Margins In Breast-conserving Surgery Research Articles

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Adequate Margins for Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

For patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) undergoing breast conservation surgery (BCS), guidelines advise a margin width of at least 2mm, with studies demonstrating decreased recurrence risk compared to narrower margins. However, limited data exist establishing if this margin is appropriate in mastectomies, and specifically for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM). Consequently, we evaluated the margins of DCIS patients undergoing NSM and resulting oncologic outcomes. A single-institution retrospective review was performed in patients with DCIS or DCIS with microinvasion (DCIS + MI) undergoing NSM from April 2010 to December 2021. Patient and tumor characteristics, margin status, treatment, and outcomes information were collected. The association between margins and local-regional (LRR) and distant recurrence (DR) were examined. 161 patients were included, comprising 284 NSM (164 therapeutic, 120 prophylactic). 153 patients had DCIS and 8 had DCIS + MI. Most patients had hormone sensitive, 123 (76.4%), and nuclear grade 2, 72 (44.7%), disease. In total, 35 (21.7%) patients had positive or <2mm margins. Of these, 21 (60%) involved the anterior margin. At a median follow-up of 45 months (range 0-151), 2.5% (n = 4) had a LRR and .6% (n = 1) had a DR. Of patients with a recurrence, only 2 had positive or <2mm margins, 1 had received endocrine therapy, and none received adjuvant radiation. No specific margin status was found to correlate with recurrence for patients with DCIS or DCIS + MI undergoing NSM, with an altogether low recurrence risk. Overall, this suggests that recommended DCIS margins in BCS doesn't necessarily apply in NSM, where margins of <2mm may be acceptable.

Three-dimensional surgical margin positioning technique versus palpation-guided method for breast-conserving surgery: Feasibility, advantages, and quality of life

BackgroundThe accurate evaluation of surgical margins holds crucial importance in determining the success of breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The aim of this study was to introduce a novel technique for the positioning of surgical margins in BCS while highlighting its advantages. MethodsThis study included a cohort of breast cancer patients who underwent BCS. The patients were categorized into two groups: one group underwent BCS with the traditional palpation-guided method, and the other with the 3D-MPT technique. The study assessed and compared the feasibility, advantages, and outcomes in terms of quality of life between the two groups. ResultsA total of 80 patients were successfully enrolled in the study. No significant differences in clinicopathological features were observed between the two groups. The 3D-MPT technique was found to be feasible and offered several advantages over the palpation-guided method. The utilization of guide wires by experienced radiologists to position the margins before surgery enabled precise and swift specimen removal, resulting in the conservation of valuable time and a reduction in the need for re-excision. Furthermore, the 3D-MPT technique exhibited the potential to enhance cosmetic outcomes and elevate patient satisfaction, particularly in cases with uncertain tumor boundaries detectable by palpation. ConclusionThe 3D-MPT technique proves to be an effective and safe approach for reducing tumor positivity rates in initial surgical margins, thereby improving the quality of life for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery in comparison to the conventional method.

Clinicopathological Predictors of Positive Resection Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is associated with risk of positive resection margins following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and subsequent reoperation. Prior reports grossly underestimate the risk of margin positivity with IBC containing a DCIS component (IBC + DCIS) due to patient-level rather than margin-level analysis. The aim of this study was to delineate the relative risk of IBC + DCIS compared with pure IBC (without a DCIS component) on margin positivity through detailed margin-level interrogation. A single institution, retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted in which pathology databases were evaluated to identify patients who underwent BCS over 5years (2014-2019). Margin-level interrogation included granular detail into the extent, pathological subtype and grade of disease at each resection margin. Predictors of a positive margin were computed using multivariate regression analysis. Clinicopathological details were examined from 5454 margins from 909 women. The relative risk of a positive margin with IBC + DCIS versus pure IBC was 8.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.64-11.56) applying UK Association of Breast Surgery guidelines, and 8.44 (95% CI 6.57-10.84) applying the Society of Surgical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology guidelines. Independent predictors of margin positivity included younger patient age (0.033, 95% CI 0.006-0.060), lower specimen weight (0.045, 95% CI 0.020-0.069), multifocality (0.256, 95% CI 0.137-0.376), lymphovascular invasion (0.138, 95% CI 0.068-0.208) and comedonecrosis (0.113, 95% CI 0.040-0.185). Compared with pure IBC, the relative risk of a positive margin with IBC + DCIS is approximately ninefold, significantly higher than prior estimates. This margin-level methodology is believed to represent the impact of DCIS more accurately on margin positivity in IBC.

