Maxillary Esthetic Zone Research Articles

Does Injectable Platelet-Rich Fibrin Combined With Autogenous Demineralized Dentine Enhance Alveolar Ridge Preservation? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The present trial evaluated the first-time application of autogenous demineralized dentin graft with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (ADDG + i-PRF) versus autogenous demineralized dentin graft (ADDG), in alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Twenty-two maxillary (n = 22) non-molar teeth indicated for extraction were randomized into two groups (n = 11/group). Extracted teeth were prepared into ADDG, implanted into extraction sockets with or without i-PRF amalgamation and covered by collagen sponge. Cone-beam computed tomography scans at baseline and 6 months were compared to assess ridge-dimensional changes. Keratinized tissue width, patient satisfaction, pain score and chair time were recorded. In the course of dental implant placements at 6 months, bone core biopsies of engrafted sites were obtained and analysed histomorphometrically. Reduction in ridge width was 1.71 ± 1.08 and 1.8 ± 1.35 mm, while reduction in ridge height was 1.11 ± 0.76 and 1.8 ± 0.96 mm for ADDG + i-PRF and ADDG, respectively (p > 0.05). Significant differences in keratinized tissue width reduction were notable between ADDG + i-PRF and ADDG (0.12 ± 0.34 and 0.58 ± 0.34 mm respectively; p = 0.008). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in ADDG + i-PRF (p = 0.012). All patients in the two groups were satisfied with no differences in chair time (p > 0.05). No differences in total percentage area of newly formed bone, soft tissue or graft particles were observed between the groups (p > 0.05). ADDG alone or in combination with i-PRF yields similar results regarding ARP clinically, quality of the formed osseous tissues, as well as patients' satisfaction. Yet, the addition of i-PRF to ADDG tends to preserve the keratinized tissue and lessen postoperative pain.

Effect of Orthodontic Forced Eruption for Implant Site Development in Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review of Clinical Data

Effect of Orthodontic Forced Eruption for Implant Site Development in Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Systematic Review of Clinical Data

IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT AND LOADING IN THE MAXILLARY ESTHETIC ZONE DEMONSTRATE HIGH SURVIVAL RATES, BUT ESTHETIC AND FUNCTIONAL SUCCESS DATA IS STILL NEEDED

IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT AND LOADING IN THE MAXILLARY ESTHETIC ZONE DEMONSTRATE HIGH SURVIVAL RATES, BUT ESTHETIC AND FUNCTIONAL SUCCESS DATA IS STILL NEEDED

Two-Step Periosteal Releasing Incision for Tension-Free Flap Closure After Implant Placement With Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration.

We evaluated the effect of periosteal-releasing incisions on flap displacement in anterior maxillary sites following implant placement and simultaneously guided bone regeneration. Thirty patients, each requiring a single dental implant and guided bone regeneration in the maxillary esthetic zone, were recruited. After full-thickness flap elevation, the displacement of the flap was measured under a standardized tension of 1 Ncm. Then, a 2-step periosteal releasing incision was placed in the internal aspect of the flap, and the displacement was remeasured using the same standardized tension. Keratinized tissue width and mucosal thickness at the surgical site were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed at the 7- and 14-day recall visits. Flap displacement (primary outcome) was calculated before and after periosteal-releasing incisions. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the influence of mucosal thickness on flap displacement and adjusted for Keratinized tissue width. Primary wound closure was achieved in all patients. The mean difference in flap coronal displacement before and after the periosteal-releasing incisions was 8.2 mm (p < .0001). Adjusted regression models showed no association between mucosal thickness and keratinized tissue width with the amount of flap displacement (p = .770). Patient-reported outcome measures for pain, swelling, and bleeding amounted to 1.28 ± 1.93, 1.36 ± 1.87, and 0.0 ± 0.0 at 7 days and 0.11 ± 0.57, 0.56 ± 1.03, and 0.0 ± 0.0 at 14 days, respectively. Periosteal-releasing incisions using the 2-step procedure described here are a predictable technique to obtain coronal flap displacements >8 mm without increased surgical complications.

