Same-sex Marriage Research Articles

How free are classroom teachers? Understanding teacher academic freedom in the United States and Canada

ABSTRACT This paper presents the results of an international survey of teachers’ perspectives on academic freedom. We surveyed 173 social studies and science teachers from the United States and Canada about the importance of academic freedom, their comfort level broaching controversial topics in four broad areas (politics, economics, health and safety, and science), and the factors that influence their decision-making around discussing controversial topics. The study found that teachers value academic freedom despite being aware of how limited their freedom is in practice. Particularly controversial topics included safe injection sites, abortion, prisons, medically assisted dying, and same-sex marriage. Analysis via Mann-Whitney U tests was conducted to analyse whether teachers’ individual differences (e.g., experience, gender, or job status) influenced their pedagogical approach. Gender and years of experience had little influence, but teachers’ cautiousness was significantly influenced by whether they have tenure and the political climate of the area where they work.

Postoj studentů sociální pedagogiky k homoparentálním rodinám

The paper is focused on the research of the attitude of the students of the Bachelor's and Master's degree programmes in social pedagogy from the J. E. Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, University of Ostrava and Masaryk University in Brno (N = 107) towards the issue of homoparental families and in a broader context towards homosexuality as such. Furthermore, we also focus on the students' perspective on how the issue of homoparental families is reflected in the educational content of the subjects in their curriculum. An accessible type of research sampling was used. The author's questionnaire constructed on the principle of Likert scales was used as a research instrument. The questionnaire includes items aimed at identifying attitudes towards gay marriage, the causes of homosexuality, the upbringing of children by homoparental parents, and the space devoted to this topic in the university training of future social educators. The data obtained were processed using descriptive methods of statistical analysis and further analyzed. The findings show that a significant majority of the respondents are in favour of homosexual couples receiving the same rights as heterosexual couples, including the possibility of marriage. Furthermore, the majority of respondents appear to be in favour of the naturalness of homosexual couples raising children. From the answers we can conclude that the students interviewed consider homosexuality as natural as heterosexuality and their attitudes are mostly positive.

The Biggest Decision of Your Life(Time)? Examining the Politics of Married at First Sight

Lifetime’s “Married at First Sight” (MAFS) aired its seventeenth season in 2024, averaging 2.58 million viewers per weekly episode. In this paper, we ask, how does MAFS reflect and intervene in contemporary marriage politics, particularly regarding race, gender, class, and sexuality in the U.S.? To answer this question, we draw on scholarship about marriage as a political institution, and on reality TV as a window into contemporary socio-economic issues. Using interpretive, feminist methods of analysis, we find that MAFS reflects and intervenes in contemporary marriage politics by offering viewers a very traditional and exclusionary version of the institution at a time when it and everything else (reproductive rights and same-sex marriages, to name just two examples) is in flux. However, even as it attempts to offer a “balm” to all of this upheaval, in practice, the show’s “experimental results” offer something more complex, which both reflects the contemporary realities of marriage and attracts viewers.

Abstract 4125263: Influence of sexual orientation-related nondiscrimination laws on 30-year CVD risk among sexual minority and heterosexual adults

