Management Of Venous Thromboembolism Research Articles

Gynecological Cancer and Venous Thromboembolism: A Narrative Review to Increase Awareness and Improve Risk Assessment and Prevention.

The prevention and appropriate management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients is of paramount importance. However, the literature data report an underestimation of this major problem in patients with gynecological cancers, with an inconsistent venous thromboembolism risk assessment and prophylaxis in this patient setting. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the available evidence regarding the management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients, focusing on the specific context of gynecological tumors, exploring the literature discussing risk factors, risk assessment, and pharmacological prophylaxis. We found that the current understanding and management of venous thromboembolism in gynecological malignancy is largely based on studies on solid cancers in general. Hence, further, larger, and well-designed research in this area is needed.

Venous thromboembolism characteristics and outcomes among RIETE patients tested and untested for inherited thrombophilia

AbstractInherited thrombophilia (IT) workup is commonly pursued in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE). Recent American Society of Hematology guidelines recommend a selective approach to IT testing, nevertheless, evidence on whether thrombophilia testing can actually improve patient-important outcomes through tailored management is limited. Data from the large, prospective Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry were analyzed to compare VTE risk factors, management, and outcomes between patients who were tested for IT and untested patients, during anticoagulant treatment and after its discontinuation. Among 103 818 patients enrolled in RIETE, 21 089 (20.3%) were tested for IT, 8422 (8.1%) tested positive, and 82 729 (79.7%) were not tested. IT testing was more frequent in patients with VTE provoked by minor risk factors and less common in those with major risk factors such as surgery or active cancer. Choices of anticoagulant treatment did not differ based on IT testing results. Untested patients exhibited inferior outcomes across all VTE categories, with higher rates of VTE recurrence, major bleeding, mortality, and notably, cancer-related mortality. After treatment discontinuation, IT-negative patients with surgically provoked VTE showed lower recurrence rates. For immobilization-related VTE as well as in estrogen-related VTE, no significant differences in recurrence rates were observed between IT-negative and IT-positive patients. However, IT-negative patients with pregnancy or postpartum-related VTE had significantly lower recurrence rates. Patients with unprovoked VTE, particularly those testing positive for IT, had high recurrence rates after treatment. These findings underscore the complex role of IT testing in managing VTE, supporting personalized treatment strategies that consider VTE risk factors and comorbidities. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02832245.

Pregnancy-Associated Venous Thromboembolism.

One of the leading causes of maternal death in the United States is venous thromboembolism (VTE), which is influenced by acquired, genetic, and environmental factors. Pregnancy-associated physiological changes that exhibit the characteristics of Virchow's triad: reduced fibrinolysis, increased coagulation factors, trauma, and venous stasis all raise the risk of VTE. Furthermore, multiple gestations, advanced maternal age, cesarean delivery, and obesity are all pregnancy-associated risk factors that also increase the risk of VTE. Management of VTE during pregnancy can be challenging due to the risks and benefits of anticoagulant therapy and potential hazard for both the fetus and the mother. In this review, we discuss the prevalence, pathogenesis, predisposing factors, and therapeutic options such as systemic thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and catheter-directed thrombolysis.

Can Routine Investigation for Occult Pulmonary Embolism Be Justified in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis?

