Marker Of Acute Allograft Rejection Research Articles

REG3α is a novel biomarker that potentially correlates with acute allograft rejection after intestinal transplantation.

Monitoring of intestinal allograft function remains a challenge. While frequent endoscopies and biopsies are the gold standard, no single biomarker exists to screen for intestinal transplant rejection. The novel REG3α, an antimicrobial peptide secreted by intestinal enterocytes and Paneth cells, has been associated with inflammatory bowel disease as well as intestinal graft versus host disease. Our aim was to identify and describe a role of REG3α in monitoring or predicting acute allograft rejection after intestinal transplantation (ITx). Since 2019, we have incorporated REG3α into the standard monitoring of patients after ITx. We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained IRB-approved database and present, herein, the results of 2 adults with irreversible intestinal failure who underwent isolated ITx under this monitoring protocol. Increases in REG3α corresponded with acute allograft rejection in both cases and preceded acute allograft rejection by 1week in one of the cases. We describe REG3α as a non-invasive marker of acute allograft rejection after adult isolated ITx which not only corresponded with acute allograft rejection but also preceded histopathological changes by 1week.

Liver stiffness in the early post-liver transplant phase as a marker of acute allograft rejection

Introduction: Acute allograft rejection remains a relevant post-operative complication after liver transplantation. Diagnosis of acute rejection is today based on clinical, laboratory and histopathological criteria. A prompt diagnosis of rejection is crucial.

Role of Soluble ST2 as a Marker for Rejection after Heart Transplant.

Background and ObjectivesEndomyocardial biopsy is obligatory during the first year after heart transplant (HTx) for the surveillance of acute rejection. Previous attempts using cardiac biomarkers for the detection of rejection failed to show enough evidence to substitute endomyocardial biopsy. Therefore, this study sought the possibility of using soluble ST2 (sST2), a novel cardiovascular marker, as a surrogate marker for acute allograft rejection after HTx.Subjects and MethodsA total of 494 blood samples acquired at the time of endomyocardial biopsy were analyzed in 67 HTx cases from September 2006 to August 2014. Significant rejection was defined as International Society of Heart and Lung Transplant (ISHLT) score ≥2R and humoral rejection accompanied by hemodynamic instability.ResultsTwenty cases of HTx with 22 blood samples showed significant rejection in endomyocardial biopsy at 4.0 (2.0-9.0) months after HTx. The level of sST2 showed positive correlation with cardiac troponin I, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (all p<0.001), and negative correlation with post-HTx months (p<0.001). The levels of sST2 according to the ISHLT scores were 36 (19-98), 28 (18-62), 15 (16-37), and 191 (85-343) ng/mL, consecutively 0R, 1R, 2R, and 3R+ (3R plus hemodynamically-unstable humoral rejection) (p=0.003). However, when we studied within-subject effects of sST2 using a mixed model, the sST2 level according to the predefined time point was not different according to the presence of significant rejection (p for interaction=0.94).ConclusionAlthough sST2 is known as a promising predictor for cardiovascular events, its role in HTx patients to predict acute allograft rejection seems to be limited.

Lipocalin-2 in Serum Samples of Recipients Following Liver Transplantation as Predictive and Monitoring Marker for Acute Allograft Rejection

Lipocalin-2 in Serum Samples of Recipients Following Liver Transplantation as Predictive and Monitoring Marker for Acute Allograft Rejection

Microparticles in physiological and in pathological conditions

Chronic diseases pose a severe burden to modern National Health Systems. Individuals nowadays have a far more extended lifespan than in the past, but healthy living was only scantily extended. As much as longer life is desirable, it is saddened by chronic diseases and organ malfunctions. One contributor to these problems was recognized to be represented by microparticles (MPs). Our purpose is to better understand MPs, to contrast their ominous threat and possible clinical importance. For this intent we correlated MPs with thrombotic pathologies, hemophilia, malaria, diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, endothelial dysfunctions, pulmonary hypertension, ischemic stroke, pre-eclampsia, rheumatologic diseases-rheumatoid arthritis, polymyositis-dermatomyositis, angiogenesis and tumor progression-cancer; we listed the possibilities of using them to improve transfusion methods, as a marker for acute allograft rejection, in stem cell transplantation, as neuronal biomarkers, to understand gender-specific susceptibility for diseases and to improve vaccination methods and we presented some methods for the detection of MPs.

