Massive Cuff Tears Research Articles

Muscle Advancement During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair as a Treatment Option for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears.

The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears presents a surgical dilemma. However, supraspinatus muscle advancement (MA) could be used to convert irreparable to reparable tears without requiring a graft. To compare the outcomes of patients with an irreparable tear who underwent rotator cuff repair with MA with those with a reparable large to massive cuff tear who underwent rotator cuff repair. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. We enrolled 62 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair for a large to massive tear between January 2020 and May 2022. Among them, 29 patients underwent an MA procedure due to an inability to repair despite releases (MA group), whereas the other 33 patients did not require the procedure (NMA group). At 1 year postoperatively, follow-up assessments including magnetic resonance imaging were performed to evaluate group outcomes. Despite there being more revision surgery cases and a poorer potential for cuff healing in the MA group, the retear rates in the MA and NMA groups were similar (31.0% vs 21.2%, respectively; P = .401), as were clinical outcomes, including the visual analog scale for pain (2.9 vs 1.9; P = .076), University of California, Los Angeles (27.0 vs 29.1; P = .185), Constant (70.1 vs 74.9; P = .063), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (74.5 vs 81.8; P = .168) scores. Postoperative muscle power during forward elevation was weaker in the MA group than in the NMA group (35.1 vs 45.8 N; P = .052), but external rotation power was comparable (49.3 vs 59.0 N; P = .121). Progress in fatty degeneration of the supraspinatus was not significantly different in the 2 groups (P = .43), although the MA group showed a nonsignificant decrease in supraspinatus atrophy (P = .092) due to the lateral shift produced by the procedure. The MA procedure for irreparable tears produced outcomes comparable with reparable tears, offering a valuable perspective on the efficiency of the procedure. The comparable but relatively high retear rates emphasize the need for further studies to compare with other treatment options for irreparable tears.

Critical shoulder angle and acromial index do not influence functional outcomes after repair of massive rotator cuff tears

ObjectivesCritical shoulder angle (CSA) and acromial index (AI) are two radiographic signs that can influence the risk of rotator cuff tears and the outcomes of repair. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of CSA and AI on massive cuff tears and on the functional outcomes after repair. The hypothesis was that CSA and AI would be higher in posterosuperior compared to anterosuperior tears. MethodsCSA and AI were retrospectively measured on radiographs of patients who underwent repair of two rotator cuff tendons. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) at least six months postoperatively. Patients were divided according to the tendons repaired into anterosuperior group and posterosuperior group. Radiographic measurements and functional outcomes were compared. Patients in the posterosuperior group were subdivided into low or high CSA (cut-off value ​= ​39), and into low or high AI (cut-off value ​= ​0.75). All available preoperative magnetic resonance images were reviewed and graded according to Goutallier classification. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the influence of CSA, AI and Goutallier grade on functional outcomes. ResultsEighty six patients were included. Both CSA and AI were statistically significantly higher in the posterosuperior group (p ​= ​0.0143 and 0.0052, respectively). After a mean follow-up of 33 months, ASES and SST were significantly better in patients with Goutallier grades 0–1 than grades>1 (multivariate p ​= ​0.03 and 0.009, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found between low and high CSA and AI groups in terms of functional outcomes of the posterosuperior group after repair (multivariate p ​= ​0.9). ConclusionHigher CSA and AI seem to increase the risk of posterosuperior more than anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. Neither of these radiographic parameters influenced the functional outcomes of massive posterosuperior tears after repair. Level of evidenceLevel III.

