Management Of Venous Thromboembolic Disease Research Articles

Comparación de resultados clínicos de enfermedad tromboembólica venosa según manejo ambulatorio versus hospitalario

Objectives. To compare the occurrence of death, bleeding, and recurrence according to inpatient or outpatient management of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Materials and methods. Retrospective cohort that included a consecutive sampling of VTE consultations between 2016 and 2019 diagnosed in the Emergency Center of a private hospital in Argentina. Results. There were 1202 cases, 908 with isolated deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 205 with isolated pulmonary embolism (PE), and 89 cases of combined DVT - PE. 66% were women, with a median age of 77 years; 72% of cases were managed on an outpatient basis (n= 862). Comorbidities associated with hospitalization were obesity (p=0.03), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (p=0.01), heart failure (CHF) (p=0.01), chronic renal failure (CKD) (p=0.01), and cancer (p=0.01). At 90 days, the cumulative incidence of bleeding was 2.6% in inpatient compared to 2.9% in outpatient management (p=0.81); recurrence was 0% versus 0.9% (p=0.07), and mortality was 42.9% versus 18.9%, respectively (p=0.01). The HR for 90-day mortality in hospitalized patients adjusted for confounders (sex, age, type of VTE, obesity, CKD, CHF, COPD, and cancer) was 1.99 (95% CI 1.49-2.64; p=0.01). Conclusions. In this elderly, and predominantly female Argentine population, the 90-day mortality in patients hospitalized for VTE was higher than mortality in patients with outpatient management, without differences in recurrence or major bleeding.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of venous thromboembolic disease between outpatient and inpatient management.

To compare the occurrence of death, bleeding, and recurrence according to inpatient or outpatient management of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). . Retrospective cohort that included a consecutive sampling of VTE consultations between 2016 and 2019 diagnosed in the Emergency Center of a private hospital in Argentina. There were 1202 cases, 908 with isolated deep vein thrombosis (DVT), 205 with isolated pulmonary embolism (PE), and 89 cases of combined DVT - PE. 66% were women, with a median age of 77 years; 72% of cases were managed on an outpatient basis (n= 862). Comorbidities associated with hospitalization were obesity (p=0.03), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (p=0.01), heart failure (CHF) (p=0.01), chronic renal failure (CKD) (p=0.01), and cancer (p=0.01). At 90 days, the cumulative incidence of bleeding was 2.6% in inpatient compared to 2.9% in outpatient management (p=0.81); recurrence was 0% versus 0.9% (p=0.07), and mortality was 42.9% versus 18.9%, respectively (p=0.01). The HR for 90-day mortality in hospitalized patients adjusted for confounders (sex, age, type of VTE, obesity, CKD, CHF, COPD, and cancer) was 1.99 (95% CI 1.49-2.64; p=0.01). In this elderly, and predominantly female Argentine population, the 90-day mortality in patients hospitalized for VTE was higher than mortality in patients with outpatient management, without differences in recurrence or major bleeding.

Risk factors, diagnosis and management of venous thromboembolic disease in pregnancy.

To gain an understanding of current knowledge on risk factors for pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism (PA-VTE).To gain an understanding of the diagnosis of PA-VTE.To review up-to-date approaches to preventing and treating PA-VTE.To discuss possible limitations in current research and areas which require improvement.

Venous Thromboembolic Disease and Thrombolysis at the Yaoundé Emergency Center during the Past Five Years, Cameroon

Background: Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is a clinical entity whose two clinical manifestations are deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). It is a frequent and severe disease in Cameroon, thus constituting a significant public health problem. We aimed to describe VTE management in the Yaoundé Emergency Center, in particular the use of thrombolysis. Methods: This was a retrospective study on patients hospitalized at the Yaoundé Emergency Center for DVT and/or PE from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. We collected clinical signs, paraclinical signs, risk factors of VTE, and management methods from each patient. Results: We recruited 106 participants. Dyspnea was the most frequent symptom; PE was the most common form of VTE in eight patients on 10. Obesity and high blood pressure were the main cardiovascular risk factors. The main clinical signs were oedema and pain in the limb for DVT, dyspnea, and tachycardia for PE. Heparinotherapy was the most commonly used management modality. Thrombolysis was performed in 7.5% of participants, especially in the case of hypotension or massive PE. Conclusion: In VTE management, thrombolysis remains the least used therapeutic modality in our context. Heparinotherapy remains the basis of the therapy.

Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants with Aspirin Versus Warfarin with Aspirin for Atrial Fibrillation and/or Venous Thromboembolic Disease

▪IntroductionThe direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) including apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are increasingly utilized for the management of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) and/or non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Adding aspirin (ASA) to warfarin or DOAC therapy increases bleeding risk. Patients on combination therapy with ASA and an anticoagulant were not well represented in clinical trials comparing DOACs to warfarin. We sought to compare bleeding and thrombotic outcomes with DOACs and ASA compared to warfarin and ASA in a non-trial setting.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective registry-based cohort study of adults on DOAC or warfarin therapy for VTE and/or NVAF. Warfarin treated patients were followed by six anticoagulation clinics. Four out of the six clinics contributed data on their patients that were on DOACs in the Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI 2) from January 2009 to June 2021. Patients were excluded if they had a history of heart valve replacement, recent myocardial infarction, or less than 3 months of follow-up. Two propensity matched cohorts (warfarin+ASA vs DOAC+ASA) of patients were analyzed based on ASA use at the time of study enrollment. The primary outcome was any new bleeding event. Secondary outcomes included new episodes of arterial or venous thrombosis, bleeding event type (major, fatal, life threatening, central nervous system, and non-major bleeding), emergency room visits, hospitalizations, transfusions, and death. Random chart audits were done to confirm the accuracy of the abstracted data. Event rates were compared using Poisson regression.ResultsWe identified a total of 1,139 patients on DOACs plus ASA and 4,422 patients on warfarin plus ASA. After propensity matching, we compared two groups of 1,114 matched patients. DOAC treated patients were predominately on apixaban (62.3%) and rivaroxaban (30.4%), most often at therapeutic doses (Table 1). Patients were largely (90.5%) on low dose ASA (≤ 100 mg). Patient demographics, co-morbidities, indication for anticoagulation, history of bleeding or clotting, medications, and duration of follow-up were well-balanced after matching. Patients were followed for a median of 11.7 months (interquartile range 4.4 and 34 months). Patients treated with DOAC+ASA had 2.4 thrombotic events per 100 patient years compared to 2.2 thrombotic events per 100 patient years with warfarin+ASA (P=0.78). There were no significant differences observed between groups by thrombotic subtype (stroke, transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, table 1). Bleeding was also similar with 30.1 bleeding events per 100 patient years with DOAC+ASA compared to 27.8 bleeds per 100 patient years with warfarin+ASA (P=0.24). There were no significant differences by bleeding subtype (table 1). Hospitalizations for clotting occurred less frequently with DOAC+ASA (0.9 hospitalizations per 100 patient years) compared to warfarin+ASA (1.7 hospitalizations per 100 patient years, P=0.03). Mortality, transfusions, and healthcare utilization were otherwise similar between the two groups.ConclusionsFor patients on a DOAC versus warfarin with ASA for atrial fibrillation and/or venous thromboembolic disease without a recent myocardial infarction or heart valve replacement, bleeding and thrombotic outcomes were similar. [Display omitted] DisclosuresKaatz: Gilead: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myer Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Osmosis Research: Research Funding. Kline-Rogers: Janssen: Consultancy; American College of Physicians: Consultancy. Sood: Bayer: Consultancy. Froehlich: Merck: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Fibromuscular Disease Society of America: Research Funding. Barnes: National Certification Board of Anticoagulation Providers: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy; Acelis: Consultancy; AMAG Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Connected Health: Consultancy; Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; AC Forum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy.

NICE on the management of venous thromboembolic diseases

In March, NICE updated its guideline on venous thromboembolic diseases: diagnosis, management and thrombophilia testing (NG158), which aims to support the rapid and effective treatment of people who develop deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. This article summarises the new guidance.

Management of venous thromboembolic disease in the era COVID-19. Recommendations of the Spanish phlebology and lymphology chapter of the SEACV

Angiología es una revista científica bimensual editada desde 1949. Está dedicada al estudio de las enfermedades vasculares, incluyendo todos los aspectos de la medicina vascular, el diagnóstico no invasivo, el tratamiento quirúrgico tradicional arterial y venoso, así como el mínimamente invasivo y/o endovascular.

