Management Of Urinary Incontinence Research Articles

Online Tools to Decrease Out-of-Pocket Prescription Costs for Patients: A Practical Guide for Urologists.

Patients who seek urologic care have recently reported a high degree of financial toxicity from prescription medications, including management for nephrolithiasis, urinary incontinence, and urological oncology. Estimating out-of-pocket costs can be challenging for urologists in the US because of variable insurance coverage, local pharmacy distributions, and complicated prescription pricing schemes. This article discusses resources that urologists can adopt into their practice and share with patients to help lower out-of-pocket spending for prescription medications. We identify 4 online tools that are designed to direct patients toward more affordable prescription medication options: the Medicare Part D Plan Finder, GoodRx, Amazon, and the Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company. A brief historical overview and summary for patients and clinicians are provided for each online resource. A patient-centered framework is provided to help navigate these 4 available tools in clinic. Among the 4 tools we identify, there are multiples tradeoffs to consider as financial savings and features can vary. First, patients insured by Medicare should explore the Part D Plan Finder each year to compare drug plans. Second, patients who need to urgently refill a prescription at a local pharmacy should visit GoodRx. Third, patients who are prescribed recurrent generic prescriptions for chronic conditions can utilize the Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company. Finally, patients who are prescribed 3 or more chronic medications can benefit from subscribing to Amazon RxPass. Prescription medications for urologic conditions can be expensive. This article includes 4 online resources that can help patients access medications at their most affordable costs. Urologists can provide this framework to their patients to help support lowering out-of-pocket drug costs.

Retropubic versus single-incision mid-urethral sling for concomitant management of stress urinary incontinence during native tissue vaginal repair: a randomized clinical trial

Retropubic versus single-incision mid-urethral sling for concomitant management of stress urinary incontinence during native tissue vaginal repair: a randomized clinical trial

Management of Neurogenic Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Updated Review

Management of Neurogenic Stress Urinary Incontinence: An Updated Review

Conformity of ChatGPT recommendations with the AUA/SUFU guideline on postprostatectomy urinary incontinence.

Artificial intelligence (AI) shows immense potential in medicine and Chat generative pretrained transformer (ChatGPT) has been used for different purposes in the field. However, it may not match the complexity and nuance of certain medical scenarios. This study evaluates the accuracy of ChatGPT 3.5 and 4 in providing recommendations regarding the management of postprostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI), considering The Incontinence After Prostate Treatment: AUA/SUFU Guideline as the best practice benchmark. A set of questions based on the AUA/SUFU Guideline was prepared. Queries included 10 conceptual questions and 10 case-based questions. All questions were open and entered into the ChatGPT with a recommendation to limit the answer to 200 words, for greater objectivity. Responses were graded as correct (1 point); partially correct (0.5 point), or incorrect (0 point). Performances of versions 3.5 and 4 of ChatGPT were analyzed overall and separately for the conceptual and the case-based questions. ChatGPT 3.5 scored 11.5 out of 20 points (57.5% accuracy), while ChatGPT 4 scored 18 (90.0%; p = 0.031). In the conceptual questions, ChatGPT 3.5 provided accurate answers to six questions along with one partially correct response and three incorrect answers, with a final score of 6.5. In contrast, ChatGPT 4 provided correct answers to eight questions and partially correct answers to two questions, scoring 9.0. In the case-based questions, ChatGPT 3.5 scored 5.0, while ChatGPT 4 scored 9.0. The domains where ChatGPT performed worst were evaluation, treatment options, surgical complications, and special situations. ChatGPT 4 demonstrated superior performance compared to ChatGPT 3.5 in providing recommendations for the management of PPUI, using the AUA/SUFU Guideline as a benchmark. Continuous monitoring is essential for evaluating the development and precision of AI-generated medical information.

