Maximum Anal Squeeze Pressure Research Articles

Enhanced Approach to Treating Chronic Anal Fissures: Fissurectomy with Vertical Non-full-thickness Midline Sphincterotomy and Mucosal Advancement Flap.

Lateral internal sphincterotomy is a conventional surgical intervention for chronic anal fissures, yet the potential for postoperative anal incontinence underscores the need for an alternative approach. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients with chronic fissures who underwent a combination of fissurectomy, vertical non-full thickness midline sphincterotomy (VNMS), and mucosal advancement flap (MAF), as a means of mitigating the risk of incontinence. This retrospective analysis included forty-six consecutive patients with chronic anal fissures, unresponsive to topical diltiazem, who underwent fissurectomy combined with VNMS and MAF between April 2018 and May 2023. Primary outcome measures encompassed fissure healing rates. Continence was assessed using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), and manometric assessments were conducted before the procedure and three months postoperatively. With a median follow-up of 27 months, there were no postoperative complications, and the overall fissure healing rate reached 96% (44/46). At three months post-procedure, FISI scores were reduced to 0, with no instances of fecal soiling. Anal resting pressure exhibited a significant reduction at 3 months [pre-op: 133 (95% CI, 128-150) vs. 3 mo: 109 (95% CI, 100-117) cmH2O; p = 0.01]. Similarly, maximum anal squeeze pressure showed a significant decrease three months post-surgery [pre-op: 317 cmH2O (95% CI, 294-380) vs. 3 mo: 291 cmH2O (95% CI, 276-359), p = 0.03]. The combination of fissurectomy, VNMS, and MAF proved to be an effective approach for chronic anal fissures, yielding favorable medium-term outcomes without postoperative anal incontinence.

Normal Values of High-resolution Anorectal Manometry of Healthy Indians

Background/AimsHigh-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) measures anal sphincter function and anorectal co-ordination. This study aims to provide normal data for HRAM and evaluate the effect of gender, age, and body mass index (BMI) on anorectal functions in healthy Indian subjects.MethodsHRAM was performed on 93 healthy volunteers using a 20-channel, water-perfused catheter. We evaluated anorectal pressures, rectal sensation, and balloon expulsion time. Measurements were recorded during rest, squeeze, and simulated defecation (push).ResultsMedian anal resting pressure (88 mmHg vs 94 mmHg, P = NS), anal squeeze pressure (165 mmHg vs 147 mmHg, P = NS) were not significantly different between males and females. Rectal pressure (70 mmHg vs 54 mmHg, P = 0.024) and anal pressure (82 mmHg vs 63 mmHg, P = 0.008) during simulated evacuation without rectal distention, were higher in males. The threshold for the first sensation was lower in females (40 mL vs 30 mL, P = 0.021) but desire to defecate (105 mL vs 90 mL, P = NS) and maximum tolerable volume (160 mL vs 140 mL, P = NS) were not significantly different in males and females. Anal residual pressure (median mmHg 83 vs 71 mmHg, P = 0.025) was higher in subjects < 40 years of age. Maximum anal squeeze pressure (185 mmHg vs 165 mmHg, P = 0.024) and maximum rectal pressure (75 mmHg vs 62 mmHg, P = 0.032) during push higher in BMI < 23 kg/m2.ConclusionsThe present study provides normal data for the Indian population that can be used for comparison and further work. Age, gender, and BMI affect anorectal parameters in HRAM and should be considered while reporting.

Correlation Between Poor Defecation Habits and Postoperative Hemorrhoid Recurrence.