Short-Term Results after Reversed Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Abstract Purpose Massive rotator cuff tear, with or without arthritis and proximal humerus fracture non-union or malunion, lead to the loss of center of rotation of shoulder, while anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty does not provide a stable center of rotation, Therefor reversed total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is the suitable method for these indications, as well as in elderly patients with primary glenohumeralosteoarthritis because anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty has the risk of failure either due to loosening of glenoid component or cuff tear. This study aimed to determine the short-term results after RTSA in patients a with massive cuff tear, acute proximal humerus fracture, proximal humerus fracture malunion or non- union, and primary glenohumeralosteoarthritis. Methods This one arm clinical trial (interventional study) conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals included 16 patients who underwent RTSA. Short-term outcomes included constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and range of motion (ROM). Patients with rotator cuff arthropathy, massive irreparable cuff tear with or without glenohumeralarthritis, elderly patients with acute complex proximal humerus fracture, malunited or nonunited proximal humerus fracture, and patients with glenohumeralosteoarthritis were included. Patients who were aged <50 years were excluded, as well as patients with axillary nerve injury or deltoid muscle dysfunction. Results This study included 16 patients, including 8 males and 8 females. The mean age was 64.19 years and the duration of follow up-was 1 year postoperatively. Seven Patients with massive irreparable cuff tear were included, of them, 1 had associated anterior shoulder instability and recurrent anterior dislocation, 3 had a four-part proximal humerus fracture, 2 had fracture dislocation, 2 had proximal humerus fracture non –union, 1had neglected dislocation, and 2 had glenohumeralosteoarthritis. Outcomes were followed using constant and ASES scoring systems, and ROM. The global postoperative gain was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Complication in the form of dislocation occurred in one case that had RTSA after fracture non-union. Conclusion Good clinical and functional outcomes were achieved after RTSA, not only for classic massive cuff tear indication, but for other disorders, such as acute proximal humerus fracture, fracture non-union, and primary glenohumeralosteoarthritis. However, the outcomes after irreparable cuff tear were the best among all indications, while fracture non-union had the least improvement in clinical outcomes. Improvements in prosthesis design, surgeon’s experience, and clinical results are necessary to optimize this treatment for many shoulder conditions.

Short-Term Results after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Abstract Background: The loss of the shoulder’s center of rotation is caused by massive rotator cuff tears, which can occur with or without arthritis and proximal humerus fractures that are nonunion or malunion. Because anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty cannot provide a stable center of rotation, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is the appropriate procedure for these indications and in older patients who have primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty carries a risk of failure because of the loosening of the glenoid component or cuff tear. The purpose of this study was to determine the short-term outcomes following RTSA in patients who had primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis, acute proximal humerus fractures, malunited or nonunited proximal humerus fractures, and massive cuff tears. Materials and Methods: This single-arm clinical trial (interventional study) was done in Ain Shams University Hospitals; 16 patients were included who underwent RTSA. Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon score, Visual Analog Scale score, and range of motion (ROM) were the short-term outcomes. Patients with cuff tear arthropathy, irreparable cuff tear with or without glenohumeral arthritis, elderly patients with unreconstructable proximal humerus fracture, proximal humerus fracture malunion or nonunion, and patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis were included. Patients under the age of 50, as well as those with deltoid muscle dysfunction or injuries to the axillary nerve, were excluded. Results: There were 16 patients in this study, 8 of whom were male and 8 of whom were female. The follow-up period lasted 2 years following surgery, with a mean age of 64.19 years. The study included 7 patients with irreparable cuff tears one of them had associated anterior shoulder instability and recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation. One patient had a neglected shoulder dislocation, two patients had proximal humerus fracture dislocation, two patients had a nonunited proximal humerus fracture, three patients had unreconstructable proximal humerus fracture, and two had glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Conclusion: Not only did RTSA provide good clinical and functional outcomes for the standard indication of a massive cuff tear, but it also proved beneficial for other disorders such as primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis, nonunited fracture, and acute proximal humerus fracture. Among all indications, irreparable cuff tears yielded the highest results; nonunited fractures displayed the least improvement regarding clinical outcomes. Enhancements in the design of prostheses, the expertise of surgeons, and clinical outcomes are crucial to maximize their effectiveness in treating various shoulder disorders.

Bursal Acromial Resurfacing Improves Shoulder Biomechanics in a Cadaveric Model of Massive Rotator Cuff Tear

PurposeTo investigate the effectiveness of bursal acromial resurfacing (acromiograft) on acromiohumeral distance, subacromial contact area, and pressure in a cadaveric model of massive rotator cuff tear. MethodsEight fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested using a customized shoulder testing system. Humeral head translation, subacromial contact pressure, and the subacromial contact area were evaluated across four conditions: (1) intact shoulder; (2) simulated massive rotator cuff tear; (3) 3-mm acromiograft condition; (4) 6-mm acromiograft condition. The acromiografts were simulated using Teflon and a reported technique. The values were measured at 0°, 20°, and 40° abduction and 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° external rotation (ER) for each abduction status. ResultsCompared with a massive cuff tear, the 6-mm acromiograft significantly reduced the superior translation of the humeral head at all abduction/ER angles (P<0.05). The 3-mm acromiograft also decreased superior translation of the humeral head compared to massive cuff tear, but not all differences were significant. The 3- and 6-mm acromiografts significantly decreased the subacromial contact pressure and increased the subacromial contact area in almost all positions (P<0.05). The 3-mm acromiograft maintained biomechanical properties similar to the intact condition, whereas the 6-mm acromiograft increased the contact area. ConclusionsThis biomechanical study demonstrated that both 3- and 6- mm acromiografts using Teflon in a cadaveric model of a massive cuff tear resulted in recentering of the superiorly migrated humeral head, increased the subacromial contact area, and decreased the subacromial contact pressure. The 3- mm graft was sufficient for achieving the intended therapeutic effects. Clinical relevanceThe acromiograft can normalize altered biomechanics and may aid the treatment of massive cuff tears. As grafting the acromion's undersurface is new with limited clinical outcomes, further observation is crucial. Using Teflon instead of ADM allograft for bursal acromial resurfacing could yield different results, requiring careful interpretation.

