laparoscopic group with no significant difference in leak rates between two groups on multivariate analysis. Black patients had lower odds of having leaks as compared to white patients (Odds Ratio (OR): 0.68 (0.56-0.82); p < 0.01). Hispanic patients had lower odds of having leak as compared to non-Hispanics. Factors associated with higher leak odds (p < 0.05) included hypertension, GERD, smoking, immunosuppression, increased operating time, and albumin < 3.5g/dl. Higher odds of leaks were observed in years 2016-2019 vs 2020-2021 (OR: 1.44 (1.25-1.65), p < 0.01). Higher odds of leak in operations with general surgeons compared to bariatric surgeons was found (OR: 1.46 (1.04-2.02), p = 0.02); observed only on robotic group on subgroup analysis (OR: 2.2 (1.2-4.2), p = 0.02). Staple line reinforcement, oversewing, and performance of leak test showed no differences in leak rate. Bougie size and distance from pylorus were not associated with changes in leak rate. This study provides updated insights into the factors associated with sleeve leaks, reinforcing information gained from prior studies. A higher association of leak among general surgeons could represent a learning curve for new robotic general surgeons. The overall decreasing trend for gastric sleeve leak is encouraging and may be a sign of improved techniques.

Racial disparities in the utilization and outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: an 8-year analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program data

BackgroundRobotic surgery utilization has been increasing across surgical specialties; however, racial disparities in patient access to care and outcomes have been reported. ObjectivesIn this study, we examined racial disparities in the utilization and outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery over an 8-year period. SettingMetabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) centers of excellence across the United States. MethodsThe MBSAQIP database was used to identify adult patients who underwent robotic bariatric surgery between 2015 and 2022. Patients were stratified according to race and ethnicity into non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black or African American (AA), Indigenous, Asian, and Hispanic patients. Multivariable analyses were used to assess predictors of robotic surgery use, odds of minor and major complications, prolonged length of stay (prolonged length of stay (pLOS): ≥3 days), readmissions, reoperations, and mortality within 30 days. ResultsOut of 1,288,359 patients included, robotic surgery was utilized in 196,314 patients (15.2%), with a mean age of 44 ± 12 years and 80.6% females. Rates of robotic surgery increased to 30% by 2022. Compared to White patients, Black/AA patients were more likely to undergo robotic surgery (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.21-1.24, P < .001). The safety of robotic bariatric surgery improved for both White and Black patients with decreased odds of major complications, readmissions, reoperations, and pLOS over the study period. However, Black/AA patients were more likely to experience minor and major complications, readmissions and have pLOS compared with White patients in 2022 (aOR:1.26, 95% CI:1.19-1.34, P < .001; aOR:1.22, 95% CI:1.06-1.41, P = .006; aOR:1.44, 95% CI:1.28-1.62, P < .001; aOR:2.26, 95% CI:2.06-2.47, P < .001, respectively). ConclusionThe utilization of robotic bariatric surgery has increased significantly over the past 8 years with continued improvements in its safety profile. While Black/AA patients have improved access to robotic surgery, their clinical outcomes continue to be worse than those of White patients. Efforts to address racial disparities in bariatric surgery outcomes must remain a priority to achieve health equity.

Safety and factors associated with early discharge in revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: analysis of the MBSAQIP database.

Improvements in bariatric surgery outcomes have prompted policy initiatives that explore shifting bariatric surgery toward outpatient procedures. While the safety of early discharge after primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been reported, its safety for revisional LRYGB remains uncertain. Our study aimed to investigate the safety and patient factors associated with early discharge in patients undergoing revisional LRYGB compared with primary LRYGB. We identified adult patients who underwent primary and revisional LRYGB from 2020 to 2022 in the MBSAQIP database. Patients discharged early, i.e., same-day discharge (SDD) and next-day discharge (NDD) were compared to inpatients. Outcomes included 30-day complications (minor = Clavien-Dindo 1-2; major = Clavien-Dindo 3-4), mortality, readmissions, and reoperations. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative time were fitted to assess the study outcomes. SDD rate was similar after primary (3,422/137,406; 2.5%) and revisional LRYGB (781/32,721; 2.4%), while NDD rate was higher in primary LRYGB (59.8% vs 54.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). SDD patients had lower odds of major complications compared to inpatients following primary (2% vs 7%, aOR: 0.30, 95%CI 0.24-0.38) and revisional LRYGB (3.7% vs 9.3%, aOR: 0.43, 95%CI 0.29-0.62, respectively). NDD patients had similarly lower odds of morbidity outcomes. ASA Classification IV/V was associated with lower odds of SDD compared to Class I/II (Primary: 0.9% vs. 3%, aOR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.78; Revisions: 0.9% vs. 3%, aOR: 0.24, 95%CI 0.10-0.55). Early discharge after revisional LRYGB, particularly after an overnight stay, can be accomplished safely in carefully selected patients. However, SDD rates remain low limiting its safety assessment. Further, almost half of the patients stay more than 48h in the hospital suggesting that policy initiatives toward outpatient management after bariatric surgery may be inappropriate for this patient population.