Biomarkers of Rejection: Are We Any Closer to the Philosopher’s Stone?

Biomarkers of Rejection: Are We Any Closer to the Philosopher’s Stone?

Endothelial Cell Activation Contributes to the Release of Procoagulant Microparticles During Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejection

Circulating procoagulant microparticles are reliable markers of vascular damage. The microparticle phenotypes provide additional information reflecting the nature of cell injury. This study assessed procoagulant microparticle levels and phenotypes in the diagnosis of acute allograft rejection after heart transplantation. Microparticles were prospectively investigated in the venous blood of 64 heart transplant patients, 23 with allograft rejection mainly of low score, and 41 without a rejection episode. Plasma concentrations of cytokines, cytoadhesins, and platelet activation markers were determined. By univariate analysis, the mean time elapsed from heart transplant, cold ischemia time, E-selectin-, Fas- and tissue factor-bearing microparticles were associated with allograft rejection. By multivariate analysis, E-selectin-microparticle levels appeared independently associated with allograft rejection, even when other significant variables were included in the model (odds ratio, 9.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.36-71.4; p = 0.023). The pattern of procoagulant microparticles released during acute allograft rejection suggests endothelial cell activation and Fas-mediated apoptosis. E-selectin-bearing microparticles appeared as an independent marker of acute allograft rejection that was still informative after adjustment for graft characteristics.

Prediction of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection by Urinary Monokine Induced by IFN-γ (MIG)

Early diagnosis of acute allograft rejection (AR) is still decisive for long-term renal allograft survival. The aim of this study was to define the role of the chemokine monokine induced by IFN-gamma (MIG) (CXCL9) and IFN-gamma-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) (CXCL10) as early markers of AR in renal transplantation (NTX). In a prospective study, 69 de novo renal transplant recipients were monitored and urine samples were collected after NTX for a median of 29 d. In pH-adjusted urine, MIG and IP-10 were determined by modified ELISA. AR was clinically diagnosed in 15 of 69 recipients and confirmed by biopsy in 14 of 15 AR patients (Banff classification). Corresponding to CXCR3-positive infiltrates in renal tissue, urinary MIG was elevated in 14 of 15 AR patients with a median of 2809 pg/ml (quartile 25% and 75% = 870 and 13,000; n = 15), being significantly (P < 0.0001) different from both nonrejecting allograft patients (NO-AR) (median, 25%, and 75%: 96, 1.0, and 161, n = 54) and healthy controls (median, 25%, and 75%: 144, 19, and 208, n = 13). Urinary MIG predicted AR with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 89%. In AR and NO-AR groups, MIG values correlated well with IP-10 (P < 0.001). MIG values indicated both imminent rejection and response to successful antirejection therapy. MIG was not related to intercurrent infections or other causes for impairment of renal function. In a multivariate analysis, MIG correlated best (P < 0.001) with AR from all AR-associated parameters. In conclusion, urinary MIG serves as a very sensitive and specific predictor for AR, mirrors response to antirejection therapy, and thus may contribute to improved long-term renal allograft survival.

EARLY ALLOGRAFT REJECTION IN CHILDREN AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH PERIPHERAL AND GRAFT EOSINOPHILIA

