Maximum Planning Target Volume Dose Research Articles

Dosimetric evaluation of ultrafractionated dose escalation with simultaneous integrated boost to intraprostatic lesion using 1.5-Tesla MR-Linac in localized prostate cancer.

We analyzed a dose escalation of 36.25 Gy to the entire prostate and a dose increment up to 40 Gy with 1.25 Gy increments to intraprostatic lesion (IPL) using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in five fractions. Eighteen low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with 1.5T MR-Linac were retrospectively evaluated. The same planning computed tomography (CT) images generated four plans: no SIB, 37.5 Gy SIB, 38.75 Gy SIB, and 40 Gy SIB. In four plans, planning target volume (PTV) doses, organ at risk (OAR) doses, and PTV-SIB homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI) and conformity index (CI) were compared. All plans met the criteria for PTV and PTV-SIB coverage. PTV 40 Gy plan has higher maximum PTV and PTV-SIB doses than other plans. The PTV HI was significantly higher in the SIB 40 Gy plan (0.135 ± 0.007) compared to SIB 38.75 Gy plan (0.099 ± 0.007; p = 0.001), SIB 37.5 Gy (0.067 ± 0.008; p < 0.001), and no SIB plan (0.049 ± 0.010; p < 0.001), while there were no significant differences in HI, GI and CI for PTV-SIB between three plans. Four rectum and bladder plans had similar dosimetric parameters. The urethra D5 was significantly higher in SIB 40 Gy plan compared to no SIB plan (37.7 ± 1.1 Gy vs. 37.0 ± 0.7 Gy; p = 0.009) and SIB 37.5 Gy plan (36.9 ± 0.8 Gy; p = 0.008). There was no significant difference in monitor units between the four consecutive plans. Ultra-hypofractionated dose escalation to IPL up to 40 Gy in 5 fractions with a 1.5-T MR-linac is dosimetrically feasible, potentially paving the way for clinical trials.

Intratumoral Dose Escalation Using Lattice Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Unfavorable Size and Location

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a standard of care for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, its safe delivery is limited by tumor size and adjacent organs-at-risk (OARs). RTOG 1112 showed a survival benefit with local control in advanced HCC, but median dose was limited to 35 Gy in 5 fractions due to OARs. Here, we demonstrate the dosimetric feasibility of lattice radiation therapy (LRT) for dose escalation in advanced HCC. Five-fraction volumetric arc-based (VMAT) LRT plans were generated using a customized Python v3.6 script. For each combination of peak/valley doses and sphere size and spacing, a bounding box was generated around the gross tumor volume (GTV) and divided into equal segments in the x, y, and z planes. Individual spheres were constructed for a given parameter set and those fully encompassed within the target contracted by 2 cm were used to create peak dose targets with values of 30, 40, or 50 Gy. Valley dose target volumes over a range of 2 to 45 Gy were generated by subtracting an 8 mm expansion of the peak dose spheres from the overall target volume. Multi-criteria optimization (MCO) was applied to generate a final plan. The planning target volume (PTV) was a 5-mm uniform expansion from the GTV. All plans were generated at maximum inspiration on 4D-CT. OAR parameters were compared against a standard 5-fraction SBRT plan using Wilcoxon signed-rank testing. GTV and PTV measured 593 (23%) and 804 (32%) cm3, respectively, of a total liver volume of 2525 cm3. The minimum distance of GTV from stomach and duodenum was 6 mm and 2 mm, respectively. Plans were evaluated as per RTOG 1112 with stepwise reduction from a maximum PTV dose of 50 Gy based upon ability to meet mean liver dose (MLD, defined as liver-GTV) constraints; the 30 Gy threshold was the highest achievable. Of 7 eligible LRT plans, 5 with ablative 50 Gy peak doses were analyzed. Associated valley doses were 15 or 20 Gy. Median values of mean GTV and PTV doses for these plans were 36.2 (IQR, 34.6 - 37.8) and 32.9 (IQR, 31.3 - 33.4) Gy, respectively. A median of 12.4% (IQR, 7.4 - 28.4) of the GTV received a dose of 50 Gy. Median doses to 0.5 cc of stomach and duodenum were 16.7 Gy (range, 15.6 - 19.6) and 14.4 Gy (range, 12.3 - 23.9), respectively. The median value for MLD was 13.9 Gy (range, 13.6 to 14.8) and the median volume of normal liver spared 15 Gy was 1114 cm3 (range, 969 to 1154). These hepatic parameters were significantly decreased compared to a standard 30 Gy SBRT plan (18.1 Gy and 611.3 cc spared, p = 0.043 for both) which did not meet constraints. Dose escalation of advanced HCC using LRT is dosimetrically feasible. Though mean target doses remained limited by MLD, LRT allowed delivery of ablative dose to 12.4% of the GTV while meeting critical OAR constraints. Intratumoral dose-escalation may improve local control in advanced HCC patients.

Dosimetric comparison and evaluation of two computational algorithms in VMAT treatment plans.

