Massive Rotator Cuff Tears Research Articles

What are the predictors of response to physiotherapy in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears? Gaining expert consensus using an international e-Delphi study

BackgroundMassive irreparable rotator cuff tears can cause significant shoulder pain and disability. Treatment options include physiotherapy or surgery, with a lack of research comparing treatment options. For physiotherapy there is uncertainty about which patients will have a successful or unsuccessful response to treatment and a lack of consensus on what constitutes the best physiotherapy programme. With these significant gaps in the research, it is challenging for clinicians seeing patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears to advise on what is their best treatment pathway.MethodsA three round Delphi study was conducted with expert shoulder physiotherapists and orthopaedic surgeons to gain consensus on the important factors associated with response to physiotherapy in this patient population. Round 1 was an information-gathering round to identify predictors of response to physiotherapy in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. Rounds 2 and 3 were consensus-seeking rounds on the importance and modifiability of the predictors. Consensus criteria were determined a priori using median, interquartile range, percentage agreement and Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance.ResultsParticipants were recruited April–October, 2023. 88 experts participated in Round 1 and of these, 70 completed Round 3 (79.54%). In Round 1, content analysis of 344 statements identified 45 predictors. In Round 2, 29 predictors reached consensus as important and 2 additional predictors were identified. In Round 3, of the 31 predictors from Round 2, 22 reached consensus as important and 12 of these reached consensus as modifiable by physiotherapists. Both patient factors and clinician factors from a broad range of domains reached consensus: biomechanical, psychological, social, co-morbidities, communication / healthcare interactions and pain.ConclusionsThe results of this Delphi study suggest that clinicians assessing patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears should assess across all these domains and target the modifiable factors with interventions. Particular emphasis should be placed on optimising modifiable clinician factors including therapeutic alliance, comprehensive explanation of the condition and collaborative and realistic goal-setting. These in turn may influence modifiable patient factors including patient expectations, engagement with the physiotherapy programme, motivation and self-efficacy thus creating the ideal environment to intervene on a biomechanical level with exercises.

Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer versus open complete repair for symptomatic massive rotator cuff tear

BackgroundSymptomatic massive rotator cuff tear (MRCT) treatment is challenging, and there is no clear treatment strategy. In our study, we aimed to compare latissimus dorsi tendon transfer (LDTT) and open complete repair (OCR) surgical techniques for the treatment of MRCT. MethodsCases of symptomatic MRCT treated surgically with LDTT and OCR techniques between 2014 and 2021 were included in the study. The study was conducted in two centers: 1) one surgeon performed LDTT in first center and 2) the other surgeon performed OCR in second center. This study included 18 cases of LDTT and 15 cases of OCR. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively in terms of demographic, radiological and functional scores. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley (CM) score, and visual analog scale (VAS) were used for functional evaluation. Symptom duration was defined as less than 6 months after onset, longer than 6 months and less than one year (<1Y)after onset, and longer than one year (>1Y) after onset. ResultsThe functional scores and range of motion improved significantly in both groups. No statistically significant differences were found between the symptom duration subgroups in the LDTT group. However, there was a significant difference in functional scores between <1Y and >1Y (P < 0.001) in the OCR group. Re-tear was seen in 5 (33.3 %) cases in the OCR group, and failure was seen in 3 (16.6 %) cases in the LDDT group. The failure rate was significantly higher in the OCR group than in the LDTT group (P < 0.05). ConclusionsLDTT technique is good option in the treatment of MRCT. However, in acute-subacute MRCT cases, open complete repair is a simpler, successful and safe technique. In chronic cases of >1Y, re-tear rates with OCR were high, and functional outcomes were low. We recommend that LDTT treatment for chronic cases (>1Y).

Convertible glenoid replacement in the anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty: medium-term results.