31 Acute allograft rejection in children after liver transplantation has still been a major problem in post transplant care despite improved immunosuppression. In adult patients marked elevation of peripheral eosinophils has been reported during acute rejection after solid organ transplantation. There have been no data reported about the role of eosinophils in children after liver transplantation. We have previously reported an increased expression of TH2-cytokines, especially interleukin-5, the major activator of eosinophils during allograft rejection. We therefore examined prospectively the number of peripheral eosinophils in 28 children after liver transplantation during the first 2-4 weeks post transplant in 1-2 days intervals (18 children transplanted between 1993 and 1994 at the California Pacific Medical Center and 10 children, transplanted between 1995 and 1998 at the University of Munich). The data were grouped according to clinical and histological observations in 4 groups: no rejection, early rejection, ongoing rejection, infection. All rejection episodes were proved by liver histology and results were correlated with the relative number of eosinophils within the periportal infiltrates during rejection. Early rejection was defined as 2 days prior to biopsy proven rejection. Results: 388 consecutive differential blood counts were analyzed during an average period of 21 days after transplant. (Table)TableAcute allograft rejection was associated with peripheral eosinophilia in 87%. Peripheral eosinophil numbers raised prior to GGT and bilirubin in 87% of rejection episodes. 22 of 24 liver biopsies with histological signs of allograft rejection showed a marked increase of eosinophils within the sites of inflammation. After treating rejection episodes with steroids eosinophil numbers decreased in all cases. In conclusion: Peripheral and intragraft eosinophilia might be a sensitive and specific additional marker for acute allograft rejection. Our results support the theory of an alternate pathway of liver allograft rejection including TH2-cytokines (IL-5) and eosinophils which might be not sufficiently suppressed by cyclosporine or tacrolimus.

Monitoring eosinophil activation and liver function after liver transplantation.

Portal tract eosinophil infiltration and an increase in the blood eosinophil count (EOS) have been shown to be specific markers of liver allograft rejection. The graft eosinophil infiltration is associated with the local release of eosinophil cationic protein. Therefore, serum eosinophil cationic protein concentration (ECP) is a potential marker for acute allograft rejection. We investigated the chronological relationship among and diagnostic value of serial changes in EOS, ECP, and liver function tests (LFTs) following liver transplantation. EOS, ECP, serum alpha-glutathione S-transferase concentration, and conventional LFTs were measured in serial samples collected over the first 3 postoperative months following 58 liver transplants. The diagnostic potential of each test, alone or in combination, was reviewed over the entire follow-up period. EOS and ECP increased at a median period of 3.5 and 4 days, respectively, before the diagnosis of acute rejection, and this increase was significantly earlier than the corresponding changes in LFTs (P<0.05). There was a significant correlation between the day of the first increase in EOS and alpha-glutathione S-transferase (rs=0.535; P=0.009) and EOS and alanine transaminase (rs=0.629; P=0.004). The optimum combination of tests for the diagnosis of acute rejection was an increase in both EOS and GST with a predictive efficiency of 84%. Increases in EOS and ECP are early indicators of acute liver allograft rejection and precede evidence of hepatocellular damage. However, an increase in ECP was also frequently associated with infection. Therefore, we recommend the regular monitoring of EOS in conjunction with routine LFTs after liver transplantation as an aid to the early diagnosis of acute rejection.

Inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase ameliorates functional and histological changes of acute lung allograft rejection.

We recently demonstrated that inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) ameliorated severe acute lung allograft rejection. This study used a rat lung transplant model to determine (1) the time course and cellular localization of iNOS expression during the histological progression of unmodified acute rejection and (2) whether inhibition of iNOS prevented impaired gas exchange function of the allograft lung and/or ameliorated the histological changes of acute rejection. iNOS mRNA and enzyme activity were expressed in allograft lungs during mild, moderate, and severe acute rejection, but not in normal, isograft, or allograft lungs before histological changes of mild acute rejection. iNOS expression in allografts resulted in elevated serum nitrite/nitrate levels, indicative of increased in vivo nitric oxide (NO) production. In situ hybridization demonstrated iNOS mRNA expression in infiltrating inflammatory cells, but not in allograft parenchymal cells. Allografts had significantly impaired gas exchange, which was prevented with the selective iNOS inhibitor aminoguanidine (PaO2 of 566+/-19, 76+/-22, and 504+/-105 mmHg for isograft, allograft, and aminoguanidine-treated allograft, respectively; P<0.0002). Aminoguanidine also significantly improved the histological rejection scores. (1) iNOS expression and increased NO production occurred during the early stages of acute rejection, persisted throughout the unmodified rejection process, and localized to infiltrating inflammatory cells, but not allograft parenchymal cells; (2) aminoguanidine ameliorated the histological and functional changes of acute rejection; and (3) increased NO production, detected by the presence of iNOS mRNA, protein, or noninvasively by measuring serum nitrite/nitrate levels, may serve as an early marker of acute allograft rejection.