Digital breast tomosynthesis versus X-ray of the breast specimen for intraoperative margin assessment: A randomized trial

BackgroundInvolved resection margins after breast conserving surgery (BCS) often require a re-operation with increased patient anxiety and risk of impaired cosmesis.We investigated the number of re-operations due to involved resection margins after BCS comparing digital breast tomosynthesis(DBT) with X-ray for intraoperative margin evaluation.Furthermore, we assessed the diagnostic accuracy of these methods to predict histopathological margin status. Finally, we evaluated risk factors for re-operation. MethodsIn this randomized, non-blinded study, 250 invasive breast cancer patients were randomized (1:1), whereof 241 were analyzed intraoperatively with either DBT (intervention, n = 119) or X-ray (standard, n = 122). Pearson's chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, t-test, logistic and ordinal regression analysis was used as appropriate. ResultsNo difference was found in the number of re-operations between the DBT and X-ray group (16.8 % vs 19.7 %, p = 0.57), or in diagnostic accuracy to predict histopathological margin status (77.5 %, CI: 68.6–84.9 %) and (67.3 %, CI: 57.7–75.9 %), respectively. We evaluated 5 potential risk factors for re-operation: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) outside tumor, OR = 9.4 (CI: 4.3–20.6, p < 0.001); high mammographic breast density, OR = 6.1 (CI: 1.0–38.1, p = 0.047); non-evaluable margins on imaging, OR = 3.8 (CI: 1.3–10.8, p = 0.016); neoadjuvant chemotherapy, OR = 3.0 (CI: 1.0–8.8, p = 0.048); and T2 tumor-size, OR = 2.6 (CI: 1.0–6.4, p = 0.045). ConclusionsNo difference was found in the number of re-operations or in diagnostic accuracy to predict histopathological margin status between DBT and X-ray groups. DCIS outside the tumor showed the highest risk of re-operation. Intraoperative methods with improved visualization of DCIS are needed to obtain tumor free margins in BCS.

PP147 Intraoperative radiographic evaluation of the resection margins in breast-conserving surgery with the usage of digital two-point sectorography in patients with breast cancer

PP147 Intraoperative radiographic evaluation of the resection margins in breast-conserving surgery with the usage of digital two-point sectorography in patients with breast cancer

Assessment of resection margins during breast-conserving surgery using multimodal optical coherence tomography

Background. Breast cancer (BC) has been ranked first in morbidity and mortality among the female population in Russian Federation for several years. Rapid and accurate intraoperative examination of the cleanliness of resection margins is the main condition for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) to reduce the risks of local recurrence.Aim. To examine the tumor margins and assess the cleanliness of the resection margins in BCS in patients diagnosed with BC using multimodal optical coherence tomography (MM OCT) with comparative planned histological and additional molecular genetic analysis.Materials and methods. The study was carried out on postoperative samples of tumor and non-tumor breast tissue obtained from 115 patients with BC T1–2N0M0G2–3 stage IA–IIA, after BCS in the volume of radical resection or lumpectomy with histological control of the resection margins. A spectral domain MM OCT device (OCT 1300-E, BioMedTech LLC, Russia) was used, which provides structural OCT images to study the backscattering properties of tissue and allows performing a quantitative assessment of the elastic properties of the tissue by compression optical coherence elastography (OCE).Results. The MM OCT method was able to determine the exact margins between the tumor and non-tumor breast tissue. The main signs of the tumor were a decrease in the level and depth of penetration of the OCT signal in the structural OCT images, as well as an increase in the stiffness values (&gt;200 kPa) in the OCE images with the highest stiffness values (&gt;600 kPa) in the area of tumor cell accumulations. The use of compression OCE made it possible to detect clusters of tumor cells in the margins of resection at a distance of 5 mm from the visible border of the tumor. Among the 132 studied resection margins in 6 cases, the positive resection margin was determined by the OCE method, which was subsequently confirmed histologically. The negative resection margins were characterized by the lowest stiffness values (&lt;200 kPa) in the OCE images and were confirmed by both histological analysis and molecular genetic analysis. ROC-analysis established a threshold stiffness value of 159.8 kPa, which indicates the presence of tumor tissue at the resection margins in the presence of a high stiffness area larger than 500 µm. The high diagnostic accuracy of the OCE method (98.5 %) was determined to distinguish between the negative and positive resection margins during BCS.Conclusion. The use of MM OCT with OCE modality makes it possible to clearly distinguish different types of breast tissue in BC (adipose tissue, connective tissue, accumulation of tumor cells). MM OCT can be used as an additional intraoperative tool for visualizing tumor cells boundaries and assessing the cleanliness of resection margins in real time during BCS.

