Mastectomy Weight Research Articles

Clinical Outcomes Following Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

There is a lack of reliable evidence on the surgical outcomes of profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap breast reconstruction. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate its safety and compare it with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, aiming to offer more information on whether the PAP flap was an ideal alternative for autologous breast reconstruction. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve relevant articles. The postoperative complication rates following PAP reconstruction were pooled. Mean differences of patients' age, BMI, mastectomy weight and flap weight between PAP and DIEP group were calculated, and relative risk was estimated to compare their incidence of complications. Twenty-four articles reporting 1612 PAP flap breast reconstructions were included. The surgical success rate was 99.6%; the incidence of total and partial flap loss was 0.4% and 0.0%; the incidence of infection, hematoma, seroma, fat necrosis and wound dehiscence in recipient sites was 0.3%, 1.4%, 1.0%, 3.3% and 0.3%, respectively; the incidence of infection, hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence and sensory disturbance in donor sites was 2.0%, 0.9%, 3.5%, 9.2% and 0.6%, respectively. Compared to the DIEP group, the average age, BMI, mastectomy weight and final flap weight were significantly lower in the PAP group. No significant difference was observed in terms of flap failure, breast fat necrosis and donor site wound dehiscence. This systematic review demonstrates similar levels of postoperative morbidities for the PAP and DIEP flaps with some subtle differences and verifies the PAP flap as a second-line treatment for patients when the DIEP is unavailable or undesirable. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Management of the Infected Tissue Expander.

Tissue expander (TE) infection is a critical postoperative complication in two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). We assessed risk factors associated with TE infection and reconstructive loss and examined reconstructive salvage rates. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent IBBR with TE placement from 2017 to 2022. Included were patients with TE infection treated with admission and IV antibiotics, interventional radiology (IR) drainage, and/or operative management (washout with or without TE removal and TE replacement, TE removal and replacement with implant, and/or TE removal without replacement). Reconstructive success was defined as maintenance of breast reconstruction for 1 year after TE placement. Of 4,498 patients who underwent IBBR, 305 (338 TEs) met the inclusion criteria. Cox modeling showed higher body mass index, hypertension, radiation, bilateral TEs, acellular dermal matrix use, increasing mastectomy weight, and nipple sparing mastectomy were associated with increased hazard of TE infection. Patients with TE infection had a 54% reconstructive failure rate within 1 year; Cox modeling showed Black race and gram-negative cultures were associated with increased hazard of reconstructive failure within 1 year. Patients who underwent TE replacement with an implant had the most favorable success rate following infection. Overall, 46% of patients admitted with a periprosthetic infection had successful salvage. Patients with TE infection should be started on IV antibiotics with a low threshold for operative intervention based on exam and culture data. While IR can guide operative intervention of periprosthetic infections, our practice has shifted away from IR drainage towards definitive operative management.

Smooth Operator: Nanotextured Breast Tissue Expanders Are Associated with Lower Rates of Capsular Contracture

Background: Continuous research on breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) has introduced a focus on surface texturizations and a shift towards smooth breast devices, yet outcomes comparing the complication profiles of differently textured tissue expanders (TEs) remain conflicting. The study aim was to compare the complication profile of a new nanotextured and MRI-compatible TE to micro- and macrotextured TEs and to identify possible predictors for complications. Methods: A retrospective analysis of women undergoing expander-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy between January 2016 and March 2022 was conducted. The primary endpoint was the development of capsular contracture. Possible predictors were analyzed in a mixed-effects model using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Moreover, a comparison of complications and an evaluation of predictors were carried out. Results: A total of 147 breasts, encompassing 82 nanotextured, 43 microtextured and 22 macrotextured TEs, were analyzed. Breasts with nanotextured TEs were less likely to develop capsular contracture overall (OR, 0.12; 95%CI 0.05–0.28, p < 0.001). Post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) was identified as a predictor for capsular contracture (OR, 4.67; 95%CI 1.86–11.71, p < 0.001). Breasts with nanotextured TEs showed a higher rate of seroma, but lower rates of malposition and pain. Predictors for developing postoperative complications included higher mastectomy weight (p = 0.008). Conclusions: Breasts with nanotextured TEs exhibited the lowest rate of capsular contracture compared to micro- and macrotextured TEs. Together with its MRI-compatibility and improved oncologic follow-up, the nanotextured TE seems to be a favorable device for expander-based breast reconstruction.