The Role of Interventional Radiology in the Treatment of Acute Thrombosis and Chronic Veno-Occlusive Disease in Children and Adolescents

Abstract Pediatric venous thromboembolic disease is increasing in incidence in both inpatient and outpatient populations. A collaborative, multidisciplinary approach between interventional radiology (IR), hematology, anesthesiology, and critical care medicine provides the highest level of care for such patients. This review focuses on the clinical management of venous thromboembolic disease and the potential role of pediatric IR in treating these conditions.

Unresolved questions on venous thromboembolic disease. Consensus statement of the French Society for Vascular Medicine (SFMV).

In its promotion and scientific program, the French Society for Vascular Medicine (SFMV) has addressed a consensus statement regarding the “Unresolved questions on venous thromboembolic disease”. Indeed, several international guidelines were already proposed regarding management of venous thromboembolic disease, but many questions remain without clear established recommendations. In this context, a task force, mandated by the French society, has addressed issues regarding: Diagnosis of lower-limb deep vein thrombosis recurrence; Therapeutic management of superficial vein thrombosis; Therapeutic management of distal vein thrombosis; Therapeutic management of post thrombotic syndrome. The purpose of the consensus process was to provide expert guidance to answer to these specific cases that are not currently entirely resolved. For each of the identified questions, a systematic review of the available literature through Medline (1980–2017) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials analysis was performed. References in included studies and previous systematic reviews were also reviewed for additional potential studies. A multidisciplinary expert consensus group from 19 participants with expertise in the areas of vascular medicine, haematology, internal medicine, methodology, identified important clinical challenges for each issue. A steering committee of 5 to 6 participants was designed for each issue and developed the initial statements, associated with summaries of the evidence graded according to level of evidence

Risk Factors and Management of Venous Thromboembolic Diseases in Donor of Living Donor Liver Transplant

Background: liver transplantation surgically replaces a failing or diseased liver with one that is normal and healthy. At this time, transplantation is the only cure for liver insufficiency or liver failure because no device or machine reliably performs all of the functions of the liver. Aim of the Work: this study aimed to highlight risk factors of the venous thromboembolism in donors of living donor liver transplant and its management. Patients and Methods: this study included 40 patients who underwent hepatectomy for living donor liver transplant. All patients were evaluated extensively, including history and physical examination and specialty consultations when indicated. All patients did haematological studies to detect the risk factors of thromboembolic disease. Results: in patients with manifestations of venous thromboembolism 2 donors have single risk factor for venous thromboembolism and 4 donors have double risk factors. Conclusion: presence of multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolism led to increase in its incidence, so during preoperative assessment of the donors, if they have multiple risk factors for thrombosis some precautions should be taken to avoid venous thrombosis. Recommendations: preoperative precautions include heamatological consultations for the donors and prophylaxis dose of anticoagulant. Intra operative precautions included pneumatic calf pressure, elastic stocking. Finally postoperative precautions should be continued , these donors should take therapeutic doses of anticoagulants and follow up by lower limb venous duplex.

Novel (Oral) Anticoagulant Challenges in Surgery.

SummaryNon-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are a relatively recent therapeutic modality for the prevention of systemic thromboembolic complications of atrial fibrillation and the prevention and management of venous thromboembolic disease. Approved indications for this class of anticoagulants are likely to further expand as the results of ongoing and new clinical trials are published and clinical experience grows. Despite their convenience compared with traditional methods of anticoagulation, there remain a few potential pitfalls associated with their use in the perioperative setting. In particular, there is limited experience and evidence base regarding anticoagulant management in the perioperative setting, especially given the different NOACs available, which in turn are different from the classical anticoagulants. This narrative review synthesizes the recent advances in development of specific NOAC reversal agents and the understanding of the complexities of laboratory measurement of NOAC anticoagulant effects, and aims to provide practicing clinicians with basic evidence-based tools for perioperative management of patients taking NOACs.