Socket Preservation Using Platelet-Rich Fibrin and Free Gingival Grafts

The present randomised controlled trial is based on the null hypothesis that there is no difference in crestal bone levels (CBLs) following socket preservation (SP) using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and free gingival graft (FGG). The aim was to evaluate CBLs following SP using PRF and FGG. This study is a parallel-arm randomised controlled trial. Patients in the test and control groups underwent SP using PRF and FGG, respectively. Intraoral visual examination was performed to clinically assess signs of swelling, pus/abscess, and stability of sutures and graft. Self-rated postoperative pain was assessed after 1 week and 6 months using the visual analogue scale (VAS). At the 6-month follow-up, cone-beam computed tomography was performed to evaluate CBL in mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions. The preoperative cone-beam computed tomographic images were superimposed with those taken at the 6-month follow-up to compare CBLs. Statistical comparisons were performed and level of significance was set at P < .05. The test and control groups each comprised 13 individuals with comparable ages. All teeth included in the test and control groups were located in the maxillary aesthetic zone. At the 1-week follow-up, VAS scores were higher in the control than in the test group (P < .01). At the 6-month follow-up, none of the participants reported self-rated pain. The change in buccolingual dimension was greater in the control group than in the test group (P < .05). Both FGG and PRF are effective techniques for SP; however, the latter technique is more effcacious in maintaining buccolingual dimensions of the extraction socket.

Validation of the pink esthetic score/white esthetic score at single tooth-supported prostheses in the esthetic zone: A randomized clinical trial.

To validate the reproducibility and inter/intra-observer variability of the Pink Esthetic Score/White Esthetic Score (PES/WES) of single tooth-supported prostheses in the maxillary esthetic zone (13-23). Forty-five patients were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment options (15 patients per group) receiving each one a different crown type: Porcelain fused to metal (PFM), monolithic zirconia, and lithium disilicate. Eight observers from each of four different specialties (Prosthodontists, Orthodontists, Periodontists, and Oral Surgeons) were recruited and assessed twice and four weeks apart (i.e., T1 and T2) 45 photographs of the single tooth-supported prosthesis using PES/WES and compared them with contralateral teeth. According to the ANOVA and post hoc tests, the zirconia crown type obtained the highest mean score by all observers, with a mean value of 16.70 ± 2.94. The prosthodontists and oral surgeons assigned the lowest mean score to PFM crowns, 13.03 ± 3.47 and 13.80 ± 3.17, respectively. Notably, the prosthodontists awarded the highest scores, specifically 17.50 ± 2.81 for the zirconia crowns. Intraobserver agreement was calculated utilizing the paired t-test. Pairwise comparisons between observers of different specialties revealed significant intraobserver agreement. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) scores were statistically significant among four specialties. No difference was detected concerning the interobserver agreement. The PES/WES index remains consistent across various observers from different specializations, yielding uniform results in the overall esthetic evaluation. Consequently, in light of the presented preliminary positive results, its use might also be considered for the esthetic assessment of single-tooth-supported prostheses. The PES/WES index may be employed clinically to evaluate single tooth-supported prostheses as it emerged as a reproducible esthetic scoring system.

Immediate implant placement in the anterior mandible: a cone beam computed tomography study

BackgroundThe placement of implants into the alveolar socket right after tooth extraction is called immediate implant placement (IIP). This approach has its particularities depending on which region of the jaws is involved. The anterior mandible region is peculiar due to the presence of mandibular incisors, which have the shortest roots among all permanent teeth.PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the factors that could be associated with the risk of either cortical bone wall perforation or invasion of the 2 mm secure distance from the surrounding anatomical structures (defined as unsafe implant placement), with IIP in the maxillary aesthetic zone, in a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) virtual study.Materials and methodsCBCT exams from 239 eligible subjects were investigated. Implants were virtually placed in two distinct positions: prosthetically-driven (along the long axis of the existing tooth) and bone-driven position (according to the available bone and with regard to nearby anatomical structures). Correlation between several variables was tested, and binary logistic regression analysis in order to assess of the possible associations between covariates and unsafe placement was performed.ResultsSafe placing implants was significantly higher for the bone-driven in comparison to the prosthetically-driven position (22.2% vs. 3.3%, respectively), and the 2-mm secure distance from anatomical structures was not possible to respect in the majority of cases (77.6% vs. 82.9%, respectively). Covariates associated with a higher risk of unsafe placement were tooth region (CI in relation to IL and CA), decrease of labial concavity angle (LCA), decrease of mandible basal bone height (MBBH), and decrease in mandibular bone thickness at the tooth apex level (MBT0).ConclusionThe possibility of safely placing immediate implants in the anterior mandible is significantly higher for bone-driven than in prosthetically driven position. Presurgical virtual planning with CBCT is a great tool for minimizing the risk of implant unsafe placement with regards to the anatomical conditions in the mandible.