The older generation of high thickness metal-backed glenoid prostheses had a high failure rate. The goal of our study was to analyze the medium-term clinical and radiological results of a technically modified generation of metal backed glenoids with 35% decrease in thickness. Thirty-nine patients (43 shoulders) with a mean age of 66.5 years at surgery were examined from two to ten years (mean 71.2 months) using the Constant-Score, Subjective Shoulder Value and X-ray in a.p. and axial view. Indication for surgery included patients with glenoid types B1, B2, or B3 and/or posterior subluxation but intact rotator cuff, or patients who did not want a reverse prosthesis and had high functional demands. Inclusion criteria comprised participation in a clinical and radiological follow-up examination, along with a minimum follow-up duration of 24 months. Additionally, in all cases, the Constant Score and the Subjective Shoulder Value (PROM) had to be determined. Exclusion criteria were an incomplete dataset, implantation of a different prosthesis type, and failure to meet the minimum follow-up time. The absolute Constant Score (CS) improved significantly (p < 0.0001) from 43 ± 13 (range: 20-69) points before to 80 ± 13 (range: 46-98) points after surgery. The only preoperative negative influencing factor on the result was the glenoid protrusion according to Lévigne (p = 0.0150). No significant differences in functional outcomes were found between glenoid types A2,B1,B2 and B3. Radiolucent lines at the interface were observed in a total of four patients (13%). Radiological signs of glenoid osteolysis were seen in six patients (20%).Humeral upward migration was observed in four patients (13%) and posterior shoulder joint decentering occurred in one patient (3%). Implant-specific complications occurred in three cases (7%). Due to a massive rotator cuff tear, two cases (4.7%) had to be converted to a reversed implant, with the primary metal component remaining in place. If the implant-specific and rotator cuff-associated complications are summarized, the rate is 11.7%. All components that required conversion to an reverse implant have so far remained free of complications. Favorable clinical results can be achieved, especially in patients with an eccentric glenoid type. Severe preoperative glenoid erosion (Walch A2, B2, B3) does not appear to have any influence on postoperative functional results. The complication and revision rates are significantly better than in previous studies with conventional metal-backed glenoid components. Conversion of the anatomical glenoid component to a reverse system was always possible and good clinical results were achieved.

Analysis of risk factors and construction of nomogram model for arthroscopic single-row rivet repair

BackgroundThe factors influencing the clinical outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair are not fully understood.PurposeTo explore the factors related to the postoperative outcome of arthroscopic single-row rivet rotator cuff repair in patients with rotator cuff injury and to construct the related nomogram risk prediction model.Methods207 patients with rotator cuff injury who underwent arthroscopic single-row rivet rotator cuff repair were reviewed. The differences of preoperative and postoperative Visual Analogue Score (VAS) scores and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scores were analyzed and compared. The postoperative UCLA score of 29 points was taken as the critical point, and the patients were divided into good recovery group and poor recovery group, and binary logstic regression analysis was performed. According to the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis, the correlation nomogram model was constructed, and the calibration chart was used, AUC, C-index. The accuracy, discrimination and clinical value of the prediction model were evaluated by decision curve analysis. Finally, internal validation is performed using self-random sampling.ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 29.92 ± 17.20 months. There were significant differences in VAS score and UCLA score between preoperative and final follow-up (p < 0.05); multivariate regression analysis showed: Combined frozen shoulder (OR = 3.890, 95% CI: 1.544 ∼ 9.800), massive rotator cuff tear (OR = 3.809, 95%CI: 1.218 ∼ 11.908), More rivets number (OR = 2.118, 95%CI: 1.386 ∼ 3.237), lower preoperative UCLA score (OR = 0.831, 95%CI: 0.704–0.981) were adverse factors for the postoperative effect of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Use these factors to build a nomogram. The nomogram showed good discriminant and predictive power, with AUC of 0.849 and C-index of 0.900 (95% CI: 0.845 ∼ 0.955), and the corrected C index was as high as 0.836 in internal validation. Decision curve analysis also showed that the nomogram could be used clinically when intervention was performed at a threshold of 2%∼91%.ConclusionCombined frozen shoulders, massive rotator cuff tears, and increased number of rivets during surgery were all factors associated with poor outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, while higher preoperative UCLA scores were factors associated with good outcome after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This study provides clinicians with a new and relatively accurate nomogram model.

A match-pair analysis of single row vs transosseous equivalent double row in massive posterosuperior rotator cuff tears in patients > 70years old.