Predicting Postoperative Satisfaction with Breasts: How Important is the Preoperative BREAST-Q Score?

The role that preoperative Satisfaction with Breast plays in a patient's postoperative course after postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) is not understood. The aim of this study is to understand the impact of the preoperative score on postoperative outcome as an independent variable. We examined patients who underwent PMBR between 2017 and 2021 and who completed the BREAST-Q Satisfaction with Breasts at 1year postoperatively. Two multiple linear regression models (Model 1 with the preoperative Satisfaction with Breasts score and Model 2 without the preoperative score), likelihood ratio tests, simple t-statistics, and sample patient dataset to predict the 1year score were performed. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing preoperative scores. Overall, 2324 patients were included. Model 1 showed that the preoperative score is significantly associated with the postoperative score (β = 0.09, 95% confidence interval 0.04-0.14; p < 0.001). Comparing Model 1 and Model 2 demonstrated that including preoperative Satisfaction with Breasts in a regression significantly improves model fit (test statistic = 10.04; p = 0.0021). Using the absolute value of the t-statistics as a measure of variable importance in linear regression, the importance of the preoperative score was quantified as 3.39-more important than neoadjuvant radiation, mastectomy weight, body mass index, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, and race, but less than adjuvant radiation, reconstruction type, and psychiatric diagnoses. Preoperative Satisfaction with Breasts scores are an important independent predictor of postoperative satisfaction after PMBR. Just as vital sign and work-up are carefully documented before surgery, preoperative scores should be collected to pre-emptively gauge patients' satisfaction and optimize postoperative outcomes.

Periareolar Skin-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction

Introduction Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) is often used when tumor location prohibits performing a nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). We examined a square excision of the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and an X-shaped purse string closure after implant-based reconstruction. Methods A retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing periareolar SSM and immediate implant-based reconstruction from January 2015 through December 2022, specifically identifying those patients who had square NAC excision and skin closure. Results Twenty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. They underwent 54 periareolar SSM and immediate implant-based reconstruction (bilateral 25, unilateral 4). Indications for surgery were cancer (30) and prophylactic (24; 2 patients had bilateral cancer). Reconstructive methods included tissue expander (TE) (36 [66.7%]) and direct-to-implant (DTI) (18 [33.3%]). The mean mastectomy weights and final implant sizes were similar between the 2 groups. Overall wound complications occurred in 13 (24.1%) of the breasts: mastectomy skin flap necrosis (MSFN; 10 [18.5%]) and infection (3 [5.6%]). Reconstructive failure occurred in 3 cases: TE, 1 (infection); DTI, 2 (MSFN/exposure). MSFN by reconstructive method: TE, 4 (11.1%); DTI, 6 (33.3%) (P = 0.05, comparing MSFN rates between TE and DTI methods). The mean initial TE fill volume was 247.1 cc; mean implant size in the DTI group was 417.8 cc (P &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions The square NAC excision and closure can minimize the surgical incision in implant reconstruction. Two-stage TE reconstruction permits lower initial fill volumes, which reduces the risk of MSFN after box to X closure of SSM and implant-based reconstruction. It is useful in small- to moderate-sized breasts with mild ptosis in patients who are not candidates for NSM.

Abstract PO2-22-12: Patient-reported outcomes 3 and 18 months after prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Results from the UK Pre-BRA multicentre prospective cohort study