Soluble tumor necrosis factor-receptors are not a useful marker of acute allograft rejection: a study in patients with renal or cardiac allografts.

In this study, we investigated soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (sTNF-R) levels in plasma of patients with either a kidney or cardiac allograft when clinical suspicion of acute rejection was raised. In plasma of patients with acute renal graft rejection, the sTNF-R levels were strongly enhanced (20-150 ng/ml) as compared to plasma of patients with stable renal function. Following successful treatment of the rejection, a gradual decline in sTNF-R levels occurred with improving renal function, and an inverse correlation between creatinine clearance and sTNF-R was found. To determine whether the increase was caused by an accumulation of constitutively released sTNF-R and lack of clearance by the kidney, or whether the immunological process of the rejection caused the enhancement, we measured sTNF-R in patients suffering from acute cardiac graft rejection but with predominantly stable kidney function. Rejection of a cardiac graft did not lead to a significant enhancement of sTNF-R levels. However, treatment with ATG or OKT3 did cause enhanced sTNF-R levels, followed by a decline that reached starting values after 7 days. These results provide evidence that the immune reaction that occurs during rejection of a graft does not per se induce discernible changes in sTNF-R levels, whereas that induced by ATG or OKT3 does. Thus, sTNF-R levels are not reliable marker in transplant recipient monitoring.

Soluble tumor necrosis factor-receptors are not a useful marker of acute allograft rejection: a study in patients with renal or cardiac allografts

Soluble tumor necrosis factor-receptors are not a useful marker of acute allograft rejection: a study in patients with renal or cardiac allografts

Sensitivity of CsA-activated uman lymphocytes as marker of acute allograft rejection after cardiac transplantation

Sensitivity of CsA-activated uman lymphocytes as marker of acute allograft rejection after cardiac transplantation

NITRIC OXIDE GENERATION

The L-arginine:nitric oxide (NO) biosynthetic pathway has been proposed as an important mediator in host defense mechanisms and may therefore play a role in the acute allograft response. We have studied NO generation in liver allograft rejection and determined its value in immunological monitoring. Stable end products of this pathway have been determined serially in 50 primary liver recipients and compared with 2 known mediators and markers of acute allograft rejection (IL-2R positive lymphocytes and circulating TNF alpha). Plasma concentrations of acid-labile nitrosocompounds (NOx), which increased during acute allograft rejection (P < 0.0001), correlated with rejection severity and were reduced after administration of supplemental high dose glucocorticoids. Concentrations were significantly lower in nonrejection graft complications but were elevated during episodes of sepsis. Correlations between plasma NOx levels and circulating TNF-alpha (r = 0.451, P < 0.001) and IL-2R-positive lymphocytes in peripheral blood (r = 0.781, P < 0.001) were demonstrated. In a logistic analysis of these variables, plasma NOx was the most predictive parameter of an episode of acute cellular rejection. Nitric oxide generation in FK506-treated patients was lower compared with patients receiving a CsA-based immunosuppression regimen and was associated with a reduced frequency of acute rejection in the FK506 group. These data are consistent with a role for NO in the cellular alloantigen immune response and indicate that monitoring of plasma levels of NOx may be useful in the detection of acute allograft rejection.

