Combined Androgen Blockade Research Articles

Androgen Receptor Signaling Inhibitor Withdrawal Syndrome After Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

Androgen-deprivation therapy is an extremely effective treatment for progressive prostate cancer. Previously, the first-line treatment for progressive prostate cancer was combined androgen blockade (CAB). If the disease progressed to castration-resistant prostate cancer, the administration of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) was recommended. When elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels are seen during CAB treatment, it is important to suspect antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome (AWS), discontinue CAB, and monitor the changes in the serum PSA levels. If a reduction in the patient's PSA levels is subsequently observed, antiandrogens should be discontinued and the patient should be followed, but if their PSA level rises they should be transitioned to ARSI treatment. Recently, there have been reports of withdrawal syndrome (WS) after ARSI treatment. With the increased use of ARSIs, such as abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, apalutamide, and dalorutamide, it is necessary to consider ARSI WS when a patient's serum PSA level increases during ARSI treatment. Unnecessary treatment can be avoided if the confirmation of ARSI WS is prioritized. Conversely, if it is not confirmed there is a risk that second-line treatment will be delayed. This is a review of recent studies of ARSI WS. It also discusses future prospects in this field.

Effect of deep testosterone reduction on the prognosis of metastatic prostate cancer with high-volume disease

ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate the correlation between serum testosterone levels after one month of treatment and prognosis in patients with high-volume disease metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa) who are undergoing combined androgen blockade therapy (CAB).MethodsThe clinical data of 199 patients with high-volume disease mPCa, diagnosed through biopsy pathology and imaging, were retrospectively analyzed from January 2010 to October 2022 in the Department of Urology at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University. Among these patients, 111 cases had a deep reduction in serum testosterone (< 0.7 nmol/l) after one month of treatment, while 88 cases did not achieve a deep reduction (≥ 0.7 nmol/l). The study utilized the Kaplan–Meier method to plot survival curves and employed the multifactor COX regression model to analyze independent risk factors. The risk factors with a significance level of P < 0.05 in the multivariate analysis were included in the nomogram prediction model. The accuracy of the model was assessed using the ROC curve and the calibration curve, while the net benefit for patients was evaluated through the decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultsThe group that achieved deep testosterone reduction(DTR) had a higher proportion of PSA < 0.2 ng/ml and a greater PSA decline rate after six months of treatment (P < 0.05). The group that achieved DTR and the group that did not achieve DTR had a progression to castration resistant prostate cancer(CRPC) time of 17.93 ± 6.68 months and 13.43 ± 6.12 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival time for the 2 groups were 18 months and 12 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The median overall survival times were 57 months and 32 months, respectively (P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival times were 18, 15, and 10 months for the group that achieved DTR within 1 month, the group that achieved DTR beyond 1 month but within 1 year, and the group that did not achieve DTR within 1 year, respectively (P < 0.001), and the median survival times were 57, 45, and 26 months, respectively (P < 0.001). COX multivariate analysis revealed that a testosterone level of ≥ 0.7 nmol/l at 1 month of treatment is an independent risk factor for the progression to CRPC and prognosis in patients with high-volume disease mPCa (P < 0.05). The risk of death in patients with a testosterone level of ≥ 0.7 nmol/l at 1 month of treatment was 2.087 times higher than that of patients with a level of < 0.7 nmol/l (P < 0.05). A nomogram prediction model was developed using independent risk factors, with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for progression-free survival (PFS) at 12, 15, 18, and 21 months being 0.788, 0.772, 0.760, and 0.739, respectively. For 3 and 5 years, the AUCs for overall survival (OS) were 0.691 and 0.624. The calibration curve demonstrated good consistency between the model’s predicted values and the actual outcomes.ConclusionPatients with high-volume disease mPCa who receive CAB treatment may experience extended progression-free survival and overall survival if their serum testosterone levels are below 0.7 nmol/l after one month of treatment. The longer it takes to achieve DTR, the worse the patient’s prognosis may be. The nomogram prediction model developed in this study demonstrates good predictive ability in assessing the progression and prognosis of high-volume disease mPCa.

A retrospective study of prognostic factors and prostate-specific antigen dynamics in Japanese patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer who received combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide.