BackgroundThe relationship between hemorrhoid recurrence and poor defecation habits is poorly understood. This study aimed to analyze the effects of poor defecation habits on postoperative hemorrhoid recurrence.Materials and MethodWe performed a retrospective study on 1,162 consecutive patients who underwent a surgical procedure for hemorrhoids at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from December 2016 to May 2020. All patients were followed for 12 months post-operatively. Patients were monitored for disease recurrence. Patient defecation habits were assessed using an obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) score.ResultsPatients with a score of 0–4 had a mild defecation disorder, 5–8 a moderate defecation disorder, and 9 or more ODS. Of the 1,162 patients, 1,144 (98.45%) had a mild defecation disorder, 13 (1.12%) had a moderate defecation disorder, and 9 (0.43%) had ODS. Older patients were significantly more likely to have worse defecation habits (P < 0.001). A higher ODS score correlated with a higher maximum anal squeeze pressure (P = 0.07) and a more severe inability for the anus to relax during simulated evacuation (P = 0.002). The maximum rectum threshold was also found to be the highest in ODS patients (P = 0.010). The proportion of Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) was the highest in the moderate defecation disorder group (53.85), followed by the ODS group (40.00) and the mild defecation disorder group (P = 0.023). Recurrence occurred in 5.51% of patients in the mild defecation disorder group, 38.46% of the moderate defecation disorder group, and 60% of the ODS group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed a higher ODS score (P < 0.001) was an independent predictor of recurrence. Furthermore, patients who occasionally exercised (P = 0.01) and patients who exercised regularly (P = 0.021) were less likely to have a recurrence.ConclusionPatients with unresolved defecation disorders are more likely to have their hemorrhoids recur and are unlikely to be satisfied with surgical management.

Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence.

INTRODUCTION:Biofeedback therapy (BFT) is a well-known treatment for functional anorectal disorders. The effect of BFT was monitored in fecal incontinence (FI) patients with the Fecobionics test and with the conventional technologies, anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET).METHODS:Studies were performed in 12 patients before and after 8 weeks of biofeedback training. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score was obtained. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were measured before the bag was distended in the rectum until urge to defecate. Pressure recordings were made during Fecobionics evacuation.RESULTS:BFT resulted in 24% reduction in FISI scores (P < 0.01). Seven patients were characterized as responders. Anal pressures, the urge-to-defecate volume, and defecatory parameters did not change significantly during BFT. For ARM-BET, the maximum anal squeeze pressure, the urge-to-defecate volume, and the expulsion time were lower after BFT compared with those before BFT (P < 0.05). For Fecobionics, the change in urge volume (r = 0.74, P < 0.05) and the change in defecation index (r = 0.79, P < 0.01) were associated with the change in FISI score. None of the ARM-BET parameters were associated with the change in FISI score. It was studied whether any pre-BFT data could predict treatment success. The Fecobionics expulsion duration and the defecation index predicted the outcome (P < 0.05). The defecation index had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 72%. None of the ARM-BET parameters predicted the outcome (all P > 0.2).DISCUSSION:Fecobionics was used as a tool to monitor the effect of BFT and proved better than conventional technologies for monitoring and predicting the outcome in the FISI score.

Effect of Kangfuxin Solution Fumigation Bath on Postoperative Patients with Hemorrhoid PPH and Influence on the Postoperative Complications.

Surgery is now the main clinical treatment for hemorrhoids, and the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) is the commonly used procedure. The key to evaluating the efficacy of surgery includes the quality of postoperative wound healing and the occurrence of complications, so it is especially important to enhance the postoperative rehabilitation of hemorrhoids. This study investigates the method of postoperative treatment with Kangfuxin solution fumigation bath to explore the role of this method in the efficacy of patients after hemorrhoid PHH surgery and its effect on postoperative complications. It will accumulate some relevant information to improve the efficacy of hemorrhoid surgery and postoperative complications and open new ideas for further postoperative rehabilitation of other diseases in the anal area. A total of 106 patients with hemorrhoids were included in this study, all of whom were treated with PHH surgery. After surgery, they were randomly divided into a control group treated with warm water sitz bath and an observation group treated with Kangfuxin solution fumigation bath, with 53 cases in each group. We observed all patients' postoperative pain, bleeding, and perianal edema on a daily basis after surgery; we recorded the time of wound healing and hospital stay. The maximum anal squeeze pressure (MASP), anal defecation diastole pressure (ADDP), anal resting pressure (ARP), and the length of the high-pressure zone (HPZ) were used as observation indicators to evaluate the anal function of the patients before and after treatment. The results of the evaluation of the efficacy of patients after the treatment period showed that the total effective rate of treatment in the observation group (92.45%) was significantly higher than that of the control group (77.36%). The postoperative recovery showed that the wound healing time, hospitalization time, pain, bleeding, and edema scores at 3 and 5 days after surgery were lower in the observation group than in the control group; MASP and ARP increased in both groups after treatment compared to before treatment, with more increase in the observation group. The results suggest that patients with hemorrhoids after PPH should pay attention to postoperative care and rehabilitation. It also reveals that the application of Kangfuxin solution fumigation treatment has a significant effect, which can effectively reduce the patient's wound healing and hospital stay, while improving the patient's anal function and reducing postoperative complications, and is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Normal Values and Associated Factors in High-resolution Anorectal Manometry in Healthy Vietnamese Adults