A Comparison of Socioeconomic Factors in Patients Continuing Warfarin Versus Those Transitioning to Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) for Venous Thromboembolic Disease or Atrial Fibrillation

Introduction: The regulatory approval and growing clinical acceptance of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs: apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban) has challenged warfarin as the mainstay of anticoagulation for the management of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE: deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) and atrial fibrillation/flutter (Afib). As clinicians and patients choose from the expanded menu of oral anticoagulant options, it is unknown how socioeconomic variables like income, race, gender, health insurance, or marital status may influence which anticoagulant a patient utilizes.We sought to explore if patients who stayed on warfarin differed from those who changed to a DOAC, with regard to the aforementioned socioeconomic variables. Furthermore, we desired to assess how the clinical variable of INR management, as reflected by the percent of time in therapeutic range (TTR), compared between these two groups.Methods: The Michigan Anticoagulation Quality Improvement Initiative (MAQI2) is a multi-center collaborative registry of 6 active anticoagulation clinics across Michigan. Patients newly initiating warfarin for Afib or VTE between October 2009 and July 2016 were included. Enrollees who remained on warfarin in follow-up ("non-switchers") were compared to those that transitioned to a DOAC ("switchers") on the basis of demographics, TTR by linear interpolation, race, marital status, and insurance. Patients in each group were further analyzed in quartiles based on the median household income of their zip code of residence, derived from the 2014 U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey. Analyses were performed using Student's t-tests and Wilcoxon Rank-sum tests for continuous variables, and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables.Results: 8,480 patients met the inclusion criteria, 54.4% with Afib, 45.6% with VTE, and 1.1% with both; out of this group, 675 (8%) switched from warfarin to a DOAC. There were no significant differences between switchers and non-switchers for age (mean 68.1±13.6 and 67.4±15.7, p=0.23), gender (53.9% vs. 51.5% male, p=0.23), percent TTR on warfarin (55.1% vs. 56.9%, p=0.056), or percent with commercial health insurance (33.9% vs. 34.4%, p=0.78) or uninsured (0.3% vs. 0.9%, p=0.17).Patients were more likely to switch to DOAC therapy if they had Afib vs. VTE (10.9% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001). When comparing switchers to non-switchers, switchers were more often white race (88.8% vs. 81.5%, p<0.001), married/living with a partner (68.9% vs. 59.7%, p<0.001), and had Government Health Insurance (58.9% vs. 54.6%, p=0.032). As compared to non-switchers, switchers were less often African American (7% vs. 15.3%, p<0.001), and less often had insurance through a Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) (6.9% vs. 10.2%, p=0.008). Non-switchers more often resided in a zip code with a lower median household income compared to switchers (p<0.001).Conclusion: While DOACs are often considered in patients who have difficulty maintaining a therapeutic INR, TTR was not predictive of changing from warfarin to a DOAC in this population. However, we found that SES factors, such as race, insurance status and income are associated with a patient's likelihood for switching to DOAC therapy vs. remaining on warfarin therapy. Further investigation into the reason for, and clinical impact of, these observed disparities in the care of our patients is needed. [Display omitted] DisclosuresSood:Bayer: Research Funding. Kline-Rogers:Janssen: Consultancy; ACP: Consultancy; AC Forum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Almany:Abbott: Research Funding; Kona: Consultancy; Trice Orthopedics: Consultancy; MiCardia: Consultancy; Biostar Ventures: Equity Ownership; Ablative Solutions: Equity Ownership; Boston Scientific: Research Funding. Kaatz:Pfizer: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myer Squibb: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; CSL Behring: Honoraria. Froehlich:Boehringer-Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fibromuscular Disease Society of America: Research Funding; Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Barnes:Portolal: Consultancy; Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Prise en charge de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse en 2015

Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) constitute venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Venous thromboembolic disease is a common, serious, and multifactorial disease, the incidence of which increases with age. Risk factors, whether transient (surgery, plaster immobilization, bed rest/hospitalization) or chronic/persistent (age, cancer, clinical or biological thrombophilia, etc.), modulate the duration of treatment. In the absence of pathognomonic clinical sign or symptom, diagnostic management relies in the evaluation of the clinical pre-test probability followed by a laboratory or an imaging testing. So far, compression ultrasound and multidetector computed tomography angiography are the best diagnostic tests to make a positive diagnosis of DVT or PE, respectively. Anticoagulants at therapeutic dose for at least 3months constitute the cornerstone of VTE management. Availability of new direct oral anticoagulants, which have recently been shown to be as effective and as safe as vitamin K antagonist in clinical trials, should facilitate ambulatory management of VTE and favour extended treatments for individuals with unprovoked VTE or VTE provoked by a chronic/persistent risk factor.