This study aims to investigate whether routine screening for silent pulmonary embolism (PE) can be justified in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 201 patients with lower-extremity DVT admitted to the vascular surgery department of a single tertiary university center between 2019 and 2023. All patients underwent clinical evaluation, basic laboratory exams, a whole-leg colored duplex ultrasound, and a computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), to screen for an occult, underlying PE. The overall incidence of silent PE was 48.8%. The median admission D-dimer level was significantly higher in patients with silent PE than in those without PE (9.60 vs. 5.51 mg/L, P=0.001). A D-dimer value ≥5.14 mg/L was discriminant for predicting silent PE, with a sensitivity of 68.2% and a specificity of 59.3%. Silent PE was significantly more common on the right side, with the embolus located at the main pulmonary, lobar, segmental, and subsegmental arteries in 29.6%, 32.7%, 20.4%, and 17.3%, respectively. A higher incidence of occult PE was observed in patients with iliofemoral DVT (P=0.037), particularly when the thrombus extended to the inferior vena cava (P=0.003). Moreover, iliofemoral DVT was associated with a larger size and a more proximal location of the embolus (P=0.041). Multivariate logistic regression showed that male sex (odds ratio [OR]=2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-3.53; P=0.026), cancer (OR=2.76, 95% CI: 1.45-4.07; P=0.017), previous venous thromboembolism (VTE) history (OR=2.67, 95% CI: 1.33-4.01; P=0.022), D-dimer value ≥5.14 mg/L (OR=2.24, 95% CI: 1.10-3.38; P=0.033), iliofemoral DVT (OR=2.13, 95% CI: 1.19-3.07; P=0.041), and thrombus extension to the IVC (OR=2.95, 95% CI: 1.43-4.47; P=0.009) served as independent predictors for silent PE. A high incidence of silent PE was observed in patients with lower-extremity DVT. Screening of patients with DVT who have the aforementioned predictive risk factors using CTPA for silent PE may be needed and justified for the efficient management of VTE and its long-term complications.

Thrombophilia testing for whom, why and when – a review of current practices

Thromboembolic conditions have accounted for 1 in 4 deaths worldwide in 2010. Thrombosis, which is the common pathogenesis of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism (VTE), is the leading cause of death (1/5 deaths in 1990). Hospital-acquired VTE accounts for approximately 60 percent of all VTEs annually. Others include cancer-associated thrombosis and gender associated risks. In addition to the disease burden, it also causes a significant economic burden world-wide. Multiple diagnostic tests and treatment, prolonged hospital stay and follow-up care, including management of recurrent VTE can be extremely costly. Therefore, it is important to focus on VTE prevention so that health care systems can save money, improve outcomes and save lives. In this background, it is important to have a clear direction as to when, how and whom to test for thrombophilia. Testing for thrombophilias is often performed without a clear understanding of the clinical implications of such results. Guidelines vary in the appropriate use of thrombophilia testing. In this review, these variations in thrombophilia testing and the implications mentioned in the recent guidelines and other articles are discussed. The review of such guidelines, guidance statements, review articles conclude that screening for hereditary thrombophilia has very limited advantage in the management of patients with thrombosis. Screening for antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS) is more important given its high rate of recurrence in both venous and arterial thrombosis. Screening for underlying haematological conditions such as myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) and paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is also considered important.

Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism in Patients on Anticoagulation: An Update Based on the Revised AWMF S2k Guideline.

In the recently updated German S2k Guideline "Diagnostics and Therapy of Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism," a new chapter was incorporated about recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients on anticoagulation treatment. Despite the high efficacy of anticoagulation in most patients, approximately 2% experience a recurrent VTE event while receiving anticoagulant drugs. The proper diagnosis of the recurrent VTE is important and possible only with the knowledge of localization and thrombus burden of the primary VTE event. Possible reasons for recurrent VTE events in patients on anticoagulation are non-adherence to medication, sub-therapeutic drug levels due to resorption disorders or drug interactions, or concomitant disease with high thrombogenicity. Cancer is the most common underlying disease, but it is important to investigate and understand possible other causes whenever a breakthrough VTE event occurs. This results in the recommendation that in patients with VTE recurrence on therapeutic anticoagulation, in particular, the presence of malignant disease, antiphospholipid syndrome, and rare diseases like paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria or Behçet's disease should be considered. For VTE recurrence during heparin therapy, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II needs to be ruled out, even if platelet counts are within the normal range. Although the mechanisms of recurrence on anticoagulation can be evaluated in a certain degree, clinical evidence for the management of recurrent VTE in anticoagulated patients is minimal and mainly based on expert opinion. Switching anticoagulant medication and intensifying anticoagulant treatment are possible options.