Abstract Introduction The present study aims to identify normal high-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) values and related factors in healthy Vietnamese adults. Methods The present cross-sectional study was conducted at the Viet Duc hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam, during April and May 2019. Healthy volunteers were recruited to participate in the study. Anorectal measurement values from the digestive tract, including pressure, were recorded. Results A total of 76 healthy volunteers were recruited. The mean functional anal canal length was 4.2 ± 0.5 cm, while the mean anal high-pressure zone length was 3.4 ± 0.5 cm. The mean defecation index was 1.4 ± 0.8, with values ranging from 0.3 to 5.0. The mean threshold volume to elicit the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was 18.1 mL. The mean rectal sensation values were 32.4 mL, 81.6 mL, and 159 mL for first sensation, desire to defecate, and urge to defecate, respectively. Dyssynergic patterns occurred in ∼ 50% of the study participants and included mainly types I (27.6%) and III (14.6%). There were significant differences between male and female patients in terms of maximum anal squeeze pressure, maximum anal cough pressure, maximum anal strain pressure, maximum rectal cough pressure, and maximum rectal strain pressure (all p &lt; 0.01). Conclusions The present study establishes normal HRAM values in healthy Vietnamese adults, particularly regarding normal values of anorectal pressure and rectal sensation. Further studies that include larger sample sizes should be conducted to further confirm the constants and their relationships.

Improvement of Patient Satisfaction and Anorectal Manometry Parameters After Biofeedback Therapy in Patients with Different Types of Dyssynergic Defecation.

Biofeedback is a well-known and effective treatment for patients with fecal evacuation disorder (FED). The main purpose of this study was to investigate the outcome and the effects of biofeedback therapy on physiological parameters as assessed by manometry in patients with FED. Data from 114 consecutive patients with FED who underwent biofeedback therapy in Sara Gastrointestinal clinic in Tehran, Iran during 2015-2018 were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed. All participants underwent a comprehensive evaluation of anorectal function that included anorectal manometry and a balloon expulsion test at the baseline and after biofeedback therapy. Maximum anal squeeze pressure and sustained anal squeeze pressure were improved up to 100% and 94.7% of normal values in the patients after biofeedback, respectively (P < 0.001). First rectal sensation, was significantly decreased (25 ± 18.5 vs. 15.5 ± 5.2) while the maximum tolerable volume was significantly increased (233.6 ± 89.7 vs. 182.4 ± 23.1) after biofeedback therapy (P < 0.001). Type I dyssynergia was the most common type, effecting 82 cases (71.9%) of our patients. Dyssynergia parameters were improved 50-80% in 34 (41.5%) and 10 (31.3%) type I and non-type I patients, respectively. Over 80% improvement of dyssynergia parameters occurred in 48 (58.5%) and 22 (68.8%) type I and non-type I patients, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.3). In addition, the ability to reject the balloon was significantly better in post intervention measurements (P < 0.001). Biofeedback not only improves the symptoms in patients of FED but also reverses more than 80% the dyssynergic parameters of defecation. However, due to the general effectiveness of biofeedback treatment in different types of DD, there were no significant differences between their improvement scores.