This retrospective observational study explored the therapeutic potential of combined androgen blockade (CAB) with bicalutamide (Bic-CAB) as an initial treatment for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in Japan. The electronic health records of 159 patients with mHSPC from three Japanese institutions who received initial treatment with Bic-CAB between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed. The time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression, duration of Bic-CAB treatment, and overall survival (OS), with various definitions for PSA progression, were assessed. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was constructed using clinical parameters to predict time to the end of Bic-CAB treatment and OS. The median observation period was 46.4months, and the median age of patients at diagnosis was 71years. A total of 46.5% patients experienced PSA progression with a median survival duration of 29months (according to Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 criteria), and 49.1% patients achieved a PSA nadir < 0.2ng/mL in a median time of 4.7months. When stratified by PSA nadir and PSA change, patients at low risk for disease progression with a small PSA change due to low initial PSA had a 5-year OS of 100% and a 10-year OS of 75%. The OS during the observation period was 72.9months. These findings highlight the potential effect of Bic-CAB in patients with mHSPC who were at low risk for disease progression. Initial treatment with Bic-CAB and adjusting treatment early based on PSA dynamics may be a reasonable treatment plan for these patients.

Extra-Skeletal Osteosarcoma of the Prostate After Treated Prostatic Acinar Adenocarcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Extra-skeletal osteosarcoma is a rare form of malignant soft tissue sarcoma. Its occurrence in the prostate gland is particularly uncommon. In this case report, we present a patient diagnosed with osteosarcoma arising within the prostatic gland. A 58-year-old man was initially diagnosed with Gleason 8 prostate acinar adenocarcinoma following a transurethral resection (TUR) of the prostate. This diagnosis was accompanied by locoregional involvement and multiple bone metastases. The patient underwent a treatment regimen including complete androgen blockade, chemotherapy, greenlight laser prostate vaporization, and palliative radiotherapy. After treatment, he achieved a complete biochemical response, and his bone metastases remained stable. However, at 16 months post-diagnosis, clinical follow-up by means of radiological examinations revealed an increase in the size of the prostatic lesion, along with additional infiltration of the tumor into the rectum and bladder walls. Remarkably, a mesenchymal tumor proliferation with intratumor calcifications was observed. A subsequent TUR biopsy of the prostate showed a malignant tumor spindle and ovoid cell proliferation with high-grade nuclear atypia, necrosis, and islets of osteoid formation, leading to a final diagnosis of high-grade prostatic extra-skeletal osteosarcoma. Despite undergoing chemotherapy, the patient's condition progressed with the development of pulmonary and liver metastases, culminating in his demise.

A randomized phase II trial on the addition of dutasteride to combined androgen blockade therapy versus combined androgen blockade therapy alone in patients with advanced or metastatic salivary duct carcinoma – the DUCT study protocol

BackgroundSalivary duct carcinoma (SDC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of salivary gland cancer, frequently associated with incurable recurrences and distant metastases (R/M). Proliferation of SDC relies on androgen receptor (AR) signalling, prompting the use of combined androgen blockade (CAB, i.e., luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist and/or AR antagonists) to R/M SDC patients. However, only a subset of patients benefits from such treatments. We have shown that response to CAB is associated with steroid 5α-reductase 1 (SRD5A1) mRNA expression. SRD5A1 catalyses the intracellular conversion of testosterone into the more potent AR-agonist dihydrotestosterone. This conversion can be inhibited by dutasteride, a potent SRD5A1-inhibitor, which is currently prescribed for benign prostatic hyperplasia. We hypothesize that repurposing dutasteride to target AR signalling in SDC could enhance therapeutic response and clinical outcome in SDC patients.MethodsThis prospective, open-label, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial, is designed to investigate whether dutasteride as an adjunct drug to CAB improves response rate and clinical outcome in patients with AR-positive R/M SDC. Patients are divided in two cohorts based on their prior systemic treatments. In cohort A, CAB-naïve patients (n = 74) will be randomly assigned to either a control arm (Arm 1) receiving CAB (goserelin 10.8 mg/3m and bicalutamide 50 mg/OD) or an experimental arm (Arm 2) where dutasteride (0.5 mg/OD) is added to the CAB regimen. In cohort B, patients with disease progression after adjuvant or first-line palliative CAB therapy (max. n = 24) will receive goserelin, bicalutamide, and dutasteride to assess whether the addition of dutasteride can overcome therapy resistance. The primary endpoints are the objective response rate and duration of response. Secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit rate, quality of life, and safety. Translational research will be performed to explore molecular target expression differences and their correlation with clinical outcome.DiscussionThe DUCT study addresses an unmet medical need by investigating the repurposing of dutasteride to enhance treatment response and improve clinical outcome for patients with R/M SDC, especially those with limited alternative treatment options, such as HER2-negative cases. By repurposing a registered low-cost drug, this trial’s findings could be readily applied into clinical practice.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT05513365. Date of registration: August 24, 2022.Protocol versionCurrent protocol version 4.0, February 21, 2024.