The aim of this study was to compare the results of single versus double row (TEO) in massive tears of the posterosuperior rotator cuff in patients older than 70years old. Between October 2019 and July 2022, 46 patients, older than 70years old, were operated on, in two centers, by one surgeon (FM), in one center, we performed a single-row repair, while in the other a double row, transosseous equivalent. Patients were paired by age andgender. All patients were studied with a preoperative MRI along withpreoperative age and gender adjusted constant score. Postoperative patients were evaluated at the end of the FU. Mean time of FU for single row was 3.2years (2-4.1) and for TOE was 3.5years (2.4-3). Mean age for SR patients was 71.15years (70-82) and for TOE was 74.8years (70-81). We were able to evaluate 20 pairs of patients (15 pairs of females and five pairs of males). CS differed in both groups of patients. Patients operated on with TOE had a better, but non-significant CS 81.3 (TOE) versus 75.7 (SR) p > 0.05. The patients operated own with TOE showed statistically significant better arm abduction strength than patients operated on with SR (p < 0.05). There was a trend for patients operated on with TOE to have a better ROM and less pain. The results of our work show that patients older than 70years old, with repairable RCT operated on with a transosseous equivalent, have a trend to have a better CS and a significantly better strength than patients operated on with SR.

Interposition Patches for Massive and Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Helpful or Not? A Prospective Study of 164 Consecutive Interposition Polytetrafluoroethylene Patch Repairs

Interposition Patches for Massive and Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Helpful or Not? A Prospective Study of 164 Consecutive Interposition Polytetrafluoroethylene Patch Repairs

Arthroscopically assisted pectoralis minor transfer for anterosuperior massive rotator cuff tear with irreparable subscapularis tears leads to significant improvement in pain and function at short-term follow-up

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to report the results of an arthroscopically assisted pectoralis minor transfer with an expanded indication to include Lafosse type 4 cases. In addition, prognostic factors for pectoralis minor transfer, including the Lafosse classification, were explored. MethodsOutcomes of arthroscopically assisted pectoralis minor tendon transfer for anterosuperior massive rotator cuff tear with irreparable subscapularis tears with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were retrospectively reviewed. Severe pseudoparesis with flexion of less than 30° was not indicated.All patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using a modified University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, active range of motion, and the visual analog pain scale (pain-VAS). Multiple regression models were used to determine predictors for UCLA score and elevation. ResultsSeventy-four consecutive patients (mean, 69.4 years; 65, male) were evaluated. The mean UCLA score increased from 15.3 preoperatively to 30.9 postoperatively (P < 0.001). The mean active elevation increased from 104° preoperatively to 148° postoperatively (P < 0.001). The mean active external rotation increased from 47° preoperatively to 57° postoperatively (P < 0.001). The pain-VAS improved from 62 to 11 mm postoperatively (P < 0.001). There were no serious complications, but one was revised with reverse shoulder due to ongoing pain. In multiple regression analysis, the positive predictors of UCLA and elevation were the preoperative external rotation angle (P = 0.0028) and elevation angle (P = 0. 00067), respectively. Lafosse classification was not a significant factor. ConclusionsArthroscopically assisted pectoralis minor transfer led to significant improvement in overall shoulder pain and function. Better preoperative range of motions was a significant predictor of better clinical outcomes; Lafosse classification was not significant as a prognostic factor. Level of EvidenceLevel IV, A retrospective therapeutic case series.