HIGH-RESOLUTION ANORECTAL MANOMETRY IN TESTING ANORECTAL FUNCTION AFTER COMBINATION TREATMENT FOR RECTAL CANCER

The purpose of the study was to evaluate anorectal function with high-resolution anorectal manometry in patients receiving combination treatment for rectal cancer. Material and methods. We analyzed literature data (PubMed, Scopus, eLIBRARY databases) and our treatment outcomes in 50 rectal cancer patients receiving combination or surgical treatment at Rostov Research Institute of Oncology. Results. The mean anal resting pressure was 1.8 times lower, and the maximal anal squeeze pressure was 1.5 times lower in patients after combination treatment, compared to surgical treatment (p&lt;0.05). 3 months after combination treatment with prolonged radiotherapy, contractile properties of the internal sphincter were decreased in 83.3%, of the external sphincter - in 26.7% of patients. Fatigue rate of external sphincter muscles was increased in 17 (56.7%) patients of this group. We observed a correlation between some anorectal manometry data and the LARS score: in both groups, patients with the maximal LARS score showed the lowest mean anal resting pressure, compared to patients with minimal and average LaRs scores (p&lt;0.05). Conclusion. Due to negative effect of radiation therapy on the anorectal function, careful selection of patients who will benefit from radiation therapy is very important, as well as identification of patients with a high risk of radiation-induced functional problems and development of rehabilitation programs for patients treated for rectal cancer.

Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing does not provide useful information in guiding therapy for fecal incontinence.

Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) testing is a standard recommendation for the evaluation of fecal incontinence. Its role in guiding therapy for fecal incontinence has been previously questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between PNTML testing and anorectal dysfunction. This was a retrospective analysis of data collected prospectively from patients who presented to a pelvic floor disorder center from 2007 to 2015. The relationship between PNTML (normal versus delayed) and anorectal manometry, fecal incontinence severity, and fecal incontinence-related quality of life scores was assessed using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. Two hundred sixty-nine patients underwent PNTML testing, and 91.1% were female (N = 245) (median age 62.2years). Normal PNTML was seen in 234 (87.0%) patients. Among 268 patients who underwent anorectal manometry, delayed PNTML was only significantly associated with median maximum anal squeeze pressure (P = 0.04). Delayed PNTML was not associated with a decrease in median fecal incontinence severity or fecal incontinence-related quality of life scores (N = 99). PNTML was only associated with median maximum anal squeeze pressure, and it was not associated with patient-reported severity of symptoms of fecal incontinence, changes in quality of life attributable to fecal incontinence, median mean resting anal pressure, or median maximum resting anal pressure. PNTML testing may not be relevant to current therapeutic algorithms for fecal incontinence and its routine use should be questioned.

Normal values for solid state high resolution anorectal manometry in healthy adult volunteers

Objective: To explore the normal values for two-dimension solid state high resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) in healthy adult volunteers. Methods: The healthy adult volunteers were recruited by advertisement and underwent solid state HRAM in the left lateral position. Anorectal pressures and rectal sensation were recorded and analyzed. Results: (1) A total of 126 Chinese healthy adult volunteers (male: 50 cases (39.7%); age: (37.5±14.2) years old ) were recruited in this study. (2) Mean anal resting pressure (MERP) was (71.8±17.3) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). Maximum anal resting pressure (MARP) was (79.3±17.8) mmHg, Maximum anal squeeze pressure (MSP) was (178.7±52.8) mmHg. Anal high pressure zone (HPZ) length was (3.4±0.6) cm. During simulated evacuation, residual anal pressure (RAP) was (63.8±20.5) mmHg, and anal relaxation rate (ARR) was (37.0±11.5)%. Rectal threshold volume for first sensation (FST), desire to defecate (DDT), urgency to defecate (UDT) and maximum discomfort (MDT) was (47.4±10.0) ml, (84.5±18.2) ml, (125.8±28.5) ml, and (175.5±36.1) ml, respectively. (3) Compared with female subjects, male subjects had higher MSP[(211.0±50.7) mmHg vs (157.5±42.5) mmHg], RAP[(71.6±18.1) mmHg vs (58.8±20.5) mmHg]and rectal MDT[(187.0±36.4) mmHg vs (168.0±34.1)mmHg], but lower ARR[(32.1±8.0)% vs (40.2±12.3)%], all P<0.01. (4) MERP, MARP, MSP and rectal MDT were higher in young group (≤40 years old), all P<0.05. Conclusions: These observations provide normal values for two-dimension solid state HRAM, which have significant difference between genders and different age groups.