Increased staple line leak rates following re-sleeve: analysis comparing re-sleeve versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass conversion and primary sleeve gastrectomy.

Sleeve gastrectomy is the most common bariatric procedure and its long-term complications include inadequate weight loss, weight regain, and de novo GERD, often requiring revisional surgery. Revisions, notably re-sleeve and conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), are frequently performed, but safety data is limited. Herein, we used the MBSAQIP database to compare 30day outcomes of primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with re-sleeve (RS) and SG to RYGB conversion. Patients who underwent primary SG, RS, and SG to RYGB conversion within the MBSAQIP data registry from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022 were included in this study. Using Propensity Score Matching analysis, the cohorts were matched for 23 preoperative characteristics. We then compared 30day postoperative outcomes and bariatric-specific complications between primary SG and RS (analysis 1) and between RS and SG to RYGB conversion (analysis 2). A total of 302,961 were included. The matched cohorts in analysis 1 (n = 1630) and analysis 2 (n = 1633) had similar pre-operative characteristics. Propensity-matched outcomes in analysis 1 showed that patients in the RS group had significantly higher staple line leak (1.3% vs. 0.1%, p < 0.001) when compared to primary SG. Similarly, longer operative times (90.16 ± 51.90min vs. 68.32 ± 37.54min, p < 0.001) and higher rates of readmissions (5.5% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001), reoperations (2.3% vs. 0.6%, p < 0.001), interventions (2.5% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.001) were found in those who underwent RS. In analysis 2, RS showed higher leak rates (1.3% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.015) when compared to conversion from SG to RYGB. The RS group has a higher risk of staple line leaks compared to primary SG and conversion from SG to RYGB. In our study, there was a 2.6-fold increase in staple line leak after re-sleeve compared to RYGB conversion and a 13-fold increase compared to primary SG.

A superior approach? The role of robotic sleeve gastrectomy in patients with super super obesity using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients with BMI ≥ 60 presents technical challenges, that might be overcome by robotic surgery, but its effectiveness has not been rigorously evaluated. We compared the 30-day outcomes of LSG and robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) in patients with BMI < 60 versus ≥ 60 and between LSG and RSG in patients with BMI ≥ 60. Patients aged 18-65 years who underwent sleeve gastrectomy were included using the 2019-2022 MBSAQIP database. We performed a Propensity Score Matching analysis, with 21 preoperative characteristics. We compared 30-day postoperative outcomes for patients with BMI < 60 versus ≥ 60 using either a laparoscopic (Analysis 1) or robotic approach (Analysis 2) and compared LSG versus RSG in patients with BMI ≥ 60 (Analysis 3). 297,250 patients underwent LSG and 81,008 RSG. Propensity-matched¸ outcomes in analysis 1 (13,503 matched cases), showed that patients with BMI ≥ 60 had higher rates of mortality (0.1% vs. 0.0%, p=0.014), staple line leak (0.3% vs. 0.2%, p=0.035), postoperative bleeding (0.2% vs 0.1%, p=0.028), readmissions (3.5% vs. 2.4%, p<0.001), and interventions (0.7% vs. 0.5%, p=0.028) when compared to patients with BMI < 60. In analysis 2 (4350 matched cases), patients with BMI ≥ 60 demonstrated longer operative times, length of stay, and higher rates of unplanned ICU when compared to patients with BMI < 60. In analysis 3 (4370 matched cases), patients who underwent RSG had fewer readmissions (2.9% vs. 3.7%, p=0.037), staple line leaks (0.1% vs. 0.3%, p=0.029), and postoperative bleeding (0.1% vs. 0.3%, p=0.045), compared to LSG. Conversely, a longer operative time (92.74 ± 38.65 vs. 71.69 ± 37.45 min, p<0.001) was reported. LSG patients with BMI ≥ 60 have higher rates of complications compared to patients with a BMI < 60. Moreover, some outcomes may be improved with the robotic approach in patients with BMI ≥ 60. These results underscore the importance of considering a robotic approach in this super super obese population.