The role of novel anticoagulants in the management of venous thromboembolic disease.

The introduction of oral direct coagulation factor inhibitors is dramatically changing the landscape of anticoagulation delivery in patients experiencing or at risk for a thrombotic event. These novel anticoagulants can be particularly attractive for health care providers, as they deliver therapeutic anticoagulation at a fixed dose, require no routine coagulation monitoring, and have few drug interactions and no food restrictions. Herein, we will review the role of these novel anticoagulants for acute venous thromboembolism treatment, primary and secondary venous thromboembolism prevention, and management during the periprocedural period.

NICE guidance on venous thromboembolic diseases

British Journal of Cardiac NursingVol. 9, No. 1 Policy UpdateNICE guidance on venous thromboembolic diseasesBelinda LindenBelinda LindenSearch for more papers by this authorBelinda LindenPublished Online:10 Apr 2014https://doi.org/10.12968/bjca.2014.9.1.7AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View articleReferencesHouse of Commons Health Committee (2005) The Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalised Patients. Second Report of Session 2004-05. The Stationery Office, London Google ScholarNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2012) CG144: Venous thromboembolic diseases: the management of venous thromboembolic diseases and the role of thrombophilia testing, http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG144 (accessed 11 December 2013) Google ScholarNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013a) QS29: Quality standard for the diagnosis and management of venous thromboembolic diseases. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/QS29 (accessed 11 December 2013) Google ScholarNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013b) Venous thromboembolism overview – pathway. http://pathways.nice.org.uk/pathways/venous-thromboembolism (accessed 11 December 2013) Google ScholarNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013c) QS29: Diagnosis and management of venous thromboembolic diseases: information for the public. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/QS29/PublicInfo/pdf/English (accessed 11 December 2013) Google ScholarNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013d) NICE support for commissioners: Diagnosis and management of venous thromboembolic diseases quality standard. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/live/14117/63350/63350.pdf (accessed 11 December 2013) Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails 1 January 2014Volume 9Issue 1ISSN (online): 2052-2207 Metrics History Published online 10 April 2014 Published in print 1 January 2014 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download

P155 Are we utilising CT pulmonary angiography appropriately in the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism? A three month review in a district general hospital

IntroductionCT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the recommended imaging modality for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Current NICE guidelines recommend using clinical prediction scoring systems to estimate the probability of PE and...

T150 Treatment of pulmonary embolism in active malignancy - prescribing practices amongst physicians

IntroductionPulmonary embolism (PE) is a common complication of malignancy. NICE guidance for the treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) issued in June 2012 recommended that those with active cancer and confirmed...

SECOT consensus on thromboembolisms in knee and hip replacement surgery

The purpose of this paper is to develop a professional consensus that proposes, in the light of the current scientific evidence and the clinical experience of an expert panel, some clinical recommendations directed at the Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (OTS) specialist and with the aim of reducing the variability in the prophylactic management of venous thromboembolic disease in knee and hip arthroplasty in clinical practice. The Delphi method was used, which consisted of two rounds of an e-mail questionnaire. Of the 55 items considered, a consensus was reached in 37 (67.2%) of them. In 31 cases there was consensus with the formulation of the item, and in 6 cases there was no agreed consensus. It was observed that there was a consensus in multiple clinical recommendations that could help OTS specialists in the making of decisions in their clinical practice.

Consenso SECOT sobre tromboembolismo en la cirugía protésica de rodilla y cadera

The purpose of this paper is to develop a professional consensus that proposes, in the light of the current scientific evidence and the clinical experience of an expert panel, some clinical recommendations directed at the Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery (OTS) specialist and with the aim of reducing the variability in the prophylactic management of venous thromboembolic disease in knee and hip arthroplasty in clinical practice. The Delphi method was used, which consisted of two rounds of an e-mail questionnaire. Of the 55 items considered, a consensus was reached in 37 (67.2%) of them. In 31 cases there was consensus with the formulation of the item, and in 6 cases there was no agreed consensus. It was observed that there was a consensus in multiple clinical recommendations that could help OTS specialists in the making of decisions in their clinical practice.

Guidelines concerning the management of venous thromboembolic diseases in cancer patients

Guidelines concerning the management of venous thromboembolic diseases in cancer patients