Diagnostic value of preoperative examination for evaluating margin status in breast cancer.

A positive resection margin is a major risk factor for local breast cancer recurrence after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Preoperative imaging examinations are frequently employed to assess the surgical margin. To investigate the role and value of preoperative imaging examinations [magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), molybdenum target, and ultrasound] in evaluating margins for BCS. A retrospective study was conducted on 323 breast cancer patients who met the criteria for BCS and consented to the procedure from January 2014 to July 2021. The study gathered preoperative imaging data (MRI, ultrasound, and molybdenum target examination) and intraoperative and postoperative pathological information. Based on their BCS outcomes, patients were categorized into positive and negative margin groups. Subsequently, the patients were randomly split into a training set (226 patients, approximately 70%) and a validation set (97 patients, approximately 30%). The imaging and pathological information was analyzed and summarized using R software. Non-conditional logistic regression and LASSO regression were conducted in the validation set to identify factors that might influence the failure of BCS. A column chart was generated and applied to the validation set to examine the relationship between pathological margin range and prognosis. This study aims to identify the risk factors associated with failure in BCS. The multivariate non-conditional logistic regression analysis demonstrated that various factors raise the risk of positive margins following BCS. These factors comprise non-mass enhancement (NME) on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, multiple focal vascular signs around the lesion on MRI, tumor size exceeding 2 cm, type III time-signal intensity curve, indistinct margins on molybdenum target examination, unclear margins on ultrasound examination, and estrogen receptor (ER) positivity in immunohistochemistry. LASSO regression was additionally employed in this study to identify four predictive factors for the model: ER, molybdenum target tumor type (MT Xmd Shape), maximum intensity projection imaging feature, and lesion type on MRI. The model constructed with these predictive factors exhibited strong consistency with the real-world scenario in both the training set and validation set. Particularly, the outcomes of the column chart model accurately predicted the likelihood of positive margins in BCS. The proposed column chart model effectively predicts the success of BCS for breast cancer. The model utilizes preoperative ultrasound, molybdenum target, MRI, and core needle biopsy pathology evaluation results, all of which align with the real-world scenario. Hence, our model can offer dependable guidance for clinical decision-making concerning BCS.

A Comparison of Spectroscopy and Imaging Techniques Utilizing Spectrally Resolved Diffusely Reflected Light for Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Up to 19% of patients require re-excision surgery due to positive margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Intraoperative margin assessment tools (IMAs) that incorporate tissue optical measurements could help reduce re-excision rates. This review focuses on methods that use and assess spectrally resolved diffusely reflected light for breast cancer detection in the intraoperative setting. Following PROSPERO registration (CRD42022356216), an electronic search was performed. The modalities searched for were diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), multispectral imaging (MSI), hyperspectral imaging (HSI), and spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI). The inclusion criteria encompassed studies of human in vivo or ex vivo breast tissues, which presented data on accuracy. The exclusion criteria were contrast use, frozen samples, and other imaging adjuncts. 19 studies were selected following PRISMA guidelines. Studies were divided into point-based (spectroscopy) or whole field-of-view (imaging) techniques. A fixed-or random-effects model analysis generated pooled sensitivity/specificity for the different modalities, following heterogeneity calculations using the Q statistic. Overall, imaging-based techniques had better pooled sensitivity/specificity (0.90 (CI 0.76-1.03)/0.92 (CI 0.78-1.06)) compared with probe-based techniques (0.84 (CI 0.78-0.89)/0.85 (CI 0.79-0.91)). The use of spectrally resolved diffusely reflected light is a rapid, non-contact technique that confers accuracy in discriminating between normal and malignant breast tissue, and it constitutes a potential IMA tool.