Effectiveness of surgical castration by bilateral subcapsular orchiectomy as monotherapy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in men and the second cause of death due to cancer [1]. Treatment of prostate cancer has been a field of many progresses, but the discovery of the role of androgen in the genesis of prostate cancer by Hugins and Hodges is really a milestone in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer [2]. In patients with advanced prostate cancer, options for androgen ablation include bilateral orchiectomy, therapy with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues and antagonists, and combined androgen blockade (typically a LHRH analogue plus a first-generation anti-androgen). Although orchiectomy remains the historical gold standard for androgen ablation, LHRH therapy is considered to be equivalent therapeutically. Medical castration has the advantage to induce less psychological effects comparatively to the surgery, reason why in developed countries patients are managed with medical therapy [3]. However, LHRH agonists cannot induce a complete castration levels of testosterone in some patients [4]. Instead, surgical castration can completely eliminate remaining testosterone produced by the Leydig cells in testes [5]. According to the latest recommendations of the European Association of Urology (EAU), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the firstline indication in patients with advanced and metastatic PCa [6]. This first line is made of LHRH agonists, surgical castration representing the second line [7] And Several techniques of surgical castration have been described with comparable results in terms of patient survival and quality of life, but the sub-capsular technique of preserving testicular albuginea and epididymis is the most commonly used [8]. The relatively high cost of chemical castration is a constraint in the therapeutic choice in developing countries [9]. Therefore, surgical castration is an interesting alternative because of its simplicity and affordability in patients, most of whom have no health insurance. In Togo, most patients diagnosed with prostate cancer are at the metastasis stage, and surgical castration is often used as first-line treatment [10]. The aim of this study was to assess the biological and clinical effectiveness of surgical castration as the sole treatment in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Changes in the treatment landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A multicenter study.

118 Background: A multicenter database was utilized to examine the current treatment landscape and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) following approval of upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with mHSPC who commenced treatment between February 2018 and June 2023. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess oncological outcomes, including time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2, duration from initial treatment to tumor progression during second-line treatment), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of treatment choices on oncological outcomes. In addition, the incidence rate of adverse events was assessed. Results: In total, 829 patients were analyzed; 42.5% received ARSIs with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), 44.0% received combined androgen blockade (CAB), and 13.5% received ADT alone. Analysis of annual treatment choice trends revealed an increasing preference for ARSIs with ADT. Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated higher rates of CRPC and shorter PFS2 in patients treated with CAB versus ARSIs with ADT. By contrast, CSS and OS were not significantly different between the ARSI with ADT group and the CAB group. Grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients receiving CAB and 6.0% of those receiving ARSIs with ADT. Conclusions: For patients with mHSPC, initial treatment with ARSIs in combination with ADT resulted in a longer time to CRPC and longer PFS2 compared to CAB. Although CAB and ADT alone were associated with fewer adverse events, ARSIs with ADT should be considered a first-line treatment option given its superior oncological outcomes.

Changes in the treatment landscape of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer following approval of upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors: A multicenter study.

A multicenter database was utilized to examine the current treatment landscape and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) following approval of upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs). We retrospectively analyzed patients with mHSPC who commenced treatment between February 2018 and June 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess oncological outcomes, including time to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2, duration from initial treatment to tumor progression during second-line treatment), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of treatment choices on oncological outcomes. In addition, the incidence rate of adverse events was assessed. In total, 829 patients were analyzed; 42.5% received ARSIs with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), 44.0% received combined androgen blockade (CAB), and 13.5% received ADT alone. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression analyses indicated higher rates of CRPC and shorter PFS2 in patients treated with CAB versus ARSIs with ADT. By contrast, CSS and OS were not significantly different between the ARSI with ADT group and the CAB group. Grades 3-4 adverse events occurred in 1.9% of patients receiving CAB and 6.0% of those receiving ARSIs with ADT. Initial treatment with ARSIs in combination with ADT resulted in a longer time to CRPC and longer PFS2 compared to CAB. Although CAB and ADT alone were associated with fewer adverse events, ARSIs with ADT should be considered a first-line treatment option given its superior oncological outcomes.

