Background: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate, using conventional radiographic imaging, the height, angulation, and mesiodistal position of impacted maxillary canines to determine if these variables are significantly associated with the palatal or buccal positioning of the tooth. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients diagnosed and treated for at least one impacted maxillary canine over a 4-year period in the Principality of Asturias. The final sample included 159 impacted canines. The variables analyzed were age, gender, associated pathology, location, angulation, height, mesiodistal position, buccopalatal position, and treatment method. Follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 50 months. Results: The mean age of the patients was 21 years (range 10–41 years), with most cases occurring in patients aged 14 to 30 years. Females accounted for 66.1% of the sample, with a female-to-male ratio of 1.95:1. The type of treatment (extraction/traction, surgical–orthodontic approach) was significantly associated with patient age. Additionally, the proximity of the impacted canine crown to the palatal or buccal cortices was significantly related to the treatment choice. However, no significant relationship was observed between the palatal/buccal position of the canine crown and its height or angulation. Conclusions: In the present work, the upper canines included by the palatal did not have a greater height or angulation than the canines included by the vestibule.
Read full abstract