Abstract Background: Prepectoral implant-based reconstruction (PPBR) with and without mesh is becoming the standard of care for prosthetic reconstruction in the UK. In addition to being easier and quicker to perform, the procedure is perceived to be associated with better patient-centred outcomes including decreased post-operative pain, avoidance of animation deformity and improved cosmesis. Evidence to support these benefits, however, is lacking. The UK PreBRA prospective multicentre cohort study (ISRCTN11898000) aimed to assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) before and 3 and 18 months following PPBR to provide much needed evidence to support the effectiveness of the technique. Methods: Women aged 18 or over undergoing mastectomy for breast cancer or risk-reduction who opted to have PPBR between July 2019 and December 2020 were eligible to participate in the study. Demographic, operative, oncology and three-month complication data were collected. Participants were asked to complete the validated BREAST-Q questionnaire at before surgery and at 3 and 18 months following the procedure. Questionnaires were scored according to the developers’ instructions and scores compared over time. Exploratory analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline scores was performed to explore factors impacting PROs following PPBR. Results: 347 women underwent PPBR at 40 centres across the UK. Of these, 334 (96.3%) completed PROMs at baseline with 237 (68.3%) completing at least two of the three main BREAST-Q scales at both 3 and 18 months. The median age of the cohort was 49 (range 23-74). Most women (n=291, 87.1%) had mastectomy for malignancy with a quarter (n=82, 24.6%) undergoing bilateral surgery. Approximately a fifth (n=68, 20.4%) had a body mass index &amp;gt;30 and 12% (n=40) were active smokers at the time of surgery. At 3 months, 68 (20.4%) had experienced a complication requiring readmission and/or re-operation and 27 (8.1%) experienced an implant loss. In the cohort overall, women undergoing PPBR reported slight increases in their ‘Satisfaction with Breasts’ scores from baseline to 3 months after surgery but by 18 months, their scores had fallen below baseline values (Table 1). ‘Physical well-being’ scores decreased from baseline to 3 months but then remained stable. No changes were seen in ‘Psychosocial well-being’ scores across the three timepoints. At 18 months, after adjusting for baseline BREAST Q scores, women having surgery for risk-reduction reported scores that were 10-16 points lower than those having surgery for malignancy across all four main domains for the BREAST-Q. This exceeded the minimum clinically meaningful difference and was highly statistically significant. Women with high mastectomy weights ( &amp;gt;600g) reported lower scores for ‘Physical’, ‘Psychosocial’ and ‘Sexual’ well-being but not ‘Satisfaction with Breasts’. Smoking adversely impacted ‘Psychosocial well-being’ and ‘Satisfaction with Breasts’ and women with BMI &amp;gt;30 reported lower ‘Physical well-being’ scores at 18 months. Having a major complication requiring readmission/re-operation did not affect BREAST-Q scores, but when considered separately, implant loss dramatically impacted all BREAST-Q domains Conclusions: Women having PPBR report short-term improvements in ‘Satisfaction with Breasts’ scores but these are not maintained over time and decrease to below baseline 18 months after surgery. ‘Physical well-being’ also decreased after PPBR despite no disruption to the pectoralis muscle. Women having surgery for risk-reduction reported the worse PROs. Further work is needed to establish the long-term patient-reported outcomes of PPBR and factors impacting these. Citation Format: Leigh Johnson, Kate Harvey, Parisa Sinai, Nicola Mills, Paul White, Chris Holcombe, Shelley Potter. Patient-reported outcomes 3 and 18 months after prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: Results from the UK Pre-BRA multicentre prospective cohort study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-22-12.

Analyzing mastectomy and reconstruction weight in immediate autologous breast reconstruction: A preliminary study.

This study aims to explore the ideal breast size by assessing the relationship between mastectomy to free flap weight ratio and complications as well as patient-reported outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction (ABR). A retrospective review of patients undergoing bilateral immediate ABR with mastectomy and flap weights available was completed. Patients were divided into three groups based on the ratio of mastectomy to flap weights. The patients were grouped as "maintained" if the flap weight was within 10% of the mastectomy weight. Patients with a weight difference greater than 10% were used to declare "downsized" or "upsized." Outcomes included complications and four domains of the BREAST-Q at 1-year postoperatively. Three hundred and fifty-ninepatients were included in the analysis, of which 112 were downsized, 91 maintained, and 156 upsized, respectively. Presence of complications did not significantly differ among the groups. At 1-year postoperatively, Sexual Well-being significantly differed (p = 0.033). Between preoperative and 1 year, patients who upsized experienced an improvement in Satisfaction with Breasts by 16 points (p < 0.001), while patients who downsized experienced a decline in Physical Well-being of the Chest by 7 points (p = 0.016). Multivariable linear regression model showed that Sexual Well-being was 13 points lower in the downsized cohort than in the maintained cohort (β = -13, 95% confidence interval: -21to -5.4; p = 0.001). Although complication rates do not significantly differ between the three cohorts, patients who downsize may have lower Sexual Well-being postoperatively. Surgeons should consider our preliminary findings to counsel patients preoperatively about the predicted breast size and the impact of downsizing on sexual health.

