PurposeThis study aimed to assess the stress distribution in pulpotomized primary molars with different types of restorative materials using 3D-finite element analysis (FEA), and provide valuable insights into the selection and application of restorative materials, with the ultimate goal of reducing the risk of pulpotomy failure and protecting residual dental tissue. MethodsFour 3D models of pulpotomized primary molars with different restorative materials according to the material and its elastic modulus were analysed: resin composite, stainless steel crowns (SSCs), prefabricated zirconia crowns and endocrowns. The food layer was also designed before vertical and bucco-lingual forces were applied to simulate physiological masticatory conditions. The results were obtained by colorimetric graphs of the von Mises stresses (VMS) in the restoration and tooth remnant. The maximum shear stress on the bonding interfaces and pressure stress on the Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-pulp interfaces were recorded. ResultsThe results of the 3D-FEA showed that all restorative materials generated stresses and strains on the tooth structure after pulpotomy. In the resin composite group, the marginal enamel exhibited the highest stress peaks. In the zirconia crown and SSC groups, there was a concentration of stress at the dentin-restoration margin. The shear stress concentrations were mainly at the adhesive margins, with lower levels around endocrowns compared to other groups. MTA in the resin composite group experienced more VMS than in the other group. The resin composite group also generated relatively higher pressure stress values at the MTA-pulp interface compared to the other groups. SignificanceIn the model of primary teeth following pulpotomy, the three types of restorations covering the occlusal surface can effectively reduce the stress on pulp capping materials under occlusal loads, thereby potentially decreasing the risk of pulpotomy failure. In addition, the group of endocrowns demonstrated reduced stress at the bonding interface and in the stress concentration zone near the dentist-restoration edge, making them more effective at protecting residual dental tissue.