(017) Comparing Complication Rates and Continence Control in Concurrent Dual Implantation of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis/Artificial Urinary Sphincter vs. Inflatable Penile Prosthesis/Male Sling: An Updated Comparative Pilot Study

Abstract Introduction Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and bulbourethral male sling are used frequently in the management of post prostatectomy urinary incontinence (UI) in men. Some surgeons used to combine an inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) procedure at the same setting to treat concurrent erectile dysfunction (ED). Recent clinical trials have aimed to determine the comparative effectiveness between the male sling and the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) in men with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery, focusing on non-inferiority. Objective We aim to compare continence control and complications rates in patients who underwent bulbourethral slings or AUS during IPP surgery via perineal approach. Methods A retrospective chart review was done in a large tertiary center. Post prostatectomy patients who underwent perineal dual implantation IPP and AUS or bulbourethral sling for ED and UI purposes, between 2014 and 2022 were included. Clinical data, patients’ demographics were retrieved. Post-operative outcomes with regards to IPP complication rates, revision rates for IPP/ AUS / Male sling, and continence control at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year were collected and included in the analysis. Continence control rates were assessed by the number of pads used per day on subsequent follow up visits for both groups. Results A total of 32 patients met the inclusion criteria. 16 Patients underwent synchronous IPP and AUS insertion, whereas another 16 patients underwent IPP with bulbourethral sling procedure. Patient demographics, median follow up & complication rates are summarized below in Table 1. In both groups the procedure was done through a perineal approach. There was no significant difference in baseline data among groups. Complication rates between AUS devices and bulbourethral slings showed no statistically significant differences (12.5% vs 6.25% p= 0.22 respectively). Infection rates and need for revision also did not show any statistically significant differences. With regards to post-operative continence rates, both groups had comparable outcome with no significant differences (P = 0.81). Upon the 6 months follow up visit, the AUS group, 56% were pad free, 19% used 1 pad per day, 19% used 2 pads per day, and 6% used 3 pads or more per day, while in the sling group, 50% were pad free, 25% used 1 pad per day, 19% used 2 pads per day, and 6% used 3 pads or more per day. Patients were followed for a total of 1 year after the surgery. Conclusions The combined insertion of IPP with either AUS or sling procedures has comparable outcomes with regards to continence rate and device- related complications. Each incontinence surgery should be chosen according to surgeon experience and specific patient indications. Further prospective studies on a larger sample of patients with longer follow up period are needed to solidify these findings and will guide patient's decision and preference for incontinence surgeries along with IPP once indicated. Disclosure No.

Current Approaches for the Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence - A Guideline of Guidelines

Urologists utilize evidence-based guidelines organized by urological organizations in the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The objective of this study is to provide guidance in the clinical management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) by reviewing key guidelines. We conducted a medical literature analysis in the following databases: PubMed, Medline, Embase, National Guideline Clearinghouse, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and Cochrane Library. We also manually searched the websites of the following international and national societies to identify relevant guidelines for inclusion in this review: the International Consultation on Incontinence, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, American Urogynecologic Society, American Urological Association/Society of Urodynamic, Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogenital Reconstruction, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, European Association of Urology, and Canadian Urological Association. The recommendations in the guidelines are summarized in different areas, including the diagnostic standards of SUI, examination and evaluation methods, and conservative treatment methods. This ‘guideline of guidelines’ presents the similarities and differences between prominent authorities in the management of SUI.

Provider Practice Patterns Regarding Over-The-Counter Continence Devices.

Vaginal inserts and continence devices are recommended as a conservative treatment option for the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI); however, practice patterns for recommendation and use of such devices are currently unknown. Our objectives were to better understand counseling patterns relating to over-the-counter (OTC) continence devices, to assess perceived barriers to recommending these devices, and to estimate clinician familiarity with three such devices currently available in the USA. In this cross-sectional study, an anonymous electronic survey was distributed to all Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited OB/GYN and Urology residency and Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery (FPMRS) fellowship programs. A total of 326 survey responses were collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess respondent characteristics associated with recommending OTC continence devices to patients. Sixty-four percent of respondents expressed familiarity with any OTC continence device. Of respondents who reported regular evaluation and treatment of women with SUI (n = 269), 60% reported ever recommending OTC devices for SUI. On multivariate regression, being a trainee and general OB/GYN provider were associated with being less likely to recommend OTC devices for SUI. Of respondents who did not regularly recommend OTC continence devices, reported barriers to doing so included a lack of training with these devices, leading to clinician discomfort (70%) and not remembering OTC devices as an option (15%). Given the low risk associated with patient use of these easily accessible devices, our study highlights barriers to clinician recommendation with the goal of increasing clinician awareness and consideration of OTC continence devices.