Prevalence, Indications, and Complications of Conversional Surgery After Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: A MBSAQIP Analysis

PurposeVertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) was once the most popular bariatric procedure in the 1980’s, with many patients subsequently requiring conversional surgery. However, knowledge regarding the prevalence and outcomes of these procedures remains limited. This study aims to determine the prevalence, indications, rate of 30-day serious complications, and mortality of conversional surgery after VBG.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of the MBSAQIP database from 2020 to 2022 was conducted. Individuals undergoing conversional or revisional surgery after VBG were included. The primary outcomes were 30-day serious complications and mortality.ResultsOf 716 VBG conversions, the common procedures included 660 (92.1%) Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and 56 (7.9%) sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The main indication for conversion was weight gain for RYGB (31.0%) and for SG (41.0%). RYGB had longer operative times than SG (223.7 vs 130.5 min, p < 0.001). Although not statistically significant, serious complications were higher after RYGB (14.7% vs 8.9%, p = 0.2). Leak rates were higher after SG (5.4 vs 3.5%) but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.4). Mortality was similar between RYGB and SG (1.2 vs 1.8%, p = 0.7). Multivariable regression showed higher body mass index, longer operative time, previous cardiac surgery and black race were independently associated with serious complications. Conversion to RYGB was not predictive of serious complications compared to SG (OR 0.96, 95%CI 0.34–2.67, p = 0.9).ConclusionsConversional surgery after VBG is uncommon, and the rate of complications and mortality remains high. Patients should be thoroughly evaluated and informed about these risks before undergoing conversion from VBG.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on patient selection and access to care, approach type, and postoperative outcomes in bariatric surgery

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic had affected the health systems across the world since early 2020 with a concern about access to medical care during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic. ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to examine how the COVID-19 pandemic influenced patient selection, approach type, and postoperative outcomes in elective bariatric surgery. SettingUnited States. MethodsData from the MBSAQIP database for the years 2016–2020 were queried. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were employed for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Postoperative outcomes within 30 days were assessed separately and based on the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification of III-V. χ2 test and logistic regression were used to compare outcomes between procedure and approach types, as well as surgical operation periods. ResultsA total of 741,620 patients underwent robotic and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric-bypass. The cases performed in 2020 exhibited lower comorbidities and postoperative complications compared to prepandemic years, regardless of the approach type. Notably, the proportion of White patients decreased during the pandemic, while there was an increase in the number of African American and Hispanic patients who had bariatric surgery. ConclusionsPatients who underwent bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic appeared to be healthier with fewer comorbidities and experienced fewer adverse postoperative outcomes compared to those who had surgery prior to the pandemic. This study highlights the limited access to bariatric surgery for high-risk patients during the pandemic.

Early Marginal Ulcer After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: MBSAQIP Database Analysis of Trends and Predictive Factors.

Marginal ulcer (MU) is a known complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) that carries significant morbidity. First, we aimed to determine the trends and the rates of readmission, reintervention, and reoperation of 30-day MU. Second, we aim to determine the predictive factors associated with this complication. Patients who had 30-day marginal ulcer (MU) after LRYGB were identified using the 2015-2021 MBSAQIP database. Those who had a 30-day complication other than MU were excluded. Bivariate and logistic regression analyses were performed. Among 213,104 patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGB, 638 (0.3%) showed 30-day MU. This group of patients required endoscopic interventions, readmissions, and reoperations at rates of 88%, 72%, and 9%, respectively. Predictive factors for 30-day MU after RYGB were renal insufficiency, history of DVT, previous cardiac stent, African American race, chronic steroid use, COPD, therapeutic anticoagulation, anastomotic leak test, GERD, and operative time > 120min. Additionally, patients who had 30-day MU showed significantly higher rates of overall complications such as pulmonary, cardiac and renal complications, unplanned ICU admission, blood transfusions, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and non-home discharge (p < 0.05). The MU group showed similar rates of 30-day mortality as those without this complication (0.2% vs 0.1%, p = 0.587). The incidence of 30-day MU following RYGB was 0.3%. Patients with MU required endoscopic interventions, readmissions, and reoperations at rates of 88%, 72%, and 9%, respectively. Some preoperative and intraoperative factors contributed to an increased risk of 30-day MU.