Comparison of oncological outcomes of upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and combined androgen blockade in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer.

In recent years, randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that upfront androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) prolong overall survival (OS) compared with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or combined androgen blockade (CAB) in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). However, it remains unclear whether upfront ARSI is superior to CAB in Asian populations, among which the efficacy of ADT/CAB is considered relatively high. In this study, we compared the oncological outcomes of upfront ARSI and CAB in Japanese patients with mCSPC. Patients with mCSPC who underwent systemic therapy between May 2009 and October 2023 were enrolled retrospectively. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to compare the castration-resistant prostate cancer-free survival (CRPC-FS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and OS between patients treated with upfront ARSI (ARSI group) and those treated with CAB (CAB group). In total, 30 and 142 patients were enrolled in the ARSI and CAB groups, respectively. After PSM (25 patients in each group), CRPC-FS was significantly longer in the ARSI group than in the CAB group (median: 36.7 vs. 12.3 months, hazard ratio: 0.44, 95% confidence interval: 0.20-0.97, p = 0.035). No significant differences were observed in CSS or OS between the two groups. In conclusion, when compared to CAB, upfront ARSI might have the potential to extend CRPC-FS among individuals in the Japanese population.

A Case of Metastatic Prostate Cancer with Neuroendocrine Differentiation with Long-Term Survival after Multidisciplinary Therapy

A 74-year-old man visited the urology clinic with the chief complaint of urinary retention in December 2014. Serum level of initial prostate specific antigen (PSA) was 50 ng/ml and he was diagnosed with Gleason Score 4＋4 prostate adenocarcinoma with regional lymphadenopathy (cT3aN1M0). PSA level had declined after the treatment with combined androgen blockade. In November 2018, he was diagnosed with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) as local progression was detected by computed tomography (CT) while PSA level did not increase. Since local symptoms worsened, resulting in repeated hematuria after the treatment with enzalutamide, palliative radiation therapy to the prostate (45 Gy) was performed. Five months later, follow-up CT showed multiple metastasis in bilateral lung and left testicle. Serum level of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) was 24.4 ng/ml without an elevated in serum PSA level. He received rebiopsy of the prostate, but no malignant findings were observed. Consequently, bilateral orchiectomy was performed for diagnosis of left testicular tumor. Pathological examination revealed metastasis of neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Chemotherapy using cisplatin and irinotecan was administered after orchiectomy. Complete response of lung lesions was achieved and serum level of NSE decreased within normal range. No recurrence has been confirmed for 4 years after the completion of chemotherapy.

Maximal androgen blockade therapy (MAB) for prostate cancer (PC) and risk of bone fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Maximal androgen blockade therapy (MAB) for prostate cancer (PC) and risk of bone fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

EORTC 2238 "De-Escalate": a pragmatic trial to revisit intermittent androgen deprivation therapy in the era of new androgen receptor pathway inhibitors.

The landscape of treating metastatic prostate cancer has evolved with the addition of Androgen Receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPI) to Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), significantly improving survival rates. However, prolonged use of these therapies introduces notable side effects, prompting a need to revisit intermittent treatment duration. The EORTC 2238 De-Escalate trial is a pragmatic trial seeking to reassess the role of intermittent therapy in patients undergoing maximal androgen blockade (MAB) for metastatic hormone naïve prostate cancer (mHNPC), i.e., the combination of ADT with an ARPI, with the aims of reducing side effects, enhancing Quality of Life (QoL) and optimizing resource usage, while maintaining oncological benefits.