(211) Comparable Continence Rates Following Male Urethral Sling Surgery in “Standard” versus “Nonstandard” Patients

Abstract Introduction Transobturator male urethral slings are a surgical option for the management of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Historically, patient continence and satisfaction rates are influenced by several variables, including: baseline incontinence severity, prior surgical interventions, and exposure to radiation. Ideal or “standard” patients for sling placement have mild or moderate incontinence and no prior incontinence procedures or radiation exposure. Standard patients have been proposed to have better postoperative continence and satisfaction rates than their “nonstandard” counterparts. Objective In this study we sought to compare the efficacy and complication rates of transobturator male sling placement between standard and nonstandard patients. Methods A retrospective, single-institution review was performed of all patients who underwent either an AdVance™ or an AdVanceXP™ sling insertion between October 2016 and May 2023. Patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative continence rates, and complication rates were collected. Patients were then stratified as “standard’ vs “nonstandard”. Standard patients were defined as having a history of radical prostatectomy (robotic or open) and no prior radiation or prior incontinence procedure. Nonstandard patients had prior history of transurethral resection of the prostate, simple prostatectomy, radical cystectomy, prior sling insertion, or prior radiation. The continence and complication rates were compared between groups. Continence was measured in pads per day (PPD). Improvement in continence was defined as a reduction of at least 50% in PPD at 6 weeks postoperatively. Baseline and postoperative PPD were tabulated with median and 25th-75th percentiles, then compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Other variables were summarized with frequency and percentages, and compared using Fisher’s exact test. Results 62 patients were included in this study, of which 48 and 14 were standard and nonstandard, respectively. Mean age was 66 (52-85) years and body mass index (BMI) was 29 (20.3-39.8) kg/m2. No difference in baseline characteristics were noted between the groups (Table 1). 77% of patients had an improvement in SUI following sling placement: 38/48 (79%) patients in the standard group and 10/14 (71%) patients in the non standard group. The most common complication among both groups was urinary retention requiring catheterization (29%), which resolved spontaneously within two weeks in all patients. In the nonstandard group, one patient developed an abscess, one had a scrotal hematoma, and two patients had urinary tract infections (UTI). One patient with history of radiation developed a urethrocutaneous fistula requiring sling removal. There was no significant difference in overall complication rates between standard and nonstandard patients. Comparable rates of improvement in preoperative to postoperative SUI were noted: 2.5 to 0.8 PPD in the standard group and 3.3 to 1.0 PPD in the nonstandard group (Figure 1). Conclusions In this study, nonstandard and standard patients had similar continence and complication rates following urethral sling placement. Future prospective studies are warranted to assess the safety and long-term outcomes of standard and nonstandard patients. Disclosure No.

(220) Does Complication and Continence Rates Differ When Combining Inflatable Penile Prosthesis with Post Prostatectomy Incontinence Procedures Inserted Via Perineal Approach? An Updated Pilot Study

Abstract Introduction Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) and bulbourethral male sling are used frequently in the management of post prostatectomy urinary incontinence (UI) in men. Some surgeons used to combine an inflatable Penile Prosthesis (IPP) procedure at the same setting to treat concurrent erectile dysfunction (ED). Recent clinical trials have aimed to determine the comparative effectiveness between the male sling and the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) in men with urodynamic stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after prostate surgery, focusing on non-inferiority. Objective We aim to compare continence control and complications rates in patients who underwent bulbourethral slings or AUS during IPP surgery via perineal approach. Methods A retrospective chart review was done in a large tertiary center. Post prostatectomy patients who underwent perineal dual implantation IPP and AUS or bulbourethral sling for ED and UI purposes, between 2014 and 2022 were included. Clinical data, patients’ demographics were retrieved. Post-operative outcomes with regards to IPP complication rates, revision rates for IPP/ AUS / Male sling, and continence control at 6 weeks, 6 months and 1 year were collected and included in the analysis. Continence control rates were assessed by the number of pads used per day on subsequent follow up visits for both groups. Results A total of 32 patients met the inclusion criteria. 16 Patients underwent synchronous IPP and AUS insertion, whereas another 16 patients underwent IPP with bulbourethral sling procedure. Patient demographics, median follow up & complication rates are summarized below in Table 1. In both groups the procedure was done through a perineal approach. There was no significant difference in baseline data among groups. Complication rates between AUS devices and bulbourethral slings showed no statistically significant differences (12.5% vs 6.25% p= 0.22 respectively). Infection rates and need for revision also did not show any statistically significant differences. With regards to post-operative continence rates, both groups had comparable outcome with no significant differences (P = 0.81). Upon the 6 months follow up visit, the AUS group, 56% were pad free, 19% used 1 pad per day, 19% used 2 pads per day, and 6% used 3 pads or more per day, while in the sling group, 50% were pad free, 25% used 1 pad per day, 19% used 2 pads per day, and 6% used 3 pads or more per day. Patients were followed for a total of 1 year after the surgery. Conclusions The combined insertion of IPP with either AUS or sling procedures has comparable outcomes with regards to continence rate and device- related complications. Each incontinence surgery should be chosen according to surgeon experience and specific patient indications. Further prospective studies on a larger sample of patients with longer follow up period are needed to solidify these findings and will guide patient's decision and preference for incontinence surgeries along with IPP once indicated. Disclosure No.