Treatment of massive rotator cuff tears with modified Chinese-way technique

To explore clinical effect of modified Chinese-way technique under shoulder arthroscopy in treating massive rotator cuff tears. From January 2019 to June 2022, 22 patients with massive rotator cuff tears who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with improved Chinese-way technique, including 10 males and 12 females, aged from 46 to 76 years old with an average of(64.14±7.45) years old;the courses of disease ranged from 5 to 14 months with an average of(8.32±2.42) months;19 patients were complete repaired, and 3 patients were partial repaired. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) scale were used to evaluate pain and function of shoulder joint preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Postoperative complications, the integrity of reconstructed tissue structure and the size of subacromial space were observed. All patients were followed up from 12 to 34 months with an average of (17.14±5.93) months. Re-tear were occurred in 4 patients during MRI follow-up, but clinical symptoms of patients were improved significantly and they were satisfied with the treatment, the others were no complications such as incision infection, peripheral nerve injury, loosening and falling off of internal fixation anchors. Preoperative and 1 year after operation VAS were (8.05±1.12) and (1.82±1.50), UCLA scores were (7.45±1.65) and (31.41±2.87) respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The modified Chinese-way technique under shoulder arthroscopy for the massive rotator cuff tear could relieve pain obviously and recovery postoperative function well, with satisfactory curative effect.

Biological Patch in the Repair of Rotator Cuff Tears: Functional and Clinical Evaluation of Twenty-Three Cases with a Mean Follow-Up of Six Years.

Background: Rotator cuff (RC) repair leads to less than optimal results when dealing with massive lesions, so the use of scaffolds as biological support has been proposed to improve RC repair site biology. The present study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographical outcomes of a series of patients suffering from massive or irreparable RC tears treated with patch (porcine or human scaffolds) repair (augmentation or bridging). Methods: Twenty-three patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months were subjectively, clinically, and radiographically assessed before and after surgery. Three different patient-related outcome measurements (PROMs) (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant score, visual analog scale) were used for the subjective and clinical evaluation, while plain radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging where employed for radiographical follow-up. Results: Regardless of the technique (augmentation or bridging) or type of scaffold (porcine or human) employed, at follow-up, all patients experienced a statistically significant improvement in all PROMs and clinically. Conclusions: Patch repair represents a valid salvage procedure in massive or irreparable RC tears, improving the quality of life and eventually delaying the need for prosthetic replacement.

Long head of biceps tendon autograft is effective in the management of large to massive rotator cuff tear: a systematic review.

The aim of this systematic review is to review the functional, clinical and radiological outcomes of patients undergoing large to massive rotator cuff repair with long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft, as well as compare these to standard arthroscopic cuff repair. A review of the online Medline database was conducted on 20 October 2022 according to PRISMA guidelines and registered prospectively on the PROSPERO database. Clinical studies assessing patients with large to massive rotator cuff tears undergoing LHBT autograft repair were included. All studies reported on functional outcomes, range of movement (ROM) and radiological re-tear rates. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomised Studies (MINORS) tool was used to appraise all studies. The search strategy identified ten studies for inclusion including a total of 594 patients. Five studies were comparable (346 patients), assessing LHBT autograft repair against arthroscopic rotator cuff repair without autograft. A variety of techniques of LHBT autograft were used across all studies, including bridging and augmentation styles. Radiographic comparison showed lower re-tear rates in the LHBT autograft group with two studies demonstrating statistically significant results. Pain scores, functional outcomes and ROM were significantly improved post-operatively in all studies for LHBT autograft patients, with no significant difference when compared to standard arthroscopic repair. LHBT autograft looks to significantly improve functional scoring and range of motion in patients with large to massive rotator cuff tears. When compared to standard arthroscopic cuff repair, LHBT autograft appears to significantly reduce the re-tear rate. Further randomised studies are needed to assess the efficacy of this technique.

Which muscle is the external rotation compensator after superior capsular reconstruction?