This study aimed to assess the accuracy and dosimetric impact of the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm compared to the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) in two situations. First, simple phantom geometries were set and analyzed; moreover, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) clinical plans for Head & Neck and lung cases were calculated and compared. First, a phantom study was performed to compare the algorithms with radiochromic EBT3 film doses using one PMMA slab phantom and two others containing foam or air gap. Subsequently, a clinical study was conducted, including 20 Head & Neck and 15 lung cases irradiated with the VMAT technique. The treatment plans calculated by AXB and AAA were evaluated in terms of planning target volume (PTV) coverage (V95% ), dose received by relevant organs at risk (OARs), and the impact of using AXB with a grid size of 1mm. Finally, patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) was performed and compared for 17 treatment plans. Phantom dose calculations showed a better agreement of AXB with the film measurements. In the clinical study, AXB plans exhibited lower Conformity Index and PTV V95% , higher maximum PTV dose, and lower mean and minimum PTV doses for all anatomical sites. The most notable differences were detected in regions of intense heterogeneity. AXB predicted lower doses for the OARs, while the calculation time with a grid size of 1mm was remarkably higher. Regarding PSQA, although AAA was found to exhibit slightly higher gamma passing rates, the difference did not affect the AXB treatment plan quality. AXB demonstrated higher accuracy than AAA in dose calculations of both phantom and clinical conditions, specifically in interface regions, making it suitable for sites with large heterogeneities. Hence, such dosimetric differences between the two algorithms should always be considered in clinical practice.

Dosimetric Study Comparing 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT), Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) in Hypofractionated One-Week Radiotherapy Regimen in Breast Cancer.

Introduction Recently, the one-week hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen (26 Gy in 5 fractions) for adjuvant breast radiotherapy has been shown to be non-inferior to other hypofractionated regimens (15-16 fractions). The aim of the present dosimetric study is to compare Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) for a one-week hypofractionated radiotherapy regimen (26 Gy in 5 fractions) for adjuvant breast radiotherapy. Methods A total of 30 patients with histologically proven invasive carcinoma of the breast after breast conservation surgery (BCS) or modified radical mastectomy (MRM) were considered for in silico planning study. The dose prescription used was 26 Gy in 5 fractionsas used in the FAST Forward protocol. Targets were contoured according to standard guidelines. The heart, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral breast were contoured as organs at risk. Results Planning Target Volume (PTV) coverage:For IMRT, VMAT and 3D-CRT, respectively, the volumes that received at least 95% of the prescription dose (V95) were 95.7 ± 2.12, 92.47 ± 3.83, 90.87 ± 5.13; mean PTV doses (Dmean) were 26.1 ± 0.6, 25.7 ± 0.7, and 28 ± 4.39 (3D-CRT has higher Dmean compared to other techniques). Maximum PTV doses (Dmax) were 28.23 ± 0.72, 28.73 ± 0.64, and 29.8 ± 1.03. IMRT had a better V95 coverage and conformity index. Organs At Risk (OARs):The volumes that received at least 25% of the prescription dose (V25) of the heart were 3.41 ± 4.7, 1.8 ± 2.02 and 4.3 ± 6.98 in IMRT, VMAT and 3D-CRT, respectively. The volumetric (V25) comparison of heart dose in left-sided breast cancer was significantly different between VMAT and 3D-CRT (p=0.04, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The volume that received at least 5% of the prescription dose (V5)was less than 25% in the 3D-CRT plan (12.55).For the ipsilateral lung, the V25 parameters were 19.53 ± 10.96, 23.93 ± 13.58 and 20.5 ± 12.32 in IMRT, VMAT and 3D-CRT, respectively. Conclusion From this study, we can conclude that IMRT and VMAT techniques are feasible and can achieve better dosimetric goals for target and OARs though minimizing the area achieving low dose remains to be a dosimetric concern for VMAT.

Dosimetric Evaluation of Physical Radiation Delivery Limits of a Weak Magnetic Field Generator on GBM Dose Distributions

<h3>Purpose/Objective(s)</h3> To demonstrate the feasibility of meeting dose prescription criteria when using a weak magnetic field generator to support glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) radiation therapy. <h3>Materials/Methods</h3> Weak magnetic fields extend free radical life, and recent experimental results have shown that adding weak magnetic fields (20G-40G) to radiation therapy delivery enhances free radical production, increases tumor cell death, and slows tumor growth. Based on these results, we have built the first clinical unit, consisting of two 63 cm ID Helmholtz coils, spaced 35 cm apart. The coil system is placed such that the patient and Linac couch are within the coils, and the Linac isocenter is coincident with the center of the coil system. We propose to use GBM for our first clinical trial. The limitation imposed by the coil system is a fixed Linac couch angle, constraining the gantry rotation to slightly more than 180°, from lateral to lateral. The impact on treatment plan quality of the corresponding reduction in available beam angles was unknown, so we conducted a treatment planning study to determine if we could provide clinically equivalent treatment plans with the coil in place. We evaluated the treatment plans for 10 GBM patients that had been treated with arc therapy. The prescription was 60 Gy (2 Gy x 30 fractions) for 6 patients, 55.8 Gy (1.8 Gy x 31 fractions) for 2 patients, 54 Gy (1.8 Gy x 30 fractions) for 1 patient, and 40.05 Gy (2.67 Gy x 15 fractions) for 1 patient. The dose was delivered to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). The PTV margin was 1.3-2 cm surrounding the gross tumor volume. Critical structures, such as the brainstem, optic nerves, and optic chiasm, were contoured and assigned constraints of 62 Gy, 54 Gy, and 54 Gy, respectively. We repeated the treatment planning session using only coplanar arcs that spanned from 90° to 270° (half-arcs). <h3>Results</h3> All the treatment plans generated with the half-arcs met the clinical criteria. The minimum PTV doses for the half arc and clinical plans were 50.0 ± 6.1 Gy and 51.4 ± 7.1 Gy, and the maximum PTV doses were 61.9 ± 7.1 Gy and 62.7 ± 8.6 Gy, respectively. Table 1 summarizes the results of four reported critical structures. All the critical structures met the criteria, and the half-arc plans were neither better nor worse than the clinical plans. <h3>Conclusion</h3> The physical limits imposed by the magnetic field generator on the Linac beam angles do not degrade treatment planning for GBM radiation therapy. The prescribed dose can be adequately delivered while avoiding critical structures. With this groundwork, we can develop clinical trials to evaluate the impact of utilizing weak magnetic fields in radiation therapy.