Management of stress urinary incontinence associated with perimenopause

Pelvic health physiotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for those with lower urinary tract symptoms and pelvic floor dysfunction. Pelvic health physiotherapists treat a number of genitourinary conditions conservatively, including stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, pelvic organ prolapse and vaginal atrophy. When physiotherapy management alone does not fully resolve symptoms, medication may be required. Independent prescribing enables the physiotherapist to maintain continuity of care, allowing a smoother, more effective patient journey. This offers quicker access to medicines and helps avoid delays in commencing appropriate treatment, reducing waiting times across other services. In this article, the role of the pelvic health physiotherapy independent prescriber is detailed in a case study of a patient referred with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence associated with impaired pelvic floor function and episodic constipation, in addition to perimenopausal vaginal dryness causing dyspareunia.

Analysis of British Columbia practice patterns in the management of female stress urinary incontinence with emphasis on mesh use.

Female stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is common and has a profound impact on quality of life. Suburethral slings are the most common treatment for SUI in this population. These can be placed with synthetic mesh or autologous fascia. Mesh-related complications after midurethral sling procedures are documented in the literature but the risk of complications and reoperation is lower than the use of transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse repair. In this study, we sought to evaluate local practice patterns of management of female SUI with specific emphasis on mesh use. A survey created by an expert panel was disseminated to respective provincial societies. Sixty-eight percent of respondents offer midurethral slings in their practice but only 60.6% of these respondents would offer surgical removal of the sling if there were complications, such as mesh erosion or pain. The majority (39.4%) of respondents are performing transobturator slings as compared to retropubic midurethral slings (36.3%) and only 8.5% have removed the leg component associated with the transobturator sling in their practice. Furthermore, compared to most respondents offering midurethral slings (64.8%), only a minority of surgeons offer alternatives: 23.9% of respondents offer periurethral bulking agent injections, 15.5% offer pubovaginal slings, and 12.7% offer retropubic urethropexies. Our study supports that surgeons should continue to review surgical risks and alternative treatment options as part of the surgical consent process. As such, surgeons should be able to offer a variety of surgical approaches to manage female SUI.

Management of mixed urinary incontinence: IUGA committee opinion

Introduction and hypothesisMixed urinary incontinence (MUI) is defined by the International Urogynecology Association (IUGA) and International Continence Society as the complaint of involuntary leakage of urine associated with urgency and also with exertion, effort, sneezing or coughing. It therefore implies the coexistence of both stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI). MUI is a heterogeneous diagnosis that requires an assessment of its individual components of SUI and UUI. Management requires an individualised approach to the symptom components. The aim of this review is to identify the assessment/investigations and management options for MUI.MethodsA working subcommittee from the IUGA Research & Development (R&D) Committee was created and volunteers invited from the IUGA membership. A literature review was performed to provide guidance focused on the recommended assessment and management of MUI. The document was then evaluated by the entire IUGA R&D Committee and IUGA Board of Directors and revisions made. The final document represents the IUGA R&D Committee Opinion.ResultsThe R&D Committee MUI opinion paper provides guidance on the assessment and management of women with MUI and summarises the evidence-based recommendations.ConclusionsMixed urinary incontinence is a complex problem and successful management requires alleviation of both the stress and urge components. Care should be individualised based on patient preferences. Further research is needed to guide patients in setting goals and to determine which component of MUI to treat first. The evidence for many of the surgical/procedural treatment options for MUI are limited and needs to be explored in more detail.