Medial scapular body (MSB) Goutallier classification: MRI-based reliability and validity of evaluation of the Goutallier classification for grading fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff

IntroductionThe degree of atrophy and fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscle belly is a key predictor for cuff repairability. Traditionally, Goutallier grading of fatty infiltration is assessed at sagittal scapular Y-view. Massive rotator cuff tears are associated with tendon retraction and medial retraction of cuff musculature, resulting in medialization of the muscle bulk. Thus, standard Y-view can misrepresent the region of interest and may misguide clinicians when assessing repairability. It is hypothesized that by assessing the muscle belly with multiple medial sagittal MRI sections at medial scapular body, the Medial Scapular Body - Goutallier Classification (MSB-GC) will improve reliability and repeatability giving a more representative approximation to the degree of fatty infiltration, as compared with original Y-view. MethodsFatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscles were classified based on the Goutallier grade (0 to 4) at three defined sections section 1: original Y-view; section 2: level of suprascapular notch; section 3: three cm medial to suprascapular notch on MRI scans. Six sub-specialist fellowship trained shoulder surgeons, and three musculoskeletal radiologists independently evaluated deidentified MRI scans of included patients. ResultsOut of 80 scans, 78% (n=62) were massive cuff tears involving supraspinatus, infraspinatus and subscapularis tendon. Inter-observer reliability (consistency between observers) for Goutallier grade was excellent for all three predefined sections (range:0.87–0.95). Intra-observer reliability (repeatability) for Goutallier grade was excellent for all three sections and four rotator cuff muscles (range:0.83-0.97). There was a moderate to strong positive correlation of Goutallier grades between sections 1 and 3 and between sections 2 and 3 and these were statistically significant (p<0.001). There was a reduction in the severity of fatty infiltration on the Goutallier classification from sections 1 to 3 across all muscles. 42.5% of both supraspinatus and infraspinatus were downgraded by one, 20% of supraspinatus and 3.8% of infraspinatus were downgraded by 2 and 2.5% of supraspinatus were downgraded by 3. ConclusionThis study found that applying the Goutallier classification to more medial MRI sections (MSB-GC) resulted in assignment of lower grades for all rotator cuff muscles. Additionally, this method demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability and repeatability. Inclusion of a more medial view or whole scapula on MRI, especially in advanced levels of tear retraction, could be more reliable and representative for assessment of the degree of fatty infiltration within the muscle bulk that could help predict tear repairability and therefore improve clinical decision-making which should be studied further in clinical studies.

Is there a role for acromioplasty and tuberoplasty in reverse shoulder arthroplasty to improve impingement-free range of motion?

Hypothesis and BackgroundLateralizing the center of rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) decreases the risk of scapular notching due to inferior impingement but may limit range of motion (ROM) in abduction and forward flexion related to superior acromial impingement. Our primary hypothesis was that, using a 3-dimensional (3D) computer model, a virtual acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) could improve abduction and forward flexion following RSA for cuff tear arthritis (CTA) or massive cuff tear. Our secondary hypothesis was that, based on the virtual planning, a surgical acromioplasty could be performed safely during RSA, without increasing the risk of postoperative acromial fracture. MethodsEighty seven patients with CTA scheduled for RSA were analyzed with a 3D software and impingement-free ROM was measured. After virtual prosthesis implantation, early acromio-humeral impingement (abduction ≤ 80° or forward flexion ≤ 120°) was observed in 25% of the cases (22/87). A virtual acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) was then performed and glenohumeral ROM was measured again. Based on this 3D planning, a surgical acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) was performed to improve ROM in the vertical plane in these 22 patients with early acromial impingement. Patients were followed with minimum 24 months of follow-up to assess final shoulder ROM and complications. ResultsAfter virtual acromioplasty alone (n = 11) or acromioplasty with tuberoplasty (n = 11), glenohumeral abduction significantly increased from 75° ± 6.9 before to 89.5° ± 23.4, and forward flexion from 119.3° ± 12 to 135.2° ± 10 (P < .001). After surgical acromioplasty/tuberoplasty, the final mean global forward flexion was 148° ± 5 and mean global abduction 150° ± 8 in these patients. At last follow-up, no acromial fracture was observed. ConclusionIn a 3D model, early acromial impingement may limit abduction (≤80°) or forward flexion (≤120°) after virtual RSA implantation for CTA or massive cuff tear. Virtual acromioplasty (with or without tuberoplasty) shows improved ROM in abduction and flexion. In patients with early impingement, a surgical acromioplasty can be performed safely during RSA, through a deltopectoral approach, without increasing the risk of postoperative acromial fracture.