Interfractional target changes in brain metastases during 13-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy

BackgroundThe risk for radiation necrosis is lower in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) than in conventional radiotherapy, and 13-fraction SRT is our method of choice for the treatment of brain metastases ≥ around 2 cm or patients who are expected to have a good prognosis. As 13-fraction SRT lasts for at least 17 days, adaptive radiotherapy based on contrast-enhanced mid-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is often necessary for patients undergoing 13-fraction SRT. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed interfractional target changes in patients with brain metastases treated with 13-fraction SRT.MethodsOur analyses included data from 23 patients and 27 metastatic brain lesions treated with 13-fraction SRT with dynamic conformal arc therapy. The peripheral dose prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV) was 39–44.2 Gy in 13-fractions. The gross tumor volume (GTV) of the initial SRT plan (initial GTV), initial PTV, and modified GTV based on the mid-treatment MRI scan (mid-treatment GTV) were assessed.ResultsThe median initial GTV was 3.8 cm3 and the median time from SRT initiation to the mid-treatment MRI scan was 6 days. Compared to the initial GTV, the mid-treatment GTV increased by more than 20% in five lesions and decreased by more than 20% in five lesions. Interfractional GTV volume changes of more than 20% were not significantly associated with primary disease or the presence of cystic components/necrosis. The mid-treatment GTV did not overlap perfectly with the initial PTV in more than half of the lesions.ConclusionsCompared to the initial GTV, the mid-treatment GTV changed by more than 20% in almost one-third of lesions treated with 13-fraction SRT. As SRT usually generates a steep dose gradient as well as increasing the maximum dose of PTV compared to conventional radiotherapy, assessment of the volume and locational target changes and adaptive radiotherapy should be considered as the number of fractions increases.

A Dose-Response Model of Local Tumor Control Probability After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases Resection Cavities

PurposeRecent randomized controlled trials evaluating stereotactic surgery (SRS) for resected brain metastases question the high rates of local control previously reported in retrospective studies. Tumor control probability (TCP) models were developed to quantify the relationship between radiation dose and local control after SRS for resected brain metastases. Methods and MaterialsPatients with resected brain metastases treated with SRS were evaluated retrospectively. Melanoma, sarcoma, and renal cell carcinoma were considered radio-resistant histologies. The planning target volume (PTV) was the region of enhancement on T1 post-gadolinium magnetic resonance imaging plus a 2-mm uniform margin. The primary outcome was local recurrence, defined as tumor progression within the resection cavity. Cox regression evaluated predictors of local recurrence. Dose-volume histograms for the PTV were obtained from treatment plans and converted to 3-fraction equivalent doses (α/β = 12 Gy). TCP models evaluated local control at 1-year follow-up as a logistic function of dose-volume histogram data. ResultsAmong 150 cavities, 41 (27.3%) were radio-resistant. The median PTV volume was 14.6 mL (range, 1.3-65.3). The median prescription was 21 Gy (range, 15-25) in 3 fractions (range, 1-5). Local control rates at 12 and 24 months were 86% and 82%. On Cox regression, larger cavities (PTV > 12 cm3) predicted increased risk of local recurrence (P = .03). TCP modeling demonstrated relationships between improved 1-year local control and higher radiation doses delivered to radio-resistant cavities. Maximum PTV doses of 30, 35, and 40 Gy predicted 78%, 89%, and 94% local control among all radio-resistant cavities, versus 69%, 79%, and 86% among larger radio-resistant cavities. ConclusionsAfter SRS for resected brain metastases, larger cavities are at greater risk of local recurrence. TCP models suggests that higher radiation doses may improve local control among cavities of radio-resistant histology. Given maximum tolerated doses established for single-fraction SRS, fractionated regimens may be required to optimize local control in large radio-resistant cavities.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy with a single isocentre for multiple pulmonary metastases