Evaluation of post-operative complications and adjuvant treatments following immediate prepectoral versus subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction without acellular dermal matrix

BackgroundIn immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), it is unclear whether there is any difference in the complication rates between prepectoral versus subpectoral implant placement without acellular dermal matrix (ADM). AimTo compare the rates of early post-operative complications and time to initiation of adjuvant treatment in patients undergoing IBR between prepectoral and subpectoral implant placement without ADM for the two surgical procedure. MethodsWe retrospectively retrieved data of patients who underwent IBR with prepectoral versus subpectoral implant placement between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022 in a large cancer center in France. ResultsWe included 192 patients: 119 in the prepectoral and 73 in the subpectoral group. Their clinical characteristics were similar. Thirty patients (15.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, among them 27 (14.1%) received it within 12 weeks, and there was no difference between the groups (p = 0.12). In the prepectoral group, 39 patients (32.8%) received adjuvant radiotherapy versus 5 (6.8%) in the subpectoral group (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in time to treatment commencement. Overall, 35 patients (29.4%) in the prepectoral group and 17 (23.3%) in the subpectoral group experienced post-operative complications (p = 0.44). Using multivariable analysis, the only factor associated with post-operative complications was determined to be mastectomy weight (odds ratio 1.98 (1.10–3.59) for weight ≥500 g; p = 0.02). ConclusionPrepectoral implant placement without ADM can be proposed to patients undergoing IBR with an indication for adjuvant treatment. However, in our study, the reoperation rate with this technique was slightly higher (p = 0.008). This is partly due to the learning curve for surgeons using this new technique.

Minimizing Nipple-Areolar Complex Complications in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.

Nipple-areolar complex (NAC) viability remains a significant concern following prepectoral tissue expander (TE) reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). This study assesses the impact of intraoperative TE fill on NAC necrosis and identifies strategies for mitigating this risk. A chart review of all consecutive, prepectoral TEs placed immediately after NSM was performed between March 2017 and December 2022 at a single center. Demographics, mastectomy weight, intraoperative TE fill, and complications were extracted for all patients. Partial NAC necrosis was defined as any thickness of skin loss including part of the NAC, whereas total NAC necrosis was defined as full-thickness skin loss involving the entirety of the NAC. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Forty-six patients (83 breasts) with an average follow-up of 22 months were included. Women were on average 46 years old, nonsmoker (98%), and nondiabetic (100%) and had a body mass index of 23 kg/m2. All reconstructions were performed immediately following prophylactic mastectomies in 49% and therapeutic mastectomies in 51% of cases. Three breasts (4%) were radiated, and 15 patients (33%) received chemotherapy. Mean mastectomy weight was 346 ± 274 g, median intraoperative TE fill was 150 ± 225 mL, and median final TE fill was 350 ± 170 mL. Partial NAC necrosis occurred in 7 breasts (8%), and there were zero instances of complete NAC necrosis. On univariate analysis, partial NAC necrosis was not associated with any patient demographic or operative characteristics, including intraoperative TE fill. In multivariable models controlling for age, body mass index, mastectomy weight, prior breast surgery, and intraoperative TE fill, partial NAC necrosis was associated with lower body mass index (odds ratio, 0.53; confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.98; P < 0.05) and higher mastectomy weight (odds ratio, 1.1; CI, 1.01-1.20; P < 0.05). Prior breast surgery approached significance, as those breasts had a 19.4 times higher odds of partial NAC necrosis (95% CI, 0.88-427.6; P = 0.06). Nipple-areolar complex necrosis following prepectoral TE reconstruction is a rare but serious complication. In this study of 83 breasts, 7 (8%) developed partial NAC necrosis, and all but one were able to be salvaged.

The Role of Density in Achieving Volume and Weight Symmetry in Breast Reconstruction.