BackgroundSuperior capsular reconstruction (SCR) is a surgical option for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, particularly involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. In this procedure, the torn infraspinatus is not repaired or reconstructed. However, an improvement in postoperative external rotation (ER) angle and strength is observed. There is a lack of studies explaining how ER is restored after SCR. The aim of this study is to identify the ER compensator by assessing the muscle volume of the posterior deltoid and teres minor. MethodsSixty-eight patients with massive rotator cuff tears underwent SCR during 2016-2021. Of these patients, 28 who met the following inclusion criteria were retrospectively reviewed: (1) massive rotator cuff tears including the supraspinatus and infraspinatus; (2) severe muscle atrophy and fatty change; (3) intact or reparable subscapularis tendon; (4) Hamada of grade 3 or lower. Posterior deltoid and teres minor volume were measured by using an open-source medical image processing software preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. The percentage of the posterior deltoid and teres minor muscle volume change was compared between patients with 1-year postoperative ER manual motor testing (MMT) of grade 5 and of grade < 5. The relationship between grade of fatty change, percentage of the muscle volume change, and ER angle and strength were evaluated. ResultsThere was a significant increase in the 1-year postoperative teres minor volume compared with the preoperative volume (24.6±10.3 cm³ versus 20.9±8.3 cm³, p<0.000), while the posterior deltoid volume remained unchanged (178.1±48.3 cm³ versus 178.8±47 cm³). Patients with ER MMT of grade 5 had a greater teres minor volume compared to those with an ER MMT grade of less than 5 (22.3% versus 9.4%), although this difference was not significant (p=0.074, 95% CI=-1.3–27.0). The posterior deltoid volume showed no significant change. The percentage of teres minor volume change had a weak positive correlation with ER strength (r=0.308, p=0.055, 95% CI=-0.02–1.0). There was a significant negative correlation between ER strength and the severity of both preoperative and postoperative fatty changes in the teres minor (r=-0.258, p=0.065, 95% CI=-1.0–-0.042 and r=-0.323, p=0.028, 95% CI=-1.0–-0.113, respectively). The pre- and postoperative fatty changes in the teres minor were negatively correlated with the percentage of teres minor volume change (r=-0.298, p=0.062, 95% CI=-1.0–0.031 and r=-0.413, p=0.015, 95% CI=-1.0–-0.1, respectively). ConclusionThe teres minor may serve as a potential compensator for ER in patients with massive rotator cuff tears following SCR.

Patch Augmentation in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery-Review of Current Evidence and Newest Trends.

Background: Rotator cuff tears are a common and debilitating condition requiring surgical intervention. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is essential for restoring shoulder function and alleviating pain. Tear classification by size and tendon retraction, along with the grade for fatty infiltration, influence postoperative outcomes, with large tears and higher fatty infiltration grades linked to higher retear rates. Managing complex tears is challenging, with failure rates ranging from 20 to 94%. Patch augmentation has emerged as a promising strategy, using biological or synthetic materials to reinforce tendon repairs, enhancing structural integrity and reducing retear risk. Methods: A review of the recent literature from January 2018 to March 2024 was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. Keywords included "rotator cuff tear", "rotator cuff augmentation", "rotator cuff patch", "tendon augmentation", "massive rotator cuff tear", "patch augmentation", and "grafts". Relevant articles were selected based on their abstracts for a comprehensive review. Results: Initial methods used autograft tissues, but advances in biomaterials have led to standardized, biocompatible synthetic patches. Studies show reduced retear rates with patch augmentation, ranging from 17 to 45%. Conclusions: Patch augmentation reduces the retear rates and improves tendon repair, but complications like immune responses and infections persist. Cost-effectiveness analyses indicate that while initial costs are higher, long-term savings from reduced rehabilitation, revision surgeries, and increased productivity can make patch augmentation economically beneficial.

Reduced retear rates yet similar clinical outcomes following arthroscopic partial repair of large and massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with biceps augmentation compared to repairs without biceps augmentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the clinical outcomes between arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with biceps augmentation(BA) and partial repair (PR) without BA. This systematic review included studies comparing outcomes of arthroscopic repair for large to massive irreparable rotator cuff tears with and without the BA. The focus was on postoperative clinical results and retear rates. Mean differences were used to express continuous outcomes, while odds ratios (ORs) were employed for dichotomous outcomes. Ten studies (733 shoulders, all level 3 evidence) were included. The BA group showed a significant reduction in retear rates (OR = 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.77, P = 0.007) and comparable postoperative outcomes across various measures: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analogue scale for pain, University of California-Los Angeles shoulder score, active forward flexion motionand active external rotation at the arm-at-side position compared to the PR group. Subgroup analysis of two BA techniques-rerouting and supplementation following supraglenoid tenotomy-showed no significant differences in ASES score for either technique versus PR. However, rerouting significantly lowered retear rates (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12-0.36, p < 0.001), while supplementation showed similar retear rates to PR (OR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.37-2.02, n.s.). Arthroscopic partial rotator cuff repair with BA for large to massive irreparable rotator cuff tears is a reliable technique, resulting in improved postoperative outcomes. BA using supplementation following supraglenoid tenotomy showed similar clinical outcomes and range of motion but with lower retear rates compared to the PR group. Level III.