A 45-year-old male developed a second set of pulmonary metastases 5 years after surgery for extraskeletal mucinous chondrosarcoma of the left shoulder. He already underwent a lobectomy and two segmentectomies for a first set of pulmonary metastases 2 years ago. The closely grouped three nodules within the left lower lung formed a planning target volume (PTV) for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with a single isocentre, which was focused on the centre of the largest nodule (the simultaneous plan). Dose-volume histogram analysis confirmed that the plan was superior to an alternative plan, in which SBRT plans would have been produced for each individual tumour (the individual plan). The mean, maximum and minimum PTV doses were 54.0, 57.5 and 47.3 Gy, respectively, in the simultaneous plan, and 65.6, 87.2 and 52.3 Gy, respectively, in the individual plan. The homogeneity index, conformity index, and the maximum dose delivered to the surrounding healthy lung were 1.21, 0.71, and 37.7 Gy, respectively, in the simultaneous plan and 1.66, 4.44, and 46.2 Gy, respectively, in the individual plan. The patient developed Grade two pneumonitis, but remained healthy until 4 years after the SBRT. When multiple closely grouped metastases are treated using SBRT, the use of a single isocentre should be considered.

Robotic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for renal cell carcinoma in patients with impaired renal function

BackgroundRobotic stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is currently under investigation as a noninvasive treatment option for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). For radiation therapy of RCC, tumor motion and the need for high ablative doses while preserving the remaining renal parenchyma is a challenge. We aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of robotic radiosurgery in RCC in a specific difficult subgroup of patients with impaired renal function.MethodsWe retrospectively identified all patients with RCC, treated with robotic SABR and motion compensation in our institution between 2012 and 2017. Either single fraction SABR of 24 or 25 Gy or 3 fractions of 12 Gy prescribed to the 70% isodose line was applied. Local control, overall survival, radiation side effects were evaluated together with renal function and tumor motion.ResultsWe analyzed data of 13 lesions treated in 10 patients with clear cell RCC and a mean age of 70.5 ± 13.6 years (range: 48–87). Prior to SABR, 8 patients underwent previous complete and/or partial nephrectomy, 7 patients presented with chronic kidney disease ≥ stage 3. The median of minimum, mean and maximum planning target volume doses were 23.2, 29.5 and 35.0 Gy for single fraction and 24.4, 42.5 and 51.4 Gy for the three fractions regime. Persistent local control by robotic SABR was achieved in 9 out of 10 patients (92.3% of all lesions) within a median follow-up period of 27 month (range: 15–54). One patient underwent nephrectomy due to progressive disease and sufficient renal function of the contralateral kidney. Renal function remained stable with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 51.3 ± 19.7 ml/min at baseline and 51.6 ± 25.8 ml/min at follow-up. The largest respiratory-induced tumor motion was seen in superior-inferior direction, compensated by the CyberKnife with mean targeting errors of maximal 2.2 mm.ConclusionsRobotic SABR is technically feasible for the treatment of RCC in preexisting kidney disease with good local tumor control at about 2 years follow-up. Robotic SABR with motion tracking offers a valid treatment option for patients, who are at increased risk for progression to end-stage renal disease due to partial nephrectomy or ablative techniques.

Dosimetric study for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy: magnetic resonance guided linear accelerator versus volumetric modulated arc therapy.

BackgroundStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) given in 1-5 fractions is an effective treatment for vertebral metastases. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) improves soft tissue contrast, which translates into accurate delivery of spine SBRT. Here we report on clinical implementation of MRgRT for spine SBRT, the quality of MRgRT plans compared to TrueBeam based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans in the treatment of spine metastases and benefits of MRgRT MR scan.Patients and methodsTen metastatic lesions were included in this study for plan comparison. Lesions were spread across thoracic spine and lumbosacral spine. Three fraction spine SBRT plans: 27Gy to planning target volume (PTV) and 30Gy to gross tumor volume (GTV) were generated on the ViewRay MRIdian Linac system and compared to TrueBeamTM STx based VMAT plans. Plans were compared using metrics such as minimum dose, maximum dose, mean dose, ratio of the dose to 50% of the volume (R50), conformity index, homogeneity index and dose to the spinal cord.ResultsMRIdian plans achieved equivalent target coverage and spinal cord dose compared to VMAT plans. The maximum and minimum PTV doses and homogeneity index were equivalent for both planning systems. R50 was lower for MRIdian plans compared to VMAT plans, indicating a lower spread of intermediate doses with MRIdian system (5.16 vs. 6.11, p = 0.03).ConclusionsMRgRT can deliver high-quality spine SBRT plans comparable to TrueBeam volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans.

Effect of body thickness on helical and direct treatment delivery modes: a phantom study.