Clinical significance of intraoperative glenohumeral joint load evaluation using a novel humeral sensor in navigated reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BackgroundAdvances in preoperative planning and technology have assisted the surgeon in appropriate placement of implants during reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). However, assessment of soft tissue tension, balance, and stability remains subjective and dependent on surgeon experience. The aims of this study are to measure intraoperative joint loads with a novel trial humeral load sensor during RTSA, to evaluate the utility of this device in the operative setting, and to determine the association between recorded joint loads and postoperative patient-reported outcomes. MethodsA pilot study of 15 patients with the diagnosis of osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthropathy, or massive cuff tear were scheduled for computer-navigated RTSA and intraoperative joint load measurements. Following appropriate soft tissue releases, load recordings were made in standardized arm positions: neutral, across the chest, behind the back, and overhead. Participants were clinically and radiographically reviewed at 3 and 12 months post-surgery for evidence of joint instability, bony stress reaction or fracture, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. ResultsIntraoperative joint load measurements vary between participants, but there were no significant associations with age or body mass index (P > .05). Mean joint load in the neutral position was recorded as 6.1 lbf (standard deviation [SD] 7.4 range 0-25). In each of the three testing positions, mean joint load was recorded in the range of 30-40 lbf. Maximum joint loads above 70 lbf were observed in individual participants. There were no postoperative complications including joint instability or bony stress reactions. At 3 months, no statistically significant correlations were observed between clinical scores and load measures. At 12 months, the mean ASES score was 83.1 (SD 11.6, range 63.3-98.3), and demonstrated a large and significant association with load magnitude in the behind back position (r = 0.66, P = .008). The mean ASES pain subscale score was 45.3 (SD 6.4, range 30.0-50.0) and demonstrated a significant association with load magnitude in the behind back position (r = 0.69, P = .004) and with load magnitude in the across chest position (r = 0.55, P = .034). No other significant associations were observed. DiscussionThis pilot study indicates a novel humeral trial load sensor can be used safely and effectively during RTSA. This trial reports a range of intraoperative joint load measurements in neutral and commonly performed arm positions, which at 12 months post-surgery are associated with satisfactory shoulder function. Further clinical studies are required to define an upper limit for intraoperative joint load, which may potentially compromise clinical outcome.

Do preoperative scapular fractures affect long-term outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Postoperative scapular stress fractures (SSFs) are a formidable problem after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Less is known about patients who have these fractures preoperatively. The primary aim of this study was to examine postoperative satisfaction in patients undergoing primary RSA who have preoperative SSF and compared to a matched cohort without preoperative fracture. The secondary aim was to examine the differences in patient-reported outcomes between and within study cohorts. A retrospective chart review of primary RSAs performed by a single surgeon from 2000 to 2020 was conducted. Patients diagnosed with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA), massive cuff tear (MCT), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were included. Five hundred twenty-five shoulders met inclusion criteria. Fractures identified on preoperative computed tomography scans were divided into 3 groups: (1) os acromiale, (2) multifragments (MFs), and (3) Levy types. Seventy-two shoulders had an occurrence of SSF. The remaining 453 shoulders were separated into a nonfractured cohort. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared pre- and postoperatively in the total fracture group and the nonfractured group cohort. The multifragment subgroup was also compared to the pooled Os/Levy subgroup. The total incidence of SSF in all shoulders was 13.7%. There was a difference in satisfaction scores at all time points between the nonfracture (7.9±2.8) and total fracture group (5.4±3.6, P <.001, at last visit). There was also a greater ASES total score in the nonfractured group vs the total fracture group at the final visit (69.4±23.4 and 62.1±24.2; P=.02). The MF group had worse ASES functional or VAS functional scores than the Os/Levy group at all time points: at 1 year, ASES function: MF 24.2±14.5 and Os/Levy 30.7±14.2 (P=.045); at 2 years, ASES function: MF 21.4±14.4 and Os/Levy 35.5±10.6 (P <.001); and at last follow-up, VAS function: MF 4.8±2.8 and Os/Levy 6.4±3.2 (P=.023). Scapular fractures were proportionally most common in patients diagnosed with CTA (16.3%) compared with a 9.2% and 8.6% incidence in patients diagnosed with MCT and RA, respectively. Patients with preoperative SSF still see an improvement in ASES scores after RSA but do have lower satisfaction scores compared with the nonfractured cohort. The multifragment fracture group has lower functional and satisfaction scores at all postoperative time points compared with both the nonfracture and the Os/Levy fracture group.

