Masker-signal Delay Research Articles

Frequency selectivity in the modulation domain estimated using forward masking: Effects of masker modulation depth and masker-signal delay

The threshold for detecting amplitude modulation (AM) of a sinusoidal or noise carrier is elevated when the signal AM is preceded by masker AM applied to the same carrier. This effect, called AM forward masking, shows selectivity in the AM domain, consistent with the existence of a modulation filter bank (MFB). In this paper we explore the effect of two factors that can influence AM forward masking, using an 8-kHz sinusoidal carrier and a range of masker AM frequencies, fm, both below and above the signal AM frequency, fs, of 40 Hz. The first factor was the time delay, td, between the end of the masker AM and the start of the signal AM. The second was the AM depth, m, of the masker, which was either 1 or 0.25. The AM forward masking patterns in all conditions showed tuning in the AM domain; signal thresholds were highest when fm was close to fs. The amount of AM forward masking decreased with increasing td in a similar way for all fm, so the shapes of the masking patterns did not change markedly with td. Remarkably, the amount of AM forward masking decreased by only about 3 dB (a non-significant effect) when the masker m was decreased from 1 to 0.25. This result appears to be inconsistent with an explanation of AM forward masking in terms of adaptation in a MFB or in terms of a sliding temporal integrator.

Forward masking of frequency modulation

Forward masking of sinusoidal frequency modulation (FM) was measured with three types of maskers: FM, amplitude modulation (AM), and a masker created by combining the magnitude spectrum of an FM tone with random component phases. For the signal FM rates used (5, 20, and 40 Hz), an FM masker raised detection thresholds in terms of frequency deviation by a factor of about 5 relative to without a masker. The AM masker produced a much smaller effect, suggesting that FM-to-AM conversion did not contribute substantially to the FM forward masking. The modulation depth of an FM masker had a nonmonotonic effect, with maximal masking observed at an intermediate value within the range of possible depths, while the random-phase FM masker produced less masking, arguing against a spectrally-based explanation for FM forward masking. Broad FM-rate selectivity for forward masking was observed for both 4-kHz and 500-Hz carriers. Thresholds measured as a function of the masker-signal delay showed slow recovery from FM forward masking, with residual masking for delays up to 500 ms. The FM forward-masking effect resembles that observed for AM [Wojtczak and Viemeister (2005). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 188, 3198-3210] and may reflect modulation-rate selective neural adaptation to FM.

Forward Masking of Dynamic Acoustic Intensity: Effects of Intensity Region and End-Level

Overestimation of loudness change typically occurs in response to up-ramp auditory stimuli (increasing intensity) relative to down-ramps (decreasing intensity) matched on frequency, duration, and end-level. In the experiment reported, forward masking is used to investigate a sensory component of up-ramp overestimation: persistence of excitation after stimulus presentation. White-noise and synthetic vowel 3.6 s up-ramp and down-ramp maskers were presented over two regions of intensity change (40-60 dB SPL, 60-80 dB SPL). Three participants detected 10 ms 1.5 kHz pure tone signals presented at masker-offset to signal-offset delays of 10, 20, 30, 50, 90, 170 ms. Masking magnitude was significantly greater in response to up-ramps compared with down-ramps for masker-signal delays up to and including 50 ms. When controlling for an end-level recency bias (40-60 dB SPL up-ramp vs 80-60 dB SPL down-ramp), the difference in masking magnitude between up-ramps and down-ramps was not significant at each masker-signal delay. Greater sensory persistence in response to up-ramps is argued to have minimal effect on perceptual overestimation of loudness change when response biases are controlled. An explanation based on sensory adaptation is discussed.

Forward Masking in the Amplitude-Modulation Domain for Tone Carriers: Psychophysical Results and Physiological Correlates