Objective: Chemoradiation therapy is among the standard treatments for cancer, which often causes a decrease in appetite and subsequent weight loss. When weight loss occurs during treatment, the external body contour changes from that indicated during initial planning, causing changes in dose distribution to the target tumor regions and organs at risk (OARs). This study aimed to examine the dose changes to both the target regions and OARs, based on the dose-volume histogram (DVH).Methods: We established a 60 mm-diameter planning target volume (PTV) and a 30 mm-diameter rectum region of interest (OAR), using a phantom; this was followed by a 50 Gy/25 fraction irradiation to the target region that was measured using a two-dimensional-array ion chamber device. The measurement was conducted by varying the bolus thickness from 0 to −25 mm, in 5 mm decrements. In addition, the maximum dose for both PTV and OAR were evaluated based on the DVH, created using the Adaptive software.Results: The gamma analysis showed that the pass rate was less than 95% when the bolus thickness was altered by −25 mm for the helical delivery mode and by −10 mm for the direct delivery mode, resulting in a dose error greater than 3%. Results of the DVH evaluation revealed that the maximum dose of PTV increased by 5.18% when the bolus thickness was −25 mm for helical delivery, whereas a 9.95% increase was noted for the direct delivery mode compared with the dose at the reference level of 0 mm bolus thickness.Discussion: Our results suggest that it is necessary to formulate a new treatment plan owing to increased dose error, if the body thickness decreases by more than 20 mm and 10 mm for the helical and direct delivery modes, respectively. The results also demonstrate that helical delivery is less affected by changes in body thickness than direct delivery.

Fine-tuning the normal tissue objective in eclipse for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy

The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of the normal tissue objective (NTO) on lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) dose distributions. The NTO is a spatially varying constraint used in Eclipse to limit dose to normal tissues by steepening the dose gradient. However, the multitude of potential NTO setting combinations challenges optimal NTO tuning. In the present study, a broad range of NTO settings are investigated for lung SBRT treatment planning with volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT). Ten prior lung SBRT cases were replanned using NTO priorities of 1, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 999 in combination with fall-off values of 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.30, 0.50, 1.00, and 5.00 mm−1 and the automatic NTO. NTO distances to planning target volume (PTV), start dose, and end dose were 1 mm, 100%, and 10%, respectively, for all 600 plans. Prescription dose covered 95% of the PTV. The following metrics were recorded: conformity index (CI), ratio of the 50% prescription isodose volume to PTV (R50%), maximum dose 2 cm away from PTV (D2cm), lung volume of ≥20 Gy (V20Gy), maximum PTV dose (PTVmax), and monitor units (MUs). Differences between prior plans and NTO plans were evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Different combinations of NTO settings resulted in wide-ranging plan quality metrics: CI (1.00 to 1.54), R50% (3.95 to 7.57), D2cm (33.4% to 67.9%), V20Gy (1.66% to 2.75%), MU (1.81 cGy−1 to 4.69 cGy−1), and PTVmax (118% to 175%). Although no settings were optimal for all metrics, a fall-off of 0.15 mm−1 and a priority of 500 best satisfied institutional criteria. Compared with prior plans, NTO plans resulted in significantly lower R50% (4.00 vs 4.35, p = 0.002), lower V20Gy (1.22% vs 1.32%, p = 0.006), and higher PTVmax (138% vs 122%, p = 0.002). All of the prior and well-tuned NTO plans met Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0813 guidelines. Lung SBRT dose distributions were characterized across a range of NTO settings. NTO plans with well-tuned settings compared favorably with prior plans.

Dosimetric Study of Automatic Brain Metastases Planning in Comparison with Conventional Multi-Isocenter Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases.

ObjectiveThe efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using Gamma Knife (GK) (Elekta, Tokyo) is well known. Recently, Automatic Brain Metastases Planning (ABMP) Element (BrainLAB, Tokyo) for a LINAC-based radiation system was commercially released. It covers multiple off-isocenter targets simultaneously inside a multi-leaf collimator field and enables SRS / stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with a single group of LINAC-based dynamic conformal multi-arcs (DCA) for multiple brain metastases. In this study, dose planning of ABMP (ABMP-single isocenter DCA (ABMP-SIDCA)) for SRS of small multiple brain metastases was evaluated in comparison with those of conventional multi-isocenter DCA (MIDCA-SRS) (iPlan, BrainLAB, Tokyo) and GK-SRS (GKRS).MethodsSimulation planning was performed with ABMP-SIDCA and GKRS in the two cases of multiple small brain metastases (nine tumors in both), which had been originally treated with iPlan-MIDCA. First, a dosimetric comparison was done between ABMP-SIDCA and iPlan-MIDCA in the same setting of planning target volume (PTV) margin and D95 (dose covering 95% of PTV volume). Second, dosimetry of GKRS with a margin dose of 20 Gy was compared with that of ABMP-SIDCA in the setting of PTV margin of 0, 1 mm, and 2 mm, and D95=100% dose (20 Gy).ResultsFirst, the maximum dose of PTV and minimum dose of gross tumor volume (GTV) were significantly greater in ABMP-SIDCA than in iPlan-MIDCA. Conformity index (CI, 1/Paddick’s CI) and gradient index (GI, V (half of prescription dose) / V (prescription dose)) in ABMP-SIDCA were comparable with those of iPlan-MIDCA. Second, PIV (prescription isodose volume) of GKRS was consistent with that of 1 mm margin - ABMP-SIDCA plan in Case 1 and that of no-margin ABMP-SIDCA plan in Case 2. Considering the dose gradient, the mean of V (half of prescription dose) of ABMP-SIDCA was not broad, comparable to GKRS, in either Case 1 or 2.ConclusionsThe conformity and dose gradient with ABMP-SIDCA were as good as those of conventional MIDCA for each lesion. If the conditions of the LINAC system permit a minimal PTV margin (1 mm or less), ABMP-SIDCA might provide excellent dose fall-off comparable with that of GKRS thereby enabling a short treatment time.