Anorectal Function and Quality of Life after Transrectal Rigid-Hybrid Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Sigmoidectomy

In transrectal rigid-hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic sigmoidectomy (trNS), extraction-site laparotomy is avoided, which reduces postoperative pain and improves recovery time. However, current research evaluating anorectal function after trNS is limited. This study aims to evaluate clinical continence, anorectal manometry, and quality of life in patients undergoing trNS for diverticular disease. Between November 2013 and October 2015, patients undergoing trNS for diverticular disease were prospectively included. Patients converted to laparoscopic resection with an extraction-site laparotomy before attempted transrectal access were excluded. Anorectal manometry, including measurement of resting pressure, squeeze pressure, and retention tests; and questionnaires on continence, defecation, quality of life, and cosmesis, were obtained before and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the study. Four were converted and 1 was lost to follow-up, leaving 20 patients included in the study. Mean anal resting pressure before surgery was 59.3 mmHg (95% CI, 51.81-66.79 mmHg), decreasing to 48.85 mmHg (95% CI, 43.75-53.95 mmHg) at 3 months (p= 0.015). It normalized to 53.45 mmHg (95% CI, 47.78-59.12 mmHg) at 6 months (p= 0.168). Maximum anal squeeze pressure, retention tests, and St Marks incontinence score remained unchanged during the follow-up. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index remained high before (124 points) and at 6 months after surgery (128.8 points; p= 0.544). Six months after trNS, neither clinical continence nor manometric findings deteriorated. Quality of life after trNS for recurrent diverticulitis is excellent. Long-term implications of a temporary decline in resting pressure after 3 months remain unclear and warrant long-term follow-up.

Anorectal Manometric and Urodynamic Parameters According to the Spinal Cord Injury Lesion.

ObjectiveTo assess the correlation between the anorectal function and bladder detrusor function in patients with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) according to the type of lesion.MethodsMedical records of twenty-eight patients with SCI were included in this study. We compared the anorectal manometric and urodynamic (UD) parameters in total subjects. We analyzed the anorectal manometric and UD parameters between the two groups: upper motor neuron (UMN) lesion and lower motor neuron (LMN) lesion. In addition, we reclassified the total subjects into two groups according to the bladder detrusor function: overactive and non-overactive.ResultsIn the group with LMN lesion, the mean value of maximal anal squeeze pressure (MSP) was slightly higher than that in the group with UMN lesion, and the ratio of MSP to maximal anal resting pressure (MRP) was statistically significant different between the two groups. In addition, although the mean value of MSP was slightly higher in the group with non-overactive detrusor function, there was no statistical correlation of anorectal manometric parameters between the groups with overactive and non-overactive detrusor function.ConclusionThe MSP and the ratio of MSP to MRP were higher in the group with LMN lesion. In this study, we could not identify the correlation between bladder and bowel function in total subjects. We conclude that the results of UD study alone cannot predict the outcome of anorectal manometry in patients with SCI. Therefore, it is recommended to perform assessment of anorectal function with anorectal manometry in patients with SCI.