Wojtczak and Viemeister (J Acoust Soc Am 118:3198-3210, 2005) demonstrated forward masking in the amplitude-modulation (AM) domain. The present study examined whether this effect has correlates in physiological responses to AM at the level of the auditory midbrain. The human psychophysical experiment used 40-Hz, 100% AM (masker AM) that was imposed on a 5.5-kHz carrier during the first 150ms of its duration. The masker AM was followed by a 50-ms burst of AM of the same rate (signal AM) imposed on the same (uninterrupted) carrier, either immediately after the masker or with a delay. In the physiological experiment, single-unit extracellular recordings in the awake rabbit inferior colliculus (IC) were obtained for stimuli designed to be similar to the uninterrupted-carrier conditions used in the psychophysics. The masker AM was longer (500ms compared with 150ms in the psychophysical experiment), and the carrier and modulation rate were chosen based on each neuron's audio- and envelope-frequency selectivity. Based on the average discharge rates of the responses or on the temporal correlation between neural responses to masked and unmasked stimuli, only a small subset of the population of IC cells exhibited suppression of signal AM following the masker. In contrast, changes in the discharge rates between the temporal segments of the carrier immediately preceding the signal AM and during the signal AM varied as a function of masker-signal delay with a trend that matched the psychophysical results. Unless the physiological observations were caused by species differences, they suggest that stages of processing higher than the IC must be considered to account for the AM-processing time constants measured perceptually in humans.

Recovery from on- and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing

The aim of this study was to investigate the possible mechanisms underlying an effect reported earlier [Wojtczak, M., and Oxenham, A. J. (2009). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 270-281] in normal-hearing listeners, whereby recovery from forward masking can be slower for off-frequency tonal maskers than for on-frequency tonal maskers that produce the same amount of masking at a 0-ms masker-signal delay. To rule out potential effects of confusion between the tonal signal and tonal masker, one condition used a noise-band forward masker. To test whether the effect involved temporal build-up, another condition used a short-duration (30-ms) forward masker. To test whether the effect is dependent on normal cochlear function, conditions were tested in five listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. For the 150-ms noise maskers, the data from normal-hearing listeners replicated the findings from the previous study that used tonal maskers. In contrast, no significant difference in recovery from on- and off-frequency masking was observed for the 30-ms tonal maskers in normal-hearing listeners, or for the 150-ms tonal maskers in hearing-impaired listeners. Overall, the results are consistent with a mechanism based on efferent feedback that affects the recovery from forward masking in the normal auditory system.

Pitfalls in behavioral estimates of basilar-membrane compression in humans.

Psychoacoustic estimates of basilar-membrane compression often compare on- and off-frequency forward masking. Such estimates involve assuming that the recovery from forward masking for a given signal frequency is independent of masker frequency. To test this assumption, thresholds for a brief 4-kHz signal were measured as a function of masker-signal delay. Comparisons were made between on-frequency (4 kHz) and off-frequency (either 2.4 or 4.4 kHz) maskers, adjusted in level to produce the same amount of masking at a 0-ms delay between masker offset and signal onset. Consistent with the assumption, forward-masking recovery from a moderate-level (83 dB SPL) 2.4-kHz masker and a high-level (92 dB SPL) 4.4-kHz masker was the same as from the equivalent on-frequency maskers. In contrast, recovery from a high-level (92 dB SPL) 2.4-kHz forward masker was slower than from the equivalent on-frequency masker. The results were used to simulate temporal masking curves, taking into account the differences in on- and off-frequency masking recoveries at high levels. The predictions suggest that compression estimates assuming frequency-independent masking recovery may overestimate compression by as much as a factor of 2. The results suggest caution in interpreting forward-masking data in terms of basilar-membrane compression, particularly when high-level maskers are involved.

The effects of hearing loss on growth-of-masking functions for sinusoidal and complex-tone maskers with differing phase spectra

Growth-of-masking (GOM) functions in forward masking (0-ms masker-signal delay) were measured for normally hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) listeners using as maskers complex tones (harmonics 1–40, 100-Hz fundamental frequency) with components starting in cosine or random phase, and on-frequency sinusoids. The signal was a 20-ms sinusoid, usually with a frequency of 1 or 2 kHz. It is argued that differences in the slopes of the GOM functions for the random- and cosine-phase maskers provide a measure of the strength of compression in the cochlea. For the NH listeners and some of the HI listeners, the slopes were significantly greater for the random- than for the cosine-phase maskers, and for these listeners the slopes for the complex-tone maskers were less than for the sinusoidal maskers. For the remaining HI listeners, the slopes of the GOM functions were similar for all masker types. It is argued that these listeners had almost complete loss of cochlear compression. The GOM functions for the sinusoidal maskers had slopes between 0.45 and 0.78 and were typically in the range 0.6–0.7. The finding of slopes below one for listeners in whom cochlear compression was probably absent is not consistent with linear-integrator models of forward masking.