Introduction: Discriminatory policies are associated with worse mental health and substance use outcomes among sexual minority adults. Despite a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than heterosexual adults, there is limited evidence on structural determinants of cardiovascular health among sexual minority adults. Therefore, we examined whether changes in sexual orientation-related nondiscrimination laws were associated with 30-year CVD risk among sexual minority and heterosexual adults. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that changes in sexual orientation-related nondiscrimination laws would be more strongly associated with 30-year CVD risk among sexual minority adults relative to exclusively heterosexual adults. Methods: We used longitudinal data from Waves III (2001-2002), IV (2008-2009), and V (2016-2018) of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. We assessed changes in four state-level sexual orientation-related nondiscrimination laws (i.e., employment discrimination, same-sex marriage, hate crime statutes, and same-sex adoption) between Waves III and IV. Changes in sexual orientation-related nondiscrimination laws were categorized as unchanged (reference), improved, or worsened. We assessed 30-year CVD risk using the Framingham Risk Score at Wave V. We ran sex-stratified linear regression models adjusted for demographic factors to examine whether the association between change in nondiscrimination laws with 30-year CVD risk was moderated by sexual orientation (i.e., exclusively heterosexual, mostly heterosexual, homosexual/bisexual). Results: The sample included 3,827 participants with a mean age of 28.7 (±1.75) years, of whom 83.1% identified as exclusively heterosexual, 51% as female, and 15% as Black. Compared to heterosexual participants of the same sex, an improvement in nondiscrimination laws was associated with lower 30-year CVD risk among mostly heterosexual women (B -4.57, 95% CI = -8.06, -1.08) and homosexual/bisexual men (B -10.91, 95% CI = -19.33, -2.49). In contrast, compared to exclusively heterosexual women, a worsening of nondiscrimination laws was associated with higher 30-year CVD risk among homosexual/bisexual women (B 5.26, 95% CI = 0.30, 10.21). No differences were found between mostly heterosexual and exclusively heterosexual men. Conclusions: Findings suggest that efforts to enhance policies prohibiting sexual orientation-related discrimination may significantly reduce CVD risk among sexual minority adults.

LGBTQ+ Families, Welfare, and Same-sex Marriage Legalisation in Taiwan: A Social Policy Perspective

This article examines whether and to what extent legalised same-sex marriage can assist lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (LGBTQ+) people to develop family life and protect them from defamilisation and familisation risks. It focuses on the provision of and gaps in welfare for LGBTQ+ people since Taiwan’s same-sex marriage legalisation in 2019. A content analysis of online community discussions since marriage equality shows that local LGBTQ+ community discussions were filled with concerns about the lack of familial status for cross-border couples, lack of legal parental status and rights for same-sex parents, and questions about heteronormative values and kinship ties. This article reveals how heteronormative assumptions embedded in the policy system and in the wider society adversely influence LGBTQ+ people’s welfare, and identifies supplementary and alternative measures. It highlights the importance of providing universal basic services free from heteronormative biases and prioritising the well-being and rights of all citizens.

Pernikahan Sesama Jenis: Tinjauan Hak dan Kewajiban Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Perkawinan

In the context of Indonesian law, marriage is defined as a bond between a man and a woman, which explicitly closes the possibility of recognition of same-sex marriage. In the midst of international developments that increasingly recognize the rights of same-sex couples, Indonesia still maintains a conservaative view influenced by religious and social norms. This study aims to analyze Indonesia’s Law No. 16 of 2019 on Marriage in the context of the rights and obligations of married couples and whether there is potential recognition for same-sex marriage in Indonesia. The law defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, excluding the possibility of recognizing same-sex marriages. The study employs normative legal research with legislative and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that provisions such as the minimum age for marriage, dispensation, and marriage authorization are only applicable to heterosexual couples. The rights established in the law, including protection from violence and access to healthcare, do not cover same-sex couples due to the absence of legal recognition. The conclusion emphasizes the existing inequality in access to civil rights in Indonesia, particularly for the LGBT community. While challenges remain from conservative social and religious norms, discussions on potential future revisions to marriage law remain open, particularly within the framework of equality and non-discrimination.