Characterization of Anorectal Functions and Overall Colonic Transit in Female and Male Patients with Dyssynergic Defecation

Purpose: In non-elderly healthy people, there are no significant differences between genders in anal sphincter resting pressure1 or colonic transit2. There is a paucity of information regarding males with dyssynergic defecation (DD). Gender differences have not previously been evaluated in patients with DD. Our purpose was to compare anal sphincter pressures, balloon expulsion weights, and overall colonic transit by gender in DD. Methods: Medical records of 407 patients with constipation in whom a diagnosis of DD was made, based on evaluation by a single gastroenterologist (MC) at a tertiary medical center, were reviewed. Data from a previously published cohort of 390 patients (1994 to 2011) was updated to include patients up to June 2012. DD was characterized by anorectal manometry (ARM), balloon expulsion test, and overall colonic transit using validated scintigraphy. Primary endpoints were maximum anal resting pressure (ARP), maximum anal squeeze pressure (ASP), added weight (BW) to allow balloon expulsion (data censored if patient unable to expel balloon despite addition of >470 g) and overall colonic transit (geometric center, GC) at 24h (GC24). Effects of gender on study endpoints were assessed by Mann-Whitney rank sum test. Our lab previously reported normal GC24 values in 209 controls3: median=2.3 (IQR 1.8, 2.9): males (n=72): 2.6 (2.1, 3.1); females (n=136): 2.1 (1.7, 2.6). Results: The DD patient cohort consisted of 66 males (M) and 341 females (F). Median (IQR) values of age and BMI were: 45.5y (30.0, 58.0) and 23.6 kg/m2 (21.5, 26.3) for M; 37.0y (26.0, 49.0) and 21.4 kg/m2 (19.1, 24.5) for F. Significant differences by gender were observed in ARP, ASP and GC24. GC24 was significantly slower in both genders compared to same gender controls. Data in table are median (IQR) values with corresponding n=size/group in DD patients. Conclusion: Patients with DD have slower overall colonic transit compared to gender matched controls. In DD patients, males have significantly higher resting and squeeze anal sphincter pressures, and females have slower overall colonic transit at 24 hours. These data suggest that interpretation of tests in patients with suspected DD should be based on data from same gender controls.Table: [1748]

The effect of neo-rectal wall properties on functional outcome after colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis

Background/aimsIt has been suggested that normal function of both anal sphincters is essential for a good functional outcome after colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis (CPAA). However, CPAA patients may have impaired continence despite adequate sphincter function. The present study was designed to identify those factors, which contribute to the functional outcome after a handsewn CPAA.Materials and methodsForty patients were studied before and 1 year after pouch surgery. Faecal continence was evaluated using the Rockwood faecal incontinence severity index (RFISI). At both occasions, maximum anal resting pressure (MARP) and maximum anal squeeze pressure (MASP) were recorded. In addition, sensory perception threshold-volumes (SPT-V) and compliance were assessed using an ‘infinitely’ compliant polyethylene bag connected to an electronic barostat assembly.ResultsThe median RFISI score 1 year after surgery was higher than the median RFISI score before surgery (13 vs 7 (p < 0.01). The median MARP dropped significantly (p < 0.01) whereas the median MASP remained unaffected. The mean compliance, calculated at three different sensation levels, and the pouch sensory perception threshold-volumes (PSPT-V) were lower than those of the original rectum (p < 0.05). The reduction of MARP showed no correlation with the post-operative change in RFISI scores. Low PC and low PSPT-V were associated with higher RFISI scores.ConclusionLow pouch compliance and low SPT-V adversely affect functional outcome after a handsewn colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis.

Long-term results of postanal repair for neurogenic faecal incontinence.