Immediate implant placement with immediate or delayed provisionalization in the maxillary aesthetic zone: A 10-year randomized trial.

To compare the marginal bone level of immediately placed implants, with either immediate or delayed provisionalization (IP or DP), in the maxillary aesthetic zone after 10 years of function. Participants with a failing tooth in the maxillary aesthetic zone were randomly assigned to immediate implant placement with either IP (n = 20) or DP (n = 20) after primary wound closure with a free gingival graft. The final restoration was placed 3 months after provisionalization. The primary outcome was change in marginal bone level. In addition, implant survival, restoration survival and success, peri-implant tissue health, mucosa levels, aesthetic indices, buccal bone thickness and patient satisfaction were evaluated. After 10 years, the mean mesial and distal changes in marginal bone level were -0.47 ± 0.45 mm and -0.49 ± 0.52 mm in the IP group and -0.58 ± 0.76 mm and -0.41 ± 0.72 mm in the DP group (p = .61; p = .71). The survival rate was 100% for the implants; for the restorations, it was 88.9% in the IP group and 87.5% in the DP group. Restoration success, according to modified USPHS criteria, was 77.8% in the IP group and 75.0% in the DP group. The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis was 38.9% and 35.7% and of peri-implantitis 0.0% and 6.3%, respectively, in the IP group and DP group (p = 1.0; p = .40). The Pink Esthetic Score and White Esthetic Score was 15.28 ± 2.32 in the IP group and 14.64 ± 2.74 in the DP group, both clinically acceptable (p = .48). The buccal bone thickness was lower in the DP group. Patient satisfaction was similar in both groups (p = .75). The mean marginal bone level changes after immediate implant placement with IP were similar to those after immediate placement with DP. Registered in the National Trial Register (NL9340).

Does the sagittal root position of maxillary anterior teeth affect the decision making on immediate implants in the anterior maxilla? A CBCT-based study.

Immediate implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone is a challenging and demanding task. To achieve favorable results, proper case selection and treatment planning are necessary. Variables like the sagittal root position (SRP) and the labial bone thickness (LBT) of maxillary anterior teeth are of paramount importance for predictable outcomes. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the SRP and LBT of maxillary anterior teeth in the context of immediate implant placement by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in a sample of the Pakistani population. A cross-sectional study was conducted using the CBCT scans of patients. The SRP of each tooth (maxillary canine to canine) was evaluated in the sagittal section of a CBCT scan according to the classification by Kan et al. The LBT of each tooth was measured perpendicularly to the long axis of tooth at 3 sites: at the alveolar crest (P1); 2 mm from the alveolar crest (P2); and 4 mm from the alveolar crest (P3). Descriptive statistics were reported for SRP and LBT. The χ2 test was employed to assess any association between the variables. Class I SRP was the most prevalent (n = 196, 81.7%), while Class III was the least frequent (n = 1, 0.4%). The association between the tooth type and SRP was statistically non-significant (p = 0.510). In the evaluated sample of the Pakistani population, the most frequent type of the SRP of maxillary anterior teeth was Class I, which is most favorable for immediate implant placement. Furthermore, the labial bone in the maxillary esthetic zone was found to be mostly thin - LBT was within the range of 0.5-0.9 mm - which makes immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla a challenge. The results of the present study could serve as a guide for clinicians in terms of appropriate patient selection for immediate implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone.

Volumetric Analysis After Modified Pedicle Roll Flap in Soft Tissue Ridge Augmentation in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone

Volumetric Analysis After Modified Pedicle Roll Flap in Soft Tissue Ridge Augmentation in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone

Assessment of the Nasopalatine Canal in Patients Requiring Dental Implants in the Maxillary Anterior Region Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