Mind the Gap! LGBTQ + Population’s Perceptions of Discrimination and of Legal Innovation

Abstract Introduction Homosexuality was decriminalized in Portugal in 1982, and several legislative changes have emerged since the beginning of the twenty-first century. However, 2010 marked the beginning of the approval of fundamental laws for the life of LGBTQ + people, such as same-sex marriage, access to parenthood and the right to self-determination of gender identity. Despite these advances, discrimination is still present in Portuguese society. Methods The aim of this investigation is to study the processes and experiences of discrimination of LGBTQ + people in their daily lives, analyzing the perception of the discrepancy between legislation and the experiences of participants. Its aim is also to analyze the strategies suggested by the participants to reduce this discrepancy. To this end, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 LGBTQ + participants, of various sexual orientations (six gay men, three lesbian women, six bisexual persons, five pansexual individuals, and one who identified as “other”) and gender identities (six transgender participants, including two trans men, two non-binary persons, one trans woman, and one genderqueer participant). Results Content analysis of these interviews resulted in 828 units of analysis coded in 30 categories. The participants reported that they have gone through multiple experiences of discrimination in different contexts and that they recognize forces of resistance to legal innovation. Conclusion There is a gap between legal advances and the experiences of LGBTQ+ people in Portugal, who still report discrimination experiences in many domains of daily life. Policy Implications Implications for research and public policies are presented, particularly considering the need to inform and provide training to both strategic audiences and stakeholders and to inform the larger population to promote social change.

QUEER OPPORTUNISM: STATE, MEDIA, AND LGBT+ RIGHTS IN THE CONTEXT OF THAI BOYS LOVE (BL) SERIES INDUSTRY

Relations of appropriation of the image and agenda of minority groups have been increasingly frequent at different levels and contexts. This would be no different with the LGBT+ population, and was reflected in the Thai government’s support for the BL industry and their little to no attention to LGBT+ issues, especially marriage equality. Drawing on ethnographic research among BL series fans on Twitter and Telegram for nine months (between June 2021 and February 2022) and discussions about politics and media, pink money and pinkwashing, and homonationalism, I will introduce the concept of queer opportunism to name a contradictory relationship between state institutions or any others and the LGBT+ agenda based on fan discourses and the Thai state’s stance on the BL industry.

Effect of same-sex marriage legalisation on the health of ethnic minority lesbian, gay and bisexual people: a quasi-experimental study

BackgroundThe UK legalised same-sex marriage in 2014. We examine whether same-sex marriage legalisation (SSML), an exogenous policy change, affected the health outcomes among ethnic minority lesbian, gay, bisexual and other...

Whose Egg, Whose Sperm, Whose Household Registration? Reproductive Decisionmaking Among LGBT Parents in China

This article examines how LGBT individuals and couples in China make reproductive decisions in a sociopolitical context characterized by homophobia and an absence of LGBT familial rights and legal recognition. The existing literature on LGBTQ+ childbearing and family formation, based primarily in Euro-American countries, tends to focus on the central role of same-sex marriage legalization and features marriage as the core intimate bond that bestows parental and other familial rights. This article argues that China’s household registration (hukou) system is an equally, if not more, salient regulatory system that determines daily life opportunities, access to state-subsidized schooling and health care, life-long social welfare, and placement in a hierarchy of urban versus rural citizenship. LGBT intending parents in China make reproductive decisions with a child’s hukou in mind, treating genetic contributions, gestational labor, and legal parental status as flexible resources to achieve desired hukou outcomes. The hukou system encourages reproductive strategies that make and unmake LGBT kinship, securing family bonds that otherwise lack legal and social recognition while potentially risking parental precarity. The article suggests new directions for LGBT rights advocacy by focusing on the governing systems and statuses that determine access to key citizenship resources and family rights.

The discursive construction of tradition and modernity in counter-homophobic discourses in China

ABSTRACT This study investigates the counter-homophobic discursive construction of tradition and modernity in China, focusing on Sina Weibo users’ comments on anti-same-sex marriage arguments. The study reveals how proponents of same-sex marriage in China actively imagine and project a China that is inclusive of gay rights by (re)constructing China’s tradition as tolerant of homosexuality and positioning China’s pursuit of development and modernity as entailing gay rights development. Yet, analysis shows that the discursive construction of tradition may potentially romanticize China’s tradition as if it were devoid of homophobia, and the discursive construction of modernity, by representing China’s gay rights development as merely playing catch-up with the purportedly already modernized West, sometimes implicitly produces a homonationalist binary of modernism versus traditionalism. However, from a postcolonial transnational perspective, the paper argues that contrary to the homocolonialist representation of China as essentially homophobic, these discursive practices may work partially to confront and contest Western exceptionalism.