Can we separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

Lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) can be measured on anteroposterior (AP) radiographs using 2 previously described angles: lateralization shoulder angle (LSA) and distalization shoulder angle (DSA). However, these 2 angles measure global lateralization and distalization but do not allow to differentiate how much lateralization or distalization are attributable to the glenoid and the humerus. We hypothesized that new angles could allow us to separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization. A more precise understanding of independent glenoid and humeral contributions to lateralization and distalization may be beneficial in subsequent clinical research. Retrospective analysis of postoperative AP radiographs of 100 patients who underwent primary RSA for cuff-tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, or glenohumeral osteoarthritis were analyzed. The new angles that we proposed use well-known bony landmarks (the acromion, glenoid, and humerus) and the most lateral point of the glenosphere, which we termed the "glenoid pivot point" (GPP). For lateralization, we used the GPP to split LSA into 2 new angles: glenoid lateralization angle (GLA) and humeral lateralization angle (HLA). For distalization, we introduced the modified distalization shoulder angle (mDSA) that can also be split into 2 new angles: glenoid distalization angle (GDA) and humeral distalization angle (HDA). Three orthopedic surgeons measured the new angles, using the online tool Tyche. Mean values with overall and individual standard deviations as well as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. Because the angles form a triangle, the following equations can be made: LSA=GLA+HLA, and mDSA=GDA+HDA. All angles showed excellent inter- and intraobserver reliability (ICC=0.92-0.97) with low means of individual standard deviations that indicate a precision of 2° for each angle. Use of the most lateral part of the glenosphere (termed glenoid pivot point) allows us to separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization. The 4 new angles (HLA, GLA, GDA, HDA) described in the present study can be used on true AP radiographs, routinely obtained after shoulder replacement, and the measured angles may be used with all types of reverse prostheses available.

“New innovative QR code-based mobile audience response system (mARS) for panel discussion (PD) in a Indian Arthroscopy Society conference(IASCON) of 1102 registered delegates.” - A cross-sectional study

PurposeThe purpose is to determine the feasibility of Mobile based Audience response system (mARS) and the best time to get maximum delegate participation in panel discussion at a national Indian Arthroscopic Society conference(year-2022) with 1102 delegates by studying their engagement at various time schedules. MethodsOur institution-based software engineer set up mARS, and a separate URL, was purchased for recording the responses. 5 Panel discussions (PD) were moderated by senior national faculty, 3 were on knee topics, and 2 were on Shoulder topics. The audiences were engaged in ongoing PD discussion by displaying the multiple choice questions (MCQs) questions for 15–30 seconds & real-time response was collated, and poll results were declared in real-time during the conference. The data of each panel discussion was acquired from admin page & statistical analysis was done to determine the audience participation in Hall A (Knee) versus Hall B (Shoulder), Day 2 versus day 3 and pre-lunch session versus post-lunch session. ResultsMaximum number of delegates (252) participated in Multi-ligament knee injury (MLKI)PD (day 2); however, percentage of response was higher for Massive cuff tear PD (day 3). Audience response was better on day 2, for shoulder topics and pre-lunch session PD than on day 3, knee topics and post-lunch sessions & this was statistically significant (p < 0.001). ConclusionsmARS proves is an innovative and valuable resource, enhancing audience participation during PD at large gatherings. Real-time results aids not only active delegate engagement but also helps moderators/panellist in curating discussions to answer uncommon queries and unify the responses. The most suitable time for PD sessions utilizing mARS is the pre-lunch slot on day 2. Level of the evidenceLevel 3 (Decision Analysis- Observational cross-sectional study). Study designCross-Sectional Study. RelevanceThis article helps the organizers of larger meeting to time the panel discussion appropriately to obtain maximum audience participation and curate the discussion based on delegate centric responses. Key termsmobile Audience response system (mARS), Audience response system (ARS), Panel Discussion(PD), Indian Arthroscopic Society conference (IASCON), Indian Arthroscopy society (IAS). What is known about the subjectAudience response system (ARS) in the smaller meeting and webinars are well known entity to have active participation in on-going discussion. “What are the new findings?”Response and results of innovative QR code-based mobile Audience response system (mARS) for Panel discussion (PD) in larger arthroscopic conference with 1102 delegates showed delegates were more interested in Shoulder topics and pre-lunch session and Day 2 response were better.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Massive Irreparable Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review for Clinical &amp; Functional &amp; Radiological Outcomes