Shoulder balloon spacer for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears results in significant improvements.

The aim of the present study was to assess the effectiveness of balloon implantation in patients with irreparable supraspinatus tears alone or in combination withother rotator cuff (RC) tendon tearsand the effect of several covariables, such as age, gender, status of the long head biceps, with or without tendon repair and regardless the number of tendon involved. Patients enrolled from 'San Carlo' Hospital of Potenza (Italy, IT), from January 2012 to September 2014, underwent arthroscopic implantation of shoulder balloon by a single surgeon, and followed for 3 years. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant score (CS) were administered pre-, post-operatively at 12 months, and then annually. Patients were classified on the basis of the number of tendons involved in the tears and treatment performed, considering the reparability of the tendons themselves. Gleno-humeral joint osteoarthrosis (OA) was evaluated through shoulder radiographs and classified according to the Samilson-Prieto classification, at the first examination and at the final follow-up. Statistical improvements were evaluated using a variance model (least-squares means)and a T distribution test for the evaluation between different treatment groups. A total of 61 procedures were performed, and eight patients were lost during follow-up. The mean baseline CS was 30.2 ± 15.4 with statistically significant improvement, respectively, at 1-, 2- and 3-year follow-up to 69.3 ± 4.2, 74.6 ± 3.6 and 69.7 ± 5.1 respectively. ASES score at baseline was 22.5 ± 10.9, with a statistically significant improvement to 69.7 ± 9.2, 68 ± 17.8 and 71.2 ± 16.6 at 1-, 2- and 3-year follow-up, respectively. Tenotomy or absence of long head biceps at presentation did not influence results (n.s.), with no difference according to gender and age. At final follow-up, 24 patients (43.9%) showed progression of glenohumeral OA. One patient required secondary surgery for shoulder replacement after 18 months for persistent pain and one patient required implant removal following post-operative laser treatment. Arthroscopic rotator cuff tears repair with subacromial spacer balloon implantation showed statistically significant clinical and functional improvement at 3-year follow-up. Patients treated with combined partial repair and subacromial spacer balloon implantation experienced good results independent of gender, age, type of tear and long-head biceps tendon status. The risks related to this procedure appear to be minimal. Level IV.

Arthroscopic repair of shoulder dislocation with massive rotator cuff tears:a case report

Arthroscopic repair of shoulder dislocation with massive rotator cuff tears:a case report

Subacromial balloon spacer improves isokinetic performance in patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tear.

The aim of this study was to analyse clinical, functional and shoulder kinematics results using subacromial balloon spacer in nonreparable massive rotator cuff tears. Subacromial balloon spacer was hypothesised to improve shoulder kinematics and increases clinical and functional outcomes scores in nonreparable massive rotator cuff tears. This is a prospective study in massive rotator cuff tears. From October 2021 to October 2022, a total of 127 shoulders suffering massive rotator cuff tears were initially evaluated. All patients were evaluated preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months. Patients' patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) subjective values using visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Spanish Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) version were analysed. We also evaluated objective outcomes: constant score, range of movement and kinematic shoulder analysis (isokinetic test to evaluate internal and external rotation forces). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS software; continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviations (SDs). Seventeen nonrepairable massive rotator cuff tears were finally included. Three patients required reverse shoulder arthroplasty before 6 months postoperative. After 1-year follow-up, objective and subjective (PROM) outcome scores and isokinetic measurements improved in 13 patients. Preoperative VAS improved from 6.5 ± 2.1 to 2 ± 1.9 points on average at 1-year follow-up and WORC index from 1603 ± 217.3 to 699 ± 361.6. Constant score from 42.1 ± 13.1 on average and at 1-year follow-up increased to 60.8 ± 14.7. Range of movement also improved in elevation 122.2 ± 39.3 to 166.9 ± 25.8, abduction 120.3 ± 38.6 to 134.6 ± 21.1, external rotation 30.3 ± 19.7 to 86.1 ± 13.8 and internal rotation L4-T12 on average at 1-year follow-up. Isokinetic evaluation showed functional improvement 1 year after implantation. Both internal and external rotation improved compared with their healthy shoulder. External rotation improved from 30.3° ± 19.7° preoperatively to 86.1° ± 13.8° (43.7% in the isokinetic study) and internal rotation from L4 preoperatively to L1 (49.8% in isokinetic study) on average. Among the different alternatives for irreparable rotator cuff injuries surgical treatment, subacromial balloon spacer is an effective alternative in selected patients, both in terms of clinical-functional improvement and short-term isokinetic results. Level II.