Risk Factors for Positive Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Introduction Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) followed by adjuvant radiotherapy has similar overall survival compared to mastectomybut is associated with higher rates of local recurrence. Positive surgical margins in BCS are the most important predictor of local recurrence. The aim of our study was to assess the risk factors associated with positive margins in women undergoing BCS for breast cancerin order to inform our clinical practice and minimize re-operation rates. Methods Patients with a diagnosis ofbreast cancer who underwent BCS from January 2013 to January 2021 were identified from our pathology database and included in the study. All patients underwent a lumpectomy with the removal of additional shaved cavity margins. Statistical analysis was used toassess the effect of patient clinical and pathological risk factors on the rate of positive margins. Results One hundred and twenty patients underwent BCS for breast cancer. Twenty-four percent of patients had positive margins. Of the 29 patients that underwent subsequent re-excisions, only 13 (45%) hadresidual disease in the re-excision specimen. In younger patients, tumors localized in lower quadrants and the presence of extensive intraductal component within invasive breast cancer increased the risk of positive margins. In addition, positive margins were encountered more significantly in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) compared to invasive tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that DCIS and young age were the only factors independently associated with positive margins. Conclusion DCIS and younger patients have a higher rate of positive margins during BCS than invasive breast cancer. For such patients at higher risk of positive margins, excision of cavity shave margins and intraoperative inking may be done to lower positive margin rates.Preoperative review of breast imaging, core biopsies, and counseling of patients about the likelihood of positive margins is important.

Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Positive Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

BackgroundThe chances of second surgery due to positive margins in patients receiving breast-conversing surgery (BCS) were about 20-40%. This study aims to develop and validate a nomogram to predict the status of breast-conserving margins.MethodsThe database identified patients with core needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast carcinoma who underwent BCS in Shanxi Bethune Hospital between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021 (n = 573). The patients were divided into two models: (1) The first model consists of 398 patients who underwent BCS between 2015 and 2019; (2) The validation model consists of 175 patients who underwent BCS between 2020 and 2021. The development of the nomogram was based on the findings of multivariate logistic regression analysis. Discrimination was assessed by computing the C-index. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was used to validate the calibration performance.ResultsThe final multivariate regression model was developed as a nomogram, including blood flow signals (OR = 2.88, p = 0.001), grade (OR = 2.46, p = 0.002), microcalcifications (OR = 2.39, p = 0.003), tumor size in ultrasound (OR = 2.12, p = 0.011) and cerbB-2 status (OR = 1.99, p = 0.042). C-indices were calculated of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.64-0.78) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.59-0.78) for the modeling and the validation group, respectively. The calibration of the model was considered adequate in the validation group (p > 0.05).ConclusionWe developed a nomogram that enables the estimation of the preoperative risk of positive BCS margins. Our nomogram provides a valuable tool for identifying high-risk patients who might have to undergo a wider excision.

Nontoxic Tumor-Targeting Optical Agents for Intraoperative Breast Tumor Imaging.

Precise identification of the tumor margins during breast-conserving surgery (BCS) remains a challenge given the lack of visual discrepancy between malignant and surrounding normal tissues. Therefore, we developed a fluorescent imaging agent, ICG-p28, for intraoperative imaging guidance to better aid surgeons in achieving negative margins in BCS. Here, we determined the pharmacokinetics (PK), biodistribution, and preclinical toxicity of ICG-p28. The PK and biodistribution of ICG-p28 indicated rapid tissue uptake and localization at tumor lesions. There were no dose-related effect and no significant toxicity in any of the breast cancer and normal cell lines tested. Furthermore, ICG-p28 was evaluated in clinically relevant settings with transgenic mice that spontaneously developed invasive mammary tumors. Intraoperative imaging with ICG-p28 showed a significant reduction in the tumor recurrence rate. This simple, nontoxic, and cost-effective method can offer a new approach that enables surgeons to intraoperatively identify tumor margins and potentially improves overall outcomes by reducing recurrence rates.

Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography for Intraoperative Evaluation of Tumor Margins and Surgical Margins in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

We compare the effectiveness of multimodal optical coherence tomography (MM OCT) in the traditional structural OCT mode and the OCT elastography (OCE) mode in addressing two clinically important tasks: (1) detecting groups of tumor cells at surgical margins during breast-сonserving surgery (BСS) in breast cancer (BC) and (2) identifying breast tumor margins. The obtained results were correlated with corresponding histological sections. The study was performed on 100 surgical margin samples (top, bottom, medial, and lateral - four samples from each patient in total) obtained from 25 patients with BC who underwent BCS (lumpectomy), and on 25 postoperative tumor samples (to determine tumor margins). With MM OCT method, we visually and numerically assessed the scattering (level and depth of OCT signal penetration) and elastic (stiffness values, or Young's modulus (kPa)) properties of the tumor and non-tumor breast tissue and the obtained values were compared with the results of postoperative histological examination. In 4 surgical margin samples (out of 100), with the OCE method we identified groups of histologically confirmed tumor cells ("positive" resection margins) at the distance of about 5 mm from the visible tumor margin. The identified zones were larger than 0.5 mm with stiffness of more than 400 kPa in all these cases. However, the structural OCT could not identify these groups of tumors and they were not distinguishable from the surrounding fibrous tissue.In the areas of tumor into non-tumor tissue transition, structural OCT images detected tumor margins only if they were adjacent to adipose tissue and did not detect them if there were adjacent to non-tumor fibrous tissue. OCE images with high stiffness values (more than 400 kPa) and high contrast showed a clear tumor margin with both adipose and fibrous tissue. The study demonstarets the potential of MM OCT, particularly its OCE mode, as a real-time method for intraoperative tumor margin and surgical margin assessment in BCS. OCE images compared to structural OCT images visualize higher contrast between different types of breast tissue (adipose tissue, fibrous stroma, hyalinized stroma, tumor cell clusters), as well as more accurate identification of the tumor border and detection of small groups of tumor cells at surgical margins. An algorithm for intraoperative MM OCT examination of the state of the resection margin is proposed in accordance with standard clinical guidelines for achieving clean surgical margins in breast cancer patients.

Comparison of “click-to-sense” assay with frozen section analysis using simulated surgical margins in breast cancer patients

PurposeWe have shown that “Click-to-sense” (CTS) assay based on the visualization of cancer cells by fluorescence probe targeted for acrolein is useful for differentiating between the malignant and benign lesions of the breast. In the present study, we aimed to apply CTS assay to the examination of the simulated surgical margins, being compared with frozen section (FS) analysis. Experimental designThe simulated surgical margin samples (n = 300) were obtained from 1 to 2 cm distant sites from the tumor margin in the mastectomy specimens of breast cancer patients, and divided into the training (n = 150) and validation (n = 150) set. The samples were subjected to CTS assay, subsequently to FS analysis and finally to permanent section (PS) analysis. ResultsDiagnostic accuracy of the CTS assay and FS analysis was evaluated in the examination of the simulated surgical margin status finally determined by the PS analysis. In the training set, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy was 89.3%, 98.4%, and 96.7% for the CTS assay and 89.3%, 98.4%, and 96.7% for the FS analysis. In the validation set, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy was 93.3%, 98.3%, and 97.3% for the CTS assay, and 93.3%, 99.2%, and 98.0% for the FS analysis. ConclusionsThe CTS assay is as accurate as the FS analysis in the examination of the simulated surgical margins in breast cancer patients, and it seems to have a potential to replace the FS analysis for the intra-operative examination of surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery since it is less labor-intensive and more time-saving than the FS analysis.

Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients.