ACVIM consensus statement on diagnosis and management of urinary incontinence in dogs.

Urinary incontinence (UI) is a disorder of micturition that can occur in dogs of any age, sex, and breed depending on the underlying cause and time of onset. Diagnosis and treatment for various causes of UI in dogs have been described by multiple comprehensive single author review articles, but large prospective clinical trials comparing treatment outcomes in veterinary medicine are lacking. The objectives of this consensus statement therefore are to provide guidelines on both recommended diagnostic testing and treatment for various causes of UI in dogs. Specifically, pathophysiology directly related to the canine urinary system will be reviewed and diagnostic and therapeutic challenges will be addressed. A panel of 12 experts in the field (8 small animal internists [L. Adams, J. Bartges, A. Berent, J. Byron, J. Foster, A. Kendall, S. Vaden, J. Westropp], 2 neurologists [J. Coates, N. Olby], 1 radiologist [G. Oetelaar], and 1 surgeon [C. Adin]) was formed to assess and summarize evidence in the peer-reviewed literature and to complement it with consensus recommendations using the Delphi method. Some statements were not voted on by all panelists. This consensus statement aims to provide guidance for management of both male and female dogs with underlying storage or voiding disorders resulting in UI.

Management of urinary incontinence in females by primary care providers: a systematic review.

To describe primary care provider (PCP) practices for the assessment and management of females with urinary incontinence (UI), and appraise these practices relative to recommendations made in high-quality clinical guidelines. Studies were searched in four databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science) from their respective inception dates to 6 March 2023. All studies describing UI evaluation and management practices used by PCPs for female patients were eligible. Two reviewers independently selected studies assessed their quality and extracted data. A narrative synthesis of included studies was performed to describe practices. Relevant evaluation and management practices were then compared to recommendations that were consistent across current high-quality UI guidelines. Pharmacotherapy, referrals, and follow-ups were reported descriptively only. A total of 3475 articles were retrieved and, among those, 31 were included in the review. The majority reported a poor-moderate adherence to performing a pelvic examination (reported adherence range: 23-76%; based on eight studies), abdominal examination (0-87%; three studies), pelvic floor muscle assessment (9-36%; two studies), and bladder diary (0-92%; nine studies), while there was high adherence to urine analysis (40-97%; nine studies). For the conservative management of UI, studies revealed a poor-moderate adherence to recommendations for pelvic floor muscle training (5-82%; nine studies), bladder training (2-53%; eight studies) and lifestyle interventions (1-71%; six studies). Regarding pharmacotherapy, PCPs predominantly prescribed antimuscarinics (2-46%; nine studies) and oestrogen (2-77%; seven studies). Lastly, PCPs referred those reporting UI to medical specialists (5-37%; 14 studies). Referrals were generally made <30 days after diagnosis with urologists being the most sought out professional to assess and treat UI. This review revealed poor-moderate adherence to clinical practice guideline recommendations. While these findings reflect high variability in reporting, the key message is that most aspects of patient care for female UI provided by PCPs needs to improve.

Effectiveness of auricular acupuncture and pelvic floor muscle training in the management of urinary incontinence following surgical treatment for prostate cancer: A randomized clinical trial

PurposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of auricular acupuncture combined with pelvic floor muscle training to manage urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy. MethodsThis is a randomized clinical trial that was conducted between April 2019 and April 2020 with 60 participants allocated into two groups, namely: control (pelvic muscle training) and intervention (auricular acupuncture + pelvic muscle training). Interventions were carried out during eight weekly sessions. Generalized estimating equations and proportion difference tests were applied in the statistical analysis with a significance level of 0.05. ResultsUrinary incontinence severity decreased between pre-test and post-test in both groups. There was a statistically significant difference of the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life between the groups at post-test in the domain “severity measures” (p = 0.013), and only in the intervention group between pre-test and post-test in the domains “emotions” (p < 0.001) and “sleep and mood” (p = 0.008). The intervention group was 20.8% (p = 0.007) and 25.3% (p = 0.002) less likely to present nocturia and urinary urgency, respectively. ConclusionsAuricular acupuncture combined with pelvic floor muscle training was more effective, compared to pelvic floor muscle training alone, in reducing the impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life and reducing the odds of nocturia and urinary urgency.