Between 1984 and 1986, 54 patients underwent postanal repair for neurogenic faecal incontinence. Forty-two (41 women) were available for follow-up 5-8 (median 6.2) years after operation. Of these, 34 women attended for clinical and anorectal physiological assessment. Anal endosonography was also performed in 30 patients. In the 34 patients examined, continence categories (Browning and Parks' classification) of C (n = 12) and D (n = 22) before surgery became A (n = 2), B (n = 12), C (n = 16) and D (n = 1) at 6 months and A (n = 4), B (n = 5), C (n = 21) and D (n = 4) at 5-8 years. Nine patients therefore had continence for solids and liquids, five of whom were incontinent to flatus, in the long term. Assessment of outcome by patients revealed long-term improvement in 28 and no change in six. Two of the 34 patients assessed were housebound because of incontinence. Of the total of 54 patients, only one required a stoma. The length of the anal canal increased significantly from a preoperative median (range) of 2.0 (1.5-4.0) cm to 3.8 (1.8-5.5) cm 5-8 years after surgery. Perineal descent at rest decreased markedly. Progression of neuromuscular damage was demonstrated by prolongation of the pudendal nerve terminal motor latency from a median (range) 2.38 (1.80-3.35) ms to 2.80 (2.20-4.25) ms and increasing median (range) fibre density in the external sphincter, from 1.86 (1.76-2.40) to 3.63 (2.03-6.20). The pudendal nerve terminal latency was the only preoperative physiological variable that correlated significantly with long-term outcome (A and B 2.20 ms versus C and D 2.65 ms, P < 0.05). At long-term assessment, maximal anal squeeze pressure was the only physiological variable that correlated significantly with clinical outcome. Anal endosonography revealed a clinically undetected sphincter defect in 19 of 30 patients examined but the presence of a defect did not relate to clinical outcome.

Abnormal transient internal sphincter relaxation in idiopathic pruritus ani: physiological evidence from ambulatory monitoring.

Patients with idiopathic pruritus ani have an abnormal rectoanal inhibitory reflex and a lower threshold for internal sphincter relaxation during the saline continence test. This led to the hypothesis that these patients may exhibit abnormalities of the transient internal anal sphincter relaxation reflex. To study this, 23 men of median age 41 (range 27-64) years with idiopathic pruritus ani and 16 male controls of median age 39 (range 26-68) years were assessed using computerized ambulatory anorectal electromyography and manometry. Resting anal pressure, maximum anal squeeze pressure, internal sphincter electromyogram frequency, the number of internal sphincter relaxations and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency were similar for the two groups. The rise in rectal pressure during internal sphincter relaxation was higher in patients with pruritus than in controls (median (range) 29 (18-60) versus 18 (11-37) cmH2O, P < 0.01). Furthermore, the fall in anal pressure was greater in patients with pruritus than in controls (median (range) 39 (15-52) versus 29 (21-43) cmH2O, P < 0.01). The duration of internal sphincter relaxation was prolonged in patients compared with controls (median (range) 29 (18-55) versus 8 (5-12) s, P < 0.001). Fourteen patients reported staining of underclothes and 17 complained of perianal itch within 1 h of these episodes of abnormal internal sphincter relaxation. Pruritus ani may result from occult faecal leakage as a result of abnormal transient internal sphincter relaxation.

Integrity of the Anal Sphincters After Pouch-Anal Anastomosis: Evaluation With Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasonography

The aim of the present study was to assess the integrity of the anal sphincters after handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis performed with the help of a Scott retractor. For this purpose the anal sphincters were visualized with three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography. Patients undergoing a colonic pouch-anal anastomosis or an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were included. Before and six months after the procedure, the length and volume of both sphincters were assessed with three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography, and anal manometry was performed. Continence scores were determined using the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI). Fifteen patients with a colonic pouch and 13 patients with an ileal pouch were examined. Six months after the procedure, three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography showed significant alterations of the internal anal sphincter in eight patients with a colonic pouch-anal anastomosis (53 percent) and in eight patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (62 percent). These alterations were characterized by asymmetry or thinning. No defects were seen in the colonic pouch group, but, in two patients with an ileal pouch, a small defect in the internal anal sphincter was found. A decrease in internal anal sphincter volume was seen only in patients with a colonic pouch-anal anastomosis (P = 0.009). In both groups the length of the internal anal sphincter and the length, thickness, and volume of the external anal sphincter remained the same. After the procedure a reduction of maximum anal resting pressure was found in both groups (colonic pouch: P < 0.001, ileal pouch: P = 0.001). Maximum anal squeeze pressure was reduced in only patients with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (P = 0.006). The observed alterations of the internal anal sphincter and the manometric findings showed no correlation with the postoperative Fecal Incontinence Severity Index scores. Handsewn pouch-anal anastomosis, performed with the help of a Scott retractor, only rarely leads to internal anal sphincter defects, but three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography shows alterations of the internal anal sphincter in 57 percent of the patients. No correlation was observed between these alterations and the functional outcome.