Background and ObjectivesOptimal margins for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remain controversial in breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. We examine the association of positive margins, reoperations, DCIS and age.MethodsA retrospective study of histopathological reports (4489 patients). Margin positivity was defined as ink on tumor for invasive carcinoma. For DCIS, we applied 2 mm anterior and side margin thresholds, and ink on tumor in the posterior margin.ResultsThe incidence of positive side margins was 20% in BCS and 5% in mastectomies (p < 0.001). Of these patients, 68% and 14% underwent a reoperation (p < 0.001). After a positive side margin in BCS, the reoperation rates according to age groups were 74% (<49), 69% (50–64), 68% (65–79), and 42% (80+) (p = 0.013). Of BCS patients with invasive carcinoma in the side margin, 73% were reoperated on. A reoperation was performed in 70% of patients with a close (≤1 mm) DCIS side margin, compared to 43% with a wider (1.1–2 mm) margin (p = 0.002). The reoperation rates were 55% in invasive carcinoma with close DCIS, 66% in close extensive intraductal component (EIC), and 83% in close pure DCIS (p < 0.001).ConclusionsIndividual assessment as opposed to rigid adherence to guidelines was used in the decision on reoperation.

Validated prediction model for positive resection margins in breast-conserving surgery based exclusively on preoperative data.

BackgroundPositive margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and subsequent second surgery are associated with increased costs and patient discomfort. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for positive margins based on risk factors available before surgery.MethodsPatients undergoing BCS for in situ or invasive cancer between 2015 and 2016 at site A formed a development cohort; those operated during 2017 in site A and B formed two validation cohorts. MRI was not used routinely. Preoperative radiographic and tumour characteristics and method of operation were collected from patient charts. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop a prediction model for positive margins including variables with discriminatory capacity identified in a univariable model. The discrimination and calibration of the prediction model was assessed in the validation cohorts, and a nomogram developed.ResultsThere were 432 patients in the development cohort, and 190 and 157 in site A and B validation cohorts respectively. Positive margins were identified in 77 patients (17.8 per cent) in the development cohort. A non-linear transformation of mammographic tumour size and six variables (visible on mammography, ductal carcinoma in situ, lobular invasive cancer, distance from nipple–areola complex, calcification, and type of surgery) were included in the final prediction model, which had an area under the curve of 0.80 (95 per cent c.i. 0.75 to 0.85). The discrimination and calibration of the prediction model was assessed in the validation cohorts, and a nomogram developed.ConclusionThe prediction model showed good ability to predict positive margins after BCS and might, after further validation, be used before surgery in centres without the routine use of preoperative MRI.Presented in part to the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, USA, December 2018 and the Swedish Surgical Society Annual Meeting, Helsingborg, Sweden, August 2018.

1131P Intraoperative assessment of negative resection margins in breast-conserving surgery using optical coherence elastography

Breast conserving surgery (BCS) has become increasingly accepted as the surgical management of breast cancer in clinical practice. The main goal of BCS is the complete removal of cancer with clear surgical margins. This study demonstrates the results of the diagnostic accuracy of compression optical coherence elastography (C-OCE) method in ex vivo determining of “positive” and “negative” surgery margins in BCS.

Low-Field NMR Relaxometry for Intraoperative Tumour Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery.

Simple SummaryBreast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer for women, and clear surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are essential for preventing recurrence. In this study, the potential of fast field-cycling 1H-NMR relaxometry as a new tool for intraoperative margin assessment was evaluated. The technique allows the determination of the tissue proton relaxation rates as a function of the applied magnetic field on small tissue samples excised from surgical specimens, at the margins of tumour resection, prior to histopathological analysis. It was found that a good accuracy in margin assessment, i.e., a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 85%, can be achieved. The discriminating ability shown by the relaxometric assay relies mainly on the difference of fat/water content between healthy and tumour cells. The information obtained has the potential to support the surgeon in real-time margin assessment during BCS.As conserving surgery is routinely applied for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer, the need for new technology to improve intraoperative margin assessment has become increasingly important. In this study, the potential of fast field-cycling 1H-NMR relaxometry as a new diagnostic tool was evaluated. The technique allows the determination of the tissue proton relaxation rates (R1), as a function of the applied magnetic field, which are affected by the changes in the composition of the mammary gland tissue occurring during the development of neoplasia. The study involved 104 small tissue samples obtained from surgical specimens destined for histopathology. It was found that a good accuracy in margin assessment, i.e., a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 85%, can be achieved by using two quantifiers, namely (i) the slope of the line joining the R1 values measured at 0.02 and 1 MHz and (ii) the sum of the R1 values measured at 0.39 and 1 MHz. The method is fast, and it does not rely on the expertise of a pathologist or cytologist. The obtained results suggest that a simplified, low-cost, automated instrument might compete well with the currently available tools in margin assessment.

