Following the recognition by Dobzhansky of the importance of sexual isolation in speciation, especially in the genus Drosophila, a number of experiments have been made on mating discrimination between races of various Drosophila species: willistoni (Dobzhansky and Mayr, 1944), sturtevanti (Dobzhansky, 1944) and prosaltans (Dobzhansky and Streisinger, 1944) and between the species pseudoobscura and persimilis and their hybrid (Mayr, 1946a). Tan (1946) has made a similar study of the effects of mutants in pseudoobscura. A brief account of the technique is necessary here. Equal numbers of two strains of females are enclosed with males of one of these strains. After a lapse of time sufficient to produce about 50% insemination the distribution of inseminated females between the two strains is observed. The percentage of intra-strain minus the percentage of inter-strain matings, divided by their sum, is the isolation index. If all are intra-strain the index is 1. If all are inter-strain the index is -1. If both strains are equally inseminated the index is zero. Since one strain of males is enclosed with two strains of females it is tempting to assume that the results are determined by discrimination on the part of the males. Both the direct (Mayr, 1946b) and indirect (Bateman, 1948) evidence is quite contrary to this assumption. Virtually conclusive was Streisinger's experiment (1948). Etherization of females, by inhibiting any discrimination on their part, enabled interspecific which were otherwise impossible to take place freely. It is justifiable to suppose that the determining factor in choice is the degree to which the two strains of female repel the same males. It is unfortunate, in view of the role of the females in determining sexual isolation, that in experiments of the choice type it is always the males rather than the females which have been offered the choice. The technical difficulties confronting the female choice are great. If they could be overcome, however, they might be more sensitive than the usually used. The repulsion exercised by the females will be the result of two sets of factors. The first, which is strictly concerned with sexual isolation, will depend on the ability of females to perceive whether the male is of their own or another strain and the degree to which they are capable of repelling males which they recognize as foreign. The second is concerned with the non-specific mating propensity of the females (what might be called their heat). Mayr (1946 a and b) has proposed that the more active the female the more likely she is to be courted. This does seem to apply when one compares females of the species D. pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. On the other hand, if a female is trying to avoid mating, the more active she is the more successful she will be. The situation is probably a complex one. The relative mating propensity of females of different strains introduces a complication to the study of sexual isolation which it may mask or-exaggerate, sometimes even producing negative isolation indices, which are inexplicable by the theory of sexual isolation. It is possible, however, to separate the effects of sexual isolation from those of mating propensity by the use of the isolation indices from complementary matings. Complementary matings is here used of the pairs of of the types (A + B) X A ee and (A + B)
Read full abstract