Safety of Same-Day Discharge after Bariatric Surgery: Retrospective 6-Year North American Analysis.

With increasing implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols and rising demand for inpatient hospital beds accentuated by COVID-19, there has been interest in same-day discharge (SDD) for bariatric surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the national trends, safety profile, and risk factors for complications of SDD for minimally invasive bariatric surgery. We analyzed the MBSAQIP database from 2016 to 2021 to characterize trends in SDD for minimally invasive bariatric operation. Multivariate logistic regression was performed on preoperative patient characteristics predictive of increased complications associated with SDD. A comparative analysis of postoperative outcomes within 30 days was performed for SDD and admission after 1:1 nearest neighbor propensity score matching for patient demographics and preoperative comorbidities. SDD increased from 2.4% in 2016 to 7.4% in 2021. Major preoperative factors associated with increased complications for SDD included Black race, history of MI, renal insufficiency, deep vein thrombosis, and smoking. SDD for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass had 72% increased risk of postoperative complications compared with sleeve gastrectomy. The overall major complications were lower in SDD cohort vs admission cohort (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, p < 0.01). However, there was a significant increase in deaths within 30 days (OR 2.11, p = 0.01), cardiac arrest (OR 2.73; p < 0.01), and dehydration requiring treatment (OR 1.33; p < 0.01) in SDD cohort compared with admission cohort. Nationally, there has been a rise in SDD for bariatric operation from 2016 to 2021. Matched analysis demonstrates that SDD is associated with a significantly higher mortality rate. Additionally, the risk of complications with SDD is higher for RYGB compared with sleeve gastrectomy. Therefore, further studies are required to appropriately select patients for whom bariatric surgery can be safely performed as an outpatient.

Safety of limb lengthening after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database

BackgroundRoux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) effectively treats severe obesity, but some patients may require revisional surgery like limb lengthening (LL) for postoperative weight gain. ObjectivesThis study aims to compare 30-day serious complications and mortality rates between LL and primary RYGB, given limited safety data on LL. MethodsPatients who underwent LL and RYGB were identified from the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, the only years in which LL data were available. Baseline characteristics and 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality were analyzed. ResultsA total of 86,990 patients underwent RYGB and 455 underwent LL. Patients undergoing RYGB were younger (44.4 versus 49.8 yr, P < .001), had a higher body mass index (BMI) (45.5 versus 41.8 kg/m2, P < .001) and higher rates of comorbidities including diabetes (30.0 versus 13.6%, P < .001). RYGB and LL had similar operative duration (125.3 versus 123.2 min, P = .5). There were no statistical differences between cohorts for length of stay (LOS) (1.6 RYGB versus 1.6 LL d, P = .6). After LL, there were higher 30-day rates of reoperation (3.3 versus 1.9%, P = .03) and deep surgical site infections (1.3 versus .5%, P = .03) compared to RYGB. There were no differences in overall serious complications (5.1 LL versus 5.0% RYGB, P = 1.0) and mortality (.2 LL versus .1% RYGB, P = .5). Multivariable logistic regression adjustment found that previous venous thromboembolism was associated with serious complications after LL. ConclusionsWhen compared to primary RYGB, LL has a favorable safety profile with similar 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality.

One anastomosis gastric bypass as a primary bariatric surgery: MBSAQIP database analysis of short-term safety and outcomes.

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is described as a simpler, potentially safe, and effective bariatric-metabolic procedure that has been recently endorsed by the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. First, we aim to compare the 30-day outcomes between OAGB and other bypass procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Second, identify the odds between postoperative complications and each surgical procedure. Patients who underwent primary OAGB, RYGB, and SADI-S were identified using the MBSAQIP database of 2020 and 2021. An analysis of patient demographics and 30-day outcomes were compared between these three bypass procedures. In addition, a multilogistic regression for overall complications, blood transfusions, unplanned ICU admissions, readmission, reoperation, and anastomotic leak stratified by surgical procedure was performed. 1607 primary OAGBs were reported between 2020 and 2021. In terms of patient demographics, patients who underwent RYGB and SADI-S showed a higher incidence of comorbidities. On the other hand, OAGB had shorter length of stay (1.39 ± 1.10days vs 1.62 ± 1.42days and 1.90 ± 2.04days) and operative times (98.79 ± 52.76min vs 125.91 ± 57.76min and 139.85 ± 59.20min) than RYGB and SADI-S. Similarly, OAGB showed lower rates of overall complications (1.9% vs 4.5% and 6.4%), blood transfusions (0.4% vs 1.1% and 1.8%), unplanned ICU admission (0.3% vs 0.8% and 1.4%), readmission (2.4% vs 4.9% and 5.0%), and reoperation (1.2% vs 1.9% and 3.1%). A multilogistic regression analysis was performed, RYGB and SADI-S demonstrated higher odds of 30-day complications. The incidence of primary OAGB has increased since its approval by ASMBS, from 0.05% reported between 2015 and 2019 to 0.78% between 2020 and 2021. OAGB had better 30-day outcomes and shorter operative times than RYGB and SADI-S and therefore, could be considered a viable alternative.