A closer look at the demographics of same-sex marriage in the United States: Implications for research, practice, and policy.

In 2015, the United States Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, setting in motion a sweeping social change for sexual minority people and their romantic relationships. The United States Census Bureau collects demographic data on same-sex couple households, offering an opportunity to better understand the demographic makeup of same-sex marriage today. This knowledge is essential for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers who aim to understand and support same-sex couples' relationships. We used national probability data from the American Community Survey collected in 2021 (the most recent year these data are available) on married and unmarried, cohabiting same-sex and opposite-sex households. Respondents reported their own age, race, ethnicity, education, employment, income, home ownership, and whether they had children living with them in their household. Differences between married and unmarried opposite-sex couples were observed in race, ethnicity, age, and socioeconomic status, consistent with prior research. Many of these demographic gaps also existed for same-sex couples, although these were often smaller. Several of these differences further varied between male and female same-sex couples. Same-sex married couples appear to be more demographically diverse than opposite-sex married couples. However, like opposite-sex couples, same-sex couples from multiple minoritized groups were less likely to be married. Future research is needed to understand drivers of these differences (e.g., different attitudes about marriage or lack of access to marriage) and their impact. Policymakers and clinicians will need to bear these group differences in mind when designing policy and delivering services to support the well-being of sexual minority couples.

“Love the sin, hate the sinner”: Attitudes Towards Sexuality Among Mainline and Evangelical Protestants in the USA

Abstract Introduction Attitudes towards gay and lesbian people and same-sex marriage remain a contentious issue within Evangelical Protestantism. Methods We use data from the Sexuality version of the Implicit Association Test from the Project Implicit website (n = 180,554) between 2006 and 2016. We investigate the attitudes of Atheists, Mainline Protestants and Evangelical Protestants towards gay and lesbian people and same-sex marriage. Results In an inversion of the typical mantra, Evangelical Protestant participants appear to “love the sin, hate the sinner,” with relatively high levels of approval for same-sex marriage combined with significant negative associations with gay and lesbian people. Further, we find significant differences between Mainline and Evangelical Protestants who are also gay, lesbian or bisexual compared to those who are heterosexual. Conclusions We discuss the cognitive dissonance between compassionate Christianity (“love thy neighbour”) and negative associations towards gay and lesbian people and the intersections of religious and sexual identities. Policy Implications. Results suggest that among Evangelical Protestants same-sex marriage is supported by a sizeable minority (40 + %). Efforts to improve attitudes towards same-sex marriage should focus on attempts to generate further improvements in attitudes among conservative Christians.

Legalization of LGBT Marriage: Case Study from Vietnam

LGBT marriage is a legal union between two individuals of the same sex, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. This type of marriage recognizes the equal rights of all people to marry regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. In Vietnam, the legal status of LGBT marriage has been the subject of considerable discussion and debate. Although the country has made significant strides in improving the rights of LGBT people, there is still a lack of official legal recognition for same-sex marriage. To date, same-sex marriage has not been explicitly legalized nor fully protected under Vietnamese law. This means that although same-sex marriages are not criminalized, and people have their free will to live together and hold ceremonies, yet these marriages do not hold the same legal status and rights as compared to heterosexual marriages. Vietnam has a strong cultural background and conservative beliefs; these play a crucial role in society in respect to the views within it when it comes to LGBT individuals. Society is becoming more tolerant; however, the LGBT community members are still judged with a high rate of discrimination. Although acceptance still significantly varies between regions and different age groups, public opinion is indeed softening, especially among the young. Due to the legal recognition, LGBT marriages provided them with equal legal rights and responsibilities concerning property, inheritance, adoption, and healthcare, just like heterosexual couples. On the other hand, this also can be regarded as another critical step to social inclusion and the fight against discrimination. This research will discuss the current situation of same-sex marriage in contemporary Vietnam with the aim of completing the picture of the LGBT community. The research study will also interview 22 LGBT individuals and a survey of close to 200 participants.

