Mastoscopic Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Research Articles

Feasibility analysis of treating breast cancer patients with breast-conserving surgery via a periareolar incision combined with non-lipolytic suspension-type mastoscopy

The purpose is to analyze and compare postoperative recovery and complication incidence between a periareolar incision combined with Suspension-type Mastoscopic Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (SMALND) and traditional inflated Mastoscopic Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (MALND). This was a randomized trial conducted from June 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022, in the Department of Second Breast Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, and the Department of Thyroid and Breast Surgery, Zibo Central Hospital, in accordance with the criteria of inclusion and exclusion. Overall, 126 patients diagnosed and treated for early-stage breast cancer were selected to undergo periareolar-incision breast-conserving surgery. Those patients who underwent periareolar-incision surgery combined with SMALND formed the observation group (SMALND Group), while those who underwent periareolar-incision surgery combined with traditional inflation became MALND Group. In the two groups, paired data “t” was used to examine, analyze, and compare the postoperative daily drainage volume and drain removal time, while paired data “χ2” was used to examine, analyze, and compare the incidences of postoperative upper limb edema and paresthesia. There were 64 cases in the SMALND Group and 62 cases in the MALND Group. Between the two clusters, no differences were found in age, clinical staging, BMI, and breast cancer classification (P > 0.05). The intraoperative surgery time of the SMALND Group was 43.37 ± 6.27 min while that of the MALND Group was longer: 45.72 ± 4.25 min (P < 0.05). The intraoperative hemorrhage volume of the SMALND Group was 88.33 ± 16.79 ml, less than that of the MALND Group: 96.76 ± 26.85 ml (P < 0.05). The postoperative axillary mean daily drainage volume of the SMALND Group was 38.17 ± 5.55 ml, less than that of the MALND Group: 40.72 ± 7.25 ml (P < 0.05). The drain removal time of the SMALND Group was 7.50 ± 1.60, less than that of the MALND Group: 9.00 ± 1.80 (P < 0.05). The upper limb edema incidence rate of the SMALND Group was 3.12% (2/64) and had no obvious difference from the MALND Group, which was 4.83% (3/62) (P = 0.62). The paresthesia incidence rate of the SMALND Group was 18.75% (12/64), while that of the MALND Group was 17.7% (11/62), without an obvious difference (P = 0.88). For axillary lymph node dissection, the use of non-lipolytic suspension-type mastoscopy has reduced the intraoperative hemorrhage volume of patients, shortened surgery time and postoperative recovery time, saved treatment expenses for patients, and avoided complications such as hypercapnia and subcutaneous emphysema caused by traditional inflated mastoscopic surgery. Moreover, it has not increased the incidence of postoperative upper limb edema and paresthesia, supporting its safety and effectiveness.

17-Year Follow-up of Comparing Mastoscopic and Conventional Axillary Dissection in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Longer follow-up was necessary to determine the exact value of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND). From January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2005, 1027 patients with breast cancer were randomly assigned to two groups: MALND and CALND (conventional axillary lymph node dissection); 996 eligible patients were enrolled. The final cohort of 996 patients was followed for an average of 198months. Events other than death differed significantly between the two cohorts (p = 0.0311; 46.3% in MALND and 53.2% in CALND, respectively). The sum of events other than death and deaths from other causes was much higher in the CALND (59.6%) than MALND (53.4%) group (p = 0.0494). The 17-year disease-free survival DFS rates were 36.7% for the MALND and 33.6% for the CALND group, respectively. There was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.0306). Overall survival (OS) rates were 53.2% after MALND and 46.0% after CALND (p = 0.0119). MALND patients had much less axillary pain (p = 0.0000), numbness or paresthesia (p = 0.0000), arm mobility (p = 0.0000) and arm swelling on the operated side (p = 0.0000). Aesthetic appearance of the axilla was much better in the MALND than CALND group (p = 0.0000) at an average follow-up of 17 years. The use of MALND in breast cancer surgery not only decreases the relapse and arm complications but also improves long-term survival of patients. Therefore, MALND should be one of the preferred approaches for breast cancer surgery when ALND is needed. The comparison of long-term outcomes of mastoscopic and conventional axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer: a multicenter randomized control trial. ChiCTR-TRC-11001477, CHiCTR. First registration 08/14/2011.

Efficacy and prognosis of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis

Efficacy and prognosis of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis

A challenging therapeutic method for breast cancer: Non-lipolytic endoscopic axillary surgery through periareolar incisions.