Hormonal Therapy and Radiation Therapy in Prostate Cancer: 5-Year Outcomes From a Trial Evaluating Combined Androgen Blockade With 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors as an Alternative to Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonists

BackgroundWe previously reported that for men undergoing combined androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy (RT) for prostate cancer, substitution of LHRH-agonists with 5-α- reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) led to improved preservation of 6-month hormonal quality of life (hQOL). With longer term follow-up, we evaluated disease control. MethodsIn this non-randomized trial, men with unfavorable intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer, aged ≥70 years or with Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2, were treated with RT (78-79.2 Gy in 39-44 fractions) and either oral ADT (oADT; 5-ARI with antiandrogen) or standard of care ADT (SOC; leuprolide with antiandrogen) for up to 28 months. The primary endpoint was EPIC hQOL; secondary endpoints included biochemical control and survival as well as changes in cholesterol and hemoglobin levels. ResultsBetween 2011 and 2018, 70 men were enrolled (40 in oADT; 30 in SOC). Median follow-up was 65 months [IQR 36-94]. Five-year freedom from biochemical failure for oADT and SOC was 89% versus 86%, disease free survival was 62% versus 69%, cancer-specific survival was 100% versus 96%, and overall survival was 70% versus 81% (all P>.1). Testosterone (2 mo through 3 yr) and hemoglobin levels (2 mo through 2 yr) were higher, and cholesterol levels (1 yr) were lower in the oADT groups (all P < .05). ConclusionsIn this non-randomized study, men treated with combined RT and oADT had better preservation of hQOL and comparable 5-year disease outcomes to men treated with SOC. Eugonadal testosterone with this approach may yield measurable benefits in cholesterol and hemoglobin levels.

Safety of Docetaxel in a Patient with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer After Kidney Transplantation: A Case Report

There are limitations in treating advanced prostate cancer (PC), especially castration-resistant (CR) cases, in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). We describe the case of RTR with metastatic CRPC (mCRPC) treated with docetaxel. A 60-year-old man with end-stage renal disease due to autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) underwent living-related kidney transplantation. A year later, he was diagnosed with PC (prostate-specific antigen level: 998 ng/mL). Prostate biopsy revealed prostatic adenocarcinoma with a Gleason score of 4 + 4 = 8. Radiographic examination revealed seminal vesicle invasion and multiple bone and lymph node metastases. Combined androgen blockade therapy was initiated; however, the patient was diagnosed with CRPC 6 months later. Triweekly docetaxel therapy was administered 28 months after diagnosis. The patient successfully completed 7 cycles of this therapy without major adverse events. However, after the 7th cycle, he developed a high fever caused by an infection of ADPKD-associated renal cysts. Therefore, docetaxel was discontinued, and enzalutamide was started, followed by abiraterone, but without any effect. We then introduced cabazitaxel but discontinued it because of hepatic dysfunction. Hence, the patient underwent a docetaxel rechallenge. He was administered the PEGylated form of the recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for neutropenia prophylaxis. After 6 cycles of rechallenge docetaxel therapy, the patient accidentally fell, resulting in a cervical spine fracture and subsequent death due to respiratory failure. Docetaxel can be safely delivered to patients with CRPC after renal transplantation who are taking oral immunosuppressants. It can be a good treatment option for them.

Determination of enzalutamide long-term safety and efficacy for castration-resistant prostate cancer patients after combined anti-androgen blockade followed by alternative anti-androgen therapy: a multicenter prospective DELC study.

Alternative anti-androgen therapy has been widely used as a first-line treatment for castration-resistant prostate cancer, and it may affect treatment outcome of subsequent agents targeting the androgen receptor axis. We conducted the prospective observational DELC (Determination of Enzalutamide Long-term safety and efficacy for Castration-resistant prostate cancer patients after combined anti-androgen blockade followed by alternative anti-androgen therapy) study to evaluate the efficacy of enzalutamide in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent prior combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide and then alternative anti-androgen therapy with flutamide. The DELC study enrolled 163 Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent alternative anti-androgen therapy with flutamide following failure of initial combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide in multiple institutions between January 2016 and March 2019. Primary endpoint was overall survival. Administration of enzalutamide was started at 160mg orally once daily in all patients. The rate of decline of prostate-specific antigen by 50% or more was 72.2%, and median overall survival was 42.05months. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher pretreatment serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (≥11.3ng/mL; P=0.004), neuron-specific enolase (P=0.014) and interleukin-6 (≥2.15pg/mL; P=0.004) were independent risk factors for overall survival. Fatigue (30.0%), constipation (19.6%) and appetite loss (17.8%) were the most common clinically relevant adverse events. The enzalutamide dose was not reduced in any patient under the age of 70, but adherence was decreased in those over 70. In the DELC study, the safety of enzalutamide was comparable to that in previous reports. Serum levels of neuron-specific enolase and interleukin-6 were suggested as prognostic factors for castration-resistant prostate cancer with potential clinical utility.