The management of urinary incontinence in nursing homes: a scoping review

The management of urinary incontinence in nursing homes: a scoping review

The Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise with Biofeedback in Women with Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review

Urinary incontinence affects approximately 200 million people worldwide. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of pelvic floor muscle (PFM) training with biofeedback (BF) in women with urinary incontinence in comparison to PFM training alone. The primary outcome was PFM strength with secondary outcomes being the severity of incontinence, other PFM parameters, quality of life (QoL), social life, satisfaction and adherence to treatment. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2005 to 2023 in PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched and evaluated with the PEDro scale. Nine moderate and two high methodological quality RCTs were selected. There was a statistically significant improvement in all parameters. In five studies, muscle strength and the severity of incontinence were statistically better in the BF group compared to the non-BF group. In most studies, no differences were found for QoL and social life between the groups. For adherence to treatment, the results were ambiguous. Τhe remaining variables (endurance, precontraction, function, adherence and satisfaction) had few studies to support the results. There was moderate level evidence that the group utilizing PFM exercises with BF showed significant improvements in the management of urinary incontinence. Concerning muscle strength and the severity of incontinence, findings were inconclusive, as only in some studies the results were statistically better in the BF group compared to the non-BF group.

Retrospective study of sacral neuromodulator implantations in a French hospital center: Lifespan and hospital costs assessment.

Sacral nerve neuromodulation (SNM) is a safe and effective therapy for the management of fecal and/or urinary incontinence. The generators InterStim™ and InterStim™ II (Medtronic™) are non-rechargeable active implantable medical devices with a limited lifespan. The aims of this study were to assess the generators' median lifespan for all indications and the long-term hospital costs of the therapy. This was a retrospective monocentric study that included 215 patients aged over 18years who were treated by SNM for fecal incontinence and/or urinary incontinence. Lifespan was considered as the amount of time between definitive implantation and observed battery depletion by the surgeon and was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Costs were assessed according to the activity-based pricing of the French public health care system. The median observed lifetime of stimulators implanted in our center was 7.29years and 5.9years for InterStim™ and InterStim™ II, respectively. The difference observed between the two generations was statistically significant. The modelling of primary implantation and renewal costs allowed us to observe that the decrease in the lifetime of Interstim™ II is associated with an increase in hospital costs over time. The retrospective study design is one limitation and we did not take into consideration stimulation's settings. The InterStim™ II lifespan is shorter than the first-generation device. This is associated with an increase of the long-term hospital costs. Additional information about the new neuromodulator will be required to choose the most appropriate IPG for the patient while optimizing the costs.

Urethral Mesh Assessment in Cancer Patients

Urethral mesh placement has become a common surgical intervention for the management of stress urinary incontinence. While this procedure offers significant benefits, it is not without potential complications. This review article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of urethral mesh assessment in oncologic patients. The article explores normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) mesh appearances and highlights the pathological aspects associated with urethral mesh complications including both short-term and long-term post-operative complications. By understanding the spectrum of normal findings of urethral mesh and the possible complications, clinicians can improve patient outcomes and make informed decisions regarding urethral mesh management in this patient population.

The Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review: Regulatory Reform and Remedies

For years, groups of patients and their families in the United Kingdom raised their concerns about three medical interventions. The first was a possible link between hormone pregnancy tests and fetal malformations and deaths; the second was the physical and neurodevelopmental impacts of in utero valproate exposure; and the third was life-changing adverse events caused by pelvic mesh implants for pelvic organ prolapse repair and stress urinary incontinence management. In response to their tireless campaigning, the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety (IMMDS) Review was commissioned by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care in 2018. The review, chaired by Baroness Cumberlege, found a catalogue of institutional, systems and structural failures within both the medical establishment and healthcare system more broadly. Drawing on the IMMDS Review findings on pelvic mesh, in this article, I consider the dire consequences when medical devices go wrong. Drawing on firsthand experience as lead researcher for the IMMDS Review, I examine some of the background, outline some key findings and reflect on the strategic changes recommended to medical device regulation and the redress prompted by the pelvic mesh scandal. In so doing, I contextualise and consider the relevant regulatory frameworks, the fundamental systems failures and the other issues identified. Three years on, this article also provides an opportunity to assess the extent to which the IMMDS Review recommendations have been successfully operationalised, as well as to take stock of the improvements that still need to be made.