Background Massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) are defined as a full-thickness tear of at least two tendons or measuring greater than five centimeters in diameter in the coronal plane. They represent about 20% of all rotator cuff tears and 80% of recurrent tears. Aim of the Work The treatment of massive irreparable cuff tears (MIRCT) is considered a consistent challenge for the orthopedic surgeons regarding the best management and the postoperative outcomes. Patients and Methods Search were conducted using the following databases: MEDLINE database, PubMed, Cochrane Bone and Muscle Trauma Group Specialized Register, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trails (The Cochrane Library). Data will be independently extracted by two reviewers and cross-checked. Results In radiological parameters, this review makes radiological assessment based on acromiohumeral distance and MRI graft integrity. AHD showed significant improvement in mean change postoperatively rather than preoperatively. As regarding MRI graft integrity, despite this high failure rate (20%) most patients still experienced improved functional outcome scores with two studies reporting no significant differences in functional scores between the intact and re-tear group. but on the other hand Denard et al. demonstrated that 100% of patients with healed grafts had a successful outcome compared to 45.5% when the graft did not heal (p = 0.009). Conclusion Not all patients with massive cuff tears are appropriate candidates for complex joint preservation surgery such as SCR because of age, comorbidities, and ability to participate in the lengthy postoperative rehabilitation, so rTSA is an optimal option for elderly, low-demand patients who can benefit from the speed of surgery and rehabilitation with rTSA for massive rotator cuff tears without arthritis.

PSEUDOPARALYSIS

The definition of pseudoparalysis in shoulder is controversial. Gwschend initially described pseudoparalysis as an appearance of paralysis with severe rotator cuff tear. Later, Werner described pseudoparesis as active elevation under 90° caused by an irreparable massive cuff tear. Since these descriptions, many articles across the literature make the confusion between pseudoparesis and pseudoparalysis who differ in term of lesion and treatment options. Subsequently, this adds confusion to confusion when evaluating the results to determine the optimal therapeutic strategy. Conservative and arthroplasty options are discussed but the reverse arthroplasty appears to be the treatment of choice in a true pseudoparalyzed shoulder.

Arthroscopic revision cuff repair: do tendons have a second chance to heal?

Few studies have investigated postoperative tendon integrity after reoperation for failed rotator cuff repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the anatomic and clinical outcomes of arthroscopic revision rotator cuff repair (AR-RCR) and identify the risk factors related to re-retear. Sixty-nine consecutive patients (mean age, 55 years) with primary failed open (38%) or arthroscopic (62%) cuff repairs underwent AR-RCR and were reviewed regarding clinical examination findings and imaging studies. Patients with massive cuff tears and upward humeral migration (acromiohumeral distance < 6 mm) or glenohumeral osteoarthritis were excluded. Revision repair was performed by a single, experienced shoulder surgeon. Complete footprint coverage was achieved in all cases using a single-row (70%), double-row (19%), or side-to-side (11%) technique. The primary outcome measure was tendon healing assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (57 cases) or computed tomography arthrogram (12 cases) performed at minimum 1-year follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included functional outcome scores, subjective results, and complications. The mean follow-up period was 43 months (range, 12-136 months). The cuff tendons did not heal to the tuberosity in 36% of the shoulders (25 of 69) following revision cuff surgery. Absence of tendon healing was associated with poorer shoulder function (average Constant score, 69±20 vs. 54±18; P=.003) and a decreased Subjective Shoulder Value (72% vs. 54%, P=.002). Factors that were negatively associated with tendon healing were age ≥ 55 years (odds ratio [OR], 4.5 [95% confidence interval, 1.6-12.5]; P=.02), tendon retractionof stage 2 or higher (OR, 4.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.4-14.3]; P=.01), and fatty infiltration index > 2 (OR, 10.2; P<.0001). No differences in retear rates were found between single-row and double-row cases. In 36 shoulders, tissue samples were harvested and submitted for bacteriologic culture analysis; 13 (36%) showed positive findings for infection (Cutibacterium acnesin 12 of 13) and associated antibiotic treatment was given. Overall, 25% of patients had unsatisfactory clinical results and 22% were disappointed or dissatisfied. At last follow-up, 4 patients (5.7%) underwent reoperations, with a second AR-RCR in 1 and conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 3. Despite careful patient selection and intraoperative complete footprint coverage, in this study the tendons did not heal to bone in 36% of cases after revision cuff surgery. The absence of tendon healing is associated with poorer clinical and subjective results. Patients aged ≥ 55 years and patients with larger tears (stage 2 or higher) and/or muscle fatty infiltration (fatty infiltration index > 2) have significantly lower rates of healing. Surgeons should be aware that structurally failed cuff repair may also be associated with low-grade infection.