Optimal sequential therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after androgen receptor pathway inhibitors in the up-front era.

168 Background: The optimal sequential therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following the use of up-front androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs) for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) is still unclear. Methods: A total of 220 patients who received systemic therapy for de novo mHSPC at Nagoya University Hospital and its affiliated institutions between 2014 and 2022 were included in the study. Patients who received up-front therapy with ARPI as first-line therapy for mHSPC, followed by ARPI as primary therapy for mCRPC were defined as the AA group, followed by docetaxel (DOC) as primary therapy for mCRPC were defined as the AD group. On the other hand, the vAA group was defined as patients who received androgen deprivation therapy alone or combined androgen blockade as “vintage” first-line therapy for mHSPC, followed by two consecutive ARPIs as sequential therapy for mCRPC, and the vAD group was defined as patients who received ARPI followed by DOC as sequential therapy for mCRPC. Patient characteristics and progression-free survival (PFS) of the second agent after the first ARPI were compared in each group. Results: We identified 14 patients in the AA group, 16 in the AD group, 84 in the vAA group, and 59 in the vAD group. There were no differences in patient background such as initial PSA, Gleason score, and metastatic burden between the groups, while patient age was lower in the AD and vAD groups compared to the AA and vAA groups. The PFS of the second agent in the AA group was significantly shorter than that in the vAA group (median, 6.8 vs. 1.9 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.25-0.87; p=0.017). In contrast, there was no significant difference in PFS of the second agent in the vAD and AD groups (median, 7.0 vs. 4.0 months; HR, 0.63; 95%CI, 0.29-1.34; p=0.235). Conclusions: The effect of each agent after ARPI therapy in the UP-FRONT era may be poorer than that in the VINTAGE era. In the setting after up-front ARPI, sequential therapy with DOC may be more appropriate than sequential therapy with ARPI.

GnRH antagonist monotherapy versus a GnRH agonist plus bicalutamide for advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer; KYUCOG-1401.

To compare the effectiveness and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist monotherapy to combined androgen blockade (CAB) with a GnRH agonist and bicalutamide in patients with advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC). The study was conducted as KYUCOG-1401 trial (UMIN000014243) and enrolled 200 patients who were randomly assigned to either group A (GnRH antagonist monotherapy followed by the addition of bicalutamide) or group B (CAB by a GnRH agonist and bicalutamide). The primary endpoint was PSA progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints were the time to CAB treatment failure, radiographic progression-free survival, overall survival, changes in serum parameters, including PSA, hormones, and bone and lipid metabolic markers, and adverse events. PSA progression-free survival was significantly longer in group B (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.40, 1.01-1.95, p = 0.041). The time to CAB treatment failure was slightly longer in group A (HR, 95% CI; 0.80, 0.59-1.08, p = 0.146). No significant differences were observed in radiographic progression-free survival or overall survival. The percentage of patients with serum testosterone that did not reach the castration level was higher at 60 weeks (p = 0.046) in group A. No significant differences were noted in the serum levels of bone metabolic or lipid markers between the two groups. An injection site reaction was more frequent in group A. The present results support the potential of CAB using a GnRH agonist and bicalutamide as a more effective treatment for advanced HSPC than GnRH antagonist monotherapy.