To assess the nasopalatine canal in patients requiring dental implants in the maxillary anterior region using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). About 56 patients requiring dental implants in the maxillary anterior region of either gender reporting to the daily Outpatient Department, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology aged between 18 and 60 years were selected. They were subjected to a CBCT scan using Newtom Giano CBCT machine (NewTom, Imola, Italy). Newtom New Technologysoftware and a slice thickness of 0.3 mm were used. For assessment of the implant site at the maxillary anterior region, alveolar bone width in the anterior region of the canal at the upper, middle, and lower third, incisive foramen diameter (IFD), nasopalatine canal length (NPCL), canal diameter in the floor of the nasal fossa and nasopalatine canal morphology was determined. Out of 56 patients, males comprised 30 and females 26. The mean bone height in 11 regions was 15.6±3.9, in 12, 16.2±2.7 mm, in 13 was 15.5±2.4 mm, in 21 was 13.7±4.2 mm, in 22 was 14.7±3.6 mm, in 23 was 16.7±1.5 mm. A non-significant difference was observed when comparing the bone height at different implant sites (p>0.05). The mean bone width at 3 mm and 6 mm from an alveolar crest in 11 regions was 4.3 mm and 5.3 mm, in 12 was 5.7 mm and 6.2 mm, in 13 was 3.7 mm and 4.6 mm, in 21 regions was 4.1 mm and 5.5 mm, in 22 regions was 4.6 mm and 5.7 mm and in 23 regions was 4.0 mm and 4.9 mm, respectively. A significant difference was observed when comparing the bone width at 3 mm and 6 mm at different implant sites (p<0.05).Nasopalatine canal type was A in 42 (75%), B in 13 (23.2%), and C in 1 (1.8%) patient. The mean alveolar bone width in the anterior region of the canal at the upper third was 10.1 mm, in the middle third was 7.4 mm, and in the lower third was 5.2 mm. The mean IFD was 4.6 mm, the NPCL was 13.5 mm, and the canal diameter on the floor of the nasal fossawas 3.8 mm. A significant difference was observed in comparing nasopalatine canal type (p<0.05). For the clinician to assess implant placement in the maxillary esthetic zone, CBCT imaging of the nasopalatine canal is crucial. It is possible to prevent intraoperative and postoperative complications such as hemorrhage, sensory impairment, osseointegration failure, and nasopalatine duct cyst formation.

Conversion of the anatomic crown of a natural tooth to an interim-retained restoration for enhanced esthetics and soft tissue stability in the maxillary esthetic zone: A clinical report.

Immediate non-functional loading of an implant in the anterior region is a documented treatment modality with high success rates. This therapeutic approach is frequently used to overcome esthetic and functional problems during the provisionalization period, but also because it provides better support of the peri-implant soft tissues. For that purpose, an implant-supported resin restoration, either traditionally or digitally made, is used. This clinical report describes the modification of patient's natural tooth, that was previously fractured, used as an implant-supported provisional restoration to obtain better esthetics and preservation of the soft tissues in their original, pre-extraction, position.

Long-term evaluation of combined prosthetic-surgical approach and soft tissue augmentation in the esthetic zone.

There is no standard protocol for immediate implant placement and subsequent loading in the smile zone. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of simultaneous implant placement, soft tissue grafting, and immediate prosthetic loading in the esthetic zone. Thirty-five implants were placed in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Twenty-two patients were evaluated using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and White Esthetic Score (WES). Also, the degree of peri-implant bone resorption and patient survey were applied for the esthetic and functional outcomes. The esthetic and harmonizing outcomes were achieved according to the mean total PES/WES value (17.9±2.0). The mean overall PES was 8.5±1.66. The papilla level had the highest mean score (1.8±0.36). Furthermore, the combination of root convexity/color and soft tissue color and texture was one of the key values in evaluating the effectiveness of this method (the mean value was 1.5±0.5). The mesial and distal papillae were 1.6±0.5 and 1.8±0.4, respectively. None of the 35 implants reached below 6 points (which is considered an esthetically unsatisfactory result). The mean WES score was 9.5±0.57. The average degree of total peri-implant bone resorption was 1.05±0.3 mm after 12 months. According to the questionnaire, all the patients smiled without hesitation and were satisfied with the treatment (100%). This study showed that restoring one or more teeth in the smile zone using the concept of one-stage implant placement, soft tissue flap augmentation, and loading with provisional crowns was an esthetically successful and predictable method.

Pilot Study: Periosteal Mattress Sutures as an Alternative to Pins and Screws in Guided Bone Regeneration in the Esthetic Zone.