OPTIMUM TREATMENT MODE APPLIED TO POST-OPERATIVE CERVICAL CANCER FOR 5F-IMRT PLAN BASED ON FOUR VARIABLES IN VARIAN ECLIPSE TPS

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the dosimetric effect on the target volume, organs at risk (OARs) and normal tissues based on the different choice for four types of mechanical variables, i.e., treatment position, dose calculation algorithm, mulitleaf collimator (MLC) motion mode and X-ray energy; and to investigate the optimum treatment mode applied to post-operative cervical cancer for 5-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (5F-IMRT) technique. Methods: The dosimetric difference on the target volume and OARs under the influence of four types of variables were initially compared by changing one variable at a time. Then, based on the above compared results, we compared the dosimetric difference on planning target volume (PTV) and OARs between group A composed of the superior four variables and group B composed of the relatively inferior four variables. The dosimetric parameters included dose distribution of the target volume, OARs and normal tissues, conformal index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), monitor units (MU) and beam-on time ([Formula: see text]. The independent and paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis, and the threshold for statistical significance was [Formula: see text]. Results: Compared with the supine position, the maximum dose of PTV ([Formula: see text]), the maximum dose of small intestine ([Formula: see text]) and [Formula: see text] of bladder ([Formula: see text] were all lower in prone position. In contrast with the pencil beam convolution (PBC), CI of PTV (CI[Formula: see text]) was larger while HI of PTV (HI[Formula: see text]) was lower, both [Formula: see text] and the maximum dose of rectum ([Formula: see text]) were lower using anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA). Moreover, the same results were obtained using sliding window (SW) compared with multiple static segments (MSS). The mean dose of PTV ([Formula: see text] and CI[Formula: see text] was larger while the maximum dose of the spinal cord ([Formula: see text]), [Formula: see text] and the maximum dose of femoral heads were lower with 15 MV X-rays compared with 6 MV X-rays. In comparison with group B comprising the supine position, PBC, MSS and 6 MV X-rays, [Formula: see text] and HI[Formula: see text] decreased 1.4% and 53.4% respectively, CI[Formula: see text] increased 5.8% medially, while [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] all decreased in group A comprising of prone position, AAA, SW and 15 MV X-rays. Conclusion: The treatment mode composed of prone position, AAA algorithm, SW and 15 MV X-rays is chosen for the post-operative cervical cancer of 5F-IMRT technique, which is more capable of meeting the target volume constraints and maximal protection of OARs.

Dosimetric and radiobiological impact of intensity modulated proton therapy and RapidArc planning for high-risk prostate cancer with seminal vesicles.

IntroductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the dosimetric and radiobiological impact of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and RapidArc planning for high‐risk prostate cancer with seminal vesicles.MethodsTen high‐risk prostate cancer cases were included in this retrospective study. For each case, IMPT plans were generated using multiple field optimisation (MFO) technique (two fields) with XiO treatment planning system (TPS), whereas RapidArc plans were generated using double‐arc technique (two full arcs) with Eclipse TPS. IMPT and RapidArc plans were optimised for a total prescription dose of 79.2 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) and 79.2 Gy, respectively, using identical dose–volume constraints. IMPT and RapidArc plans were then normalised such that at least 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) received the prescription dose.ResultsThe mean and maximum PTV doses were comparable in IMPT plans (80.1 ± 0.3 Gy (RBE) and 82.6 ± 1.0 Gy (RBE) respectively) and RapidArc plans (80.3 ± 0.3 Gy and 82.8 ± 0.6 Gy respectively) with P = 0.088 and P = 0.499 respectively. The mean doses of the rectum and bladder were found to be significantly lower in IMPT plans (16.9 ± 5.8 Gy (RBE) and 17.5 ± 5.4 Gy (RBE) respectively) when compared to RapidArc plans (41.9 ± 5.7 Gy and 32.5 ± 7.8 Gy respectively) with P < 0.000 and P < 0.000 respectively. For the rectum, IMPT produced lower V30 (21.0 ± 9.6% vs. 68.5 ± 10.0%; P < 0.000), V50 (14.3 ± 5.8% vs. 45.0 ± 10.0%; P < 0.000) and V70 (6.9 ± 3.4% vs. 12.8 ± 3.6%; P < 0.000) compared to RapidArc. For the bladder, IMPT produced lower V30 (23.2 ± 7.0% vs. 50.9 ± 15.6%; P < 0.000) and V50 (16.6 ± 5.4% vs. 25.1 ± 9.6%; P = 0.001), but similar V70 (9.7 ± 3.5% vs. 10.5 ± 4.2%; P = 0.111) compared to RapidArc. RapidArc produced lower mean dose for both the right femoral head (19.5 ± 4.2 Gy vs. 27.4 ± 4.5 Gy (RBE); P < 0.000) and left femoral head (18.0 ± 4.3 Gy vs. 28.0 ± 5.6 Gy (RBE); P < 0.000). Both IMPT and RapidArc produced comparable bladder normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) (0.6 ± 0.2% vs. 0.5 ± 0.2%; P = 0.152). The rectal NTCP was found to be lower using IMPT (0.8 ± 0.7%) than using RapidArc (1.7 ± 0.7%) with P < 0.000.ConclusionBoth IMPT and RapidArc techniques provided comparable mean and maximum PTV doses. For the rectum, IMPT produced better dosimetric results in the low‐, medium‐ and high‐dose regions and lower NTCP compared to RapidArc. For the bladder, the NTCP and dosimetric results in the high‐dose region were comparable in both sets of plans, whereas IMPT produced better dosimetric results in the low‐ and medium‐dose regions.