Significant reduction in burden of metastatic disease by intermittent docetaxel therapy in a patient with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Intermittent docetaxel therapy (IDT) is rarely used nowadays as a treatment option for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) because of the widespread availability of androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy, which is less toxic. Therefore, there is limited information available on whether IDT has a clinical benefit in the treatment of men with mCRPC. This report describes the case of a 66-year-old man with a diagnosis of cT2N1M0 prostate cancer who underwent neoadjuvant combined androgen blockade and whole-pelvis radiation therapy. However, the tumor had progressed to mCRPC with metastasis to the bladder and a left pelvic lymph node within 2years. Docetaxel had been administered as first-line chemotherapy, and the patient achieved a complete response in terms of the bladder metastasis. Docetaxel was stopped after 15 cycles. When a durable response had been maintained for more than 2years, during which only androgen deprivation therapy was administered, the patient was switched to observation only. However, his prostate-specific antigen level gradually increased. Abiraterone was started as second-line therapy, during which there was a rapid increase in the PSA level. Computed tomography revealed further enlargement of the left pelvic lymph node, bladder metastasis, metastasis to the left common iliac lymph nodes, and several disseminated nodules around the bladder. Docetaxel was reintroduced as IDT for third-line therapy, and a complete response was achieved for all metastases, with the exception of the metastasis in the left pelvic lymph node. Thus far, the patient has survived for more than 7years after starting docetaxel as first-line therapy for mCRPC. IDT is potentially useful in a subgroup of patients with mCRPC and could achieve long-term survival. Comprehensive genomic profiling may help physicians to select patients with mCRPC who are more likely to benefit from docetaxel than other systemic therapy.

Management and health-related quality of life among patients with prostate cancer in a Kenyan tertiary health facility

Introduction Advances made in the screening, diagnosis and management of prostate cancer have improved the survival rates of the patients. However, many of these treatments including surgery, radiotherapy, and pharmacotherapy, have an impact on the subsequent health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of these patients. Since it is an important prognostic factor of survival, failure to evaluate the HRQoL and its predictors in these patients typically results in long-term deficits in their overall well-being, that is, their physical, social, emotional, and mental health. The objective of this study was to evaluate the management and HRQoL among patients with prostate cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital. Methods This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The sample size of 62 patients who met the eligibility criteria was selected through simple random sampling on the respective clinic days of the cancer treatment centre and urology clinic. Data was collected through a pre-tested structured questionnaire and HRQoL tools which are EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-PR25 and analysed using STATA version 13 software. Descriptive analysis was used to summarise the continuous and categorical variables. Spearman's rho (rs) correlation was used to determine the predictors of HRQoL based on the strength and significance of association at 0.05 level of significance. Results The mean age of the participants was 70.5 (±7.35) years. The majority (52, 83.9%) of the patients had a prostate specific antigen (PSA) above 20 ng/ml. Twenty-one (33.9%) were graded as Gleason group 5 and 41 (66.1%) had stage IV disease at diagnosis. Fifty (80.9%) participants were on hormonal therapy, with most of them being on combined androgen blockade. The overall HRQoL was 65.1. Fatigue, one of the major complaints among these patients, was negatively associated with physical functioning (p = 0.0005), role functioning (p = 0.0026), social functioning (p = 0.0001), financial difficulties (p = 0.0077) and quality of life (p = 0.0050). Conclusion Fatigue was the most common predictor of poor HRQoL in several scales of measurement. For those on management, frequent assessment of HRQoL should be carried out and interventions instituted immediately.

Docetaxel in hormone-sensitive advanced prostate cancer; GENESIS-SEFH evaluation reporta

Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common urogenital malignancy in older men and the second leading cause of death by cancer in men in Europe. Current therapeutic practice considers Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) as first line treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer at high-risk, either locally advanced or metastatic. ADT can be achieved through orchiectomy (surgical castration), luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists, or through complete androgen blockade (LHRH agonist combined with an anti-androgen). Docetaxel in combination with prednisone or prednisolone is indicated for the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. The CHAARTED and STAMPEDE clinical trials studied the effect of bringing forward the use of docetaxel added on to ADT in the context of hormone-sensitive patients. The CHAARTED clinical trial showed a significant increase in a variable with maximum relevance such as Overall Survival (OS), with a difference of 13.6 months between medians. There was also clinical benefit in the secondary variables: median time until castration-resistant disease or until clinical progression. In the STAMPEDE clinical trial, which included 39% of non-metastatic patients, a 10-month difference between medians was demonstrated in OS, and 17 months in the primary co-variable of Progression Free Survival. The most frequent adverse events were: neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, leucopenia, and general disorders such as asthenia, lethargy or fever. According to data from the CHAARTED and STAMPEDE studies, and the incremental cost of € 3 196.98 for adding on docetaxel to standard treatment, the estimated additional cost for each year of life gained is compatible with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between € 2 26736 and € 3 851.78. In view of the efficacy and safety results, the proposed positioning is: to advance the use of docetaxel added to androgen deprivation therapy to first-line metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, regardless of metastatic volume, in those patients who meet the CHAARTED study criteria.