incidence in the control group. 4 We found that this method could be reliable and effective to prevent clinically significant VAE without deleterious side effects. Since that time, we have routinely used this method of prevention in 30‐40 procedures performed in sitting children each year. In our experience, MAST suit inflation and PEEP induce a reliable and sustained increase in right atrial pressure, sufficient to increase jugular bulb venous pressure above atmospheric level in children, and to prevent clinically significant VAE. We do agree with Minski et al. that PEEP alone cannot be recommended as a routine prevention method, because hemodynamic disturbances related to its use balance negatively its potentially beneficial effect on intrathoracic and right atrial pressures, especially in seated anesthetized patients. Preventive low levels of PEEP are so only used to amplify the increase in right atrial pressure, and to restore adequate ventilation in lower lung compartments that could be compressed with MAST suit inflation. Considering the potential hazards of this method, with “venous” pressure inflation, namely 40 mmHg in the abdominal compartment and 30 mmHg in the lower limbs compartment, we never observed the described potential risks of hypoperfusion to intraabdominal organs, and compartment syndromes. In our experience, urine output, which could be very sensitive to hypoperfusion of the kidneys during abdominal compression, never decrease under 1 ml · kg 1 ·h 1 . Moreover, we demonstrated that plasma creatine phosphate kinase level, which could reliably reflect muscular hypoperfusion and ischemia during MAST inflation, was not significantly increased in children with prolonged MAST inflation. When comparing the incidence of VAE occurrence during procedures performed in the prone or sitting position with PEEP and MAST suit inflation in children, we did notfind a significant difference, with only one episode of VAE related to a major surgical vascular effraction during dural closure occurring in a sitting patient. 5 This could be an additional argument to maintain the use of the sitting position in selected patients, provided that detection and prevention of VAE could be as efficiently secured in both situations. We therefore recommend consideration of the use of a MAST suit and moderate PEEP levels in children when surgical conditions require positioning of the patient in the sitting position.