Venous Thromboembolism Management throughout the COVID-19 Era: Addressing Acute and Long-Term Challenges.

Background: COVID-19 increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) through a complex interplay of mechanisms collectively referred to as immunothrombosis. Limited data exist on VTE challenges in the acute setting throughout a dynamic long-term follow-up of COVID-19 patients compared to non-COVID-19 patients. The aim of the study was to investigate acute and long-term management and complications in VTE patients with and without COVID-19. Methods: A prospective, observational, single-center cohort study on VTE patients followed from the acute care stage until 24 months post-diagnosis. Results: 157 patients, 30 with COVID-19-associated VTE and 127 unrelated to COVID-19, were enrolled. The mean follow-up was 10.8 (±8.9) months. COVID-19 patients had fewer comorbidities (1.3 ± 1.29 vs. 2.26 ± 1.68, p < 0.001), a higher proportion of pulmonary embolism at baseline (96.7% vs. 76.4%, p = 0.01), and had a lower probability of remaining on anticoagulant therapy after three months (p < 0.003). The most used initial therapy was low-molecular-weight heparin in 130/157 cases, followed by long-term treatment with direct oral anticoagulants in 123/157. Two (6.7%) COVID-19 vs. three (2.4%) non-COVID-19 patients (p = 0.243) had major hemorrhagic events, all of them within the first three months. Four (3.1%) non-COVID-19 patients had VTE recurrence after six months. Three (2.4%) non-COVID-19 patients developed chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. There were no fatalities among patients with COVID-19, compared to a mortality of 12/127 (9.4%) in the non-COVID-19 subgroup (p = 0.027). Discussion: Our study offers a comprehensive overview of the evolving nature of VTE management, emphasizing the importance of personalized risk-based approaches, including a limited course of anticoagulation for most COVID-19-associated VTE cases and reduced-dose extended therapy for high-risk subsets.

Anticoagulation in venous thromboembolism for the general physician.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently encountered across various specialties. The management of VTE has become more nuanced, requiring consideration of several factors when deciding on the choice and duration of anticoagulation. This evidence-based review article summarises the current practice and evidence behind anticoagulation in VTE, incorporating national and international guidelines. Factors influencing decision-making around the choice and duration of anticoagulation, along with special circumstances such as cancer and antiphospholipid syndrome, are discussed. The clinical utility of thrombophilia screening is also addressed.

Extending venous thromboembolism secondary prevention with apixaban in cancer patients. The EVE trial

BackgroundCancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) management guideline recommendations include continued therapeutic anticoagulation while active cancer persists. The Federal Drug Administration label for apixaban for secondary VTE prevention includes a dose reduction to 2.5 mg twice daily after 6 months of treatment. ObjectivesThe study’s purpose was to determine whether this dose reduction is advisable for cancer-associated VTE. MethodsA randomized, double-blind trial compared apixaban 2.5 mg with 5 mg twice daily for 12 months among cancer patients with VTE who had completed 6 to 12 months of anticoagulation therapy. The primary outcome was combined major bleeding plus clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. ResultsOf 370 patients recruited, 360 were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. Major plus clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 16 of 179 patients (8.9%) in the apixaban 2.5 mg group compared with 22 of 181 patients (12.2%) in the 5 mg group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% CI, 0.38-1.37; P = .39). Major bleeding occurred in 2.8% of the apixaban 2.5 mg group and in 2.2% of the 5 mg group (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.34-4.66; P = .73). Recurrent VTE or arterial thrombosis occurred in 9 of 179 patients (5.0%) in the apixaban 2.5 mg group and 9 of 181 patients (5.0%) in the 5 mg group (HR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.40-2.53; P = 1.00). All-cause mortality rates were similar between groups, 13% vs 12% (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.63-2.04; P = .67). ConclusionFor secondary prevention of cancer-associated VTE, apixaban 2.5 mg compared with 5 mg twice daily did not lower combined bleeding events (EVE trial NCT03080883).