HINDERING POLICY CHANGE: Under What Conditions Have Marriage Equality Policies Been Hampered in Latin America?

Since 1993, over a hundred bills have been submitted to National Congresses in Latin America, proposing a shift from restrictive to permissive marriage equality or same sex partnerships regulations. Only five of 19 countries have approved legal changes, and five have done so in courts. Extant research has focused on the explanatory factors of the positive policy changes, but few studies have examined cases of hampered policies. This article aims to identify under what conditions marriage equality, as a moral policy, has stalled in Latin America. It contributes to our understanding of policy non-decisions by offering a cross-national analysis and overcoming the limitations of “mirror” strategies that explain negative cases solely by the absence of factors associated with positive change. It highlights the importance of studying conditions conjunctionally. High levels of religiosity can significantly influence political decisions and may obfuscate religious cleavages, as left-wing parties also engage in moral discourse.

Structural Stigma and Disparities in Long-Term Health Conditions Among Australians in Same-Sex Relationships: 2021 Australian Census.

Objectives. To explore the extent to which structural stigma (sociocultural and institutional constraining factors) is associated with sexual orientation disparities in long-term health conditions. Methods. We measured structural stigma using the regional percentage of votes against same-sex marriage from Australia's 2017 Marriage Equality Survey and mapped this to the 2021 Census survey of 10 093 399 and 136 988 individuals in different-sex and same-sex relationships, respectively. Controlling for individual and area-level confounders, we used logistic regression analyses to examine the association between quartiles of structural stigma and sexual orientation disparities in long-term health conditions (e.g., any, mental health, asthma, cardiovascular). Results. In the lowest stigma quartile, individuals in same-sex relationships had 56% higher odds of reporting any long-term health condition (odds ratio [OR] = 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.53, 1.59) and this increased to 63% in the highest stigma quartile (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 1.58, 1.68). Effects were particularly pronounced for cardiovascular, respiratory, and mental health conditions as well as for men, younger populations, and those living in socioeconomically deprived regions. Conclusions. Living in stigmatizing environments may have deleterious health effects for sexual minorities in Australia. Policy action and enhanced protections for sexual minorities are urgently required. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(10):1110-1122. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307759).

Relying on Human Rights Treaties to establish access to Same-sex registered Partnerships and Marriage – Confronting the Question of Cultural Sensitivities

This piece sets out to compare the stance of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) under the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR) with that of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) (known as Strasbourg Court) adjudicating on the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in relation to family rights of same-sex couples. Specifically, it looks at the stances taken by the two Courts towards same-sex relationship formalisations – registered partnerships and marriage – exploring their responses to the stances taken in the states within their jurisdiction towards such formalisations. This article confronts and compares the stances taken by the two Courts, and their underlying bases, when they encounter the varying stances on this controversial issue taken in the states in question, relating to cultural predilections. The article concludes that reliance on finding a consensus among the contracting states in this context has had a detrimental impact on the Strasbourg jurisprudence in terms of upholding the principle of non-discrimination, an impact that can be traced to discriminatory stances taken in a number of the ECHR-contracting states towards same-sex unions. It finds in contrast that the Inter-American Court of Human Rights has not accepted that finding such a consensus should affect its decisions in this context, and therefore it has not allowed cultural acceptance of homophobia to affect its stance. Keywords: ACHR; ECHR; ECtHR; IACtHR; Same-sex marriage; Strasbourg Court

African Initiated Churches and Gender Equality: Interpreting the concept of wife submission in the context of marital equality in Zimbabwe

African Initiated Churches and Gender Equality: Interpreting the concept of wife submission in the context of marital equality in Zimbabwe