To quantify the buccal bone thickness, area, and perimeter following guided bone regeneration (GBR) using stabilizing periosteal sutures. The loss in hard tissue volume may impair proper implant placement. GBR has been used to regenerate the lost alveolar ridge prior to or at the same time as dental implant placement. The most important factor for GBR success is graft stability. The periosteal mattress suture (PMS) stabilizing technique is an alternative to pins and screws to stabilize bone grafting material and has the advantage of not requiring the removal of the fixing devices. A CBCT was acquired before and 6 months after surgery from six patients who underwent GBR with the PMS stabilizing technique. Images were analyzed for buccal bone thickness, area, and perimeter. The mean change in buccal bone thickness was 3.42 mm (± 1.31 SD) and proved statistically significant (P = .005). The mean change in bone crest area also proved statistically significant (P = .001). No significant difference was found in bone perimeter (P = .12). The PMS technique delivered optimal results without clinical complications. This study shows the potential of this technique as an alternative to pins or screws for graft stabilization in the esthetic zone.

Immediate implant placement in fresh extraction sites in the maxillary esthetic zone: a case series with 2-years' follow-up.

The objective of the present case series with 24 months of follow-up was to document the clinicoradiographic status of IDI placed in fresh extraction sockets (FES) in the maxillary esthetic zone (MEZ). Immediate implants were placed in the FES of three adult patients. Medical history and demographics of these patients were retrieved from their respective healthcare records. All extractions were done using atraumatic techniques and performed in the MEZ. Diameter and lengths of IDI ranged between 4-4.1 mm and 14-16 mm, respectively. Osseous drilling was done at 2000 rpm and implants were inserted using an insertion torque of 45 Ncm. All implants were restored with screw-retained ceramic restorations. Follow-up clinicoradiographic investigations were done after 2-years. At follow-up, peri-implant plaque and gingival indices were measured and peri-implant probing depth was measured. Marginal bone loss was also measured. The two-year follow-up clinical and radiographic results from all cases showed that the implant success and survival rates were 100% and 100%, respectively. There was no clinical evidence of peri-implant soft tissue inflammation in all cases. Scores of peri-implant plaque index, bleeding on probing, probing depth and crestal bone loss showed no evidence of peri-implant inflammation at 2-years' follow-up. All implants and their prostheses were clinically stable. It is concluded that IDI can osseointegrate and remain functionally and esthetically stable when placed in FES located in the MEZ.

Hard tissue stability outside the buccal bone arch contour after guided bone regeneration in the anterior maxilla: A retrospective cohort radiographic study.

To radiographically evaluate the stability of the bone substitute augmented outside the buccal bony arch contour in the maxillary esthetic zone. Patients who missed a single anterior tooth and received simultaneous GBR in implant surgery were included. The contralateral homonymous area of the implant site was horizontally mirrored as the individual bone arch contour. According to the relative position of the postoperative buccal grafts and bone arch contour at the implant shoulder, 62 patients were allocated into the outside-contour (OC) and inside-contour (IC) groups. Cone-beam computed tomography was performed before surgery, after implant insertion, before re-entry surgery, and at follow-up. The profilometric changes of the buccal bone plate were analyzed via the bone distance to the mirrored bony contour. At the implant shoulder, the bone distance in the OC group was higher than that in the IC group, with statistically significant differences at re-entry surgery and follow-up. However, the bone grafts outside the bone arch contour were reduced into the contour after remodeling and showed more bone resorption than the IC group. At other vertical levels below the implant shoulder, bony grafting of overcontour 1-2 mm range was favorable to regenerate stable bone plates reaching the individual contour at follow-up. The overaugmented bone outside the buccal bone arch contour tended to remodel into the original contour, which indicates that the anterior bone arch contour is worthy of careful observation for deciding buccolingual implant position and bone augmentation width.

Selection criteria for immediate implant placement and immediate loading for single tooth replacement in the maxillary esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to review available evidence for Type 1A (immediate implant placement and immediate loading) of single tooth replacement in the maxillary esthetic zone. An electronic search was conducted utilizing the databases of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane to identify publications reporting on the outcomes of Type 1A for single tooth replacement in the maxillary esthetic zone. The success and survival rates of the included articles were reported, which were further categorized according to the clinical criteria reported in Type 1A. Mean survival rates were univariately compared between risk groups and additionally between studies published before and since 2012 using bias-corrected and study size-weighed bootstrap tests. A study time-correcting meta-analysis was then performed to obtain an overall effect for the study pool. A total of 3118 publications were identified in the search, with a total of 68 articles included. A mean number of implants per study were 37.2 and mean follow-up was 2.8 years. All the included studies utilizing Type 1A report highly selective inclusion and exclusion criteria. Univariate risk group comparison determined that studies before 2012 report a significantly lower mean survival rate (difference of -1.9 percentage points [PP], 95% CI: [-0.3, -4.0], p = .02), facial gap dimension had an impact on survival rates (+3.1 PP [0.2, 5.3] for width >2 mm, p = .04), as well as presence of endodontic infection (+2.6 PP [0.9, 5.1], p = .004). Type 1A has a high survival rate in studies reporting strict patient and site selection criteria. Further research is required to assess esthetic and functional success with Type 1A treatments.