Local tumor control probability modeling of primary and secondary lung tumors in stereotactic body radiotherapy

Background and purposeTo evaluate whether local tumor control probability (TCP) in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) varies between lung metastases of different primary cancer sites and between primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and secondary lung tumors. Materials and methodsA retrospective multi-institutional (n=22) database of 399 patients with stage I NSCLC and 397 patients with 525 lung metastases was analyzed. Irradiation doses were converted to biologically effective doses (BED). Logistic regression was used for local tumor control probability (TCP) modeling and the second-order bias corrected Akaike Information Criterion was used for model comparison. ResultsAfter median follow-up of 19months and 16months (n.s.), local tumor control was observed in 87.7% and 86.7% of the primary and secondary lung tumors (n.s.), respectively. A strong dose–response relationship was observed in the primary NSCLC and metastatic cohort but dose–response relationships were not significantly different: the TCD90 (dose to achieve 90% TCP; BED of maximum planning target volume dose) estimates were 176Gy (151–223) and 160Gy (123–237) (n.s.), respectively. The dose–response relationship was not influenced by the primary cancer site within the metastatic cohort. ConclusionsDose–response relationships for local tumor control in SBRT were not different between lung metastases of various primary cancer sites and between primary NSCLC and lung metastases.

SU‐F‐BRB‐04: Comparison of Coplanar VMAT, Non‐Coplanar VMAT, and 4π Treatment Plans

Purpose:The 4π non‐coplanar radiotherapy delivery technique has demonstrated significantly better normal tissue sparing and dose conformality than the clinically used volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). It is unclear whether this is a fundamental limitation of VMAT delivery or the coplanar nature of its typical clinical plans. The non‐coplanar basis of 4π is incorporated into VMAT treatment planning to compare its effect on plan quality.Methods:Clinical stereotactic body radiation therapy plans for 9 liver patients treated with 30–60 Gy using coplanar VMAT (cVMAT) were re‐planned using non‐coplanar VMAT (nVMAT) with 3 arcs and 4 π with 20 intensity‐modulated non‐coplanar fields. All plans were optimized to deliver 100% of the prescribed dose to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV), and nVMAT and 4π plans were tailored to match the maximum and mean PTV dose from the clinical plan. The conformality index (CI), 50% dose spillage volume (R50), normal liver volume receiving &gt;15 Gy (VL&gt;15), and doses to organs at risk (OARs) were compared for all three treatment plans.Results:Compared to cVMAT, the nVMAT and 4π plans reduced VL&gt;15 by an average of 30.6 cm3 and 96.3 cm3, respectively. The average CI was also reduced from 1.22 (cVMAT) to 1.17 (nVMAT) and 1.14 (4π), indicating higher conformality in the same order. Similarly, R50 was reduced from 3.87 (cVMAT) to 3.58 (nVMAT) and 2.74 (4π). With the exception of the mean right kidney dose, which increased by an average of only 0.6 Gy for nVMAT, the dose differences to OARs were not statistically significant between the two VMAT plans. 4π plans either significantly decreased or maintained OAR doses.Conclusion:While the manual selection of intuitive non‐coplanar arcs does show some improvement over coplanar VMAT, the automated beam selection for 4π still results in superior plan quality.This project is supported in part by Varian Medical Systems and NIH R43 CA183390.

Palliative radiotherapy for thoracic spine metastases: Dosimetric advantage of three-dimensional conformal plans.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the dosimetric advantages of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for thoracic spine metastases and compare it with conventional two-dimensional (2D) plans. Radiation therapy (RT) planning data of 10 patients with mid-to-low thoracic spine metastases were analyzed. Computed tomography simulation was performed and the planning target volume (PTV), heart, esophagus, lung and spinal cord were contoured. The 3DCRT plan comprised one posteroanterior (PA) field and two posterior oblique fields. The 2D plans used a single PA field or opposed anteroposterior (AP)/PA fields. The prescription dose of radiation was 30 Gy in 10 fractions. All comparisons of the maximum or mean doses to the organs at risk or the PTV, between two of the three RT plans, demonstrated statistically significant differences (P<0.05), with the exception of the mean esophageal doses between the single PA vs. AP/PA (P=0.285) plans. The mean heart doses were 15.0±3.1 Gy in single PA, 17.3±4.3 Gy in AP/PA and 8.5±1.7 Gy using 3DCRT. The median reduction rates using 3DCRT were 38.9% compared with single PA (range, 29.4-58.5%) or 47.5% relative to AP/PA (range, 34.5-67.1%). The mean esophageal doses were 17.9±2.3 Gy in single PA, 18.2±2.2 Gy in AP/PA and 15.3±1.9 Gy in 3DCRT. The median reduction rate using 3DCRT was 12.8% compared with single PA or 15.6% relative to AP/PA. Compared with the single PA or AP/PA 2D plan, 3DCRT reduced the median dose by 13.7 or 1.9% of the maximum spinal cord dose, respectively, and 14.7 or 2.9% of the maximum PTV dose, respectively. The mean lung doses were 2.7±0.7 Gy in single PA, 2.6±0.7 Gy in AP/PA and 5.1±1.0 Gy in 3DCRT. In conclusion, 3DCRT for mid-to-low thoracic spine metastases demonstrated significant dosimetric advantages by reducing the unnecessary irradiation of critical organs, particularly the heart, and by achieving a homogeneous target dose.