Serum hippuric acid concentration in renal allograft rejection, ureter obstruction, and tubular necrosis

Abstract Plasma from 35 renal allograft recipients (21 males and 14 females) was sampled daily and analyzed for hippuric acid (HA) by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and serum creatinine. Twelve of these patients experienced an acute renal allograft rejection or a ureter obstruction as proven by clinical signs and biopsy, as well as by radiography or ultrasound, respectively. Two patients suffered from tubular necrosis followed by rejection during the postoperative period. Mean serum HA increased by 39.9 μmol/1 from baseline (range 20.4–115.5 μmol/1) in patients with acute rejection 3 days after an initial increase that was observed 24 h before the mean serum creatinine increased by 107.1 μmol/1 (range 21–193 μmol/1). In cases of ureter obstruction, HA rose by 1.6 μmol/1 (range 1–8.2 μmol/1), significantly less than elevations due to rejection. The increase in creatinine, however, amounted to 65.3 μmol/1 (range 22–140 μmol/1) and was not different from the change in rejecting patients. Successful antirejection treatment coincided with a decrease in serum HA starting 24 h earlier than the decrease in the serum creatinine concentration. Of special interest was the observation of a parallel decrease in HA with creatinine concentration in patients with tubular necrosis after allotransplantation; HA increased in cases of an additional rejection. Our data suggest that HA, which is excreted by tubular secretion and glomerular filtration, could be a sensitive and early marker of acute allograft rejection. Furthermore, it seems to discriminate between acute renal allograft rejection and ureter obstruction. It might, therefore, be of value in the diagnosis of rejection complicating tubular necrosis after transplantation.

Serum hippuric acid concentration in renal allograft rejection, ureter obstruction, and tubular necrosis.

Plasma from 35 renal allograft recipients (21 males and 14 females) was sampled daily and analyzed for hippuric acid (HA) by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and serum creatinine. Twelve of these patients experienced an acute renal allograft rejection or a ureter obstruction as proven by clinical signs and biopsy, as well as by radiography or ultrasound, respectively. Two patients suffered from tubular necrosis followed by rejection during the postoperative period. Mean serum HA increased by 39.9 mumol/l from baseline (range 20.4-115.5 mumol/l) in patients with acute rejection 3 days after an initial increase that was observed 24 h before the mean serum creatinine increased by 107.1 mumol/l (range 21-193 mumol/l). In cases of ureter obstruction, HA rose by 1.6 mumol/l (range 1-8.2 mumol/l), significantly less than elevations due to rejection. The increase in creatinine, however, amounted to 65.3 mumol/l (range 22-140 mumol/l) and was not different from the change in rejecting patients. Successful antirejection treatment coincided with a decrease in serum HA starting 24 h earlier than the decrease in the serum creatinine concentration. Of special interest was the observation of a parallel decrease in HA with creatinine concentration in patients with tubular necrosis after allotransplantation; HA increased in cases of an additional rejection. Our data suggest that HA, which is excreted by tubular secretion and glomerular filtration, could be a sensitive and early marker of acute allograft rejection. Furthermore, it seems to discriminate between acute renal allograft rejection and ureter obstruction. It might, therefore, be of value in the diagnosis of rejection complicating tubular necrosis after transplantation.

Role of altered prednisolone-specific lymphocyte sensitivity in chronic renal failure as a pharmacodynamic marker of acute allograft rejection after kidney transplantation

The effects of four immunosuppressive agents on the in vitro blastogenesis of peripheral blood lymphocytes activated by concanavalin A have been studied using cells from 26 healthy subjects, 34 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) and 30 kidney transplant recipients. Differences in lymphocyte sensitivity to prednisolone between the healthy subjects and the CRF patients were statistically significant (P less than 0.0002), with impaired sensitivity in CRF. Impaired lymphocyte sensitivity occurred in 3.8% and 52.9% of the healthy and CRF subjects, respectively. Lymphocyte sensitivity to prednisolone, both preoperatively and 3 months post-operatively, was strongly correlated with early allograft rejection during co-administration of prednisolone with cyclosporin or azathioprine. Lymphocyte sensitivity to cyclosporin, azathioprine, and mizoribine in CRF was not significantly less than that in healthy subjects. Since the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone are little altered in renal transplantation, it is concluded that lymphocyte sensitivity specific to prednisolone may be a pharmacodynamic marker characteristic of successful graft survival in patients with histo-incompatibility and/or drug resistance.