BackgroundWe compared silicone photomultipliers with digital photon counting (SiPM) and photomultiplier tubes (PMT) PET in imaging coronary plaque activity with 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF) and evaluated comprehensively SiPM PET reconstruction settings. MethodsIn 25 cardiovascular disease patients (mean age 67±12 years), we conducted 18F-NaF PET on a SiPM (Biograph Vision) and conventional PET (Discovery 710) on the same day as part of a prospective clinical trial (NCT03689946). Following administration of 250 MBq of 18F-NaF, patients underwent a contrast-enhanced CT angiography and a 30-min PET acquisition in list mode on each PET consecutively. Image noise was defined as mean standard deviation of blood pool activity within the left atria. Target-to-background ratio (TBR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were measured within the whole-vessel tubular 3-dimensional volumes of interest on the cardiac motion and attenuation corrected 18F-NaF PET images using dedicated software. ResultsThere were significant differences in image noise and background activity between the two PETs (Image noise (%), PMT: 7.6±3.7 vs. SiPM: 4.0±2.3, p<0.001; background activity, PMT: 1.4±0.4 vs. SiPM: 1.0±0.3, p<0.001). Similarly, the SNR and TBR were significantly higher in vessels scanned with the SiPM PET (SNR, PMT: 16.3±11.5 vs. SiPM: 32.7±29.8, p<0.001; TBR, PMT: 0.8±0.4 vs. SiPM: 1.1±0.6, p<0.001). SiPM PET image reconstruction with a 256 matrix, 1.4 mm pixel, and 2 mm Gaussian filter provided best tradeoff in terms of maximal SNR, TBR and clinically practical file size. ConclusionsIn 18F-NaF coronary PET imaging, the SiPM PET showed superior image contrast and less image noise compared to PMT PET.