MBSAQIP risk calculator use in bariatric surgery is associated with areduction in serious complications: a retrospective analysis of 210,710 patients.

The Metabolic and Bariatric Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Bariatric Surgical Risk/Benefit Calculator was developed to provide patient-specific information to assist surgical decision-making. To date, no study has characterized which patients are being evaluated with this tool. We sought to characterize the use and impact of the MBSAQIP calculator. MBSAQIP collects data from 955 centers in North America. The 2021 MBSAQIP database was evaluated for the use of the calculator on preoperative counseling for patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Patient characteristics, operative techniques, and outcomes were compared with bivariate analysis. Multivariable modeling evaluated factors including use of the calculator independently associated with serious complications and mortality. Our study included 210,710 patients, 35,158 (16.7%) of whom were evaluated using the calculator. Patients with whom the calculator was used preoperatively were older (43.8 ± 11.6 yr versus 43.6 ± 11.7 yr; P < .001) and were more likely to have insulin-dependent diabetes, hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease, renal insufficiency, and sleep apnea. More patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the calculator cohort compared with the cohort that did not use the calculator (29.6% versus 28.6%; P < .003). The rate of serious complication was significantly less in the calculator cohort (3.1% versus 3.4%; P < .030). Multivariable modeling evaluating serious complications showed that use of the calculator was independently associated with reduced risk of serious complications (odds ratio .87, CI .82-.93, P < .001) but was not associated with mortality. The use of the risk calculator may help to reduce the incidence of complications by opening a dialogue between healthcare professionals and patients, setting realistic expectations, and identifying modifiable risk factors.

Machine learning prediction of major adverse cardiac events after elective bariatric surgery.

Machine learning (ML) is an emerging technology with the potential to predict and improve clinical outcomes including adverse events, based on complex pattern recognition. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) after bariatric surgery have an incidence of 0.1% but carry significant morbidity and mortality. Prior studies have investigated these events using traditional statistical methods, however, studies reporting ML for MACE prediction in bariatric surgery remain limited. As such, the objective of this study was to evaluate and compare MACE prediction models in bariatric surgery using traditional statistical methods and ML. Cross-sectional study of the MBSAQIP database, from 2015 to 2019. A binary-outcome MACE prediction model was generated using three different modeling methods: (1) main-effects-only logistic regression, (2) neural network with a single hidden layer, and (3) XGBoost model with a max depth of 3. The same set of predictor variables and random split of the total data (50/50) were used to train and validate each model. Overall performance was compared based on the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). A total of 755,506 patients were included, of which 0.1% experienced MACE. Of the total sample, 79.6% were female, 47.8% had hypertension, 26.2% had diabetes, 23.7% had hyperlipidemia, 8.4% used tobacco within 1year, 1.9% had previous percutaneous cardiac intervention, 1.2% had a history of myocardial infarction, 1.1% had previous cardiac surgery, and 0.6% had renal insufficiency. The AUC for the three different MACE prediction models was: 0.790 for logistic regression, 0.798 for neural network and 0.787 for XGBoost. While the AUC implies similar discriminant function, the risk prediction histogram for the neural network shifted in a smoother fashion. The ML models developed achieved good discriminant function in predicting MACE. ML can help clinicians with patient selection and identify individuals who may be at elevated risk for MACE after bariatric surgery.

Revisional Procedures after Sleeve Gastrectomy for Weight Recurrence or Inadequate Weight Loss: An Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database.