Resolving the Gap in Evidence on the Role of Warfarin in Venous Thromboembolism Management in Japan.

Resolving the Gap in Evidence on the Role of Warfarin in Venous Thromboembolism Management in Japan.

Improvement of thrombosis management in patients with cancer: a practical consensus document of recommendations for cancer-associated thrombosis patients' healthcare in Spain.

Cancer patients are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), its recurrence, but also at risk of bleeding while anticoagulated. In addition, cancer therapies have been associated to increased VTE risk. Guidelines for VTE treatment in cancer patients recommend low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) for the initial treatment, DOAC for VTE short-term treatment, and LMWH or DOAC for VTE long-term treatment. This consensus article arises from a collaboration between different Spanish experts on cancer-associated thrombosis. It aims to reach an agreement on a practical document of recommendations for action allowing the healthcare homogenization of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) patients in Spain considering not only what is known about VTE management in cancer patients but also what is done in Spanish hospitals in the clinical practice. The text summarizes the current knowledge and available evidence on the subject in Spain and provides a series of practical recommendations for CAT management and treatment algorithms to help clinicians to manage CAT over time.

Abbott D-dimer assay: analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy in management of venous thromboembolism

This study aimed to assess analytical characteristics and diagnostic accuracy in management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the Emergency Department (ED) of the Abbott D-dimer assay applied on the Alinity c clinical chemistry analyzer (Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) compared to the INNOVANCE D-dimer assay (Siemens Healthineers, Marburg, Germany). Precision was determined at three concentration levels following the CLSI EP15-A3 protocol. Method comparison and diagnostic accuracy were assessed using samples obtained from 85 patients who were referred for diagnostic imaging and D-dimer testing due to clinically suspected VTE. Within-run coefficients of variation (CVs) were 3.0%, 0.5% and 0.5% at D-dimer concentrations of 0.54, 1.42 and 2.68 mg/L FEU, while respective between-run CVs were 2.0%, 3.4% and 2.7%, hence fulfilling the desirable biological variation criteria for imprecision (<12.6%). Passing–Bablok regression analysis yielded a small proportional difference between the two compared assays (y = 1.09 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.18) x + 0.09 (95%CI: –0.09 to 0.16)), while Bland–Altman analysis showed significant negative absolute (–0.6 mg/L FEU, 95%CI: –0.9 to −0.3) and relative mean bias (–14.1%, 95%CI: –20.3 to −7.9). Spearman’s ρ was 0.979 (95%CI: 0.967–0.986). Inter-assay agreement relative to the cut-off was 92% (kappa coefficient = 0.547 (95%CI: 0.255–0.839)). Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the Abbott assay were 100%, 9.2%, 25.3% and 100%, respectively, compared to the following data for the INNOVANCE assay: 95.0%, 15.4%, 25.7% and 90.9%. Abbott D-dimer assay has shown excellent analytical precision, high comparability with the INNOVANCE D-dimer and high NPV at manufacturer’s cut-off.

Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism. International Consensus Statement. Guidelines according to scientific evidence.

Prevention and management of venous thromboembolism. International Consensus Statement. Guidelines according to scientific evidence.

Management of venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major health burden in patients with cancer, causing morbidity, emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and death. Treatment is challenging, as it is necessary to balance the risk of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding associated with anticoagulants. Treatment paradigms are shifting from low-molecular-weight heparin monotherapy. Multiple recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in this setting. Current studies are evaluating factor XI inhibitors as potential treatments for cancer-associated VTE.

Practical guidance for direct oral anticoagulant use in the treatment of venous thromboembolism in primary and metastatic brain tumor patients.

Management of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors (BT) is challenging because of the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). There are no prospective clinical trials evaluating safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), specifically in patients with BT, but they are widely used for VTE in this population. A group of neuro-oncology experts convened to provide practical clinical guidance for the off-label use of DOACs in treating VTE in patients with BT. We searched PubMed for the following terms: BTs, glioma, glioblastoma (GBM), brain metastasis, VTE, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH), DOACs, and ICH. Although prospective clinical trials are needed, the recommendations presented aim to assist clinicians in making informed decisions regarding DOACs for VTE in patients with BT.