Dosimetric feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging‐guided tri-cobalt 60 preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to investigate the dosimetric differences of delivering preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to patients with soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity (ESTS) with a teletherapy system equipped with 3 rotating 60Co sources and a built-in magnetic resonance imaging and with standard linear accelerator (LINAC)‐based IMRT. Methods and materialsThe primary study population consisted of 9 patients treated with preoperative radiation for ESTS between 2008 and 2014 with LINAC-based static field IMRT. LINAC plans were designed to deliver 50 Gy in 25 fractions to 95% of the planning target volume (PTV). Tri-60Co system IMRT plans were designed with ViewRay system software. ResultsTri-60Co‐based IMRT plans achieved equivalent target coverage and dosimetry for organs at risk (long bone, skin, and skin corridor) compared with LINAC-based IMRT plans. The maximum and minimum PTV doses, heterogeneity indices, and ratio of the dose to 50% of the volume were equivalent for both planning systems. One LINAC plan violated the maximum bone dose constraint, whereas none of the tri-60Co plans did. ConclusionsUsing a tri-60Co system, we were able to achieve equivalent dosimetry to the PTV and organs at risk for patients with ESTS compared with LINAC-based IMRT plans. The tri-60Co system may be advantageous over current treatment platforms by allowing PTV reduction and by elimination of the additional radiation dose associated with daily image guidance, but this needs to be evaluated prospectively.

Investigation of pulsed IMRT and VMAT for re-irradiation treatments: dosimetric and delivery feasibilities

Many tumor cells demonstrate hyperradiosensitivity at doses below ∼50 cGy. Together with the increased normal tissue repair under low dose rate, the pulsed low dose rate radiotherapy (PLDR), which separates a daily fractional dose of 200 cGy into 10 pulses with 3 min interval between pulses (∼20 cGy/pulse and effective dose rate 6.7 cGy min−1), potentially reduces late normal tissue toxicity while still providing significant tumor control for re-irradiation treatments. This work investigates the dosimetric and technical feasibilities of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based PLDR treatments using Varian Linacs. Twenty one cases (12 real re-irradiation cases) including treatment sites of pancreas, prostate, pelvis, lung, head-and-neck, and breast were recruited for this study. The lowest machine operation dose rate (100 MU min−1) was employed in the plan delivery. Ten-field step-and-shoot IMRT and dual-arc VMAT plans were generated using the Eclipse TPS with routine planning strategies. The dual-arc plans were delivered five times to achieve a 200 cGy daily dose (∼20 cGy arc−1). The resulting plan quality was evaluated according to the heterogeneity and conformity indexes (HI and CI) of the planning target volume (PTV). The dosimetric feasibility of retaining the hyperradiosensitivity for PLDR was assessed based on the minimum and maximum dose in the target volume from each pulse. The delivery accuracy of VMAT and IMRT at the 100 MU min−1 machine operation dose rate was verified using a 2D diode array and ion chamber measurements. The delivery reproducibility was further investigated by analyzing the Dynalog files of repeated deliveries. A comparable plan quality was achieved by the IMRT (CI 1.10–1.38; HI 1.04–1.10) and the VMAT (CI 1.08–1.26; HI 1.05–1.10) techniques. The minimum/maximum PTV dose per pulse is 7.9 ± 5.1 cGy/33.7 ± 6.9 cGy for the IMRT and 12.3 ± 4.1 cGy/29.2 ± 4.7 cGy for the VMAT. Six out of the 186 IMRT pulses (fields) were found to exceed 50 cGy maximum PTV dose per pulse while the maximum PTV dose per pulse was within 40 cGy for all the VMAT pulses (arcs). However, for VMAT plans, the dosimetric quality of the entire treatment plan was less superior for the breast cases and large irregular targets. The gamma passing rates for both techniques at the 100 MU min−1 dose rate were at least 94.1% (3%/3 mm) and the point dose measurements agreed with the planned values to within 2.2%. The average root mean square error of the leaf position was 0.93 ± 0.83 mm for IMRT and 0.53 ± 0.48 mm for VMAT based on the Dynalog file analysis. The RMS error of the leaf position was nearly identical for the repeated deliveries of the same plans. In general, both techniques are feasible for PLDR treatments. VMAT was more advantageous for PLDR with more uniform target dose per pulse, especially for centrally located tumors. However, for large, irregular and/or peripheral tumors, IMRT could produce more favorable PLDR plans. By taking the biological benefit of PLDR delivery and the dosimetric benefit of IMRT and VMAT, the proposed methods have a great potential for those previously-irradiated recurrent patients.