The safety of conversional bariatric procedures after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for weight recurrence (WR) or inadequate weight loss (IWL) is debated due to limited evidence. Conversion options include Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). We aimed to compare serious complications and mortality rates between these procedures within 30 days. Using the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, we identified patients who underwent a conversion from SG to RYGB, SADI, or BPD-DS. We performed a multivariable logistic regression to assess predictors of 30-day complications and mortality. Among 7388 patients (77.6% RYGB, 8.7% SADI, 13.7% BPD-DS), those undergoing SADI and BPD-DS had higher preoperative body mass index. Conversion reasons included WR (63.0%) and IWL (37.0%). SADI and BPD-DS patients had longer operative times (p < 0.001) and higher leak rates (p = 0.001). Serious complications, reoperations, readmissions, and 30-day mortality were similar across groups. Conversion procedure type was not an independent predictor of complications. RYGB was the most performed conversional procedure after SG. The study indicated a similar safety profile for revisional RYGB, SADI, and BPD-DS, with comparable 30-day complications and mortality rates. However, SADI and BPD-DS patients had longer operative time and higher leak rates.

Do advances in technology translate to improved outcomes? Comparing robotic bariatric surgery outcomes over two-time intervals utilizing the MBSAQIP database.

This study aims to compare outcomes and utilization of robotics in bariatric procedures across two-time intervals, chosen because they correspond to drastic changes in technology utilization-namely, a new platform and a new stapling device. Outcomes of robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (rRYGB) and robotic sleeve gastrectomy (rSG) across this changing landscape have not been well studied, despite increasing popularity. The MBSAQIP database was analyzed over early (2015-2016) and late (2019-2020) time intervals. Patients who underwent rSG and rRYGB were identified, and the cohorts were matched for 26 preoperative characteristics using Propensity Score Matching Analysis. We then compared 30-day outcomes and bariatric-specific complications between the early and late time frames for rSG and rRYGB. 49,442 rSG were identified: 13,526 cases in the early time frame and 35,916 in the late time frame. The matched cohorts were 13,526 for the two groups. 30-day outcomes showed that in the late time frame, rSG was associated with lower rates of pulmonary complications (0.1% vs 0.3%, p < 0.001), readmissions (2.5% vs 3.6%, p < 0.001), interventions (0.6% vs 1.4%, p < 0.001), reoperations (0.7% vs 1.0%, p = 0.024), length of stay (1.36 ± 1.01days vs 1.76 ± 1.79days, p < 0.001), operative time (92.47 ± 41.70min vs102.76 ± 45.67min p < 0.001), staple line leaks (0.2% vs 0.4%, p = 0.001) and strictures (0.0% vs 0.2%, p < 0.001). Similarly, 21,933 rRYGB were found: 6,514 cases were identified in the early time frame and 15,419 in the late time frame. The matched cohorts were 6,513 for the two groups. 30-day outcomes revealed that the late time fame rRYGB was associated with lower rates of pulmonary complications (0.1% vs 0.3%, p = 0.012), readmissions (6.3% vs 7.2%, p = 0.050), interventions (2.0% vs 3.1%, p < 0.001), length of stay (1.69 ± 1.46days vs 2.13 ± 2.12days p < 0.001), postoperative bleeding (0.4% vs 0.7%, p = 0.001), stricture (0.4% vs 0.8%, p < 0.001) and anastomotic ulcer (0.2% vs 0.4%, p = 0.013). Compared to early robotic bariatric surgery outcomes, a significant reduction in pulmonary complications, readmissions, reoperations, interventions and length of stay were seen in 2019-20 after rSG and rRYGB. Potential contributing factors include increased surgical experience and advances in the robotic platform. A significant recent reduction in staple line leaks with faster operative times associated with rSG suggests that stapling technology has had a positive impact on patient outcomes.

Factors Related to Bleeding and Leak Rates After Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Robotic sleeve gastrectomy has been increasing in annual incidence in recent years. Although rare, post op bleeding and leak in these cases can lead to significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare utilization. To determine preop comorbidity risk factors and operative techniques associated with risk of bleeding or leak within 30 days of robotic sleeve gastrectomy. The MBSAQIP database was analyzed. A total of 53,548 RSG cases were included in analysis. Surgeries took place from accredited centers in the USA from 2015 to 2019. Preoperative anticoagulation, renal failure, COPD, and OSA were found to increase in the risk for transfusion requirements after SG. Receiving a transfusion and smoking increased the risk for leak. Staple line reinforcement significantly decreased transfusion and leak rates. Staple line oversewing did not have an impact on bleeding or leak.