Knowledge of tissue and implant density is crucial in obtaining both volume and weight symmetry in unilateral breast reconstruction. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine and compare the density of abdominal and breast tissue specimens as well as of 5th generation breast implants. Thirty-one breast tissue and 30 abdominal tissue specimens from 61 patients undergoing either mammaplasty or abdominoplasty as well as five different 5th generation breast implants were examined. Density (g/mL) was calculated by applying the water displacement method. The mean specimen density was 0.94 ± 0.02 g/mL for breast tissue and 0.94 ± 0.02 g/mL for abdominal tissue, showing no significant difference (p = 0.230). Breast tissue density significantly (p = 0.04) decreased with age, while abdominal tissue did not. A regression equation to calculate the density of breast tissue corrected for age (breast density [g/mL] = 0.975-0.0007 * age) is provided. Breast tissue density was not related to body mass index, past pregnancy, or a history of breastfeeding. The breast implants had a density ranging from 0.76 to 1.03 g/mL which differed significantly from breast tissue density (-0.19 g/mL [-19.8%] to +0.09 g/mL [+9.58%]; p ≤ 0.001). Our results support the suitability of abdominal-based perforator flaps in achieving both volume and weight symmetry in unilateral autologous breast reconstruction. Abdominal flap volume can be derived one-to-one from mastectomy weight. Further, given significant brand-dependent density differences, the potential to impose weight disbalances when performing unilateral implant-based reconstructions of large breasts should be considered.

Expanded Indications for Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 60 Years.

Although nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) have long been praised for excellent cosmetic results and the resultant psychosocial benefits, the feasibility and safety of these procedures in patients older than 60 years have yet to be demonstrated in a large population. Patients undergoing NSM with or without IBR at the MedStar Georgetown University Hospital between 1998 and 2017 were included. Patient demographics, surgical intervention, and complication and recurrence events were retrieved from electronic medical records. Primary outcomes were recurrence and complication rates by age groups older and younger than 60 years. There were 673 breasts from 397 patients; 58 (8.6%) older than 60 years and 615 (91.4%) younger than 60 years with mean follow-up of 5.43 (0.12) years. The mean age for those older than 60 was 63.9 (3.3) years, whereas that for those younger than 60 was 43.1 (7.9) years (P < 0.001). The older than 60 group had significantly higher prevalence of diabetes, rates of therapeutic (vs prophylactic) and unilateral (vs bilateral) NSM, and mastectomy weight. However, there were no significant differences by age group in complication rates or increased risk of locoregional or distant recurrence with age. Based on similar complication profiles in both age groups, we demonstrate safety and feasibility of both NSM and IBR in the aging population. Despite increased age and comorbidity status, appropriately selected older women were able to achieve similar outcomes to younger women undergoing NSM with or without IBR.

Early Complications in Prepectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Prepectoral implant placement for postmastectomy breast reconstruction has increased in recent years. Benefits of prepectoral reconstruction may include lack of animation deformities and reduced postoperative pain, but its complication profile is currently unclear. This study aimed to examine the complication profile of prepectoral tissue expanders (TEs) to determine factors associated with TE loss. A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent immediate prepectoral TE reconstruction from January 2018 to June 2021. The decision to use the prepectoral technique was based on mastectomy skin quality and patient comorbidities. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative details were evaluated. Outcomes of interest included TE loss, seroma, hematoma, infection/cellulitis, mastectomy skin flap necrosis requiring revision, and TE exposure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with TE loss. The study identified 1225 TEs. The most frequent complications were seroma (8.7%, n = 106), infection/cellulitis (8.2%, n = 101), and TE loss (4.2%, n = 51). Factors associated with TE loss in the univariate analysis included ethnicity, history of smoking, body mass index, mastectomy weight, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the multivariate regression analysis, only mastectomy weight had a positive association with TE loss (odds ratio, 1.001; p = 0.016). Prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction can be performed safely with an acceptable early complication profile. The study data suggest that increasing mastectomy weight is the most significant factor associated with TE loss. Further research examining the quality of the soft tissue envelope and assessing patient-reported outcomes would prove beneficial.