Surgical treatment of breast cancer is becoming increasingly precise, less invasive, and more cosmetically pleasing. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remain the standard treatment methods for breast cancer. However, these methods still require incisions in the breasts or axilla. Mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND) surgery, although first reported several years ago, has not been widely used as it involves lipolysis. Non-lipolytic mastoscopy may be more appealing; however, the lack of a cavity in the breast and the abundant fat and glands make this procedure challenging. In addition, incision of the trocar in the axilla has been shown to have no advantage over traditional breast-conserving surgery. The present study describes 16 cases of non-lipolytic endoscopic axillary surgery without incisions in the axilla.

Comparison of Mastoscopic and Conventional Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Breast Cancer: Long-term Results From a Randomized, Multicenter Trial

ObjectiveTo compare the long-term results of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND) and conventional axillary lymph node dissection (CALND). Patients and MethodsFrom January 1, 2003, through December 31, 2005, a group of 1027 consecutive patients with operable breast cancer were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 study groups: MALND and CALND. The median follow-up was 63 months. The primary end points of the study were operative outcomes, complication reduction, function conservation, and cosmetics. The secondary end points were disease-free and overall survival. ResultsThe mean operative blood loss in the MALND group was less than in the CALND group (P<.001). The patients who underwent MALND had less axillary pain, numbness or paresthesias, and arm swelling (P<.001). The aesthetic appearance of the axilla in the MALND group was much better than that in the CALND group (P=.001 at 6 months and P=.002 at 24 months). A significant difference was found between the 2 groups in distant metastasis (P=.04). The disease-free survival rate was 64.5% in the MALND group and 60.8% in the CALND group (P=.88). The overall survival rate was 81.7% in the MALND group and 78.6% in the CALND group (P=.95). ConclusionCompared with CALND, MALND has advantages in operative outcomes, complication reduction, function conservation, and cosmetics.

The application of entirely mastoscopic axiliary lymph node dissection in grass-root hospitals

Objective To explore the feasibility and clinical efficacy of entirely mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection for patients with breast cancer. Methods To analyze the clinical data and the procedure of the Breast cancer cases with entirely mastescopic axillary lymph node dissection. Results All the operations of those cases re-ceived entirely mastoseopic axillary lymph nodes dissection were successful, the average operating duration was 97min,and average of 5 ～ 14 lymph nodes were removed;2 cases had the positive lymph node. The procedure of those operations went well ,and there was no operation complication. After the operation the shoulder mobilization had unlim-ited, and no cancer cell was transplanted in operations holes. Conclusion Entirely mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection can be carried out in grass-root hospitals and can be taken as one of the usual operation methods. Key words: Breast neoplasms; Axillary lymph node dissection; Endoscopy

Experience of a large series of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection

Minimally invasive and functional therapy represents an inevitable trend in breast surgery. Improved visualization during mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND) realizes a clear exposure of axillary anatomy, but it differs from a general laparoscopic operation. There are some challenges in technique itself which need to be noted. Detailed understanding of the elaborate operative technique, familiarity with the axillary anatomy and accurate adherence to procedure are main elements for successful MALND. Based on our experience of MALND, we have identified several points that are essential in ensuring successful MALND. Five hundred twenty-two patients underwent MALND. The special instruments, axillary anatomic landmarks and operative steps were illuminated. Mean operative time was 39.2 min (range 20-156 min). Operative bleeding was minimal. A mean of 13.4 (range 4-38) lymph nodes were harvested. No intra or post-operation-related complication occurred. No axillary tumor relapse or trocar tumor implantation was identified during follow-up. MALND can be performed with great convenience and safety with adherence to suitable procedures.

A Standardized Surgical Technique for Mastoscopic Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

To standardize the surgical technique for mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection (MALND). Mastoscopic lymph node dissection was performed consistently by a group of surgeons in 316 cases of breast cancer. The mean operation time was 46.7 minutes with minimal bleeding, and the median number of lymph nodes dissected at each operation was 17.0. There were no operative complications in any case, nor did trocar implantation or tumor diffusion occurring during the mean follow-up time of 15.1 months. MALND is distinctive and practicable in operative anatomy as well as safe and convenient. The location of critical anatomy such as the intercostobrachial nerve, lateral thoracic artery, medial thoracic nerve, and thoracoepigastric vein should be clearly identified to avoid damage to them, so that is the great advantage of MALND.