The Introduction of Same-Sex Marriage in Germany—A Question of Conscience and/or Faith? A Case Study

On 30 June 2017, the German Bundestag voted in favor of the introduction of marriage for same-sex couples—a historic moment. Only a few days earlier, the then Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel had released the vote as a decision of conscience and thus dissolved the usual underlying factional compulsion—does this mean that rights for homosexual people are a question of personal conscience and values? Such a localization arouses the interest of religious studies to investigate how the discourse actors from the fields of politics, church and society formulate the decision of conscience as a discursive strategy in the negotiation process of same-sex marriage in Germany argumentatively and which positionings as well as descriptions of others and themselves are derived from this. The starting point is a modernity in which the actors move, understand and articulate themselves. This understanding of modernity is based on the process of a vertical transfer (Gladigow) of sociological theories of religion, among others, whereby narratives of secularization, overcoming religion (as a necessary precondition of modernity) and narratives of an opposition of religious vs. secular or religious vs. homosexual reappear as positions and arguments in the discourse. Using the approach of discursive religious studies (von Stuckrad) in conjunction with sociological discourse analysis (Keller), these processes of positioning, demarcation and negotiation based on the premises of modernity will be analyzed for the period from 2013 to 2017 on the basis of the public debate on religious, political, and social actors in Germany.

Abstract A126: Cancer screening trends in Louisiana’s sexual gender minority population

Abstract Cancer screenings in Louisiana (LA) have been consistently lower than the national average. Sexual and gender minorities (SGM) are more likely to be non-compliant with cancer screening guidelines and consistently do not meet cancer screening recommendations. This study compares compliance to cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines over time between SGM and the non-SGM population in LA. Data were obtained from the LA 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, and 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The sample was divided into gay (including lesbian, gay, bisexual, or other sexual orientation other than straight) and straight. Three primary outcomes of interest were used to measure breast, cervical, and CRC cancer screening adherence based on the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) screening recommendation at the time of each survey. Descriptive analysis and chi-square tests were conducted using sample weights. CRC had the lowest compliance rate in the entire population and across sexual orientation groups. Twenty-five percent of both populations had never received any CRC screening test. Comparatively, 3.6% of straight and 5.3% of gay populations had never received a mammogram while 6.6% of straight and 13.6% of the population had never received a pap smear. Significant improvements in compliance to breast, cervical, and CRC cancer screenings guidelines was observed among those who identified as straight over the survey years until 2020. Decreases in screening compliance were observed in this population from 2020 to 2022, likely due to the effects of the COVID pandemic. Screening compliance in those who identified as gay showed more variation over time in all three cancers. Screening compliance for CRC and cervical cancer were at its highest in 2016, declined to its lowest point in 2020, but increased in 2022. In 2016, there was a significant decline in breast cancer screening compliance in this population to the lowest ever observed in both groups. The initial increases in colorectal and cervical cancer screening observed from 2014 to 2016 among the gay population may be attributed to significant decreases in uninsured rates following the passage of the Affordable Care Act. Additionally, this population saw increased access to the private insurance market following the Obergefell decision and the Marriage Equality Act of 2015, which extended employer-sponsored coverage to same-sex couples. While breast cancer screenings declined from 2014-2016 in the gay population, there was a sharp increase from 2016 to 2018, which aligns with the 2016 expansion of Medicaid in Louisiana. Despite increases in access to insurance coverage, SGM individuals report being in fair or poor health and having negative experiences with healthcare providers at higher rates than their non-SGM counterparts. More research is needed to understand the healthcare landscape and experiences of SGM Louisianans. This will help to inform targeted interventions to increase screenings and improve cancer outcomes among this population. Citation Format: Bilikisu Elewonibi, Carleigh Baudoin, Ashely Fenton. Cancer screening trends in Louisiana’s sexual gender minority population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 17th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2024 Sep 21-24; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024;33(9 Suppl):Abstract nr A126.