Prospective Sensory Outcomes for Targeted Nipple Areola Complex Reinnervation (TNR) in Gender-Affirming Double Incision Mastectomy with Free Nipple Grafting.

This study analyses the anatomy and sensory outcomes of targeted nipple areola complex reinnervation (TNR) in gender-affirming double incision mastectomy with free nipple grafting (FNG). TNR is a novel technique to preserve and reconstruct intercostal nerves (ICN) to improve postoperative sensation. There is little evidence on relevant anatomy and outcomes. 25 patients were prospectively enrolled. Data included demographics, surgical technique, and axon/fascicle counts. Quantitative sensory evaluation using monofilaments and qualitative patient reported questionnaires were completed preoperatively, and at one, three, six, nine and twelve months postoperatively. 50 mastectomies were performed. Per mastectomy, the median number of ICN found and used was 2 (1-5). Axon and fascicle counts were not significantly different between ICN branches ( P >0.05). BMI ≥30kg/m 2 and mastectomy weight ≥800g were associated with significantly worse preoperative sensation ( P <0.05). Compared to preoperative values, NAC sensation was worse at 1 month ( P <0.01), comparable at 3 months ( P >0.05), and significantly better at 12 months ( P <0.05) postoperatively. Chest sensation was comparable to the preoperative measurements at 1 and 3 months ( P >0.05), and significantly better at 12 months ( P <0.05) postoperatively. NAC sensation was significantly better when direct coaptation was performed compared to use of allograft only ( P <0.05), and with direct coaptation of ≥2 branches compared to direct coaptation of a single branch ( P <0.05). All patients reported return of nipple and chest sensation at one year postoperatively and 88% reported return of some degree of erogenous sensation. TNR allows for restoration of NAC and chest sensation within 3 months postoperatively. Use of multiple ICN branches and direct coaptation led to the best sensory outcomes.

Single versus Double Drainage for Immediate Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Reports evaluating plastic surgeons' practices indicate there are conflicting trends regarding the use of one or two drains for implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). Our study aimed to perform a matched cohort analysis to examine the postoperative outcomes and complications of immediate IBBR with tissue expander (TE) using two drains versus a single drain. A propensity score-matched analysis (nearest neighbor, 1:1 matching) of immediate reconstructions using two versus one drain was conducted. Female patients undergoing immediate two-stage IBBR with TEs between January 2011 and May 2021 were included. The covariables were as follows: BMI, mastectomy weight, lymph node surgery, TE surface, plane of reconstruction, use of acellular dermal matrix products, fluorescence imaging use, and intraoperative TE volume. After matching using propensity scores, 192 reconstructions were included in the final analysis: 96 in each group. The rate of 30-day complications and overall complications during the first phase of IBBR were comparable between groups. The time for drain removal, time to initiate and finalize expansions, and time for TE-to-implant exchange were comparable between groups. Diabetes (OR 3.74, p = 0.025) and an increased estimated blood loss (OR 1.004, p = 0.01) were the only independent predictors for seroma formation. In this matched cohort analysis evaluating the role of one versus two drains for two-stage IBBR, we found a comparable rate of complications and surgical outcomes between the two cohorts. Using two drains for immediate IBBR needs to be tailored depending on intraoperative findings. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Revisiting Breast Reduction Insurance Coverage: How the Schnur Scale Discriminates against Women Based on Body Habitus.

The Schnur scale used body surface area (BSA) to determine the amount of breast tissue resection in reduction mammaplasty, resulting in a greater requirement of breast weight removal in patients with larger BSA. The authors aimed to demonstrate BSA variance among women with similar mastectomy weights and the range of mastectomy weights among women with comparable BSAs. A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent mastectomy from October of 2021 to June of 2022 was performed. Patients were included if they underwent skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy with a minimum specimen weight of 700 g. Patient's BSA, body mass index (BMI), mastectomy weight, and Schnur weight requirement (SWR) were collected. A total of 130 patients (194 breasts) were included. There was significant variance in mean BSA, BMI, SWR, and SWR-to-mastectomy weight ratio among women with similar mastectomy weights. BSA varied by as much as 0.82 units, BMI varied by as much as 32 kg/m 2 , and SWR varied by as much as 1365 g within the same mastectomy weight group. There was also significant variance in mastectomy weights among women with comparable BSA, especially in BSA groups greater than 2.20, with the greatest range in mastectomy weights being 1684 g. Analysis of mastectomy patients showed no predictable relationship between BSA and breast weight. There was significant variance in the BSA of patients with similar breast weights, and conversely in breast weights of patients with comparable BSA. Therefore, strict adherence to the Schnur weight requirement can prevent patients with macromastia from receiving breast reductions.