Payer approval and rejection of oral anticoagulant prescriptions and prescription abandonment patterns among patients with venous thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major public health condition that renders patients at risk of recurrent events, which significantly increases their morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Apart from warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants, such as apixaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban, are approved for VTE treatment. Cardiovascular drugs are largely impacted by formulary restrictions; however, the impact on oral anticoagulants (including warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants) in VTE has not been well studied. To describe the extent of payer-rejected claims for oral anticoagulants for VTE and the factors associated with rejected claims. Prescription abandonment of oral anticoagulants and the time to an eventual fill for oral anticoagulant after rejection or abandonment were also evaluated. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients with VTE newly prescribed an oral anticoagulant (first claim was the index) between October 2016 and October 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the proportion of patients with paid (ie, filled), rejected, or abandoned index oral anticoagulant prescription and journey to paid prescription among those with initial rejection. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with initial rejection. Among the overall sample (N = 297,312), 74.3% had initial oral anticoagulant prescriptions approved, 9.1% had them rejected, and 16.7% abandoned them. Of the patients with initial rejection, 82.1% eventually filled their oral anticoagulant prescriptions; however, for 14.2% of these patients, the first fill was for an oral anticoagulant other than that initially prescribed. The mean time to a first fill for an oral anticoagulant after an initial rejection was 18.3 days. More than half of the patients with an initial rejected oral anticoagulant claim had at least 1 additional rejection during the follow-up period. Of the patients who abandoned their initial oral anticoagulant prescription, 83.9% filled an oral anticoagulant prescription during follow-up; the mean time to fill for the index oral anticoagulant was 15.6 days. Oral anticoagulant type, Medicare payer coverage, prescribing physician specialty, and VTE diagnosis setting of care were significantly associated with index oral anticoagulant claim rejection (P < 0.05). Rejection and abandonment may delay access to oral anticoagulant treatment. Factors contributing to these scenarios should be understood and addressed for proper VTE management.

Assessment and predictors of inappropriate dose of direct oral anticoagulants

Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have revolutionized the management of Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Venous Thromboembolism (VTE). However, recent audits reveal a significant burden of inappropriate dosages in the prescribing of direct-acting oral anticoagulants. Our aim is to identify the prevalence and predictors of such inappropriate dosing in our patients. This retrospective study was conducted from June 2016 to January 2018. Patients who received dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban for treatment of venous thromboembolism or atrial fibrillation were included. Appropriateness of direct-acting oral anticoagulants dosing was assessed using US Food and Drug Administration guidelines. Data was analyzed using IBM® SPSS Version 26. 337 patients were included, with a mean age of 62.9±18.7 years. The majority were female (196, 58.3%). Of the patients, 194 (57.6%) received apixaban, 99 (29.4%) received rivaroxaban, and 44 (13.1%) received dabigatran. A total of 242 (71.8%) patients were prescribed direct-acting oral anticoagulants appropriately. Under-dosing and over-dosing were identified in 74 (22%) and 21 (6.2%) patients, respectively. Predictors of inappropriate dosing were age greater than 75 years (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.67-4.56, p&lt;0.001) and creatinine clearance less than 50 ml/minute (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.19-0.74, p: 0.005). Inappropriate dosing was significantly associated with mortality (p=0.010).One-third of our patients received an inappropriate dose of direct-acting oral anticoagulants, mostly from underdosing. Elderly age and low creatinine clearance are significant predictors of inappropriate dose administration.

Venous Thromboembolism in Children: The Rivaroxaban Experience.