Clinical performance of immediately placed and immediately loaded single implants in the esthetic zone: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to assess the following PIO question: In adult patients treated with an indication for single tooth extraction in the maxillary esthetic zone (15-25), what is the influence of an immediate implant placement and immediate loading protocol on the clinical performance (primary aim) and esthetic outcomes (secondary aim) focusing on investigations published after 2010. An electronic search in Medline (PubMed), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE databases up to April 2022 was performed to identify clinical studies investigating the outcome of single implants subjected to immediate placement with immediate restoration/loading (Type 1A). Sixty-three studies (10 randomized controlled trials, 28 prospective and 25 retrospective cohort studies) were included with a follow-up ranging from 12 to 96 months. One thousand nine hundred sixty-one implants reported survival rates of 99.2 (98.6-99.5) % at 1 year, 97.5 (95.9-98.4) % after 3 years, and 95.8 (93.3-97.4) % after 5 years; 1064 immediately loaded restorations presented survival rates of 98.9 (97.8-99.5) % after 1 year, 96.8 (93.6-98.4) % after 2 years, and 94.8 (89.6-97.4) % after 5 years. Comparing baseline to 12-month data using the Hedges' g effect size (95% CI), papilla height presented an overall effect size of -0.71 (-1.25, -0.1) mm, midfacial recession change of -0.15 (-0.66, 0.36) mm, and a 0.82 (0.37, 1.28) gain in PES. Immediate implant placement and immediate loading can be considered a predictable and safe treatment option for single maxillary anterior restorations with adequate survival rates and favorable esthetics outcomes for up to 5 years.

Effect of three different grafting materials on immediate implant placement using vestibular socket therapy in class II extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone: a randomized controlled clinical trial

BackgroundThis study compared the effectiveness of three bone grafting materials used for treating class II fresh extraction sockets in the esthetic zone with immediate implant placement using Vestibular Socket Therapy (VST) to evaluate the pink esthetic score (PES), peri-implant mucosal levels (PML), and facial bone thickness (FBT).MethodsTwenty-four surgical sites in the maxillary anterior region presented with type II socket defects received immediate implants and simultaneous bone grafting with either a collagen plug soaked in blood, demineralized bone matrix Grafton, or a particulate mixture of 2/3 autogenous bone chips and 1/3 deproteinized bovine bone mineral MinerOss X. The outcome measures were evaluated at 6 and 12 months. The study was registered on www.clinicaltrial.gov (12/07/2021 - ID: NCT04957654).ResultsTwenty-two cases (91.6%) showed a total PES score of > 10, without a significant difference between all groups. The vertical height soft tissue changes showed significant improvement in the Collagen plug and Grafton groups at 6 and 12 months, while MinerOss X showed no significant difference at 6 and 12 months compared to baseline. Radiographically, FBT was 0.72 ± 0.20, 0.44 ± 0.12, and 0.95 ± 0.37 at baseline, which significantly increased to 1.61 ± 0.88, 1.48 ± 1.20 and 2.31 ± 0.86 at 12 months for all three groups, respectively.ConclusionThe use of a particulate bone graft mixture significantly increases the FBT compared to collagen plugs and DBM-Grafton when performing VST during immediate implant placement in compromised Class II extraction sockets.

Rehabilitation of missing maxillary incisors with two implants and guided bone regeneration

Achieving esthetically satisfactory results after the replacement of missing maxillary incisors is a challenging task that requires meticulous planning on the part of dentists The main aesthetic objectives of an implant-supported prosthesis, from a surgical point of view, are the achievement of a harmonious gingival margin, the maintenance of intact papillae, and the preservation or delineation of a convex contour of the alveolar crest. GBR involves the application of a membrane to exclude non‐osteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration that may impede the osseointegration process.The present report describes a case of rehabilitation of missing anterior teeth in the maxillary esthetic zone by means of dental implants using GBR to aid in augmenting the deficient buccal bone.