Lack of definitive presurgical pathological diagnosis is associated with inadequate surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery

PurposeTo determine the impact of definitive presurgical diagnosis on surgical margins in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for primary carcinomas; clinicopathological features were also analyzed. MethodsThis retrospective study included women who underwent BCS for primary carcinomas in 2016 and 2017. Definitive presurgical diagnosis was defined as having a presurgical core needle biopsy (CNB) and not being upstaged between biopsy and surgery. Biopsy data and imaging findings including breast density were retrieved. Inadequate surgical margins (IM) were defined per latest ASCO and ASTRO guidelines. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. Results360 women (median age, 66) met inclusion criteria with 1 having 2 cancers. 82.5% (298/361) were invasive cancers while 17.5% (63/361) were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Most biopsies were US-guided (284/346, 82.0%), followed by mammographic (60/346, 17.3%), and MRI-guided (2/346, 0.6%). US and mammographic CNB yielded median samples of 2 and 4, respectively, with a 14G needle. 15 patients (4.2%) lacked presurgical CNB. The IM rate was 30.0%. In multivariable analysis, large invasive cancers (>20 mm), dense breasts, and DCIS were associated with IM (p = 0.029, p = 0.010, and p = 0.013, respectively). Most importantly, lack of definitive presurgical diagnosis was a risk factor for IM (OR, 2.35; 95% CI: 1.23–4.51, p = 0.010). In contrast, neither patient age (<50) nor aggressive features (e.g., LVI) were associated with IM. ConclusionLack of a definitive presurgical diagnosis was associated with a two-fold increase of IM in BCS; other risk factors were dense breasts, large invasive cancers, and DCIS.

Bracketing with Multiple Radioactive Seeds to Achieve Negative Margins in Breast Conservation Surgery: Multiple Seeds in Breast Surgery

IntroductionBreast conservation surgery (BCS) is the treatment of choice for unifocal, early-stage breast cancer. The ability to offer BCS to a wider subset of patients, including those with multifocal/multicentric cancer as well as extensive ductal carcinoma in situ, has emerged over time, especially in those undergoing joint oncoplastic reconstruction and those treated with neoadjuvant therapy. However, localization techniques using multiple radioactive seeds for bracketing in this patient subset have not been validated. Materials and MethodsA single-institution retrospective review was conducted of all patients with breast cancer who underwent BCS, guided by multiple bracketed iodine I 125 radioactive seeds between January 2014 and April 2017. ResultsBracketing of breast cancer using 2 or more radioactive seeds was performed in 157 breasts in 156 patients. Negative margins were achieved in 124 of 157 (79%) breasts, including 33 cases (21%) that underwent targeted margin reexcision at the time of surgery after intraoperative, multidisciplinary margin assessment. Thirty-three cases (21%) resulted in close or positive margins, of which 11 (7%) and 10 (6.4%) underwent completion mastectomy or repeat lumpectomy, respectively. Twelve patients (7.6%) did not undergo reexcision. En bloc resection was successful in 134 of 157 (85.4%) lumpectomies. Eighty-nine percent of the procedures were coupled with oncoplastic reconstruction. ConclusionBracketing techniques using multiple radioactive seeds expands the indications for breast conservation therapy in patients who would have traditionally required mastectomy. Intraoperative margin assessment improves surgical and pathologic success. Larger defects created by multifocal resection are optimally managed in concert with oncoplastic reconstruction to minimize asymmetries and aesthetic defects.

Clinical practice guidelines for ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) practice guidelines 2021.

Clinical practice guidelines for ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: Chinese Society of Breast Surgery (CSBrS) practice guidelines 2021.