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the pediatric population has increased more than 10-fold in the last 20 years, as a consequence of the advancement of resuscitation and surgical techniques and the global increase in life expectancy of children suffering from chronic pathologies. Monitoring anticoagulant therapy to achieve outcomes within the target range in childhood VTE, parenteral administration of medications, and frequent blood tests in children are often cumbersome. Availability of safe and effective oral agents with pediatric data to support use would be of clear benefit. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model was developed to estimate the appropriate dosing schedule for rivaroxaban in children. This incorporated growth/maturation and variability in anthropometrics (e.g., body height, weight, and body mass index), anatomy (e.g., organ weight), physiology (e.g., blood flow rates), metabolism and excretion. Rivaroxaban use in pediatric population underwent a complete investigational program, consisting mainly of one phase I pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics trial, three phase II trials, one phase III trial. The phase III trial enrolled 500 patients from birth to <18 years and documented the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban regimens at dose equivalent to the adult 20 mg dose for the prevention of fatal or symptomatic nonfatal recurrent VTE and major bleeding versus heparin or vitamin K antagonists. Results were similar to those in rivaroxaban studies in adults. The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in children reported in the EINSTEIN JUNIOR trial provide further support to previous trials in adults (EINSTEIN Program), which demonstrate a favorable profile for the use of rivaroxaban for the management of VTE in challenging patient populations. Other clinical evidence contributing to the use of rivaroxaban among different risk groups in pediatric VTE population confirms the consistency with principal trial. Our review aims to describe the rationale for using rivaroxaban oral suspension in clinical practice and to summarize its multiple indications in each vascular bed (e.g., cerebral venous thrombosis, symptomatic or asymptomatic central venous catheter-associated thrombosis), etiology, and patients setting.

Choice and Duration of Anticoagulation for Venous Thromboembolism.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a prevalent medical condition with high morbidity, mortality, and associated costs. Anticoagulation remains the main treatment for VTE, though the decision on when, how, and for how long to administer anticoagulants is increasingly complex. This review highlights the different phases of VTE management, with special circumstances for consideration such as antiphospholipid syndrome, coronary artery disease, cancer-associated thrombus, COVID-19, and future anticoagulation options. Anticoagulation management will continue to be a complex decision, applying evidence-based medicine to individual patients with the hope of maximizing effectiveness while minimizing risks.

Age-Related Differences in the Presentation, Management, and Clinical Outcomes of 100,000 Patients With Venous Thromboembolism in the RIETE Registry

IntroductionAlthough older adults represent a significant proportion of patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE), the data on the impact of age-related differences in the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of VTE are scarce. MethodsWe analyzed data from the RIETE registry database, an ongoing global observational registry of patients with objectively confirmed VTE, to compare patient characteristics, clinical presentation, treatments, and outcomes between elderly (≥70 years) vs. non-elderly (<70 years) patients. ResultsFrom January 2001 to March 2021, 100,000 adult patients were enrolled in RIETE. Elderly patients (47.9%) were more frequently women (58.2% vs. 43.5%), more likely had unprovoked VTE (50.5% vs. 45.1%) and most often presented with severe renal failure (10.2% vs. 1.2%) and acute pulmonary embolism (PE) (vs. deep vein thrombosis) (54.3% vs. 44.5%) compared to non-elderly patients (p<0.001 for all comparisons). For the PE subgroup, elderly patients more frequently had non-low risk PE (78.9% vs. 50.7%; p<0.001), respiratory failure (33.9% vs. 21.8%; p<0.001) and myocardial injury (40.0% vs. 26.2%; p<0.001) compared to non-elderly patients. Thrombolysis (0.9% vs. 1.7%; p<0.001) and direct oral anticoagulants (8.8% vs. 11.8%; p<0.001) were less frequently administered to elderly patients. Elderly patients showed a significantly higher 30-day all-cause mortality (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.36, 95%CI: 1.22–1.52) and major bleeding (OR, 2.08; 95%CI, 1.85–2.33), but a lower risk of 30-day VTE recurrences (OR, 0.62, 95%CI, 0.54–0.71). ConclusionsCompared with non-elderly patients, elderly patients had a different VTE clinical profile. Advanced therapies were less frequently used in older patients. Age was an independent predictor of mortality.