Posteroinferior relevant scapular neck offset in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: key player for motion and friction-type impingement in a computer model.

Range of motion (ROM) and prevention of notching remain a challenge for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Both may be affected by the morphology of the scapula. The purpose of this study was to define anteroinferior (a) and posteroinferior (p) relevant scapular neck offset (RSNO) and to examine the hypothesis that pRSNO is significantly smaller than aRSNO, and influences rigid body motion (RBM). Adapting glenosphere implantation strategies may therefore be of value. In this computer model study, we used deidentified computed tomographic scans of 22 patients (11 male and 11 female; mean age: 72.9 years) with massive cuff tears without joint space narrowing. Eight RSA glenoid configurations were tested with a constant neck-shaft angle (145°). Two baseplate types (25 mm; 25 + 3 mm lateralized) and 4 glenospheres (GS) (36 mm; 36 +2 mm of eccentricity; 39 mm; 39 + 3 mm) were used. RSNO was defined as the standardized measurement of the horizontal distance from the inferior extent of the GS to the bony margin of the scapula after baseplate positioning (flush to inferior glenoid extent; neutral position: 0° inclination and 0° version-both software computed). There was a highly significant difference between pRSNO and aRSNO for both genders (P<.001). pRSNO was always smaller than aRSNO. pRSNO was strongly correlated with external rotation (ERO: 0.84) and extension (EXT: 0.74) and moderately correlated with global ROM (GROM: 0.68). There was a moderately strong correlation between aRSNO and internal rotation (IRO: 0.69). pRSNO was strongly correlated with aRSNO, EXT, ERO, IRO, adduction (ADD) and GROM (0.82, 0.72, 0,8, 0.71, 0.82, 0.76) in female patients and with EXT and ERO (0.82, 0.89) in male patients. The median pRSNO allowing for at least 45° ERO and 40° EXT was 14.2 mm for men and 13.8 mm for women. For all patients and models, pRSNO ≥14 mm increased EXT, ERO, and GROM significantly compared with pRSNO <14 mm (P<.001). The combination of lateralization and inferior overhang (eccentricity) led to the most significant increase of pRSNO for each GS size (P<.001). This is one of the first RSA modeling studies evaluating nonarthritic glenoids of both genders. The lateral scapular extent to glenoid relationship is asymmetric. pRSNO is always smaller than aRSNO for both genders and was a critical variable for EXT and ERO, demonstrating additional strong correlation with aRSNO, IRO, ADD, and GROM in female patients. pRSNO ≥14 mm was a safe value to prevent friction-type impingement. Combining increased glenosphere size, lateralization, and inferior overhang gives the best results in this computer-simulated setting.

Results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs in patients with comorbid disability of other extremities

Objectives: We hypothesized that arthroscopic rotator cuff repair improves functional and clinical outcomes in the patients with comorbid disability in the extremities. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective study, data were collected for eleven patients (six males and five females) from a tertiary care hospital from 2010 to 2018. All the patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair after confirmed clinical and radiological diagnosis. All the patients were operated on by a single surgeon. UCLS scores and ultrasound imaging were used for pre-operative and post-operative clinical and radiological evaluation, respectively. The mean follow-up was of 3 years. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software and statistical significance was considered at P &lt; 0.05. Results: Out of 11 patients, seven patients had massive cuff tears, two patients had medium cuff tears, and two patients had small cuff tears. Out of 11 patients, three patients were contralateral side amputees, four patients were wheelchair-bound due to post-poliomyelitis muscle weakness, one patient had opposite side hand amputation, and three patients had same side hemiplegia secondary to cerebrovascular stroke. The dominant side was involved in eight patients and the non-dominant side was involved in three patients. Functional range of motion, the visual analog scale for pain, and satisfaction and UCLS scores improved significantly after arthroscopic cuff repairs. Ultrasound evaluation after a mean of 14 ± 3 months revealed complete healing in 88% of cases and partial healing in 12% of cases. Conclusion: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair improves functional and clinical outcomes in patients with comorbid disability in the extremities. Careful and meticulous clinical acumen, surgical planning, technique, and post-operative rehabilitation program are important for excellent outcomes in arthroscopic cuff repairs, especially in these functionally high-demanding patients.