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in the UK.

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an effective therapy for faecal incontinence. Published studies derive largely from single centres and there is a need to determine the broader applicability of this procedure. Prospective data were collected for all patients undergoing SNS in the UK. Records were reviewed to determine the outcome of treatment. In three UK centres 59 patients underwent peripheral nerve evaluation, with 46 (78 per cent) proceeding to permanent implantation. Of these 46 patients (40 women) all but two had improved continence at a median of 12 (range 1-72) months. Faecal incontinence improved from a median (range) of 7.5 (1-78) to 1 (0-39) episodes per week (P < 0.001). Urgency improved in all but five of 39 patients in whom ability to defer defaecation was determined, improving from a median of 1 (range 0-5) to 10 (range from 1 to more than 15) min (P < 0.001). Maximum anal squeeze pressure and sensory function to rectal distension changed significantly. Significant improvement occurred in general health (P = 0.024), mental health (P = 0.008), emotional role (P = 0.034), social function (P = 0.013) and vitality (P = 0.009) subscales of the Short Form 36 health survey questionnaire. There were no major complications. One implant was removed. SNS is a safe and effective treatment, in the medium to long term, for faecal incontinence when conservative treatment has failed.

Customized biofeedback therapy improves results in fecal incontinence.

Biofeedback therapy has been extensively used and accepted in fecal incontinence, but reports of its efficiency vary. We evaluated feedback therapy efficiency when (a) selecting the patient's subject of the therapy, and (b) customizing the therapy protocol used for each patient. Fifty-three patients with fecal incontinence were selected for biofeedback training. The treatment program was customized for each patient depending on the underlying dysfunction, the patient's cooperative and learning attitude, and the patient's progress. Biofeedback efficiency was measured using clinical scores, subjective satisfaction of the patient, and manometry. Incontinent scores showed improvement in 66% of patients and good improvement in 11% and 15%, respectively, indicating an overall excellent effect of the therapy. Subjective satisfaction was strongly correlated with the previous incontinent scores. Comparison of manometry parameters before and after biofeedback therapy, including maximum anal resting, maximum anal squeeze pressure, and maximum duration of the squeeze, all showed significant differences. In addition, the sensory threshold significantly decreased after biofeedback therapy. Clinical improvements were maintained during the following 12 months. Biofeedback improves objective and subjective parameters of anorectal function. Selection of patients and customization of the therapy program increased biofeedback efficiency for the treatment of fecal incontinence.

Fecal continence after rectocele repair: a prospective study.

Combined transvaginal/transanal rectocele repair was performed in series of 89 consecutive women (mean age 55, range 35-81 years) with obstructed defecation due to a rectocele with a depth of more than 3 cm. The impact of this procedure on anal sphincter pressure and continence status was evaluated prospectively. Anorectal manometry was carried out before and after surgery (at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months). The following measurements were performed: maximal anal resting pressure (MARP), maximal anal squeeze pressure (MASP), and rectal sensory perception including first initial sensation, urge to defecate, and maximum tolerable volumes (MTV). The outcome was successful in 71% of patients with respect to symptoms such as the need for straining at defecation, manual assistance, feelings of incomplete evacuation, sense of rectal fullness, constipation, abdominal pain, and the use of laxatives. However, after rectocele repair seven patients experienced deterioration in fecal continence, and dyspareunia developed in 41% of the sexually active patients. Manometric studies revealed a significant decline in mean of 18% of MARP and 16% of MASP. In contrast to MASP, MARP gradually improved during the follow-up period. Distending volumes required for initial sensation and urge to defecate did not change after the procedure. MTV values were significantly lower 3 and 6 months after rectocele repair than those before and 24 months after surgery. MARP and MASP values after surgery did not differ between patients with impaired and those with normal continence. In conclusion, transvaginal/transanal rectocele repair is beneficial for patients with obstructed defecation; however, care should be taken in sexually active patients, and patients at risk of developing fecal incontinence.