Inframammary versus Periareolar Incision: A Comparison of Early Complications in Nipple-sparing Mastectomy.

Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), either used therapeutically or prophylactically, may yield more complications than conventional mastectomy. The incision may affect aesthetic outcome and complication rates, with periareolar incisions being associated with nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis. Early complications were compared between NSM performed in 2015-2022 using inframammary fold (IMF) or periareolar incisions. Overall, 180 procedures in 152 patients (bilateral NSM = 28) were included (IMF = 104; periareolar = 76). Mean age (47 versus 43.9 years; P < 0.038), mastectomy weight (312.7 versus 246.8 grams; P < 0.001), implant volume (447.5 versus 409.0 mL; P = 0.002), and use of tissue expanders (68.4% versus 50.0%; P = 0.013) were all greater with periareolar incisions. Prepectoral reconstruction was more common with IMF (18.3% versus 3.9%; P = 0.004). Forty-three complications (23.9%) were recorded (periareolar n = 27, 35%; IMF n = 16, 15.3%; P = 0.0002). NAC necrosis accounted for 17 complications (22.4%) in the periareolar group versus nine (8.5%) in the IMF group (P = 0.002). Necrosis was predominantly moderate (n = 6, 8.3% versus n = 1, 1.0%, respectively) (P = 0.014). Unadjusted odds ratios (OR) for complications [3.05; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.27-7.26] and necrosis (3.04; 95% CI: 1.27-7.27) were higher in the periareolar group. In the multivariate analysis, necrosis was associated with periareolar incisions [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.92; 95% CI: 1.14-7.44]. Prepectoral reconstruction was associated with IMF incisions (aOR: 25.51; 95% CI: 3.53-184.23; P = 0.001) and with body mass index of more than 25-30 (aOR: 37.09; 95% CI: 5.95-231.10; P < 0.001). Therapeutic mastectomies (aOR: 68.56; 95% CI: 2.50-188.36; P = 0.012) and tissue expanders (aOR: 18.36; 95% CI: 1.89-178.44; P = 0.026) were associated with seromas. Both incisions are viable options; however, the risk of NAC necrosis increased with the periareolar approach. Further research is required.

Safety and factors affecting same-day discharge following mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction.

Patients undergoing breast reconstruction following mastectomy are often admitted overnight. In 2020, our institution implemented a protocol change to discharge clinically stable patients immediately. In this study, we examine the safety of same-day discharge following mastectomy and reconstruction. Our retrospective study included female adults undergoing mastectomy and immediate alloplastic reconstruction from August 2019 to January 2020, before implementation of the same-day discharge protocol, and from March 2020 to September 2021, after the protocol implementation. Independent t-test and chi-square analysis was conducted to examine statistical differences. Two hundred and eighty-fivepatients were included. Forty-twopatients underwent reconstruction before the protocol change (Group 1) and 243 patients underwent reconstruction after the protocol change (Group 2). Group 2 had a greater percentage of prepectoral implant placement. There was no difference in demographics, complications, readmission, or reoperation. Within Group 2, 157 patients were discharged the same day (Group 2a) and 88 patients required overnight admission (Group 2b). Group 2b had higher body mass index, higher percentage of bilateral mastectomy, and larger mastectomy weights. Despite no differences in complications, Group 2b exhibited higher rates of requiring intravenous antibiotics and reoperation. Patients may be safely discharged the same day following mastectomy and alloplastic reconstruction without an increase in complications.