Survivorship of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty According to Indication, Age and Gender.

Background. The indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been widely expanded, but only a few studies report the long-term survival of these implants. Our objective was to report the long-term survivorship of a large series of RSAs implanted for different etiologies. Methods. A retrospective multicenter study including all the RSAs was performed in six shoulder-specialized centers with at least 2 years of follow up. We reviewed 1611 RSAs, operated between 1993 and 2010, including 497 cuff-tear arthropathies (CTA), 239 revision RSAs, 188 massive cuff tears (MCT), 185 fracture sequelae (FS), 183 failed previous cuff repairs (FCR), and 142 primary osteoarthritis (POA). The mean follow-up was 5.6 ± 3.9 years (range 2–20). Results. Overall, 266 RSAs (16.5%) had at least one complication leading to 64 reoperations (4.0%) and 110 revision surgeries (6.8%). The most frequent complications were infection (3.8%), instability (2.8%), and humerus-related complications (2.8%). At 10 years, the survival without revision surgery was 91.0% in primary RSAs and 80.9% in revision RSAs for failed arthroplasty (p < 0.001). In the primary RSA group, MCT and FCR led to 10-year survivals for over 95% but fracture sequelae and tumors had the lowest 10-year survivals (83.9% and 53.1%). Younger patients had a lower 10-year survival. In revision RSAs, male patients had a significantly lower survival than females (72.3% vs. 84.5% at 10 years, p = 0.020). Discussion. Primary RSA for cuff-deficient shoulders or POA leads to a high 10-year survival, but revision RSA or primary RSA for FS and tumors are at high-risk for revision. Surgeons should be aware of high rates of complications and lower survival rates of RSA in younger patients, in males, and in RSAs for revision surgery.

Rotator cuff tears

Rotator cuff tears are most commonly the result of age-related degenerative pathology, although they can result from trauma at any age. Patients with rotator cuff tears (RCT) often present with pain, loss of strength and decreased range of motion, which significantly affects their function and quality of life. Some uncertainty persists about optimal treatment strategies and the timing of repairs for some RCTs. The incidence of rotator cuff repairs has rapidly increased in recent years, and studies show that the vast majority of patients go on to experience significant improvements in pain and function, although re-tear is a recognized complication. Novel strategies using grafts to augment repairs are being employed in the hope of reducing these re-tear rates. Augments are expensive and currently not fully supported by high-quality evidence demonstrating their efficacy. The management of larger, potentially irreparable cuff tears is challenging. It remains unclear whether surgery offers effective long-term results for most patients with large and massive cuff tears, as rotator cuff repairs for this cohort are associated with high failure rates.

The role of biodegradable spacer implantation under local anesthesia for patients with massive rotator cuff tears and significant medical comorbidities

Massive rotator cuff tears are common, and the incidence increases with age. They are a challenging problem to deal with as many are irreparable. While there are a host of surgical options available, these can be prolonged procedures requiring general anesthesia and thus not suitable for elderly patients or those with significant medical comorbidities. In this study, we evaluate the role of a biodegradable balloon inserted under local anesthetic for a series of patients with massive cuff tears and significant medical comorbidities. A prospective pilot study was performed on a series of patients between June 2018 and April 2019. Demographic data, as well as preoperative and postoperative clinical data including Subjective Shoulder Value and Oxford Shoulder Scores, were obtained. Four patients with magnetic resonance imaging-proven massive rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus were treated with an InSpace balloon under local anesthesia. All were of American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 4 and had exhausted nonoperative treatment. The mean Oxford Shoulder Score improved from a preoperative baseline of 17.25 (range 6-25) to a peak of 25.75 (range 15-34) at the 6-week postoperative mark before declining to 13.67 (range 6-23) at the final follow-up of 6 months. Subjective Shoulder Values also improved initially from a mean of 31.25 (range of 20-40) to a peak of 58.75 (range of 50-70) before reducing to 36.67 (range of 30-50) at the final follow-up of 6 months. We have described the safety and early benefit from the use of a biodegradable balloon spacer inserted under local anesthetic as a management option for patients with massive rotator cuff tears, who may be unfit for other extensive reconstruction options, particularly for short-term pain relief as significant long-term gains were not demonstrated.

AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria: Management of Rotator Cuff Pathology.

AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria: Management of Rotator Cuff Pathology.