Critical shoulder angle and acromial index do not influence functional outcomes after repair of massive rotator cuff tears

ObjectivesCritical shoulder angle (CSA) and acromial index (AI) are two radiographic signs that can influence the risk of rotator cuff tears and the outcomes of repair. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of CSA and AI on massive cuff tears and on the functional outcomes after repair. The hypothesis was that CSA and AI would be higher in posterosuperior compared to anterosuperior tears. MethodsCSA and AI were retrospectively measured on radiographs of patients who underwent repair of two rotator cuff tendons. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) at least six months postoperatively. Patients were divided according to the tendons repaired into anterosuperior group and posterosuperior group. Radiographic measurements and functional outcomes were compared. Patients in the posterosuperior group were subdivided into low or high CSA (cut-off value ​= ​39), and into low or high AI (cut-off value ​= ​0.75). All available preoperative magnetic resonance images were reviewed and graded according to Goutallier classification. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the influence of CSA, AI and Goutallier grade on functional outcomes. ResultsEighty six patients were included. Both CSA and AI were statistically significantly higher in the posterosuperior group (p ​= ​0.0143 and 0.0052, respectively). After a mean follow-up of 33 months, ASES and SST were significantly better in patients with Goutallier grades 0–1 than grades>1 (multivariate p ​= ​0.03 and 0.009, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found between low and high CSA and AI groups in terms of functional outcomes of the posterosuperior group after repair (multivariate p ​= ​0.9). ConclusionHigher CSA and AI seem to increase the risk of posterosuperior more than anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. Neither of these radiographic parameters influenced the functional outcomes of massive posterosuperior tears after repair. Level of evidenceLevel III.

Anterior cable reconstruction using subpectoral biceps tenodesis with biceps transfer in rotator cuff tears: a surgical technique

Massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) constitute approximately 20% of all rotator cuff tears. Poor tissue quality or significant retraction can lead to failure of the repair. The anterior rotator cuff cable is essential in transmitting force to the proximal humerus and serves as the main load-bearing structure within the supraspinatus. Utilizing the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) for anterior cable reconstruction in the setting of rotator cuff tears, known as biceps augmentation, has the potential for improved biomechanical and healing properties. Importantly, the proximal LHBT remains attached to the superior glenoid labrum, serving as a viable collagen scaffold, a structural scaffold for the cable, and potentially as a conduit for living tenocytes to migrate into the hypovascular region of the rotator cuff, promoting repair healing. Similar methods utilize the transfer of the intact LHBT into the rotator cuff without a biceps tenodesis. While this accomplishes the aforementioned goals, it may create a source of biceps pain in these patients, and it changes the length-tension relationship of the LHBT distal to the transfer site. In this technical note, we detail an anterior cable reconstruction employing an autologous LHBT to reinforce a repaired MRCT with concurrent subpectoral tenodesis of the LHBT to achieve goals of 1) rotator cuff augmentation and grafting and, importantly, 2) securing the LHBT in a subpectoral position to mitigate pain and maintain supination strength while maintaining the anatomic length-tension relationship of the biceps. We feel this approach is superior in ensuring sufficient tendon is retained for an effective transfer and allows for a subpectoral tenodesis to prevent biceps symptoms.