Effects of masker frequency and duration in forward masking: further evidence for the influence of peripheral nonlinearity

Forward masking has often been thought of in terms of neural adaptation, with nonlinearities in the growth and decay of forward masking being accounted for by the nonlinearities inherent in adaptation. In contrast, this study presents further evidence for the hypothesis that forward masking can be described as a linear process, once peripheral, mechanical nonlinearities are taken into account. The first experiment compares the growth of masking for on- and off-frequency maskers. Signal thresholds were measured as a function of masker level for three masker-signal intervals of 0, 10, and 30 ms. The brief 4-kHz sinusoidal signal was masked by a 200-ms sinusoidal forward masker which had a frequency of either 2.4 kHz (off-frequency) or 4 kHz (on-frequency). As in previous studies, for the on-frequency condition, the slope of the function relating signal threshold to masker level became shallower as the delay between the masker and signal was increased. In contrast, the slopes for the off-frequency condition were independent of masker-signal delay and had a value of around unity, indicating linear growth of masking for all masker-signal delays. In the second experiment, a broadband Gaussian noise forward masker was used to mask a brief 6-kHz sinusoidal signal. The spectrum level of the masker was either 0 or 40 dB (re: 20 μPa). The gap between the masker and signal was either 0 or 20 ms. Signal thresholds were measured for masker durations from 5 to 200 ms. The effect of masker duration was found to depend more on signal level than on gap duration or masker level. Overall, the results support the idea that forward masking can be modeled as a linear process, preceded by a static nonlinearity resembling that found on the basilar membrane.

Recovery from prior stimulation II: Effects upon intensity discrimination

We obtained just-noticeable differences (inds) for the intensity of pure tones following a forward masker. The masker was a 100-ms burst of narrow-band noise centered at 1000 Hz presented at 90 dB SPL; the pure-tone signal was at 1000 Hz and was 25 ms in duration. The masker-signal delay was 100 ms. Under these conditions, there is no threshold shift for the detection of the pure-tone signal following the forward masker. In contrast with the absence of a forward-masker effect upon detection thresholds, unusually large midlevel (40–60 dB SPL) jnds were observed. These large midlevel jnds were measured as a function of signal delay, revealing that they are not completely recovered to the normal (unmasked) values by 400 ms. We interpret these data as a consequence of the slower recovery of low-spontaneous rate, high-threshold neurons following prior stimulation (Relkin and Doucet, 1990). These experiments may therefore provide psychophysical evidence that the low-spontaneous rate, high-threshold neurons are a necessary physiological component in the coding of the large dynamic range for intensity. In addition, the present data provide evidence that the assumption that the effect of forward masking is limited to 100–200 ms is inappropriate, as this recovery time does not necessarily apply to suprathreshold tasks.

The development and decline of forward masking

Three experiments investigated the forward masking of brief sinusoids by bursts of noise for masker durations of between 5 and 320 ms and for masker-signal delays between 5 and 40 ms. Experiment 1 showed that, for a 2-kHz signal and a 5-ms delay, long-duration maskers produced much more masking than brief maskers of the same spectrum level. As masker-signal delay was increased, thresholds dropped more rapidly for long than for brief maskers, so that at a delay of 40 ms the difference between thresholds produced by long and by brief maskers was reduced. Experiment 2 showed that, for a 2-kHz signal, the transition from simultaneous masking to forward masking was accompanied by a large drop of about 23 dB in threshold. For a 250-Hz signal this large drop did not occur until masker-signal delay was increased from 10 to 20 ms. For shorter masker-signal delays, brief 250-Hz maskers produced thresholds higher than those produced by longer maskers. The results of Experiment 2 are consistent with the idea that ringing on the basilar membrane causes the responses to masker and signal to overlap for delay times up to 10 ms. Experiment 3 compared the recovery functions for 3 markers of different durations, where the masker levels were adjusted so that each produced equal masking of a 2-kHz signal at a delay of 5 ms. Brief intense maskers produced slower recovery than longer weaker ones. indicating that the recovery from a given amount of forward masking depends on how that masking developed. The implications of this finding for attempts to explain forward masking in terms of short-term adaptation are discussed.