Prepectoral Direct-To-Implant One-Stage Reconstruction With ADMs: Safety and Outcome in “Thin Patients”

BackgroundPrepectoral direct-to-implant reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) represents a safe, fast, and successful option in breast reconstruction in a selected cohort of patients. Nowadays, this procedure is considered challenging in thin. Meanwhile, his cohort has not been accurately analyzed yet. MethodsA single institution retrospective cohort study was performed between January 2019 and March 2023 in all women who underwent mastectomy. Biometrical and clinical data were recorded. Also, surgical technique, operating room (OR) time, mastectomy weights, implant choice, and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) types were properly noted. Postoperative complications represented the main topic: these were classified into early and late ones based on onset time. At least 12-month follow-up was required. A comparison between thin and ideal body mass index (BMI) populations was performed. ResultsEarly complications did not seem to differ between the 2 groups with 37.8% and 38.9% of women having at least 1 early complication in thin and ideal-weight women, respectively (P = .919). In univariable regression analysis, compared with women with a BMI of 22.1 to 25.0, women with a BMI ≤ 22.0 were associated with an increased risk of late complications of 2.84 (1.13-7.14). Specifically, thin women appeared to have a 3-fold increased risk (OR = 2.97, 95% CI 1.08-8.18) of ripples/wrinkles compared with women with ideal weight. ConclusionsPrepectoral reconstruction with ADM in thin patients may be considered as safe as in standard BMI patients. Rippling may be more frequent, but, whenever needed, easy to correct with a few sessions of lipo-grafts. Level of EvidenceIII.

Estimation of Mastectomy Volume Using Preoperative Mastectomy Simulation Images Acquired by the Vectra H2 System.

All patients underwent skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Preoperatively, the patient's breast was scanned using the Vectra H2 and a postmastectomy simulation image was constructed on a personal computer. The estimated mastectomy volume was calculated by comparing the preoperative and postmastectomy three-dimensional simulation images. Correlation coefficients with the estimated mastectomy volume were calculated for the actual mastectomy weight and the transplanted flap weight. Forty-five breasts of 42 patients were prospectively analyzed. The correlations with the estimated mastectomy volume were r = 0.95 (P < 0.0001) for actual mastectomy weight and r = 0.84 (P < 0.0001) for transplanted free-flap weight. The mastectomy weight estimation formula obtained by linear regression analysis using the estimated mastectomy volume was 0.98 × estimated mastectomy volume + 5.4 (coefficient of determination R2 = 0.90, P < 0.0001). The root-mean-square error for the mastectomy weight estimation formula was 38 g. We used the Vectra H2 system to predict mastectomy volume. The predictions provided by this method were highly accurate. Three-dimensional imaging is a noncontact, noninvasive measurement method that is both accurate and simple to perform. Use of this effective tool for volume prediction is expected to increase in the future.

Wise-Pattern Mastectomy with an Inferior Dermal Sling: A Viable Alternative to Elliptical Mastectomy in Prosthetic-Based Breast Reconstruction.

Prosthetic-based postmastectomy breast reconstruction in patients with large or pendulous breasts remains challenging because of inelastic and redundant skin, with various approaches to skin reduction at the time of mastectomy. This study describes the authors' experience with a Wise-pattern inferior dermal sling approach to skin-sparing mastectomy. Retrospective chart review was performed on patients who underwent immediate prosthetic-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy from 2009 to 2021. A total of 240 patients who underwent Wise-pattern skin-sparing mastectomy (WSSM) were compared with a cohort of patients who had traditional elliptical skin-sparing mastectomy (ESSM), matched for mastectomy weight, prior radiation therapy, and smoking. Ninety-day postsurgical outcomes were examined. The WSSM cohort had a significantly higher body mass index (30.3 kg/m 2 versus 26.9 kg/m 2 ; P < 0.0001) and mastectomy weight (831 g versus 607 g; P < 0.0001). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in complication or treatment rates between WSSM and ESSM breasts except for mastectomy flap necrosis (11.6% versus 5.0%; P = 0.0082). WSSM patients who had mastectomy flap necrosis did not have significantly different treatment rates of admission, return to the operating room, or explantation compared with ESSM patients. In the largest reported series to date, WSSM was associated with a higher rate of mastectomy flap necrosis, but this did not translate into statistically significant differences in treatment. The inferior dermal flap likely acts as a protective layer of vascularized tissue, which appears to prevent evolution of mastectomy skin flap necrosis into more serious adverse outcomes. Therapeutic, III.