Supraspinatus Tendon Reconstruction Versus the Bridging Technique in a Rat Model: Histological, Biomechanical, and Functional Outcomes

Background: Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) are among the most challenging shoulder conditions to treat surgically. Supraspinatus tendon reconstruction (STR) is a recently introduced technique for MIRCTs based on fascia lata-muscle interface healing, which completely differs from the classic bridging technique with fascia lata-tendon interface healing. However, histological and biomechanical comparisons of the fascia-muscle and fascia-tendon interfaces have not been performed. Purpose: To investigate the histological and biomechanical healing of the fascia-bone interface and fascia-muscle interface after chronic MIRCTs in a rat model using different surgical methods. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: The authors established a chronic MIRCT model in the right shoulder of rats and then repaired it using the STR or bridging repair technique. Evaluations were performed at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, including histological, imaging, biomechanical, and functional analyses. Results: Both techniques resulted in good fascia-bone interface healing based on the histological results. The STR group had significantly more cartilage formation at 8 and 12 weeks and higher Modified Tendon Maturity Score after 12 weeks at the fascia-bone interface compared with the bridging repair group and formed the typical 4-layered structure. Collagen fibers in the fascia-muscle and fascia-tendon interfaces exhibited normal muscle-tendon interface characteristics at 12 weeks. However, the STR group had more improvement in fatty infiltration compared with the bridging repair group. The ultimate failure load and stiffness did not differ between the STR and bridging repair groups 4 weeks postoperatively in both the fascia-bone interface and supraspinatus muscle-fascia-bone integrity. Movement distance and grasp time were significantly longer in the STR group than in the bridging repair group at 12 weeks and attached the level in the normal control groups. Conclusion: These results suggest that the fascia-muscle interface from the STR technique is histologically and functionally better than the fascia-tendon interface. Moreover, this study provides a theoretical basis for the clinical use of the STR technique. Clinical Relevance: The fascia-muscle interface and fascia-tendon interface were the key points of the STR and bridging techniques, respectively. The fascia-muscle interface is histologically and functionally superior to the bridging technique, and the STR technique might be a better choice for the treatment of MIRCTs.

Improved Acromiohumeral Distance Independently Predicts Better Outcomes After Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction Graft Tears

PurposeTo identify independent factors responsible for the poor outcomes after a graft tear after arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction (ASCR). MethodsPatients who underwent ASCR for massive rotator cuff tears between January 2013 and July 2021were reviewed. Based on the achievement of the minimal clinically important differences for clinical outcome measures at the final follow up, patients were divided into the good outcome (GO) and poor outcome (PO) groups. The minimal clinically important differences were calculated as the values equal to one‐half of the standard deviation of the changes in outcome scores between the preoperative baseline and the latest follow‐up. Pre- and final follow-up variables included demographics, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Constant score, visual analog scale (VAS) score, range of motion, Preoperative and postoperative 1-year radiological variables were analyzed using MRIs, including anteroposterior (AP) and mediolateral (ML) tear sizes, subscapularis tear, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), and degree of fatty degeneration. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the significant predictors of poor outcomes. ResultsA total of 33 patients who underwent ASCR presented with graft tears, which were confirmed by postoperative 1-year magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and had a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years after surgery were enrolled. The GO group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in functional outcomes compared with the PO group (ASES: 83.5 ± 11.8 vs. 64.0 ± 20.4, P = 0.004; Constant: 67.6 ± 5.7 vs. 57.1 ± 9.8, P <0.001; and VAS: 0.9 ± 1.2 vs. 2.4 ± 2.0, P = 0.026). The postoperative 1-year AHD showed significant improvement in the GO group (3.1 ± 1.2 vs. 6.1 ± 1.4, P <0.001) but no change in the PO group (3.4 ± 1.3 vs. 4.2 ± 0.9, P = 0.074) postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that a decreased postoperative 1-year AHD (OR, 0.145; P = 0.019) was associated with a poor outcome after a graft tear. ConclusionA narrow postoperative 1-year AHD was identified as the most importantindependent risk factor indicating poor clinical outcomes after a graft tear post-ASCR, which was related to a larger tear and loss of integrity between the grafts and infraspinatus at 1 year postoperatively. Level of evidenceLevel IV.